Skip to content

Leviticus 7:25

“Prohibition on Eating Fat and Blood”Leviticus 7:22–27

King James Version
For whosoever eateth the fat of the beast, of which men offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD, even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
For whosoever eateth H398 the fat H2459 of the beast H929, of which men offer H7126 an offering made by fire H801 unto the LORD H3068, even the soul H5315 that eateth H398 it shall be cut off H3772 from his people H5971.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
If anyone eats the fat of an animal from which an offering made by fire may be presented to the LORD, the one who eats it must be cut off from his people.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
For whosoever eateth the fat of the beast, of which men offer an offering made by fire unto Jehovah, even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
For whoever eats the fat of the animal, of which men offer an offering made by fire to the LORD, even the soul who eats it shall be cut off from his people.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
For whosoeuer eateth the fat of the beast, of the which he shall offer an offering made by fire to the Lord, euen the person that eateth, shalbe cut off from his people.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
for whoever eateth the fat of the beast, of which one bringeth near a fire-offering to Jehovah, even the person who eateth hath been cut off from his people.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
15 Hebrew words
  1. כִּיkiifH3588PrtParticle Conditional
  2. כָּלkolanyH3605N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  3. אֹכֵל'o·Khel[one who] eatsH398V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
  4. חֵלֶבChe·levfatH2459N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  5. מִןminfromH4480PrepPreposition
  6. הַבְּהֵמָהha·be·he·Mahthe animalH929Art ¦ N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absoluteהַtheבְּהֵמָהanimal
  7. אֲשֶׁר'a·SherwhichH834RelParticle Relative
  8. יַקְרִיבyak·Rivhe will presentH7126V-Hiphil-Imperf-3msVerb Hiphil Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
  9. מִמֶּנָּהmi·Me·nahfrom itH4480Prep ¦ 3fsPreposition Definiteמִמֶּfromנָּהit
  10. אִשֶּׁה'i·Sheha fire offeringH801N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  11. לַיהוָהla·Yah·wehto YahwehH3068Prep-l ¦ N-properNoun Proper TitleלַtoיהוָהYahweh
  12. וְנִכְרְתָהve·nikh·re·Tahand it will be cut offH3772Conj-w ¦ V-Niphal-ConsecPerf-3fsVerb Niphal Consecutive Perfect 3rd Singular Feminineוְandנִכְרְתָהit will be cut off
  13. הַנֶּפֶשׁha·Ne·feshthe personH5315Art ¦ N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absoluteהַtheנֶּפֶשׁperson
  14. הָאֹכֶלֶתha·'o·Khe·letwho eatsH398Art ¦ V-Qal-Prtcpl-fsVerb Qal Participle Singular Feminine Absoluteהָwhoאֹכֶלֶתeats
  15. מֵעַמֶּיהָMe·'a·Mei·hafrom its kinspeople[s]H5971Prep-m ¦ N-mpc ¦ 3fsNoun Plural Masculine Construct with suffixמֵfromעַמֶּיkinspeople[s]הָits
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation differences
Translation
Details
In the KJVVerse 2,905 of 31,102 · 9.3%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Whoever eats the fat of the beasts offered by fire to the LORD takes what belongs to God, and that person is cut off from his people.

“For whosoever eateth the fat of the beast,”

The law reaches every Israelite, whatever his place.

“of which men offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD,”

The fat in view is the fat God claimed in the offerings burned on the altar.

“even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people.”

nephesh is the person who eats, and kârath, “cut off”, is one of the law’s heaviest sentences, also spoken over the uncircumcised and the Sabbath-breaker.

Passage studyLeviticus 7:22–27

The Fat and the Blood Belong to the LORD

22And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 23Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, Ye shall eat no manner of fat, of ox, or of sheep, or of goat. 24And the fat of the beast that dieth of itself, and the fat of that which is torn with beasts, may be used in any other use: but ye shall in no wise eat of it. 25For whosoever eateth the fat of the beast, of which men offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD, even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people. 26Moreover ye shall eat no manner of blood, whether it be of fowl or of beast, in any of your dwellings. 27Whatsoever soul it be that eateth any manner of blood, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.

Summary

When the laws of the peace offering are given, the LORD adds a word for all Israel. The fat of the ox, the sheep and the goat is forbidden to them as food, and so is the blood of every bird and beast, in every home they live in. The fat of an animal that died of itself or was torn by wild beasts may be put to other uses, but eating it stays forbidden. Whoever eats the fat of the offerings, or eats blood, is cut off from his people. The fat is the LORD’s portion, burned for him on the altar, and the blood holds the life that God gave for atonement. Both laws teach that the best and the life belong to God, and both point ahead to Christ, who gave himself to God for us and shed his blood to bring us near.

Why the fat and the blood belong to the LORD

Every animal Israel killed had two parts that were kept from the table, its fat and its blood. This passage gathers the two together, as the law of the peace offering had already done: “It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood” (Leviticus 3:17). Here the command is spelled out more fully, with the penalty for breaking it.

The fat is the LORD’s portion

The fat meant here is cheleb, the rich suet that covers the inner organs, the kidneys and the entrails, together with the fat tail of the sheep (Leviticus 3:3–5). Strong’s traces the word to a root meaning to be fat, and it is used for the choicest and richest part of anything. This was the part burned on the altar as the LORD’s portion (Exodus 29:13), where it went up in fire as a pleasing savour to him. Leviticus says it plainly: “all the fat is the LORD’s” (Leviticus 3:16).

When Israel kept the fat for God, they gave him the best of the animal and owned that every good thing comes from him and is his first. He is worthy of the finest portion, and he later rebuked his people through Malachi for bringing him offerings that were less than their best (Malachi 1:8).

The life is in the blood

The blood is set apart for a deeper reason, which Leviticus gives in God’s own words: “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul” (Leviticus 17:11). Life belongs to God, who gives it and sustains it, and so the blood that carries life is his. He gave it to Israel for one use, to be poured out on the altar for atonement, a life given in place of the sinner’s life.

That command is older than Moses. God gave it to Noah after the flood, for all mankind: “But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat” (Genesis 9:4). Deuteronomy gives the same reason, that the life is in the blood (Deuteronomy 12:23), and Leviticus later sets out the whole law of blood again, with the same penalty as here (Leviticus 17:10–14).

Keeping these laws marked Israel as a holy people, chosen by the LORD for himself (Deuteronomy 7:6). Their holiness reached their kitchens as well as the tabernacle, and at every meal the God who is holy reminded them whose they were.

The LORD speaks to Moses (7:22)

“And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying” opens a new set of commands in the middle of the law of the peace offering (Leviticus 7:11–36). The chapter began with the law of the guilt offering (Leviticus 7:1–10), and the verses just before this one gave the rules for the thank offering, the vow and the freewill offering, with the meals the worshippers shared. Now the LORD turns from how the offering is made to what may and may not be eaten. The setting is the wilderness at Mount Sinai, soon after the exodus, where God is shaping a people for himself.

Each word of the formula carries weight. Yᵉhôvâh, the LORD, is God’s personal covenant name, the name of the God who rescued Israel from slavery and bound himself to them, and it is used here in place of the general word for God, Elohim. The verb dâbar is the ordinary word for speaking, telling or mentioning, and ʼâmar, “saying”, is the usual word that introduces what someone says. So what follows is the LORD’s own speech, given through Moses.

The phrase comes again and again in Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers, opening one block of instruction after another, from the tabernacle (Exodus 25) to the laws of clean and unclean animals (Leviticus 11). Each time it reminds Israel that their laws came from the LORD, who had spoken the Ten Commandments from Sinai (Exodus 20:1), and that Moses was the man he chose to carry his words to the people. Israel had promised to do all that the LORD had said (Exodus 24:7), and his word was to be kept exactly as he gave it (Deuteronomy 4:2). The God who spoke at Sinai still guides his people by his word, which is “a lamp unto my feet” (Psalm 119:105).

Did God always speak to Moses in words?

God met Moses in several ways: in the burning bush (Exodus 3:2–4), in a thick cloud (Exodus 19:9), and face to face, “as a man speaketh unto his friend” (Exodus 33:11). “Spake unto Moses, saying” belongs to the giving of laws, where the exact words mattered. It describes God speaking to Moses so that Moses could pass the command on to all Israel.

The God who speaks through his Son

Moses was a faithful go-between under the old covenant, and he points ahead to the one who is greater. God “hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son” (Hebrews 1:1–2), who is “the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3). Jesus is the Word who was God (John 1:1) and who was made flesh (John 1:14), so to hear him is to hear God. Under the new covenant God writes his law on the hearts of his people (Jeremiah 31:33).

The fat of ox, sheep and goat (7:23)

The LORD tells Moses to speak, the same verb dâbar, to all the children of Israel, so this law is for every household. The fat they are forbidden is the cheleb of the three animals Israel brought to the altar, the ox, the sheep and the goat. “No manner of” renders kol, “all” or “every”, so the command takes in all of that fat. The verb is ʼâkal, the plain word for eating, and verse 26 uses the same verb for the blood.

The command matters most at the peace offering. That offering ended in a meal, where the worshipper ate of the animal after the portions for God and for the priests had been set aside. Even at that glad meal the fat went to the altar, and the people ate the rest. The fat meant is the suet around the organs and the fat tail. The fat marbled through the lean meat could be eaten.

Fat from a beast that died or was torn (7:24)

Verse 24 turns to fat from two kinds of carcass. The first is the beast “that dieth of itself”, nəḇēlāh, an animal that died of natural causes and was never slaughtered. The second is the one “torn with beasts”, ṭərêp̄âh, killed or mortally wounded by wild animals. Both made a person unclean. Whoever touched such a carcass or ate of it was unclean until the evening (Leviticus 11:39–40), and the law forbids eating torn flesh (Exodus 22:31) and the carcass of an animal that died of itself (Deuteronomy 14:21). Centuries later the prophet Ezekiel still refused to eat defiled food (Ezekiel 4:14).

The fat of these carcasses “may be used in any other use”. Fat was valuable, and God let it serve such purposes as lamp fuel, soap, lubrication and the treating of leather, so that it was put to use. The uncleanness lay in eating it, and the fat itself could serve every other need. On eating, the verse speaks with special force. The Hebrew doubles the verb, in effect “eating, ye shall not eat it”, which the KJV renders “ye shall in no wise eat of it”.

So the fat of the altar animals was holy because it was the LORD’s, and the fat of a carcass was unclean for food. Both were kept from Israel’s table, and in the one case the material could still be used. God’s law here keeps the line between holy and common, and between clean and unclean, while also caring for the daily needs of his people.

What does “cut off from his people” mean? (7:25, 7:27)

Verse 25 gives the weight behind the fat law: “whosoever eateth the fat of the beast, of which men offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD, even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people.” The clause ties the forbidden fat to the altar. This is the fat God claimed in the offerings made by fire, and to eat it was to take for oneself what belonged to him.

“Whosoever” and “the soul that eateth it” make the law personal. nephesh, “soul”, means a breathing creature, a life, a self or a person, and here it is the person who eats, whoever he is, priest or farmer alike. Verse 27 uses the same word twice for blood: “Whatsoever soul it be... even that soul.”

The verb in both verses is kârath, to cut off, cut down or cut asunder. It is also the verb used for making a covenant, which Strong’s explains from the cutting of flesh when a covenant was made. Being cut off from one’s people was among the heaviest penalties in the law. The same sentence falls on the man who refused circumcision (Genesis 17:14) and on the one who profaned the Sabbath (Exodus 31:14). The phrase can cover three things, and the case at hand decides which is meant: being put out of the life and worship of Israel, an early death at God’s hand, or the end of a man’s family line in Israel. Each of them severs a person from the covenant people and from the blessings of the covenant God made with them at Sinai (Exodus 24:7–8).

The penalty shows how seriously God guards what he has set apart. To eat the fat or the blood was an act of rebellion against his authority, however small the act looked at the table.

No blood in any of your dwellings (7:26)

The word for blood is dâm, the blood of man or beast, and “no manner of blood” is kol-dam, any blood at all, whatever its source or amount. “Whether it be of fowl or of beast” takes in the birds as well as the animals, so the command covers every creature Israel hunted or raised.

“In any of your dwellings” uses môwshâb, a seat or dwelling, any place where people live, whether a tent, a town or a city. The law reached past the tabernacle into every home and every place Israel would settle. The fat law named the animals of the altar, and the blood law follows Israel to every meal, wherever they lived.

The nations around Israel used blood in their rituals, believing it brought them power or communion with their gods. Israel’s God gave blood one holy purpose, atonement on his altar, and he kept it from their mouths. Verse 27 then sets the same penalty on blood that verse 25 set on the fat.

Do these laws apply to Christians today?

The food laws of the old covenant, the ban on fat among them, are fulfilled in Christ, and the New Testament teaches that all foods are clean. Jesus taught that what goes into a man from outside cannot defile him, because defilement comes from the heart, and that it goes out into the draught, “purging all meats” (Mark 7:19). Matthew gives his words: “Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man” (Matthew 15:11). Peter learned the same in his vision, when God told him, “What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common” (Acts 10:15).

Blood is the harder question. The council at Jerusalem asked Gentile believers to “abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication” (Acts 15:29). Believers differ on what this asks of us. Some hold that the command still stands for every believer, since God gave it to Noah for all mankind long before Moses, and the apostles repeated it to Gentiles. Others hold that it was a pastoral word for that time, given so that Gentile believers would keep peace with Jewish believers and the church would stay one, and that the food law itself is fulfilled in Christ. Both agree that life belongs to God and that blood speaks of the atonement he provides.

Christ, the best offering and the shed blood

The fat was the best part given to God, and in Christ God received the best offering of all. John the Baptist pointed to him and said, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Christ “hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour” (Ephesians 5:2), offering his sinless life, his perfect obedience and his death. By that one offering we are sanctified “through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Hebrews 10:10).

The blood points ahead even more clearly. The law kept blood for the altar because “without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22), and Christ’s blood was poured out to God for that very purpose. At the Last Supper he said, “this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28). His blood cleanses us from the defilement of sin itself (Hebrews 9:14). By it we are “justified by his blood” (Romans 5:9), “made nigh by the blood of Christ” (Ephesians 2:13), and given peace with God, “having made peace through the blood of his cross” (Colossians 1:20).

Israel was forbidden every manner of blood, and Jesus tells his people that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood has eternal life (John 6:53–56). At the Lord’s Supper believers receive the cup of his blood and share, by faith, in the life his death has won.

The Israelite who ate the LORD’s portion was cut off from his people. Isaiah says of the Servant of the LORD, “he was cut off out of the land of the living” (Isaiah 53:8). Christ was cut off so that all who trust in him are brought near and adopted as God’s children (Ephesians 1:5).

The best and the life are God’s

These six verses show us a God who claims the best of what he gives and who holds every life in his hand. Israel learned it at every meal, as the fat went up in fire and the blood was poured out. We see it most clearly at the cross, where God himself provided the costliest offering and the blood of his own Son.

The offering God asks of us now is the whole of our lives. Paul calls those who belong to Christ to present their bodies “a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service” (Romans 12:1). Our time, gifts, money and love are his first, as the fat was. Peter gives the church the same call to holiness that shaped Israel’s tables: “Be ye holy; for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:15–16). And the penalty that hung over this law has fallen on Christ, so that those who trust him are brought near to God and kept there.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Leviticus 7:11–34. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 24 verses
Passage under commentLeviticus 7:11–34
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

All this relates to the peace-offerings: it is the repetition and explication of what we had before, with various additions.

I.The nature and intention of the peace-offerings are here more distinctly opened. They were offered either,

1.In thankfulness for some special mercy received, such as recovery from sickness, preservation in a journey, deliverance at sea, redemption out of captivity, all which are specified in Ps. 107, and for them men are called upon to offer the sacrifice of thanksgiving, Leviticus 7:22. Or,

2.In performance of some vow which a man made when he was in distress (Leviticus 7:16), and this was less honourable than the former, though the omission of it would have been more culpable. Or,

3.In supplication for some special mercy which a man was in the pursuit and expectation of, here called a voluntary offering. This accompanied a man's prayers, as the former did his praises. We do not find that men were bound by the law, unless they had bound themselves by vow, to offer these peace-offerings upon such occasions, as they were to bring their sacrifices of atonement in case of sin committed. Not but that prayer and praise are as much our duty as repentance is; but here, in the expressions of their sense of mercy, God left them more to their liberty than in the expressions of their sense of sin - to try the generosity of their devotion, and that their sacrifices, being free-will offerings, might be the more laudable and acceptable; and, by obliging them to bring the sacrifices of atonement, God would show the necessity of the great propitiation.

II.The rites and ceremonies about the peace-offerings are enlarged upon.

1.If the peace-offering was offered for a thanksgiving, a meat-offering must be offered with it, cakes of several sorts, and wafers (Leviticus 7:12), and (which was peculiar to the peace-offerings) leavened bread must be offered, not to be burnt upon the altar, that was forbidden (Leviticus 2:11), but to be eaten with the flesh of the sacrifice, that nothing might be wanting to make it a complete and pleasant feast; for unleavened bread was less grateful to the taste, and therefore, though enjoined in the passover for a particular reason, yet in other festivals leavened bread, which was lighter and more pleasant, was appointed, that men might feast at God's table as well as at their own. And some think that a meat-offering is required to be brought with every peace-offering, as well as with that of thanksgiving, by that law (Leviticus 7:29) which requires an oblation with it, that the table might be as well furnished as the altar.

2.The flesh of the peace-offerings, both that which was the priest's share and that which was the offerer's must be eaten quickly, and not kept long, either raw, or dressed, cold. If it was a peace-offering for thanksgiving, it must be all eaten the same day (Leviticus 7:16); if a vow, or voluntary offering, it must be eaten either the same day or the day after, Leviticus 7:16. If any was left beyond the time limited, it was to be burnt (Leviticus 7:17); and, if any person ate of what was so left their conduct should be animadverted upon as a very high misdemeanour, Leviticus 7:18. Though they were not obliged to eat it in the holy place, as those offerings that are called most holy, but might take it to their own tents and feast upon it there, yet God would by this law make them to know a difference between that and other meat, and religiously to observe it, that whereas they might keep other meat cold in the house as long as they thought fit, and warm it again if they pleased, and eat it three or four days after, they might not do so with the flesh of their peace-offerings, but it must be eaten immediately.

(1.)Because God would not have that holy flesh to be in danger of putrefying, or being fly-blown, to prevent which it must be salted with fire (as the expression is, Mark 9:49) if it were kept; as, if it was used, it must be salted with salt.

(2.)Because God would not have his people to be niggardly and sparing, and distrustful of providence, but cheerfully to enjoy what God gives them (Ecclesiastes 8:15), and to do good with it, and not to be anxiously solicitous for the morrow.

(3.)The flesh of the peace-offerings was God's treat, and therefore God would have the disposal of it; and he orders it to be used generously for the entertainment of their friends, and charitably for the relief of the poor, to show that he is a bountiful benefactor, giving us all things richly to enjoy, the bread of the day in its day. If the sacrifice was thanksgiving, they were especially obliged thus to testify their holy joy in God's goodness by their holy feasting. This law is made very strict (Leviticus 7:18), that if the offerer did not take care to have all his offering eaten by himself or his family, his friends or the poor, within the time limited by the law, or, in the event of any part being left, to burn it (which was the most decent way of disposing of it, the sacrifices upon the altar being consumed by fire), then his offering should not be accepted, nor imputed to him. Note, All the benefit of our religious services is lost if we do not improve them, and conduct ourselves aright afterwards. They are not acceptable to God if they have not a due influence upon ourselves. If a man seemed generous in bringing a peace-offering, and yet afterwards proved sneaking and paltry in the using of it, it was as if he had never brought it; nay, it shall be an abomination. Note, There is no mean between God's acceptance and his abhorrence. If our persons and performances are sincere and upright, they are accepted; if not, they are an abomination, Proverbs 15:8. He that eats it after the time appointed shall bear his iniquity, that is, he shall be cut off from his people, as it is explained (Leviticus 19:8), where this law is repeated. This law of eating the peace-offerings before the third day, that they might not putrefy, is applicable tot the resurrection of Christ after two days, that, being God's holy one, he might not see corruption, Psalm 16:10. And some think that it instructs us speedily, and without delay, to partake of Christ and his grace, feeding and feasting thereon by faith today, while it is called today (Hebrews 3:13, Hebrews 3:14), for it will be too late shortly.

3.But the flesh, and those that eat it, must be pure.

(1.)The flesh must touch no unclean thing; if it did, it must not be eaten, but burnt, Leviticus 7:19. If, in carrying it from the altar to the place where it was eaten, a dog touched it, or it touched a dead body or any other unclean thing, it was then unfit to be used in a religious feast. Every thing we honour the holy God with must be pure and carefully kept from all pollution. It is a case adjudged (Haggai 2:12) that the holy flesh could not by its touch communicate holiness to what was common; but by this law it is determined that by the touch of that which was unclean it received pollution from it, which intimates that the infection of sin is more easily and more frequently communicated than the savour of grace.

(2.)It must not be eaten by any unclean person. When a person was upon any account ceremonially unclean it was at his peril if he presumed to eat of the flesh of the peace-offerings, Leviticus 7:20, Leviticus 7:21. Holy things are only for holy persons; the holiness of the food being ceremonial, those were incapacitated to partake of it who lay under any ceremonial uncleanness; but we are hereby taught to preserve ourselves pure from all the pollutions of sin, that we may have the benefit and comfort of Christ's sacrifice, 1 Peter 2:1, 1 Peter 2:2. Our consciences must be purged from dead works, that we may be fit to serve the living God, Hebrews 9:14. But if any dare to partake of the table of the Lord under the pollution of sin unrepented of, and so profane sacred things, they eat and drink judgment to themselves, as those did that ate of the peace-offerings (Leviticus 7:20) and again (Leviticus 7:21), that they pertain unto the Lord: whatever pertains to the Lord is sacred, and must be used with great reverence and not with unhallowed hands. "Be you holy, for God is holy, and you pertain to him."

4.The eating of blood and the fat of the inwards is here again prohibited; and the prohibition is annexed as before to the law of the peace-offerings, Leviticus 3:17.

(1.)The prohibition of the fat seems to be confined to those beasts which were used for sacrifice, the bullocks, sheep, and goats: but of the roe-buck, the hart, and other clean beasts, they might eat the fat; for those only of which offerings were brought are mentioned here, Leviticus 7:23-25. This was to preserve in their minds a reverence for God's altar, on which the fat of the inwards was burnt. The Jews say, "If a man eat so much as an olive of forbidden fat - if he do it presumptuously, he is in danger of being cut off by the hand of God - if ignorantly, he is to bring a sin-offering, and so to pay dearly for his carelessness." To eat of the flesh of that which died of itself, or was torn of beasts, was unlawful; but to eat of the fat of such was doubly unlawful, Leviticus 7:24.

(2.)The prohibition of blood is more general (Leviticus 7:26, Leviticus 7:27), because the fat was offered to God only by way of acknowledgment, but the blood made atonement for the soul, and so typified Christ's sacrifice much more than the burning of the fat did; to this therefore a greater reverence must be paid, till these types had their accomplishment in the offering up of the body of Christ once for all. The Jews rightly expound this law as forbidding only the blood of the life, as they express it, not that which we call the gravy, for of that they supposed it was lawful to eat.

5.The priest's share of the peace-offerings is here prescribed. Out of every beast that was offered for a peace-offering the priest that offered it was to have to himself the breast and the right shoulder, Leviticus 7:30-34. Observe here,

(1.)That when the sacrifice was killed the offerer himself must, with his own hands, present God's part of it, that he might signify thereby his cheerfully giving it up to God, and his desire that it might be accepted. He was with his own hands to lift it up, in token of his regard to God as the God of heaven, and then to wave it to and fro, in token of his regard to God as the Lord of the whole earth, to whom thus, as far as he could reach, he offered it, showing his readiness and wish to do him honour. Now that which was thus heaved and waved was the fat, and the breast, and the right shoulder, it was all offered to God; and then he ordered the fat to his altar, and the breast and shoulder to his priest, both being his receivers.

(2.)That when the fat was burnt the priest took his part, on which he and his family were to feast, as well as the offerer and his family. In holy joy and thanksgiving, it is good to have our ministers to go before us, and to be our mouth to God. The melody is sweet when he that sows and those that reap rejoice together. Some observe a significancy in the parts assigned to the priests: the breast and the shoulder intimate the affections and the actions, which must be devoted to the honour of God by all his people and to the service also of the church by all his priests. Christ, our great peace-offering, feasts all his spiritual priests with the breast and shoulder, with the dearest love and the sweetest and strongest supports; for his is the wisdom of God and the power of God. When Saul was designed for a king Samuel ordered the shoulder of the peace-offering to be set before him (1 Samuel 9:24), which gave him a hint of something great and sacred intended for him. Jesus Christ is our great peace-offering; for he made himself a sacrifice, not only to atone for sin, and so to save us from the curse, but to purchase a blessing for us, and all good. By our joyfully partaking of the benefits of redemption we feast upon the sacrifice, to signify which the Lord's supper was instituted.

Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Leviticus 7:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8