Leviticus 19:20
“Prohibitions on Mixtures and Customs”Leviticus 19:19–22
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- וְאִישׁVe·'ishand a manH376Conj-w ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteוְandאִישׁa man
- כִּיkiifH3588PrtParticle Conditional
- יִשְׁכַּבyish·Kavhe will lie withH7901V-Qal-Imperf-3msVerb Qal Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- אֶת'et[obj.]H853DirObjMParticle Object Indicator
- אִשָּׁה'i·Shaha womanH802N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- שִׁכְבַתshikh·vata laying ofH7902N-fscNoun Singular Feminine Construct
- זֶרַעZe·ra'seedH2233N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
- וְהִואve·Hiv'and sheH1931Conj-w ¦ Pro-3fsPronoun Personal 3rd Singular Feminineוְandהִואshe
- שִׁפְחָהshif·Chah[is] a female slaveH8198N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- נֶחֱרֶפֶתne·che·Re·fetintendedH2778V-Niphal-Prtcpl-fsVerb Niphal Participle Singular Feminine Absolute
- לְאִישׁle·'Ishfor a manH376Prep-l ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteלְforאִישׁa man
- וְהָפְדֵּהve·ha·fe·Dehand certainly [to be released]H6299Conj-w ¦ V-Hophal-InfAbsVerb Hophal Infinitive Absoluteוְandהָפְדֵּהcertainly [to be released]
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- נִפְדָּתָהnif·Da·tahshe had been releasedH6299V-Niphal-Perf-3fsVerb Niphal Perfect 3rd Singular Feminine
- אוֹ'oorH176ConjConjunction
- חֻפְשָׁהchuf·ShahfreedomH2668N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- נִתַּןni·tanit had been givenH5414V-Niphal-Perf-3msVerb Niphal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- לָהּLahto [the] herPrep-l ¦ 3fsSuffix Personal 3rd Singular Feminineלָto [the]הּher
- בִּקֹּרֶתbi·Ko·retcompensationH1244N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- תִּהְיֶהtih·Yehit will beH1961V-Qal-Imperf-3fsVerb Qal Imperfect 3rd Singular Feminine
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- יוּמְתוּyu·me·Tuthey will be put to deathH4191V-Hophal-Imperf-3mpVerb Hophal Imperfect 3rd Plural Masculine
- כִּיkiforH3588PrtParticle Conditional
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- חֻפָּשָׁהchu·Pa·shahshe had been given freedomH2666V-Pual-Perf-3fsVerb Pual Perfect 3rd Singular Feminine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Leviticus 19:19–29. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Here is, I. A law against mixtures, Leviticus 19:19. God in the beginning made the cattle after their kind (Genesis 1:25), and we must acquiesce in the order of nature God hath established, believing that is best and sufficient, and not covet monsters. Add thou not unto his works, lest he reprove thee; for it is the excellency of the work of God that nothing can, without making it worse, be either put to it or taken from it, Ecclesiastes 3:14. As what God has joined we must not separate, so what he has separated we must not join. The sowing of mingled corn and the wearing of linsey-woolsey garments are forbidden, either as superstitious customs of the heathen or to intimate how careful they should be not to mingle themselves with the heathen nor to weave any of the usages of the Gentiles into God's ordinances. Ainsworth suggests that it was to lead Israel to the simplicity and sincerity of religion, and to all the parts and doctrines of the law and gospel in their distinct kinds. As faith is necessary, good works are necessary, but to mingle these together in the cause of our justification before God is forbidden, Galatians 2:16.
II.A law for punishing adultery committed with one that was a bondmaid that was espoused, Leviticus 19:20-22.
If she had not been espoused, the law appointed no punishment at all; being espoused, if she had not been a bondmaid, the punishment had been no less than death: but, being as yet a bondmaid (though before the completing of her espousals she must have been made free), the capital punishment is remitted, and they shall both be scourged; or, as some think, the woman only, and the man was to bring a sacrifice. It was for the honour of marriage, though but begun by betrothing, that the crime should be punished; but it was for the honour of freedom that it should not be punished as the debauching of a free woman was, so great was the difference then made between bond and free (Galatians 4:30); but the gospel of Christ knows no such distinction, Colossians 3:11.
III.A law concerning fruit-trees, that for the first three years after they were planted, if they should happen to be so forward as to bear in that time, yet no use should be made of the fruit, Leviticus 19:23-25. It was therefore the practice of the Jews to pluck off the fruit, as soon as they perceived it knit, from their young trees, as gardeners do sometimes, because their early bearing hinders their growing. If any did come to perfection, it was not to be used in the service either of God or man; but what they bore the fourth year was to be holy to the Lord, either given to the priests, or eaten before the Lord with joy, as their second tithe was, and thenceforward it was all their own. Now,
1.Some think this taught them not to follow the custom of the heathen, who, they say, consecrated the very first products of their fruit-trees to their idols, saying that otherwise all the fruits would be blasted.
2.This law in the case of fruit-trees seems to be parallel with that in the case of animals, that no creature should be accepted as an offering till it was past eight days old, nor till that day were children to be circumcised; see Leviticus 22:27. God would have the first-fruits of their trees, but, because for the first three years they were as inconsiderable as a lamb or a calf under eight days old, therefore God would not have them, for it is fit he should have every thing at its best; and yet he would not allow them to be used, because his first-fruits were not as yet offered: they must therefore be accounted as uncircumcised, that is, as an animal under eight days' old, not fit for any use.
3.We are hereby taught not to be over-hasty in catching at any comfort, but to be willing with patience to wait the time for the enjoyment of it, and particularly to acknowledge ourselves unworthy of the increase of the earth, our right to the fruits of which was forfeited by our first parents eating forbidden fruit, and we are restored to it only by the word of God and prayer, 1 Timothy 4:5.
IV.A law against the superstitious usages of the heathen, Leviticus 19:26-28.
1.Eating upon the blood, as the Gentiles did, who gathered the blood of their sacrifices into a vessel for their demons (as they fancied) to drink, and then sat about it, eating the flesh themselves, signifying their communion with devils by their feasting with them. Let not this custom be used, for the blood of God's sacrifices was to be sprinkled on the altar, and then poured at the foot of it, and conveyed away.
2.Enchantment and divination, and a superstitious observation of the times, some days and hours lucky and others unlucky. Curious arts of this kind, it is likely, had been of late invented by the Egyptian priests, to amuse the people, and support their own credit. The Israelites had seen them practised, but must by no means imitate them. It would be unpardonable in those to whom were committed the oracles of God to ask counsel of the devil, and yet worse in Christians, to whom the Son of God is manifested, who has destroyed the works of the devil. For Christians to have their nativities cast, and their fortunes told them, to use spells and charms for the cure of diseases and the driving away of evil spirits, to be affected with the falling of the salt, a hare crossing the way, cross days, or the like, is an intolerable affront to the Lord Jesus, a support of paganism and idolatry, and a reproach both to themselves and to that worthy name by which they are called: and those must be grossly ignorant, both of the law and the gospel, that ask, "What harm is there in these things?" Is it no harm for those that have fellowship with Christ to have fellowship with devils, or to learn the ways of those that have? Surely we have not so learned Christ.
3.There was a superstition even in trimming themselves used by the heathen, which must not be imitated by the people of God: You shall not round the corners of your heads. Those that worshipped the hosts of heaven, in honour of them, cut their hair so as that their heads might resemble the celestial globe; but, as the custom was foolish itself, so, being done with respect to their false gods, it was idolatrous.
4.The rites and ceremonies by which they expressed their sorrow at their funerals must not be imitated, Leviticus 19:28. They must not make cuts or prints in their flesh for the dead; for the heathen did so to pacify the infernal deities they dreamt of, and to render them propitious to their deceased friends. Christ by his sufferings has altered the property of death, and made it a true friend to every true Israelite; and now, as there needs nothing to make death propitious to us (for, if God be so, death is so of course), so we sorrow not as those that have no hope. Those whom the God of Israel had set apart for himself must not receive the image and superscription of these dunghill deities. Lastly, The prostituting of their daughters to uncleanness, which is here forbidden (Leviticus 19:29), seems to have been practised by the heathen in their idolatrous worships, for with such abominations those unclean spirits which they worshipped were well pleased. And when lewdness obtained as a religious rite, and was committed in their temples, no marvel that the land became full of that wickedness, which, when it entered at the temple-doors, overspread the land like a mighty torrent, and bore down all the fences of virtue and modesty. The devil himself could not have brought such abominations into their lives if he had not first brought them into their worships. And justly were those given up to vile affections who forsook the holy God, and gave divine honours to impure spirits. Those that dishonour God are thus suffered to dishonour themselves and their families.
Continue studying Leviticus 19:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
A man who lies with a slave woman betrothed to another has sinned, and she is scourged, but because she was still in bondage the death penalty for adultery is withheld from them both.
“And whosoever lieth carnally with a woman,”
The law begins with the man and holds him responsible. “Lieth carnally” is the plain term for sexual intercourse.
“that is a bondmaid, betrothed to an husband,”
A shiphchâh, a female slave, who is promised (châraph) to another man. The two facts together make this a special case.
“and not at all redeemed, nor freedom given her;”
She has been neither bought out of her service nor set free, so her master still has authority over her.
“she shall be scourged;”
The KJV’s rendering of the noun biqqôreth. The act is punished as a real wrong.
“they shall not be put to death,”
“They” covers both the man and the woman. The penalty for adultery with a free woman is withheld.
“because she was not free.”
The stated ground of the ruling. Her bondage lessens her guilt in the eyes of the law.
Passage studyLeviticus 19:19–22
Mixed Kinds and the Betrothed Bondmaid
Summary
These four verses hold two laws from the chapter in which the LORD calls Israel to be holy as he is holy. The first forbids three mixtures: breeding cattle with a different kind, sowing a field with mixed seed, and wearing cloth of linen and wool together. The second rules on a man who lies with a slave woman who is promised to another man. Because of her bondage the death penalty for adultery is withheld, she is scourged, and the man must bring a ram as a trespass offering. The priest makes atonement for him, and God promises that his sin “shall be forgiven him”.
Ye shall keep my statutes
Verse 19 opens with a short command that governs everything after it: “Ye shall keep my statutes.” The laws that follow are God’s own, and Israel keeps them as part of belonging to him by covenant. They stand in the chapter that begins with the LORD’s call to Israel to be holy because he is holy (Leviticus 19:2), inside the part of Leviticus often called the Holiness Code, chapters 17 to 26. The verses before this one deal with justice toward the poor and forbid slander, hatred and vengeance. Here the same holiness reaches the farmyard, the field and the clothes a person wears, and the laws that come next concern the fruit of young trees. Holiness in this chapter covers the whole of life, the ordinary parts as much as the worship at the sanctuary.
Why did God forbid these three mixtures?
God made the world with distinct kinds in it, and these laws taught Israel to honour the order he gave and to live as a people set apart for him. In the beginning plants and animals were each made to reproduce after their kind (Genesis 1:11–25). God is a God of order, and by keeping kinds distinct in their daily work Israel reflected who he is.
The two words for mixing
The Hebrew behind “a diverse kind” and “mingled seed” is kilʼayim, a dual form from a root meaning separation. It speaks of two things of different kinds brought together. The garment “mingled of linen and woollen” has the same Hebrew word behind “mingled”, and beside it stands a rare word, shaʻaṭnêz, which names one particular cloth, a fabric of linen and wool together, sometimes called linsey-woolsey. Where the word came from is debated, and it may be foreign in origin.
Cattle, seed and cloth
The first law forbids letting cattle “gender”, that is breed, with a different kind of animal. Each creature was made to reproduce after its kind, and Israel’s herds were to stay as God made them. The second forbids sowing one field with two kinds of seed, which applies the same principle to the crops. Both laws may also have had practical value in keeping breeds and crop varieties sound and in hindering the spread of disease, though the verse itself gives one reason only, that these are God’s statutes.
The third law is the most specific. Linen was the cloth of priestly garments and was associated with purity, while wool was the common cloth of everyday wear, and Israel was to keep the two apart in what they put on. Since clothing is seen by everyone, this law gave Israel a daily, visible sign of who they were. The law is repeated, with further detail, in Deuteronomy 22:9–11.
A people set apart
The nations around Israel blended the worship of many gods, and their fertility rites are said to have used mixtures of seed or of animals in the hope of winning a god’s favour for the harvest and the herd. Cloth of linen and wool may also have been worn in pagan worship. Israel was to be unmistakably different from Canaan and Egypt, and these laws built that difference into daily work. The outward separation pictured an inward one, a worship of the LORD kept free from the worship of other gods. Moses says that the nations would see Israel’s statutes and call them a wise and understanding people (Deuteronomy 4:5–8), so Israel’s distinct life was itself a witness to the LORD.
Must Christians avoid mixed fabrics and mixed seed?
These laws belonged to the covenant God made with Israel through Moses, and Christians are free to wear blended cloth and to plant a mixed garden. Paul calls the ceremonial laws of that covenant a shadow of things to come, with the substance found in Christ (Colossians 2:17). The law did its work in bringing us to Christ (Galatians 3:24), who kept it perfectly and is “the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth” (Romans 10:4). When the apostles and elders met in Jerusalem, they settled that Gentile believers were under no obligation to keep the ceremonial law of Moses (Acts 15). Jesus gathered the whole law into love for God and love for our neighbour (Matthew 22:37–40).
What the laws taught still stands. Anyone in Christ is a new creature (2 Corinthians 5:17), and Paul asks what fellowship righteousness has with unrighteousness, or light with darkness (2 Corinthians 6:14). God’s people are now marked out by changed hearts and by the Holy Spirit who lives in them, and the call that opened this chapter is repeated to the church: be holy, for God is holy (1 Peter 1:15–16). The mixing to avoid today is the blending of God’s truth with the world’s values, and a faith professed in public joined to a different life in private.
The betrothed bondmaid
Verse 20 sets out a particular case. A man lies with a woman who is a bondmaid, shiphchâh, a female slave or maidservant. She is “betrothed to an husband”, promised to another man, and the Hebrew word is châraph in its sense of betrothal, which the lexicons keep apart from the like-spelled verb meaning to reproach. Her bondage continues. She has yet to be redeemed, that is bought out of her service, or given her freedom, so she still belongs to her master’s household.
Betrothal in Israel was a binding legal agreement, far weightier than a modern engagement. A betrothed woman already belonged to her future husband, and lying with her was treated as adultery. For a free woman the law is severe. Adultery with a married woman brought death to both the man and the woman (Leviticus 20:10, Deuteronomy 22:22), and the same penalty fell when a free betrothed woman was involved (Deuteronomy 22:23–24).
Why was the death penalty set aside?
The verse gives its own reason: “because she was not free.” A slave woman lacked the full legal standing of a free woman, and in her position her consent could easily be compromised by pressure she was unable to resist. The law weighs that. It still treats the act as sin, since “she shall be scourged” and the man must bring a costly offering, yet it says of both of them, “they shall not be put to death.” “Scourged” translates the noun biqqôreth, and the punishment is painful and shameful while sparing life. Justice here is fitted to the circumstances and to the real degree of guilt, and it shields a person with little power. This is the same God who does justice for the vulnerable (Deuteronomy 10:18).
Does this law approve of slavery?
This law regulates a servitude that already existed in Israel, and its purpose is justice for a person living inside it. Servitude in Israel usually came through debt or poverty, or through capture in war, and the law of Moses gave servants rights and protections (Exodus 21:2–11) that set their condition apart from the slavery of the surrounding nations and of later centuries. It does not present bondage as God’s ideal. The New Testament lays the ground for its end by teaching that slave and free are one in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:28).
The ram of the trespass offering
The man’s guilt is dealt with before God as well as before men. “He shall bring his trespass offering unto the LORD”, so although he has wronged the woman, her betrothed and her master, his sin is first of all against the LORD, Yᵉhôvâh, whose law he broke. The offering is “a ram”, ʾayil, a male sheep. The root sense of the word is strength, and a ram was a valuable animal, the standard one for a trespass offering (Leviticus 5:14–19). Its cost showed that making amends for this wrong was a serious matter.
How the trespass offering differs from the sin offering
The trespass offering, ʼâshâm (also spelled ʾāšām), is sometimes called the guilt offering. The sin offering, chaṭṭâʼâh, dealt chiefly with sins committed unintentionally, which defiled the worshipper or the sanctuary, and it cleansed that defilement. The trespass offering was for wrongs that violated another person’s rights, misused holy things or broke a trust, the kind of wrong that leaves a debt. It therefore went together with restitution. The offender restored what he had taken and added a fifth part to it (Leviticus 6:1–7, Numbers 5:6–8). In this case the man had violated another man’s betrothal, and the verses name the ram as what he must bring.
At the door of the tabernacle
The ram is brought “unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation”. The Hebrew name is ʾōhel môʿēd, from ohel, a tent, and mow’ed, an appointed time or place of meeting, so it is the tent of meeting, the movable sanctuary where God met with his people. Its door, pethach, the entrance, was the appointed place for presenting sacrifices (Leviticus 1:3). Coming there was a public act. The man had to come forward himself, own what he had done, and seek peace with God in the place God had named.
Atonement made and sin forgiven
Verse 22 completes the case. “The priest”, kôhên, the one appointed to officiate between God and the people, “shall make an atonement for him”. The verb is kâphar, to cover, and so to expiate or cancel. Atonement deals with the guilt that separates the sinner from a holy God, so that fellowship can be restored. God had given the blood of sacrifice for this purpose, because the life of the flesh is in the blood (Leviticus 17:11). The ram’s life was given in the place of the offender’s, and all of this is done “before the LORD”.
The verse then makes a promise: “the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him.” The verb çâlach means to forgive, pardon or spare, and it describes what God does. The priest carries out the rite and God grants the pardon, as he promised to do when atonement was made according to his word (Numbers 15:28). The words “which he hath done” come back in the promise, so the forgiveness reaches the very act that was committed. David knew the joy of it: “Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven” (Psalm 32:1).
Christ, our priest and our offering
The priest and the ram of these verses point forward to Jesus Christ. He is our great high priest (Hebrews 4:14), and he is also the sacrifice, “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Isaiah foretold that the LORD’s servant would give his soul as an offering for sin (Isaiah 53:10). The priests of Israel offered animals again and again, and that blood covered sin for a time. Christ entered the holy place once, by his own blood, and obtained eternal redemption, cleansing the conscience itself (Hebrews 9:11–14). He bore our sins in his own body (1 Peter 2:24), and he paid in full the debt that the trespass offering pictured, restoring what sin had taken away and reconciling us to God (Romans 5:10–11). In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins (Ephesians 1:7), and God made him to be sin for us so that we might be made righteous in him (2 Corinthians 5:21). The promise “shall be forgiven him” is now kept for ever for everyone who trusts in Christ.
Jesus also fulfils the law of the bondmaid. He taught that adultery begins in the heart, with the lustful look (Matthew 5:28). When a woman taken in adultery was brought to him, he joined justice with mercy, sparing her and sending her away to sin no more (John 8:1–11). And he came for people in bondage. All of us were slaves to sin (Romans 6:6), and Christ has redeemed us and set us free (Galatians 5:1), a freedom far greater than release from any earthly master.
What these laws show us of God
The God who gave these laws cares about the whole of life. He gave Israel signs of belonging to him in their herds, their fields and their clothes, and he calls his people now to be recognisably his in character and conduct. His justice is careful. He saw a slave woman whom others might have overlooked, weighed how little freedom she had, and guarded her life in his law. His forgiveness is specific too. The man in this case had done a real wrong to real people, and God gave him a way to come, a price to bring, and a clear word at the end that his sin was forgiven. Where we have wronged someone, the trespass offering teaches that turning to God goes together with putting things right with the person we hurt. And because Christ has offered himself, a believer who confesses a particular sin can rest on the same promise the Israelite heard at the door of the tabernacle.
Leviticus 19:19
“Ye shall keep my statutes.”
The heading over the three laws that follow. They are God’s commands, kept because Israel is his covenant people.
“Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind:”
To “gender” is to breed. “A diverse kind” is kilʼayim, two different kinds put together, and the law keeps each animal breeding after its kind.
“thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed:”
The same Hebrew word, kilʼayim, now applied to the crops. One field is to carry one kind of seed.
“neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.”
“Mingled” is again kilʼayim, joined here to shaʻaṭnêz, the name of one cloth, linen and wool together. The law concerns wearing it, so Israel carried the reminder on their own bodies.
Leviticus 19:20 This verse
“And whosoever lieth carnally with a woman,”
The law begins with the man and holds him responsible. “Lieth carnally” is the plain term for sexual intercourse.
“that is a bondmaid, betrothed to an husband,”
A shiphchâh, a female slave, who is promised (châraph) to another man. The two facts together make this a special case.
“and not at all redeemed, nor freedom given her;”
She has been neither bought out of her service nor set free, so her master still has authority over her.
“she shall be scourged;”
The KJV’s rendering of the noun biqqôreth. The act is punished as a real wrong.
“they shall not be put to death,”
“They” covers both the man and the woman. The penalty for adultery with a free woman is withheld.
“because she was not free.”
The stated ground of the ruling. Her bondage lessens her guilt in the eyes of the law.
Leviticus 19:21
“And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the LORD,”
The man brings it himself, and brings it to the LORD (Yᵉhôvâh), since every sin against a person is a sin against God.
“unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation,”
The entrance (pethach) of the tent of meeting, ʾōhel môʿēd, where offerings were presented in public.
“even a ram for a trespass offering.”
An ʾayil, a costly animal. The verse names the trespass offering, ʼâshâm, a second time, which fixes exactly which sacrifice this wrong requires.
Leviticus 19:22
“And the priest shall make an atonement for him”
The priest, kôhên, acts for the man. To make atonement is kâphar, to cover or expiate his guilt.
“with the ram of the trespass offering before the LORD”
The ram is the means and the LORD is the one before whom it is done.
“for his sin which he hath done:”
The offering answers one named, concrete act.
“and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him.”
Çâlach, to pardon. The passive “shall be forgiven” points to God as the one who forgives, in mercy, when atonement has been made as he appointed.
Last revised