TRV
Study This Verse
Commentary on Leviticus 15 verses 1–18
We have here the law concerning the ceremonial uncleanness that was contracted by running issues in men. It is called in the margin (Lev 15:2) the running of the reins: a very grievous and loathsome disease, which was, usually the effect and consequent of wantonness and uncleanness, and a dissolute course of life, filling men's bones with the sins of their youth, and leaving them to mourn at the last, when all the pleasures of their wickedness have vanished, and nothing remains but the pain and anguish of a rotten carcase and a wounded conscience. And what fruit has the sinner then of those things whereof he has so much reason to be ashamed? Rom 6:21. As modesty is an ornament of grace to the head and chains about the neck, so chastity is health to the navel and marrow to the bones; but uncleanness is a wound and dishonour, the consumption of the flesh and the body, and a sin which is often its own punishment more than any other. It was also sometimes inflicted by the righteous hand of God for other sins, as appears by David's imprecation of a curse upon the family of Joab, for the murder of Abner. Sa2 3:29, Let there not fail from the house of Joab one that hath an issue, or is a leper. A vile disease for vile deserts. Now whoever had this disease upon him, 1. He was himself unclean, Lev 15:2. He must not dare to come near the sanctuary, it was at his peril if he did, nor might he eat of the holy things. This signified the filthiness of sin, and of all the productions of our corrupt nature, which render us odious to God's holiness, and utterly unfit for communion with him. Out of a pure heart well kept are the issues of life (Pro 4:23), but out of an unclean heart comes that which is defiling, Mat 12:34, Mat 12:35. 2. He made every person and thing unclean that he touched, or that touched him, Lev 15:4-12. His bed, and his chair, and his saddle, and every thing that belonged to him, could not be touched without a ceremonial uncleanness contracted, which a man must remain conscious to himself of till sunset, and from which he could not be cleansed without washing his clothes, and bathing his flesh in water. This signified the contagion of sin, the danger we are in of being polluted by conversing with those that are polluted, and the need we have with the utmost circumspection to save ourselves from this untoward generation. 3. When he was cured of the disease, yet he could not be cleansed from the pollution without a sacrifice, for which he was to prepare himself by seven days' expectation after he was perfectly clear from his distemper, and by bathing in spring water, Lev 15:13-15. This signified the great gospel duties of faith and repentance, and the great gospel privileges of the application of Christ's blood to our souls for our justification and his grace for our sanctification. God has promised to sprinkle clean water upon us, and to cleanse us from all our filthiness, and has appointed us by repentance to wash and make ourselves clean: he has also provided a sacrifice of atonement, and requires us by faith to interest ourselves in that sacrifice; for it is the blood of Christ his Son that cleanses us from all sin, and by which atonement is made for us, that we may have admission into God's presence and may partake of his favour.
Continue studying Leviticus 15:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Leviticus 15:6 addresses the specific case of secondary contamination through sitting on an object previously used by a person suffering from a bodily discharge. This verse extends the purity regulations of Leviticus 15 beyond direct physical contact to encompass indirect transmission of ritual impurity through shared seating surfaces. The prescribed remedy — washing garments, bathing the entire body in water, and remaining ceremonially unclean until evening — mirrors the identical purification protocol given in the preceding verse for those who touch the afflicted person's bed. By addressing contamination through furniture and seating, this regulation reveals the comprehensive, almost epidemiological logic of Israel's purity code, which recognized that impurity could spread not only through person-to-person contact but through shared objects in communal life. The verse underscores the seriousness with which ancient Israel treated the boundary between clean and unclean, while simultaneously providing a gracious, time-limited path back to full participation in community worship.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse sits within a carefully structured sequence in Leviticus 15:1-15 that moves outward in concentric rings from the person with the discharge to all who come into secondary contact with him. Verses 4-5 establish that the afflicted man's bed and bedding transmit impurity to anyone who touches them; verse 6 extends this principle to seating; and verse 7 completes the pattern by addressing direct skin contact. The literary progression — bed, seat, body — covers the full range of domestic interaction, ensuring no avenue of contamination is overlooked. This chapter as a whole forms a chiastic parallel with Leviticus 13-14, which addresses skin diseases, both sections dealing with bodily conditions that render a person ritually unfit.
Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, bodily discharges were widely associated with spiritual danger and social stigma. Unlike neighboring cultures that often attributed such conditions to demonic possession requiring magical incantation, Israel's purity laws are remarkably hygienic and procedural — prescribing washing, waiting, and sacrificial restoration rather than exorcism. The emphasis on laundering clothes and bathing in water reflects practical sanitation wisdom embedded within a theological framework. Seating objects in Israelite homes were typically stone benches, woven mats, or wooden stools, all of which could harbor contamination, making this regulation both spiritually and practically meaningful in a communal, close-quarters living environment.
Key Themes: The dominant themes are the communicability of impurity, the gracious provision of purification, and the holiness of God's covenant community. The verse illustrates how uncleanness in ancient Israel was understood as a contagion that could spread through physical mediation — a concept that reinforced Israel's collective responsibility for maintaining the camp's sanctity before God (Leviticus 15:31). The time-bound nature of the impurity (lasting only until evening) reflects the theological conviction that uncleanness, while serious, is not permanent — restoration is always available through obedience to God's prescribed means.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
The verse presents a clear case law that builds upon the foundational principle established in verse 4: that objects used by the person with a discharge absorb ritual impurity and can transmit it to others. Where verse 5 addressed the bed — the place of most prolonged and intimate contact — verse 6 turns to the act of sitting, a more casual and public form of interaction. This escalation from private to semi-public contact demonstrates the thoroughness of the Levitical code: even incidental, everyday contact with a contaminated surface renders a person unclean. The threefold purification requirement — wash clothes, bathe body, wait until evening — appears as a formulaic refrain throughout this chapter, establishing a consistent and predictable standard that could be readily understood and applied by the entire community.
Key Word Analysis
sitteth (Hebrew, yâshab, H3427): From Strong's H3427, a primitive root meaning properly to sit down, and by implication to dwell or remain. In this context it denotes the physical act of occupying a seat, but its broader semantic range — encompassing settling and dwelling — hints at the idea that even temporary residence on a contaminated surface is sufficient to transfer impurity. The same root appears in Psalm 1:1 to describe sitting in the seat of scoffers, suggesting that what one associates with, even passively, leaves its mark.
wash (Hebrew, kâbaç, H3526): From Strong's H3526, a primitive root meaning to trample, and hence to wash by stamping with the feet, whether literally (including the fulling process) or figuratively. This is not a gentle rinsing but a vigorous, labor-intensive laundering — the garments must be thoroughly worked to remove contamination. The word is distinct from the term used for bathing the body, emphasizing that the Levitical code prescribed different cleansing actions appropriate to each material.
bathe (Hebrew, râchats, H7364): From Strong's H7364, a primitive root meaning to lave the whole or a part of a thing. Unlike kâbaç which applies to fabrics, râchats refers to washing the body itself. The use of both terms together — kâbaç for garments and râchats for the person — creates a comprehensive purification that addresses both the external coverings and the person underneath, leaving nothing untouched by the cleansing process.
Verse Breakdown
"And he that sitteth on any thing whereon he sat that hath the issue": The construction is deliberately precise, identifying a chain of contamination: the person with the discharge sat on an object, and now a second person sits on that same object. The phrase "any thing" (Hebrew kᵉlîy, H3627, meaning any prepared apparatus or vessel) broadens the scope beyond a single type of furniture to encompass any object designed for sitting. This prevents legalistic evasion — one cannot claim exemption because the object was a stool rather than a chair.
"shall wash his clothes": The mandatory washing of garments (Hebrew beged, H899, meaning a covering or clothing) indicates that impurity was understood to permeate even the outer layers that separated the person from the contaminated surface. The garments acted as a secondary vector, and their purification was essential to prevent the further spread of uncleanness to other surfaces and persons.
"and bathe himself in water": The requirement to bathe the entire body in water (Hebrew mayim, H4325) goes beyond surface-level decontamination. Full-body immersion or washing signified a comprehensive renewal, a symbolic return to a state of wholeness. Water here serves as the divinely appointed agent of ritual restoration, a motif that runs from the flood narrative through Israel's Red Sea crossing to the washing rituals of the priesthood.
"and be unclean until the even": Despite performing both washing actions, the person remains in a state of impurity until evening (Hebrew ʻereb, H6153, meaning dusk). This waiting period — from the moment of contamination and washing until sunset — served a dual purpose: it enforced a quarantine-like separation that prevented premature reentry into sacred spaces, and it aligned purification with the natural rhythm of the Jewish day, which began at sundown. The new day brought a new beginning and a restored status.
Literary Devices
The verse employs repetition as its primary literary device, echoing the exact purification formula found in verse 5 and verse 7 — "shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even" — creating a rhythmic, almost liturgical cadence that reinforces the universality of the standard. This anaphoric refrain across multiple verses serves a mnemonic function, making the law easy to remember and recite in an oral culture. The verse also uses specification as a rhetorical strategy: by moving from the general principle of contaminated objects (v. 4) to the specific case of sitting (v. 6), the text employs casuistic elaboration, a hallmark of ancient Near Eastern legal codes in which a general rule is followed by increasingly specific applications. The phrase "any thing whereon he sat" employs deliberate generalization within specificity — the situation is specific (sitting), but the object is left maximally broad, closing potential loopholes.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse illuminates the profound theological truth that impurity in Israel's covenant community was understood as transmissible, pervasive, and incompatible with the holiness of God who dwelt in their midst. The concern is not merely hygienic but deeply covenantal: because the tabernacle stood at the center of the camp, and because God's presence inhabited that tabernacle, every form of uncleanness posed a threat to the community's relationship with the Holy One (Leviticus 15:31). The graduated degrees of contamination — from the afflicted person, to objects, to secondary contacts — mirror the theological reality that sin's consequences radiate outward, affecting not only the sinner but the entire community. Yet the provision of purification through washing and the passage of time reveals God's grace: impurity is real and serious, but it is not irremediable. The evening boundary, marking the start of a new day in Hebrew reckoning, becomes a small resurrection — a daily experience of moving from uncleanness to cleanness, from exclusion to restoration.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The meticulous regulations of Leviticus 15:6 may seem distant from modern life, yet they carry enduring wisdom about the nature of moral and spiritual contamination. Just as sitting on an object once used by an unclean person was sufficient to transmit impurity, so too can casual, seemingly passive engagement with corrupting influences — entertainment, relationships, environments — leave an invisible but real mark on our spiritual condition. The verse teaches that we cannot assume neutrality: proximity to impurity affects us whether we intend it to or not. At the same time, the prescribed remedy offers profound encouragement. God did not leave the contaminated person in a hopeless state but provided clear, accessible steps for restoration. The washing of clothes and body speaks to the need for both external behavioral change and internal renewal, while the waiting period until evening teaches patience — purification is a process, not always instantaneous. In our own lives, the path back from moral failure or spiritual defilement often requires both decisive action (repentance, confession, changed behavior) and patient trust in God's timing for full restoration.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does sitting on an object make someone unclean, even if they did not directly touch the person with the discharge?
Answer: The Levitical purity system operated on the principle that ritual impurity could be transmitted through physical mediation — not only through direct person-to-person contact but through objects that absorbed contamination. The person with the discharge imparted impurity to the seating surface (Leviticus 15:4), and that surface then became a secondary vector. This reflects both a theological conviction that uncleanness is pervasive and contagious, and a practical wisdom about the spread of disease through shared surfaces. The regulation protected the community's ritual purity and, by extension, its access to God's presence in the tabernacle.
Why must the person remain unclean until evening even after washing?
Answer: The waiting period served multiple purposes. Practically, it enforced a period of separation that prevented the person from prematurely reentering sacred spaces or resuming normal community activities. Theologically, it aligned purification with the rhythm of the Hebrew day, which began at sunset. Evening marked not just the end of a day but the beginning of a new one, making the transition from unclean to clean a symbolic new beginning. This built-in delay also taught that purification is ultimately in God's hands and on God's timetable — human effort (washing) is necessary but not sufficient without the passage of God's appointed time.
Is the purification described here purely ceremonial, or does it have practical health implications?
Answer: Both dimensions are present and inseparable in the Levitical code. The washing of clothes and bathing in water would have had genuine sanitary benefits, particularly in a communal desert encampment where infectious discharges could spread rapidly. However, the regulations are framed entirely in ritual rather than medical language — the concern is with "clean" and "unclean" status before God, not with germs or infection. Modern readers should resist reducing these laws to mere ancient hygiene tips; they are fundamentally about maintaining the holiness of God's people in the presence of a holy God, even as they incidentally provided health protections that aligned with their theological purpose.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The elaborate purification rituals of Leviticus 15:6 find their ultimate fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who came not to abolish the law but to fulfill its deepest purpose (Matthew 5:17). Where the Levitical code required the contaminated person to undertake washing and endure a period of exclusion, Christ reverses the direction of transmission: rather than becoming defiled by contact with the unclean, his touch purifies. This is vividly demonstrated when Jesus touched the leper in Mark 1:40-42 — instead of Jesus becoming unclean, the leper became clean. The water that Leviticus prescribes for bodily purification points forward to the "washing of regeneration" described in Titus 3:5, and to Jesus' declaration that those who have been bathed need only wash their feet to be entirely clean (John 13:10). The evening boundary — the moment when impurity expires and cleanness is restored — foreshadows the evening of Good Friday, when Christ's death on the cross accomplished a once-for-all purification that no amount of ritual washing could achieve (Hebrews 10:10). Through his sacrifice, believers are no longer bound to repeated cycles of contamination and cleansing but are permanently made clean, with confident access to the presence of God that the Levitical system could only grant temporarily and conditionally (Hebrews 10:19-22).