Translation
See on the biblical-era map

In the KJVVerse 6,141 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on Joshua 12 verses 7–24
7 ¶ And these are the kings of the country which Joshua and the children of Israel smote on this side Jordan on the west, from Baalgad in the valley of Lebanon even unto the mount Halak, that goeth up to Seir; which Joshua gave unto the tribes of Israel for a possession according to their divisions;
8 In the mountains, and in the valleys, and in the plains, and in the springs, and in the wilderness, and in the south country; the Hittites, the Amorites, and the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites:
9 The king of Jericho, one; the king of Ai, which is beside Bethel, one;
10 The king of Jerusalem, one; the king of Hebron, one;
11 The king of Jarmuth, one; the king of Lachish, one;
12 The king of Eglon, one; the king of Gezer, one;
13 The king of Debir, one; the king of Geder, one;
14 The king of Hormah, one; the king of Arad, one;
15 The king of Libnah, one; the king of Adullam, one;
16 The king of Makkedah, one; the king of Bethel, one;
17 The king of Tappuah, one; the king of Hepher, one;
18 The king of Aphek, one; the king of Lasharon, one;
19 The king of Madon, one; the king of Hazor, one;
20 The king of Shimronmeron, one; the king of Achshaph, one;
21 The king of Taanach, one; the king of Megiddo, one;
22 The king of Kedesh, one; the king of Jokneam of Carmel, one;
23 The king of Dor in the coast of Dor, one; the king of the nations of Gilgal, one;
24 The king of Tirzah, one: all the kings thirty and one.
We have here a breviate of Joshua's conquests.
I. The limits of the country he conquered. It lay between Jordan on the east and the Mediterranean Sea on the west, and extended from Baal-gad near Lebanon in the north to Halak, which lay upon the country of Edom in the south, v. 7. The boundaries are more largely described, Num 34:2, etc. But what is here said is enough to show that God had been as good as his word, and had given them possession of all he had promised them by Moses, if they would but have kept it.
II. The various kinds of land that were found in this country, which contributed both to its pleasantness and to its fruitfulness, Jos 12:8. There were mountains, not craggy, and rocky, and barren, which are frightful to the traveller and useless to the inhabitants, but fruitful hills, such as put forth precious things (Deu 33:15), which charmed the spectator's eye and filled the owner's hand. And valleys, not mossy and boggy, but covered with corn, Psa 65:13. There were plains, and springs to water them; and even in that rich land there were wildernesses too, or forests, which were not so thickly inhabited as other parts, yet had towns and houses in them, but served as foils to set off the more pleasant and fruitful countries.
III. The several nations that had been in possession of this country - Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, etc., all of them descended from Canaan, the accursed son of Ham, Gen 10:15-18. Seven nations they are called (Deu 7:1), and so many are there reckoned up, but here six only are mentioned, the Girgashites being either lost or left out, though we find them, Gen 10:16 and Gen 15:21. Either they were incorporated with some other of these nations, or, as the tradition of the Jews is, upon the approach of Israel under Joshua they all withdrew and went into Africa, leaving their country to be possessed by Israel, with whom they saw it was to no purpose to contend, and therefore they are not named among the nations that Joshua subdued.
IV. A list of the kings that were conquered and subdued by the sword of Israel, some in the field, others in their own cities, thirty-one in all, and very particularly named and counted, it should seem, in the order in which they were conquered; for the catalogue begins with the kings of Jericho and Ai, then takes in the king of Jerusalem and the princes of the south that were in confederacy with him, and then proceeds to those of the northern association. Now, 1. This shows what a very fruitful country Canaan then was, which could support so many kingdoms, and in which so many kings chose to throng together rather than disperse themselves into other countries, which we may suppose not yet inhabited, but where, though they might find more room, they could not expect such plenty and pleasure: this was the land God spied out for Israel; and yet at this day it is one of the most barren, despicable, and unprofitable countries in the world: such is the effect of the curse it lies under, since its possessors rejected Christ and his gospel, as was foretold by Moses, Deu 29:23. 2. It shows what narrow limits men's ambition was then confined to. These kings contented themselves with the government, each of them, of one city and the towns and villages that pertained to it; and no one of them, for aught that appears, aimed to make himself master of the rest, but, when there was occasion, all united for the common safety. Yet it should seem that what was wanting in the extent of their territories was made up in the absoluteness of their power, their subjects being all their tenants and vassals, and entirely at their command. 3. It shows how good God was to Israel, in giving them victory over all these kings, and possession of all these kingdoms, and what obligations he hereby laid upon them to observe his statutes and to keep his laws, Psa 105:44, Psa 105:45. Here were thirty-one kingdoms, or seigniories, to be divided among nine tribes and a half of Israel. Of these there fell to the lot of Judah the kingdoms of Hebron, Jarmuth, Lachish, Eglon, Debir, Arad, Libnan, and Adullam, eight in all, besides part of the kingdom of Jerusalem and part of Geder. Benjamin had the kingdoms of Jericho, Ai, Jerusalem, Makkedah, Beth-el, and the nations of Gilgal, six in all. Simeon had the kingdom of Hormah and part of Geder. Ephraim had the kingdoms of Gezer and Tirzah. Manasseh (that half-tribe) had the kingdoms of Tappuah and Hepher, Taanach and Megiddo. Asher had the kingdoms of Aphek and Achshaph. Zebulun had the kingdoms of Lasharon, Shimron-meron, and Jokneam. Naphtali had the kingdoms of Madon, Hazor, and Kedesh. And Issachar had that of Dor. These were some of the great and famous kings that God smote, for his mercy endureth for ever; and gave their land for a heritage, even a heritage unto Israel his servant, for his mercy endureth for ever, Psa 136:17, etc.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–24. Public domain.
Copy as
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN 6.21-22
And if “a wise man shall understand the words from his own mouth and shall hear knowledge on his lips,” we must either declare rashly that the prophets were not wise, if they have not understood “the words from their own mouth,” or admit that the prophets were wise, because they have received what is correct and true and have understood “the words from their own mouth” and borne knowledge on their lips. It is clear that Moses saw in his mind the truth of the law and the allegorical meanings related to the anagogical sense of the stories he recorded, and that Joshua understood the true distribution of land which took place after the overthrow of the twenty-nine kings, since he could see better than us that the things accomplished through himself were shadows of certain realities.
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 19.8
Whoever believes in me will also do the works which I do, and will do even greater ones. And where is this word which he said, “The disciple is not greater than his master” [illustrated]? For example, Moses killed only three kings, but Joshua killed thirty. [Moses] persevered in prayer, made supplication, but did not enter [the promised land]. It was Joshua rather who entered and shared out the inheritance. Likewise, Samuel was greater than Eli, and Elisha received a double portion of his master’s spirit after his ascension, like the Lord our Savior, for his disciples effected twice through their signs.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Joshua 12:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Joshua 12:10 is a concise entry within a comprehensive list enumerating the thirty-one kings defeated by the Israelites under Joshua's leadership during their conquest of Canaan. This specific verse highlights the vanquished rulers of two strategically vital cities in the southern campaign: Jerusalem and Hebron. Far from a mere historical record, this meticulous catalog serves as a powerful testament to God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises to Israel, demonstrating the extensive scope of the land secured through divine intervention and military might.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Joshua 12:10, as part of a larger list, primarily employs Enumeration and Repetition. The entire chapter is an extended enumeration, systematically listing each defeated king and their city. This device serves to underscore the completeness and thoroughness of the conquest, leaving no doubt about the extent of Israel's victories and the fulfillment of God's promise to give them the land. The repetition of "one" after each king's designation (e.g., "the king of Jerusalem, one; the king of Hebron, one;") emphasizes the individual defeat of each distinct political entity, reinforcing the idea of a comprehensive and decisive victory over a multitude of independent powers. This repetitive structure also lends a rhythmic, almost litany-like quality to the text, solidifying the historical record and the undeniable fulfillment of divine promises. The chapter also functions as a form of Summary, providing a concise and authoritative overview of the preceding military narratives, validating the success of the initial phase of the conquest.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Joshua 12:10, though seemingly a dry list, is profoundly theological. It stands as a powerful testament to God's unwavering faithfulness and His active involvement in human history. The defeat of these formidable kings, especially those from strategic cities like Jerusalem and Hebron, was not merely a result of Israel's military prowess but a direct fulfillment of God's covenant promises to give Abraham's descendants the land of Canaan. It demonstrates God's righteous judgment against the wickedness of the Canaanite nations and His sovereign power to clear the way for His chosen people to inherit their promised dwelling. This verse, therefore, is a micro-illustration of God's grand redemptive plan unfolding, where His word proves true and His purposes are accomplished through His appointed leaders. It highlights that the land was not taken by Israel's might, but was a divine gift, secured by divine intervention.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Joshua 12:10, despite its brevity and seemingly mundane nature as a list, offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It is a powerful reminder that God is meticulously faithful to His promises, even when their fulfillment requires overcoming seemingly insurmountable obstacles. Just as He systematically dismantled the strongholds of Canaanite power to establish Israel in their inheritance, so too does God work to overcome the spiritual strongholds in our lives and in the world, enabling us to walk in the freedom and inheritance He has prepared for us. This verse encourages us to trust in God's sovereign power and His perfect timing, knowing that He is actively working out His purposes, even through challenging circumstances. It calls us to recognize that our victories, whether personal or corporate, are ultimately His doing, and that His word will always stand true, bringing about His intended outcomes. This historical record serves as an anchor for faith, assuring us that the God who delivered Israel is the same God who will deliver us and fulfill every promise He has made.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is Jerusalem listed here if it wasn't fully conquered by Joshua?
Answer: While Jerusalem (then Jebus) was not fully captured and occupied by Israel during Joshua's initial campaigns, its king, Adoni-zedek, was decisively defeated and executed by Joshua in the southern campaign detailed in Joshua 10. This victory broke the power of Jerusalem's leadership and effectively neutralized its threat, even if the city itself remained a Jebusite stronghold for a time. The list in Joshua 12 focuses on the defeat of the kings, representing the dismantling of their authority and military capacity, rather than necessarily the immediate and complete occupation of every single city. The full capture of Jerusalem by Israel would only occur centuries later under King David (2 Samuel 5:6-9). This distinction highlights that the conquest was a process, not a single event, and Joshua's primary mission was to break the power of the land's rulers.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The systematic conquest of the Canaanite kings, epitomized by the defeat of the kings of Jerusalem and Hebron in Joshua 12:10, profoundly foreshadows the ultimate victory of Jesus Christ. Just as Joshua led Israel to conquer earthly kings and establish their inheritance, so Christ, the greater Joshua, came to conquer the spiritual powers of darkness and secure an eternal inheritance for His people. The kings of Canaan represent the forces of evil, sin, and death that held humanity captive. Christ's death on the cross and His resurrection were the decisive battles, defeating Satan (Colossians 2:15), sin (Romans 6:6), and death (1 Corinthians 15:54-57). His kingdom is not of this world, yet it is established by His supreme authority over all earthly and spiritual rulers (Ephesians 1:20-23). The promised land, secured through the defeat of these kings, points to the spiritual rest and eternal dwelling believers find in Christ, who has secured our true inheritance in the heavenly places (Ephesians 1:3) by triumphing over every hostile power and establishing His eternal reign.