मुख्य मजकुरावर जा

John 4:44

“Jesus Returns to Galilee”· John 4:43–45Read in context
King James Version
For Jesus himself testified, that a prophet hath no honour in his own country.
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 Jesus G2424 himself G846 testified G3140, that G3754 a prophet G4396 hath G2192 no G3756 honour G5092 in G1722 his own G2398 country G3968.
Complete Jewish Bible
Now Yeshua himself said, “A prophet is not respected in his own country.”
Berean Standard Bible
Now He Himself had testified that a prophet has no honor in his own hometown.
American Standard Version
For Jesus himself testified, that a prophet hath no honor in his own country.
World English Bible Messianic
For Yeshua himself testified that a prophet has no honor in his own country.
Geneva Bible (1599)
For Iesus himselfe had testified, that a Prophet hath none honour in his owne countrey.
Young's Literal Translation
for Jesus himself testified that a prophet in his own country shall not have honour;
मराठी · MRCV
कारण येशूंनी स्वतः स्पष्टपणे सांगितले होते की, संदेष्ट्याला स्वतःच्या देशात मान मिळत नाही.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' Journey through Samaria
Jesus' Journey through Samaria View full PDF
John 4:43-54, Acts 7:54-8:2
John 4:43-54, Acts 7:54-8:2 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,201 of 31,102 · 84.2%

Study this verse

Summary

John 4:44 presents Jesus' profound observation, either stated by Him or noted by the evangelist, that a prophet typically receives little honor in his own homeland. This verse serves as a crucial transitional statement, explaining Jesus' deliberate move from the receptive Samaritans to Galilee, where He anticipated a different, more skeptical reception from those familiar with His upbringing. It encapsulates a universal truth about the challenges faced by divine messengers, highlighting the human tendency to dismiss truth when it comes from a familiar source, and underscores Jesus' unwavering commitment to His mission despite anticipated rejection.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows Jesus' highly fruitful two-day ministry in Samaria, where many Samaritans believed in Him, declaring Him "the Savior of the world" (John 4:39-42). The evangelist John uses verse 44 as an explanatory bridge, clarifying Jesus' decision to depart for Galilee despite the Samaritans' eager reception. It sets up the narrative for Jesus' return to Galilee, specifically Cana, where He performs His second sign in that region (John 4:46-54). The statement foreshadows the mixed reception Jesus would continue to face among His own people, contrasting sharply with the openness encountered among the Samaritans, thereby emphasizing a key Johannine theme of light coming into darkness, and the world not knowing Him (John 1:5 and John 1:10-11).

Historical & Cultural Context

The concept that a prophet is not honored in his own country was a well-known proverb in ancient Jewish society, reflecting a common human experience. Jesus Himself likely grew up in Nazareth, a small, unremarkable town in Galilee. Familiarity often bred contempt or, at best, a lack of awe. People in His "own country" (likely referring to Galilee, or more specifically Nazareth) would have known Him as Joseph's son, the carpenter, and would have struggled to reconcile His humble origins with His extraordinary claims and miraculous power. This cultural predisposition made it difficult for them to accept Him as a divine messenger, let alone the Messiah. The historical context also includes the Jewish expectation of a Messiah, often envisioned as a political or military leader, which Jesus' humble appearance and spiritual teachings did not immediately align with for many.

Key Themes

John 4:44 contributes to several significant themes within the Gospel of John and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it highlights the nature of prophetic ministry and the inherent challenges faced by those who deliver God's truth, often encountering skepticism and rejection, particularly from those closest to them. Secondly, it underscores the theme of divine sovereignty over human reception; Jesus' mission was not contingent on human honor or acceptance, but on the Father's will (John 4:34). Thirdly, it implicitly contrasts the varied responses to God's truth, showcasing the unexpected openness of the Samaritans versus the anticipated resistance from the Jewish people in His homeland. This sets the stage for the ongoing tension between belief and unbelief that permeates John's Gospel, where Jesus' identity and claims are constantly tested and often rejected by those who should have recognized Him (John 1:11).

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

testified martyréō' G3140

From martys (witness), this verb means "to be a witness" or "to testify." It indicates a solemn declaration based on personal experience or knowledge. Here, it underscores that Jesus Himself, from His own lived experience, affirmed this truth about prophetic reception. The use of "testified" is significant in John's Gospel, where Jesus consistently bears witness to the truth and to the Father (John 3:11, John 5:31-32).

prophet prophḗtēs' G4396

Derived from pro (before, forth) and phēmi (to speak), a prophet is literally "one who speaks forth" on behalf of God. This term encompasses not only foretelling the future but primarily forth-telling God's message, acting as His spokesperson. Jesus identifies Himself with this role, even though He is far greater than any mere prophet. The lack of honor for a prophet in his own country highlights the difficulty people have in accepting divine authority from someone familiar.

honour timḗ' G5092

This word signifies value, esteem, respect, or dignity. It can refer to the price paid for something or the reverence given to someone. In this context, it denotes the respect, recognition, and acceptance due to a prophet for his divine message and authority. The absence of timḗ implies a dismissal or devaluation of the prophet's person and message by those who should know him best.

country patrís' G3968

Meaning "fatherland" or "native town," this term refers to one's homeland or place of origin. For Jesus, this primarily meant Nazareth, and by extension, the region of Galilee. The intimate familiarity of one's "countrymen" often paradoxically leads to a lack of proper respect or recognition for extraordinary individuals, as their origins are seen as too mundane for divine revelation.

Verse Breakdown

"For Jesus himself testified,"

This opening clause, introduced by "For" (G1063, gár), provides the reason or explanation for Jesus' subsequent actions (moving to Galilee). The phrase "Jesus himself testified" emphasizes the personal authority and experiential basis of the statement. It is not merely a common proverb, but a truth affirmed by Jesus' own life and ministry, giving it profound weight.

"that a prophet hath no honour"

This is the core assertion. It declares a universal principle: a prophet, someone sent by God to deliver His message, often struggles to gain the respect and recognition that his divine commission warrants. The phrase "hath no honour" (G2192 echō G3756 ou G5092 timḗ) conveys a strong negative, indicating a complete absence of the due esteem.

"in his own country."

This specifies the particular context where this lack of honor is most acutely felt. "His own country" (G1722 en G2398 ídios G3968 patrís) refers to the prophet's native land or community. The familiarity of one's upbringing, family, and local reputation often overshadows the divine authority and message, leading people to dismiss the prophet as "just one of us."

Literary Devices

John 4:44 employs several significant literary devices. Primarily, it functions as a Proverbial Statement, reflecting a common, widely recognized truth about human nature and the reception of extraordinary individuals within their familiar surroundings. This proverb is given particular weight as it is either uttered or affirmed by Jesus Himself, making it an Authoritative Pronouncement. There is a strong element of Irony present; the very people who should have been most receptive to their own Messiah, having witnessed His upbringing and perhaps even His early signs, are precisely those who struggle to honor Him. Furthermore, the verse serves as Foreshadowing, setting the stage for Jesus' subsequent rejections in Galilee and Judea, particularly in His hometown of Nazareth, as detailed in the Synoptic Gospels. This statement also creates a Contrast with the preceding narrative of the Samaritans' eager belief, highlighting the unexpected places where God's truth finds fertile ground versus the resistant soil of familiarity.

Theological and Thematic Connections

John 4:44 reveals a profound theological truth about the nature of divine revelation and human reception. God often chooses to work through seemingly ordinary individuals and in unexpected ways, challenging human preconceptions and pride. The consistent pattern of prophets being rejected in their own time and place, culminating in Jesus' own experience, underscores humanity's inherent resistance to God's authoritative word, especially when it disrupts comfortable norms or comes from a source deemed too familiar. This resistance is not merely a social phenomenon but a spiritual one, reflecting a deeper unwillingness to submit to divine authority. Yet, despite this rejection, God's purposes prevail, and His messengers continue to bear witness, demonstrating that divine validation far surpasses human approval.

Reflection and Application

John 4:44 offers enduring lessons for believers navigating the complexities of sharing their faith and living out their calling. It reminds us that the path of prophetic witness, whether in formal ministry or daily life, is often met with skepticism, indifference, or outright rejection, particularly from those within our closest circles—family, friends, or long-term acquaintances. We should not be surprised or discouraged when our efforts to speak truth, live righteously, or serve God are not met with the honor or acceptance we might desire from those who know us best. Instead, this verse encourages a humble perseverance, recognizing that our ultimate validation comes from God, not from human applause. It challenges us to examine our own hearts: are we open to truth, even when it comes from an unexpected or familiar source, or do we allow familiarity to breed contempt? Ultimately, our mission, like Jesus', is to faithfully declare God's truth, trusting Him with the outcome, knowing that His kingdom advances not by human recognition, but by divine power.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of your life might you be prone to devalue or dismiss truth because of its familiar source?
  2. How does Jesus' example of pressing on despite anticipated rejection encourage you in your own calling or witness?
  3. What does it mean for your spiritual life to seek God's approval above human honor or acceptance?
  4. How can you cultivate a heart that is more open to God's work, even when it manifests in unexpected people or places?

FAQ

Why did Jesus go to Galilee if He knew He wouldn't be honored there?

Jesus' decision to go to Galilee, despite knowing He would not be honored there, underscores His unwavering commitment to His divine mission and the Father's will, rather than seeking human recognition or comfort. His purpose was to proclaim the good news of the kingdom throughout all of Israel, not just in places where He was well-received. The Gospel of John consistently portrays Jesus as intentionally fulfilling His Father's plan, regardless of the obstacles or personal cost (John 4:34). His journey to Galilee was part of a strategic itinerary, leading Him to Cana where He would perform another significant sign, demonstrating His glory (John 4:46-54). This act highlights His obedience and the principle that God's work often progresses through challenging circumstances, not just through easy acceptance.

Is this verse only about Jesus, or does it apply to others?

While John 4:44 is directly stated in the context of Jesus' own experience, it expresses a universal proverb that applies broadly to prophets, messengers of God, and even individuals who bring significant truth or change within their own communities. The Synoptic Gospels record Jesus explicitly applying this proverb to Himself when He was rejected in His hometown of Nazareth (Matthew 13:57, Mark 6:4, Luke 4:24). This principle extends to anyone who seeks to live out or proclaim God's truth, particularly to those who have known them intimately. Familiarity can sometimes lead to a lack of respect or a reluctance to acknowledge divine authority in a person.

What does "his own country" specifically refer to in this context?

While "his own country" (Greek: patrís) can broadly refer to one's native land, in the context of Jesus, it primarily refers to Galilee, and more specifically, to His hometown of Nazareth. Jesus grew up in Nazareth, and the people there knew Him as Joseph's son, the carpenter (Mark 6:3). This intimate familiarity often led to a dismissal of His divine claims and authority. The contrast is drawn with the Samaritans, who were "outsiders" to Jewish society but were remarkably open to Jesus' message, demonstrating that God's truth is not bound by human expectations or geographical boundaries.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

John 4:44, while a seemingly simple proverb, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the very life, ministry, and ultimate sacrifice of Jesus. He is the ultimate Prophet, not merely speaking God's words, but embodying them as the Word made flesh (John 1:1). Yet, He was indeed "without honor in His own country," a truth tragically demonstrated by His rejection by the Jewish leadership and many of His own people, who ultimately cried out for His crucifixion (John 19:15). This rejection, far from being a failure, was central to God's redemptive plan. The "dishonor" Jesus endured—the mockery, the scourging, the cross—was the very means by which He secured honor and salvation for all humanity. His suffering and death, prophesied in passages like Isaiah 53:3, reveal that God's greatest work of salvation was accomplished not through human acclaim, but through the profound humility and self-emptying of the Son (Philippians 2:7-8). By embracing the path of dishonor, Jesus opened the way for us to receive true honor and eternal life in Him, becoming the "author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, despising the shame" (Hebrews 12:2). His rejection by His own people ultimately paved the way for the Gospel to extend to the Gentiles, fulfilling God's universal redemptive purpose.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers John 4:43–54. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 12 verses
Passage under commentJohn 4:43–54
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In these verses we have,

I.Christ's coming into Galilee, Joh 4:43.

Though he was as welcome among the Samaritans as he could be any where, and had better success, yet after two days he left them, not so much because they were Samaritans, and he would not confirm those in their prejudices against him who said, He is a Samaritan (Joh 8:48), but because he must preach to other cities, Luk 4:43. He went into Galilee, for there he spent much of his time. Now see here,

1.Whither Christ went; into Galilee, into the country of Galilee, but not to Nazareth, which was strictly his own country. He went among the villages, but declined going to Nazareth, the head city, for a reason here given, which Jesus himself testified, who knew the temper of his countrymen, the hearts of all men, and the experiences of all prophets, and it is this, That a prophet has no honour in his own country. Note,

(1.)Prophets ought to have honour, because God has put honour upon them and we do or may receive benefit by them.

(2.)The honour due to the Lord's prophets has very often been denied them, and contempt put upon them.

(3.)This due honour is more frequently denied them in their own country; see Luk 4:24; Mat 13:57. Not that it is universally true (no rule but has some exceptions), but it holds for the most part. Joseph, when he began to be a prophet, was most hated by his brethren; David was disdained by his brother (Sa1 17:28); Jeremiah was maligned by the men of Anathoth (Jer 11:21), Paul by his countrymen the Jews; and Christ's near kinsmen spoke most slightly of him, Joh 7:5. Men's pride and envy make them scorn to be instructed by those who once were their school-fellows and play-fellows. Desire of novelty, and of that which is far-fetched and dear-bought, and seems to drop out of the sky to them, makes them despise those persons and things which they have been long used to and know the rise of.

(4.)It is a great discouragement to a minister to go among a people who have no value for him or his labours. Christ would not go to Nazareth, because he knew how little respect he should have there.

(5.)It is just with God to deny his gospel to those that despise the ministers of it. They that mock the messengers forfeit the benefit of the message. Mat 21:35, Mat 21:41.

2.What entertainment he met with among the Galileans in the country (Joh 4:45): They received him, bade him welcome, and cheerfully attended on his doctrine. Christ and his gospel are not sent in vain; if they have not honour with some, they shall have with others. Now the reason given why these Galileans were so ready to receive Christ is because they had seen the miracles he did at Jerusalem, Joh 4:45. Observe,

(1.)They went up to Jerusalem at the feast, the feast of the passover. The Galileans lay very remote from Jerusalem, and their way thither lay through the country of the Samaritans, which was troublesome for a Jew to pass through, worse than Baca's valley of old; yet, in obedience to God's command, they went up to the feast, and there they became acquainted with Christ. Note, They that are diligent and constant in attending on public ordinances some time or other meet with more spiritual benefit than they expect.

(2.)At Jerusalem they saw Christ's miracles, which recommended him and his doctrine very much to their faith and affections. The miracles were wrought for the benefit of those at Jerusalem; yet the Galileans who were accidentally there got more advantage by them than they did for whom they were chiefly designed. Thus the word preached to a mixed multitude may perhaps edify occasional hearers more than the constant auditory.

3.What city he went to. When he would go to a city, he chose to go to Cana of Galilee, where he had made the water wine (Joh 4:46); thither he went, to see if there were any good fruits of that miracle remaining; and, if there were, to confirm their faith, and water what he had planted. The evangelist mentions this miracle here to teach us to keep in remembrance what we have seen of the works of Christ.

II.His curing the nobleman's son that was sick of a fever.

This story is not recorded by any other of the evangelists; it comes in Mat 4:23.

Observe, 1. Who the petitioner was, and who the patient: the petitioner was a nobleman; the patient was his son: There was a certain nobleman. Regulus (so the Latin), a little king; so called, either for the largeness of his estate, or the extent of his power, or the royalties that belonged to his manor. Some understand it as denoting his preferment - he was a courtier in some office about the king; others as denoting his party - he was an Herodian, a royalist, a prerogative-man, one that espoused the interests of the Herods, father and son; perhaps it was Chuza, Herod's steward (Luk 8:3), or Manaen, Herod's foster-brother, Act 13:1. There were saints in Caesar's household. The father a nobleman, and yet the son sick; for dignities and titles of honour will be no security to persons and families from the assaults of sickness and death. It was fifteen miles from Capernaum where this nobleman lived to Cana, where Christ now was; yet this affliction in his family sent him so far to Christ.

2.How the petitioner made his application to the physician. Having heard that Jesus was come out of Judea to Galilee, and finding that he did not come towards Capernaum, but turned off towards the other side of the country, he went to him himself, and besought him to come and heal his son, Joh 4:47. See here,

(1.)His tender affection to his son, that when he was sick he would spare no pains to get help for him.

(2.)His great respect to our Lord Jesus, that he would come himself to wait upon him, when he might have sent a servant; and that he besought him, when, as a man in authority, some would think he might have ordered his attendance. The greatest men, when they come to God, must become beggars, and sue sub forma pauperis - as paupers. As to the errand he came upon, we may observe a mixture in his faith.

[1.]There was sincerity in it; he did believe that Christ could heal his son, though his disease was dangerous. It is probable he had physicians to him, who had given him over; but he believed that Christ could cure him when the case seemed deplorable.

[2.]Yet there was infirmity in his faith; he believed that Christ could heal his son, but, as it should seem, he thought he could not heal him at a distance, and therefore he besought him that he would come down and heal him, expecting, as Naaman did, that he would come and strike his hand over the patient, as if he could not cure him but by a physical contact. Thus we are apt to limit the Holy One of Israel, and to stint him to our forms. The centurion, a Gentile, a soldier, was so strong in faith as to say, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof, Mat 8:8. This nobleman, a Jew, must have Christ to come down, though it was a good day's journey, and despairs of a cure unless he come down, as if he must teach Christ how to work. We are encouraged to pray, but we are not allowed to prescribe: Lord, heal me; but, whether with a word or a touch, thy will be done.

3.The gentle rebuke he met with in this address (Joh 4:48): Jesus said to him, "I see how it is; except you see signs and wonders, you will not believe, as the Samaritans did, though they saw no signs and wonders, and therefore I must work miracles among you." Though he was a nobleman, and now in grief about his son, and had shown great respect to Christ in coming so far to him, yet Christ gives him a reproof. Men's dignity in the world shall not exempt them from the rebukes of the word or providence; for Christ reproves not after the hearing of his ears, but with equity, Isa 11:3, Isa 11:4. Observe, Christ first shows him his sin and weakness, to prepare him for mercy, and then grants his request. Those whom Christ intends to honour with his favours he first humbles with his frowns. The Comforter shall first convince. Herod longed to see some miracle (Luk 23:8), and this courtier was of the same mind, and the generality of the people too. Now that which is blamed is,

(1.)That, whereas they had heard by credible and incontestable report of the miracles he had wrought in other places, they would not believe except they saw them with their own eyes, Luk 4:23. They must be honoured, and they must be humoured, or they will not be convinced. Their country must be graced, and their curiosity gratified, with signs and wonders, or else, though the doctrine of Christ be sufficiently proved by miracles wrought elsewhere, they will not believe. Like Thomas, they will yield to no method of conviction but what they shall prescribe.

(2.)That, whereas they had seen divers miracles, the evidence of which they could not gainsay, but which sufficiently proved Christ to be a teacher come from God, and should now have applied themselves to him for instruction in his doctrine, which by its native excellency would have gently led them on, in believing, to a spiritual perfection, instead of this they would go no further in believing than they were driven by signs and wonders. The spiritual power of the word did not affect them, did not attract them, but only the sensible power of miracles, which were for those who believe not, while prophesying was for those that believe, Co1 14:22. Those that admire miracles only, and despise prophesying, rank themselves with unbelievers.

4.His continued importunity in his address (Joh 4:49): Sir, come down ere my child die. Kurie - Lord; so it should be rendered. In this reply of his we have,

(1.)Something that was commendable: he took the reproof patiently; he spoke to Christ respectfully. Though he was one of those that wore soft clothing, yet he could bear reproof. It is none of the privileges of peerage to be above the reproofs of the word of Christ; but it is a sign of a good temper and disposition in men, especially in great men, when they can be told of their faults and not be angry. And, as he did not take the reproof for an affront, so he did not take it for a denial, but still prosecuted his request, and continued to wrestle till he prevailed. Nay, he might argue thus: "If Christ heal my soul, surely he will heal my son; if he cure my unbelief, he will cure his fever." This is the method Christ takes, first to work upon us, and then to work for us; and there is hope if we find him entering upon this method.

(2.)Something that was blameworthy, that was his infirmity; for,

[1.]He seems to take no notice of the reproof Christ gave him, says nothing to it, by way either of confession or of excuse, for he is so wholly taken up with concern about his child that he can mind nothing else. Note, The sorrow of the world is a great prejudice to our profiting by the word of Christ. Inordinate care and grief are thorns that choke the good seed; see Exo 6:9.

[2.]He still discovered the weakness of his faith in the power of Christ. First, He must have Christ to come down, thinking that else he could do the child no kindness. It is hard to persuade ourselves that distance of time and place are no obstructions to the knowledge and power of our Lord Jesus; yet so it is: he sees afar off, for his word, the word of his power, runs very swiftly. Secondly, He believes that Christ could heal a sick child, but not that he could raise a dead child, and therefore, "O come down, ere my child die," as if then it would be too late; whereas Christ has the same power over death that he has over bodily diseases. He forgot that Elijah and Elisha had raised dead children; and is Christ's power inferior to theirs? Observe what haste he is in: Come down, ere my child die; as if there were danger of Christ's slipping his time. He that believeth does not make haste, but refers himself to Christ. "Lord, what and when and how thou pleasest."

5.The answer of peace which Christ gave to his request at last (Joh 4:50): Go thy way, thy son liveth. Christ here gives us an instance,

(1.)Of his power, that he not only could heal, but could heal with so much ease, without the trouble of a visit. Here is nothing said, nothing done, nothing ordered to be done, and yet the cure wrought: Thy son liveth. The healing beams of the Sun of righteousness dispense benign influences from one end of heaven to another, and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof. Though Christ is now in heaven, and his church on earth, he can send from above. This nobleman would have Christ come down and heal his son; Christ will heal his son, and not come down. And thus the cure is the sooner wrought, the nobleman's mistake rectified, and his faith confirmed; so that the thing was better done in Christ's way. When he denies what we ask, he gives what is much more to our advantage; we ask for ease, he gives patience. Observe, His power was exerted by his word. In saying, Thy son lives, he showed that he has life in himself, and power to quicken whom he will. Christ's saying, Thy soul lives, makes it alive.

(2.)Of his pity; he observed the nobleman to be in pain about his son, and his natural affection discovered itself in that word, Ere my child, my dear child, die; and therefore Christ dropped the reproof, and gave him assurance of the recovery of his child; for he knows how a father pities his children.

6.The nobleman's belief of the word of Christ: He believed, and went away. Though Christ did not gratify him so far as to go down with him, he is satisfied with the method Christ took, and reckons he has gained his point. How quickly, how easily, is that which is lacking in our faith perfected by the word and power of Christ. Now he sees no sign or wonder, and yet believes the wonder done.

(1.)Christ said, Thy son liveth, and the man believed him; not only believed the omniscience of Christ, that he knew the child had recovered, but the omnipotence of Christ, that the cure was effected by his word. He left him dying; yet, when Christ said, He lives, like the father of the faithful, against hope he believed in hope, and staggered not through unbelief.

(2.)Christ said, Go thy way; and, as an evidence of the sincerity of his faith, he went his way, and gave neither Christ nor himself any further disturbance. He did not press Christ to come down, did not say, "If he do recover, yet a visit will be acceptable;" no, he seems no further solicitous, but, like Hannah, he goes his way, and his countenance is no more sad. As one entirely satisfied, he made no great haste home; did not hurry home that night, but returned leisurely, as one that was perfectly easy in his own mind.

7.The further confirmation of his faith, by comparing notes with his servants at his return.

(1.)His servants met him with the agreeable news of the child's recovery, Joh 4:51. Probably they met him not far from his own house, and, knowing what their master's cares were, they were willing as soon as they could to make him easy. David's servants were loth to tell him when the child was dead. Christ said, Thy son liveth; and now the servants say the same. Good news will meet those that hope in God's word.

(2.)He enquired what hour the child began to recover (Joh 4:52); not as if he doubted the influence of Christ's word upon the child's recovery, but he was desirous to have his faith confirmed, that he might be able to satisfy any to whom he should mention the miracle; for it was a material circumstance. Note,

[1.]It is good to furnish ourselves with all the corroborating proofs and evidences that may be, to strengthen our faith in the word of Christ, that it may grow up to a full assurance. Show me a token for good.

[2.]The diligent comparison of the works of Christ with his word will be of great use to us for the confirming of our faith. This was the course the nobleman took: He enquired of the servants the hour when he began to amend; and they told him, Yesterday at the seventh hour (at one o'clock in the afternoon, or, as some think this evangelist reckons, at seven o'clock at night) the fever left him; not only he began to amend, but he was perfectly well on a sudden; so the father knew that it was at the same hour when Jesus said to him, Thy son liveth. As the word of God, well-studied, will help us to understand his providences, so the providence of God, well observed, will help us to understand his word; for God is every day fulfilling the scripture. Two things would help to confirm his faith: - First, That the child's recovery was sudden and not gradual. They name the precise time to an hour: Yesterday, not about, but at the seventh hour, the fever left him; not it abated, or began to decrease, but it left him in an instant. The word of Christ did not work like physic, which must have time to operate, and produce the effect, and perhaps cures by expectation only; no, with Christ it was dictum factum - he spoke and it was done; not, He spoke and it was set a doing. Secondly, That it was just at the same time that Christ spoke to him: at that very hour. The synchronisms and coincidents of events add very much to the beauty and harmony of Providence. Observe the time, and the thing itself will be more illustrious, for every thing is beautiful in its time; at the very time when it is promised, as Israel's deliverance (Exo 12:41); at the very time when it is prayed for, as Peter's deliverance, Act 12:12. In men's works, distance of place is the delay of time and the retarding of business; but it is not so in the works of Christ. The pardon, and peace, and comfort, and spiritual healing, which he speaks in heaven, are, if he pleases, at the same time effected and wrought in the souls of believers; and, when these two come to be compared in the great day, Christ will be glorified in his saints, and admired in all them that believe.

8.The happy effect and issue of this. The bringing of the cure to the family brought salvation to it.

(1.)The nobleman himself believed. He had before believed the word of Christ, with reference to this particular occasion; but now he believed in Christ as the Messiah promised, and became one of his disciples. Thus the particular experience of the power and efficacy of one word of Christ may be a happy means to introduce and settle the whole authority of Christ's dominion in the soul. Christ has many ways of gaining the heart, and by the grant of a temporal mercy may make way for better things.

(2.)His whole house believed likewise.

[1.]Because of the interest they all had in the miracle, which preserved the blossom and hopes of the family; this affected them all, and endeared Christ to them, and recommended him to their best thoughts.

[2.]Because of the influence the master of the family had upon them all. A master of a family cannot give faith to those under his charge, nor force them to believe, but he may be instrumental to remove external prejudices, which obstruct the operation of the evidence, and then the work is more than half done. Abraham was famous for this (Gen 18:19), and Joshua, Jos 24:15. This was a nobleman, and probably he had a great household; but, when he comes into Christ's school, he brings them all along with him. What a blessed change was here in this house, occasioned by the sickness of the child! This should reconcile us to afflictions; we know not what good may follow from them. Probably, the conversion of this nobleman and his family at Capernaum might induce Christ to come afterwards, and settle at Capernaum, as his head-quarters in Galilee. When great men receive the gospel, they may be instrumental to bring it to the places where they live.

9.Here is the evangelist's remark upon this cure (Joh 4:54); This is the second miracle, referring to Joh 2:11, where the turning of water into wine is said to be the first; that was soon after his first return out of Judea, this soon after his second. In Judea he had wrought many miracles, Joh 3:2; Joh 4:45. They had the first offer; but, being driven thence, he wrought miracles in Galilee. Somewhere or other Christ will find a welcome. People may, if they please, shut the sun out of their own houses, but they cannot shut it out of the world. This is noted to be the second miracle, 1. To remind us of the first, wrought in the same place some months before. Fresh mercies should revive the remembrance of former mercies, as former mercies should encourage our hopes of further mercies. Christ keeps account of his favours, whether we do or no. 2. To let us know that this cure was before those many cures which the other evangelists mention to be wrought in Galilee, Mat 4:23; Mar 1:34; Luk 4:40. Probably, the patient being a person of quality, the cure was the more talked of and sent him crowds of patients; when this nobleman applied himself to Christ, multitudes followed. What abundance of good may great men do, if they be good men!

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

8 quotes · AD 253–1107
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
30040050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

The country of the prophets, of course, was in Judea, and it is clear that they had had no honor among the Jews since they were stoned, sawn in two, tried and put to death by the sword. Because they were dishonored, they went about in sheepskins and goat skins, being in need, afflicted and ill-treated. … The truth of the Savior’s statement is amazing. It is applicable not only to the holy prophets, who were dishonored by their fellow countrymen, and to our Lord himself, but also to those who have busied themselves in any field of learning and have been despised by their fellow citizens with the result that some of them, too, have been executed.… What has happened in the case of the prophets is most paradoxical indeed. While alive their fellow citizens dishonored them, but dead they respect them by building and adorning their tombs.
And if a presbyter comes from another parish, let him be received to communion by the presbyters; if a deacon, by the deacons; if a bishop, let him sit with the bishop, and be allowed the same honour with himself; and thou, O bishop, shalt desire him to speak to the people words of instruction: for the exhortation and admonition of strangers is very acceptable, and exceeding profitable. For, as the Scripture says, "no prophet is accepted in his own country."
Wherefore is this added? Because He departed not unto Capernaum, but into Galilee, and thence to Cana. For that thou mayest not enquire why He tarried not with His own people, but tarried with the Samaritans, the Evangelist puts the cause, saying that they gave no heed unto Him; on this account He went not thither, that their condemnation might not be the greater. For I suppose that in this place He speaketh of Capernaum as "His country." Now, to show that there He received no honor, hear Him say, "And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell." (Matt. xi. 23.) He calleth it "His own country," because there He set forth the Word of the Dispensation, and more especially dwelt upon it. "What then," saith some one, "do we not see many admired among their kindred?" In the first place such judgments must not be formed from rare instances; and again, if some have been honored in their own, they would have been much more honored in a strange country, for familiarity is wont to make men easily despised.
AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. xxxv. 1) Or consider this the reason that He went, not to Capernaum, but to Galilee and Cana, as appears below, His country being, I think, Capernaum. As He did not obtain honour there, hear what He says; And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shall be brought down to hell. (Mat. 11:23) He calls it His own country, because He had most resided here.

(Hom. xxxv. 2) But do we not see many held in admiration by their own people? We do; but we cannot argue from a few instances. If some are honoured in their own country, many more are honoured out of it, and familiarity generally subjects men to contempt.
What is it, then, brethren, that the Lord doth show us here? Galilee of Judea was then the Lord's own country, because He was brought up in it. But now that the circumstance portends something - for it is not without cause that "prodigies" are so called, but because they portend or presage something: for the word "prodigy" is so termed as if it were porrodicium, quod porro dicat, what betokens something to come, and portends something future - now all those circumstances portended something, predicted something; let us just now assume the country of our Lord Jesus Christ after the flesh (for He had no country on earth, except after the flesh which He took on earth); let us, I say, assume the Lord's own country to mean the people of the Jews. Lo, in His own country He hath no honor. Observe at this moment the multitudes of the Jews; observe that nation now scattered over the whole world, and plucked up by the roots; observe the broken branches, cut off, scattered, withered, which being broken off, the wild olive has deserved to be grafted in; look at the multitude of the Jews: what do they say to us even now? "He whom you worship and adore was our brother." And we reply, "A prophet hath no honor in his own country."

In short, those Jews saw the Lord as He walked on the earth and worked miracles; they saw Him giving sight to the blind, opening the ears of the deaf, loosing the tongues of the dumb, bracing up the limbs of the paralytics, walking on the sea, commanding the winds and waves, raising the dead: they saw Him working such great signs, and after all that scarcely a few believed. I am speaking to God's people; so many of us have believed, what signs have we seen? It is thus, therefore, that what occurred at that time betokened what is now going on. The Jews were, or rather are, like the Galileans; we, like those Samaritans. We have heard the gospel, have given it our consent, have believed on Christ through the gospel; we have seen no signs, none do we demand.
AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tr. xvi) After staying two days in Samaria, He departed into Galilee, where He resided: Now after two days He departed thence, and went into Galilee.

Why then does the Evangelist say immediately, For Jesus Himself testified, that a prophet hath no honour in his own country. For He would seem to have testified more to the truth, had He remained in Samaria, and not gone into Galilee. Not so: He stayed two days in Samaria, and the Samaritans believed on Him: He stayed the same time in Galilee, and the Galileans did not believe on Him, and therefore He said, that a prophet hath no honour in his own country.
Now Jesus, after His stay of two days in Samaria, "departed into Galilee," where He was brought up. And the evangelist, as he goes on, says, "For Jesus Himself testified that a prophet hath no honor in his own country." It was not because He had no honor in Samaria that Jesus departed thence after two days; for Samaria was not His own country, but Galilee. Whilst, therefore, He left Samaria so quickly, and came to Galilee, where He had been brought up, how does He testify that "a prophet hath no honor in his own country"? Rather does it seem that He might have testified that a prophet has no honor in his own country, had He disdained to go into Galilee, and had stayed in Samaria.

Now mark well, beloved, while the Lord suggests and bestows what I may speak, that here is intimated to us no slight mystery. The point that troubles us is, why the evangelist said, "For Jesus Himself testified that a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Urged by this, we go back to the preceding words, to discover the evangelist's intention in saying this; and we find him relating, in the preceding words of the narrative, that after two days Jesus departed from Samaria into Galilee. Was it for this, then, thou saidst, O evangelist, that Jesus testified that a prophet hath no honor in his own country, just because He left Samaria after two days, and made haste to come to Galilee? On the contrary, I should have thought it more likely, that if Jesus had no honor in His own country, He should not have hastened to it, and left Samaria.

Hear then, dearly beloved, what I think in this matter, without prejudice to your own judgment, if you have formed a better. For we have all one Master, and we are fellow-disciples in one school. This, then, is my opinion, and see whether my opinion is not true, or near the truth. In Samaria He spent two days, and the Samaritans believed on Him; many were the days He spent in Galilee, and yet the Galileans did not believe on Him.
AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or thus: Our Lord on leaving Samaria for Galilee, explains why He was not always in Galilee: viz. because of the little honour He received there. A prophet hath no honour in his own country.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 4:44 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8