John 19:21
“The Crucifixion”John 19:17–27
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ἔλεγονelegonWere sayingG3004V-IAI-3PVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Plural
- οὖνounthereforeG3767CONJConjunction
- τῷtō[the]G3588T-DSMDefinite article Dative Singular Masculine
- ΠιλάτῳPilatōto PilateG4091N-DSM-PNoun Dative Singular Masculine Individual
- οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
- ἀρχιερεῖςarchiereischief priestsG749N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- τῶνtōnof theG3588T-GPMDefinite article Genitive Plural Masculine
- Ἰουδαίων·IoudaiōnJewsG2453N-GPM-PGNoun Genitive Plural Masculine Person Gentilic
- μὴmēNotG3361PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- γράφε·graphedo writeG1125V-PAM-2SVerb Present Active Imperative 2nd Singular
- ὁhoTheG3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
- βασιλεὺςbasileusKingG935N-NSM-TNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Title
- τῶνtōnof theG3588T-GPMDefinite article Genitive Plural Masculine
- ἸουδαίωνIoudaiōnJewsG2453N-GPM-PGNoun Genitive Plural Masculine Person Gentilic
- ἀλλ᾽all᾽butG235CONJConjunction
- ὅτιhotiforG3754CONJConjunction
- ἐκεῖνοςekeinosHeG1565D-NSMDemonstrative pronoun Nominative Singular Masculine
- εἶπεν·eipensaidG2036V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- βασιλεύςbasileusKingG935N-NSM-TNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Title
- εἰμιeimiI amG1510V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
- τῶνtōnof theG3588T-GPMDefinite article Genitive Plural Masculine
- ἸουδαίωνIoudaiōnJewsG2453N-GPM-PGNoun Genitive Plural Masculine Person Gentilic
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers John 19:19–30. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Here are some remarkable circumstances of Christ's dying more fully related than before, which those will take special notice of who covet to know Christ and him crucified.
I.The title set up over his head. Observe,
1.The inscription itself which Pilate wrote, and ordered to be fixed to the top of the cross, declaring the cause for which he was crucified, John 19:19. Matthew called it, aitia - the accusation; Mark and Luke called it epigraphē - the inscription; John calls it by the proper Latin name, titlos - the title: and it was this, Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews, Pilate intended this for his reproach, that he, being Jesus of Nazareth, should pretend to be king of the Jews, and set up in competition with Caesar, to whom Pilate would thus recommend himself, as very jealous for his honour and interest, when he would treat but a titular king, a king in metaphor, as the worst of malefactors; but God overruled this matter,
(1.)That it might be a further testimony to the innocency of our Lord Jesus; for here was an accusation which, as it was worded, contained no crime. If this be all they have to lay to his charge, surely he has done nothing worthy of death or of bonds.
(2.)That it might show forth his dignity and honour. This is Jesus a Saviour, Nazōraios, the blessed Nazarite, sanctified to God; this is the king of the Jews, Messiah the prince, the sceptre that should rise out of Israel, as Balaam had foretold; dying for the good of his people, as Caiaphas had foretold. Thus all these three bad men witnessed to Christ, though they meant not so.
2.The notice taken of this inscription (John 19:20): Many of the Jews read it, not only those of Jerusalem, but those out of the country, and from other countries, strangers and proselytes, that came up to worship at the feast. Multitudes read it, and it occasioned a great variety of reflections and speculations, as men stood affected. Christ himself was set for a sign, a title. Here are two reasons why the title was so much read: - (1.) Because the place where Jesus was crucified, though without the gate, was yet nigh the city, which intimates that if it had been any great distance off they would not have been led, no not by their curiosity, to go and see it, and read it. It is an advantage to have the means of knowing Christ brought to our doors. (2.) Because it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin, which made it legible by all; they all understood one or other of these languages, and none were more careful to bring up their children to read than the Jews generally were. It likewise made it the more considerable; everyone would be curious to enquire what it was which was so industriously published in the three most known languages. In the Hebrew the oracles of God were recorded; in Greek the learning of the philosophers; and in Latin the laws of the empire. In each of these Christ is proclaimed king, in whom are hid all the treasures of revelation, wisdom, and power. God so ordering it that this should be written in the three then most known tongues, it was intimated thereby that Jesus Christ should be a Saviour to all nations, and not to the Jews only; and also that every nation should hear in their own tongue the wonderful works of the Redeemer. Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, were the vulgar languages at that time in this part of the world; so that this is so far from intimating (as the Papists would have it) that the scripture is still to be retained in these three languages, that on the contrary it teaches us that the knowledge of Christ ought to be diffused throughout every nation in their own tongue, as the proper vehicle of it, that people may converse as freely with the scriptures as they do with their neighbours.
3.The offence which the prosecutors took at it, John 19:21. They would not have it written, the king of the Jews; but that he said of himself, I am the king of the Jews. Here they show themselves,
(1.)Very spiteful and malicious against Christ. It was not enough to have him crucified, but they must have his name crucified too. To justify themselves in giving him such bad treatment, they thought themselves concerned to give him a bad character, and to represent him as a usurper of honours and powers that he was not entitled to.
(2.)Foolishly jealous of the honour of their nation. Though they were a conquered and enslaved people, yet they stood so much upon the punctilio of their reputation that they scorned to have it said that this was their king.
(3.)Very impertinent and troublesome to Pilate. They could not but be sensible that they had forced him, against his mind, to condemn Christ, and yet, in such a trivial thing as this, they continue to tease him; and it was so much the worse in that, though they had charged him with pretending to be the king of the Jews, yet they had not proved it, nor had he ever said so.
4.The judge's resolution to adhere to it: "What I have written I have written, and will not alter it to humour them."
(1.)Hereby an affront was put upon the chief priests, who would still be dictating. It seems, by Pilate's manner of speaking, that he was uneasy in himself for yielding to them, and vexed at them for forcing him to it, and therefore he was resolved to be cross with them; and by this inscription he insinuates,
[1.]That, notwithstanding their pretences, they were not sincere in their affections to Caesar and his government; they were willing enough to have a king of the Jews, if they could have one to their mind.
[2.]That such a king as this, so mean and despicable, was good enough to be the king of the Jews; and this would be the fate of all that should dare to oppose the Roman power.
[3.]That they had been very unjust and unreasonable in prosecuting this Jesus, when there was no fault to be found in him.
(2.)Hereby honour was done to the Lord Jesus. Pilate stuck to it with resolution, that he was the king of the Jews. What he had written was what God had first written, and therefore he could not alter it; for thus it was written, that Messiah the prince should be cut off, Daniel 9:26. This therefore is the true cause of his death; he dies because the king of Israel must die, must thus die. When the Jews reject Christ, and will not have him for their king, Pilate, a Gentile, sticks to it that he is a king, which was an earnest of what came to pass soon after, when the Gentiles submitted to the kingdom of the Messiah, which the unbelieving Jews had rebelled against.
II.The dividing of his garments among the executioners, John 19:23, John 19:24.
Four soldiers were employed, who, when they had crucified Jesus, had nailed him to the cross, and lifted it up, and him upon it, and nothing more was to be done than to wait his expiring through the extremity of pain, as, with us, when the prisoner is turned off, then they went to make a dividend of his clothes, each claiming an equal share, and so they made four parts, as nearly of the same value as they could, to every soldier a part; but his coat, or upper garment whether cloak or gown, being a pretty piece of curiosity, without seam, woven from the top throughout, they agreed to cast lots for it. Here observe,
1.The shame they put upon our Lord Jesus, in stripping him of his garments before they crucified him. The shame of nakedness came in with sin. He therefore who was made sin for us bore that shame, to roll away our reproach. He was stripped, that we might be clothed with white raiment (Revelation 3:18), and that when we are unclothed we may not be found naked.
2.The wages with which these soldiers paid themselves for crucifying Christ. They were willing to do it for his old clothes. Nothing is to be done so bad, but there will be found men bad enough to do it for a trifle. Probably they hoped to make more than ordinary advantage of his clothes, having heard of cures wrought by the touch of the hem of his garment, or expecting that his admirers would give any money for them.
3.The sport they made about his seamless coat. We read not of any thing about him valuable or remarkable but this, and this not for the richness, but only the variety of it, for it was woven from the top throughout; there was no curiosity therefore in the shape, but a designed plainness. Tradition says, his mother wove it for him, and adds this further, that it was made for him when he was a child, and, like the Israelites' clothes in the wilderness, waxed not old; but this is a groundless fancy. The soldiers thought it a pity to rend it, for then it would unravel, and a piece of it would be good for nothing; they would therefore cast lots for it. While Christ was in his dying agonies, they were merrily dividing his spoils. The preserving of Christ's seamless coat is commonly alluded to to show the care all Christians ought to take that they rend not the church of Christ with strifes and divisions; yet some have observed that the reason why the soldiers would not rend Christ's coat was not out of any respect to Christ, but because each of them hoped to have it entire for himself. And so many cry out against schism, only that they may engross all the wealth and power to themselves. Those who opposed Luther's separation from the church of Rome urged much the tunica inconsutilis - the seamless coat; and some of them laid so much stress upon it that they were called the Inconsutilistae - The seamless.
4.The fulfilling of the scripture in this. David, in spirit, foretold this very circumstance of Christ's sufferings, in that passage, Psalm 22:18. The event so exactly answering the prediction proves,
(1.)That the scripture is the word of God, which foretold contingent events concerning Christ so long before, and they came to pass according to the prediction.
(2.)That Jesus is the true Messiah; for in him all the Old Testament prophecies concerning the Messiah had, and have, their full accomplishment. These things therefore the soldiers did.
III.The care that he took of his poor mother.
1.His mother attends him to his death (John 19:25): There stood by the cross, as near as they could get, his mother, and some of his relations and friends with her. At first, they stood near, as it is said here; but afterwards, it is probable, the soldiers forced them to stand afar off, as it is said in Matthew and Mark: or they themselves removed out of the ground.
(1.)See here the tender affection of these pious women to our Lord Jesus in his sufferings. When all his disciples, except John, has forsaken him, they continued their attendance on him. Thus the feeble were as David (Zechariah 12:8): they were not deterred by the fury of the enemy nor the horror of the sight; they could not rescue him nor relieve him, yet they attended him, to show their good-will. It is an impious and blasphemous construction which some of the popish writers put upon the virgin Mary standing by the cross, that thereby she contributed to the satisfaction he made for sin no less than he did, and so became a joint-mediatrix and co-adjutrix in our salvation.
(2.)We may easily suppose what an affliction it was to these poor women to see him thus abused, especially to the blessed virgin. Now was fulfilled Simeon's word, A sword shall pierce through thy own soul, Luke 2:35. His torments were her tortures; she was upon the rack, while he was upon the cross; and her heart bled with his wounds; and the reproaches wherewith they reproached him fell on those that attended him.
(3.)We may justly admire the power of divine grace in supporting these women, especially the virgin Mary, under this heavy trial. We do not find his mother wringing her hands, or tearing her hair, or rending her clothes, or making an outcry; but, with a wonderful composure, standing by the cross, and her friends with her. Surely she and they were strengthened by a divine power to this degree of patience; and surely the virgin Mary had a fuller expectation of his resurrection than the rest had, which supported her thus. We know not what we can bear till we are tried, and then we know who has said, My grace is sufficient for thee.
2.He tenderly provides for his mother at his death. It is probable that Joseph, her husband, was long since dead, and that her son Jesus had supported her, and her relation to him had been her maintenance; and now that he was dying what would become of her? He saw her standing by, and knew her cares and griefs; and he saw John standing not far off, and so he settled a new relation between his beloved mother and his beloved disciple; for he said to her, "Woman, behold thy son, for whom henceforward thou must have a motherly affection;" and to him, "Behold thy mother, to whom thou must pay a filial duty." And so from that hour, that hour never to be forgotten, that disciple took her to his own home. See here,
(1.)The care Christ took of his dear mother. He was not so much taken up with a sense of his sufferings as to forget his friends, all whose concerns he bore upon his heart. His mother, perhaps, was so taken up with his sufferings that she thought not of what would become of her; but he admitted that thought. Silver and gold he had none to leave, no estate, real or personal; his clothes the soldiers had seized, and we hear no more of the bag since Judas, who had carried it, hanged himself. He had therefore no other way to provide for his mother than by his interest in a friend, which he does here.
[1.]He calls her woman, not mother, not out of any disrespect to her, but because mother would have been a cutting word to her that was already wounded to the heart with grief; like Isaac saying to Abraham, My father. He speaks as one that was now no more in this world, but was already dead to those in it that were dearest to him. His speaking in this seemingly slight manner to his mother, as he had done formerly, was designed to obviate and give a check to the undue honours which he foresaw would be given to her in the Romish church, as if she were a joint purchaser with him in the honours of the Redeemer.
[2.]He directs her to look upon John as her son: "Behold him as thy son, who stands there by thee, and be as a mother to him." See here, First, An instance of divine goodness, to be observed for our encouragement. Sometimes, when God removes one comfort from us, he raises up another for us, perhaps where we looked not for it. We read of children which the church shall have after she has lost the other, Isaiah 49:21. Let none therefore reckon all gone with one cistern dried up, for from the same fountain another may be filled. Secondly, An instance of filial duty, to be observed for our imitation. Christ has here taught children to provide, to the utmost of their power, for the comfort of their aged parents. When David was in distress, he took care of his parents, and found out a shelter for them (1 Samuel 22:3); so the Son of David here. Children at their death, according to their ability, should provide for their parents, if they survive them, and need their kindness.
(2.)The confidence he reposed in the beloved disciple. It is to him he says, Behold thy mother, that is, I recommend her to thy care, be thou as a son to her to guide her (Isaiah 51:18); and forsake her not when she is old, Proverbs 23:22. Now,
[1.]This was an honour put upon John, and a testimony both to his prudence and to his fidelity. If he who knows all things had not known that John loved him, he would not have made him his mother's guardian. It is a great honour to be employed for Christ, and to be entrusted with any of his interest in the world. But,
[2.]It would be a care and some charge to John; but he cheerfully accepted it, and took her to his own home, not objecting the trouble nor expense, nor his obligations to his own family, nor the ill-will he might contract by it. Note, Those that truly love Christ, and are beloved of him, will be glad of an opportunity to do any service to him or his. Nicephoras's Eccl. Hist. lib. 2 cap. 3, saith that the virgin Mary lived with John at Jerusalem eleven years, and then died. Others, that she lived to remove with him to Ephesus.
IV.The fulfilling of the scripture, in the giving of him vinegar to drink, John 19:28, John 19:29. Observe,
1.How much respect Christ showed to the scripture (John 19:28): Knowing that all things hitherto were accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, which spoke of his drinking in his sufferings, he saith, I thirst, that is, he called for drink.
(1.)It was not at all strange that he was thirsty; we find him thirsty in a journey (John 4:6, John 4:7), and now thirsty when he was just at his journey's end. Well might he thirst after all the toil and hurry which he had undergone, and being now in the agonies of death, ready to expire purely by the loss of blood and extremity of pain. The torments of hell are represented by a violent thirst in the complaint of the rich man that begged for a drop of water to cool his tongue. To that everlasting thirst we had been condemned, had not Christ suffered for us.
(2.)But the reason of his complaining of it is somewhat surprising; it is the only word he spoke that looked like complaint of his outward sufferings. When they scourged him, and crowned him with thorns, he did not cry, O my head! or, My back! But now he cried, I thirst. For,
[1.]He would thus express the travail of his soul, Isaiah 53:11. He thirsted after the glorifying of God, and the accomplishment of the work of our redemption, and the happy issue of his undertaking.
[2.]He would thus take care to see the scripture fulfilled. Hitherto, all had been accomplished, and he knew it, for this was the thing he had carefully observed all along; and now he called to mind one thing more, which this was the proper season for the performance of. By this it appears that he was the Messiah, in that not only the scripture was punctually fulfilled in him, but it was strictly eyed by him. By this it appears that God was with him of a truth - that in all he did he went exactly according to the word of God, taking care not to destroy, but to fulfil, the law and the prophets. Now, First, The scripture had foretold his thirst, and therefore he himself related it, because it could not otherwise be known, saying, I thirst; it was foretold that his tongue should cleave to his jaws, Psalm 22:15. Samson, an eminent type of Christ, when he was laying the Philistines heaps upon heaps, was himself sore athirst (Judges 15:18); so was Christ, when he was upon the cross, spoiling principalities and powers. Secondly, The scripture had foretold that in his thirst he should have vinegar given him to drink, Psalm 69:21. They had given him vinegar to drink before they crucified him (Matthew 27:34), but the prophecy was not exactly fulfilled in that, because that was not in his thirst; therefore now he said, I thirst, and called for it again: then he would not drink, but now he received it Christ would rather court an affront than see any prophecy unfulfilled. This should satisfy us under all our trials, that the will of God is done, and the word of God accomplished.
2.See how little respect his persecutors showed to him (John 19:29): There was set a vessel full of vinegar, probably according to the custom at all executions of this nature; or, as others think, it was now set designedly for an abuse to Christ, instead of the cup of wine which they used to give to those that were ready to perish; with this they filled a sponge, for they would not allow him a cup, and they put it upon hyssop, a hyssop-stalk, and with this heaved it to his mouth; hussōpō perithentes - they stuck it round with hyssop; so it may be taken; or, as others, they mingled it with hyssop-water, and this they gave him to drink when he was thirsty; a drop of water would have cooled his tongue better than a draught of vinegar: yet this he submitted to for us. We had taken the sour grapes, and thus his teeth were set on edge; we had forfeited all comforts and refreshments, and therefore they were withheld from him. When heaven denied him a beam of light earth denied him a drop of water, and put vinegar in the room of it.
V.The dying word wherewith he breathed out his soul (John 19:30):
When he had received the vinegar, as much of it as he thought fit, he said, It is finished; and, with that, bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. Observe,
1.What he said, and we may suppose him to say it with triumph and exultation, Tetelestai - It is finished, a comprehensive word, and a comfortable one. (1.) It is finished, that is, the malice and enmity of his persecutors had now done their worst; when he had received that last indignity in the vinegar they gave him, he said, "This is the last; I am now going out of their reach, where the wicked cease from troubling." (2.) It is finished, that is, the counsel and commandment of his Father concerning his sufferings were now fulfilled; it was a determinate counsel, and he took care to see every iota and tittle of it exactly answered, Acts 2:23. He had said, when he entered upon his sufferings, Father, thy will be done; and now he saith with pleasure, It is done. It was his meat and drink to finish his work (John 4:34), and the meat and drink refreshed him, when they gave him gall and vinegar. (3.) It is finished, that is, all the types and prophecies of the Old Testament, which pointed at the sufferings of the Messiah, were accomplished and answered. He speaks as if, now that they had given him the vinegar, he could not bethink himself of any word in the Old Testament that was to be fulfilled between him and his death but it had its accomplishment; such as, his being sold for thirty pieces of silver, his hands and feet being pierced, his garments divided, etc.; and now that this is done. It is finished. (4.) It is finished, that is, the ceremonial law is abolished, and a period put to the obligation of it. The substance is now come, and all the shadows are done away. Just now the veil is rent, the wall of partition is taken down, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances, Ephesians 2:14, Ephesians 2:15. The Mosaic economy is dissolved, to make way for a better hope. (5.) It is finished, that is, sin is finished, and an end made of transgression, by the bringing in of an everlasting righteousness. It seems to refer to Daniel 9:24. The Lamb of God was sacrificed to take away the sin of the world, and it is done, Hebrews 9:26. (6.) It is finished, that is, his sufferings were now finished, both those of his soul and those of his body. The storm is over, the worst is past; all his pains and agonies are at an end, and he is just going to paradise, entering upon the joy set before him. Let all that suffer for Christ, and with Christ, comfort themselves with this, that yet a little while and they also shall say, It is finished. (7.) It is finished, that is, his life was now finished, he was just ready to breathe his last, and now he is no more in this world, John 17:11. This is like that of blessed Paul (2 Timothy 4:7), I have finished my course, my race is run, my glass is out, mene, mene - numbered and finished. This we must all come to shortly. (8.) It is finished, that is, the work of man's redemption and salvation is now completed, at least the hardest part of the undertaking is over; a full satisfaction is made to the justice of God, a fatal blow given to the power of Satan, a fountain of grace opened that shall ever flow, a foundation of peace and happiness laid that shall never fail. Christ had now gone through with his work, and finished it, John 17:4. For, as for God, his work is perfect; when I begin, saith he, I will also make an end. And, as in the purchase, so in the application of the redemption, he that has begun a good work will perform it; the mystery of God shall be finished.
2.What he did: He bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. He was voluntary in dying; for he was not only the sacrifice, but the priest and the offerer; and the animus offerentis - the mind of the offerer, was all in all in the sacrifice. Christ showed his will in his sufferings, by which will we are sanctified.
(1.)He gave up the ghost. His life was not forcibly extorted from him, but freely resigned. He had said, Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit, thereby expressing the intention of this act. I give up myself as a ransom for many; and, accordingly, he did give up his spirit, paid down the price of pardon and life at his Father's hands. Father, glorify thy name.
(2.)He bowed his head. Those that were crucified, in dying stretched up their heads to gasp for breath, and did not drop their heads till they had breathed their last; but Christ, to show himself active in dying, bowed his head first, composing himself, as it were, to fall asleep. God had laid upon him the iniquity of us all, putting it upon the head of this great sacrifice; and some think that by this bowing of his head he would intimate his sense of the weight upon him. See Psalm 38:4; Psalm 40:12. The bowing of his head shows his submission to his Father's will, and his obedience to death. He accommodated himself to his dying work, as Jacob, who gathered up his feet into the bed, and then yielded up the ghost.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
7 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
"And Pilate wrote a title." At the same time requiting the Jews, and making a defense for Christ. For since, they had given Him up as worthless, and attempted to confirm this sentence by making Him share the punishment of the robbers, in order that for the future it might be in no man's power to prefer evil charges against him, or to accuse him as a worthless and wicked person, to close moreover their mouths and the mouths of all who might desire to accuse Him, and to show that they had risen up against their own King, Pilate thus placed, as on a trophy, those letters, which utter a clear voice, and show forth His Victory, and proclaim His Kingdom, though not in its completeness. And this he made manifest not in a single tongue, but in three languages; for since it was likely that there would be a mixed multitude among the Jews on account of the Feast, in order that none might be ignorant of the defense, he publicly recorded the madness of the Jews, in all the languages. For they bore malice against Him even when crucified. "Yet what did this harm you? Nothing. For if He was a mortal and weak, and was about to become extinct, why did ye fear the letters asserting that He is the King of the Jews?" And what do they ask? "Say that 'he said.' For now it is an assertion, and a general sentence, but if 'he said' be added, the charge is shown to be one arising from his own rashness and arrogance." Still Pilate was not turned aside, but stood to his first decision. And it is no little thing that is dispensed even from this circumstance, but the whole matter. For since the wood of the cross was buried, because no one was careful to take it up, inasmuch as fear was pressing, and the believers were hurrying to other urgent matters; and since it was in after times to be sought for, and it was likely that the three crosses would lie together, in order that the Lord's might not be unknown, it was made manifest to all, first by its lying in the middle, and then by the title. For those of the thieves had no titles.
For after having done what they would, they endeavor also to injure His honor, fearing His resurrection. Therefore they say these things publicly, and crucified thieves with Him, and wishing to prove Him a deceiver, they say, "Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days come down from the cross." For since on telling Pilate to remove the accusation (this was the writing, "The king of the Jews"), they prevailed not, but he persevered in saying, "What I have written, I have written," they then endeavor by their derision of Him to show that He is not a king.
As letters are inscribed on a trophy declaring the victory, so Pilate wrote a title on Christ's cross. And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross: thus at once distinguishing Christ from the thieves with Him, and exposing the malice of the Jews in rising up against their King: And the writing was, Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.
It is probable that many Gentiles as well as Jews bad come up to the feast. So the title was written in three languages, that all might read it: And it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.
But the Jews grudged our Lord this title: Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that He said, I am King of the Jews, For as Pilate wrote it, it was a plain and single declaration that He was King, but the addition of, that he said, made it a charge against Him of petulance and vain glory. But Pilate was firm: Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.
The leaders of the Jews urged Pilate not to write without qualification that he is the king of the Jews, but that he himself said he was the king of the Jews, to which he replied, “What I have written, I have written.” This had Pilate representing the wild olive to be grafted on, while the leaders of the Jews represented the broken-off branches. He was, you see, a man of the nations, writing for the nations their confession of faith, convicting the Jews of their denial of it, so that the Lord himself rightly said to them, “The kingdom shall be taken away from you and given to a nation that does justice.” … Pilate, certainly, wrote “king of the Jews,” not “king of the Greeks or the Latins,” although Jesus was going to reign over the nations. And what he has written, he has written, and he did not change it at the urging of unbelievers, as had been foretold such a long time before in the psalm, “Do not corrupt the inscription of the title.” All the nations believe in the king of the Jews. He reigns over all the nations but reigns nonetheless as the king of the Jews. Such was the worth and potency of that root that it could change the engrafted wild olive into itself, while the wild olive could not eliminate the name of the olive.
"Then said the chief priests of the Jews unto Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews. Pilate answered, What I have written I have written." Oh the ineffable power of the working of God, even in the hearts of the ignorant! Was there not some hidden voice that sounded through Pilate's inner man with a kind, if one may so say, of loud-toned silence, the words that had been prophesied so long before in the very letter of the Psalms, "Corrupt not the inscription of the title"? Here, then, you see, he corrupted it not; what he has written he has written. But the high priests, who wished it to be corrupted, what did they say? "Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews." What is it, madmen, that you say? Why do you oppose the doing of that which you are utterly unable to alter? Will it by any such means become the less true that Jesus said, "I am King of the Jews"? If that cannot be tampered with which Pilate has written, can that be tampered with which the truth has uttered?
(Tract. cxviii) But was Christ the King of the Jews only? or of the Gentiles too? Of the Gentiles too, as we read in the Psalms, Yet have I set My King upon My holy hill of Sion; (Ps. 2:6) after which it follows, Demand of Me, and I will give Thee the heathen for Thine inheritance. So this title expresses a great mystery, viz. that the wild olive-tree was made partaker of the fatness of the olive-tree, not the olive-tree made partaker of the bitterness of the wild olive-tree. Christ then is King of the Jews according to the circumcision not of the flesh, but of the heart; not in the letter, but in the spirit. This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city.
(Tract. cxviii) These three were the languages most known there: the Hebrew, on account of being used in the worship of the Jews: the Greek, in consequence of the spread of Greek philosophy: the Latin, from the Roman empire being established every where.
O ineffable working of Divine power even in the hearts of ignorant men! Did not some hidden voice sound from within, and, if we may say so, with clamorous silence, saying to Pilate in the prophetic words of the Psalm, Alter not the inscription of the titlea? But what say ye, ye mad priests: will the title be the less true, because Jesus said, I am the King of the Jews? If that which Pilate wrote cannot be altered, can that be altered which the Truth spoke? Pilate wrote what he wrote, bceause our Lord said what He said.
The rulers of the Jews took ill the writing on the title, and, full of bitter hatred, once more denied the Kingship of Christ, and said in their great folly that He had never reigned in fact, nor been accepted as King, but had merely used this expression: not knowing that to lie is contrary to the nature of truth, and Christ is Truth. He was, then, King of the Jews, if He was proved to have given Himself this title, as they themselves also confirmed by their own words. And Pilate rejected their request that he should alter the inscription, not consenting in all things to do despite unto the glory of our Saviour, doubtless owing to God's Ineffable Will. For the Kingship of Christ was firmly rooted, and beyond the reach of calumny, though the Jews might not consent thereunto, and might strive to deface the confession of His glory.
Continue studying John 19:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The chief priests ask Pilate to turn the title into a claim, ‘he said, I am King of the Jews,’ because they reject Jesus as their king.
“Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate,”
The men who had pressed for his death now quarrel over the words above his head.
“Write not, The King of the Jews;”
They object to a title that states his kingship as fact.
“but that he said, I am King of the Jews.”
Adding “he said” would make it a claim, a pretender’s boast.
Passage studyJohn 19:17–27
The King Crucified at Golgotha
Summary
Jesus goes out of Jerusalem carrying his own cross and is crucified at Golgotha between two other men. Pilate fixes a title to the cross in Hebrew, Greek and Latin, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS, and when the chief priests ask him to change it he answers, “What I have written I have written.” At the foot of the cross the soldiers share out his clothes and cast lots for his seamless coat, just as Psalm 22 had said. Close by stand the women who loved him, and from the cross Jesus gives his mother and the disciple whom he loved to each other as mother and son. In these eleven verses the man dying in shame is named King by his own judge, fulfils the Scriptures down to the smallest detail, and cares for his own to the end.
Jesus carries his cross to Golgotha
Pilate has just delivered Jesus to be crucified (John 19:16), and John takes us straight onto the road. “And he bearing his cross went forth.” The verb bastázō means to lift or carry, and it is also used of enduring something. The cross, staurós, was first an upright stake or pole, and by this time it was the instrument the Romans used to put criminals to death. A condemned man normally carried the crossbeam, the patibulum, from the place of judgment to the place of execution, often through crowded streets, so the walk was itself part of the punishment and the shame.
John tells us that Jesus carried his own cross, and that fits the way his Gospel tells the whole passion. Jesus goes to his death as the one who lays down his life of himself (John 10:18), who knows that his hour has come (John 13:1), and who calls that hour the time when the Son of man is glorified (John 12:23). The road he begins here ends with his cry from the cross, “It is finished” (John 19:30). He humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross (Philippians 2:8).
Isaiah saw the Servant of the LORD led as a lamb to the slaughter, with the iniquity of us all laid on him (Isaiah 53:3–7). Peter says that Jesus himself bore our sins in his own body on the tree (1 Peter 2:24), and Hebrews that Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many (Hebrews 9:28). The wood on his shoulders was the place where he would bear that far heavier load, for the world that God so loved (John 3:16).
Did Jesus carry the cross, or did Simon of Cyrene?
Both accounts are true, and they fit together well. Matthew, Mark and Luke tell how the soldiers compelled Simon of Cyrene to bear the cross (Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21, Luke 23:26), and John tells how Jesus set out bearing it himself. Jesus, already scourged, may well have carried it for the first part of the way until his strength failed, and then Simon was pressed into service. John’s account keeps before us the Lord who took up his cross willingly, the Son fulfilling his Father’s will.
The place of a skull
“Went forth” translates exérchomai, to go out, and Jesus goes out of the city. Israel’s law had the condemned taken outside the camp, as the LORD commanded for the blasphemer (Leviticus 24:14), and executions in Jerusalem took place outside the walls so that the city would stay undefiled. Hebrews says that Jesus “suffered without the gate” (Hebrews 13:12). Verse 20 adds that the place was close to the city, where crowds passed by.
The place (tópos) was called kraníon, a skull, the word behind our “cranium”, and through the Latin it has given us the name Calvary. “In the Hebrew” translates Hebraïstí, the language of the Jews of Judea, which at that time was Aramaic, and in that language the place was Golgothâ, which also means skull. The name may come from the shape of the hill or from its use as a place of death, and Scripture leaves the reason unstated. Either way it was a name of death, and Christ went there to conquer death.
Crucified between two others
“Where they crucified him.” Hópou, “where”, points back to Golgotha, and stauróō, the verb formed from the word for cross, means to crucify. John names the act in a single word, and his first readers knew what it meant. Crucifixion was the most brutal and public death Rome had, designed to inflict the greatest pain and humiliation and to warn others, and it was kept for slaves, rebels and the worst of criminals.
“And two other with him, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst.” Állos, “other”, simply counts two more men, and the other Gospels tell us they were robbers and criminals (Matthew 27:38, Luke 23:33). “On either side one” renders enteûthen written twice, “from here and from here”, one on the right and one on the left. The small word dé joins on the last clause, and mésos means the middle, the place among the others. The Romans often crucified several men at once, especially at feasts such as Passover, and placing a man who was called a king between two criminals was meant to strip him of every shred of dignity.
Why was Jesus crucified between two criminals?
God placed his Son there to fulfil what he had said through Isaiah, that his Servant “was numbered with the transgressors” (Isaiah 53:12). His enemies meant the arrangement as one more insult, and God used it to show what his Son had come to do. Jesus, who knew no sin, was counted among sinners because he was taking their place, for God made him to be sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21).
The word mésos means simply the middle, and yet the sight is worth pausing over. The one who hangs between two condemned men is the one mediator between God and men (1 Timothy 2:5). Through the blood of his cross God makes peace and reconciles all things to himself (Colossians 1:20), and Jesus had said that when he was lifted up he would draw all men unto him (John 12:32). Even at the lowest point of his humiliation, he is the one on whom everything turns.
Pilate’s title, the King of the Jews
“And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross.” The verb is gráphō, to write, and títlos comes from the Latin titulus, a placard. It was Roman practice to fix such a notice to the cross, usually above the condemned man’s head, giving his name and the crime he died for, both as a legal record and as a warning to others. Pilate, the Roman prefect of Judea, held the highest judicial and military power in the province, so the wording was his own choice. The same title is recorded in the other Gospels (Matthew 27:37, Mark 15:26, Luke 23:38), and the verses that follow tell how widely it was read and how fiercely it was resisted (John 19:20–22).
“JESUS OF NAZARETH” gives the man’s name and home town, the usual way of telling one person from another. “THE KING OF THE JEWS” gives the charge, a claim to kingship that Rome treated as rebellion against Caesar. Basileús means king, one with authority to rule, and Ioudaîos means a Judaean, one belonging to Judah, a name that goes back to Judah the son of Jacob. Kingship has run through the whole of Jesus’ trial. Pilate asked him whether he was the King of the Jews, and Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:33–38). Early in this Gospel Nathanael confessed him as the King of Israel (John 1:49), and at his birth the wise men came looking for the one born King of the Jews (Matthew 2:2).
Pilate probably meant the title as a plain statement of the charge, and perhaps also as a sneer at the leaders who had forced his hand. God meant it as the truth. The cross, the instrument of Jesus’ shame, became the place where his kingship was written up for all to see, and the judge who condemned him became the herald who proclaimed him. After the cross God highly exalted him and gave him a name above every name, that every knee should bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord (Philippians 2:9–11). By his blood he redeemed a people “out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation” (Revelation 5:9), and his name is written “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Revelation 19:16).
Why was the title written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin?
The three languages meant that everyone in Jerusalem could read who Jesus was. “This title then read many of the Jews.” Anaginṓskō means to read, from a word for knowing again, that is, recognizing written letters. “Many” is polýs, and “then” is oûn, which carries the story on from Pilate’s act. John gives the reason with “for” (hóti, because): the place where Jesus was crucified was near (engýs) the city, so the crowds going in and out passed close by. And “it was written” (ēn with gráphō) in three languages. Hebraïstí, the same word as in verse 17, means the Aramaic spoken by the Jews of Judea. Hellēnistí is Greek, the common language of the eastern Roman Empire, and Rhōmaïstí is Latin, the official language of Roman government.
At Passover Jerusalem was crowded with Jews of the land, Greek-speaking Jews from abroad, Roman officials and Gentile travellers, and the title spoke to every one of them. The three languages also make a fitting picture. Hebrew was the tongue of Israel’s faith, Greek of learning and culture, and Latin of Roman power, and over the cross the King was proclaimed in all three.
The Scriptures had long looked to this reach. The LORD called, “Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth” (Isaiah 45:22). The psalm of the cross foresees all the ends of the world remembering and turning unto the LORD (Psalm 22:27), and John later saw a great multitude of all nations, kindreds, people and tongues before the throne (Revelation 7:9). What Pilate posted beside a road outside Jerusalem, the risen Lord sent his disciples to preach in all the world (Mark 16:15).
Why did the chief priests object?
The chief priests wanted the title to report a claim, “he said, I am King of the Jews,” so that it would name Jesus as a pretender. “Write not, The King of the Jews” uses the same verb, gráphō, and they ask Pilate to undo his writing. Their version adds “he said” and puts the kingship in Jesus’ own mouth with eimí, the ordinary verb “to be”. The change would turn a statement into a report, and Jesus’ kingship into one man’s boast.
They had several reasons. They had rejected his claim and condemned him, and the title as written affirmed what they denied. They feared Rome, since a king of the Jews named by a Roman governor could look like a sign of rebellion and bring harsher rule on the nation and on their own authority. And it shamed them publicly, declaring over the head of the man they had handed over that he was their king. Men who knew the Scriptures well were blind to their King as he hung before them, though God had long ago said, “Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion” (Psalm 2:6). Jesus Christ is the prince of the kings of the earth (Revelation 1:5), whatever any council writes about him.
What I have written I have written
Pilate’s answer settles the matter. “Answered” is apokrínomai, the ordinary word for a reply, and “what” is hós, the relative pronoun. In Greek the reply is ho gegrapha gegrapha, the verb gráphō in a tense used for a finished act whose result stands. The words “I have written” come twice in his reply, and the repetition closes the door on any further request.
John leaves Pilate’s reasons unstated, though the trial shows us some of them. Pilate had tried to release Jesus and was pressed into condemning him by the charge that letting him go would be disloyalty to Caesar (John 19:12–16). He may have been weary of the leaders’ demands, eager to assert his authority after giving way, or glad of a chance to show his contempt for those who had forced his hand. Pilate governed Judea from A.D. 26 to 36, and on this one point he stood firm.
Did Pilate believe Jesus was the King?
Pilate wrote the charge as he understood it, and the Gospels record no faith in Jesus on his part. He had questioned Jesus about his kingdom, heard that it was of another world, and declared, “I find no fault in him” (John 19:4). He saw Jesus as innocent of rebellion, and his title was either the charge as he saw it or a jab at the leaders.
Yet his stubbornness served God’s purpose. “The king’s heart is in the hand of the LORD” (Proverbs 21:1). Men make many plans, and the counsel of the LORD stands (Proverbs 19:21, Psalm 33:11), for God declares the end from the beginning and does all his pleasure (Isaiah 46:10). His word stands for ever (Isaiah 40:8) and is settled in heaven (Psalm 119:89). Pilate’s title stood against the priests’ protest, and far more surely God’s decree concerning his Son stands. Exalted to the right hand of God (Acts 2:33), the crucified King of the Jews says, “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18).
The soldiers divide his clothes
“Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments.” Executioners were entitled to the clothes of the men they put to death, and a crucifixion squad was usually four soldiers, which is why the garments were made into four parts, “to every soldier a part”. “Garments” is himátion, clothing, here the outer garments that could easily be shared out, which may have included his cloak, sandals and head covering. The men at work beneath the cross treated the dying Jesus as so much spoil.
“And also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout.” The coat is the chitṓn, the tunic worn next to the body. Árrhaphos, “without seam”, means unsewn, made in a single piece, and ánōthen, “from the top”, means from above, here of a garment woven downward from its upper edge in one continuous piece. Common tunics were sewn together from pieces, so a seamless one took more labour and was worth more. The man who had lived so humbly went to the cross wearing a garment of real worth.
Casting lots, and the Scripture fulfilled
“Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be.” Torn into four, the coat would be worth little, so the soldiers drew lots for it, a common way of settling who got what, much like throwing dice. Their minds were on its value, and they gambled at the foot of the cross where the Son of God was dying.
John then tells us why it happened so: “that the scripture might be fulfilled.” Graphḗ in the singular usually means one particular passage, and here it is Psalm 22:18: “They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots.” Diamerízō, “parted”, means to divide up and distribute, and “raiment” is himátion, the same word as “garments” in verse 23. “Vesture” is himatismós, clothing. The psalm sets two lines side by side, and John shows the soldiers doing both. They shared out his garments, and for his coat they cast lots. “These things therefore the soldiers did,” he adds, setting the deed plainly beside the prophecy.
Psalm 22 is the cry of a suffering man to God, and here its words come true at the hands of men wholly unaware of it. Matthew records the same scene (Matthew 27:35). After his resurrection Jesus told his disciples that all things written of him in the law, the prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled (Luke 24:44), and Peter preached that God had fulfilled what he showed by all his prophets, that Christ should suffer (Acts 3:18). God’s hand reached even to a soldier’s throw of the lots. The death of his Son was the appointed centre of his plan, and the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world (John 1:29), bore even this indignity for us.
Does the seamless coat carry a meaning?
John tells us the coat was seamless so that we understand why the soldiers kept it whole and cast lots, and he draws out no further meaning himself. Some believers see in it an echo of the high priest’s robe (Exodus 28:31–32), pointing to Jesus as our great High Priest (Hebrews 4:14–16). Others see the oneness of his single offering, complete and sufficient for all time (Hebrews 10:10–14), or the unity of his body, the church, with “one Lord, one faith, one baptism” (Ephesians 4:4–6). Each of these is true of Christ, and the coat makes a fitting picture of them, while John’s own point is the fulfilled psalm.
The women who stood by the cross
“Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother.” Hístēmi is the ordinary verb to stand, and here it pictures the women staying close by. The cross is the same staurós that Jesus carried in verse 17 and on which Pilate fixed the title in verse 19. Most of the disciples had fled, and these women stayed, with the one disciple John is about to name, near a public execution where the friends of a condemned man ran a real risk. Their presence was costly, an act of love and courage in the face of grief and shame.
Mḗtēr, mother, stands first. Mary watched her son die in agony, and the word of Simeon came true, that a sword would pierce through her own soul (Luke 2:35). Mary Magdalene had followed Jesus with other women who ministered to him of their substance (Luke 8:2–3), and she would be at the tomb early on the first day of the week (John 20:1) and the first to meet the risen Lord (John 20:16). The women who supported him in his ministry stood by him at his death and became the first witnesses of his resurrection. Their Lord endured the cross, despising the shame, and Hebrews calls us to consider him so that we do not grow weary (Hebrews 12:2–3).
Who were the women, and how many?
There were most likely four women, Jesus’ mother, his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene. “His mother’s sister” is unnamed. Comparing the lists of women at the cross in Mark 15:40–41 and Matthew 27:56, some identify her with Salome, the mother of James and John, and others take “sister” in the wider sense of a close relative such as a cousin or sister-in-law.
In “Mary the wife of Cleophas” the KJV supplies “wife”, because the Greek has only María, the article (ho) and Klōpâs, “Mary the one of Clopas”. She is often identified with Mary the mother of James the less and Joses in those same lists, and an old tradition makes Clopas the brother of Joseph, which would make her Jesus’ aunt by marriage. If “his mother’s sister” and “Mary the wife of Cleophas” were one person, there would be three women and two sisters both called Mary, which is possible but less likely.
Woman, behold thy son
“When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved.” Eídō means to see, and in the depth of his suffering Jesus sees the two who stand closest to him. “Whom he loved” uses agapáō, to love, and this disciple is the one the church has long identified as John, the close companion of Jesus whose witness runs through this Gospel. To his mother Jesus says, “Woman, behold thy son!” Gynḗ means woman, and idoú, “behold”, calls for attention: look, see. Then to the disciple he says, “Behold thy mother!” with the same idoú.
“And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.” Lambánō means to take or receive. “Unto his own” is eis, into or to, with ídios, one’s own, and the Greek eis ta ídia reads “unto his own things”. The KJV supplies “home”, and the phrase means that the disciple received Mary into his own household and care. From that hour he provided for her as a son, and the word Jesus spoke from the cross was carried out at once.
Jesus was keeping the commandment, “Honour thy father and thy mother” (Exodus 20:12). In Israel a son, and above all the eldest, was responsible for his widowed mother. Joseph is last mentioned in Jesus’ youth, and without a husband or a believing son at hand Mary’s future would have been insecure in a world with little provision for the needy. So in his last hours, in great agony and shortly before the words that close his work on the cross (John 19:28–30), Jesus made sure that his mother would be cared for. He had taught that greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends (John 15:13), and as he lays down his life he is still providing for those he loves.
Why did Jesus call his mother “Woman”?
“Woman” was a respectful and formal way of addressing a woman in that day, and Jesus spoke to his mother the same way at the wedding in Cana (John 2:1–11). The English word sounds abrupt to modern ears, and the Greek carried no such harshness. At the cross it has a solemn weight. Jesus is speaking from the heart of his saving work, and some believers hear him addressing Mary in her place within it, as a figure of the faithful people of God or of the new family he is forming. On any reading, his words are full of love and care for her.
Why did Jesus give Mary to John and not to his brothers?
Jesus gave his mother to a disciple who believed in him and was standing at the cross, while his brothers had yet to believe in him (John 7:5). The Gospels name these brothers (Matthew 13:55, Mark 6:3), and they came to faith after his resurrection. They were praying with the disciples and with Mary in the upper room (Acts 1:14), and Paul later met James, the Lord’s brother (Galatians 1:19), who became a leader in the early church.
A new family at the foot of the cross
Jesus’ command provides for Mary, and it also shows the family he is forming. He had said that whoever does the will of God is his brother and sister and mother (Mark 3:35, Matthew 12:46–50), and at the cross a mother and a disciple, bound together by faith in him, become mother and son. In Christ we are all one, whatever our nation, rank or sex (Galatians 3:28), and we are fellowcitizens with the saints and of the household of God (Ephesians 2:19). Jesus is the firstborn among many brethren (Romans 8:29), and he calls those he sanctifies his brethren (Hebrews 2:11–12).
So the church is a family that bears one another’s burdens (Galatians 6:2), does good especially to the household of faith (Galatians 6:10), and loves one another as he has loved us (John 13:34–35). What the beloved disciple did for Mary from that hour, the people of Christ do for one another.
What the cross shows of our King
In this short stretch of John’s Gospel the cross is at once a place of the deepest shame and a royal proclamation. The man stripped of his clothes and hung between criminals is the King of the Jews, named so in three languages by the governor who condemned him, and the priests’ protest left the name in place. Every detail, from the place outside the gate to the soldiers’ lots, unfolds as God had said, so the cross stands as the hour God appointed, the hour for which the Son came. His death, watched by the women at the cross, sealed the new testament in his blood (Luke 22:20).
And the King on the cross is still caring for his own. While he bears the sin of the world, he sees his mother and his friend and gives them to each other. The Lord who now has all power in heaven and in earth knows those who stand near him and provides for them. Here we see who God is: faithful to every word he has spoken, ruling over governors and soldiers alike, and so loving that his Son spent his last hours meeting the needs of others. At the cross with John and the women we find a King to worship and a family to belong to.
John 19:17
“And he bearing his cross”
The condemned man carried his own crossbeam. In John’s account Jesus sets out with it himself, and Simon of Cyrene appears in the other three Gospels.
“went forth into a place called the place of a skull,”
He goes out of the city to the place of execution, so that he “suffered without the gate” (Hebrews 13:12).
“which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha:”
“Hebrew” here is the Aramaic of Judea, and Golgothâ means skull, as the Greek kraníon does.
John 19:18
“Where they crucified him,”
John gives the crucifixion in one plain word, stauróō, and leaves its cruelty undescribed.
“and two other with him, on either side one,”
Two condemned men, one on his right and one on his left, whom Matthew calls robbers.
“and Jesus in the midst.”
The middle place, among transgressors, where the sinless one took the place of sinners.
John 19:19
“And Pilate wrote a title,”
The governor chose the wording himself, which is why the priests bring their complaint to him.
“and put it on the cross.”
Fixed to the cross, usually above the head, so that every passer-by could read the charge.
“And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.”
Name, home town and charge. Meaning to record a crime, Pilate wrote the truth.
John 19:20
“This title then read many of the Jews:”
The title was meant to be read, and many did read it.
“for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city:”
Outside the walls but close to them, beside the Passover crowds.
“and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.”
The language of the people, of the wider world and of Rome, so the King was proclaimed to all of them.
John 19:21 This verse
“Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate,”
The men who had pressed for his death now quarrel over the words above his head.
“Write not, The King of the Jews;”
They object to a title that states his kingship as fact.
“but that he said, I am King of the Jews.”
Adding “he said” would make it a claim, a pretender’s boast.
John 19:22
“Pilate answered,”
The governor who gave way to them over Jesus’ life refuses them over a placard.
“What I have written I have written.”
In Greek ho gegrapha gegrapha. The title stays as it is, and God’s verdict on his Son stands with it.
John 19:23
“Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments,”
The executioners’ customary share of the condemned man’s clothing.
“and made four parts, to every soldier a part;”
Four shares for a squad of four soldiers.
“and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout.”
A tunic woven in one piece, worth more whole than torn, which explains what the soldiers do next.
John 19:24
“They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be:”
The coat goes to whoever wins the lot.
“that the scripture might be fulfilled,”
John points to one passage, Psalm 22:18.
“which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots.”
Two lines of the psalm, matched by two acts of the soldiers.
“These things therefore the soldiers did.”
The men who fulfilled the psalm were Roman soldiers going about their business.
John 19:25
“Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother,”
Mary is named first, and Simeon’s word about the sword comes true for her here.
“and his mother’s sister,”
Unnamed, perhaps Salome, perhaps another close relative.
“Mary the wife of Cleophas,”
The KJV supplies “wife” for a Greek phrase that reads “Mary of Clopas”.
“and Mary Magdalene.”
Soon to be the first to meet the risen Lord.
John 19:26
“When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved,”
In his agony Jesus sees the two who stand closest to him.
“he saith unto his mother,”
A personal word, spoken to her in the middle of a public execution.
“Woman, behold thy son!”
A respectful address, then a call to look on the disciple as her son.
John 19:27
“Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother!”
The second half of the command gives the disciple a son’s duty toward Mary.
“And from that hour”
The disciple obeys at once.
“that disciple took her unto his own home.”
Greek eis ta ídia, “unto his own”, that is, into his own household and care.
Last revised