Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
If G1508 I had G2064 not G1508 come G2064 and G2532 spoken G2980 unto them G846, they had G2192 not G3756 had G2192 sin G266: but G1161 now G3568 they have G2192 no G3756 cloke G4392 for G4012 their G846 sin G266.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
“If I had not come and spoken to them, they wouldn’t be guilty of sin; but now, they have no excuse for their sin.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin. Now, however, they have no excuse for their sin.
Ask
American Standard Version
If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no excuse for their sin.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have had sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If I had not come and spoken vnto them, they shoulde not haue had sinne: but nowe haue they no cloke for their sinne.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
if I had not come and spoken to them, they were not having sin; but now pretext they have not for their sin.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All John Sites (Levant)
All John Sites (Levant) View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,722 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

In John 15:22, Jesus declares to His disciples that His physical presence and spoken words among humanity have fundamentally altered the moral landscape, removing any possible justification or "cloke" for the world's sin and rejection of Him. Prior to His advent, humanity's sin, though real, existed in a context of less direct divine revelation; however, with the Incarnation and the clear proclamation of truth, willful unbelief becomes an inexcusable act of rebellion against the manifest light of God. This statement underscores the heightened accountability that accompanies divine revelation, emphasizing that ignorance can no longer serve as a valid defense for those who have encountered the Son of God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within Jesus' Farewell Discourse (John 13-17), delivered to His disciples in the upper room shortly before His crucifixion. Specifically, it falls within a section (John 15:18-16:4a) where Jesus prepares His followers for the world's hatred and persecution. Having just spoken about the intimate relationship between the vine and branches (John 15:1-17), signifying their union with Him and the Father, Jesus shifts to the inevitable opposition they will face from "the world." He explains that the world's hatred for them is a direct extension of its hatred for Him, and He provides the theological basis for this animosity: His coming has exposed the world's sin, rendering it inexcusable. This verse thus serves as a crucial bridge, explaining why the world hates Him and His disciples, connecting their rejection to a profound moral culpability.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Jesus' ministry took place in a Jewish society under Roman occupation, a context marked by diverse religious and political factions. The Jewish people, particularly their religious leaders, had received extensive revelation through the Law and the Prophets, yet many rejected Jesus as the Messiah. The "world" (κόσμος, kosmos) in John's Gospel often refers to humanity in its fallen, rebellious state, alienated from God and hostile to His truth. Jesus' claim to be the Son of God and the unique revelation of the Father challenged the prevailing religious paradigms and political aspirations of the time. His teachings and miraculous works were public, widely witnessed events, leaving little room for genuine ignorance among those who encountered Him. The concept of "cloke" or excuse resonates with legal and moral accountability prevalent in both Jewish and Roman legal systems, where a legitimate defense could mitigate guilt. Jesus' statement asserts that such a defense is now impossible regarding humanity's sin.
  • Key Themes: John 15:22 contributes significantly to several key themes within John's Gospel. Foremost is the theme of Revelation and Accountability, where Jesus' very presence and words serve as the ultimate divine self-disclosure, demanding a response and removing any excuse for unbelief. This ties into the broader Johannine theme of Light and Darkness, where Jesus is the "light of the world" John 8:12, and those who reject Him prefer darkness John 3:19-20. The verse also reinforces the Nature of Sin and Unbelief, portraying unbelief not merely as a lack of knowledge but as a willful, culpable rejection of truth when confronted with it. This deepens the understanding of the "world's" hostility, which is not born of misunderstanding but of an inherent antagonism toward God's revealed will, as seen in passages like John 1:10-11.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • come (Greek, érchomai', G2064): This verb signifies Jesus' incarnation—His physical advent into the world. It's not merely a casual visit but a purposeful, divine invasion of human history. The significance lies in the presence of God in human flesh, a direct, tangible revelation that transcends prior forms of divine communication.
  • spoken (Greek, laléō', G2980): This refers to Jesus' teaching, His authoritative proclamation of divine truth, and His revelation of the Father's will. Unlike the general revelation in creation or the specific revelation through the Law and Prophets, Jesus' words were the very words of God, spoken with unparalleled authority and clarity, making the divine will unmistakably known.
  • cloke (Greek, próphasis', G4392): This crucial term means an excuse, pretext, pretense, or a plausible reason given to conceal the real motive. In this context, it signifies any justification or defense that humanity might offer for its sin and unbelief. Jesus declares that His coming and speaking have stripped away all such pretenses, exposing sin for what it truly is: a deliberate, inexcusable rejection of God's manifest truth.

Verse Breakdown

  • "If I had not come and spoken unto them,": This is a conditional clause setting up the premise. "Come" refers to Jesus' incarnation and physical presence, while "spoken" refers to His authoritative teaching and revelation of God's truth. The "them" refers to the world, particularly those who witnessed His ministry and heard His words. Jesus is positing a hypothetical scenario where His earthly ministry did not occur.
  • "they had not had sin:": This does not mean humanity would have been sinless in an absolute sense before Jesus. Rather, it means their sin would not have been culpable in the same way or without excuse. Before Jesus, humanity's sin was against conscience, natural law, and the Mosaic Law. But in the absence of the ultimate revelation, there remained a degree of ignorance or a lack of full clarity that could, in some sense, be considered a "cloke."
  • "but now they have no cloke for their sin.": This is the emphatic conclusion, introduced by the strong adversative "but now." "Now" signifies the present reality established by Jesus' advent. His coming and speaking have removed any possible pretext, excuse, or justification for their continued unbelief and sin. The light has shone so brightly that those who reject it do so willfully, making their sin fully exposed and inexcusable before God.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices. A prominent one is Conditional Statement, "If I had not come and spoken unto them," which sets up a counterfactual scenario to highlight the profound impact of Jesus' actual ministry. This is immediately followed by a stark Contrast, "they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin," emphasizing the radical shift in human accountability due to Jesus' advent. The term "cloke" functions as a potent Metaphor, representing any excuse or covering for sin. Just as a physical cloak might hide something, an excuse attempts to conceal or mitigate guilt. Jesus declares this covering has been stripped away. Furthermore, the statement carries an element of Hyperbole or strong assertion, "no cloke," to underscore the absolute and undeniable nature of the world's guilt in the face of divine revelation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

John 15:22 profoundly articulates the principle of increased accountability in the face of divine revelation. Jesus' coming into the world, far from diminishing human responsibility, intensified it by bringing the ultimate truth directly to humanity. Prior to His advent, humanity's sin was measured against the light of conscience, creation, and the Law. However, with the Incarnation, God's very being and will were made manifest in Jesus, the Word made flesh. To reject Jesus, therefore, is not merely to err in judgment but to willfully spurn the clearest possible revelation of God, making such rejection an inexcusable act of rebellion. This verse highlights that encountering Jesus leaves no one neutral; it either leads to salvation through belief or to condemnation through willful unbelief, which is now utterly without defense.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jesus' words in John 15:22 serve as a profound challenge and a sobering reminder for every generation. For those who have encountered the gospel message, whether through direct witness, the Scriptures, or the testimony of believers, the principle remains: the greater the light received, the greater the responsibility to walk in it. We can no longer claim ignorance or misunderstanding as valid excuses for our sin or our rejection of Christ. This verse calls us to examine our own hearts: have we truly embraced the truth revealed in Jesus, or are we clinging to "clokes"—pretexts, rationalizations, or self-justifications—for our continued disobedience or unbelief? The removal of excuses means that our response to Jesus is a direct reflection of our heart's posture towards God Himself. It urges us to respond with humility, repentance, and faith, recognizing the immense privilege and solemn responsibility of having received such clear and compelling revelation.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I be consciously or unconsciously clinging to "clokes" or excuses for areas of sin or unbelief in my life?
  • How does Jesus' statement about having "no cloke for their sin" deepen my appreciation for the grace offered through the Gospel?
  • What specific actions can I take to ensure I am not merely hearing the truth but actively living in response to it?
  • How does this verse challenge my understanding of accountability, both for myself and for those who have heard the Gospel but rejected it?

FAQ

What does "cloke" mean in the context of John 15:22, and why is it significant?

Answer: In John 15:22, "cloke" translates the Greek word prophasis (προφασις), which means an excuse, a pretext, a pretense, or a plausible reason given to conceal the real motive. Its significance lies in Jesus' declaration that His coming and speaking have stripped away any such justification for humanity's sin and unbelief. Before Jesus, people might have claimed ignorance or a lack of full understanding of God's will. However, with the Incarnation, God's truth was made unmistakably clear through Jesus' life, teachings, and miracles. Therefore, continued rejection of Him is no longer attributable to ignorance but to willful rebellion, leaving no legitimate excuse or "cloke" to hide behind. This highlights the heightened accountability that comes with direct divine revelation.

Does John 15:22 imply that people before Jesus' coming were not sinful or were less accountable?

Answer: No, John 15:22 does not imply that people before Jesus' coming were not sinful or were completely without accountability. The Bible consistently teaches that all humanity is sinful (e.g., Romans 3:23). People before Jesus were accountable to God based on the general revelation in creation (Romans 1:19-20) and, for Israel, the specific revelation of the Law (Romans 2:12-16). What Jesus' statement means is that His advent brought a new, unparalleled level of divine revelation. His presence and words removed any remaining pretense of ignorance or misunderstanding that might have served as a "cloke" for sin. The sin of rejecting the incarnate Son of God is of a different, more culpable magnitude than sin committed without such direct revelation.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

John 15:22 finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus Himself as the ultimate and complete revelation of God. He is not merely a messenger but the message, the very Word made flesh (John 1:14). His coming and speaking are the culmination of God's self-disclosure, making the Father known in a way previously unimaginable (John 14:9). Therefore, the "cloke" for sin is removed because the light of truth has shone in its fullness, exposing the darkness of human rebellion for what it truly is. Yet, in a beautiful paradox, the very One who removes all excuses for sin is also the One who provides the true covering for sin. Through His sacrificial death on the cross, Jesus became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering forgiveness and reconciliation to all who believe. He is the propitiation for our sins (1 John 2:2), providing the ultimate "cloke"—a spiritual covering of righteousness—that allows us to stand blameless before God, unlike the empty pretexts that offer no defense. Thus, Jesus, by His coming, both exposes our inexcusable sin and graciously offers the only true means of its atonement.

Copy as

Commentary on John 15 verses 18–25

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here Christ discourses concerning hatred, which is the character and genius of the devil's kingdom, as love is of the kingdom of Christ. Observe here,

I. Who they are in whom this hatred is found - the world, the children of this world, as distinguished from the children of God; those who are in the interests of the god of this world, whose image they bear, and whose power they are subject to; all those, whether Jews or Gentiles, who would not come into the church of Christ, which he audibly called, and visibly separates from this evil world. The calling of these the world intimates, 1. Their number; there were a world of people that opposed Christ and Christianity. Lord, how were they increased that troubled the Son of David! I fear, if we should put it to the vote between Christ and Satan, Satan would out-poll us quite. 2. Their confederacy and combination; these numerous hosts are embodied, and are as one, Psa 83:5. Jews and Gentiles, that could agree in nothing else, agreed to persecute Christ's minister. 3. Their spirit and disposition; they are men of the world (Psa 17:13, Psa 17:14), wholly devoted to this world and the things of it, and never thinking of another world. The people of God, though they are taught to hate the sins of sinners, yet not their persons, but to love and do good to all men. A malicious, spiteful, envious spirit, is not the spirit of Christ, but of the world.

II. Who are they against whom this hatred is levelled-against the disciples of Christ, against Christ himself, and against the Father.

1.The world hates the disciples of Christ: The world hateth you (Joh 15:19); and he speaks of it as that which they must expect and count upon, Joh 15:18, as Jo1 3:13.

(1.)Observe how this comes in here. [1.] Christ had expressed the great kindness he had for them as friends; but, lest they should be puffed up with this, there was given them, as there was to Paul, a thorn in the flesh, that is, as it is explained there, reproaches and persecutions for Christ's sake, Co2 12:7, Co2 12:10. [2.] He had appointed them their work, but tells them what hardships they should meet with in it, that it might not be a surprise to them, and that they might prepare accordingly. [3.] He had charged them to love one another, and need enough they had to love one another, for the world would hate them; to be kind to one another, for they would have a great deal of unkindness and ill-will from those that were without. "Keep peace among yourselves, and this will fortify you against the world's quarrels with you." Those that are in the midst of enemies are concerned to hold together.

(2.)Observe what is here included.

[1.]The world's enmity against the followers of Christ: it hateth them. Note, Whom Christ blesseth the world curseth. The favourites and heirs of heaven have never been the darlings of this world, since the old enmity was put between the seed of the woman and of the serpent. Why did Cain hate Abel, but because his works were righteous? Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing; Joseph's brethren hated him because his father loved him; Saul hated David because the Lord was with him; Ahab hated Micaiah because of his prophecies; such are the causeless causes of the world's hatred.

[2.]The fruits of that enmity, two of which we have here, Joh 15:20. First, They will persecute you, because they hate you, for hatred is a restless passion. It is the common lot of those who will live godly in Christ Jesus to suffer persecution, Ti2 3:12. Christ foresaw what ill usage his ambassadors would meet with in the world, and yet, for the sake of those few that by their ministry were to be called out of the world, he sent them forth as sheep in the midst of wolves. Secondly, Another fruit of their enmity is implied, that they would reject their doctrine. When Christ says, If they have kept my sayings, they will keep yours, he means, They will keep yours, and regard yours, no more than they have regarded and kept mine. Note, The preachers of the gospel cannot but take the despising of their message to be the greatest injury that can be done to themselves; as it was a great affront to Jeremiah to say, Let us not give heed to any of his words, Jer 18:18.

[3.]The causes of that enmity. The world will hate them,

First, Because they do not belong to it (Joh 15:19): "If you were of the world, of its spirit, and in its interests, if you were carnal and worldly, the world would love you as its own; but, because you are called out of the world, it hates you, and ever will." Note, 1. We are not to wonder if those that are devoted to the world are caressed by it as its friends; most men bless the covetous, Psa 10:3; Psa 49:18. 2. Nor are we to wonder if those that are delivered from the world are maligned by it as its enemies; when Israel is rescued out of Egypt, the Egyptians will pursue them. Observe, The reason why Christ's disciples are not of the world is not because they have by their own wisdom and virtue distinguished themselves from the world, but because Christ hath chosen them out of it, to set them apart for himself; and this is the reason why the world hates them; for, (1.) The glory which by virtue of this choice they are designed for sets them above the world, and so makes them the objects of its envy. The saints shall judge the world, and the upright have dominion, and therefore they are hated. (2.) The grace which by virtue of this choice they are endued with sets them against the world; they swim against the stream of the world, and are not conformed to it; they witness against it, and are not conformed to it. This would support them under all the calamities which the world's hatred would bring upon them, that they were hated because they were the choice and the chosen ones of the Lord Jesus, and were not of the world. Now, [1.] This was no just cause for the world's hatred of them. If we do any thing to make ourselves hateful, we have reason to lament it; but, if men hate us for that for which they should love and value us, we have reason to pity them, but no reason to perplex ourselves. Nay, [2.] This was just cause for their own joy. He that is hated because he is rich and prospers cares not who has the vexation of it, while he has the satisfaction of it.

- Populus me sibilat, at mihi plaudo

Ipse domi -

- Let them hiss on, he cries,

While in my own opinion fully blessed.

- Timon in Hor.

Much more may those hug themselves whom the world hates, but whom Christ loves.

Secondly, "Another cause of the world's hating you will be because you do belong to Christ (Joh 15:21): For my name's sake." Here is the core of the controversy; whatever is pretended, this is the ground of the quarrel, they hate Christ's disciples because they bear his name, and bear up his name in the world. Note, 1. It is the character of Christ's disciples that they stand up for his name. The name into which they were baptized is that which they will live and die by. 2. It has commonly been the lot of those that appear for Christ's name to suffer for so doing, to suffer many things, and hard things, all these things. It is matter of comfort to the greatest sufferers if they suffer for Christ's name's sake. If you be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are you (Pe1 4:14), happy indeed, considering not only the honour that is imprinted upon those sufferings (Act 5:41), but the comfort that is infused into them, and especially the crown of glory which those sufferings lead to. If we suffer with Christ, and for Christ, we shall reign with him.

Thirdly, After all, it is the world's ignorance that is the true cause of its enmity to the disciples of Christ (Joh 15:21): Because they know not him that sent me. 1. They know not God. If men had but a due acquaintance with the very first principles of natural religion, and did but know God, though they did not embrace Christianity, yet they could not hate and persecute it. Those have no knowledge who eat up God's people, Psa 14:4. 2. They know not God as he that sent our Lord Jesus, and authorized him to be the great Mediator of the peace. We do not rightly know God if we do not know him in Christ, and those who persecute those whom he sends make it to appear that they know not that he was sent of God. See Co1 2:8.

2.The world hates Christ himself. And this is spoken of here for two ends: -

(1.)To mitigate the trouble of his followers, arising from the world's hatred, and to make it the less strange, and the less grievous (Joh 15:18): You know that it hated me before you, prōton humōn. We read it as signifying priority of time; he began in the bitter cup of suffering, and then left us to pledge him; but it may be read as expressing his superiority over them: "You know that it hated me, your first, your chief and captain, your leader and commander." [1.] If Christ, who excelled in goodness, and was perfectly innocent and universally beneficent, was hated, can we expect that any virtue or merit of ours should screen us from malice? [2.] If our Master, the founder of our religion, met with so much opposition in the planting of it, his servants and followers can look for no other in propagating and professing it. For this he refers them (Joh 15:20) to his own word, at their admission into discipleship: Remember the word that I said unto you. It would help us to understand Christ's latter sayings to compare them with his former sayings. Nor would any thing contribute more to the making of us easy than remembering the words of Christ, which will expound his providences. Now in this word there is, First, A plain truth: The servant is not greater than his Lord. This he had said to them. Mat 10:24. Christ is our Lord, and therefore we must diligently attend all his motions, and patiently acquiesce in all his disposals, for the servant is inferior to his lord. The plainest truths are sometimes the strongest arguments for the hardest duties; Elihu answers a multitude of Job's murmurings with this one self-evident truth, that God is greater than man, Job 33:12. So here is, Secondly, A proper inference drawn from it: "If they have persecuted men, as you have seen, and are likely to see much more, they will also persecute you; you may expect it and count upon it: for," 1. "You will do the same that I have done to provoke them; you will reprove them for their sins, and call them to repentance, and give them strict rules of holy living, which they will not bear." 2. "You cannot do more than I have done to oblige them; after so great an instance, let none wonder if they suffer ill for doing well." He adds, "If they have kept my sayings, they will keep yours also; as there have been a few, and but a few, that have been wrought upon by my preaching, so there will be by yours a few, and but a few." Some give another sense of this, making etērēsan to be put for parētērēsan. "If they have lain in wait for my sayings, with a design to ensnare me, they will in like manner lie in wait to entangle you in your talk."

(2.)To aggravate the wickedness of this unbelieving world, and to discover its exceeding sinfulness; to hate and persecute the apostles was bad enough, but in them to hate and persecute Christ himself was much worse. The world is generally in an ill name in scripture, and nothing can put it into a worse name than this, that it hated Jesus Christ. There is a world of people that are haters of Christ. Two things he insists upon to aggravate the wickedness of those that hated him: -

[1.]That there was the greatest reason imaginable why they should love him; men's good words and good works usually recommend them; now as to Christ,

First, His words were such as merited their love (Joh 15:22): "If I had not spoken unto them, to court their love, they had not had sin, their opposition had not amounted to a hatred of me, their sin had been comparatively no sin. But now that I have said so much to them to recommend myself to their best affections they have no pretence, no excuse for their sin." Observe here, 1. The advantage which those have that enjoy the gospel; Christ in it comes and speaks to them; he spoke in person to the men of that generation, and is still speaking to us by our Bibles and ministers, and as one that has the most unquestionable authority over us, and affection for us. Every word of his is pure, carries with it a commanding majesty, and yet a condescending tenderness, able, one would think, to charm the deafest adder. 2. The excuse which those have that enjoy not the gospel: "If I had not spoken to them, if they had ever heard of Christ and of salvation by him, they had not had sin." (1.) Not this kind of sin. They had not been chargeable with a contempt of Christ if he had not come and made a tender of his grace to them. As sin is not imputed where there is no law, so unbelief is not imputed where there is no gospel; and, where it is imputed, it is thus far the only damning sin, that, being a sin against the remedy, other sin would not damn if the guilt of them were not bound on with this. (2.) Not such a degree of sin. If they had not had the gospel among them, their other sins had not been so bad; for the times of ignorance God winked at, Luk 12:47, Luk 12:48. 3. The aggravated guilt which those lie under to whom Christ has come and spoken in vain, whom he has called and invited in vain, with whom he has reasoned and pleaded in vain; They have no cloak for their sin; they are altogether inexcusable, and in the judgment day will be speechless, and will not have a word to say for themselves. Note, The clearer and fuller the discoveries are which are made to us of the grace and truth of Jesus Christ, the more is said to us that is convincing and endearing, the greater is our sin if we do not love him and believe in him. The word of Christ strips sin of its cloak, that it may appear sin.

Secondly, His works were such as merited their love, as well as his words (Joh 15:24): "If I had not done among them, in their country, and before their eyes, such works as no other man ever did, they had not had sin; their unbelief and enmity had been excusable, and they might have had some colour to say that my word was not to be credited, if not otherwise confirmed;" but he produced satisfactory proofs of his divine mission, works which no other man did. Note, 1. As the Creator demonstrates his power and Godhead by his works (Rom 1:20), so doth the Redeemer. His miracles, his mercies, works of wonder and works of grace, prove him sent of God, and sent on a kind errand. 2. Christ's works were such as no man ever did. No common person that had not a commission from heaven, and God with him, could work miracles, Joh 3:2. And no prophet ever wrought such miracles, so many, so illustrious. Moses and Elias wrought miracles as servants, by a derived power; but Christ, as a Son, by his own power. This was it that amazed the people, that with authority he commanded diseases and devils (Mar 1:27); they owned they never saw the like, Mar 2:12. They were all good works, works of mercy; and this seems especially intended here, for he is upbraiding them with this, that they hated him. One that was so universally useful, more than ever any man was, one would think, should have been universally beloved, and yet even he is hated. 3. The works of Christ enhance the guilt of sinners' infidelity and enmity to him, to the last degree of wickedness and absurdity. If they had only heard his words, and not seen his works, - if we had only his sermons upon record, and not his miracles, unbelief might have pleaded want of proof; but now it has no excuse. Nay, the rejecting of Christ, both by them and us, has in it the sin, not only of obstinate unbelief, but of base ingratitude. They saw Christ to be most amiable, and studious to do them a kindness; yet they hated him, and studied to do him mischief. And we see in his word that great love wherewith he loved us, and yet are not wrought upon by it.

[2.]That there was no reason at all why they should hate him. Some that at one time will say and do that which is recommending, yet at another time will say and do that which is provoking and disobliging; but our Lord Jesus not only did much to merit men's esteem and good-will, but never did any thing justly to incur their displeasure; this he pleads by quoting a scripture for it (Joh 15:25): "This comes to pass, this unreasonable hatred of me, and of my disciples for my sake, that the word might be fulfilled which is written in their law" (that is, in the Old Testament, which is a law, and was received by them as a law), "They hated me without a cause;" this David speaks of himself as a type of Christ, Psa 35:19; Psa 69:4. Not, First, Those that hate Christ hate him without any just cause; enmity to Christ is unreasonable enmity. We think those deserve to be hated that are haughty and froward, but Christ is meek and lowly, compassionate and tender; those also that under colour of complaisance are malicious, envious, and revengeful, but Christ devoted himself to the service of those that used him, nay, and of those that abused him; toiled for others' ease, and impoverished himself to enrich us. Those we think hateful that are hurtful to kings and provinces, and disturbers of the public peace; but Christ, on the contrary, was the greatest blessing imaginable to his country, and yet was hated. He testified indeed that their works were evil, with a design to make them good, but to hate him for this cause was to hate him without cause. Secondly, Herein the scripture was fulfilled, and the antitype answered the type. Saul and his courtiers hated David without cause, for he had been serviceable to him with his harp, and with his sword; Absalom and his party hated him, though to him he had been an indulgent father, and to them a great benefactor. Thus was the Son of David hated, and hunted most unjustly. Those that hated Christ did not design there in to fulfil the scripture; but God, in permitting it, had that in his eye; and it confirms our faith in Christ as the Messiah that even this was foretold concerning him, and, being foretold, was accomplished in him. And we must not think it strange or hard if it have a further accomplishment in us. We are apt to justify our complaints of injuries done us with this, that they are causeless, whereas the more they are so the more they are like the sufferings of Christ, and may be the more easily borne.

3.In Christ the world hates God himself; this is twice said here (Joh 15:23): He that hateth me, though he thinks his hatred goes no further, yet really he hates my Father also. And again, Joh 15:24, They have seen and hated both me and my Father. Note, (1.) There are those that hate God, notwithstanding the beauty of his nature and the bounty of his providence; they are enraged at his justice, as the devils that believe it and tremble, are vexed at his dominion, and would gladly break his bands asunder. Those who cannot bring themselves to deny that there is a God, and yet wish there were none, they see and hate him. (2.) Hatred of Christ will be construed and adjudged hatred of God, for he is in his person his Father's express image, and in his office his great agent and ambassador. God will have all men to honour the Son as they honour the Father, and therefore what entertainment the Son has, that the Father has. Hence it is easy to infer that those who are enemies to the Christian religion, however they may cry up natural religion, are really enemies to all religion. Deists are in effect atheists, and those that ridicule the light of the gospel would, if they could, extinguish even natural light, and shake off all obligations of conscience and the fear of God. Let an unbelieving malignant world know that their enmity to the gospel of Christ will be looked upon in the great day as an enmity to the blessed God himself; and let all that suffer for righteousness' sake, according to the will of God, take comfort from this; if God himself be hated in them, and struck at through him, they need not be either ashamed of their cause or afraid of the issue.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 18–25. Public domain.
Copy as
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
ON FIRST PRINCIPLES 1.3.6
That declaration in the Gospel, “If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have had sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin,” makes it clear to all who are rational just how long a time a person is without sin and just when he is liable to sin. By participating in the word or reason, people are said to have sinned, that is, from the time they are capable of understanding, from the time that the reason implanted within them suggests to them the difference between good and evil. After they have begun to know what evil is, they are liable for any sin they commit.This is the meaning of the expression that “people have no excuse for their sin,” namely, that from the time the divine word or reason has begun to show them internally the difference between good and evil, they ought to avoid and guard against evil: “For to the one who knows to do good and does not do it, to him it is sin.”
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Exposition of the Christian Faith 4.2.27
The mystery of Christ is so great that even angels stood amazed and bewildered before it. This is why, then, it is your duty to worship him and, as a servant, this is why you should not detract from your Lord. You cannot plead ignorance because establishing your faith is why he came down in the first place. If you do not believe, he has not come down for you or suffered for you. “If I had not come,” says the Scripture, “and spoken to them, they would not have sin. But now they have no excuse for their sin. Whoever hates me hates my Father also.” Who, then, hates Christ, if not the one who speaks to his dishonor? For just as it is love’s part to render honor, so it is hate’s part to withdraw honor. The one who hates calls into question Christ’s honor; the one who loves, pays reverence.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on the Gospel of John 77
"If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin."

Showing that they shall do unjustly both what they do against Him and against them. "Why then didst Thou bring us into such calamities? Didst Thou not foreknow the wars, the hatred?"
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. lxxvii. 2) Then by way of another consolation, He declares the injustice of these persecutions both towards Him and them: If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Tractates on John 89
The Lord had said above to His disciples, "If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not Him that sent me." And if we inquire of whom He so spake, we find that He was led on to these words from what He had said before, "If the world hate you, know ye that it hated me before it hated you;" and now in adding, "If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin," He more expressly pointed to the Jews. Of them, therefore, He also uttered the words that precede, for so does the context itself imply. For it is of the same parties that He said, "If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin;" of whom He also said, "If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also; but all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not Him that sent me;" for it is to these words that He also subjoins the following: "If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin." The Jews, therefore, persecuted Christ, as the Gospel very clearly indicates, and Christ spake to the Jews, not to other nations; and it is they, therefore, that He meant to be understood by the world, that hateth Christ and His disciples; and, indeed, not those alone, but even these latter were shown by Him to belong to the same world. What, then, does He mean by the words, "If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin"? Was it that the Jews were without sin before Christ came to them in the flesh? Who, though he were the greatest fool, would say so? But it is some great sin, and not every sin, that He would have to be understood, as it were, under the general designation. For this is the sin wherein all sins are included; and whosoever is free from it, has all his sins forgiven him: and this it is, that they believed not on Christ, who came for the very purpose of enlisting their faith. From this sin, had He not come, they would certainly have been free. His advent has become as much fraught with destruction to unbelievers, as it is with salvation to those that believe; for He, the Head and Prince of the apostles, has Himself, as it were, become what they declared of themselves, "to some, indeed, the savour of life unto life; and to some the savor of death unto death."
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Tractates on John 89
But when He went on to say, "But now they have no excuse for their sin," some may be moved to inquire whether those to whom Christ neither came nor spake, have an excuse for their sin. For if they have not, why is it said here that these had none, on the very ground that He did come and speak to them? And if they have, have they it to the extent of thereby being barred from punishment, or of receiving it in a milder degree? To these inquiries, with the Lord's help and to the best of my capacity, I reply, that such have an excuse, not for every one of their sins, but for this sin of not believing on Christ, inasmuch as He came not and spake not to them. But it is not in the number of such that those are to be included, to whom He came in the persons of His disciples, and to whom He spake by them, as He also does at present; for by His Church He has come, and by His Church He speaks to the Gentiles. For to this are to be referred the words that He spake, "He that receiveth you, receiveth me;" and, "He that despiseth you, despiseth me." "Or would ye," says the Apostle Paul, "have a proof of Him that speaketh in me, namely Christ."
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tract. lxxxix. 1) Christ spoke to the Jews only, not to any other nation. In them then was that world which hated Christ and His disciples; and not only in them, but in us also. Were the Jews then without sin before Christ came in the flesh, because Christ had not spoken to them? By sin here He means not every sin, but a certain great sin, which includes all, and which alone hinders the remission of other sins, viz. unbelief. They did not believe in Christ, who came that they might believe on Him. This sin then they would not have had, had not Christ come; for Christ's advent, as it was the salvation of the believing, so was the perdition of the unbelieving. But now they have no cloke for their sin. If those to whom Christ had not come or spoken, had not an excuse (προφασιν, excusationem Vulg. cloke E. T.) for their sin, why is it said here that these had no excuse, because Christ had come and spoken to them? If the first had excuse, did it do away with their punishment altogether, or only mitigate it? I answer, that this excuse covered, not all their sin, but only this one, viz. that they did not believe in Christ. But they are not of this number to whom Christ came by His disciples: they are not to be let off with a lighter punishment, who altogether refused to receive Christ's love, and, as far as concerned them, wished its destruction. This excuse they may have who died before they heard of Christ's Gospel; but this will not shield them from damnation. He perishes to God, who is punished with an exclusion from that happiness which is given to the saints. But there is as great a diversity of punishments, as there is of sins: though how this is settled is a matter known to the Divine Wisdom indeed, but too deep for human conjecture to examine or pronounce upon.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Tractates on John 89
It remains for us to inquire, whether those who, prior to the coming of Christ in His Church to the Gentiles and to their hearing of His Gospel, have been, or are now being, overtaken by the close of this life, can have such an excuse? Evidently they can, but not on that account can they escape damnation. "For as many as have sinned without the law, shall also perish without the law; and as many as have sinned in the law, shall be judged by the law." And these words of the apostle, inasmuch as his saying, "they shall perish," has a more terrible sound than when he says, "they shall be judged," seem to show that such an excuse can not only avail them nothing, but even becomes an additional aggravation. For those that excuse themselves because they did not hear, "shall perish without the law."
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Tractates on John 89
But it is also a worthy subject of inquiry, whether those who met the words they heard with contempt, and even with opposition, and that not merely by contradicting them, but also by persecuting in their hatred those from whom they heard them, are to be reckoned among those in regard to whom the words, "they shall be judged by the law," convey somewhat of a milder sound. But if it is one thing to perish without the law, and another to be judged by the law; and the former is the heavier, the latter the lighter punishment: such, without a doubt, are not to have their place assigned in that lighter measure of punishment; for, so far from sinning in the law, they utterly refused to accept the law of Christ, and, as far as in them lay, would have had it altogether annihilated. But those that sin in the law, are such as are in the law, that is, who accept it, and confess that it is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good; but fail through infirmity in fulfilling what they cannot doubt is most righteously enjoined therein. These are they in regard to whose fate there may perhaps be some distinction made from the perdition of those who are without the law: and yet if the apostle's words, "they shall be judged by the law," are to be understood as meaning, they shall not perish, what a wonder if it were so. For his discourse was not about infidels and believers to lead him to say so, but about Gentiles and Jews, both of whom, certainly, if they find not salvation in that Saviour who came to seek that which was lost, shall doubtless become the prey of perdition; although it may be said that some shall perish in a more terrible, others in a more mitigated sense; in other words, that some shall suffer a heavier, and others a lighter penalty in their perdition. For he is rightly said to perish as regards God, whoever is separated by punishment from that blessedness which He bestows on His saints, and the diversity of punishments is as great as the diversity of sins; but the mode thereof is accounted too deep by divine wisdom for human guessing to scrutinize or express. At all events, those to whom Christ came, and to whom He spake, have not, for their great sin of unbelief, any such excuse as may enable them to say, We saw not, we heard not: whether it be that such an excuse would not be sustained by Him whose judgments are unsearchable, or whether it would, and that, if not for their entire deliverance from damnation, at least for its partial alleviation.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 10
We may take in two ways the meaning of the words before us. For if any one should suppose that this passage was directed against Greeks and Jews alike, we say that unless the Divine and heavenly message, I mean the Gospel, had come to all that are on the earth, pointing out to each individual the way of salvation and making plain the works of righteousness, their complete ignorance of what is pleasing to God would perhaps have been a strong reason in each case for the pardon of those who are not eager in pursuing virtue. This ignorance of theirs makes them seem worthy of pardon. But whereas the word of the Gospel has been directed to all men, what reason for pardon is there, or with what words should any one address Him that judgeth, when accused after knowledge of the worst crimes? But if the Lord is saying this concerning the Jews only, as having very often listened to His teaching, and as being in no way ignorant of what He commanded them to think and do, let Him illustrate it thus: They will not endure your teaching, He says, but will bring upon you trials and persecutions, and will devise against you every kind of terror, and from their bitterness will be consumed with an unjust hatred against you, not able indeed to charge you with any wickedness, but blaming only your love towards Me. But searching as it were for an excuse for the cruelty of their madness, and diminishing the baseness of their love of self-gratification, they will actually cite Moses and the books of Moses, and will pretend that I was an opponent of their ancestral laws. But if I had not come and set forth commands superior to the Law given by Moses; if I had not fulfilled it by many words, showing that it was now high time to pass beyond mere types, and that there had been enough of patterns and shadows, but that the hour had come in which the truth itself should shine forth; if I had not shown this from the Law itself, saying in the clearest language, If ye believed Moses, ye would believe Me; for he wrote of Me; if I had not made it clear that My word harmonized with the testimonies of the prophets, and that the power of My Presence had already been predicted and proclaimed, they would have had reasonable grounds for their madness against Me and you. Since nothing has been left out, but everything that was essential has been said, the reason which they have devised to cover the nakedness of their sin is vain.

This consideration then I think should harmonize with the words of the Saviour; but in showing the terrible charges that will be brought against those who injure them, and in saying that those who dare to do such things will one day be chastised, He removes the greater part of their grief and wisely withdraws that which was likely to cause them no small pain. For the conviction that the workers of wickedness will pay the penalty of their crimes sometimes makes it possible to those who are injured to endure their wickedness. And, knowing this, the Master of all things says: Vengeance belongeth unto Me; I will recompense, saith the Lord. Nay, even the blessed Paul himself, when struck by one of the high priests, had no other consolation for the bitterness of suffering than this that we have mentioned. For what did he say?----God shall smite thee, thou whited wall. This then is a medicine for human weakness----I mean the expectation of the punishment of those who have chosen to act unjustly. Our Lord, however, is superior to and above human littleness. When He was reviled, He reviled not again; when He suffered, He threatened not, according to the Scripture. But when struck on the face, He made no angry remark, nor threatened the man who dared to strike Him, but answered indeed with the greatest mildness and forbearance, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well, why smitest thou Me? The word then of the prophet is true: Who shall be made equal to the Lord in the clouds, or who shall be likened to the Lord among the sons of God?
Gregory the Dialogist (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 604
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(xxv. Moral.) It is one thing not to do good, another to hate the teacher of goodness; as there is a difference between sudden and deliberate sins. Our state generally is that we love what is good, but from infirmity cannot perform it. But to sin of set purpose, is neither to do nor to love what is good. As then it is sometimes a heavier offence to love than to do, so is it more wicked to hate justice than not to do it. There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate wilful sin.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 15:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.