Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgment.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Great men H7227 are not always wise H2449: neither do the aged H2205 understand H995 judgment H4941.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
it isn't [only] the great who are wise or the aged who know how to judge.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
It is not only the old who are wise, or the elderly who understand justice.
Ask
American Standard Version
It is not the great that are wise, Nor the aged that understand justice.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
It is not the great who are wise, nor the aged who understand justice.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Great men are not alway wise, neither doe the aged alway vnderstand iudgement.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
The multitude are not wise, Nor do the aged understand judgment.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 32:9 marks a pivotal turning point in the book of Job, introducing Elihu, a younger man, who steps forward to challenge the long-standing and ultimately unhelpful debate between Job and his three elder friends. This verse serves as Elihu's foundational premise, asserting that wisdom and sound judgment are not inherent qualities of status or advanced age. He critiques the prevailing cultural assumption that "great men" or "the aged" automatically possess superior understanding, thereby clearing the ground for a fresh, divinely-inspired perspective that anticipates God's direct intervention and emphasizes the spiritual origin of true wisdom.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Job 32:9 immediately follows Elihu's introduction, where he explains his profound patience in listening to the extensive arguments of Job and his three friends—Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar. Elihu expresses his frustration, stating that he waited for the elders to speak, assuming wisdom would naturally reside with them, but he found their arguments insufficient to convince Job or to resolve the profound theological dilemma of innocent suffering. This verse, therefore, functions as Elihu's opening declaration, a direct and audacious challenge to the perceived authority and wisdom of the older, more established figures. It sets the stage for his subsequent, extensive discourse (Job 32-37), which aims to reframe the discussion about God's justice, sovereignty, and the purpose of suffering, ultimately preparing the reader for God's own direct address from the whirlwind in Job 38. Elihu's intervention is crucial, shifting the dialogue from a narrow focus on Job's presumed sin to a deeper exploration of God's ways and the inherent limitations of human understanding.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Near Eastern societies, age and social standing were profoundly revered and often equated with wisdom and authority. Elders, known as z'qenim, were traditionally seen as repositories of life experience, practical wisdom, and sound judgment, frequently serving as counselors, arbiters, and leaders in community affairs. "Great men" (g'dolim) referred to those of high social status, influential leaders, or prominent figures whose opinions carried significant weight and were rarely challenged. Elihu's statement in Job 32:9 directly confronts this deeply ingrained cultural reverence and societal norm. By declaring that neither status nor age guarantees wisdom or understanding of judgment, Elihu subverts a foundational cultural expectation. This audacious challenge from a younger man highlights the extraordinary nature of his intervention and underscores the book's broader theological message that divine truth often transcends conventional human categories and expectations, emerging from unexpected sources.
  • Key Themes: Job 32:9 powerfully introduces and amplifies several key themes that resonate throughout the book of Job and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Wisdom vs. Human Wisdom. Elihu posits that true wisdom and understanding of God's intricate ways are not inherent in human experience, social status, or advanced age, but are gifts from God, often revealed through His Spirit, as he explicitly states in Job 32:8. This establishes a stark contrast with the limited, often flawed human reasoning displayed by Job's friends and even Job himself. Secondly, the verse implicitly calls for Humility in Knowledge. By challenging the presumed authority of the "great men" and "aged," Elihu suggests that even those held in high esteem can err significantly, emphasizing the profound need for intellectual humility and openness to divine revelation. This theme anticipates God's humbling questions to Job in Job 38-41, which expose the vast chasm between human and divine understanding. Lastly, the verse functions as a Critique of Conventional Authority, demonstrating that valuable insights and truth can emerge from unexpected sources, challenging the notion that truth is solely the domain of established figures or those with the most experience. This prepares the reader for Elihu's own significant contribution to the theological dialogue, despite his younger, less prominent status.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Great men (Hebrew, rab', H7227): This term (H7227) signifies abundance in various aspects, including quantity, size, and crucially, rank or quality. In this context, it refers to individuals of high social standing, importance, or influence, often denoting leaders or prominent figures. Elihu's use of this term is a direct challenge to the perceived authority and the weight given to the arguments of Job's three friends, who were likely respected and influential figures in their communities, based on their status.
  • aged (Hebrew, zâqên', H2205): This word (H2205) specifically denotes "old" or "elder." In ancient Near Eastern societies, elders were traditionally seen as the custodians of wisdom, experience, and tradition, often serving as community leaders and counselors. Elihu's assertion that the aged do not necessarily "understand judgment" is a radical departure from this deeply ingrained cultural norm, directly undermining the automatic reverence and presumed wisdom associated with years of experience.
  • judgment (Hebrew, mishpâṭ', H4941): This multifaceted term (H4941) properly refers to a verdict, a formal decree, or a sentence, encompassing divine law, justice, and the act of discerning what is right. In Job 32:9, it signifies the capacity to understand God's ways, to discern truth in complex situations (such as the mystery of Job's suffering), and to render a correct verdict or interpretation of events. Elihu argues that this crucial understanding of divine justice and discernment is not guaranteed by age or social status.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Great men are not [always] wise": This clause serves as Elihu's initial, bold declaration, directly confronting the deeply held assumption that social standing, prominence, or worldly influence automatically confers true wisdom. The bracketed "always" in the KJV is an interpretive addition, but it accurately conveys the sense that wisdom is not an inherent or guaranteed quality of those in positions of power or influence. Elihu implies that the arguments presented by Job's friends, despite their esteemed status, lacked genuine insight into Job's profound suffering or the deeper character of God.
  • "neither do the aged understand judgment": This second clause reinforces and expands upon the first, specifically targeting the cultural veneration of elders. Elihu asserts that even those with many years of life experience do not necessarily possess true discernment or the ability to grasp the intricacies of divine justice (mishpâṭ). This statement challenges the very foundation of traditional wisdom, suggesting that age, while bringing valuable experience, does not automatically grant spiritual or theological understanding, especially concerning the complex ways of God.

Literary Devices

Elihu's statement in Job 32:9 employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound message. The most prominent is Antithesis, where two contrasting ideas are juxtaposed to highlight a critical point: "great men" are contrasted with "wise," and "aged" are contrasted with "understand judgment." This creates a powerful rhetorical effect, emphasizing the disconnect between human assumptions about the source of wisdom and its actual, divine origin. The verse also functions as a Rhetorical Challenge, as Elihu directly confronts the prevailing cultural norms and the failed arguments of Job's friends. It is a bold, almost audacious claim from a younger man, designed to dismantle the intellectual authority of his elders and open the way for a new, divinely-centered perspective. Furthermore, the statement has the concise, declarative quality of a Proverbial Statement, even though it challenges conventional proverbs. It is presented as a universal truth, intended to reshape the audience's understanding of where true wisdom resides.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job 32:9 serves as a profound theological statement, asserting that true wisdom and understanding of divine judgment are not human achievements tied to status, longevity, or accumulated experience, but rather gifts from God. This challenges the self-sufficiency of human reason and highlights the inherent limitations of human perspective when attempting to comprehend the unfathomable ways of an infinite God. Elihu's words prepare the ground for a theology that emphasizes God's absolute sovereignty and the necessity of divine revelation for genuine insight. It underscores that spiritual discernment comes not from accumulated knowledge or worldly prestige, but from a humble openness to the Spirit of God, who alone grants understanding. This truth resonates throughout Scripture, consistently pointing to God as the ultimate source of all wisdom, accessible to those who seek Him in humility rather than relying on human credentials.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Job 32:9 offers timeless wisdom that challenges our contemporary assumptions about who possesses true insight and authority. In a world that often equates influence, wealth, academic degrees, or social media following with wisdom, Elihu's statement reminds us that genuine understanding, especially concerning matters of faith, morality, and the complexities of human suffering, transcends these superficial markers. It encourages us to cultivate a posture of profound humility, recognizing that even the most accomplished, experienced, or well-intentioned individuals are fallible and limited in their understanding. True discernment comes from a source beyond human limitations—from God Himself, through His Word and His Spirit. This verse calls us to be discerning listeners, evaluating counsel not by the speaker's status, age, or popularity, but by its alignment with biblical truth and the leading of the Holy Spirit. It impels us to prioritize seeking wisdom from God's Word and through prayer, understanding that He delights in revealing His truth to those who humbly seek it, regardless of their earthly standing or perceived intellectual capacity.

Questions for Reflection

  • What cultural assumptions about wisdom or authority do I tend to hold, and how might Job 32:9 challenge them in my own life?
  • How do I discern true wisdom in my own decision-making and in the counsel I receive from others, moving beyond superficial markers?
  • In what ways might my own age, experience, or lack thereof, hinder or help my pursuit of godly wisdom and spiritual understanding?
  • How does a posture of humility open the door for God to reveal His wisdom to me, regardless of my background or perceived status?

FAQ

Does Elihu's statement disrespect elders or people in authority?

Answer: Elihu's statement in Job 32:9 is not a blanket dismissal of elders or authority figures, nor is it an endorsement of disrespect. Instead, it's a profound theological corrective. In ancient cultures, age and status were almost automatically equated with wisdom, making Elihu's challenge quite audacious. He is not saying that no great men are wise or that no aged understand judgment. Rather, he asserts that wisdom and sound judgment are not inherent or guaranteed by age or position, but are gifts from God. He is critiquing a flawed premise—the assumption that human credentials automatically confer divine insight—not the individuals themselves. His point is that human experience and status, while valuable, are insufficient for understanding divine truth without the illuminating power of the Spirit of God, as he implies in Job 32:8. Therefore, it encourages discernment and humility, both in those who speak and those who listen, rather than blind deference based solely on human standing.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Job 32:9, with Elihu's audacious challenge to human wisdom and conventional authority, profoundly foreshadows the ultimate revelation of divine wisdom in Jesus Christ. Elihu's assertion that "great men are not wise" and "the aged do not understand judgment" finds its ultimate fulfillment in Christ, who, though rejected by the religious and political "great men" of His day, embodied the very wisdom of God. The world's wisdom often values power, status, and human achievement, but God's wisdom, as revealed in Christ, is often found in humility, sacrifice, and what appears to be weakness or foolishness to human eyes. The apostle Paul articulates this beautifully, declaring that Christ crucified is "a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God" (1 Corinthians 1:23-24). In Christ, "are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:3). He is the true "Word made flesh" (John 1:14), the embodiment of divine understanding that transcends all human categories of greatness or age. Elihu's statement thus prepares the way for a wisdom that is not earned or inherited, but freely given by God through His Son, Jesus, to all who humbly receive Him, regardless of their earthly standing, just as Jesus Himself praised God for hiding things from the wise and understanding and revealing them to little children (Matthew 11:25).

Copy as

Commentary on Job 32 verses 6–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Elihu here appears to have been,

I. A man of great modesty and humility. Though a young man, and a man of abilities, yet not pert, and confident, and assuming: his face shone, and, like Moses, he did not know it, which made it shine so much the brighter. Let it be observed by all, especially by young people, as worthy their imitation, 1. What a diffidence he had of himself and of his own judgment (Job 32:6): "I am young, and therefore I was afraid, and durst not show you my opinion, for fear I should either prove mistaken or do that which was unbecoming me." He was so observant of all that passed, and applied his mind so closely to what he heard, that he had formed in himself a judgment of it. He neither neglected it as foreign, nor declined it as intricate; but, how clear soever the matter was to himself, he was afraid to deliver his mind upon it, because he differed in his sentiments from those that were older than he. Note, It becomes us to be suspicious of our own judgment in matters of doubtful disputation, to be swift to hear the sentiments of others and slow to speak our own, especially when we go contrary to the judgment of those for whom, upon the score of their learning and piety, we justly have a veneration. 2. What a deference he paid to his seniors, and what great expectations he had from them, (Job 32:7): I said, Days should speak. Note, Age and experience give a man great advantage in judging of things, both as they furnish a man with so much the more matter for his thoughts to work upon and as they ripen and improve the facilities he is to work with, which is a good reason why old people should take pains both to learn themselves and to teach others (else the advantages of their age are a reproach to them), and why young people should attend on their instructions. It is a good lodging with an old disciple, Act 21:16; Tit 2:4. Elihu's modesty appeared in the patient attention he gave to what his seniors said, Job 32:11, Job 32:12. He waited for their words as one that expected much from them, agreeably to the opinion he had of these grave men. He gave ear to their reasons, that he might take their meaning, and fully understand what was the drift of their discourse and what the force of their arguments. He attended to them with diligence and care, and this, (1.) Though they were slow, and took up a great deal of time in searching out what to say. Though they had often to seek for matter and words, paused and hesitated, and were unready at their work, yet he overlooked that, and gave ear to their reasons, which, if really convincing, he would not think the less so for the disadvantages of the delivery of them. (2.) Though they trifled and made nothing of it, though none of them answered Job's words nor said what was proper to convince him, yet he attended to them, in hopes they would bring it to some head at last. We must often be willing to hear what we do not like, else we cannot prove all things. His patient attendance on their discourses he pleads, [1.] As that which entitled him to a liberty of speech in his turn and empowered him to require their attention. Hanc veniam petimusque damusque vicissim - This liberty we mutually allow and ask. Those that have heard may speak, and those that have learned may teach. [2.] As that which enabled him to pass a judgment upon what they had said. He had observed what they aimed at, and therefore knew what to say to it. Let us be thoroughly apprized of the sentiments of our brethren before we censure them; for he that answers a matter before he hears it, or when he has heard it only by halves, it is folly and shame to him, and bespeaks him both impertinent and imperious.

II. A man of great sense and courage, and one that knew as well when and how to speak as when and how to keep silence. Though he had so much respect to his friends as not to interrupt them with his speaking, yet he had so much regard to truth and justice (his better friends) as not to betray them by his silence. He boldly pleads,

1.That man is a rational creature, and therefore that every man has for himself a judgment of discretion and ought to be allowed a liberty of speech in his turn. He means the same that Job did (Job 12:3, But I have understanding as well as you) when he says (Job 32:8), But there is a spirit in man; only he expresses it a little more modestly, that one man has understanding as well as another, and no man can pretend to have the monopoly of reason or to engross all the trade of it. Had he meant I have revelation as well as you (as some understand it), he must have proved it; but, if he meant only I have reason as well as you, they cannot deny it, for it is every man's honour, and it is no presumption to claim it, nor could they gainsay his inference from it (Job 32:10): Therefore hearken to me. Learn here, (1.) That the soul is a spirit, neither material itself nor dependent upon matter, but capable of conversing with things spiritual, which are not the objects of sense. (2.) It is an understanding spirit. It is able to discover and receive truth, to discourse and reason upon it, and to direct and rule accordingly. (3.) This understanding spirit is in every man; it is the light that lighteth every man, Joh 1:9. (4.) It is the inspiration of the Almighty that gives us this understanding spirit; for he is the Father of spirits and fountain of understanding. See Gen 2:7; Ecc 12:7; Zac 12:1.

2.That those who are advanced above others in grandeur and gravity do not always proportionably go beyond them in knowledge and wisdom (Job 32:9): Great men are not always wise; it is a pity but they were, for then they would never do hurt with their greatness and would do so much the more good with their wisdom. Men should be preferred for their wisdom, and those that are in honour and power have most need of wisdom and have the greatest opportunity of improving in it; and yet it does not follow that great men are always wise, and therefore it is folly to subscribe to the dictates of any with an implicit faith. The aged do not always understand judgment; even they may be mistaken, and therefore must not expect to bring every thought into obedience to them: nay, therefore they must not take it as an affront to be contradicted, but rather take it as a kindness to be instructed, by their juniors: Therefore I said, hearken to me, Job 32:10. We must be willing to hear reason from those that are every way inferior to us, and to yield to it. He that has a good eye can see further upon level ground than he that is purblind can from the top of the highest mountain. Better is a poor and wise child then an old and foolish king, Ecc 4:13.

3.That it was requisite for something to be said, for the setting of this controversy in a true light, which, by all that had hitherto been said, was but rendered more intricate and perplexed (Job 32:13): "I must speak, lest you should say, We have found out wisdom, lest you should think your argument against Job conclusive and irrefragable, and that Job cannot be convinced and humbled by any other argument than this of yours, That God casteth him down and not man, that it appears by his extraordinary afflictions that God is his enemy, and therefore he is certainly a wicked man. I must show you that this is a false hypothesis and that Job may be convinced without maintaining it." Or, "Lest you should think you have found out the wisest way, to reason no more with him, but leave it to God to thrust him down." It is time to speak when we hear errors advanced and disputed for, especially under pretence of supporting the cause of God with them. It is time to speak when God's judgments are vouched for the patronizing of men's pride and passion and their unjust uncharitable censures of their brethren; then we must speak on God's behalf.

4.That he had something new to offer, and would endeavour to manage the dispute in a better manner than it had hitherto been managed, v. 14. He thinks he may expect a favourable hearing; for, (1.) He will not reply to Job's protestations of his integrity, but allows the truth of them, and therefore does not interpose as his enemy: "He hath not directed his words against me. I have nothing to say against the main scope of his discourse, nor do I differ from his principles. I have only a gentle reproof to give him for his passionate expressions." (2.) He will not repeat their arguments, nor go upon their principles: "Neither will I answer him with your speeches - not with the same matter, for should I only say what has been said I might justly be silenced as impertinent, - nor in the same manner; I will not be guilty of that peevishness towards him myself which I dislike in you." The controversy that has already been fully handled a wise man will let alone, unless he can amend and improve what has been done; why should he actum agere - do that which has been done already?

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Ishodad of MervAD 850
COMMENTARY ON JOB 32:8
The words “but truly it is the spirit in mortals,” [indicate] a rational soul. The words “the breath of the Almighty that makes them intelligent,” [indicate] that if we need to find a superior wisdom in human beings, we will recognize it in those who have received the virtue from God.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 32:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.