Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Or darkness, that thou canst not see; and abundance of waters cover thee.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Or darkness H2822, that thou canst not see H7200; and abundance H8229 of waters H4325 cover H3680 thee.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
or darkness , so that you can't see, and a flood of water that covers you up!
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
it is so dark you cannot see, and a flood of water covers you.
Ask
American Standard Version
Or darkness, so that thou canst not see, And abundance of waters cover thee.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
or darkness, so that you can not see, and floods of waters cover you.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Or darkenes that thou shouldest not see, and abundance of waters shall couer thee.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Or darkness--thou dost not see, And abundance of waters doth cover thee.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 22:11, delivered by Eliphaz the Temanite, functions as a severe accusation against Job, asserting that his profound suffering is a direct consequence of unconfessed sin. Eliphaz employs the vivid imagery of "darkness" and an "abundance of waters" to metaphorically depict the overwhelming calamity and spiritual obscurity that he believes has justly engulfed Job, reflecting a rigid and ultimately flawed retributive theology that struggles to account for the complexities of divine justice and human suffering.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Job 22:11 is situated within Eliphaz's third and most aggressive speech to Job, marking a significant escalation in the friends' accusations. Having failed to convince Job through general appeals to divine justice, Eliphaz now abandons subtlety, resorting to specific, though fabricated, charges of social injustice against Job, such as exploiting the poor and withholding aid from the needy, as detailed in Job 22:6-9. This particular verse, therefore, serves as Eliphaz's climactic summary of the perceived divine retribution that he believes has justly overtaken Job, directly linking Job's alleged wickedness to his current state of overwhelming suffering. It is a desperate attempt to break Job's resolve and compel a confession of guilt.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The narrative of Job is set in the ancient Near East, specifically the land of Uz, and reflects the societal and theological norms of a patriarchal culture. The dominant wisdom tradition of this era, which Eliphaz and his companions represent, largely adhered to a strict doctrine of divine retribution: righteousness was believed to invariably lead to prosperity and blessing, while wickedness inevitably resulted in suffering and misfortune. This framework, while containing a kernel of truth about God's justice, proved inadequate in explaining the suffering of the innocent. Within this cultural milieu, an individual experiencing the profound loss and affliction that Job endured was automatically presumed guilty of grave sin, as divine justice was widely believed to be immediate, visible, and perfectly balanced. The powerful imagery of "darkness" and "floods" was a common motif in ancient Semitic literature, frequently used to symbolize chaos, divine judgment, overwhelming calamity, and the forces of destruction, often drawing on primal fears associated with the pre-creation chaos and devastating floods.
  • Key Themes: Job 22:11 significantly contributes to several overarching themes explored throughout the book of Job. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the misguided nature of retributive theology as rigidly espoused by Job's friends. Eliphaz's assertion that Job's suffering is a direct, punitive consequence of his sin is the central theological error that the book ultimately refutes, culminating in God's rebuke of the friends for not speaking what is right about Him (Job 42:7). Secondly, the verse underscores the theme of divine mystery and human limitation in comprehending God's intricate ways. Eliphaz's simplistic explanation utterly fails to grasp the deeper, often inscrutable purposes behind suffering, a core lesson woven throughout the entire narrative, especially illuminated by God's profound speeches from the whirlwind in Job 38-41. Finally, the potent imagery of "darkness" and "waters" vividly reinforces the theme of overwhelming suffering and despair, portraying Job's experience of profound physical, emotional, and spiritual distress, even if Eliphaz fundamentally misattributes its cause.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Darkness (Hebrew, chôshek', H2822): This term signifies more than merely the absence of light. According to the ground truth data, it denotes "misery, destruction, death, ignorance, sorrow, wickedness," and "obscurity." In Eliphaz's accusation, "darkness" suggests not only a literal inability to see (perhaps due to Job's physical affliction or the overwhelming nature of his circumstances) but also a profound spiritual obscurity or blindness, an inability to perceive divine favor or a path to restoration. It implies a state of being lost, without guidance or hope, under the perceived cloud of God's judgment.
  • See (Hebrew, râʼâh', H7200): This primitive root means "to see, literally or figuratively." Its applications include "discern," "perceive," "regard," and "have respect." In the context of Job 22:11, the inability to "see" (thou canst not see) implies a profound lack of perception or understanding on Job's part. Eliphaz suggests Job is blind to his own alleged sin, to God's justice in his suffering, or to the path of repentance that Eliphaz believes would lead to his restoration. This inability to "see" is presented as a direct consequence of the "darkness" that has enveloped him.
  • Cover (Hebrew, kâçâh', H3680): This primitive root means "to plump, i.e. fill up hollows; by implication, to cover (for clothing or secrecy); clad self, close, clothe, conceal, hide, overwhelm." In this verse, the waters "cover" Job, indicating an overwhelming and engulfing action. Eliphaz uses this verb to convey the idea that Job is completely submerged or overwhelmed by a deluge of troubles, a torrent of misfortune that has entirely consumed him, leaving him helpless and without escape, again, as a sign of divine judgment.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Or darkness, [that] thou canst not see;": This initial clause presents the first dimension of Eliphaz's accusation, portraying Job's condition. The "darkness" here is not merely a physical absence of light but a profound metaphor for the spiritual and existential obscurity that Eliphaz believes has enveloped Job. It suggests a state where Job is unable to discern truth, perceive God's presence or favor, or find a way forward out of his suffering. The subsequent inability to "see" implies a profound blindness—perhaps to his own alleged sin, or to the path of repentance and restoration that Eliphaz believes is available to him. This condition is presented by Eliphaz as a direct and just consequence of Job's hidden iniquity.
  • "and abundance of waters cover thee.": This second clause powerfully amplifies the first, introducing a vivid metaphor of overwhelming calamity. The "abundance of waters" signifies a deluge of troubles, a flood of adversity that has completely submerged Job. This potent imagery evokes a sense of being drowned, overwhelmed, and utterly helpless against a force that has consumed him. Eliphaz intends this to be a vivid depiction of divine judgment, where Job's alleged sins have led to an inescapable torrent of misfortune that has "covered" him, leaving him without refuge, hope, or escape from the perceived divine wrath.

Literary Devices

Eliphaz's declaration in Job 22:11 is rich in Imagery and Metaphor. The "darkness" and "abundance of waters" are not literal descriptions of Job's physical state but powerful figurative representations of his suffering. Darkness serves as a metaphor for spiritual blindness, despair, and the absence of divine favor, while the abundance of waters is a metaphor for overwhelming calamity, chaos, and the feeling of being submerged by misfortune. These metaphors are expertly employed to create a vivid and distressing picture of Job's distress, intensifying the accusation that his suffering is a just punishment. The verse also employs a form of Parallelism, where the two clauses, though distinct in their specific imagery, both serve to describe the comprehensive and overwhelming nature of Job's perceived divine judgment. The language is also somewhat Hyperbolic, exaggerating the extent of Job's affliction to emphasize Eliphaz's rigid point about the severity of Job's supposed sin and its devastating consequences.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job 22:11, though stemming from a flawed theological premise, profoundly engages with themes of suffering, divine justice, and human perception. Eliphaz's interpretation of Job's "darkness" and "overwhelming waters" as punitive judgment highlights a pervasive human tendency to attribute suffering solely to sin, a simplistic view the book of Job ultimately and emphatically refutes. While sin undeniably brings consequences, this verse serves as a dramatic example of how a rigid, legalistic understanding of God's justice can lead to false accusations, a lack of empathy, and a misrepresentation of God's character. The book of Job challenges us to look beyond immediate cause-and-effect explanations for suffering, inviting us instead into the profound mystery of God's sovereignty and the multifaceted nature of human experience. It underscores that God's ways are often beyond human comprehension, and suffering can serve purposes far deeper than simple retribution.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Job 22:11, despite its origin in Eliphaz's faulty theology, prompts us to reflect deeply on our own responses to suffering, both in our lives and in the lives of others. It serves as a powerful reminder against the temptation to offer simplistic, judgmental explanations for complex human pain. Just as Eliphaz wrongly assumed Job's hidden sin, we too can fall into the trap of spiritualizing or moralizing suffering, failing to offer genuine compassion and understanding. The verse challenges us to cultivate empathy, humility, and a willingness to sit with mystery rather than rushing to judgment. It encourages us to trust in God's ultimate goodness and justice, even when His ways are inscrutable, and to remember that not all suffering is a direct punishment for specific sin. Our role, as followers of Christ, is to be agents of comfort and grace, reflecting the heart of God who understands and enters into human suffering, rather than standing aloof in judgment. We are called to bear one another's burdens, not to add to them with unfounded accusations.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically react when I see others experiencing profound suffering? Am I quick to judge or to offer comfort and empathy?
  • What are some common misconceptions about suffering that I might hold or have encountered in my community or personal theology?
  • In what ways can I offer true, empathetic support to those in "darkness" or "overwhelming waters," without resorting to simplistic theological answers?
  • How does the broader narrative of Job challenge my own understanding of divine justice and the multifaceted purposes of suffering in a believer's life?

FAQ

Does Job 22:11 mean that all suffering is a punishment for sin?

Answer: No, not according to the overall message and theological resolution of the book of Job. While Eliphaz and Job's other friends argue that Job's "darkness" and "abundance of waters" are direct punishments for hidden sins, the book of Job ultimately refutes this simplistic, retributive theology. God Himself rebukes Eliphaz and his friends in Job 42:7 for not speaking what is right about Him, unlike Job. The book demonstrates that suffering can occur for reasons other than direct punishment for sin, such as testing of faith, refining of character, or for God's sovereign purposes that are beyond human comprehension. Job 22:11 represents a human, flawed interpretation of suffering, not a divine truth revealed by God.

What does "darkness" and "abundance of waters" symbolize in this verse?

Answer: In Job 22:11, "darkness" (Hebrew: chôshek) symbolizes spiritual obscurity, deep despair, distress, and an inability to perceive God's presence, His favor, or a way forward. It suggests a state of being lost and overwhelmed, both physically by circumstances and spiritually by a perceived abandonment from God. "Abundance of waters" (Hebrew: shiphʻâh mayim) is a powerful metaphor for overwhelming calamity, a flood of troubles, or a perilous situation from which there seems no escape. Both images together vividly convey the profound, consuming nature of Job's suffering as interpreted by Eliphaz. This imagery is common in biblical literature to describe deep distress, chaos, and judgment, as seen in Psalm 69:1-2.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Job 22:11 originates from a false accusation and flawed theology, its powerful imagery of overwhelming darkness and consuming waters finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. Jesus Christ is the ultimate answer to the "darkness" of sin, despair, and spiritual blindness that covers humanity. He is the "light of the world" who came to dispel this spiritual obscurity, declaring, "Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life" (John 8:12). Just as Job was unjustly accused and overwhelmed by suffering for reasons unknown to his friends, Christ, the innocent Lamb of God, bore the full "abundance of waters"—the deluge of God's righteous wrath against sin—on the cross. His cry of dereliction, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:46), echoes the profound darkness and sense of abandonment that Job experienced. However, unlike Job's friends who misdiagnosed his suffering, Christ's suffering was redemptive, not punitive for His own sin. He willingly entered into the depths of human suffering and death, conquering the chaos and darkness, so that those who believe in Him might never be covered by the waters of judgment but find eternal life and light (John 3:16). Through His glorious resurrection, He emerged victorious from the grave, demonstrating His triumph over all darkness and overwhelming forces, offering true peace and restoration where human wisdom, like Eliphaz's, utterly fails.

Copy as

Commentary on Job 22 verses 5–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Eliphaz and his companions had condemned Job, in general, as a wicked man and a hypocrite; but none of them had descended to particulars, nor drawn up any articles of impeachment against him, until Eliphaz did so here, where he positively and expressly charges him with many high crimes and misdemeanours, which, if he had really been guilty of them, might well have justified them in their harsh censures of him. "Come," says Eliphaz, "we have been too long beating about the bush, too tender of Job and afraid of grieving him, which has but confirmed him in his self-justification. It is high time to deal plainly with him. We have condemned him by parables, but that does not answer the end; he is not prevailed with to condemn himself. We must therefore plainly tell him, Thou art the man, the tyrant, the oppressor, the atheist, we have been speaking of all this while. Is not thy wickedness great? Certainly it is, or else thy troubles would not be so great. I appeal to thyself, and thy own conscience; are not thy iniquities infinite, both in number and heinousness?" Strictly taken, nothing is infinite but God; but he means this, that his sins were more than could be counted and more heinous than could be conceived. Sin, being committed against Infinite Majesty, has in it a kind of infinite malignity. But when Eliphaz charges Job thus highly, and ventures to descend to particulars too, laying to his charge that which he knew not, we may take occasion hence, 1. To be angry at those who unjustly censure and condemn their brethren. For aught I know, Eliphaz, in accusing Job falsely, as he does here, was guilty of as great a sin and as great a wrong to Job as the Sabeans and Chaldeans that robbed him; for a man's good name is more precious and valuable than his wealth. It is against all the laws of justice, charity, and friendship, either to raise or receive calumnies, jealousies, and evil surmises, concerning others; and it is the more base and disingenuous if we thus vex those that are in distress and add to their affliction. Eliphaz could produce no instances of Job's guilt in any of the particulars that follow here, but seems resolved to calumniate boldly, and throw all the reproach he could on Job, not doubting but that some would cleave to him. 2. To pity those who are thus censured and condemned. Innocency itself will be no security against a false and foul tongue. Job, whom God himself praised as the best man in the world, is here represented by one of his friends, and he a wise and good man too, as one of the greatest villains in nature. Let us not think it strange if at any time we be thus blackened, but learn how to pass by evil report as well as good, and commit our cause, as Job did his, to him that judgeth righteously.

Let us see the particular articles of this charge.

I. He charged him with oppression and injustice, that, when he was in prosperity, he not only did no good with his wealth and power, but did a great deal of hurt with them. This was utterly false, as appears by the account Job gives of himself (Job 29:12, etc.) and the character God gave of him, ch. 1. And yet,

1.Eliphaz branches out this charge into divers particulars, with as much assurance as if he could call witnesses to prove upon oath every article of it. He tells him, (1.) That he had been cruel and unmerciful to the poor. As a magistrate he ought to have protected them and seen them provided for; but Eliphaz suspects that he never did them any kindness, but all the mischief his power enabled him to do, - that, for an inconsiderable debt, he demanded, and carried away by violence, a pawn of great value, even from his brother, whose honesty and sufficiency he could not but know (Job 22:6), Thou hast taken a pledge from thy brother for nought, or, as the Septuagint reads it, Thou hast taken thy brethren for pledges, and that for nought, imprisoned them, enslaved them, because they had nothing to pay, - that he had taken the very clothes of his insolvent tenants and debtors, so that he had stripped them naked, and left them so (the law of Moses forbade this, Exo 22:26, Deu 24:13), - he had not been charitable to the poor, no, not to poor travellers, and poor widows: "Thou hast not given so much as a cup of cold water (which would have cost thee nothing) to the weary to drink, when he begged for it (Job 22:7) and was ready to perish for want of it, nay, thou hast withholden bread from the hungry in their extremity, hast not only not given it, but hast forbidden the giving of it, which is withholding good from those to whom it is really due, Pro 3:27. Poor widows, who while their husbands were living troubled nobody, but now were forced to seek relief, thou hast sent away empty from thy doors with a sad heart, Job 22:9. Those who came to thee for justice, thou didst send away unheard, unhelped; nay, though they came to thee full, thou didst squeeze them, and send them away empty; and, worst of all, the arms of the fatherless have been broken; those that could help themselves but little thou hast quite disabled to help themselves." This which is the blackest part of the charge, is but insinuated: The arms of the fatherless have been broken. He does not say, "Thou has broken them," but he would have it understood so, and if they be broken, and those who have power do not relieve them, they are chargeable with it. "They have been broken by those under thee, and thou hast connived at it, which brings thee under the guilt." (2.) That he had been partial to the rich and great (Job 22:8): "As for the mighty man, if he was guilty of any crime, he was never questioned for it: he had the earth; he dwelt in it. If he brought an action ever so unjustly, or if an action were ever so justly brought against him, yet he was sure to carry his cause in thy courts. The poor were not fed at thy door, while the rich were feasted at thy table." Contrary to this is Christ's rule for hospitality (Luk 14:12-14); and Solomon says, He that gives to the rich shall come to poverty.

2.He attributes all his present troubles to these supposed sins (Job 22:10, Job 22:11): "Those that are guilty of such practices as these commonly bring themselves into just such a condition as thou art now in; and therefore we conclude thou hast been thus guilty." (1.) "The providence of God usually crosses and embarrasses such; and snares are, accordingly, round about thee, so that, which way soever thou steppest or lookest, thou findest thyself in distress; and others are as hard upon thee as thou hast been upon the poor." (2.) "Their consciences may be expected to terrify and accuse them. No sin makes a louder cry there than unmercifulness; and, accordingly, sudden fear troubles thee; and, though thou wilt not own it, it is guilt of this kind that creates thee all this terror." Zophar had insinuated this, Job 20:19, Job 20:20. (3.) "They are brought to their wits' end, so amazed and bewildered that they know not what to do, and that also is thy case; for thou art in darkness that thou canst not see wherefore God contends with thee nor what is the best course for thee to take, for abundance of waters cover thee," that is, "thou art in a mist, in the midst of dark waters, in the thick clouds of the sky." Note, Those that have not shown mercy may justly be denied the comfortable hope that they shall find mercy; and then what can they expect but snares, and darkness, and continual fear?

II. He charged him with atheism, infidelity, and gross impiety, and thought this was at the bottom of his injustice and oppressiveness: he that did not fear God did not regard man. He would have it thought that Job was an Epicurean, who did indeed own the being of God, but denied his providence, and fancied that he confined himself to the entertainments of the upper world and never concerned himself in the inhabitants and affairs of this.

1.Eliphaz referred to an important truth, which he thought, if Job had duly considered it, would have prevented him from being so passionate in his complaints and bold in justifying himself (Job 22:12): Is not God in the height of heaven? Yes, no doubt he is. No heaven so high but God is there; and in the highest heavens, the heavens of the blessed, the residence of his glory, he is present in a special manner. There he is pleased to manifest himself in a way peculiar to the upper world, and thence he is pleased to manifest himself in a way suited to this lower world. There is his throne; there is his court: he is called the Heavens, Dan 4:26. Thus Eliphaz proves that a man cannot be profitable to God (Job 22:2), that he ought not to contend with God (it is his folly if he does), and that we ought always to address ourselves to God with very great reverence; for when we behold the height of the stars, how high they are, we should, at the same time, also consider the transcendent majesty of God, who is above the stars, and how high he is.

2.He charged it upon Job that he made a bad use of this doctrine, which he might have made so good a use of, Job 22:13. "This is holding the truth in unrighteousness, fighting against religion with its own weapons, and turning its own artillery upon itself: thou art willing to own that God is in the height of heaven but thence thou inferrest, How doth God know?" Bad men expel the fear of God out of their hearts by banishing the eye of God out of the world (Eze 8:12), and care not what they do if they can but persuade themselves that God does not know. Eliphaz suspected that Job had such a notion of God as this, that, because he is in the height of heaven, (1.) It is therefore impossible for him to see and hear what is done at so great a distance as this earth, especially since there is a dark cloud (Job 22:13), many thick clouds (Job 22:14), that come between him and us, and are a covering to him, so that he cannot see, much less can he judge of, the affairs of this lower world; as if God had eyes of flesh, Job 10:4. The interposing firmament is to him as transparent crystal, Eze 1:22. Distance of place creates no difficulty to him who fills immensity, any more than distance of time to him who is eternal. Or, (2.) That it is therefore below him, and a diminution to his glory, to take cognizance of this inferior part of the creation: He walks in the circuit of heaven, and has enough to do to enjoy himself and his own perfections and glory in that bright and quiet world; why should he trouble himself about us? This is gross absurdity, as well as gross impiety, which Eliphaz here fathers upon Job; for it supposes that the administration of government is a burden and disparagement to the supreme governor and that the acts of justice and mercy are a toil to a mind infinitely wise, holy, and good. If the sun, a creature, and inanimate, can with his light and influence reach this earth, and every part of it (Psa 19:6), even from that vast height of the visible heavens in which he is, and in the circuit of which he walks, and that through many a thick and dark cloud, shall we question it concerning the Creator?

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Julian of EclanumAD 455
EXPOSITION ON THE BOOK OF JOB 22:10-11
Since [Eliphaz] had said that [Job] had sinned not mildly or, so to speak, with feeble strength but greatly and with much force, he now fervently invokes revenge against him, so that it may appear that the crime and the revenge are weighed for him at the same time. “And a sudden terror overwhelms you.” Another version of the text reads, “a sudden force.”“And you thought that you would have not seen the darkness.” You also added this crime to your iniquities—the fact that you believed that revenge would have not followed. If you had thought about it, it would have turned you from the dangerous ways of your actions or frightened you less by being already foreseen.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
As if he said in plain speech; ‘Thou didst promise thyself security of peace in hope, and therefore thou wast glad for thine assurance as for the light, nor ever thoughtest for thyself to be oppressed with tribulation. But see, whilst thou art afflicted with evils coming upon thee, whether what thou maintainest be right, the very darkness of trouble which weighs upon thee makes plain; which same troubles Eliphaz compares to ‘overflowing waters,’ in that whilst one set rushes in over another, as in swoln waters waves follow waves..
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 22:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.