Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Are the consolations of God small with thee? is there any secret thing with thee?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Are the consolations H8575 of God H410 small H4592 with thee? is there any secret H328 thing H1697 with thee?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Are the comfortings of God not enough for you, or a word that deals gently with you?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Are the consolations of God not enough for you, even words spoken gently to you?
Ask
American Standard Version
Are the consolations of God too small for thee, Even the word that is gentle toward thee?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Are the consolations of God too small for you, even the word that is gentle toward you?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Seeme the consolations of God small vnto thee? is this thing strange vnto thee?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Too few for thee are the comforts of God? And a gentle word is with thee,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 15:11 presents Eliphaz the Temanite's escalating accusation against Job during his second speech, challenging Job's spiritual integrity and implying that his prolonged suffering stems from unconfessed sin. Through a pair of pointed rhetorical questions, Eliphaz interrogates Job's apparent disregard for God's divine comfort and insinuates the presence of a "secret thing" – a hidden transgression – preventing his restoration, thereby reflecting the friends' rigid adherence to a simplistic retribution theology.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Job 15:11 is situated within Eliphaz's second and more aggressive speech (Job 15:1-35), which marks a significant shift from his somewhat milder tone in Job 4. This verse follows Job's despairing lament in Job 14, where Job expresses his longing for death and questions God's treatment of him. Eliphaz, rather than offering comfort, directly confronts Job, accusing him of arrogance, impiety, and rejecting divine wisdom. The preceding verses in Job 15 describe the fate of the wicked, implicitly painting Job with the same brush, intensifying the psychological and spiritual pressure on him. The rhetorical questions of verse 11 serve as a direct challenge to Job's self-proclaimed righteousness and his complaints against God, aiming to force a confession.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, a deeply ingrained theological framework known as "retribution theology" dominated the understanding of divine justice. This paradigm posited a direct, observable correlation: righteousness led to prosperity and blessing, while wickedness inevitably resulted in suffering and calamity. From this perspective, Job's catastrophic losses and physical affliction were irrefutable proof of significant, unconfessed sin. The friends, including Eliphaz, operated entirely within this worldview, making it impossible for them to conceive of innocent suffering. Their counsel, though perhaps well-intentioned, was rooted in a cultural expectation that God would always administer justice in this life, rewarding the good and punishing the evil. The concept of "secret sin" was particularly potent, as unconfessed wrongdoing was believed to hinder divine favor and could even bring communal judgment.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several central themes within the Book of Job. Foremost, it highlights the misunderstanding of suffering that permeates the counsel of Job's friends, who rigidly apply a simplistic retribution theology. They are unable to fathom suffering apart from sin, a premise that the book ultimately challenges and refutes. Secondly, the verse introduces the theme of divine comfort – or rather, Eliphaz's accusation that Job is rejecting it. Eliphaz implies that God's "consolations" are readily available, perhaps even through the friends' presence and counsel, but Job is too proud or stubborn to receive them. This stands in stark contrast to the biblical truth that God Himself is the ultimate source of all comfort, as affirmed in 2 Corinthians 1:3-4. Lastly, the verse directly introduces the theme of hidden sin, as Eliphaz directly accuses Job of concealing some transgression. This accusation becomes a central point of contention throughout the dialogue, with Job consistently maintaining his integrity and innocence, as he passionately declares in Job 27:6.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Consolations (Hebrew, tanchûwm', H8575): Derived from the root nâcham, this word signifies compassion, solace, and comfort. When Eliphaz asks, "Are the consolations of God small with thee?", he is referring to the comfort, wisdom, and perhaps even the chastening that God offers. Eliphaz implies that God's provisions for solace are abundant and available, and Job's perceived lack of peace or continued distress is due to his own rejection or undervaluation of them.
  • God (Hebrew, ʼêl', H410): Shortened from ʼayil, this term denotes strength and might, specifically referring to the Almighty, though it can also be used for any deity. In this context, it refers to the one true God, Yahweh, whose "consolations" Eliphaz claims Job is despising. The use of this powerful divine name underscores the gravity of Eliphaz's accusation: Job is not merely rejecting human comfort but the very solace offered by the omnipotent Creator.
  • Secret (Hebrew, ʼaṭ', H328): From an unused root perhaps meaning "to move softly," this word can refer to a necromancer (from their soft incantations) or, as an adverb, "gently" or "softly." In this context, combined with "thing" (dabar), it strongly implies something hidden, clandestine, or concealed, particularly a hidden transgression or unconfessed fault. Eliphaz is suggesting that Job is deliberately keeping a wrongdoing hidden from God and his friends.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Are the consolations of God small with thee?": This is a direct rhetorical question, functioning as an accusation rather than a genuine inquiry. Eliphaz implies that Job is either ungrateful for, or dismissive of, the comfort, wisdom, and perhaps even the corrective discipline that God provides. He suggests that Job's suffering is not due to a lack of divine solace but to Job's own perception or rejection of it. Eliphaz likely views his own counsel and the friends' presence as part of these "consolations," which Job has vehemently rejected. The question challenges Job's spiritual perception and humility, hinting at a hardened heart.
  • "is there any secret thing with thee?": This second rhetorical question is a pointed and damning accusation. Eliphaz suggests that Job is deliberately concealing some unconfessed sin, hidden iniquity, or a clandestine act. In the friends' rigid theological framework, such a "secret thing" would be the sole logical explanation for Job's immense and prolonged suffering. This question is designed to corner Job, forcing him to either admit guilt or further expose his perceived stubbornness, pride, and hypocrisy. It reflects their unwavering conviction that Job must be guilty of something significant, even if it is not outwardly apparent.

Literary Devices

Job 15:11 is rich with literary devices that amplify Eliphaz's accusatory tone. The most prominent device is Rhetorical Question, employed twice in rapid succession. These are not genuine inquiries but rather statements disguised as questions, designed to convey Eliphaz's firm accusations and assumptions about Job's character and spiritual state. The use of rhetorical questions creates a confrontational and interrogative atmosphere, immediately putting Job on the defensive. Underlying these questions is powerful Implication: Eliphaz implies that Job is arrogant, ungrateful for divine comfort, and guilty of hidden sin, all without directly stating these accusations as facts. This indirect approach allows Eliphaz to maintain a veneer of compassionate counsel while subtly delivering harsh judgments. Furthermore, there is a strong element of Irony in Eliphaz's words. He speaks of "consolations of God" while simultaneously delivering deeply un-consoling and accusatory remarks, thereby demonstrating the profound gap between his intended "comfort" and the actual pain and distress he inflicts upon Job.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job 15:11 serves as a profound theological warning against the dangers of simplistic frameworks that reduce divine justice to a direct, observable cause-and-effect relationship between sin and suffering. Eliphaz's accusations, though perhaps rooted in a genuine desire to understand God's ways and help his friend, ultimately misrepresent God's multifaceted character and deepen Job's anguish. The verse highlights the pervasive human tendency to judge others' suffering through the narrow lens of presumed hidden sin, rather than embracing the mystery of God's sovereignty, the multifaceted nature of trials, and the reality of innocent suffering. The true "consolations of God" are indeed profound and ever-present, but they are often found not in human accusations or simplistic explanations, but in God's unwavering presence, His sustaining grace, and His ultimate vindication of the righteous, even amidst inexplicable pain.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Eliphaz's words in Job 15:11 challenge us to deeply examine our own responses to suffering, both in ourselves and in others. When we face trials and God's comfort doesn't manifest in the immediate, tangible ways we expect or desire, do we perceive His consolations as "small" or insufficient? Are we quick to assume a "secret thing" – a hidden sin or fault – in our own lives or in the lives of others when confronted with inexplicable hardship or prolonged pain? This verse calls us to cultivate a profound and resilient trust in God's wisdom and goodness, even when His ways are beyond our comprehension, as articulated in Isaiah 55:8-9. It also serves as a potent warning against self-righteous judgment and the immense harm caused by offering simplistic, accusatory "comfort" to those in deep pain. True comfort comes from empathy, compassionate presence, and faithfully pointing to God's unchanging character and boundless grace, not from theological pronouncements that lack genuine love and understanding. We are called to be channels of God's comfort, not accusers, remembering that God's comfort is boundless, even when our human understanding is severely limited.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically respond when God's comfort doesn't manifest in the way I expect or desire during times of suffering?
  • In what ways might I be tempted to attribute others' suffering to "secret sins" rather than seeking to offer compassionate support and empathy?
  • What does it mean to truly receive and value the "consolations of God" when life is difficult, even when answers are elusive and pain persists?

FAQ

Why did Eliphaz believe Job was hiding a "secret thing"?

Answer: Eliphaz, along with Job's other friends, adhered to a strict retribution theology, which taught that God directly rewards the righteous with prosperity and punishes the wicked with suffering. From their perspective, Job's immense and prolonged suffering could only be explained by significant sin. Since Job vehemently denied any overt wrongdoing and maintained his integrity, Eliphaz concluded that Job must be concealing some "secret thing"—an unconfessed transgression or hidden iniquity—that was preventing God from restoring him. This belief system left no room for innocent suffering, compelling them to find a sin to explain Job's plight, even if it was hidden.

What are the "consolations of God" that Eliphaz refers to?

Answer: The "consolations of God" (Hebrew: tanchûwm) refer to the comfort, solace, wisdom, and even the corrective discipline that God provides to His people. Eliphaz likely believed that God was offering Job comfort through the very counsel of his friends, or perhaps through the refining process of suffering itself, which he saw as a means to bring Job to repentance. He implies that Job is either ungrateful for, or dismissive of, these divine provisions for peace and restoration. The profound irony is that Eliphaz's words, intended as comfort, were deeply accusatory and caused Job more distress, highlighting the vast difference between human "consolations" based on flawed theology and true divine comfort, which is often found in God's abiding presence and grace, as beautifully described in Psalm 23:4.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Eliphaz's accusations in Job 15:11 tragically misrepresent God's character and Job's integrity, they inadvertently point to profound truths that find their ultimate fulfillment in Christ. Eliphaz's question about "the consolations of God" finds its complete and perfect answer in Jesus, who is the God of all comfort made manifest in human flesh. Unlike the friends' harsh and conditional comfort, Christ offers unconditional solace and peace, truly bearing our sorrows and griefs (as prophesied in Isaiah 53:4). Furthermore, Eliphaz's accusation of a "secret thing" highlights humanity's universal struggle with hidden sin and the desperate need for a perfect mediator. While Job was innocent of the specific sins his friends accused him of, all humanity carries the burden of sin, both known and unknown. Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, perfectly reveals all hidden things and offers complete forgiveness and cleansing through His atoning sacrifice. Through Him, no "secret thing" can ultimately separate those who trust in Him from God's boundless love and grace, for in Christ, we are fully reconciled and eternally secure (Romans 8:38-39). He is the true source of divine consolation, not through accusation, but through redemptive sacrifice and His abiding, compassionate presence.

Copy as

Commentary on Job 15 verses 1–16

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Eliphaz here falls very foul upon Job, because he contradicted what he and his colleagues had said, and did not acquiesce in it and applaud it, as they expected. Proud people are apt thus to take it very much amiss if they may not have leave to dictate and give law to all about them, and to censure those as ignorant and obstinate, and all that is naught, who cannot in every thing say as they say. Several great crimes Eliphaz here charges Job with, only because he would not own himself a hypocrite.

I. He charges him with folly and absurdity (Job 15:2, Job 15:3), that, whereas he had been reputed a wise man, he had now quite forfeited his reputation; any one would say that his wisdom had departed from him, he talked so extravagantly and so little to the purpose. Bildad began thus (Job 8:2), and Zophar, Job 11:2, Job 11:3. It is common for angry disputants thus to represent one another's reasonings as impertinent and ridiculous more than there is cause, forgetting the doom of him that calls his brother Raca, and Thou fool. It is true, 1. That there is in the world a great deal of vain knowledge, science falsely so called, that is useless, and therefore worthless. 2. That this is the knowledge that puffs up, with which men swell in a fond conceit of their own accomplishments. 3. That, whatever vain knowledge a man may have in his head, if he would be thought a wise man he must not utter it, but let it die with himself as it deserves. 4. Unprofitable talk is evil talk. We must give an account in the great day not only for wicked words, but for idle words. Speeches therefore which do no good, which do no service either to God or our neighbour, or no justice to ourselves, which are no way to the use of edifying, were better unspoken. Those words which are as wind, light and empty, especially which are as the east wind, hurtful and pernicious, it will be pernicious to fill either ourselves or others with, for they will pass very ill in the account. 5. Vain knowledge or unprofitable talk ought to be reproved and checked, especially in a wise man, whom it worst becomes and who does most hurt by the bad example of it.

II. He charges him with impiety and irreligion (Job 15:4): "Thou castest off fear," that is, "the fear of God, and that regard to him which thou shouldst have; and then thou restrainest prayer." See what religion is summed up in, fearing God and praying to him, the former the most needful principle, the latter the most needful practice. Where no fear of God is no good is to be expected; and those who live without prayer certainly live without God in the world. Those who restrain prayer do thereby give evidence that they cast off fear. Surely those have no reverence of God's majesty, no dread of his wrath, and are in no care about their souls and eternity, who make no applications to God for his grace. Those who are prayerless are fearless and graceless. When the fear of God is cast off all sin is let in and a door opened to all manner of profaneness. It is especially bad with those who have had some fear of God, but have now cast it off - have been frequent in prayer, but now restrain it. How have they fallen! How is their first love lost! It denotes a kind of force put upon themselves. The fear of God would cleave to them, but they throw it off; prayer would be uttered, but they restrain it; and, in both, they baffle their convictions. Those who either omit prayer or straiten and abridge themselves in it, quenching the spirit of adoption and denying themselves the liberty they might take in the duty, restrain prayer. This is bad enough, but it is worse to restrain others from prayer, to prohibit and discourage prayer, as Darius, Dan 6:7. Now,

1.Eliphaz charges this upon Job, either, (1.) As that which was his own practice. He thought that Job talked of God with such liberty as if he had been his equal, and that he charged him so vehemently with hard usage of him, and challenged him so often to a fair trial, that he had quite thrown off all religious regard to him. This charge was utterly false, and yet wanted not some colour. We ought not only to take care that we keep up prayer and the fear of God, but that we never drop any unwary expressions which may give occasion to those who seek occasion to question our sincerity and constancy in religion. Or, (2.) As that which others would infer from the doctrine he maintained. "If this be true" (thinks Eliphaz) "which Job says, that a man may be thus sorely afflicted and yet be a good man, then farewell all religion, farewell prayer and the fear of God. If all things come alike to all, and the best men may have the worst treatment in this world, every one will be ready to say, It is vain to serve God; and what profit is it to keep his ordinances? Mal 3:14. Verily I have cleansed my hands in vain, Psa 73:13, Psa 73:14. Who will be honest if the tabernacles of robbers prosper? Job 12:6. If there be no forgiveness with God (Job 7:21), who will fear him? Psa 130:4. If he laugh at the trial of the innocent (Job 9:23), if he be so difficult of access (Job 9:32), who will pray to him?" Note, It is a piece of injustice which even wise and good men are too often guilty of, in the heat of disputation, to charge upon their adversaries those consequences of their opinions which are not fairly drawn from them and which really they abhor. This is not doing as we would be done by.

2.Upon this strained innuendo Eliphaz grounds that high charge of impiety (Job 15:5): Thy mouth utters thy iniquity - teaches it, so the word is. "Thou teachest others to have the same hard thoughts of God and religion that thou thyself hast." It is bad to break even the least of the commandments, but worse to teach men so, Mat 5:19. If we ever thought evil, let us lay our hand upon our mouth to suppress the evil thought (Pro 30:32), and let us by no means utter it; that is putting an imprimatur to it, publishing it with allowance, to the dishonour of God and the damage of others. Observe, When men have cast off fear and prayer their mouths utter iniquity. Those that cease to do good soon learn to do evil. What can we expect but all manner of iniquity from those that arm not themselves with the grace of God against it? But thou choosest the tongue of the crafty, that is, "Thou utterest thy iniquity with some show and pretence of piety, mixing some good words with the bad, as tradesmen do with their wares to help them off." The mouth of iniquity could not do so much mischief as it does without the tongue of the crafty. The serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety. See Rom 16:18. The tongue of the crafty speaks with design and deliberation; and therefore those that use it may be said to choose it, as that which will serve their purpose better than the tongue of the upright: but it will be found, at last, that honesty is the best policy. Eliphaz, in his first discourse, had proceeded against Job upon mere surmise (Job 4:6, Job 4:7), but now he has got proof against him from his own discourses (Job 15:6): Thy own mouth condemns thee, and not I. But he should have considered that he and his fellows had provoked him to say that which now they took advantage of; and that was not fair. Those are most effectually condemned that are condemned by themselves, Tit 3:11; Luk 19:22. Many a man needs no more to sink him than for his own tongue to fall upon him.

III. He charges him with intolerable arrogancy and self-conceitedness. It was a just, and reasonable, and modest demand that Job had made (Job 12:3), Allow that I have understanding as well as you; but see how they seek occasion against him: that is misconstrued, as if he pretended to be wiser than any man. Because he will not grant to them the monopoly of wisdom, they will have it thought that he claims it to himself, Job 15:7-9. As if he thought he had the advantage of all mankind, 1. In length of acquaintance with the world, which furnishes men with so much the more experience: "Art thou the first man that was born; and, consequently, senior to us, and better able to give the sense of antiquity and the judgment of the first and earliest, the wisest and purest, ages? Art thou prior to Adam?" So it may be read. "Did not he suffer for sin; and yet wilt not thou, who art so great a sufferer, own thyself a sinner? Wast thou made before the hills, as Wisdom herself was? Pro 8:23, etc. Must God's counsels, which are as the great mountains (Psa 36:6), and immovable as the everlasting hills, be subject to thy notions and bow to them? Dost thou know more of the world than any of us do? No, thou art but of yesterday even as we are," Job 8:9. Or, 2. In intimacy of acquaintance with God (Job 15:8): "Hast thou heard the secret of God? Dost thou pretend to be of the cabinet-council of heaven, that thou canst give better reasons than others can for God's proceedings?" There are secret things of God, which belong not to us, and which therefore we must not pretend to account for. Those are daringly presumptuous who do. He also represents him, (1.) As assuming to himself such knowledge as none else had: "Dost thou restrain wisdom to thyself, as if none were wise besides?" Job had said (Job 13:2), What you know, the same do I know also; and now they return upon him, according to the usage of eager disputants, who think they have a privilege to commend themselves: What knowest thou that we know not? How natural are such replies as these in the heat of argument! But how simple do they look afterwards, upon the review! (2.) As opposing the stream of antiquity, a venerable name, under the shade of which all contending parties strive to shelter themselves: "With us are the gray-headed and very aged men, Job 15:10. We have the fathers on our side; all the ancient doctors of the church are of our opinion." A thing soon said, but not so soon proved; and, when proved, truth is not so soon discovered and proved by it as most people imagine. David preferred right scripture-knowledge before that of antiquity (Psa 119:100): I understand more than the ancients, because I keep thy precepts. Or perhaps one or more, if not all three, of these friends of Job, were older than he (Job 32:6), and therefore they thought he was bound to acknowledge them to be in the right. This also serves contenders to make a noise with to very little purpose. If they are older than their adversaries, and can say they knew such a thing before their opponents were born, this will not serve to justify them in being arrogant and overbearing; for the oldest are not always the wisest, Job 32:9.

IV. He charges him with a contempt of the counsels and comforts that were given him by his friends (Job 15:11): Are the consolations of God small with thee? 1. Eliphaz takes it ill that Job did not value the comforts which he and his friends administered to him more than it seems he did, and did not welcome every word they said as true and important. It is true they had said some very good things, but, in their application to Job, they were miserable comforters. Note, We are apt to think that great and considerable which we ourselves say, when others perhaps with good reason think it small and trifling. Paul found that those who seemed to be somewhat, yet, in conference, added nothing to him, Gal 2:6. 2. He represents this as a slight put upon divine consolations in general, as if they were of small account with him, whereas really they were not. If he had not highly valued them, he could not have borne up as he did under his sufferings. Note, (1.) The consolations of God are not in themselves small. Divine comforts are great things, that is, the comfort which is from God, especially the comfort which is in God. (2.) The consolations of God not being small in themselves, it is very lamentable if they be small with us. It is a great affront to God, and an evidence of a degenerate depraved mind, to disesteem and undervalue spiritual delights and despise the pleasant land. "What!" (says Eliphaz) "is there any secret thing with thee? Hast thou some cordial to support thyself with, that is a proprium, an arcanum, that nobody else can pretend to, or knows any thing of?" Or, "Is there some secret sin harboured and indulged in thy bosom, which hinders the operation of divine comforts?" None disesteem divine comforts but those that secretly affect the world and the flesh.

V. He charges him with opposition to God himself and to religion (Job 15:12, Job 15:13): "Why doth thy heart carry thee away into such indecent irreligious expressions?" Note, Every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust, Jam 1:14. if we fly off from God and our duty, or fly out into anything amiss, it is our own heart that carries us away. If thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it. There is a violence, an ungovernable impetus, in the turnings of the soul; the corrupt heart carries men away, as it were, by force, against their convictions. "What is it that thy eyes wink at? Why so careless and mindless of what is said to thee, hearing it as if thou wert half asleep? Why so scornful, disdaining what we say, as if it were below thee to take notice of it? What have we said that deserves to be thus slighted - nay, that thou turnest thy spirit against God?" It was bad that his heart was carried away from God, but much worse that it was turned against God. But those that forsake God will soon break out in open enmity to him. But how did this appear? Why, "Thou lettest such words go out of thy mouth, reflecting on God, and his justice and goodness." It is the character of the wicked that they set their mouth against the heavens (Psa 73:9), which is a certain indication that the spirit is turned against God. He thought Job's spirit was soured against God, and so turned from what it had been, and exasperated at his dealings with him. Eliphaz wanted candour and charity, else he would not have put such a harsh construction upon the speeches of one that had such a settled reputation for piety and was now in temptation. This was, in effect, to give the cause on Satan's side, and to own that Job had done as Satan said he would, had cursed God to his face.

VI. He charges him with justifying himself to such a degree as even to deny his share in the common corruption and pollution of the human nature (Job 15:14): What is man, that he should be clean? that is, that he should pretend to be so, or that any should expect to find him so. What is he that is born of a woman, a sinful woman, that he should be righteous? Note, 1. Righteousness is cleanness; it makes us acceptable to God and easy to ourselves, Psa 18:24. 2. Man, in his fallen state, cannot pretend to be clean and righteous before God, either to acquit himself to God's justice or recommend himself to his favour. 3. He is to be adjudged unclean and unrighteous because born of a woman, from whom he derives a corrupt nature, which is both his guilt and his pollution. With these plain truths Eliphaz thinks to convince Job, whereas he had just now said the same (Job 14:4): Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? But does it therefore follow that Job is a hypocrite, and a wicked man, which is all that he denied? By no means. Though man, as born of a woman, is not clean, yet, as born again of the Spirit, he is clean. 4. Further to evince this he here shows, (1.) That the brightest creatures are imperfect and impure before God, Job 15:15. God places no confidence in saints and angels; he employs both, but trusts neither with his service, without giving them fresh supplies of strength and wisdom for it, as knowing they are not sufficient of themselves, neither more nor better than his grace makes them. He takes no complacency in the heavens themselves. How pure soever they seem to us, in his eye they have many a speck and many a flaw: The heavens are not clean in his sight. If the stars (says Mr. Caryl) have no light in the sight of the sun, what light has the sun in the sight of God! See Isa 24:23. (2.) That man is much more so (Job 15:16): How much more abominable and filthy is man! If saints are not to be trusted, much less sinners. If the heavens are not pure, which are as God made them, much less man, who is degenerated. Nay, he is abominable and filthy in the sight of God, and if ever he repent he is so in his own sight, and therefore he abhors himself. Sin is an odious thing, it makes men hateful. The body of sin is so, and is therefore called a dead body, a loathsome thing. Is it not a filthy thing, and enough to make any one sick, to see a man eating swine's food or drinking some nauseous and offensive stuff? Such is the filthiness of man that he drinks iniquity (that abominable thing which the Lord hates) as greedily, and with as much pleasure, as a man drinks water when he is thirsty. It is his constant drink; it is natural to sinners to commit iniquity. It gratifies, but does not satisfy, the appetites of the old man. It is like water to a man in a dropsy. The more men sin the more they would sin.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
MORALS ON THE BOOK OF JOB 12.34-36
It is as if Eliphaz said to Job in plain words, “If you would amend your profession of faith, you might long ago have possessed consolation in your scourges.” “Why does your heart puff you up? Have your eyes astonished you as though you were thinking of great things?” Often the mind of the righteous is so suspended in contemplating things on high that outwardly their face seems to have been struck with astonishment. Because heretics are not taught to enforce the power of contemplation in secret, they think that when the just and those that are imbued with right understanding do so, it is more out of hypocrisy than truth. They believe that whatever they themselves cannot obtain possession of must not exist in others in any genuine way either. “Why does your spirit swell against God, that you let such words go out of your mouth?” Very often when the righteous are afflicted with any woes, they are forced to confess their works, as blessed Job had done, who after living righteously was beaten down by the stokes of the rod; but when the unrighteous hear the sayings of the righteous, they think that they are uttered in self-exaltation rather than in truth. For they weigh the words of the righteous by their own feelings and do not think that good words can be said in a humble spirit. For as it is a great sin for a person to ascribe to himself what is not there, so it is commonly no sin at all if he speaks the good that there is with humility. Hence it often happens that the just and unjust speak words that are similar, but always a heart that is widely dissimilar. By the same sayings for which the Lord is offended by the unrighteous, he is even propitiated by the righteous. Thus the Pharisee, when he entered the temple, said, “I fast twice in the week; I give tithes of all that I possess.” But the publican went out justified more than he. Hezekiah too, the king, when he was afflicted with sickness of the body and brought to the last point of life, said with his heart pierced in prayer, “Remember now, O Lord, I beseech you, how I have walked before you in truth, and with a perfect heart.” Nor yet did the Lord disregard this confession of his perfection, or refuse him, whom he immediately heard effectually in his prayers. See, the Pharisee justified himself in act, and Hezekiah maintained himself to be just in thought as well, and by the same act the one offended and the other propitiated God. Does not almighty God estimate the words of each by the thoughts within, and in his ear are not those high that are uttered with a lowly heart? Hence blessed Job, when he put forward his deeds, did not in the least degree act proudly against God, in that those things that he had really done, he spoke with a humble spirit.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
34. As if he said to him in plain words; ‘If thou wouldest amend thy profession of faith, thou mightest long ago have had consolation in thy scourges.’
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 15:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.