Skip to content

Job 11:4

“Zophar Condemns Job's Claims”Job 11:1–6

King James Version
For thou hast said, My doctrine is pure, and I am clean in thine eyes.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
For thou hast said H559, My doctrine H3948 is pure H2134, and I am clean H1249 in thine eyes H5869.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
You have said, ‘My doctrine is sound, and I am pure in Your sight.’

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
For thou sayest, My doctrine is pure, And I am clean in thine eyes.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
For you say, ‘My doctrine is pure. I am clean in your eyes.’

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
For thou hast sayde, My doctrine is pure, and I am cleane in thine eyes.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And thou sayest, `Pure is my discourse, And clean I have been in Thine eyes.'

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
6 Hebrew words
  1. וַתֹּאמֶרVa·to·merand you have saidH559Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-2msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 2nd Singular Masculineוַandתֹּאמֶרyou have said
  2. זַךְzakh[is] pureH2134Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absolute
  3. לִקְחִיlik·Chimy teachingH3948N-msc ¦ 1csNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixלִקְחִteachingיmy
  4. וּבַרu·Varand cleanH1249Conj-w ¦ Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absoluteוּandבַרclean
  5. הָיִיתִיha·Yi·tiI amH1961V-Qal-Perf-1csVerb Qal Perfect 1st Singular common gender
  6. בְעֵינֶיךָve·'ei·Nei·khain your viewH5869Prep-b ¦ N-fdc ¦ 2msNoun Dual Feminine Construct with suffixבְinעֵינֶיviewךָyour
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 13,113 of 31,102 · 42.2%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Zophar sums up Job’s case as a boast that his teaching is pure and that he is clean in God’s eyes, stretching Job’s claim of integrity into a claim of perfection.

“For thou hast said,”

Zophar’s own summary of Job’s words, and an unfair one.

“My doctrine is pure,”

Leqach is teaching or instruction, here Job’s argument and stand, and zak is clear or pure. Zophar hears Job claiming that his reasoning is beyond fault.

“and I am clean in thine eyes.”

Bar, clean or pure, turns the claim toward God’s sight. Job had defended his integrity, and Zophar has turned that into a boast of sinlessness.

Passage studyJob 11:1–6

Zophar Condemns Job’s Claim to Be Clean

1Then answered Zophar the Naamathite, and said, 2Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man full of talk be justified? 3Should thy lies make men hold their peace? and when thou mockest, shall no man make thee ashamed? 4For thou hast said, My doctrine is pure, and I am clean in thine eyes. 5But oh that God would speak, and open his lips against thee; 6And that he would shew thee the secrets of wisdom, that they are double to that which is! Know therefore that God exacteth of thee less than thine iniquity deserveth.

Summary

Zophar the Naamathite, the third of Job’s friends, now speaks for the first time, and he is the bluntest of them all. He calls Job’s long defence a multitude of words, names his words lies and mockery, and sums up Job’s whole case as a boast that he is pure and clean in God’s eyes. Then he wishes that God would speak against Job and show him the hidden depths of wisdom, and he closes with a hard verdict: God is exacting less from Job than his iniquity deserves. Much of what Zophar says about God’s wisdom is true. He applies it to a man the book has already called blameless, and God himself later rebukes the friends for what they said of him (Job 42:7–9). In these six verses we see sound words about God turned against a suffering believer, and we are pointed toward the God who does speak, finally and fully, in his Son.

Who Zophar is, and where his speech falls

Job has poured out his grief (Job 3), Eliphaz has spoken (Job 4–5), Bildad has spoken (Job 8), and Job has answered each of them. His last reply ends in a direct plea to God to show him why he suffers and a protest of his innocence (Job 10). Zophar now completes the first round of the debate. All three friends hold that suffering is always the sufferer’s own fault. Eliphaz leaned on what had been revealed to him and Bildad on the wisdom of the fathers, while Zophar argues from a stark logic of justice and comes straight to accusation.

His whole speech fills Job 11. These six verses are its opening rebuke. He then praises God’s unsearchable wisdom (Job 11:7–9) and ends by calling Job to repent, with a promise of restoration if he does (Job 11:13–19). The book sets all these human speeches before God’s own answer from the whirlwind (Job 38–41).

The name Tsôwphar means “departing”. He is called Naʻămâthîy, a man from a place whose name matches Naamah, though it is a different place from the town of that name. It is generally placed in Edom or Arabia, which puts Zophar among the men of the east. The great questions of this book are being argued out among Job’s wider circle, well beyond Israel.

“Answered” is ʻânâh, to answer or respond, and the Hebrew opens with wayyaʿan, “and he answered”. The same verb comes back in verse 2, where Zophar asks whether Job’s words should “be answered”. His speech is a reply to what Job has just said, and he hears Job’s words as a challenge that must be met.

Zophar’s charge against Job’s words

“A man full of talk”

Zophar opens with two questions whose answers he takes to be obvious: “Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man full of talk be justified?” The two halves say the same thing in two ways. “Multitude” is rôb, abundance or greatness, and “words” is dâbâr, word or speech. “A man full of talk” is literally “a man of lips”, from ʼîysh, a man, and sâphâh, the lip, which by extension means speech or language. “Justified” is tsâdaq, to be right, to be just, or to be vindicated, in both the moral and the legal sense. Zophar means that a flood of talk can never put a man in the right before God, and that Job’s many words only count against him.

He leans on a truth that Scripture teaches plainly: “In the multitude of words there wanteth not sin” (Proverbs 10:19), and God’s people are to be swift to hear and slow to speak (James 1:19). Job had in fact spoken at length, and at times bitterly, even questioning God’s justice (Job 10:1–3). Zophar’s mistake lies in what he assumes those words are covering up. His friends expected Job to confess a sin and repent, so every protest of innocence sounded to them like defiance. Job’s words were the cries of a righteous man in suffering he could not understand. And Zophar, who rebukes Job for his many words, goes on to make a long speech of his own.

“Thy lies” and “when thou mockest”

Verse 3 is sharper still. “Lies” is bad, a brag or a lie, and the same word can mean a liar. Zophar is accusing Job of deliberate falsehood. “Should thy lies make men hold their peace?” asks whether Job’s talk is to silence everyone else, as though no one could answer it. “Mockest” is lâʻag, to deride or laugh to scorn. Zophar hears Job’s complaints as scorn poured on God’s justice and on the wisdom the friends have been handing down. “Ashamed” is kâlam, to be ashamed or disgraced, and in the form used here, to put someone to shame. Among the men of the east honour and shame weighed heavily, and Zophar wants someone to step forward and humble Job in front of others. He has made himself that someone.

He has misjudged the man in front of him. Scripture calls it folly to answer a matter before hearing it out (Proverbs 18:13), and Jesus warns against judging others (Matthew 7:1). Zophar sets out to shame Job, and by the end of the book, in Job 42, it is the friends’ counsel that God puts to shame.

What Job claimed, and what Zophar heard

“For thou hast said, My doctrine is pure, and I am clean in thine eyes.” Zophar puts these words in Job’s mouth as a summary of everything Job has said. “Doctrine” is leqach, teaching or instruction, a word that comes from the verb to take or receive. Here it means Job’s argument, his whole stand on his innocence and his suffering. “Pure” is zak, clear, clean or pure, and “clean” is bar, pure or clean. Set side by side, they make the claim as strong as it can be. The phrase “in thine eyes” turns from Job’s view of himself to God’s view of him, and that is the heart of the charge: Zophar hears Job saying he can stand before God without fault.

Did Job claim to be sinless?

Job claimed to be innocent of the grievous sins his friends were hinting at, and he refused to let go of his integrity (Job 27:6). He told God that he knew Job was not wicked (Job 10:7). The book itself opens by describing him as blameless and upright (Job 1:1). Yet Job also asked how a man could be just with God (Job 9:2), and he wrestled with the thought that even if he were perfect, his own mouth would condemn him (Job 9:20–21). Zophar has stretched a man’s defence of his integrity into a boast of perfection, so that Job looks proud and irreverent. He will soon say that God’s wisdom is past finding out (Job 11:7–9), while he claims to know exactly why Job suffers.

Beneath the unfair charge lies a real truth. If the LORD marked every iniquity, no one could stand before him (Psalm 130:3), and all have sinned and come short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). Any person who is clean in God’s eyes is clean by his gift, and Job himself longed for someone to stand between him and God.

Zophar’s wish that God would speak

“But oh that God would speak, and open his lips against thee.” The words “oh that” render a Hebrew phrase, mi yitten, that voices a strong wish. “Speak” is dâbar, to speak, tell or mention (Strong’s notes a rare sense, to subdue). “Open” is pâthach, to open wide or to loosen, and “lips” is sâphâh, the same word that stood behind “talk” in verse 2. Zophar has just called Job “a man of lips”. Now he wishes that God would open his own lips, sure that one word from God would settle the matter. And he says which way that word should go: “against thee”. He wants God to act as Job’s accuser, to expose Job’s hidden sin and to prove the friends right.

This is a bold thing to want. Zophar speaks as if he already knows what God would say. God did break his silence, from the whirlwind (Job 38:1–3), and the speech that followed was something Zophar never imagined. God set his own wisdom and the vastness of his creation before Job, humbling him and exposing how little any of the men understood. Then he turned to the friends and said they had spoken wrongly of him (Job 42:7–9). The LORD says through Isaiah that his thoughts and ways are as high above ours as the heavens are above the earth (Isaiah 55:8–9).

When God speaks, he does sometimes pronounce judgment, as he did after the fall (Genesis 3:17–19). He also speaks to make himself known, to give his promises, his law and his salvation, and in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–2).

The secrets of wisdom and Zophar’s verdict

“And that he would shew thee the secrets of wisdom, that they are double to that which is!” “Secrets” is taʻălummâh, something hidden or concealed. “Double” is kephel, twofold. Zophar means that God’s wisdom has far more to it than anything a man can see, and he implies that God knows far more about Job’s sin than Job admits. He gives a true picture of God’s wisdom, and Paul praises the same depth: “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God!” (Romans 11:33–36).

Then comes the verdict: “Know therefore that God exacteth of thee less than thine iniquity deserveth.” The words “less” and “deserveth” were supplied by the translators to complete the sense. The KJV renders the verb nâshâh “exacteth”, and on that rendering Zophar pictures God as a creditor who holds Job to account for a debt and mercifully collects less than is owed. In Zophar’s eyes, Job should be grateful that his suffering is so light. It is a crushing thing to say to a man who has lost his children, his wealth and his health. And it is also the plainest statement in the friends’ speeches of the belief the whole book answers, that suffering is measured out exactly to fit a person’s sin.

Was Zophar wrong about everything?

Zophar spoke truly when he said that God’s wisdom is beyond our understanding and that God is just. It is also true that God has not dealt with us according to our sins (Psalm 103:10). His error lay in applying these truths to Job, presuming his guilt without evidence and claiming to know the exact measure of God’s justice and mercy in Job’s case. He used a truth about God to condemn a man. God’s own verdict settles it: the friends had spoken wrongly of him, and Job’s suffering came from somewhere other than his sin (Job 42:7–9).

How these verses point to Christ

Zophar wished that God would open his lips against a sufferer. God has spoken his fullest word in the Word made flesh (John 1:1–14), and he sent his Son into the world so that the world through him might be saved (John 3:17). For those who are in Christ Jesus, the sentence of condemnation is lifted (Romans 8:1). Job himself longed for a mediator to stand between him and God (Job 9:33) and for a Redeemer (Job 19:25), and in Christ that longing is met.

Zophar asked whether a man full of talk could be justified. Paul answers that by the deeds of the law no flesh is justified in God’s sight (Romans 3:20), and that we are justified by faith (Romans 3:28), with a righteousness that comes from God through faith in Christ (Philippians 3:9). Christ is made unto us righteousness (1 Corinthians 1:30). The only way to be clean in God’s eyes, as Zophar heard Job claim to be, is through the one who was tempted in all points like us, “yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). He made us clean through the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Ghost (Titus 3:5), and his blood cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7).

Zophar wanted Job shamed and silenced for lies he never told. Jesus, wholly innocent, faced false witnesses (Matthew 26:59–60), was mocked by soldiers with a purple robe and a crown of thorns (Mark 15:17), and held his peace like a lamb before its shearers (Isaiah 53:7). He endured the cross, despising the shame, for the joy set before him (Hebrews 12:2). He bore our griefs and carried our sorrows (Isaiah 53:4–5), and God made him to be sin for us so that we might be made the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21). God shows his love in this, that Christ died for us while we were yet sinners (Romans 5:8).

Zophar told Job that God exacted less than his iniquity deserved. At the cross God laid on his Son the iniquity of us all (Isaiah 53:5–6), the whole debt and more than a part of it, so that those who believe receive pardon in full. The secrets of wisdom Zophar spoke about are opened in Christ, who is himself the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24).

Sound words and a suffering friend

Zophar’s opening is a sober picture of how true things about God can be spoken in a way God rejects. Every one of his claims about God’s wisdom and justice can be found elsewhere in Scripture, yet he spoke them to the wrong man, about the wrong cause, and without hearing him out. Proverbs warns of the man who is wise in his own eyes (Proverbs 26:12), and Job’s own verdict on his friends’ counsel comes two chapters later (Job 13:4).

What this passage gives us above all is a view of God that is larger than Zophar’s. God’s wisdom really is deeper than we can measure (Romans 11:33–36), and that depth is a reason for humility when we stand beside someone in pain. The God whom Zophar wanted to see condemn has spoken in his Son, and the word he speaks there is grace. James puts the lesson of Zophar’s speech in one line: be swift to hear and slow to speak (James 1:19).

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Job 11:1–6. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 6 verses
Passage under commentJob 11:1–6
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

It is sad to see what intemperate passions even wise and good men are sometimes betrayed into by the heat of disputation, of which Zophar here is an instance. Eliphaz began with a very modest preface, Job 4:2. Bildad was a little more rough upon Job, Job 8:2. But Zophar falls upon him without mercy, and gives him very bad language: Should a man full of talk be justified? And should thy lies make men hold their peace? Is this the way to comfort Job? No, nor to convince him neither. Does this become one that appears as an advocate for God and his justice? Tantaene animis coelestibus irae? - In heavenly breasts can such resentment dwell? Those that engage in controversy will find it very hard to keep their temper. All the wisdom, caution, and resolution they have will be little enough to prevent their breaking out into such indecencies as we here find Zophar guilty of.

I.He represents Job otherwise than what he was, Job 11:2, Job 11:3.

He would have him thought idle and impertinent in his discourse, and one that loved to hear himself talk; he gives him the lie, and calls him a mocker; and all this that it might be looked upon as a piece of justice to chastise him. Those that have a mind to fall out with their brethren, and to fall foul upon them, find it necessary to put the worst colours they can upon them and their performances, and, right or wrong, to make them odious. We have read and considered Job's discourses in the foregoing chapters, and have found them full of good sense and much to the purpose, that his principles are right, his reasonings strong, many of his expressions weighty and very considerable, and that what there is in them of heat and passion a little candour and charity will excuse and overlook; and yet Zophar here invidiously represents him,

1.As a man that never considered what he said, but uttered what came uppermost, only to make a noise with the multitude of words, hoping by that means to carry his cause and run down his reprovers: Should not the multitude of words be answered? Truly, sometimes it is no great matter whether it be or no; silence perhaps is the best confutation of impertinence and puts the greatest contempt upon it. Answer not a fool according to his folly. But, if it be answered, let reason and grace have the answering of it, not pride and passion. Should a man full of talk (margin, a man of lips, that is all tongue, vox et praeterea nihil - mere voice) be justified? Should he be justified in his loquacity, as in effect he is if he be not reproved for it? No, for in the multitude of words there wanteth not sin. Should he be justified by it? Shall many words pass for valid pleas? Shall he carry the day with the flourishes of language? No, he shall not be accepted with God, or any wise men, for his much speaking, Matthew 6:7.

2.As a man that made no conscience of what he said - a liar, and one that hoped by the impudence of lies to silence his adversaries (should thy lies make men hold their peace?) - a mocker, one that bantered all mankind, and knew how to put false colours upon any thing, and was not ashamed to impose upon every one that talked with him: When thou mockest shall no man make thee ashamed? Is it not time to speak, to stem such a violent tide as this? Job was not mad, but spoke the words of truth and soberness, and yet was thus misrepresented. Eliphaz and Bildad had answered him, and said what they could to make him ashamed; it was therefore no instance of Zophar's generosity to set upon a man so violently who was already thus harassed. Here were three matched against one.

II.He charges Job with saying that which he had not said (Job 11:4):

Thou hast said, My doctrine is pure. And what if he had said so? It was true that Job was sound in the faith, and orthodox in his judgment, and spoke better of God than his friends did. If he had expressed himself unwarily, yet it did not therefore follow but that his doctrine was true. But he charges him with saying, I am clean in thy eyes. Job had not said so: he had indeed said, Thou knowest that I am not wicked (Job 10:7); but he had also said, I have sinned, and never pretended to a spotless perfection. He had indeed maintained that he was not a hypocrite as they charged him; but to infer thence that he would not own himself a sinner was an unfair insinuation. We ought to put the best construction on the words and actions of our brethren that they will bear; but contenders are tempted to put the worst.

III.He appeals to God, and wishes him to appear against Job.

So very confident is he that Job is in the wrong that nothing will serve him but that God must immediately appear to silence and condemn him. We are commonly ready with too much assurance to interest God in our quarrels, and to conclude that, if he would but speak, he would take our part and speak for us, as Zophar here: O that God would speak! for he would certainly open his lips against thee; whereas, when God did speak, he opened his lips for Job against his three friends. We ought indeed to leave all controversies to be determined by the judgment of God, which we are sure is according to truth; but those are not always in the right who are most forward to appeal to that judgment and prejudge it against their antagonists. Zophar despairs to convince Job himself, and therefore desires God would convince him of two things which it is good for every one of us duly to consider, and under all our afflictions cheerfully to confess: -

1.The unsearchable depth of God's counsels. Zophar cannot pretend to do it, but he desires that God himself would show Job so much of the secrets of the divine wisdom as might convince him that they are at least double to that which is, Job 11:6. Note,

(1.)There are secrets in the divine wisdom, arcana imperii - state-secrets. God's way is in the sea. Clouds and darkness are round about him. He has reasons of state which we cannot fathom and must not pry into.

(2.)What we know of God is nothing to what we cannot know. What is hidden is more than double to what appears, Ephesians 3:9.

(3.)By employing ourselves in adoring the depth of those divine counsels of which we cannot find the bottom we shall very much tranquilize our minds under the afflicting hand of God.

(4.)God knows a great deal more evil of us than we do of ourselves; so some understand it. When God gave David a sight and sense of sin he said that he had in the hidden part made him to know wisdom, Psalm 51:6.

2.The unexceptionable justice of his proceedings. "Know therefore that, how sore soever the correction is that thou art under, God exacteth of thee less than thy iniquity deserves," or (as some read it), "he remits thee part of thy iniquity, and does not deal with thee according to the full demerit of it." Note,

(1.)When the debt of duty is not paid it is justice to insist upon the debt of punishment.

(2.)Whatever punishment is inflicted upon us in this world we must own that it is less than our iniquities deserve, and therefore, instead of complaining of our troubles, we must be thankful that we are out of hell, Lamentations 3:39; Psalm 103:10.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 450–604
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 450Hesychius of JerusalemPost-NiceneSourceHOMILIES ON JOB 14.11.4-6
Previously Job had already said, “If I am ungodly, why have I not died?” Did he not define himself as “blameless”? These words do not belong to Job but to God. It is God, in fact, who designated Job as blameless in his actions and as a man “who turns away from evil.” Therefore you (i.e., Zophar) refuse the testimony of God himself.
d. AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
4. Whoso remembers the words of blessed Job, knows how falsely this charge is fastened upon his voice. For how could he call himself pure, who says, If I justify myself, mine own mouth shall condemn me [Job 9, 20]; but there is this in the wickedness of the unrighteous, that, while it refuses to bewail real evil things in itself it invents them in others, for it makes use of it as a solace of evil doing, if the life of the reprover can be also stained with false accusations. But we must know that for the most part the wicked wish what is good so far as the lips, in order that they may show that that is bad which we have at present, and as if from the good will they bear others, they pray for favourable circumstances, in order that they may appear full of kindly affection.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Job 11:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8