Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Wherefore the princes were wroth with Jeremiah, and smote him, and put him in prison in the house of Jonathan the scribe: for they had made that the prison.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Wherefore the princes H8269 were wroth H7107 with Jeremiah H3414, and smote H5221 him, and put H5414 him in prison H612 in the house H1004 of Jonathan H3083 the scribe H5608: for they had made H6213 that the prison H3608.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The officials, furious with Yirmeyahu, had him beaten and jailed in the house of Y'honatan the secretary, which had been made over into a prison.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The officials were angry with Jeremiah, and they beat him and placed him in jail in the house of Jonathan the scribe, for it had been made into a prison.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the princes were wroth with Jeremiah, and smote him, and put him in prison in the house of Jonathan the scribe; for they had made that the prison.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The princes were angry with Jeremiah, and struck him, and put him in prison in the house of Jonathan the scribe; for they had made that the prison.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Wherefore the princes were angry with Ieremiah, and smote him, and layde him in prison in the house of Iehonathan the scribe: for they had made that the prison.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and the heads are wroth against Jeremiah, and have smitten him, and put him in the prison-house--the house of Jonathan the scribe, for it they had made for a prison-house.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 37:15 vividly recounts a pivotal and harrowing moment in the prophet Jeremiah's ministry: his unjust arrest, physical assault, and subsequent imprisonment by the enraged Judean princes. Accused falsely of desertion during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem, Jeremiah was subjected to a beating and confined in a makeshift prison, the converted house of Jonathan the scribe. This incident starkly illustrates the severe persecution Jeremiah endured for his unwavering faithfulness in delivering God's unpopular message of impending judgment and the necessity of submission to Babylon.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 37 is strategically placed within a narrative sequence that details the escalating tension between Jeremiah and Judah's leadership during the final siege of Jerusalem. Immediately preceding this verse, the Babylonian siege had been temporarily lifted due to the advance of Pharaoh's army from Egypt, instilling a false sense of hope among the Judeans (compare Jeremiah 37:5). Jeremiah, however, had unequivocally prophesied that the Babylonians would return, conquer the city, and that the Egyptian intervention would prove futile (Jeremiah 37:7-10). It is in this volatile atmosphere that Jeremiah attempts to leave Jerusalem to go to his ancestral home in Anathoth (Jeremiah 37:12). He is intercepted at the Benjamin Gate by a captain, Irijah, who, without evidence, accuses him of defecting to the Chaldeans (Jeremiah 37:13). Despite Jeremiah's fervent denial, he is brought before the powerful "princes" (Jeremiah 37:14), setting the stage for the unjust actions described in verse 15. This verse marks a significant escalation in Jeremiah's suffering, transitioning from verbal opposition to brutal physical violence and incarceration.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Jeremiah 37 unfold during the tumultuous reign of King Zedekiah, the last king of Judah, as Jerusalem faced its ultimate demise at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar's Babylonian army. The political landscape was fraught with internal divisions: one faction, including many of the "princes," advocated for resistance against Babylon and reliance on an Egyptian alliance, while Jeremiah, guided by divine revelation, insisted on submission to Babylon as God's decreed instrument of judgment. Jeremiah's message was widely perceived as unpatriotic, demoralizing, and even treasonous by the nationalistic elite. The "princes" were high-ranking officials in Zedekiah's court, wielding significant power and often acting as the primary antagonists to Jeremiah's prophetic ministry. Their decision to imprison Jeremiah in "the house of Jonathan the scribe" is particularly revealing. This was not a formal, established prison but a private dwelling, indicating an ad-hoc, perhaps desperate, measure to silence the prophet. Scribes in ancient Judah were often influential figures, serving in administrative, legal, and even diplomatic capacities within the royal court, suggesting Jonathan's house would have been a place of some prominence, now repurposed to suppress a dissenting voice. This act underscores the arbitrary and chaotic nature of justice in a kingdom spiraling towards collapse, where political expediency trumped righteous judgment.
  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 37:15 powerfully encapsulates several profound themes woven throughout the book of Jeremiah and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it starkly illustrates the persecution of God's messengers. Jeremiah's suffering is a quintessential example of how prophets, who faithfully deliver uncomfortable truths, are often met with hostility, rejection, and violence by those who refuse to hear God's word (Luke 11:49-51). His experience underscores the cost of prophetic faithfulness. Secondly, the verse exposes the deep-seated injustice and corruption within Judah's leadership. Jeremiah was innocent of the charge of desertion, yet he was unjustly beaten and imprisoned, revealing a ruling class that prioritized its own anger, political agenda, and nationalistic pride over truth, righteousness, and divine revelation. This moral and spiritual decay among the leaders was a primary catalyst for Judah's impending judgment. Lastly, despite Jeremiah's physical confinement, the passage implicitly speaks to God's unwavering sovereignty amidst human opposition. Though the prophet was imprisoned, God's word would not be bound, nor would His ultimate plan for Judah be thwarted. Jeremiah's continued suffering and steadfastness demonstrate his profound faithfulness under duress, serving as a powerful testament to his commitment to God's difficult and often painful call, a faithfulness that echoes the steadfastness of other persecuted figures in Scripture, such as Joseph or Paul.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • princes (Hebrew, sar', H8269): This word (H8269) denotes a "head person (of any rank or class)," signifying a high-ranking official, chief, or ruler. In this context, it refers to the powerful political and administrative leaders of Judah, members of King Zedekiah's court. Their collective action against Jeremiah highlights that the prophet's persecution was not merely individual animosity but institutional opposition sanctioned by the highest echelons of power, demonstrating the widespread rejection of God's message among the elite.
  • wroth (Hebrew, qâtsaph', H7107): The Hebrew term (H7107) means "to crack off," or figuratively, "to burst out in rage" or "to be angry/wroth." It conveys a strong, intense emotional hostility and indignation. This indicates that the princes' actions were driven by profound fury and resentment towards Jeremiah, likely fueled by his consistently unpopular prophecies of national doom and his call for submission to Babylon, which they perceived as treasonous and humiliating.
  • prison (Hebrew, keleʼ', H3608): This word (H3608) refers to "a prison" or "bond," specifically implying manacles or restraints for a prisoner (compare H612, ʼêçûwr, also translated as "prison" or "bond"). Its use here emphasizes the physical confinement and severe restriction of freedom Jeremiah experienced. This marks a significant escalation from verbal opposition to actual incarceration and physical suffering, symbolizing the desperate measures taken by the authorities to silence the prophet.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Wherefore the princes were wroth with Jeremiah": This opening clause establishes the emotional catalyst for the subsequent actions. The "princes" (high-ranking officials) were consumed by intense anger ("wroth") towards Jeremiah. This wrath stemmed from the prophet's unwavering proclamation of God's judgment and his counsel to surrender to Babylon, which directly contradicted their political strategies and nationalistic pride, leading them to view him as a traitor.
  • "and smote him": This phrase details the physical violence inflicted upon Jeremiah. The Hebrew verb implies a striking or beating, indicating that the princes did not merely order his imprisonment but also subjected him to physical abuse. This act underscores the depth of their malice, their disregard for justice, and the brutality with which they sought to punish the prophet for his inconvenient truths.
  • "and put him in prison": This describes the act of confinement, signifying Jeremiah's loss of liberty and his transition from an active public prophet to an incarcerated one. This imprisonment was a direct consequence of the princes' anger and their desire to neutralize Jeremiah's influence, marking a critical turning point in his ministry and personal suffering.
  • "in the house of Jonathan the scribe: for they had made that the prison": This final clause specifies the unusual location of Jeremiah's imprisonment and explains its nature. Being confined in a private dwelling, rather than a formal, established jail, highlights the arbitrary and ad-hoc character of the "justice" meted out by the princes. It suggests a desperate and immediate measure to silence Jeremiah, transforming a place of learning or administration (a scribe's house) into a place of confinement, thereby symbolizing the perversion of order, law, and truth by the corrupt leadership.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 37:15 employs several potent literary devices to underscore its message. Most notably, Irony pervades the verse, as the prophet of God, who faithfully speaks divine truth and warns of impending judgment for the nation's sins, is treated as a criminal, subjected to physical abuse, and unjustly imprisoned by the very leaders he seeks to warn. This profound reversal of roles highlights the spiritual blindness and moral decay of Judah's elite. The verse also utilizes Symbolism: the "prison" itself, particularly a makeshift one in a scribe's house, symbolizes not only Jeremiah's physical confinement but also the spiritual bondage and moral corruption of the leadership. By rejecting God's word and persecuting His messenger, they have effectively imprisoned themselves in their own defiance and folly, sealing their nation's fate. Furthermore, Jeremiah's suffering in this verse serves as Foreshadowing, pointing forward to the greater suffering of the ultimate Prophet, Jesus Christ, who would similarly be rejected, falsely accused, beaten, and imprisoned by the religious and political authorities of His time for delivering God's truth.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah's unjust suffering in Jeremiah 37:15 resonates deeply with the broader biblical theme of prophetic persecution and the profound cost of faithfulness to God's word. His experience powerfully illustrates that speaking God's truth, especially when it challenges prevailing norms, exposes sin, or contradicts comfortable illusions, frequently invites intense opposition, rejection, and even physical harm. This verse serves as a sobering reminder that God's messengers are often met with hostility by those who refuse to acknowledge their sin or God's sovereign judgment. Yet, even in confinement, God's word is not bound, and His purposes continue to unfold, demonstrating His unwavering sovereignty and faithfulness even amidst human injustice and suffering. Jeremiah's steadfastness in the face of such adversity foreshadows the enduring nature of God's truth and the ultimate triumph of His will.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 37:15 offers profound and challenging lessons for believers today, particularly concerning the nature of faithfulness in a world often hostile to divine truth. Jeremiah's steadfastness in the face of false accusations, physical abuse, and unjust imprisonment serves as a powerful model of unyielding endurance and integrity. We are called to examine our own hearts and ask if we are willing to stand for God's truth, as revealed in Scripture, even when it is unpopular, inconvenient, or carries a personal cost. This passage reminds us that opposition is not necessarily a sign of being outside God's will; rather, it can be an expected consequence of living a prophetic life, speaking truth to power, and challenging the status quo. It compels us to discern the motives behind resistance to truth, whether in society, within our communities, or even within our own hearts, and to resist the temptation to compromise our convictions for comfort, acceptance, or worldly gain. Ultimately, Jeremiah's experience encourages us to trust implicitly in God's sovereign hand, knowing that even in moments of profound injustice and suffering, He remains faithful, His purposes will prevail, and He can use our trials to refine our character, deepen our faith, and amplify His eternal message.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I respond when God's truth, as revealed in Scripture, directly challenges my personal comfort, my cultural norms, or the prevailing opinions around me?
  • In what specific ways might I be tempted to compromise my biblical convictions to avoid opposition, gain approval, or maintain peace at any cost?
  • How can Jeremiah's experience of unjust suffering strengthen my trust in God's sovereignty and His ultimate justice during my own trials or moments of perceived injustice?
  • What does it truly mean to be a "prophetic voice" for Christ in my sphere of influence today, and what potential costs might that entail for me personally?

FAQ

Why were the princes so angry with Jeremiah?

Answer: The princes were deeply "wroth" with Jeremiah primarily because his prophetic messages directly contradicted their political strategies, nationalistic aspirations, and their desire for self-preservation. Jeremiah consistently prophesied that Jerusalem would fall to Babylon and urged submission to Nebuchadnezzar, declaring him to be God's instrument of judgment (Jeremiah 37:7-10). This message was perceived as treasonous, demoralizing, and an affront to their national pride, especially as the princes hoped for deliverance through an alliance with Egypt. His warnings exposed their spiritual blindness and political folly, leading to intense personal and institutional animosity and a desire to silence him.

What was the significance of being imprisoned in "the house of Jonathan the scribe"?

Answer: Being imprisoned in "the house of Jonathan the scribe" rather than a formal, established jail highlights the ad-hoc and arbitrary nature of Jeremiah's detention. It suggests that the princes acted quickly and decisively to silence him, converting a private dwelling—likely a place associated with learning, administration, or legal affairs given Jonathan's role as a scribe—into a makeshift prison. This indicates either a lack of established correctional facilities or, more likely, the urgent and informal way in which the authorities sought to neutralize a perceived threat without the formalities of a proper legal process. It underscores the chaotic and unjust conditions prevalent in Jerusalem during the siege, where the rule of law was subverted by the whims of powerful, angry officials.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 37:15, detailing the prophet's unjust rejection, physical beating, and imprisonment for faithfully speaking God's truth, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate suffering of Jesus Christ, the perfect Prophet and Son of God. Jeremiah, a faithful messenger despised and afflicted by the very people he sought to warn, embodies a pattern that finds its perfect and climactic fulfillment in the person of Jesus. Like Jeremiah, Jesus was rejected by His own people (John 1:11), falsely accused by religious and political leaders (Mark 14:55-64), subjected to brutal physical abuse and beatings (Mark 15:15), and ultimately handed over for imprisonment and execution (Matthew 27:1-2). Both prophets endured immense suffering for faithfully delivering God's message of judgment and salvation. Jeremiah's confinement could not silence God's word, just as Christ's crucifixion, though seemingly a defeat, led to the ultimate triumph over sin and death, fulfilling the ancient prophecies of the suffering servant (Isaiah 53:3-5). In Jesus, we see the perfect embodiment of the persecuted prophet, whose unjust suffering became the means of our eternal salvation and the ultimate demonstration of God's redemptive plan.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 37 verses 11–21

We have here a further account concerning Jeremiah, who relates more passages concerning himself than any other of the prophets; for the histories of the lives and sufferings of God's ministers have been very serviceable to the church, as well as their preaching and writing.

I. We are here told that Jeremiah, when he had an opportunity for it, attempted to retire out of Jerusalem into the country (Jer 37:11, Jer 37:12): When the Chaldeans had broken up from Jerusalem because of Pharaoh's army, upon the notice of their advancing towards them, Jeremiah determined to go into the country, and (as the margin reads it) to slip away from Jerusalem in the midst of the people, who, in that interval of the siege, went out into the country to look after their affairs there. He endeavoured to steal away in the crowd; for, though he was a man of great eminence, he could well reconcile himself to obscurity, though he was one of a thousand, he was content to be lost in the multitude and buried alive in a corner, in a cottage. Whether he designed for Anathoth or no does not appear; his concerns might call him thither, but his neighbours there were such as (unless they had mended since Jer 11:21) might discourage him from coming among them; or he might intend to hide himself somewhere where he was not known, and fulfil his own wish (Jer 9:2), Oh that I had in the wilderness a lodging-place! Jeremiah found he could do no good in Jerusalem; he laboured in vain among them, and therefore determined to leave them. Note, there are times when it is the wisdom of good men to retire into privacy, to enter into the chamber and shut the doors about them, Isa 26:20.

II. That in this attempt he was seized as a deserter and committed to prison (Jer 37:13-15): He was in the gate of Benjamin, so far he had gained his point, when a captain of the ward, who probably had the charge of that gate, discovered him and took him into custody. he was the grandson of Hananiah, who, the Jews say, was Hananiah the false prophet, who contested with Jeremiah (Jer 28:10), and they add that this young captain had a spite to Jeremiah upon that account. He could not arrest him without some pretence, and that which he charges upon his is, Thou fallest away to the Chaldeans - an unlikely story, for the Chaldeans had now gone off, Jeremiah could not reach them; or, if he could, who would go over to a baffled army? Jeremiah therefore with good reason, and with both the confidence and the mildness of an innocent man, denies the charge: "It is false; I fall not away to the Chaldeans; I am going upon my own lawful occasions." Note, it is no new thing for the church's best friends to be represented as in the interest of her worst enemies. Thus have the blackest characters been put upon the fairest purest minds, and, in such a malicious world as this is, innocency, nay, excellency itself, is no fence against the basest calumny. When at any time we are thus falsely accused we may do as Jeremiah did, boldly deny the charge and then commit our cause to him that judges righteously. Jeremiah's protestation of his integrity, though he is a prophet, a man of God, a man of honour and sincerity, though he is a priest, and is ready to say it in verbo sacerdotis - on the word of a priest, is not regarded; but he is brought before the privy-council, who without examining him and the proofs against him, but upon the base malicious insinuation of the captain, fell into a passion with him: they were wroth; and what justice could be expected from men who, being in anger, would hear no reason? They beat him, without any regard had to his coat and character, and then put him in prison, in the worst prison they had, that in the house of Jonathan the scribe; either it had been his house, and he had quitted it for the inconveniences of it, but it was thought good enough for a prison, or it was now his house, and perhaps he was a rigid severe man, that made it a house of cruel bondage to his prisoners. Into this prison Jeremiah was thrust, into the dungeon, which was dark and cold, damp and dirty, the most uncomfortable unhealthy place in it; in the cells, or cabins, there he must lodge, among which there is no choice, for they are all alike miserable lodging-places. There Jeremiah remained many days, and for aught that appears, nobody came near him or enquired after him. See what a world this is. The wicked princes, who are in rebellion against God, lie at ease, lie in state in their palaces, while godly Jeremiah, who is in the service of God, lies in pain, in a loathsome dungeon. It is well that there is a world to come.

III. That Zedekiah at length sent for him, and showed him some favour; but probably not till the Chaldean army had returned and had laid fresh siege to the city. When their vain hopes, with which they fed themselves (an in confidence of which they had re-enslaved their servants, Jer 34:11), had all vanished, then they were in a greater confusion and consternation then ever. "O then" (says Zedekiah) "send in all haste for the prophet; let me have some talk with him." When the Chaldeans had withdrawn, he only sent to the prophet to pray for him; but now that they had again invested the city, he sent for him to consult him. Thus gracious will men be when pangs come upon them. 1. The king sent for him to give him private audience as an ambassador from God. He asked him secretly in his house, being ashamed to be seen in his company, "Is there any word from the Lord? (Jer 37:17) - any word of comfort? Canst thou give us any hopes that the Chaldeans shall again retire?" Note, Those that will not hearken to God's admonitions when they are in prosperity would be glad of his consolations when they are in adversity and expect that his ministers should then speak words of peace to them; but how can they expect it? What have they to do with peace? Jeremiah's life and comfort are in Zedekiah's hand, and he has now a petition to present to him for his favour, and yet, having this opportunity, he tells him plainly that there is a word from the Lord, but no word of comfort for him or his people: Thou shalt be delivered into the hand of the king of Babylon. If Jeremiah had consulted with flesh and blood, he would have given him a plausible answer, and, though he would not have told him a lie, yet he might have chosen whether he would tell him the worst at this time; what occasion was there for it, when he had so often told it him before? But Jeremiah was one that had obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful, and would not, to obtain mercy of man, be unfaithful either to God or to his prince; he therefore tells him the truth, the whole truth. And, since there was no remedy, it would be a kindness to the king to know his doom, that, being no surprise to him, it might be the less a terror, and he might provide to make the best of bad. Jeremiah takes this occasion to upbraid him and his people with the credit they gave to the false prophets, who told them that the king of Babylon should not come at all, or, when he had withdrawn, should not come again against them, Jer 37:19. "Where are now your prophets, who told you that you should have peace?" Note, Those who deceive themselves with groundless hopes of mercy will justly be upbraided with their folly when the event has undeceived them. 2. He improved this opportunity for the presenting of a private petition, as a poor prisoner, Jer 37:18, Jer 37:20. It was not in Jeremiah's power to reverse the sentence God had passed upon Zedekiah, but it was in Zedekiah's power to reverse the sentence which the princes had given against him; and therefore, since he thought him fit to be used as a prophet, he would not think him fit to be abused as the worst of malefactors. He humbly expostulates with the king: "What have I offended against thee, or thy servants, or this people, what law have I broken, what injury have I done to the common welfare, that you have put me in prison?" And many a one that has been very hardly dealt with has been able to make the same appeal and to make it good. He likewise earnestly begs, and very pathetically (Jer 37:20), Cause me to return to yonder noisome gaol, to the house of Jonathan the scribe, lest I die there. This was the language of innocent nature, sensible of its own grievances and solicitous for its own preservation. Though he was not at all unwilling to die God's martyr, yet, having so fair an opportunity to get relief, he would not let it slip, lest he should die his own murderer. When Jeremiah delivered God's message he spoke as one having authority, with the greatest boldness; but, when he presented his own request, he spoke as one under authority, with the greatest submissiveness: Near me, I pray thee, O my Lord the king! let my supplication, I pray thee, be accepted before thee. Here is not a word of complaint of the princes that unjustly committed him, no offer to bring an action of false imprisonment against them, but all in a way of modest supplication to the king, to teach us that even when we act with the courage that becomes the faithful servants of God, yet we must conduct ourselves with the humility and modesty that become dutiful subjects to the government God hath set over us. A lion in God's cause must be a lamb in his own. And we find that God gave Jeremiah favour in the eyes of the king. (1.) He gave him his request, took care that he should not die in the dungeon, but ordered that he should have the liberty of the court of the prison, where he might have a pleasant walk and breathe a free air. (2.) He gave him more than his request, took care that he should not die for want, as many did that had their liberty, by reason of the straitness of the siege; he ordered him his daily bread out of the public stock (for the prison was within the verge of the court), till all the bread was spent. Zedekiah ought to have released him, to have made him a privy-counsellor, as Joseph was taken from prison to be the second man in the kingdom. But he had not courage to do that; it was well he did as he did, and it is an instance of the care God takes of his suffering servants that are faithful to him. He can make even their confinement turn to their advantage and the court of the of their prison to become as green pastures to them, and raise up such friends to provide for them that in the days of famine they shall be satisfied. At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–21. Public domain.
Copy as
Basil of CaesareaAD 379
HOMILIES ON THE PSALMS 14:3 (PS 29)
Thus there is the expression in Exodus: “From the firstborn of Pharaoh to the firstborn of the captive woman who was in the pit.” But they even threw Jeremiah also into a pit. His brothers through jealousy confined Joseph in a pit without water. Each act, therefore, either draws us downward by oppressing us with sin or lifts us upward by raising us on wings toward God. Therefore, you have saved me, I who formerly lived a wicked life, and have separated me from those who go down to the dark and frigid region. The meaning of the words “you have upheld me” is to say, “you have led me back from my downward course, so as not to give my enemies an occasion to rejoice over me.”
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On Jacob and the Blessed Life 1.9.42
Would anyone deny that Joseph was blessed in prison, where he interpreted dreams by the spirit of wisdom, revealing the truth and the sequence of future events? Would anyone deny that Isaiah was blessed when he was sawn in half? Jeremiah, when he was thrown into a pit? Daniel, when he stood unharmed among the lions, with the prophet's meal brought to him by an angel? Certainly, they were blessed not because they ate a meal that did not belong to them, but because they closed the mouths of the lions with their merits.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 37:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.