TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Jeremiah 26:16–24. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. The acquitting of Jeremiah from the charge exhibited against him. He had indeed spoken the words as they were laid in the indictment, but they are not looked upon to be seditious or treasonable, ill-intended or of any bad tendency, and therefore the court and country agree to find him not guilty. The priests and prophets, notwithstanding his rational plea for himself, continued to demand judgment against him; but the princes, and all the people, are clear in it that this man is not worthy to die (Jer 26:16); for (say they) he hath spoken to us, not of himself, but in the name of the Lord our God. And are they willing to own that he did indeed speak to them in the name of the Lord and that that Lord is their God? Why then did they not amend their ways and doings, and take the method he prescribed to prevent the ruin of their country? If they say, His prophecy is from heaven, it may justly be asked, Why did you not then believe him? Mat 21:25. Note, It is a pity that those who are so far convinced of the divine original of gospel preaching as to protect it from the malice of others do not submit to the power and influence of it themselves.
II.A precedent quoted to justify them in acquitting Jeremiah.
Some of the elders of the land, either the princes before mentioned or the more intelligent men of the people, stood up, and put the assembly in mind of a former case, as is usual with us in giving judgment; for the wisdom of our predecessors is a direction to us. The case referred to is that of Micah. We have extant the book of his prophecy among the minor prophets.
1.Was it thought strange that Jeremiah prophesied against this city and the temple? Micah did so before him, even in the reign of Hezekiah, that reign of reformation, Jer 26:18. Micah said it as publicly as Jeremiah had now spoken to the same purport, Zion shall be ploughed like a field, the building shall be all destroyed, so that nothing shall hinder but it may be ploughed; Jerusalem shall become heaps of ruins, and the mountain of the house on which the temple is built shall be as the high places of the forest, overrun with briers and thorns. That prophet not only spoke this, but wrote it, and left it on record; we find it, Mic 3:12. By this it appears that a man may be, as Micah was, a true prophet of the Lord, and yet may prophesy the destruction of Zion and Jerusalem. When we threaten secure sinners with the taking away of the Spirit of God and the kingdom of God from them, and declining churches with the removal of the candlestick, we say no more than what has been said many a time, and what we have warrant from the word of God to say.
2.Was it thought fit by the princes to justify Jeremiah in what he had done? It was what Hezekiah did before them in a like case. Did Hezekiah, and the people of Judah (that is, the representatives of the people, the commons in parliament), did they complain of Micah the prophet? Did they impeach him, or make an act to silence him and put him to death? No; on the contrary, they took the warning he gave them. Hezekiah, that renowned prince, of blessed memory, set a good example before his successors, for he feared the Lord (Jer 26:19), as Noah, who, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, was moved with fear. Micah's preaching drove him to his knees; he besought the Lord to turn away the judgment threatened and to be reconciled to them, and he found it was not in vain to do so, for the Lord repented him of the evil and returned in mercy to them; he sent an angel, who routed the army of the Assyrians, that threatened to plough Zion like a field. Hezekiah got good by the preaching, and then you may be sure he would do no harm to the preacher. These elders conclude that it would be of dangerous consequence to the state if they should gratify the importunity of the priests and prophets in putting Jeremiah to death: Thus might we procure great evil against our souls. Note, It is good to deter ourselves from sin with the consideration of the mischief we shall certainly do to ourselves by it and the irreparable damage it will be to our own souls.
III.Here is an instance of another prophet that was put to death by Jehoiakim for prophesying as Jeremiah had done, Jer 26:20, etc.
Some make this to be urged by the prosecutors, as a case that favoured the prosecution, a modern case, in which speaking such words as Jeremiah had spoken was adjudged treason. Others think that the elders, who were advocates for Jeremiah, alleged this to show that thus they might procure great evil against their souls, for it would be adding sin to sin. Jehoiakim, the present king, had slain one prophet already; let them not fill up the measure by slaying another. Hezekiah, who protected Micah, prospered; but did Jehoiakim prosper who slew Urijah? No; they all saw the contrary. As good examples, and the good consequences of them, should encourage us in that which is good, so the examples of bad men, and the bad consequences of them, should deter us from that which is evil. But some good interpreters take this narrative from the historian that penned the book, Jeremiah himself, or Baruch, who, to make Jeremiah's deliverance by means of the princes the more wonderful, takes notice of this that happened about the same time; for both were in the reign of Jehoiakim, and this in the beginning of his reign, Jer 26:1. Observe,
1.Urijah's prophecy. It was against this city, and this land, according to all the words of Jeremiah. The prophets of the Lord agreed in their testimony, and one would have thought that out of the mouth of so many witnesses the word would be regarded.
2.The prosecution of him for it, Jer 26:21. Jehoiakim and his courtiers were exasperated against him, and sought to put him to death; in this wicked design the king himself was principally concerned.
3.His absconding thereupon: When he heard that the king had become his enemy, and sought his life, he was afraid, and fled, and went in to Egypt. This was certainly his fault, and an effect of the weakness of his faith, and it sped accordingly. He distrusted God, and his power to protect him and bear him out; he was too much under the power of that fear of man which brings a snare. It looked as if he durst not stand to what he had said or was ashamed of his Master. It was especially unbecoming him to flee into Egypt, and so in effect to abandon the land of Israel and to throw himself quite out of the way of being useful. Note, There are many that have much grace, but they have little courage, that are very honest, but withal very timorous.
4.His execution notwithstanding. Jehoiakim's malice, one would think, might have contented itself with his banishment, and it might suffice to have driven him out of the country; but those are bloodthirsty that hate the upright, Pro 29:10. It was the life, that precious life, that he hunted after, and nothing else would satisfy him. So implacable is his revenge that he sends a party of soldiers into Egypt, some hundreds of miles, and they bring him back by force of arms. It would not sufficiently gratify him to have him slain in Egypt, but he must feed his eyes with the bloody spectacle. They brought him to Jehoiakim, and he slew him with the sword, for aught I know with his own hands. Yet neither did this satisfy his insatiable malice, but he loads the dead body of the good man with infamy, would not allow it the decent respects usually and justly paid to the remains of men of distinction, but cast it into the graves of the common people, as if he had not been a prophet of the Lord; thus was the shield of Saul vilely cast away, as though he had not been anointed with oil. Thus Jehoiakim hoped both to ruin his reputation with the people, that no heed might be given to his predictions, and to deter others from prophesying in like manner; but in vain; Jeremiah says the same. There is no contending with the word of God. Herod thought he had gained his point when he had cut off John Baptist's head, but found himself deceived when, soon after, he heard of Jesus Christ, and said, in a fright, This is John the Baptist.
IV.Here is Jeremiah's deliverance.
Though Urijah was lately put to death, and persecutors, when they have tasted the blood of saints, are apt to thirst after more (as Herod, Act 12:2, Act 12:3), yet God wonderfully preserved Jeremiah, though he did not flee, as Urijah did, but stood his ground. Ordinary ministers may use ordinary means, provided they be lawful ones, for their own preservation; but those that had an extraordinary protection. God raised up a friend for Jeremiah, whose hand was with him; he took him by the hand in a friendly way, encouraged him, assisted him, appeared for him. It was Ahikam the son of Shaphan, one that was a minister of state in Josiah's time; we read of him, Kg2 22:12. Some think Gedaliah was the son of this Ahikam. He had a great interest, it should seem, among the princes, and he used it in favour of Jeremiah, to prevent the further designs of the priests and prophets against him, who would have had him turned over into the hand of the people, not those people (Jer 26:16) that had adjudged him innocent, but the rude and insolent mob, whom they could persuade by their cursed insinuations not only to cry, Crucify him, crucify him, but to stone him to death in a popular tumult; for perhaps Jehoiakim had been so reproached by his own conscience for slaying Urijah that they despaired of making him the tool of their malice. Note, God can, when he pleases, raise up great men to patronize good men; and it is an encouragement to us to trust him in the way of duty that he has all men's hearts in his hands.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
(Verse 17 onwards) And the men of the elders of the land rose up and spoke to the whole assembly of the people, saying: Micaiah of Moresheth was a prophet in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and he spoke to all the people of Judah, saying: Thus says the Lord of hosts: Zion shall be plowed like a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps of ruins, and the mountain of the house like the high places of a forest. Did Hezekiah king of Judah and all Judah put him to death? Did they not fear the Lord and pray to the face of the Lord? And the Lord repented of the evil that he had spoken against them. Therefore, we are doing great evil against our own souls. The leaders of the city and the people understand the truth of judgment. However, the elders, whose duty it was to know the ancient things, recount the history - and the prophecy of Micah from Moresheth, who prophesied during the reign of King Hezekiah, they compare it with the prophecies of Jeremiah, for which he is being threatened with death; and they show that he said more serious things, and yet suffered nothing from the righteous king Hezekiah: but that those who turned to repentance, the sentence of the Lord turned into a good one. For Micah said: Zion shall be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become a heap of ruins, and the mountain of the house a wooded height (Micah 3:12). And Jeremiah further said: I will make this house like Shiloh, and I will make this city a curse for all the nations of the earth (Jeremiah 26:9). And they devised a plan, thinking that what Micah had prophesied would not come to pass, because a long time had passed without it happening due to the people's repentance. And this also, that Jeremiah spoke, it will by no means happen if they follow his counsel in their good ways and pursuits, and listen to the voice of the Lord their God, so that the Lord does not bring upon them the evil that he had threatened. At the same time, they break the fury of the accusers and join with them saying: Therefore, we commit great evil against our own souls: not that they should do so, but because if they do, they will not harm the accused, but their own souls, which they can free through a change of sentence.
Continue studying Jeremiah 26:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Jeremiah 26:19 captures a pivotal moment in Jeremiah's trial, where the elders and princes of Judah successfully defended the prophet by invoking the historical precedent of King Hezekiah. They argued that Hezekiah's humble and fearful response to the prophet Micah's dire warnings led to God relenting from the pronounced judgment, thereby averting catastrophe. This powerful historical analogy served as a compelling plea for the contemporary leadership and people to likewise fear the Lord, seek His favor, and avoid bringing catastrophic evil upon themselves by rejecting God's messenger and His word.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is deeply embedded within a dramatic and dangerous confrontation in Jeremiah's early ministry, specifically following his audacious "Temple Sermon" in Jeremiah 26:1-6. In this sermon, Jeremiah prophesied the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem, mirroring the fate of Shiloh, unless the people repented. This incendiary message provoked outrage among the priests, prophets, and the populace, who seized Jeremiah and clamored for his execution. Jeremiah 26:19 forms a crucial part of the defense presented by certain elders and princes, who intervened to save Jeremiah's life. They strategically employ a historical analogy, drawing a parallel between Jeremiah's situation and that of the prophet Micah during King Hezekiah's reign, arguing that a similar humble response could avert disaster. The surrounding verses detail Jeremiah's arrest, his own courageous defense, and the eventual intervention of these influential figures, highlighting a fleeting opportunity for Judah to avert its impending doom through repentance.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of Jeremiah 26 transpired during the tumultuous early years of King Jehoiakim's reign (c. 609-598 BC), a period characterized by political instability, spiritual apostasy, and the looming threat of Babylonian dominance, following the death of the reforming King Josiah. Jeremiah's prophecy of the temple's destruction was particularly inflammatory because the temple was widely regarded as an inviolable sanctuary, a symbol of God's permanent presence and an assurance of Jerusalem's immunity from destruction (a false sense of security often termed "temple theology"). The elders' defense strategically harks back to the reign of King Hezekiah (c. 715-686 BC), a revered monarch known for his piety, reforms, and trust in God, who ruled approximately a century before Jehoiakim. They specifically reference the prophet Micah's similar prophecy against Jerusalem and the temple in Micah 3:12, which strikingly parallels Jeremiah's message. The crucial difference, which the elders emphasize, is Hezekiah's response: unlike Jehoiakim's defiant posture, Hezekiah and the people responded with humility and repentance, leading God to relent from His declared judgment. This stark contrast was intended to persuade Jehoiakim and his officials to adopt a similar, life-saving course of action.
Key Themes
Jeremiah 26:19 powerfully illustrates several foundational themes within the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic tradition. Firstly, it underscores the conditional nature of divine judgment, demonstrating that God's pronouncements of "evil" (calamity) are often contingent upon human response. This allows for the possibility of repentance to avert disaster, a principle echoed throughout Scripture, such as in Joel 2:13-14. Secondly, the verse highlights the profound importance of heeding prophetic warning, portraying the acceptance of God's messenger as crucial for national survival, while rejection leads to certain doom. The prophet serves as God's mouthpiece, and to silence him is to reject God Himself. Thirdly, the passage showcases the concept of the fear of the LORD not as servile dread, but as a profound reverence and awe that compels humble obedience and a seeking of God's favor, a concept foundational to wisdom as articulated in Proverbs 9:10. Finally, it starkly presents the consequences of rejecting God's word, warning that to silence a prophet is to incur "great evil against our souls," implying a self-inflicted spiritual, national, and existential catastrophe.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Meaning "strengthened of Jah." This name is highly significant in the context of the elders' argument. It signifies a king whose reign was characterized by strength derived from his reliance upon the Lord. The elders' appeal to Hezekiah's example is not merely a historical reference but a theological one, invoking the memory of a righteous monarch whose trust in God led to divine favor and the averting of disaster, standing in stark contrast to the unfaithfulness and defiance of King Jehoiakim and his contemporaries.
Meaning "fearing; morally, reverent; afraid, fear(-ful)." In this verse, "fear" denotes a profound reverence, awe, and respect for the LORD that leads to obedience and humility, rather than mere terror or servile dread. Hezekiah's "fear of the LORD" was a moral and spiritual posture that prompted him to seek God's face, respond positively to prophetic warnings, and lead his people in repentance, demonstrating true wisdom and piety that resulted in divine mercy.
Meaning "to sigh, i.e. breathe strongly; by implication, to be sorry, i.e. (in a favorable sense) to pity, console or (reflexively) rue." When applied to God, as here, this term does not imply a change of mind due to error, regret, or a deviation from His eternal plan. Rather, it signifies a compassionate alteration of His declared course of action in response to genuine human repentance. It highlights God's freedom, His interactive relationship with humanity, and the conditional nature of many of His judgments, which are often intended to prompt a turning back to Him rather than to be an irreversible decree.
Meaning "bad or (as noun) evil (natural or moral); adversity, affliction, bad, calamity." This crucial word appears twice in the verse, carrying distinct but related connotations. In the first instance, "the evil which he had pronounced," it refers to the calamity, disaster, or judgment that God had declared against Judah. In the second instance, "great evil against our souls," it refers to the catastrophic consequences, both physical and spiritual, that the people would bring upon themselves by rejecting God's prophet and His message. It encompasses both divinely sent judgment and humanly incurred disaster, emphasizing the self-inflicted nature of rebellion.
Verse Breakdown
"Did Hezekiah king of Judah and all Judah put him at all to death?"
This opening is a powerful rhetorical question, strategically designed to elicit a resounding "No!" from the audience. The elders are not seeking information but are reminding the present leadership of a well-known historical precedent: King Hezekiah, despite receiving a similarly severe prophecy of destruction from Micah, did not execute the prophet. This question immediately establishes a stark contrast between righteous past leadership and the current murderous intent.
"did he not fear the LORD, and besought the LORD,"
This clause provides the crucial explanation for Hezekiah's different, life-saving response. His actions were rooted in a profound "fear of the LORD"—a reverent awe and respect that led him to humbly "beseech" or earnestly entreat God. This highlights the spiritual posture that averted disaster: not defiance or rejection of the prophetic word, but humble petition and seeking God's favor and mercy.
"and the LORD repented him of the evil which he had pronounced against them?"
This clause reveals the divine response to Hezekiah's and Judah's repentance. Because Hezekiah and the people humbled themselves and turned to God, the Lord, in His compassion and freedom, "repented" (or relented) from the calamity He had threatened. This demonstrates God's willingness to turn from judgment when His people turn from their sin, underscoring His desire for their repentance and restoration.
"Thus might we procure great evil against our souls."
This is the concluding warning and the direct, urgent application of the historical lesson to the present situation. The elders argue that if the current leaders choose to execute Jeremiah, they would not be averting the prophesied "evil" (calamity) but would instead "procure" (bring upon themselves, incur) a "great evil"—a far worse judgment or catastrophe—upon their own "souls" (lives, beings, very existence). It serves as a stark caution against the self-destructive nature of rejecting God's messenger and His word.
Literary Devices
Jeremiah 26:19 is masterfully crafted with several literary devices that amplify its persuasive power and theological depth. The passage opens with a potent Rhetorical Question, "Did Hezekiah king of Judah and all Judah put him at all to death?" This question is not posed to elicit an answer but to compel the audience to acknowledge an undeniable historical truth, thereby setting the stage for the elders' argument. This leads directly into a powerful Historical Parallel or Analogy, drawing a direct comparison between the situation of the prophet Micah and King Hezekiah in the past, and that of Jeremiah and King Jehoiakim in the present. The elders use this past event as a compelling Precedent, arguing that if a righteous king responded with humility and repentance to a similar prophecy, the current king and people should emulate that behavior. A clear Contrast is implicitly drawn between Hezekiah's "fear of the LORD" and the present generation's murderous intent, emphasizing the spiritual difference that leads to divergent outcomes. Finally, the verse culminates in a stark Warning or Admonition, "Thus might we procure great evil against our souls," which serves as a powerful deterrent, highlighting the self-destructive and catastrophic nature of rejecting God's prophet and His divine message.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Jeremiah 26:19 offers profound theological insights into the character of God and His dynamic interaction with humanity. It powerfully underscores God's absolute sovereignty in pronouncing judgment while simultaneously revealing His compassionate nature and His willingness to relent when His people humble themselves and turn from their wicked ways. The passage demonstrates that God's warnings are not arbitrary, irreversible decrees but are often conditional, intended to call for repentance and offering a path to avert disaster. It emphasizes the critical and often perilous role of prophetic ministry as God's primary means of communicating His will and warnings to His people, and the grave, self-inflicted consequences of rejecting those whom He sends. The "fear of the LORD" is presented as the proper and life-giving response to divine revelation, leading to preservation and blessing rather than destruction. This historical example serves as a timeless reminder that human choices—whether to repent and obey or to rebel and reject—have direct and significant implications for divine response, highlighting the intricate principle of divine justice intertwined with human responsibility and the enduring possibility of mercy.
Reflection and Application
Jeremiah 26:19 provides a powerful and enduring lesson for believers today, urging us to cultivate a posture of humility, discernment, and responsiveness to God's word, especially when it challenges our comfort zones, exposes our sin, or confronts our deeply held assumptions. Just as King Hezekiah and the people of Judah averted a pronounced disaster by genuinely fearing the Lord and humbly seeking His favor, we too are called to listen intently to the Spirit's promptings, the truths of Scripture, and the wise counsel of God's messengers, allowing them to shape our lives and priorities. This verse reminds us that repentance is not merely a theological concept or a one-time event, but a continuous, practical, and life-saving act that can turn God's declared judgments or the natural consequences of our actions into expressions of His profound mercy. It also serves as a solemn warning against the pervasive temptation to silence, dismiss, or ignore those who speak uncomfortable truths, whether from the pulpit, through personal conviction, or through the clear, unvarnished teaching of God's infallible Word. To reject God's messengers or His message is to invite "great evil against our souls," hindering our spiritual growth, jeopardizing our well-being, and potentially leading to profound regret and self-inflicted catastrophe. Our call is to discern God's voice, embrace His truth, and respond with a repentant heart, trusting in His compassionate nature to guide us toward abundant life and lasting blessing.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does it mean that "the LORD repented him of the evil"?
The phrase "the LORD repented him of the evil" (Hebrew: nâcham) does not imply that God changed His mind as a human might, regretting a mistake or altering a fixed, unchangeable plan. Instead, when applied to God in the Old Testament, it signifies His compassionate decision to alter His course of action concerning a declared judgment, based on a genuine change in human behavior, specifically repentance and turning back to Him. God's declarations of judgment are often conditional, intended to motivate people to turn from their sin and avert disaster. When Hezekiah and Judah humbled themselves and sought the Lord, God, in His mercy and faithfulness to His covenant, chose not to bring the calamity He had threatened. This highlights God's freedom, His interactive relationship with humanity, and His profound desire for humanity's salvation and repentance, not their destruction, as powerfully articulated in Ezekiel 18:23.
Why did the elders refer to Hezekiah's reign in their defense of Jeremiah?
The elders referred to King Hezekiah's reign because it provided a powerful, undeniable, and highly relevant historical precedent. Hezekiah was a righteous king who, unlike many of his predecessors and successors, responded to a strikingly similar prophecy of destruction from the prophet Micah (see Micah 3:12) with humility and national repentance. Instead of executing Micah for his unpopular message, Hezekiah and the people "feared the LORD and besought the LORD," leading God to "repent him of the evil" He had pronounced against Jerusalem. The elders used this compelling example to argue that executing Jeremiah would be a grave and self-destructive mistake, bringing even greater judgment upon themselves. Conversely, heeding Jeremiah's warning and repenting could lead to divine mercy and the averting of catastrophe, just as it did in Hezekiah's time. It was a desperate and wise plea for the current leadership to choose wisdom, repentance, and life, rather than defiance and self-inflicted destruction.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Jeremiah 26:19, while deeply rooted in Old Testament history and the conditional nature of God's covenant judgments, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate divine response to humanity's rebellion and the perfect fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. The elders' appeal for repentance and God's relenting from judgment points to the very core of the Gospel message. While Hezekiah's repentance averted a specific temporal judgment for Judah, humanity's ultimate "evil against our souls" is sin and its consequence: eternal separation from God. God's ultimate "relenting" from this final, eternal judgment is found not in human effort or partial repentance alone, but supremely and perfectly in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. He is the ultimate Prophet, greater than Jeremiah or Micah, whom the Father sent to speak His final and complete word to humanity (see Hebrews 1:1-2). Unlike the Old Testament prophets who were often rejected and killed, Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, willingly laid down His life, becoming the perfect propitiation for our sins (see 1 John 4:10). Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, God's righteous wrath against sin was fully satisfied, allowing Him to "repent" (in the sense of justly turning away from) the judgment we deserve, not because of our perfect repentance, but because of Christ's perfect obedience and substitutionary sacrifice. Thus, the "great evil against our souls" is overcome by the "great good" of salvation offered freely through faith in Christ, who invites all to repent and believe the good news of the Kingdom (see Mark 1:15). He is the true Hezekiah, whose perfect fear of the Lord and obedience to the Father secured our eternal deliverance.