Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ O Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee? O Judah, what shall I do unto thee? for your goodness is as a morning cloud, and as the early dew it goeth away.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
O Ephraim H669, what shall I do H6213 unto thee? O Judah H3063, what shall I do H6213 unto thee? for your goodness H2617 is as a morning H1242 cloud H6051, and as the early H7925 dew H2919 it goeth away H1980.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"Efrayim, what should I do to you? Y'hudah, what should I do to you? For your 'faithful love' is like a morning cloud, like dew that disappears quickly.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
What shall I do with you, O Ephraim? What shall I do with you, O Judah? For your loyalty is like a morning mist, like the early dew that vanishes.
Ask
American Standard Version
O Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee? O Judah, what shall I do unto thee? for your goodness is as a morning cloud, and as the dew that goeth early away.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“Ephraim, what shall I do to you? Judah, what shall I do to you? For your love is like a morning cloud, and like the dew that disappears early.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
O Ephraim, what shall I doe vnto thee? O Iudah, how shall I intreate thee? for your goodnesse is as a morning cloude, and as the morning dewe it goeth away.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
What do I do to thee, O Ephraim? What do I do to thee, O Judah? Your goodness is as a cloud of the morning, And as dew rising early--going.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Hosea 6:4 captures the Lord's profound lament over the superficial and transient devotion of both the northern kingdom of Israel (Ephraim) and the southern kingdom of Judah. It reveals God's deep disappointment with their inconsistent loyalty, likening their "goodness" or steadfast love to a fleeting morning cloud and an early dew that quickly vanishes, underscoring their failure to maintain genuine covenant faithfulness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows a passage (Hosea 6:1-3) where the people express a superficial desire to return to the Lord, uttering words of repentance that lack true heart change. Their declaration, "Come, and let us return unto the Lord: for he hath torn, and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up," sounds hopeful but is revealed by God's subsequent lament in Hosea 6:4 to be hollow. They anticipated immediate restoration based on a mere outward turning, failing to grasp the depth of genuine repentance and the steadfast love God truly desired. The entire book of Hosea consistently highlights Israel's spiritual adultery and unfaithfulness, often likening their relationship with God to a broken marriage covenant, and warns of the severe consequences of their persistent rebellion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Hosea prophesied during a turbulent period in both Israel (Ephraim) and Judah, primarily in the 8th century BCE. The northern kingdom of Israel was particularly unstable, marked by frequent changes in kingship, political assassinations, and a deep-seated idolatry that permeated all levels of society. Judah, though more stable, also exhibited periods of unfaithfulness. The agricultural imagery of "morning cloud" and "early dew" would have resonated powerfully with an agrarian society dependent on consistent rain and moisture for crops. Morning dew was common but quickly evaporated under the rising sun, and morning clouds often dissipated without bringing rain, making them apt metaphors for something that appears promising but delivers nothing substantial or lasting. This context highlights the stark contrast between God's steadfast covenant love and His people's fleeting commitment.
  • Key Themes: Hosea 6:4 contributes significantly to several major themes found throughout the book of Hosea. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Superficial Piety, where outward expressions of devotion or fleeting emotional responses are contrasted with the deep, enduring covenant loyalty God desires. The imagery of the "morning cloud" and "early dew" perfectly encapsulates a goodness that appears promising but quickly vanishes, lacking depth and consistency, a theme echoed in God's later declaration that He desires steadfast love (chesed) more than sacrifice. Secondly, the rhetorical question, "O Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee? O Judah, what shall I do unto thee?" expresses profound Divine Disappointment and exasperation. It is a lament from a heartbroken God, highlighting His desire for a genuine, lasting relationship that their actions continually denied Him, a sentiment also seen in Isaiah 1:2-4. Finally, the verse underscores the pervasive theme of Covenant Unfaithfulness. Despite God's sustained efforts, patience, and unwavering love, both Israel and Judah repeatedly turned away, their supposed commitment proving unreliable and transient, leading to the divine judgment and restoration cycle that defines much of Hosea 1.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • goodness (Hebrew, chêçêd', H2617): While often translated as "mercy," "kindness," or "lovingkindness" when referring to God's character, here it describes the people's own loyalty, devotion, or steadfast love towards God. The irony is stark: the very quality God desires from them – a steadfast, covenantal love – is precisely what is fleeting and unreliable in their actions. This highlights the stark contrast with God's own unwavering chêçêd.
  • morning (Hebrew, bôqer', H1242): This word refers to the dawn or early morning. In the context of "morning cloud" and "early dew," it emphasizes the ephemeral nature of the phenomenon. These are things that appear at the very beginning of the day but are quickly gone as the sun rises, reinforcing the transient quality of Israel and Judah's devotion.
  • goeth away (Hebrew, hâlak', H1980): A primitive root meaning "to walk" or "to go," but used in a wide variety of applications, literally and figuratively. Here, it signifies the act of vanishing, departing, or dissipating. It vividly portrays the rapid disappearance of their "goodness," underscoring its lack of endurance and substance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "O Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee? O Judah, what shall I do unto thee?": This is a poignant, rhetorical cry from God, expressing His deep anguish, frustration, and exasperation with His people. "Ephraim" represents the northern kingdom of Israel, and "Judah" the southern kingdom. God's question is not born of ignorance or helplessness, but of profound disappointment and a sense of having exhausted all means of bringing them to true repentance. It conveys His longing for their genuine return and His sorrow over their persistent unfaithfulness.
  • "for your goodness [is] as a morning cloud,": The conjunction "for" introduces the reason for God's lament. Their "goodness" (Hebrew: chêçêd, referring to their loyalty, devotion, or steadfast love towards God) is compared to a "morning cloud." This simile vividly portrays something that appears promising and substantial at first light but quickly dissipates without yielding any lasting benefit, such as rain. It signifies a superficial, transient commitment.
  • "and as the early dew it goeth away.": This second simile reinforces the first, emphasizing the fleeting nature of their devotion. "Early dew" is a common phenomenon in the ancient Near East, providing temporary moisture but evaporating rapidly as the sun rises. Just as the dew offers only momentary refreshment before vanishing, so too their "goodness" is not rooted in deep conviction or consistent obedience, but is merely a temporary impulse that quickly disappears.

Literary Devices

Hosea 6:4 is rich in literary devices that amplify its message of divine lament and human transience. The most prominent is the Rhetorical Question, "O Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee? O Judah, what shall I do unto thee?" This is not a question seeking an answer, but rather an expression of profound sorrow, exasperation, and a sense of having exhausted all options in dealing with His unfaithful people. It highlights God's deep emotional investment and His heartbreak over their persistent rebellion. Secondly, the verse employs powerful Simile by comparing the people's "goodness" to "a morning cloud" and "the early dew." These comparisons are highly effective, drawing on common natural phenomena to illustrate the fleeting, insubstantial, and unreliable nature of their devotion. The imagery is vivid and easily understood by an agrarian society, emphasizing that their commitment, though perhaps present for a brief moment, lacks the depth and endurance necessary for a true covenant relationship. The use of these natural elements also contributes to the overall Imagery of the passage, painting a clear picture of something that appears but quickly vanishes, underscoring the ephemeral quality of their spiritual state.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Hosea 6:4 profoundly reveals God's heart: His desire for genuine, consistent, and steadfast love from His people, rather than fleeting displays of piety or superficial repentance. It underscores a foundational biblical truth that God values the internal disposition of the heart—true loyalty and devotion (the essence of chesed)—over outward ritual or temporary emotional responses. This divine preference is a recurring theme throughout Scripture, challenging believers to examine the sincerity and longevity of their faith. God's lament here serves as a timeless reminder that while He is patient and merciful, He ultimately seeks a transformed heart that yields consistent obedience and a deep, abiding relationship, not merely transient gestures of "goodness" that vanish like morning mist.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Hosea 6:4 serves as a powerful mirror for contemporary believers, prompting us to critically examine the sincerity and longevity of our own faith and devotion. Is our "goodness" or commitment to God merely a fleeting emotional response, perhaps stirred by a moving sermon or a personal crisis, only to dissipate when life's pressures return or spiritual fervor wanes? Or is it rooted in a deep, abiding relationship with Christ that produces consistent obedience, steadfast love, and enduring faithfulness? God seeks more than outward displays of piety or temporary zeal; He desires a transformed heart that genuinely seeks Him daily, demonstrating a love that withstands the tests of time and temptation. Our relationship with God should be characterized by a steadfast love and faithfulness that mirrors the unwavering nature of His own hesed towards us, moving beyond mere ritual to a life of genuine, consistent devotion.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might my "goodness" or devotion to God be more like a "morning cloud" or "early dew" – present one moment, gone the next?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a more consistent and deeply rooted relationship with God, moving beyond superficial expressions of faith?
  • How does God's lament in Hosea 6:4 challenge my understanding of genuine repentance and what it means to truly "return to the Lord"?

FAQ

What does "goodness" mean in Hosea 6:4, and why is it described as fleeting?

Answer: In Hosea 6:4, the Hebrew word translated "goodness" is chesed (חֶסֶד). While often rendered as "mercy" or "lovingkindness" when describing God's character, here it refers to the people's own loyalty, devotion, or steadfast love towards God. It's the covenant faithfulness that God expects from His people. It is described as fleeting, like "a morning cloud" and "early dew," because their commitment was inconsistent, superficial, and lacked endurance. They might express a desire to return to God (as in Hosea 6:1-3), but their actions and subsequent turning away demonstrated that this "goodness" was not deeply rooted or sustained, quickly vanishing under the pressures of life or the allure of idolatry. This highlights God's deep disappointment with their lack of genuine, lasting commitment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hosea 6:4, with its lament over Israel and Judah's fleeting goodness, points powerfully to the ultimate and perfect fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. The "goodness" (or chesed, steadfast love) that the people of God consistently failed to maintain is perfectly embodied in the Person of Jesus. He alone lived a life of unwavering obedience and perfect chesed towards God and humanity, never wavering in His commitment, unlike the "morning cloud" or "early dew" of Israel's devotion. Christ's sacrifice on the cross was the ultimate demonstration of God's own steadfast love, fulfilling the very chesed that God desired from His people but which they could not provide (John 3:16). Through faith in Him, believers are not called to produce a fleeting "goodness" of their own, but are clothed in His perfect righteousness (2 Corinthians 5:21). Moreover, the New Covenant, inaugurated by Christ's blood, promises a transformed heart, where God's law is written not on stone tablets, but on the heart itself (Jeremiah 31:33), enabling a genuine and enduring chesed that is empowered by the Holy Spirit, ensuring that our walk with God is not fleeting but steadfast, reflecting the very character of our Savior (Romans 8:3-4).

Copy as

Commentary on Hosea 6 verses 4–11

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Two things, two evil things, both Judah and Ephraim are here charged with, and justly accused of: -

I. That they were not firm to their own convictions, but were unsteady, unstable as water, Hos 6:4, Hos 6:5. O Ephraim! what shall I do unto thee? O Judah! what shall I do unto thee? This is a strange expression. Can Infinite Wisdom be at a loss what to do? Can it be nonplussed, or put upon taking new measures? By no means; but God speaks after the manner of men, to show how absurd and unreasonable they were, and how just his proceedings against them were. Let them not complain of him as harsh and severe in tearing them, and smiting them, as he has done; for what else should he do? What other course could he take with them? God had tried various methods with them (What could have been done more to his vineyard than he had done? Isa 5:4), and very loth he was to let things go to extremity; he reasons with himself (as Hos 11:9), How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? God would have done them good, but they were not qualified for it: "What shall I do unto thee? What else can I do but cast thee off, when I cannot in honour save thee?" Note, God never destroys sinners till he sees there is no other way with them. See here, 1. What their conduct was towards God: Their goodness, or kindness, was as the morning cloud. Some understand it of their kindness to themselves and their own souls, in their repentance; it is indeed mercy to ourselves to repent of our sins, but they soon retracted that kindness to themselves, undid it again, and wronged their own souls as much as ever. But it is rather to be taken for their piety and religion; what good appeared in them sometimes, it soon vanished and disappeared again, as the morning cloud and the early dew. Such was the goodness of Israel in Jehu's time, and of Judah in Hezekiah's and Josiah's time; it was soon gone. In time of drought the morning-cloud promises rain, and the early dew is some present refreshment to the earth; but the cloud is dispersed (and hypocrites are compared to clouds without water, Jde 1:12) and the dew does not soak into the ground, but is drawn back again into the air, and the earth is parched still. What shall he do with them? Shall he accept their goodness? No, for it passes away; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that which does not continue can scarcely be said to be done. Note, That goodness will never be either pleasing to God or profitable to ourselves which is as the morning cloud and the early dew. When men promise fair and do not perform, when they begin well in religion and do not hold on, when they leave their first love and their first works, or, though they do not quite cast off religion, are yet unsteady, uneven, and inconstant in it, then is their goodness as the morning cloud and the early dew. 2. What course God had taken with them (Hos 6:5): "Therefore, because they were so rough and ill-shapen, I have hewn them by the prophets, as timber or stone is hewn for use; I have slain them by the words of my mouth." What the prophets did was done by the word of God in their mouths, which never returned void. By it they thought themselves slain, were ready to say that the prophets killed them, or cut them to the heart when they dealt faithfully with them. (1.) The prophets hewed them by convictions of sin, endeavouring to cut off their transgressions from them. They were uneven in religion (Hos 6:4), therefore God hewed them. The hearts of sinners are not only as stone, but as rough stone, which requires a great deal of pains to bring it into shape, or as knotty timber, that is not squared without a great deal of difficulty; ministers' work is to hew them, and God by the minister hews them, for with the froward will he show himself froward. And there are those whom ministers must rebuke sharply; every word should cut, and though the chips fly in the face of the workman, though the reproved fly in the face of the reprover and reckon him an enemy because he tells the truth, yet he goes on with his work. (2.) They slew them by the denunciations of wrath, foretelling that they should be slain, as Ezekiel is said to destroy the city when he prophesied of the destruction of it, Eze 43:3. And God accomplished that which was foretold: "I have slain them by my judgments, according to the words of my mouth." Note, The word of God will be the death either of the sin or of the sinner, a savour either of life unto life or of death unto death. Some read it, "I have hewn the prophets, and slain them by the words of my mouth, that is, I have employed them in laborious service for the people's good, which has wasted their strength; they have spent themselves, and hews away all their spirits, in their work, and in hazardous service, which has cost many of them their lives." Note, Ministers are the tools which God makes use of in working upon people; and, though with many they labour in vain, yet God will reckon for the wearing out of his tools. (3.) God was hereby justified in the severest proceedings against them afterwards. His prophets had taken a great deal of pains with them, had admonished them of their sin and warned them of their danger, but the means used had not the desired effect; some good impressions perhaps were made for the present, but they wore off, and passed away as the morning cloud, and now they cannot charge God with severity if he bring upon them the miseries threatened. The prophet turns to him and acknowledges, Thy judgments are as the light that goes forth, evidently just and righteous. Note, Though sinners be not reclaimed by the pains that ministers take with them, yet thereby God will be justified when he speaks and clear when he judges. See Mat 11:17-19.

II. That they were not faithful to God's covenant with them, Hos 6:6, Hos 6:7. Here observe,

1.What the covenant was that God made with them, and upon what terms they should obtain his favour and be accepted of him (Hos 6:6): I desired mercy and not sacrifice (that is, rather than sacrifice), and insisted upon the knowledge of God more than upon burnt-offerings. Mercy here is the same word which in Hos 6:4 is rendered goodness - chesed - piety, sanctity; it is put for all practical religion; it is the same with charity in the New Testament, the reigning love of God and our neighbour, and this accompanied with and flowing from the knowledge of God, as he has revealed himself in his word, a firm belief that he is, and is the rewarder of those that diligently seek him, a good affection to divine things guided by a good judgment, which cannot but produce a very good conversation; this is that which God by his covenant requires, and not sacrifice and offering. This is fully explained, Jer 7:22, Jer 7:23. I spoke not to your fathers concerning burnt-offerings (that was the smallest of the matters I spoke to them of, and on which the least stress was laid), but this I said, Obey my voice, Mic 6:6-8. To love God and our neighbour is better than all burnt offering and sacrifice, Mar 12:33; Psa 51:16, Psa 51:17. Not but that sacrifice and offering were required, and to be paid, and had their use, and, when they were accompanied with mercy and the knowledge of God, were acceptable to him, but, without them, God regarded them not, he despised them, Isa 1:10, Isa 1:11. Perhaps this is mentioned here to show a difference between the God whom they deserted and the gods whom they went over to. The true God aimed at nothing but that they should be good men, and live good lives for their own good, and the ceremony of honouring him with sacrifices was one of the smallest matters of his law; whereas the false gods required that only; let their priests and altars be regaled with sacrifices and offerings, and the people might live as they listed. What fools were those then that left a God who aimed at giving his worshippers a new nature, for gods who aimed at nothing but making themselves a new name! It is mentioned likewise to show that God's controversy with them was not for the omission of sacrifices (I will not reprove thee for them, Psa 50:8), but because there was no justice, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God, among them (Hos 4:1), and to teach us all that the power of godliness is the main thing God looks at and requires, and without it the form of godliness is of no avail. Serious piety in the heart and life is the one thing needful, and, separate from that, the performances of devotion, though ever so plausible, ever so costly, are of no account. Our Saviour quotes this to show that moral duties are to be preferred before rituals whenever they come in competition, and to justify himself in eating with publicans and sinners, because it was in mercy to the souls of men, and in healing on the sabbath day, because it was in mercy to the bodies of men, to which the ceremony of singularity in eating and the sabbath-rest must give way, Mat 9:13; Mat 12:7.

2.How little they had regarded this covenant, though it was so well ordered in all things, though they, and not God, would be the gainers by it. See here what came of it.

(1.)In general, they broke with God, and proved unfaithful; there were good things committed to them to keep, the jewels of mercy and piety, and the knowledge of God, in the cabinet of sacrifice and burnt-offering, but they betrayed their trust, kept the cabinet, but pawned the jewels for the gratification of a base lust, and this is that for which God has justly a quarrel with them (Hos 6:7): They, like men, have transgressed the covenant, that covenant which God made with them; they have broken the conditions of it, and so forfeited the benefit of it. By casting off mercy and the knowledge of God, and other instances of disobedience, [1.] They had contracted the guilt of perjury and covenant-breaking; they were like men that transgress a covenant by which they had solemnly bound themselves, which is a thing that all the world cries out shame on; men that have done so deserve not again to be valued, or trusted, or dealt with. "There, in that thing, they have dealt treacherously against me; they have been perfidious, base, and false children, in whom is no faith, though I depended upon their being children that would not lie." [2.] In this they had but acted like themselves, like men, who are generally false and fickle, and in whose nature (their corrupt nature) it is to deal treacherously; all men are liars, and they are like the rest of that degenerate race, all gone aside, Psa 14:2, Psa 14:3. They have transgressed the covenant like men (like the Gentiles that transgressed the covenant of nature), like mean men (the word here used is sometimes put for men of low degree); they have dealt deceitfully, like base men that have no sense of honour. [3.] Herein they trod in the steps of our first parents: They, like Adam, have transgressed the covenant (so it might very well be read); as he transgressed the covenant of innocency, so they transgressed the covenant of grace, so treacherously, so foolishly; there in paradise he violated his engagements to God, and there in Canaan, another paradise, they violated their engagements. And by their treacherous dealing they, like Adam, have ruined themselves and theirs. Note, Sin is so much the worse the more there is in it of the similitude of Adam's transgression, Rom 5:14. [4.] Low thoughts of God and of his authority and favour were at the bottom of all this; for so some read it: They have transgressed the covenant, as of a man, as if it had been but the covenant of a man, that stood upon even ground with them, as if the commands of the covenant were but like those of a man like themselves, and the kindness conveyed by it no more valuable than that of a man. There is something sacred and binding in a man's covenant (as the apostle shows, Gal 3:15), but much more in the covenant of God, which yet they made small account of; and there in that covenant they dealt treacherously, promised fair, but performed nothing. Dealing treacherously with God is here called dealing treacherously against him, for it is both an affront and an opposition. Deserters are traitors, and will be so treated; the revolting heart is a rebellious heart.

(2.)Some particular instances of their treachery are here given: There they dealt treacherously, that is, in the places hereafter named [1.] Look on the other side Jordan, to the country which lay most exposed to the insults of the neighbouring nations, and where therefore the people were concerned to keep themselves under the divine protection, and yet there you will find the most daring provocations of the divine Majesty, Hos 6:8. Gilead, which lay in the lot of Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh, was a city of the workers of iniquity. Wickedness was the trade that was driven there; the country was called Gilead, but it was all called a city, because they were all as it were incorporated in one society of rebels against God. Or (as most think) Ramoth Gilead is the city here meant, one of the three cities of refuge on the other side Jordan, and a Levites' city; the inhabitants of it, though of the sacred tribe, were workers of iniquity, contrived it, and practised it. Note, It is bad indeed when a Levites' city is a city of those that work iniquity, when those that are to preach good doctrine live bad lives. Particularly it is polluted with blood, as if that were a sin which the wicked Levites were in a special manner guilty of. In popish countries the clergy are observed to be the most bloody persecutors. Or, as it was a city of refuge, by abusing the power it had to judge of murders it became polluted with blood. They would, for a bribe, protect those that were guilty of wilful murder, whom they ought to have put to death, and would deliver those to the avenger of blood who were guilty but of chance-medley, if they were poor and had nothing to give them; and both these ways they were polluted with blood. Note, Blood defiles the land where it is shed, and where no inquisition is made or no vengeance taken for it. See how the best institutions, that are ever so well designed to keep the balance even between justice and mercy, are capable of being abused and perverted to the manifest prejudice and violation of both. [2.] Look among those whose business it was to minister in holy things, and they were as bad as the worst and as vile as the vilest (Hos 6:9): The company of priests are so, not here and there one that is the scandal of his order, but the whole order and body of them, the priests go all one way by consent, with one shoulder (as the word is), one and all; and they make one another worse, more daring, and fierce, and impudent, in sin, more crafty and more cruel. A company of priests will say and do that in conspiracy which none of them would dare to say or do singly. The companies of priests were as troops of robbers, as banditti, or gangs of highwaymen, that cut men's throats to get their money. First, They were cruel and blood-thirsty. They murder those that they have a pique against, or that stand in their way; nothing less will satisfy them. Secondly, They were cunning. They laid wait for men, that they might have a fair opportunity to compass their mischievous malicious designs; thus the company of priests laid wait for Christ to take him, saying, Not on the feast-day. Thirdly, They were concurring as one man: They murder in the way; in the highway, where travellers should be safe, there they murder by consent, aiding and abetting one another in it. See how unanimous wicked people are in doing mischief; and should not good people be so then in doing good? They murder in the way to Shechem (so the margin reads it, as a proper name) such as were going to Jerusalem (for that way Shechem lay) to worship. Or in the way to Shechem (some think) means in the same manner that their father Levi, with Simeon his brother, murdered the Shechemites (Gen. 34), by fraud and deceit; and some understand it of their destroying the souls of men by drawing them to sin. Fourthly, They did it with contrivance: They commit lewdness; the word signifies such wickedness as is committed with deliberation, and of malice prepense, as we say. The more there is of device and design in sin the worse it is. [3.] Look into the body of the people, take a view of the whole house of Israel, and they are all alike (Hos 6:10): I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel, and, though it be ever so artfully managed, God discovers it, and will discover it to them; and who can deny that which God himself says that he has seen? There is the whoredom of Ephraim, both corporal and spiritual whoredom; there it is too plain to be denied. Note, The sin of sinners, especially sinners of the house of Israel, has enough in it to make them tremble, for it is a horrible thing, it is amazing, and it is threatening, enough to make them blush, for Israel is thereby defiled and rendered odious in the sight of God. [4.] Look into Judah, and you find them sharing with Israel (Hos 6:11): Also, O Judah! he has set a harvest for thee; thou must be reckoned with as well as Ephraim; thou art ripe for destruction too, and the time, even the set time, of thy destruction is hastening on, when thou that hast ploughed iniquity, and sown wickedness, shalt reap the same. The general judgment is compared to a harvest (Mat 13:39), so are particular judgments, Joe 3:13; Rev 14:15. I have appointed a time to call thee to account, even when I returned the captivity of my people, that is, when those captives of Judah which were taken by the men of Israel were restored, in obedience to the command of God sent them by Oded the prophet, Ch2 28:8-15. When God spared them that time he set them a harvest, that is, he designed to reckon with them another time for all together. Note, Preservations from present judgments, if a good use be not made of them, are but reservations for greater judgments.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–11. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Hosea 6:4-5
"What shall I do to you, Ephraim? What shall I do to you, Judah? Your mercy is like the morning clouds and like the dew that goes away early: therefore have I hewed them by the prophets; I have slain them by the words of my mouth: and thy judgments shall go forth as the light." LXX: "What shall I do to you, Ephraim? What shall I do to you, Judah? Your mercy is like a morning cloud, and like dew that passes away early: therefore I have hewed your prophets, I have killed them with the words of my mouth, and your judgment shall come forth like the light." When He says, 'What shall I do to thee, Ephraim? What shall I do to thee, Juda?,' He shows the affection of a parent for his lost children, according to what we read in Isaiah: 'What is there that I ought to have done more to my vineyard, that I have not done to it?' (Isaiah 5:4) And in Micah: "My people, what have I done to you, or how have I caused trouble to you? Answer me; because I brought you out of the land of Egypt, I freed you from the house of slaves, and I sent Moses, Aaron, and Miriam before your face" (Micah 6:2, 4). Therefore, what shall I do to you, Ephraim, what shall I do to you, Judah? Your mercy, with which I have always shown mercy to you, has passed like the morning clouds, and like the morning dew that dries up when the sun rises. For now captivity is near, I already see you being led captive into the Assyrians and chained to the Babylonians. I grieved for you in the prophets and threatened you with terrible words; I brandished a scalpel, fire and branding irons, so that you who despised my clemency might fear my offence, and I might kill the careless with the words of my mouth, punishing sinners beforehand with the terror of words before captivity should approach. And I did all this so that the truth of the judgement by which I am about to judge you might be made manifest and that no one might doubt that you have suffered what you have deserved. For what it is, 'I have grieved for the prophets,' the Seventy translated, 'I have cut down your prophets,' understanding that they had killed false prophets themselves, to the Lord: so that those who were the cause of error, promising prosperity, would be killed and turned into an opportunity for salvation. And the sense is: Lest you should say, we believed in the prophets, even we killed them: so that every occasion of sin might be taken away from you. We read in the book of Kings that 450 prophets of Baal were killed under Elijah (3 Kings xviii), and another innumerable multitude under Jehu (4 Kings x), who overthrew the house of Ahab. We believe that the same things were said both to heretics and to the true man Judas, who was about to suffer similar things, so that the Lord may provoke them to mercy, and may desire to return to salvation. But those men who pursue the delights and refreshments of this world like a cloud and dew that quickly pass away, of whom it is said in the Gospel: "Thou fool, this night do they require thy soul of thee: and whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?" (Luke 12:20). And that richly adorned man, who despised Lazarus lying before his doors (Luke 16), knew that all that he had enjoyed had passed away like a cloud or a dewdrop. But God always destroys the prophets of the heretics, while He threatens them with eternal punishments, takes away true life from them, and abandons them to the death of their crimes. However, let us love that cloud which is eternal, and which protects us from the heat of this world, under which sitting the Lord came into Egypt, and broke all the idols of the Egyptians. Let us love that dew about which Moses speaks: "Let my doctrine drop as the rain" (Deut. XXXII, 2). And about which Isaiah says: "Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust: for thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast forth the dead" (Isai. XXVI, 19, sec. LXX). There are some who think that the prophets who were truly slain (("Al." holy men)) were given up to the enemies because of the sin of the people.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Hosea 6:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.