Hebrews 8:9
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- οὐounotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- κατὰkataaccording toG2596PREPPreposition
- τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
- διαθήκηνdiathēkēncovenantG1242N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
- ἣνhēnthatG3739R-ASFRelative pronoun Accusative Singular Feminine
- ἐποίησαepoiēsaI madeG4160V-AAI-1SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 1st Singular
- τοῖςtoistheG3588T-DPMDefinite article Dative Plural Masculine
- πατράσινpatrasinwith fathersG3962N-DPMNoun Dative Plural Masculine
- αὐτῶνautōnof themG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
- ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
- ἡμέρᾳhēmera[the] dayG2250N-DSFNoun Dative Singular Feminine
- ἐπιλαβομένουepilabomenouof having taken hold ofG1949V-2ADP-GSMVerb 2nd Aorist Middle Deponent Participle Genitive Singular Masculine
- μουmouby MeG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
- τῆςtēstheG3588T-GSFDefinite article Genitive Singular Feminine
- χειρὸςcheiroshandG5495N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
- αὐτῶνautōnof themG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
- ἐξαγαγεῖνexagageinto leadG1806V-2AANVerb 2nd Aorist Active Infinitive
- αὐτοὺςautousthemG846P-APMPersonal pronoun Accusative Plural Masculine
- ἐκekout ofG1537PREPPreposition
- γῆςgēs[the] landG1093N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
- ΑἰγύπτουAiguptouof EgyptG125N-GSF-LNoun Genitive Singular Feminine Location
- ὅτιhotibecauseG3754CONJConjunction
- αὐτοὶautoithey themselvesG846P-NPMPersonal pronoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- οὐκouknotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- ἐνέμεινανenemeinandid continueG1696V-AAI-3PVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Plural
- ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
- τῇtēatheG3588T-DSFDefinite article Dative Singular Feminine
- διαθήκῃdiathēkēcovenantG1242N-DSFNoun Dative Singular Feminine
- μουmouof MineG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
- κἀγὼkagōand I myselfG2532P-1NS + G2532=CONJ
- ἠμέλησαēmelēsadisregardedG272V-AAI-1SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 1st Singular
- αὐτῶνautōnthemG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
- λέγειlegeisaysG3004V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- κύριοςkurios[the] LordG2962N-NSM-TNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Hebrews 8:6–13. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In this part of the chapter, the apostle illustrates and confirms the superior excellency of the priesthood of Christ above that of Aaron, from the excellency of that covenant, or that dispensation of the covenant of grace, of which Christ was the Mediator (Hebrews 8:6): his ministry is more excellent, by how much he is the Mediator of a better covenant. The body and soul too of all divinity (as some observe) consist very much in rightly distinguishing between the two covenants - the covenant of works and the covenant of grace; and between the two dispensations of the covenant of grace - that under the Old Testament and that under the New. Now observe,
I.What is here said of the old covenant, or rather of the old dispensation of the covenant of grace: of this it is said,
1.That it was made with the fathers of the Jewish nation at mount Sinai (Hebrews 8:9), and Moses was the Mediator of that covenant, when God took them by the hand, to lead them out of the land of Egypt, which intimates the great affection, condescension, and tender care of God towards them.
2.That this covenant was not found faultless (Hebrews 8:7, Hebrews 8:8); it was a dispensation of darkness and dread, tending to bondage, and only a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ; it was perfect in its kind, and fitted to answer its end, but very imperfect in comparison of the gospel.
3.That it was not sure or stedfast; for the Jews continued not in that covenant, and the Lord regarded them not, Hebrews 8:9. They dealt ungratefully with their God, and cruelly with themselves, and fell under God's displeasure. God will regard those who remain in his covenant, but will reject those who cast away his yoke from them.
4.That it is decayed, grown old, and vanisheth away, Hebrews 8:13. It is antiquated, canceled, out of date, of no more use in gospel times than candles are when the sun has risen. Some think the covenant of peculiarity did not quite decay till the destruction of Jerusalem, though it was forfeited at the death of Christ, and was made old, and was now to vanish and perish, and the Levitical priesthood vanished with it.
II.What is here said of the New Testament dispensation, to prove the superior excellency of Christ's ministry. It is said,
1.That it is a better covenant (Hebrews 8:6), a more clear and comfortable dispensation and discovery of the grace of God to sinners, bringing in holy light and liberty to the soul. It is without fault, well ordered in all things. It requires nothing but what it promises grace to perform. It accepts of godly sincerity, accounting it gospel perfection. Every transgression does not turn us out of covenant; all is put into a good and safe hand.
2.That it is established upon better promises, more clear and express, more spiritual, more absolute. The promises of spiritual and eternal blessings are in this covenant positive and absolute; the promises of temporal blessings are with a wise and kind proviso, as far as shall be for God's glory and his people's good. This covenant contains in it promises of assistance and acceptance in duty, promises of progress and perseverance in grace and holiness, of bliss and glory in heaven, which were more obscurely shadowed forth by the promises of the land of Canaan, a type of heaven.
3.It is a new covenant, even that new covenant that God long ago declared he would make with the house of Israel, that is, all the Israel of God; this was promised in Jeremiah 31:31, Jeremiah 31:32, and accomplished in Christ. This will always be a new covenant, in which all who truly take hold of it shall be always found preserved by the power of God. It is God's covenant; his mercy, love, and grace moved for it; his wisdom devised it; his Son purchased it; his wisdom devised it; his Son purchased it; his Spirit brings souls into it, and builds them up in it.
4.The articles of this covenant are very extraordinary, which are sealed between God and his people by baptism and the Lord's supper; whereby they bind themselves to their part, and God assures them he will do his part; and his is the main and principal part, on which his people depend for grace and strength to do theirs. Here,
(1.)God articles with his people that he will put his laws into their minds and write them in their hearts, Hebrews 8:10. He once wrote his laws to them, now he will write his laws in them; that is, he will give them understanding to know and to believe his law; he will give them memories to retain them; he will give them hearts to love them and consciences to recognize them; he will give them courage to profess them and power to put them in practice; the whole habit and frame of their souls shall be a table and transcript of the law of God. This is the foundation of the covenant; and, when this is laid, duty will be done wisely, sincerely, readily, easily, resolutely, constantly, and comfortably.
(2.)He articles with them to take them into a near and very honourable relation to himself.
[1.]He will be to them a God; that is, he will be all that to them, and do all that for them, that God can be and do. Nothing more can be said in a thousand volumes than is comprehended in these few words: I will be a God to them.
[2.]They shall be to him a people, to love, honour, observe, and obey him in all things; complying with his cautions, conforming to his commands, comporting with his providences, copying out his example, taking complacency in his favour. This those must do and will do who have God for their God; this they are bound to do as their part of the contract; this they shall do, for God will enable them to do it, as an evidence that he is their God and that they are his people; for it is God himself who first founds the relation, and then fills it up with grace suitable and sufficient, and helps them in their measure to fill it up with love and duty; so that God engages both for himself and them.
(3.)He articles with them that they shall grow more and more acquainted with their God (Hebrews 8:11): They shall all know me from the least to the greatest, insomuch that there shall not be so much need of one neighbour teaching another the knowledge of God. Here observe,
[1.]In the want of better instruction, one neighbour should be teaching another to know the Lord, as they have ability and opportunity for it.
[2.]This private instruction shall not be so necessary under the New Testament as it was under the Old. The old dispensation was shadowy, dark, ritual, and less understood; their priests preached but seldom, and but a few at a time, and the Spirit of God was more sparingly given out. But under the new dispensation there shall be such abundance of public qualified preachers of the gospel, and dispensers of ordinances statedly in the solemn assemblies, and so great a flocking to them, as doves to their windows, and such a plentiful effusion of the Spirit of God to make the ministration of the gospel effectual, that there shall be a mighty increase and spreading of Christian knowledge in persons of all sorts, of each sex, and of all ages. O that this promise might be fulfilled in our days, that the hand of God may be with his ministers, that a great number may believe and be turned to the Lord!
(4.)God articles with them about the pardon of their sins, as what always accompanies the true knowledge of God (Hebrews 8:12): For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, etc. Observe,
[1.]The freeness of this pardon. It does not result from merit in man, but from mercy in God; he pardons for his own name's sake.
[2.]The fullness of this pardon; it extends to their unrighteousness, sins, and iniquities; to all kinds of sin, to sins highly aggravated.
[3.]The fixedness of this pardon. It is so final and so fixed that God will remember their sins no more; he will not recall his pardon; he will not only forgive their sins, but forget them, treat them as if he had forgotten them. This pardoning mercy is connected with all other spiritual mercies. Unpardoned sin prevents mercy, and pulls down judgments; but the pardon of sin prevents judgment, and opens a wide door to all spiritual blessings; it is the effect of that mercy that is from everlasting, and the earnest of that mercy that shall be to everlasting. This is the excellency of the new dispensation, and these are the articles of it; and therefore we have no reason to repine, but great reason to rejoice that the former dispensation is antiquated and has vanished away.
Historical interpretation
Six Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
“It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.” Both in the verse before us, then, and throughout, does he ascribe the word better to the Lord, who is better and other than originated things. For better is the sacrifice through him, better the hope in him and also the promises through him, not merely as great compared with small, but the one differing from the other in nature, because he who conducts this economy, is better than things originated.
"But finding fault with them, He saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt: because they continued not in My covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord."
Yea, verily. And whence does it appear that the first Covenant came to an end? He showed it indeed also from the Priest, but now he shows more clearly by express words that it has been cast out.
But how is it "upon better promises"? For how, tell me, can earth and heaven be equal? But do thou consider, how he speaks of promises there in that other covenant also, that thou mayest not bring this charge against it. For there also, he says "a better hope, by which we draw nigh unto God" (Heb. vii. 19), showing that a Hope was there also; and in this place "better promises," hinting that there also He had made promises.
But inasmuch as they were forever making objections, he says, "Behold! the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah." He is not speaking of any old Covenant: for, that they might not assert this, he determined the time also. Thus he did not say simply, "according to the covenant which I made with their fathers," lest thou shouldest say it was the one made with Abraham, or that with Noah: but he declares what covenant it was, "not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers" in the Exodus. Wherefore he added also, "in the day that I took them by the hand, to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in My covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord." Thou seest that the evils begin first from ourselves ("they" themselves first, saith he, "continued not in the covenant") and the negligence is from ourselves, but the good things from Him; I mean the acts of bounty. He here introduces, as it were, an apology showing the cause why He forsakes them.
Prophetic utterances are of three kinds: (1) some relating to the earthly Jerusalem; (2) some to the heavenly Jerusalem; (3) and some to both simultaneously. I think it proper to prove what I say by examples. The prophet Nathan was sent to convict King David of heinous sin and predict what future evils would happen to him because of his sin. Who can question that this pertains to the earthly city? There are other instances, sometimes addressed to the public at large for their safety and benefit, and sometimes addressed to someone in private who merited an utterance from God in order to know in advance about some event to guide his temporal life.The following prophecy, however, without a doubt references the heavenly Jerusalem. "Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, that I will make for the house of Israel, and for the house of Judah, a new testament: not according to the testament that I settled for their fathers in the day when I laid hold of their hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my testament, and I regarded them not, says the Lord. For this is the testament that I will make for the house of Israel: after those days, says the Lord, I will give my laws in their mind, and will write them upon their hearts, and I will see to them; and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people." Here, God himself is Jerusalem's reward. Its chief and entire good is to possess him and to be possessed by him.
Both cities are indicated when the city of God is called Jerusalem and when it is prophesied that the house of God shall one day be in Jerusalem. This prophecy seems to be fulfilled when King Solomon builds that most noble temple. For these things both happened in the earthly Jerusalem, as history shows, and were types of the heavenly Jerusalem. This kind of prophecy, as it were, blending both the others in the ancient canonical books devoted to historical narratives, is very common. It has exercised and continues to exercise greatly the talents of those who search holy Scripture.
[The Lord] ascended into the retirement of a neighboring mountain and called his apostles to him there. From the height of that mystical seat he could instruct them in the loftier doctrines, signifying from the very nature of the place and act that it was he who had once honored Moses by speaking to him. He spoke with Moses then, indeed, with a more terrifying justice, but now with a holier mercy in order that what had been promised might be fulfilled when the prophet Jeremiah says, “Behold, the days are coming when I will complete a new covenant for the house of Israel and for the house of Judah. After those days, says the Lord, I will put my laws in their minds, and in their heart will I write them.” He therefore who had spoken to Moses, spoke also to the apostles, and the swift hand of the Word wrote and deposited the secrets of the new covenant in the disciples’ hearts. There were no thick clouds surrounding him as of old, nor were the people frightened off from approaching the mountain by frightful sounds and lightning. Rather, quietly and freely his discourse reached the ears of those who stood by. In this way the harshness of the law might give way before the gentleness of grace, and “the spirit of adoption” might dispel the terrors of bondage.
Behold the order! He said that the covenant according to Christ is superior to the old one. And how is this evident? Because, he says, it is established on better promises. For if the promises and the recompenses are better, it is clear that the covenant is also better, and the commandments more divine. But how is it evident that the promises are better? From this, he says, that the former was set aside, but this one has taken its place. For this reason, the New covenant prevails, because it is better and more perfect. For if the former had been faultless, that is, if it had nothing lacking, if it made people blameless—then no second covenant would have been introduced.
If he had nothing lacking, he says, if he made men without fault, how then was he so disturbed? "For finding fault with them." To whom? The Jews who received and were governed by the laws in the Old Testament.
"Behold, the days are coming." "After having made the new covenant better than the old in many ways above, now clearly he also mocks the removal of the old, but he does not do this of his own accord, lest he become burdensome, and he brings forth Jeremiah saying, “in the day when I took them by the hand." (Jer. 31:32)
"in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt.” So that they do not suppose that the exodus is according to the covenant with Abraham; for it has occurred in Christ, “For to your seed,” he says, “who is Christ;” (Gal. 3:16) it brings forth what kind of covenant the exodus has become. That of the Exodus, he says, made through Moses. For to say, “not according to that covenant,” he shows it to be cast away, as if he were saying, “I will give another covenant, not such as I have already given. For that one, because of its weakness, has been cast away from me."
"because they did not continue." As if the statement serves as a defense for God's negligence; for He says, they did not continue My covenant. For from them began the disobedience, and thus God's negligence followed.
Continue studying Hebrews 8:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The new covenant will be of another kind than the one God made when he led Israel out of Egypt, because they did not continue in that covenant and he withdrew his favour.
“Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers”
The new covenant is of another kind than the one made with the exodus generation.
“in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt;”
The covenant began in tender grace, with God leading his people by the hand.
“because they continued not in my covenant,”
They did not remain in it. The failure was theirs.
“and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.”
God withdrew the favour the covenant promised to the obedient, a just response that led to exile.
A New Covenant Written on the Heart
Hebrews 8:7–13
Summary
Hebrews has just called Jesus the mediator of “a better covenant, which was established upon better promises” (Hebrews 8:6). In these seven verses the writer shows from Scripture why such a covenant was needed. The very promise of a second covenant proves that the first had a fault, and God made that promise through Jeremiah. The writer quotes the prophecy in full (Jeremiah 31:31–34): God will make a new covenant, of another kind than the one Israel broke after the exodus. In it he writes his laws on his people’s hearts, every one of them knows him, and he remembers their sins no more. Then the writer draws his conclusion. By calling the covenant new, God has made the first old, and what is old is near to vanishing away. Every promise here is God’s own “I will”, and every one is kept in Jesus Christ.
Why God promised a second covenant
“For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.” The first covenant is the one God made with Israel at Sinai through Moses. The word for faultless, ámemptos, means blameless or irreproachable. A covenant like that would have left room for nothing more, so when God himself looked ahead to a second covenant, he showed that the first was lacking. The verb for “sought”, zētéō, means to seek, desire or require. The writer leaves the seeker unnamed, and the next verse shows who it is: God, who says “I will make a new covenant”. The new covenant is God’s own provision for what the first could not do.
The lack lay in what the first covenant could accomplish. Its sacrifices “could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience” (Hebrews 9:9), and the law had “a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things” (Hebrews 10:1). That is why the same sacrifices were offered year after year (Hebrews 10:1–4). The writer has already spoken of the former commandment’s “weakness and unprofitableness”, and added, “For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God” (Hebrews 7:18–19). The first covenant was given by God and good for its time, and it was always preparing the way for something fuller.
Was the law of Moses at fault?
The fault God names in the next breath lies with the people: “For finding fault with them, he saith”. The verb mémphomai means to blame or find fault, and its object is “them”, the Israelites who “continued not in my covenant” (Hebrews 8:9). The law itself is good, as Paul says: “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good” (Romans 7:12). The law showed God’s will and exposed sin, and its sacrifices covered sin for a time. What it could never give was a new heart to keep it, or a sacrifice that cleansed the conscience once for all. So the two belong together: a people who kept failing, and a covenant that could command them but could not change them.
God’s promise through Jeremiah
Verses 8 to 12 quote Jeremiah 31:31–34. Jeremiah spoke these words to a nation in decline, facing exile because it had broken God’s covenant again and again (Jeremiah 31), and his message was hope: a restored people and a renewed closeness to God. The small word “For” that opens verse 8, gár, gives the reason for verse 7. The proof that a second covenant was sought is that God promised one.
“Behold, the days come, saith the Lord” is the prophets’ way of announcing something certain that God will bring about in his own time. “Behold”, idoú, is a command that calls for attention, and “the Lord”, kýrios, is the one supreme in authority. The verb “make”, synteléō, means to complete entirely or to carry out, so God speaks of a covenant he will bring to its full effect himself.
The word for covenant, diathḗkē, means a disposition, a covenant or a will, and comes from a verb meaning to put apart. In the covenants of Scripture, with Noah, Abraham, Moses and David, God is the one who sets the terms, and this covenant is his work from first to last. The word for new, kainós, means new, fresh or unused, and it can describe what is new as better than the old. Hebrews uses it in that fuller sense, for Jesus is “made a surety of a better testament” (Hebrews 7:22).
The promise comes at the turning point of the letter. The writer has shown that God’s final word is spoken in his Son (Hebrews 1:1–3), who is “made so much better than the angels” (Hebrews 1:4). He has shown Jesus to be a priest after the order of Melchizedek, greater than the priests of Levi (Hebrews 7), with “a more excellent ministry” in the true sanctuary in heaven (Hebrews 8:1–6). Now he turns from the priest to the covenant the priest serves. The God who promises it is the God who swore by himself to Abraham, so that we might have “a strong consolation” in his unchanging word (Hebrews 6:13–20).
The first readers needed this. They were Jewish Christians, perhaps in Rome or elsewhere in Italy, under pressure and possibly persecution, and tempted to go back to the temple, the priesthood and the sacrifices that had shaped their people for centuries. The writer answers from their own Scriptures. A new covenant was God’s plan all along, foretold by their own prophet.
The house of Israel and the house of Judah
The promise names both kingdoms, the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah, and so takes in the whole nation. It was given to Israel first, and in Christ it reaches all who belong to him by faith, Jew and Gentile alike. Paul still speaks of it for Israel: “For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins” (Romans 11:27). Believers differ on how much of the promise still waits to be fulfilled in the nation of Israel itself. On either view the covenant is Christ’s, and it comes through his blood.
The covenant Israel broke
God says the new covenant will be “Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers”. The fathers are the generation that came out of Egypt and received the law at Sinai. The name Aígyptos, Egypt, takes us back to the Passover and the exodus (Exodus 12) and to the covenant made at the mountain (Exodus 19–24), whose Ten Commandments are given again in Deuteronomy 5. That covenant promised blessing for obedience and curses for disobedience.
“In the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt” is a tender picture of God’s own hand guiding his people out of slavery. Great grace and power stood at the start of that covenant, and that makes what follows all the sadder. “They continued not in my covenant.” The verb is emménō, to remain in or persevere, and from the wilderness through the judges and the kings, Israel turned again and again to rebellion and idols.
Why did God say “I regarded them not”?
God withdrew the favour and protection that the covenant promised to an obedient people, as a just answer to their unfaithfulness, and that led in time to judgment and exile. The verb ameléō is formed from a negative and the verb “to care”, and means to neglect or disregard. It shows how holy God is and how seriously he takes his covenant. In the very next verse the same God promises these people a new covenant, so his purpose of love for them stands firm.
The failure of the first covenant shows what the law was for. “By the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin” (Romans 3:20). “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith” (Galatians 3:24). The new covenant meets the problem at its root, in the human heart.
God’s laws written on the heart
“After those days” points to a time beyond the era of the first covenant, and the promises that follow are all God’s own work. “I will put my laws into their mind” uses diánoia, from diá (through) and noûs (mind), meaning deep thought and the power to understand. “And write them in their hearts” uses epigráphō, from epí (upon) and gráphō (to write), meaning to inscribe. At Sinai God wrote his law on tablets of stone. Now he writes it within, so that his people understand his will with their minds and love it with their hearts, their wills and their desires. Obedience then comes from a changed heart that wants what God wants.
Paul describes believers in just these terms, as a letter “written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart” (2 Corinthians 3:3). Ezekiel gives the same promise: “A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh” (Ezekiel 36:26), and God goes on to say that he will put his Spirit within them and cause them to walk in his statutes (Ezekiel 36:26–27). Hebrews comes back to this promise later and quotes it again (Hebrews 10:16).
“I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people” is the oldest covenant promise of all. God said it at Sinai, “I will walk among you, and will be your God, and ye shall be my people” (Leviticus 26:12), and he said it again through Jeremiah, “Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people” (Jeremiah 7:23). It means belonging on both sides. God gives himself to his people as their God, with his protection, provision and presence, and they give themselves to him. This is the goal of all his saving work, that he should dwell with his people. In Christ it comes true: we receive the adoption of sons (Galatians 4:4–7), we are “joint-heirs with Christ” (Romans 8:17), and through him we “have access by one Spirit unto the Father” (Ephesians 2:18).
All shall know the Lord
Under the first covenant, knowledge of God passed from person to person. Parents taught their children, priests taught the people, and prophets brought God’s word. Verse 11 promises a time when every member of God’s people knows him. “Teach”, didáskō, is the ordinary word for teaching. The denial is made strong with ou mḗ, a double negative meaning “not at all” or “by no means”. The urging “Know the Lord” uses ginōskō, to know, come to know, perceive or understand. “For all shall know me” gives the reason with hóti, “because”, and here the verb is eídō, a primary verb meaning properly to see, literally or figuratively, and so to know. Its perfect oîda means “I know”, and the future “shall know” is formed from it.
“All”, pâs, takes in every one of them, “from the least to the greatest”. The least is mikrós, small, and the greatest is mégas, great in size, degree or rank. Naming the two ends takes in everyone between, whatever their age, standing or learning. Knowing the Lord belongs to every member of the new covenant community and is limited to no priestly class or learned few.
This knowledge grows out of verse 10. Because God has written his laws within, his people know him and his will from the heart. Jesus applied the same promise to those the Father draws to him: “And they shall be all taught of God” (John 6:45). John tells believers that “the same anointing teacheth you of all things” (1 John 2:27).
Does this mean we need no teachers?
The promise concerns knowing the Lord himself, and that knowledge now belongs to every believer through the Holy Spirit, who dwells in them. God still gives “pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints” (Ephesians 4:11–12), and all Scripture is “profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16–17). Teachers help believers grow, and the knowledge of God’s person and saving grace is already theirs.
How do we come to know the Lord?
We know God through Jesus Christ. “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him” (John 1:18). Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6) and the mediator of the new testament (Hebrews 9:15). When he died, the veil of the temple was rent (Matthew 27:51), and the way into God’s presence was opened to all who believe. He sent the Comforter (John 16:7), who “shall teach you all things” (John 14:26). So believers grow in knowing God through his word, through prayer and worship, and through obedience, for Jesus said of the one who keeps his commandments, “I will love him, and will manifest myself to him” (John 14:21).
Mercy, and sins remembered no more
The last promise is the deepest, and it holds up the rest: “For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.” God’s people can have his law in their hearts and know him because he has first dealt with their sin.
The word for merciful, híleōs, means propitious, favourably disposed, gracious and ready to show favour, especially in turning away judgment. In the Greek Old Testament it often translates words to do with atonement and reconciliation. Three words then cover the whole range of human wrong. Unrighteousness, adikía, is injustice and wrongdoing, both the state of being unrighteous and the acts that come from it. Sin, hamartía, comes from a verb meaning to miss the mark, and it is the broad word for every way we fall short of God. Iniquity, anomía, is lawlessness, the disregard of God’s law and order. Whatever form our wrong has taken, God’s mercy reaches it.
“Will I remember no more” is ou mḗ mnáomai éti: the strong double negative ou mḗ, the verb mnáomai, to bear in mind or remember, and éti, any longer. God says it as emphatically as it can be said. Under the first covenant the sacrifices kept sin in view: “But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year” (Hebrews 10:3–4). The new covenant rests on one sacrifice, for Christ “hath appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself” (Hebrews 9:26), and “was once offered to bear the sins of many” (Hebrews 9:26–28). “By his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us” (Hebrews 9:12).
Does God forget our sins?
God, who knows all things, chooses never again to bring our sins to mind against us, to accuse us, judge us or hold them against us. This is a judge’s act and a friend’s act together. The record of guilt is blotted out and the penalty is gone, because Christ has borne it. Paul says that God has quickened us together with Christ, “having forgiven you all trespasses; Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us” (Colossians 2:13–14). God said it long before through Isaiah: “I, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins” (Isaiah 43:25). Micah praises a God who “delighteth in mercy” and says, “thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the sea” (Micah 7:18–19). Because of this we have “boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus” (Hebrews 10:19–22).
The first covenant made old
In verse 13 the writer draws a conclusion from a single word of the prophecy. “In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old.” When God named the covenant new, he declared the first one old. The verb palaióō means to make old, worn out or obsolete, and “hath made” is in the perfect tense, an act completed with lasting effect. God made it old by his own word, and it is a verdict on what that covenant could do now that a better one has come.
“Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.” “Decayeth” is the same verb, palaióō, and “waxeth old” is gēráskō, to grow aged. The picture is of something worn with age and near its end. “Ready” is engýs, near, and “vanish away” is aphanismós, disappearance.
Hebrews shows what has taken its place. The priests of the old covenant stood daily offering the same sacrifices, “But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God” (Hebrews 10:11–14). Paul sets the two side by side in the same way: “For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious” (2 Corinthians 3:6–11). What passes away is the Mosaic covenant as the way God’s people relate to him, with its priesthood, sacrifices and ceremonies. God’s moral law and his saving purpose remain, and in Christ the promises, types and shadows of the old covenant reach the fulfilment they always pointed to. The law was a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ, “But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster” (Galatians 3:24–25).
Is the Old Testament still for us?
The Old Testament remains God’s word to us, for “All scripture is given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16). Through it we learn who God is, how his plan of redemption unfolded, the history of Israel, and the prophecies Christ fulfilled, including this one. What vanishes is the first covenant as a means of salvation and access to God, and the Scriptures that record it are as much God’s word as ever.
Christ, the mediator of the better covenant
Every promise in these verses comes true in Jesus. At the last supper he took the cup and said, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” (Luke 22:20), and “this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28). He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). He kept the law perfectly, and “while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). We are sanctified “through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Hebrews 10:10). With his own blood he entered the heavenly sanctuary, and his blood purges our conscience from dead works (Hebrews 9:11–14).
He “was raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:25), and now he is our great high priest who has passed into the heavens (Hebrews 4:14), “holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners” (Hebrews 7:26–28). “He ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25). So “I regarded them not” under the old covenant gives way to “I will be merciful to their unrighteousness” under the new. God makes us “able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life” (2 Corinthians 3:6). Christ is the covenant’s mediator, its surety and its heart.
Living under the better covenant
If you belong to Christ, these promises are yours today. Our standing with God rests on what he has promised and what Christ has done, so we can come to him with confidence. When old sins come back to mind, God has said he will remember them no more. The same God writes his law on your heart, so obedience grows out of love for him, and his Spirit keeps shaping your mind and desires. We also share the knowledge of the Lord with every believer beside us, from the least to the greatest, and each one is someone God has taught. And the grace we have received so fully is the grace we can show others when they wrong us.
Hebrews 8:7
“For if that first covenant had been faultless,”
The covenant made at Sinai, given by God and good, and lacking only in what it could accomplish. Ámemptos means blameless.
“then should no place have been sought for the second.”
God’s own promise of a second covenant proves the point. The passive “sought” leaves the seeker unnamed until verse 8 shows it is God.
Hebrews 8:8
“For finding fault with them, he saith,”
The blame falls on “them”, the people who broke the covenant, and God speaks it through Jeremiah.
“Behold, the days come, saith the Lord,”
The prophets’ formula for a certain future that God has appointed.
“when I will make a new covenant”
God makes it and brings it to completion. Kainós is new and fresh, and Hebrews calls the covenant better.
“with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:”
The northern and southern kingdoms together, the whole people of God.
Hebrews 8:9 This verse
“Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers”
The new covenant is of another kind than the one made with the exodus generation.
“in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt;”
The covenant began in tender grace, with God leading his people by the hand.
“because they continued not in my covenant,”
They did not remain in it. The failure was theirs.
“and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.”
God withdrew the favour the covenant promised to the obedient, a just response that led to exile.
Hebrews 8:10
“For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord;”
“This” points to the promises that follow, and “after those days” to a new era.
“I will put my laws into their mind,”
Understanding of God’s will, given by God himself.
“and write them in their hearts:”
Inscribed within, where the law at Sinai was written on stone, so that God’s people want to obey (2 Corinthians 3:3).
“and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:”
The ancient covenant promise of mutual belonging, now made sure in Christ.
Hebrews 8:11
“And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord:”
No one will need to urge a fellow member of the covenant to come to know God, because all already do.
“for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.”
Every member, small and great, knows the Lord, and the knowledge flows from the law written within.
Hebrews 8:12
“For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness,”
God’s gracious disposition toward the undeserving is the source of forgiveness.
“and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.”
Three words for wrong in this verse cover all of it, and God’s emphatic promise never to hold it against his people again rests on Christ’s one sacrifice.
Hebrews 8:13
“In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old.”
The word “new” in Jeremiah is itself God’s verdict that the first covenant is old.
“Now that which decayeth and waxeth old”
The first covenant is pictured as something worn and aged.
“is ready to vanish away.”
Its end is near, and the covenant it gives way to lasts.
Last revised