TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Hebrews 7:11–28. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Observe the necessity there was of raising up another priest, after the order of Melchisedec and not after the order of Aaron, by whom that perfection should come which could not come by the Levitical priesthood, which therefore must be changed, and the whole economy with it, Heb 7:11, Heb 7:12, etc. Here,
I.It is asserted that perfection could not come by the Levitical priesthood and the law.
They could not put those who came to them into the perfect enjoyment of the good things they pointed out to them; they could only show them the way.
II.That therefore another priest must be raised up, after the order of Melchisedec, by whom, and his law of faith, perfection might come to all who obey him; and, blessed be God, that we may have perfect holiness and perfect happiness by Christ in the covenant of grace, according to the gospel, for we are complete in him.
III.It is asserted that the priesthood being changed there must of necessity be a change of the law; there being so near a relation between the priesthood and the law, the dispensation could not be the same under another priesthood; a new priesthood must be under a new regulation, managed in another way, and by rules proper to its nature and order.
IV.It is not only asserted, but proved, that the priesthood and law are changed, Heb 7:13, Heb 7:14.
The priesthood and law by which perfection could not come are abolished, and a priest has arisen, and a dispensation is now set up, by which true believers may be made perfect. Now that there is such a change is obvious.
1.There is a change in the tribe of which the priesthood comes. Before, it was the tribe of Levi; but our great high priest sprang out of Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning the priesthood, Heb 7:14. This change of the family shows a real change of the law of the priesthood.
2.There is a change in the form and order of making the priests. Before, in the Levitical priesthood, they were made after the law of a carnal commandment; but our great high priest was made after the power of an endless life. The former law appointed that the office should descend, upon the death of the father, to his eldest son, according to the order of carnal or natural generation; for none of the high priests under the law were without father or mother, or without descent: they had not life and immortality in themselves. They had both beginning of days and end of life; and so the carnal commandment, or law of primogeniture, directed their succession, as it did in matters of civil right and inheritance. But the law by which Christ was constituted a priest, after the order of Melchisedec, was the power of an endless life. The life and immortality which he had in himself were his right and title to the priesthood, not his descent from former priests. This makes a great difference in the priesthood, and in the economy too, and gives the preference infinitely to Christ and the gospel. The very law which constituted the Levitical priesthood supposed the priests to be weak, frail, dying, creatures, not able to preserve their own natural lives, but who must be content and glad to survive in their posterity after the flesh; much less could they, by any power or authority they had, convey spiritual life and blessedness to those who came to them. But the high priest of our profession holds his office by that innate power of endless life which he has in himself, not only to preserve himself alive, but to communicate spiritual and eternal life to all those who duly rely upon his sacrifice and intercession. Some thing the law of the carnal commandment refers to the external rites of consecration, and the carnal offerings that were made; but the power of an endless life to the spiritual living sacrifices proper to the gospel, and the spiritual and eternal privileges purchased by Christ, who was consecrated by the eternal Spirit of life that he received without measure.
3.There is a change in the efficacy of the priesthood. The former was weak and unprofitable, made nothing perfect; the latter brought in a better hope, by which we draw near to God, Heb 7:18, Heb 7:19. The Levitical priesthood brought nothing to perfection: it could not justify men's persons from guilt; it could not sanctify them from inward pollution; it could not cleanse the consciences of the worshippers from dead works; all it could do was to lead them to the antitype. But the priesthood of Christ carries in it, and brings along with it, a better hope; it shows us the true foundation of all the hope we have towards God for pardon and salvation; it more clearly discovers the great objects of our hope; and so it tends to work in us a more strong and lively hope of acceptance with God. By this hope we are encouraged to draw nigh unto God, to enter into a covenant-union with him, to live a life of converse and communion with him. We may now draw near with a true heart, and with the full assurance of faith, having our minds sprinkled from an evil conscience. The former priesthood rather kept men at a distance, and under a spirit of bondage.
4.There is a change in God's way of acting in this priesthood. He has taken an oath to Christ, which he never did to any of the order of Aaron. God never gave them any such assurance of their continuance, never engaged himself by oath or promise that theirs should be an everlasting priesthood, and therefore gave them no reason to expect the perpetuity of it, but rather to look upon it as a temporary law. But Christ was made a priest with the oath of God: The Lord hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec, Heb 7:21. Here God has upon oath declared the immutability, excellency, efficacy, and eternity, of the priesthood of Christ.
5.There is a change in that covenant of which the priesthood was a security and the priest a surety; that is, a change in the dispensation of that covenant. The gospel dispensation is more full, free, perspicuous, spiritual, and efficacious, than that of the law. Christ is in this gospel covenant a surety for us to God and for God to us, to see that the articles be performed on both parts He, as surety, has united the divine and human nature together in his own person, and therein given assurance of reconciliation; and he has, as surety, united God and man together in the bond of the everlasting covenant. He pleads with men to keep their covenant with god, and he pleads with God that he will fulfil his promises to men, which he is always ready to do in a way suitable to his majesty and glory, that is, through a Mediator.
6.There is a remarkable change in the number of the priests under these different orders. In that of Aaron there was a multitude of priests, of high priests, not at once, but successively; but in this of Christ there is but one and the same. The reason is plain, The Levitical priests were many, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death. Their office, how high and honourable soever, could not secure them from dying; and, as one died, another must succeed, and after a while must give place to a third, till the number had become very great. But this our high priest continues for ever, and his priesthood is aparabaton - an unchangeable one, that does not pass from one to another, as the former did; it is always in the same hand. There can be no vacancy in this priesthood, no hour nor moment in which the people are without a priest to negotiate their spiritual concerns in heaven. Such a vacancy might be very dangerous and prejudicial to them; but this is their safety and happiness, that this ever-living high priest is able to save to the utmost - in all times, in all cases, in every juncture - all who come to God by him, Heb 7:25. So that here is a manifest alteration much for the better.
7.There is a remarkable difference in the moral qualifications of the priests. Those who were of the order of Aaron were not only mortal men, but sinful men, who had their sinful as well as natural infirmities; they needed to offer up sacrifices first for their own sins and then for the people. But our high priest, who was consecrated by the word of the oath, needed only to offer up once for the people, never at all for himself; for he has not only an immutable consecration to his office, but an immutable sanctity in his person. He is such a high priest as became us, holy, harmless, and undefiled, etc., Heb 7:26-28. Here observe,
(1.)Our case, as sinners, needed a high priest to make satisfaction and intercession for us.
(2.)No priest could be suitable or sufficient for our reconciliation to God but one who was perfectly righteous in his own person; he must be righteous in himself, or he could not be a propitiation for our sin, or our advocate with the Father.
(3.)The Lord Jesus was exactly such a high priest as we wanted, for he has a personal holiness, absolutely perfect. Observe the description we have of the personal holiness of Christ expressed in various terms, all of which some learned divines consider as relating to his perfect purity. [1.] He is holy, perfectly free from all the habits or principles of sin, not having the least disposition to it in his nature; no sin dwells in him, though it does in the best of Christians, not the least sinful inclination [2.] He is harmless, perfectly free from all actual transgression, has done no violence, nor is there any deceit in his mouth, never did the least wrong to God or man. [3.] He is undefiled, he was never accessory to other men's sins. It is a difficult thing to keep ourselves pure, so as not to partake in the guilt of other men's sins, by contributing in some way towards them, or not doing what we ought to prevent them. Christ was undefiled; though he took upon him the guilt of our sins, yet he never involved himself in the fact and fault of them. [4.] He is separate from sinners, not only in his present state (having entered as our high priest into the holiest of all, into which nothing defiled can enter), but in his personal purity: he has no such union with sinners, either natural or federal, as can devolve upon him original sin. This comes upon us by virtue of our natural and federal union with the first Adam, we descending from him in the ordinary way. But Christ was, by his ineffable conception in the virgin, separate from sinners; though he took a true human nature, yet the miraculous way in which it was conceived set him upon a separate footing from all the rest of mankind. [5.] He is made higher than the heavens. Most expositors understand this concerning his state of exaltation in heaven, at the right hand of God, to perfect the design of his priesthood. But Dr. Goodwin thinks this may be very justly referred to the personal holiness of Christ, which is greater and more perfect than the holiness of the hosts of heaven, that is, the holy angels themselves, who, though they are free from sin, yet are not in themselves free from all possibility of sinning. And therefore we read, God putteth no trust in his holy ones, and he chargeth his angels with folly (Job 4:18), that is, with weakness and peccability. They may be angels one hour and devils another, as many of them were; and that the holy angels shall not now fall does not proceed from an indefectibility of nature, but from the election of God; they are elect angels. It is very probable that this explanation of the words, made higher than the heavens, may be thought too much strained, and that it ought to be understood of the dignity of Christ's state, and not the perfect holiness of his person; and the rather because it is said he was made higher genomenos; but it is well known that this word is used in a neutral sense, as where it is said, genesthē ho Theos alēthēs - Let God be true. The other characters in the verse plainly belong to the personal perfection of Christ in holiness, as opposed to the sinful infirmities of the Levitical priests; and it seems congruous to think this must do so too, if it may be fairly taken in such a sense; and it appears yet more probable, since the validity and prevalency of Christ's priesthood in Heb 7:27 are placed in the impartiality and disinterestedness of it. He needed not to offer up for himself: it was a disinterested mediation; he mediated for that mercy for others which he did not need for himself; had he needed it himself, he had been a party, and could not have been a Mediator - a criminal, and could not have been an advocate for sinners. Now, to render his mediation the more impartial and disinterested, it seems requisite not only that he had no present need of that favour for himself which he mediated for in behalf of others, but that he never could stand in need of it. Though he needed it not today, yet if he knew he might be in such circumstances as to need it tomorrow, or at any future time, he must have been thought to have had some eye upon his own interest, and therefore could not act with impartial regard and pure zeal for the honour of God on one hand, and tender pure compassion for poor sinners on the other. I pretend not here to follow the notes of our late excellent expositor, into whose labours we have entered, but have taken the liberty to vindicate this notion of the learned Dr. Goodwin from the exceptions that I know have been made to it; and I have the rather done it because, if it will hold good, it gives us further evidence how necessary it was that the Mediator should be God, since no mere creature is of himself possessed of that impeccability which will set him above all possible need of favour and mercy for himself.
Historical interpretation
Seven Centuries of Reception
6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
We may also ask what it means when it says in the law that Moses’ face was shining with glory, though covered with a veil, while his hand when put “into his bosom” became “leprous as snow.” In this it seems to me the form of the whole law is quite fully described. For his “face” is the word of the law, and by “hand” are described the works of the law. “For no human being will be justified by works of the law.” Nor could the law lead anyone to “perfection.” In the same way the “leprous” hand of Moses was hidden in his bosom, since it could not perform any perfect work; but his face shone, though covered with a veil, since his word has the glory of knowledge, but a hidden glory.
Because of their earthly voluptuousness and desire for pleasure, which the former priests showed, and because of their infirmity, through which they made their people infirm before their cupidities, they did not bring any of them to that perfection, thanks to which we got rid of all our material goods. In fact, “the introduction” of the gospel made for the hope which surpassed what was previously preached to us, was also made for the introduction of this precept: through our own freedom from material possessions “we approach God,” whereas through the voluptuousness and pleasures of the law we were rejected and removed from God.
"For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before, for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof." Here the Heretics press on. But listen attentively. He did not say "for the evil," nor, "for the viciousness," but "for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof," yea and in other places also he shows the weakness; as when he says "In that it was weak through the flesh." The law itself then is not weak, but we.
The law ceases to have effect, he is saying, and the hope of better things is introduced. It ceases to have effect, not for being evil (the frenzied view of the heretics), but for being ineffective and incapable of providing the perfect benefit. It must be noted, of course, that he refers to the obsolete prescriptions of the law as ineffective and useless—circumcision, sabbath observance and similar things; the New Testament also bids us observe to a greater extent the commandments, you shall not kill, you shall not commit adultery, and suchlike things. In place of the former, therefore, we receive the hope of the good things to come: it relates us to God.
What he says: "to intercede," take as what is said: "We have an advocate with the Father." (1 Jn. 2:1) From His very incarnation, He asks and intercedes with the Father that He may have mercy on us.
He said that the new covenant is better. And this indicates, he says, the difference of the priests. He said that everything has changed. Therefore, he speaks of the reason for the change, and he says, "For annulment occurs of the preceding command.” Therefore, an annulment occurs when the preceding commandment is in force, that is, of the older law. Not simply, but then when it was found to be weak and unprofitable. Since there is no fault, what need is there for the change? Therefore, he says, this is also the law. For this, the preceding commandment has been annulled due to weakness and uselessness.
For the law was not able to produce any perfection in virtue. For it only said, "Do this," and "Do not do that," and it was no longer able to strengthen and assist in bringing about what was said, which now happens to us through the Spirit.
"but is a certain introduction." It is done in common.
"of a greater hope." For the law had hope, but not such as that which was introduced. For those who were observing the law hoped to possess the land. "For you shall eat the good things of the land," (Is. 1:19) but the hope through Christ gives the kingdom of heaven, and the nearness to stand before God, and to serve Him with angels.He said above (Heb. 4:6): Entering into the inner part of the veil; but now: Through which we draw near to God, he says; for the hope that is with him leads us to the divine throne, and stands with the Cherubim.
"because the matter was not done without an oath." And so much, he says, the hope has been greatly improved, insofar as Christ has become a priest without an oath. For the oath indicates the unchangeable nature of his being a high priest forever.
"For they indeed became priests without an oath." Then, from the lesser, the comparisons of the priests among the Jews and our High Priest.For the legal priests, he says, were made priests without an oath; for God never found it necessary to swear: "You shall be a priest according to the law." But Christ, with an oath, made by the one who said to Him, as it were, by God; for God spoke through David: "You are a priest," in a certain new way; for He is not according to Aaron, but according to Melchizedek.
"by the one who said to him." As through God. For God spoke through David, "So much better is Jesus." "For," he says, "they indeed became priests without an oath, but Christ has become a high priest with an oath. And this would not have happened, he says, if the difference were not great. Therefore, there is also a great difference between the new and the old."
"the Guarantor [Έγγυος]." Like a guarantor [ἐγγυητὴς], Mediator.
"And indeed, there were many." And according to another, he says, the high priest is greater than us, not only because of the oath, but also because he is immortal.
"because they were prevented by death." For it is through death and change, namely of the priest.
"from continuing." in the priesthood, namely, "permanently." Lacking succession, forever, "Therefore." Since he always living. "always." Not only in this age, but also in the future. For this is what they want entirely and completely.
"those who come to God." Through the faith that is in Him. For whoever believes in the Son, comes to the Father certainly; for he himself is the way to the Father, and whoever takes hold of this, dwells there.
"always living." Therefore, He saves completely, because He always lives. Furthermore, He saves because He intercedes for those who approach God the Father.
"to intercede for them." Concerning Christ, as He is according to the flesh, this humble word has been said. However, when I say according to the flesh, I do not mean division. Far from it: but I know Him to be worshiped indivisibly, without confusion in one hypostasis along with His flesh. But what does it mean, "to intercede for them "? For example, He asks his Father on our behalf. For when he called him a priest, it is characteristic of a priest to ask on behalf of the people; for this reason, he said, “to intercede." That this has been said for this reason is evident. For He who raises the dead by His own authority, forgives sins, does not need the Father to save, as if He were powerless to save by His own power.
Continue studying Hebrews 7:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Hebrews 7:18 articulates a pivotal theological declaration: the preceding commandment, specifically the Mosaic Law tied to the Levitical priesthood, is being set aside or annulled. This abrogation is presented not as a flaw in God's original intent, but as a necessary consequence of the Law's inherent limitations—its "weakness" and "unprofitableness"—in bringing about ultimate perfection and true reconciliation with God. This verse thus marks a decisive transition from the old covenant system to the superior and eternally effective new covenant established through Jesus Christ.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within the broader argument of Hebrews chapters 7-10, which meticulously establishes the superiority of Jesus Christ's high priesthood, modeled after Melchizedek, over the Aaronic (Levitical) priesthood. The immediate preceding verses, Hebrews 7:11-17, lay the groundwork by arguing that if perfection could have been achieved through the Levitical priesthood and the Law it upheld, there would have been no need for a new priest to arise, one not according to the law of carnal commandment but according to the power of an endless life. Verse 18 then provides the logical conclusion and theological justification for this shift: the old system, being insufficient, must be annulled. This sets the stage for the subsequent declaration in Hebrews 7:19 that "the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God." The author is building a cumulative case for Christ's supremacy, demonstrating why the old covenant had to be superseded.
Historical & Cultural Context
The epistle to the Hebrews was written to Jewish Christians who were likely facing persecution and perhaps contemplating a return to Judaism and its familiar rituals. For these believers, the Mosaic Law and the Levitical priesthood were foundational to their religious identity and understanding of God's relationship with humanity. The temple, its sacrifices, and the priestly lineage were central to their worship and national identity. To suggest that the Law was "disannulled" or "weak" would have been a profoundly challenging and potentially scandalous statement. The author's task was to demonstrate, using Old Testament types and prophecies, that the very Law they revered pointed forward to a greater reality in Christ, and that the old system was never intended to be the final means of salvation. The cultural understanding of covenants, sacrifice, and priestly mediation was deeply ingrained, making the author's detailed theological argument about Christ's superior covenant and priesthood critically important for his audience to grasp and embrace.
Key Themes
Hebrews 7:18 contributes significantly to several major theological themes within the epistle. Firstly, it underscores the inadequacy of the Old Covenant, particularly its ceremonial aspects and the Levitical priesthood, to bring about perfect reconciliation with God. The Law, while holy and good in its divine origin (Romans 7:12), was inherently "weak" and "unprofitable" in its ability to truly justify or sanctify. Secondly, it highlights the necessity of a New Covenant, which provides a "better hope" (Hebrews 7:19) and superior access to God. This new covenant is inaugurated by Jesus Christ, whose priesthood is "after the order of Melchizedek" (Hebrews 7:17), signifying a departure from the Levitical system. Thirdly, the verse implicitly points to the supremacy of Christ's work, emphasizing that His single, perfect sacrifice and eternal priesthood are the ultimate fulfillment of God's redemptive plan, rendering the repetitive and temporary sacrifices of the old system obsolete (Hebrews 10:1-4).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term, derived from ἀθετέω, signifies cancellation, revocation, or the act of putting something away. In this context, it implies a decisive and deliberate act of setting aside or rendering invalid, emphasizing that the "commandment going before" is no longer operative in the same way.
From ἐντέλλομαι, this refers to an injunction or an authoritative prescription. Here, it specifically denotes the Mosaic Law, particularly those aspects related to the ceremonial and priestly system, which prescribed the rituals and functions of the old covenant.
From Α (negative particle) and the base of σθενόω, this word describes a state of being strengthless, impotent, or without inherent power. It does not imply moral failing of the Law itself, but rather its inability to achieve ultimate spiritual perfection or to truly justify humanity before God.
From Α (negative particle) and the base of ὠφέλιμος, this term means uselessness or inutility. It underscores that the old system, despite its divine origin, was ultimately unbeneficial in providing the lasting righteousness and perfect access to God that humanity needed.
Verse Breakdown
"For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before"
The particle "For" (G1063, gár) introduces the reason or explanation for the preceding discussion about the change in priesthood. "Verily" (G3303, mén) adds emphasis, affirming the truth of the statement. The core assertion is the "disannulling" (G115, athétēsis), a decisive cancellation or setting aside, of the "commandment going before" (G1785, entolḗ G4254, proágō). This refers to the Mosaic Law, particularly its ceremonial and priestly aspects, which preceded the new covenant and was foundational to the old covenant system. The implication is a divine act of revocation.
"for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof."
This clause provides the crucial justification for the disannulling. The preposition "for" (G1223, diá) indicates the cause or reason. The Law is deemed "weakness" (G772, asthenḗs) and "unprofitableness" (G512, anōphelḗs). This does not mean the Law was flawed in its origin or morally corrupt, but rather that it was inherently powerless and ineffective in achieving its ultimate purpose: to make humanity perfect and bring them into full, lasting communion with God. It could reveal sin but not remove it definitively; it could provide temporary atonement but not eternal justification. The pronoun "thereof" (G846, autós) refers back to "the commandment going before," clarifying that its limitations necessitated its abrogation.
Literary Devices
The author employs several literary devices to convey his message with clarity and force. Causality is central, as the verse explicitly states the reason ("for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof") for the "disannulling of the commandment." This causal link strengthens the theological argument, presenting the abrogation not as arbitrary but as a logical necessity. Contrast is implicitly present, setting the "commandment going before" (the old covenant) against the "better hope" (the new covenant) that is soon to be introduced, highlighting the former's deficiencies. The use of strong, definitive terms like "disannulling," "weakness," and "unprofitableness" adds a sense of emphatic declaration, underscoring the finality and justification of the shift from the old order to the new. This precise and decisive language serves to persuade the audience of the divine imperative behind the change.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Hebrews 7:18 stands as a foundational statement for understanding the nature of the New Covenant and the finished work of Christ. It asserts that the Mosaic Law, particularly its ceremonial and priestly components, was never intended to be the ultimate means of salvation or perfection. Its purpose was preparatory, revealing sin and pointing to the need for a greater sacrifice and a perfect High Priest. The "disannulling" is not an indictment of God's Law as inherently evil, but rather an acknowledgment of its limitations in achieving what only Christ could accomplish. This theological truth liberates believers from the burden of a system that could only expose their sin and offer temporary solutions, ushering them into the glorious freedom of a covenant founded on grace and the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice of Jesus. It underscores that our access to God is now direct, through Christ, rather than through an intermediary system of rituals and animal sacrifices.
Reflection and Application
Hebrews 7:18 offers profound implications for the believer today, inviting us to live in the full assurance and freedom of the new covenant. It reminds us that our standing before God is not based on our adherence to a set of external rules or rituals, but on the perfect and complete work of Jesus Christ. We are no longer bound by a system that could only highlight our imperfections and offer temporary atonement. Instead, we have direct, confident access to God through our High Priest, Jesus, whose sacrifice is eternally effective. This should lead to a deep sense of gratitude and security, knowing that our salvation is not dependent on our own strength or performance, but on Christ's finished work. It calls us to abandon any lingering legalism or reliance on human effort for righteousness, and instead to rest fully in the grace provided by the new covenant. Our worship, our service, and our daily walk should flow from this understanding of Christ's supremacy and the Law's fulfillment in Him.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Does this verse mean that the entire Old Testament Law is completely abolished for Christians?
No, this verse specifically refers to the "commandment going before" (G1785, entolḗ G4254, proágō), which in context, primarily concerns the ceremonial and priestly aspects of the Mosaic Law that were intrinsically tied to the Levitical priesthood and its sacrificial system. The author of Hebrews is arguing for the obsolescence of this specific system because it was "weak" and "unprofitable" in bringing ultimate perfection. The moral law, as reflected in the Ten Commandments and reiterated in the New Testament, continues to reveal God's character and righteous standards, guiding believers in ethical living. However, even the moral law cannot justify or save; it serves to expose sin and point to the need for Christ, who perfectly fulfilled it (Matthew 5:17). The focus here is on the system of attaining righteousness and access to God, which has been superseded by Christ's superior priesthood and sacrifice under the new covenant.
What exactly made the "commandment going before" weak and unprofitable?
The weakness and unprofitableness of the old commandment did not stem from any flaw in God's divine authorship, but from its inherent inability to achieve ultimate spiritual perfection and lasting reconciliation with God. It was weak because it could not truly cleanse the conscience from sin (Hebrews 9:9) or provide eternal redemption through its animal sacrifices, which had to be repeatedly offered (Hebrews 10:1-4). It was unprofitable because it could not impart the Holy Spirit or transform the heart in the way the new covenant does. The Law served to reveal sin and to function as a "tutor" or "schoolmaster" leading people to Christ (Galatians 3:24), but it could not provide the power or means for true righteousness or perfect communion with God. Its limitations necessitated the bringing in of a "better hope" (Hebrews 7:19) through Christ.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Hebrews 7:18 finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who is the ultimate "better hope" (Hebrews 7:19) that superseded the old covenant. The "disannulling" of the former commandment due to its weakness and unprofitableness is precisely what necessitated Christ's arrival as the perfect High Priest. The Law, with its Levitical priesthood and animal sacrifices, could never truly perfect those who drew near to God (Hebrews 10:1). It was a shadow, a temporary provision, pointing forward to the substance that is Christ (Colossians 2:17). Jesus, through His once-for-all sacrifice on the cross, perfectly fulfilled the righteous demands of the Law and inaugurated a new and living way to God (Hebrews 10:20). His priesthood, being "after the order of Melchizedek" (Hebrews 7:17) and based on an "endless life" (Hebrews 7:16), is eternal and unchangeable, providing perfect and complete salvation. Thus, Hebrews 7:18 is not merely a statement about the Law's inadequacy, but a glorious declaration of Christ's absolute supremacy and the eternal efficacy of His redemptive work, making perfect what the old system could not.