Haggai 2:11
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- כֹּהkohthusH3541AdvAdverb
- אָמַר'a·Marhe saysH559V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- יְהוָהYah·wehYahwehH3068N-properNoun Proper Title
- צְבָאוֹתtze·va·'otof hostsH6635N-fpNoun Plural (-ôt ending) Absolute
- שְׁאַלshe·'alaskH7592V-Qal-Imp-2msVerb Qal Imperative 2nd Singular Masculine
- נָאna'pleaseH4994PrtParticle Interjection
- אֶת'et[obj.]H853DirObjMParticle Object Indicator
- הַכֹּהֲנִיםha·ko·ha·Nimthe priestsH3548Art ¦ N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absoluteהַtheכֹּהֲנִיםpriests
- תּוֹרָהto·RahinstructionH8451N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- לֵאמֹרle·Mor[to] sayingH559Prep-l ¦ V-Qal-InfVerb Qal Infinitive Constructלֵ[to]אמֹרsaying
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Haggai 2:10–19. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
This sermon was preached two months after that in the former part of the chapter. The priests and Levites preached constantly, but the prophets preached occasionally; both were good and needful. We have need to be taught our duty in season and out of season. The people were now going on vigorously with the building of the temple, and in hopes shortly to have it ready for their use and to be employed in the services of it; and now God sends them a message by his prophet, which would be of use to them.
I.By way of conviction and caution.
They were now engaged in a very good work, but they were concerned to see to it, not only that it was good for the matter of it, but that it was done in a right manner, for otherwise it would not be accepted of God. God sees there are many among them that spoil this good work, by going about it with unsanctified hearts and hands, and are likely to gain no advantage to themselves by it; these are here convicted, and all are warned thereby to purify the hands they employ in this work, for to the pure only all things are pure, and from the pure only that comes which is pure. This matter is here illustrated by the established rules of the ceremonial law, in putting a difference between the clean and the unclean, about which many of the appointments of the law were conversant. Hereby it appears that a spiritual use is to be made of the ceremonial law, and that it was intended, not only as a divine ritual to the Jews, but for instruction in righteousness to all, even to us upon whom the ends of the world have come, to discover to us both sin and Christ, both our disease and our remedy. Now observe here,
1.What the rule of the law was. The prophet is ordered to enquire of the priests concerning it (Haggai 2:11); for their lips should keep this knowledge, and the people should enquire the law at their mouth, Malachi 2:7. Haggai himself, though a prophet, must ask the priests concerning the law. His business, as an extraordinary messenger, was to expound the providences of God, and to give directions concerning particular duties, as he had done, Haggai 1:8, Haggai 1:9. But he would not take the priests' work out of the hands of those who were the ordinary ministers, and whose business it was to expound the ordinances of God, to teach the people the meaning of them, and to give the general rules for the observance of them. In a case of that nature, Haggai must himself consult them. Note, God has given to his ministers diversities of gifts, and calls them out to do diversities of services, so that they have need one of another, should make use one of another, and be helpful one to another. The prophet, though divinely inspired, cannot say to the priest, I have no need of thee, nor can the priest say so to the prophet. Perhaps Haggai was therefore ordered to consult the priests, that out of their own mouths he might judge both them and the people committed to their charge, and convict them of worse than ceremonial pollution. See Leviticus 10:10, Leviticus 10:11. Now the rules of the law, in the cases propounded, are,
(1.)That he that has holy flesh in his clothes cannot by the touch of his clothes communicate holiness (Haggai 2:12): If one bear holy flesh in the skirt of his garment, though the garment is thereby so far made a devoted thing as that it is not to be put to common use till it has first been washed in the holy place (Leviticus 6:27), yet it shall by no means transmit a holiness to either meat or drink, so as to make it ever the better to those that use it.
(2.)That he that is ceremonially unclean by the touch of a dead body does by his touch communicate that uncleanness. The law is express (Numbers 19:22), Whatsoever the unclean person touches shall be unclean; yet this Haggai will have from the priests' own mouth, for concerning those things that we find very plain in our Bibles yet it is good to have the advice of our ministers. The sum of these two rules is that pollution is more easily communicated than sanctification; that is (says Grotius), There are many ways of vice, but only one of virtue, and that a difficult one. Bonum oritur ex integris; malum ex quolibet defectu - Good implies perfection; evil commences with the slightest defect. Let not men think that living among good people will recommend them to God if they are not good themselves, but let them fear that touching the unclean thing will defile them, and therefore let them keep at a distance from it.
2.How it is here applied (v. 14): So is this people, and so is this nation, before me. He does not call them his people and his nation (they are unworthy to be owned by him), but this people, and this nation. They have been thus before God; they thought their offering sacrifices on the altar would sanctify them, and excuse their neglect to build the temple, and remove the curse which by that neglect they had brought upon their common enjoyments: "No," says God, "your holy flesh and your altar will be so far from sanctifying your meat and drink, your wine and oil, to you, that your contempt of God's temple will bring a pollution, not only on your common enjoyments, but even on your sacrifices too; so that while you continued in that neglect all was unclean to you, nay, and so is this people still; and so they will be; on these terms they will still stand with me, and on no other - that if they be profane, and sensual, and morally impure, if they have wicked hearts, and live wicked lives, though they work ever so hard at the temple while it is building, and though they offer ever so many and costly sacrifices there when it is built, yet that shall not serve to sanctify their meat and drink to them, and to give them a comfortable use of them; nay, the impurity of their hearts and lives shall make even that work of their hands, and all their offerings, unclean, and an abomination to God." And the case is the same with us. Those whose devotions are plausible, but whose conversation is wicked, will find their devotions unable to sanctify their enjoyments, but their wickedness prevailing to pollute them. Note, When we are employed in any good work we should be jealous over ourselves, lest we render it unclean by our corruptions and mismanagements.
II.By way of comfort and encouragement.
If their hearts be right with God, and their eye single in his service, they shall have the benefit of their devotion. God will take away the judgment of famine wherewith they have been corrected for their remissness, and will restore them great plenty. This they are called to consider, and to observe whether God would not be to the utmost as good as his word, and by his providence remarkably countenance and recompense their reformation in this matter. To make this the more signal, let them set down the day when they began to work at the building of the temple, to raise the structure upon the foundations that had been laid some time before. On the twenty-fourth day of the sixth month they began to prepare materials (Haggai 1:15), and now on the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month they began to lay a stone upon a stone in the temple of the Lord; let them take notice of this day, and observe,
1.How they had gone behind-hand in their estates before this day. Let them remember the time when there was a sensible waste and decay in all they had, Haggai 2:16. A man went to his garner, expecting to find a heap of twenty measures of corn, so much he used to have from such a piece of ground, or so much used to be left at that time of the year, or so much he took it for granted there was when he fetched the last from it, but he found it unaccountably diminished, and, when he came to measure it, there were but ten measures; it had run in and dried away in the keeping, or vermin had eaten it, or it was stolen. In like manner he went to the wine-press, expecting to draw fifty vessels of wine, for so much he used to have from such a quantity of grapes, but they did not yield as usual, for he could get but twenty. This agrees with what we had, Haggai 1:9, You looked for much, and it came to little. Note, It is our folly that we are apt to raise our expectation from the creature, and to think tomorrow must needs be as this day and much more abundant, but we are commonly disappointed, and the more we expect the more grievous the disappointment is. In the stores and treasures of the new covenant we need not fear being disappointed when we come by faith to draw from them. But this was not all. God did visibly contend with them in the weather (Haggai 2:17): I smote you with blastings, winds and frosts, which made every green thing to wither, and with mildew, which choked the corn when it was knitting, and with hail, which battered it down and broke it when it had grown to some maturity; thus they were disappointed in all the labour of their hands, while they neglected to lay their hand to the work of God and to labour in that. Note, While we take no care of God's interest we cannot expect he should take care of ours. And, when he thus walks contrary to us, he expects that we should return to him and to our duty. But this people either saw not the hand of God in it (imputing it to chance) or saw not their own sin as the provoking cause of it, and therefore turned not to him. They were a long time incorrigible and unhumbled under these rebukes, so that God's hand was stretched out still, for the people turned not to him that smote them, Isaiah 9:12, Isaiah 9:13. They might easily observe that as long as they continued in neglect of the temple work all their affairs went backward. But,
2.Let them now observe, and they should find that from this day forward God would bless them (Haggai 2:18, Haggai 2:19): "Consider now whether when you begin to change you way towards God you do not find God changing his way towards you; from this day, when you fall to work about the temple, consider it, I say, and you shall find a remarkable turn given for the better to all your affairs. Is the seed yet in the barn? Yes it is, and not yet thrown into the ground. The fruit-trees do not as yet bud, the vine, and the fig-tree, and the olive-tree, have not as yet brought forth, so that nothing appears to promise a good harvest or vintage next year. Nature does not promise it; but now that you begin to apply in good earnest to your duty, the God of nature promises it; he has said, From this day I will bless you. It is the best day's work you ever did in your lives, for hence you may date the return of your prosperity." He does not say what they shall be, but, in general, I will bless you; and those that know what are the fruits flowing from God's blessing know they can desire no more to make them happy. "I will bless you, and then you shall soon recover all your losses, shall thrive as fast as before you went backward; for the blessing of the Lord, that maketh rich, and those whom he blesses are blessed indeed." Note, When we begin to make conscience of our duty to God we may expect his blessing; and this tree of life is so known by its fruits that one may discern almost to a day a remarkable turn of Providence in favour of those that return in a way of duty; so that they and others may say that from this day they are blessed. See Malachi 3:10. And whoso is wise will observe these things, and understand by them the lovingkindness of the Lord.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
He writes to Timothy, who had been trained in the holy writings from a child, exhorting him to study them diligently and not to neglect the gift that was given him with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery. To Titus he gives commandment that among a bishop’s other virtues (which he briefly describes) he should be careful to seek a knowledge of the Scriptures: “A bishop,” he says, must hold fast “the faithful word as he has been taught that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.” In fact, lack of education in a clergyman prevents him from doing well to anyone but himself, and much as the virtue of his life may build up Christ’s church, he does it an injury as great by failing to resist those who are trying to pull it down. The prophet Haggai says—or rather the Lord says it by the mouth of Haggai—“ask now the priests concerning the law.” For such is the important function of the priesthood to give answers to those who question them concerning the law.
(Verse 11 and following). On the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, in the second year of Darius ((Vulg. adds King)), the word of the Lord came to the prophet Haggai, saying: Thus says the Lord of hosts; ask the priests concerning the law, saying: If a man carries holy flesh in the fold of his garment, and touches bread, or stew, or wine, or oil, or any kind of food, shall it become holy? And the priests answered and said: No. And Haggai said: If someone who is polluted in soul touches any of these things, will it be contaminated? And the priests answered and said: It will be contaminated. And Haggai replied and said: So will this people and this nation be before me, says the Lord; and so will all the work of their hands and all that they offer there be contaminated. On the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, in the second year of Darius, the word of the Lord came to the prophet Haggai, saying: Thus says the Lord of hosts; ask the priests concerning the law, saying: If a person takes holy flesh in the corner of his garment and touches with the corner of his garment bread, or cooked food, or wine, or oil, or any kind of food, shall it be sanctified? And the priests answered and said, No. And Haggai said, If one who is unclean by reason of a dead body touches any of these, does it become unclean? The priests answered and said, It becomes unclean. Then Haggai answered and said, So is this people, and so is this nation before me, says the Lord, and so is every work of their hands; and whatever they offer there is unclean. Therefore, whoever comes near there becomes unclean, because of the morning offerings and the sacrifices that are offered there; they shall mourn because of their evil doings, and they shall be appalled at their own abominable practices. Therefore, we have included the edition of the Seventy Interpreters, because they seemed to differ in certain words. And this that is said: Because of their morning gifts, they will lament from the face of their wickedness, and they will argue at the gates with the ones who bring sweet-smelling offerings; neither in Hebrew, nor among other interpreters is it found. It should be noted that in this place: On the twentieth and fourth day of the ninth month, in the second year, it is not said for the third time as above: The word of the Lord came into the hand of the prophet Haggai; but it is said to the prophet Haggai. For there, because it was still making progress and only the works were pure, but his heart had not yet received full wisdom; either because he was still living among those who said, 'The time has not yet come to build the house of the Lord,' only his works became the word of the Lord. But now, since the foundations of the temple have been laid and the people have entered with their leaders into the house of God, and he is doing work befitting the temple of God, and he has heard the mystery: 'I will shake all nations, and the Desired One of all nations will come, and he is full of prophecy;' therefore, the whole oracle of the Lord is directed to Haggai. On the twenty-fourth day and the second year, we have already said: the number nine, which is added here, is never read in a good way. The people sacrifice the Passover lamb and celebrate other festivities; the whole solemnity ends on the eighth day and does not reach the ninth. Those who prepare the Passover lamb begin preparing it after the ninth day has passed. The day of atonement and expiation of the seventh month is also celebrated after the ninth day. And in Jeremiah (Chap. XIX and LII), as it can be clear to those reading, Jerusalem is besieged by the Babylonians in the ninth year. Therefore, because the prophecy of the impending defilement of the people was to come true, in the second year of Darius the ninth month is joined. Again, because a place of repentance is given after the correction of defilement, on the twenty-fourth day the word of God comes to the prophet Haggai, so that, as if in the person of the Lord, a question is asked of the priests coming from the law, and it is said to him: Ask the priests the law, saying. At the same time, consider it to be the duty of priests to respond to inquiries about the law. If someone is a priest, they should know the law of the Lord; if they are ignorant of the law, they prove themselves not to be a priest of the Lord. For it is the role of a priest to know the law and to respond to inquiries about the law. Indeed, we read in Deuteronomy (Chapter 17) that whenever a dispute arises in the towns of Israel between blood and blood, between judgment and judgment, between leprosy and leprosy, between contradiction and contradiction, they should go to the priests and Levites, and to the priest who is appointed in those days, and inquire about the law of the Lord. And when they have received a response, they should do as they are commanded. But if they do not do so, they shall be exterminated from their people. And lest these precepts appear only in the old Instrument, the Apostle also speaks to Timothy, that a bishop must not only be irreproachable, but also the husband of one wife, wise, chaste, adorned, hospitable, and also a teacher (1 Tim. 3). And lest it seem by chance that he said this, the same caution is observed in regard to the ordination of presbyters (whom he also wants to be understood as bishops) in Titus (1:5-9). Because of this, I left you in Crete, so that you could correct the things that needed finishing and appoint elders in each city, just as I instructed you: If any man is blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children who are not accused of wildness or unruly behavior. For a bishop must be blameless as the steward of God, not self-willed, not easily angered, not given to violence, not a striker, not greedy for filthy lucre; but hospitable, loving what is good, sensible, just, holy, self-controlled, holding firmly to the faithful message as taught, so that he may be able to encourage others by sound teaching and to refute those who contradict it. For there are many who are not subject, empty talkers, and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, whom it is necessary to silence. I have explained these things at length so that we may know that it is the duty of priests, both in the old and new Testament, to know the law of God and to respond to what they are asked. And simplicity and abstinence from foods are not enough in a teacher: unless he can also instruct others by what he does. Certainly, because I think they will answer: this is the task of those who from their youth prepare themselves for teaching, and who are often chosen as priests by the judgment of the Lord and the vote of the people. At least let them have this, that after they have been ordained as priests, they learn the law of God, so that they can teach what they have learned, and increase their knowledge more than their wealth, and not be ashamed to learn from laypeople, who know those things that pertain to the office of priests, and rather spend their nights and days in the study of the Scriptures than in reasoning and calculation. What is it that Haggai, speaking in the Lord's name, asks the priests? If a man carries holy flesh in the fold of his garment and touches bread, stew, wine, oil, or any food, will it become holy? Before we discuss the question, we must first understand, according to the written word, what holy flesh is and what defiles the soul. The sacrifices that were offered on the altar consisted of these holy meats, and among them there was a great diversity. For some priests were eating in the inner sanctuary of the temple, others at home, others who seemed to be blemished from among the priests, and others who were Israelites and had no impurity. The reason for this diversity is said to be found in the book of Leviticus. However, one who had touched the body of a dead person was called unclean in the soul. In this, it should be noted that as long as the soul is in the body, the human body is not unclean. But as soon as the animating spirit leaves the limbs, that which is earthly becomes unclean, as it is written in the same book of Leviticus: 'And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Speak to the priests the sons of Aaron, and you shall say to them: They shall not become unclean in their souls among their people; but they may become unclean among their relatives who are close to them: over their mother, and over their father, and over their sons and daughters, and over their brothers and sisters who are virgins and who are not given to a husband. They shall not become unclean over these, and they shall not defile themselves suddenly among their people in their defilement.' (Lev. 21:1-2) Consider this command for the priests not to enter any dead person, except for their relatives and close ones, as mentioned above. But the high priest, that is, the pontiff, had something more than the other priests: neither piety nor affection could persuade him to become unclean in the aforementioned cases. For Scripture says: And he shall not enter on any soul that is dead: not even on his father or mother, and he shall not defile himself. Therefore, knowing what sanctified flesh is, and what is unclean in the soul, let us see what the prophet seeks. If any man, not this man who is called the Pontiff, or the priest, or the Levite; but any man: where the person is not specified, it is allowed to everyone everywhere to touch the flesh. If he takes, he says, the sanctified flesh, and ties it to the top of his garment, and the top of the garment touches bread, or any other cooked food, or wine, or oil, or any food besides these that a man can eat, can the bread, or wine, or oil, or any food, be sanctified by touching the garment to which the holy flesh is bound? And the responding priests said: It is not possible, that is, nothing of what you ask will be sanctified; but everything will remain as it was. Again, another question is posed to the priests: namely, if they have answered well to the previous one, and a similar problem is presented, in which an ignorant person could easily slip up. For let us suppose that someone does not know the law, and as he answered that sanctified meat does not sanctify bread, or porridge, or wine, or oil, or any food, he will also respond in this case and say: The defiled in the soul does not defile those things which the holy flesh could not sanctify. Therefore, he asks: If someone who is polluted in their soul, meaning someone who has become impure from contact with a dead body, touches any of these things, namely bread or porridge or wine or oil or other foods, will the things they touch be polluted as well? And the priests, whose leader was Jesus son of Josedec, who knew the law, answered and said that anything touched by someone who is impure will be polluted. And Haggai answered and said, keeping silent about the former things, that consecrated flesh cannot sanctify other foods; and he addressed the second question, saying: Thus says the Lord: This people and this nation, in my presence, are unclean in their souls, and if they touch anything that is dead, whatever they touch and whatever they offer to me will be unclean. And what he says according to the letter, is this: O people, who, after just building the altar and destroying my house, offer sacrifices to me on the altar, and think that you are sanctified by its victims and flesh: know that you are not sanctified by the sacrifices, which, with the temple destroyed, cannot benefit you; but rather, all your works and everything you do are contaminated because you neglect and are more concerned with building your own house than mine. Indeed, the offering on the altar is sacred; but you are not sanctified so much by the sacrifices as by dwelling in the valleys and being involved in dead works, you are polluted. This is according to history, although we have drawn spiritual lines of intelligence from it. Furthermore, according to the ἀναγωγὴ, just as Ecclesiasticus says, the man who offered an unblemished lamb and a yearling and was clothed with Christ, if he takes of its flesh and binds it on the top of his garment, and the top touches the bread of Scripture, which strengthens the hearts of believers, or the cooking, the apostolic Epistles, which cuts and cooks the flesh of the old Law and provides them for eating, or the wine that gladdens the heart of man, or the oil in which the face of the hearer is brightened, or any food: milk, with which the Corinthians are nourished (I Cor. 2), and vegetables on which the weak feed (Rom. XIV, 3), and other similar things: they do not immediately eat them as if they were sanctified, to whomever they may be given. For it is not from what is said, but from what is received, that the hearers are sanctified: because many are hearers of the law, but not doers. But also for this reason I believe that all these things which I have said, are not sanctified when carried from the touch of the garment to those who eat, because they only touch the surface of the cloak; and the inward parts, the moisture, the blood, the veins, and the nerves, are not known to be sanctified. Therefore, just as the surface of the Lord's garment and a light touch do not sanctify, unless the one who eats the flesh of the lamb and drinks his blood: so, on the contrary, uncleanness in the soul, and various perverse teachings, make whatever they touch unclean. For they have in their sacraments bread and wine and oil and all kinds of food; but their sacraments are like bread of mourning, all who touch them will be contaminated. They also read the Scriptures themselves and, as it were, sprinkle bread with testimonies from the Scriptures, and they cook it all night in a pan; but when it is given to be eaten, those who eat it are provoked to madness. They have porridge and cooking, attempting to weave mystical things from the Scriptures according to the sense of their own perversity, and as if to cook and season the flesh of the lamb, but that cooking is destruction. They have wine, but not from the vineyard of Sorek, which the Lord planted in Jeremiah, chosen and entirely true (Jer. II); but from the vineyard of Sodom. They also have oil, which they violently extract from the testimonies of the Old and New Scriptures, and promise it as a refreshment to deceived and weary minds; but the holy one detests it, and says: But the oil of the sinner will not anoint my head (Ps. CXL, 5). They also have various foods, namely, the multitude of various assumptions and various treatises, which, because they are written by the unclean, and have been uttered by an unclean mouth, whoever touches them will become unclean and be drawn into their error. Then Aggaeus replied, who knows the differences of festivals, and for that reason he obtained the name: Thus, this people and this nation, namely the Jews, and the Gentiles, and all heretics, in my sight, says the Lord: Everything they have done, whether they have offered it to me as vows for salvation, or for peace, or for sin, or for offense, or as a burnt offering, or as alms, or as fasting, or as self-control in food, or as bodily chastity, will be defiled in my sight. Although they may appear holy in their outward appearance, those things that are offered by such individuals are tainted because they have been touched by someone whose soul is defiled. Everything becomes polluted.
Continue studying Haggai 2:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The LORD of hosts sends Haggai to ask the priests for a ruling of the law, so that their own answer lays the ground for what he says next.
“Thus saith the LORD of hosts;”
ʼâmar with the title built on tsâbâʼ, host or army, the God who commands heaven’s hosts.
“Ask now the priests”
The command goes to Haggai, who puts the questions himself in verses 12 and 13. kôhên is the ordinary word for a priest.
“concerning the law, saying,”
tôwrâh is teaching or instruction, and the people want a ruling on a point of the purity laws. “Saying” introduces the two questions.
Unclean Hands and the Promise of Blessing
Haggai 2:10–19
Summary
On the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, in the second year of Darius, the LORD sends Haggai to put two questions of law to the priests. If a man carries holy flesh in the fold of his garment and the fold brushes against bread or wine, is the food made holy? The priests answer, “No.” If a man made unclean by a dead body touches the same food, is it made unclean? They answer, “It shall be unclean.” The LORD then applies their answers to the whole nation: the people, all the work of their hands and the very offerings on the altar are unclean before him. He calls them to look back on the lean years before a stone was laid upon a stone in his temple, when a heap of twenty measures gave ten and he struck their crops with blasting, mildew and hail, and still they “turned not” to him. And on this very day, with the barn empty and the fruit trees still bare, he promises, “from this day will I bless you.”
Two truths stand together here. Uncleanness spreads to whatever it touches while holiness stays with what God has set apart, so a people who have turned from him make even their worship unclean. And the God who tells them the truth about their condition is the same God who marks a day and pours out blessing on a people who have come back to his work.
When and how this word came
Haggai dates this message with care: “the four and twentieth day of the ninth month, in the second year of Darius”. Darius is Darius I, king of Persia, and the date falls in 520 BC, around December 18 by our calendar. It is the third of Haggai’s four messages. It comes a little over two months after his second, the promise of the future glory of the rebuilt temple (Haggai 2:1–9). The people had taken up the work on the temple again three months before, in the sixth month (Haggai 1:15).
By now the exiles had been home for about eighteen years. Cyrus had let them return to rebuild the house of the LORD (Ezra 1:1–4), and under Zerubbabel and Joshua they rebuilt the altar and laid the temple’s foundation soon after they came back (Ezra 3:8–13). Then opposition from the peoples around them (Ezra 4:1–5), and their own care for their own houses, brought the work to a halt for about sixteen years. God raised up Haggai and Zechariah to stir them again, and Haggai’s first message was a call to rebuild (Haggai 1:2–11).
“Came the word of the LORD” is the prophets’ usual way of saying that what follows is God’s own speech. The same words open the ministries of Jeremiah (Jeremiah 1:4) and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 1:3). The Hebrew dâbâr means a word or speech, and in a separate sense a matter or thing, and here it is the word God speaks. The name Yᵉhôvâh, written “the LORD”, is God’s covenant name, the name of the God who keeps his promises to Israel and holds his people to account.
The KJV’s “by Haggai” stands for a Hebrew phrase built on yâd, “hand”. The word comes by the prophet’s hand, so Haggai carries the message and the LORD is its source. “The prophet”, nâbîyʼ, marks him as God’s spokesman, one who declares God’s will to his people as well as what is to come. Amos says that the Lord GOD “revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets” (Amos 3:7), and Peter says that “holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost” (2 Peter 1:20–21).
The care over the date matters too. God speaks into a real moment of history, to a particular people on a particular day, with a word fitted to where they stood.
Two questions for the priests
“Thus saith the LORD of hosts” opens the message with God’s own authority. The verb ʼâmar, “saith”, is the ordinary word for saying, telling or commanding, and its weight here comes from the one who speaks. The title “LORD of hosts” joins Yᵉhôvâh to tsâbâʼ, a word for an army or host, for service, and for the host of heaven. Haggai uses the title fourteen times in two short chapters. To a small and discouraged people it said that the God who had called them to build commands every power in heaven and earth, and that he was with them as he had promised (Haggai 2:4–5).
“Ask now the priests concerning the law.” A kôhên is a priest, and the word for law, tôwrâh, comes from yârâh, to teach or instruct. It can mean the whole law of Moses, and here it means the laws of clean and unclean that the priests were charged to apply. God gave the priests this task when he told Aaron’s sons to “put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean”, and to teach Israel his statutes (Leviticus 10:10–11). Hard cases were brought to the priests for judgment (Deuteronomy 17:9–11), and Malachi, a little later, says, “the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth” (Malachi 2:7).
The LORD and his prophet already knew the answers. The questions put the law’s own verdict in the mouths of its appointed teachers, so that what God says next rests on ground everyone in Jerusalem already accepted. There are two questions, and the priests answer each at once.
Can holiness be passed on by touch?
Holiness belongs to what God himself has set apart, and the priests’ answer is that it stays there. “Holy flesh”, bâsâr, is the meat of a sacrifice consecrated to God. Some of it only the priests could eat, and only in a holy place: “All the males among the priests shall eat thereof: it is most holy” (Leviticus 6:29). In Haggai’s case a man carries a piece of it in “the skirt of his garment”. The word kânâph means a wing or an edge, and on a robe it is the flap or hem, here folded to hold the meat.
The law said that whatever touched the flesh of the sin offering would be holy (Leviticus 6:27), so the fold of cloth that held the meat was itself made holy. Haggai asks whether that holiness passes one step further, when the fold touches “bread, or pottage, or wine, or oil, or any meat”. The verb nâgaʻ means to touch or reach, and the priests rule that the food stays common.
So nearness to holy things leaves ordinary things as they were. Handling sacred things, or standing near holy places and holy people, leaves a person as he was. Holiness comes from God, by his own act of setting apart.
Does uncleanness spread?
Uncleanness passes on readily, and the priests say so plainly: “It shall be unclean.” Haggai’s second case is a man “unclean by a dead body”. The Hebrew word there is nephesh, which means a breathing creature, life, soul or person, and here it stands for a dead person. Touching the dead brought one of the heaviest kinds of uncleanness in the law. It lasted seven days and was removed with water mixed with the ashes of a red heifer (Numbers 19), under the law for anyone who touched a dead body (Numbers 19:11–13). The same chapter closes with the rule Haggai’s question turns on: “And whatsoever the unclean person toucheth shall be unclean” (Numbers 19:22).
The word ṭâmêʼ means unclean or defiled, unfit to take part in worship. The verb of touching is the same nâgaʻ as in the first question, and with it the two answers sit side by side. Holiness stays where God puts it, and uncleanness spreads to whatever it touches. It is far easier to become unclean than to become holy. Paul uses the same picture with leaven: “a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump” (Galatians 5:9, 1 Corinthians 5:6). And death, the source of the uncleanness in this case, is what Scripture calls the wages of sin (Romans 6:23).
Why the LORD calls his people unclean
Verse 14 is where the questions were heading: “So is this people, and so is this nation before me, saith the LORD; and so is every work of their hands; and that which they offer there is unclean.” Haggai answers, and the LORD applies the priests’ ruling to the whole community. ʻam, “people”, is the ordinary word for a people bound together, and gôwy, “nation”, is the word most often used of the other nations. Together they take in the whole of Judah, and the repeated “so is” lays each part of its life beside the unclean man of verse 13.
“Every work of their hands” is maʻăseh, a word for a deed, a piece of work or a product. It covers their daily labour, their fields and vineyards, and the houses they had built for themselves. “That which they offer there” means the sacrifices on the altar at Jerusalem, which had stood since the return while the temple lay unbuilt. In the first case holy flesh left the food common, and in the same way their altar and sacrifices left them as they were. In the second case the unclean man defiled all he touched, and in the same way their own condition defiled all they did, their worship included.
The word for unclean is the same ṭâmêʼ the priests used in verse 13. Its roots are in the purity laws, and the LORD uses it here of a people’s whole standing before him. The cause is the one Haggai had already named. They had left God’s house in ruins while they lived in their own: “Is it time for you, O ye, to dwell in your cieled houses, and this house lie waste?” (Haggai 1:4). Their neglect of the temple showed hearts that had put themselves first, and that disobedience reached into everything they touched.
Scripture says the same in many places. “To obey is better than sacrifice” (1 Samuel 15:22), and “The sacrifice of the wicked is abomination” (Proverbs 21:27). Isaiah confesses, “But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags” (Isaiah 64:6). Worship pleases God when it comes from a heart that obeys him, which is why Jesus says, “seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness” (Matthew 6:33).
Looking back on the lean years
“And now, I pray you, consider”. The word “consider” is śîmû lēḇ, from sûwm, to put or set, and lêbâb, the heart, so the people are told to set their hearts on this. The little word rendered “I pray you” turns the command into an earnest plea. In this verse “from this day and upward” leads into a look back over the time “before a stone was laid upon a stone in the temple of the LORD”. A stone, ʼeben, is the simplest unit of building, and the picture is a building site standing idle. The temple is the hêykâl, a word for a palace or temple, a great public building. It was the LORD’s house, and it lay waste while the people finished their own.
Verse 16 shows what those years were like. “When one came to an heap of twenty measures, there were but ten.” A heap, ʻârêm, is a pile of grain, and the man who counted on twenty measures found half. “When one came to the pressfat for to draw out fifty vessels out of the press, there were but twenty.” The pressfat, yeqeb, is the vat below the treading floor of a winepress or olive press, where the juice or oil collected. The verb for drawing out, châsaph, means to strip off or lay bare, and here it is used of drawing off what lay in the vat. Where he looked for fifty vessels he found twenty, a loss of three parts in five. The KJV supplies the words “measures” and “vessels”, and the units in mind were probably dry measures such as the ephah or seah and liquid ones such as the bath or hin. Grain, wine and oil all failed together.
Haggai had told them this already: “Ye have sown much, and bring in little” (Haggai 1:6), “and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes”. The LORD had given the reason: “Ye looked for much, and, lo, it came to little ... Because of mine house that is waste, and ye run every man unto his own house” (Haggai 1:9). The whole of his first message (Haggai 1) sets their poor harvests beside his ruined house.
The LORD who smote and called
Verse 17 names the one who sent the failure: “I smote you with blasting and with mildew and with hail in all the labours of your hands”. nâkâh means to strike or smite, and the LORD says plainly that he did it. Blasting is the scorching that withers grain, mildew is a pale yellow blight that rots it, and hail beats it flat. “The labours of your hands” is the same word maʻăseh as “every work of their hands” in verse 14, so the work God called unclean is the work he struck. Blasting and mildew are named among the curses for disobedience in Deuteronomy 28:22. The law had set this out long before, in the blessings and curses of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, where the harvest rests in God’s hand.
“Yet ye turned not to me” is the heart of the verse. The hardship was meant to bring them back to God, and they kept on as they were. Israel had heard the same words before through Amos: “I have smitten you with blasting and mildew ... yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the LORD” (Amos 4:9). Jeremiah records the same grief: “In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction” (Jeremiah 2:30). The closing “saith the LORD” is nᵉʼum, an utterance or declaration, here God’s own word over their story. He strikes in order to bring his people home.
Does every hard time come as punishment?
Haggai ties these lean years to this people’s neglect of God’s house because the LORD himself says so (Haggai 1:6–11). Scripture gives other reasons for hardship as well: life in a fallen world, with its disasters and failing economies, the wrongs that other people do, and trials that refine faith, as Job’s did. What this passage teaches is that God at times uses want to call his people’s attention back to him, and that when he does, he means it for their good. Our walk with God reaches into every part of life, the harvest included.
From this day will I bless you
Verse 18 says “consider” twice, at its start and at its end, and between them it names a day: “from the four and twentieth day of the ninth month, even from the day that the foundation of the LORD’S temple was laid”. This is the day of the message itself. The ninth month is Kislev, around November and December. The verb yâçad means to set, found or establish, and the verse ties this date to the laying of the foundation. The people had returned to the work three months earlier, and the LORD makes this day the turning point. yôwm, “day”, can also mean a span of time, and here it is one particular day. In this verse “from this day and upward” looks forward, and God draws a line under the past and begins something new.
Verse 19 asks, “Is the seed yet in the barn?” zeraʻ means seed or grain, and the barn, mᵉgûwrâh, is a granary or storehouse. The question can be read two ways: the seed is still in storage and waiting to be sown, or the barn stands empty with no new harvest to fill it. On either reading there is still nothing to show. “Yea, as yet the vine, and the fig tree, and the pomegranate, and the olive tree, hath not brought forth.” The verb nâsâʼ means to lift, bear or carry, and the trees are still bare. With the grain, these trees are among the good things Moses promised of the land itself (Deuteronomy 8:8), signs of God’s favour on his people.
Then comes the promise: “from this day will I bless you.” To bless, bârak, comes from a word for kneeling and means to give good, favour and prosperity. God gives the promise while the fields are bare, so it rests on his word alone. The same LORD who struck their labours now promises to bless them, and the line between the two is this day.
The covenant had always set blessing for obedience (Deuteronomy 28:1–14) beside the curses for disobedience (Deuteronomy 28:15–24). Amos had seen famine sent to call Israel back (Amos 4:6–9). Proverbs promises that those who honour the LORD with their substance will see their barns “filled with plenty” (Proverbs 3:9–10), and Malachi, speaking to the same returned people, tells them that God will open the windows of heaven for those who bring the whole tithe (Malachi 3:8–12). The blessing flows from God’s covenant faithfulness to people who have turned back to him. He is just when he disciplines, and he is quick to bless when his people return.
Christ, who makes the unclean clean
The word of the LORD that came by Haggai came in full in Jesus, the Word who was with God and made all things (John 1:1–3) and who “was made flesh, and dwelt among us” (John 1:14). God, who spoke in times past by the prophets, has spoken to us by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–2), and the people were astonished that Jesus taught “as one having authority” (Matthew 7:28–29). Haggai’s carefully dated word belongs to the God who sent his Son “when the fulness of the time was come” (Galatians 4:4).
The people of Haggai’s day asked earthly priests about the law, and the law was itself “a shadow of good things to come” (Hebrews 10:1). We have a great high priest, Jesus the Son of God, through whom we come boldly to the throne of grace (Hebrews 4:14–16). He came to fulfil the law (Matthew 5:17). Hebrews sets the ashes of a heifer, which sanctified “to the purifying of the flesh”, beside the blood of Christ, which purges the conscience “from dead works to serve the living God” (Hebrews 9:13–14). His people are now a royal priesthood (1 Peter 2:9), and the Spirit of truth guides them into all truth (John 16:13).
Haggai’s two rulings describe a world where holiness stays where God puts it and uncleanness spreads. In Jesus the Holy One touches the unclean and makes it clean. He put forth his hand and touched a leper, “and immediately his leprosy was cleansed” (Matthew 8:1–3, Mark 1:40–42). He touched the eyes of the blind (Matthew 9:29), and he took a dead girl by the hand and raised her (Mark 5:41), reaching into the very uncleanness of Haggai’s second question and bringing life. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His blood cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7), and he presents us holy and unblameable in God’s sight (Colossians 1:22). So God’s word to his people stands: “Be ye holy; for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:15–16), and David’s prayer is ours: “Create in me a clean heart, O God” (Psalm 51:10).
The people of verse 14 could bring only unclean work and unclean offerings. In Christ we are a new creature (2 Corinthians 5:17), found in him with the righteousness which is of God by faith (Philippians 3:9), and built up as lively stones into a spiritual house, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2:5). He bore the smiting we deserved, for “he was wounded for our transgressions” (Isaiah 53:4–5), and he calls all people to repent and believe the gospel (Mark 1:15). Haggai’s hearers kept their old ways under discipline, and God promised a new covenant in which he would write his law in his people’s hearts (Jeremiah 31:33).
Jesus spoke of the temple of his body: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19–21). In him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily (Colossians 2:9), and through him we enter God’s presence by a new and living way (Hebrews 10:19–22). Believers are built together on him, the chief corner stone, into a habitation of God through the Spirit (Ephesians 2:19–22). The barren years of the neglected temple answer to the barrenness of a life away from him. He is the true vine, and those who abide in him bear much fruit (John 15:5), the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22–23). He spoke of himself as a corn of wheat that falls into the ground and dies and brings forth much fruit (John 12:24), and in him God has blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places (Ephesians 1:3).
The God who names the day of blessing
This passage shows us a God who tells his people the truth about themselves. He lets the law speak first, through priests the people trusted, and then he says plainly that their nation, their work and their offerings are unclean before him. It shows us a God who disciplines in order to bring his people home, and who grieves that they “turned not” to him.
It also shows us how ready he is to bless. On the day his people set their hands to his house, he names the date and promises blessing while the barn is still empty and the trees are still bare, so the promise rests on his word alone. Holy things kept close leave us as we are, and in Christ the Holy One himself has touched us and made us clean. The double “consider” of verses 15 and 18 stands over every day God gives, calling us to set our hearts on what he has done and on what he has promised from this day.
Haggai 2:10
“In the four and twentieth day of the ninth month,”
The ninth month is Kislev, around November and December, and the day is the same one verse 18 calls the people to consider.
“in the second year of Darius,”
Darius I of Persia, which places the message in 520 BC.
“came the word of the LORD”
“Came” renders a Hebrew verb meaning to be or to happen, so the word arrives at God’s initiative. dâbâr is the word God speaks, and Yᵉhôvâh is his covenant name.
“by Haggai the prophet, saying,”
“By” rests on yâd, “hand”, and nâbîyʼ is God’s spokesman. “Saying” opens the message that follows.
Haggai 2:11 This verse
“Thus saith the LORD of hosts;”
ʼâmar with the title built on tsâbâʼ, host or army, the God who commands heaven’s hosts.
“Ask now the priests”
The command goes to Haggai, who puts the questions himself in verses 12 and 13. kôhên is the ordinary word for a priest.
“concerning the law, saying,”
tôwrâh is teaching or instruction, and the people want a ruling on a point of the purity laws. “Saying” introduces the two questions.
Haggai 2:12
“If one bear holy flesh in the skirt of his garment,”
bâsâr is sacrificial meat set apart for God, carried in the kânâph, the flap or hem of the robe.
“and with his skirt do touch bread, or pottage, or wine, or oil, or any meat,”
Pottage is a cooked stew, and “meat” in the KJV’s English means food of any kind. The verb is nâgaʻ, to touch.
“shall it be holy? And the priests answered and said, No.”
The priests answer at once, from the law they were appointed to teach.
Haggai 2:13
“Then said Haggai,”
Haggai puts the second question himself, to draw out a ruling he already knows.
“If one that is unclean by a dead body”
The word behind “dead body” is nephesh, here a dead person, the source of one of the law’s heaviest uncleannesses, lasting seven days.
“touch any of these,”
The same foods as verse 12, so the two cases are exactly matched.
“shall it be unclean? And the priests answered and said, It shall be unclean.”
ṭâmêʼ, defiled and unfit for worship. Uncleanness passes on where holiness stayed put.
Haggai 2:14
“Then answered Haggai, and said,”
Haggai now gives the answer to which the questions were leading.
“So is this people, and so is this nation before me, saith the LORD;”
“Before me” makes this God’s own verdict. ʻam and gôwy together take in the whole community.
“and so is every work of their hands;”
maʻăseh, their deeds and the products of their labour, including fields, vineyards and their own houses.
“and that which they offer there is unclean.”
“There” is the altar at Jerusalem, so even their sacrifices carry their uncleanness.
Haggai 2:15
“And now, I pray you, consider”
“And now” turns from the verdict to an earnest plea. śîmû lēḇ means “set your heart”.
“from this day and upward,”
Here the phrase opens a look back over the years before the work began.
“from before a stone was laid upon a stone”
ʼeben, a single building stone, so the picture is a site with no building going on.
“in the temple of the LORD:”
hêykâl, the great house of the LORD, left waste while the people’s own houses stood.
Haggai 2:16
“Since those days were,”
The whole time of neglect, which had gone on for years.
“when one came to an heap of twenty measures, there were but ten:”
The ʻârêm, the grain heap, gave half of what was expected.
“when one came to the pressfat for to draw out fifty vessels out of the press, there were but twenty.”
The yeqeb is the collecting vat, and châsaph is used of drawing its contents off. Fifty became twenty, a loss of three parts in five.
Haggai 2:17
“I smote you”
nâkâh, to strike, and the LORD names himself as the one who struck.
“with blasting and with mildew and with hail”
The Hebrew words are shᵉdêphâh, a scorching that withers, yêrâqôwn, a pale yellow blight, and bârâd, hail. They attacked the crop from every side.
“in all the labours of your hands;”
The same maʻăseh as “every work of their hands” in verse 14.
“yet ye turned not to me, saith the LORD.”
The discipline was meant to turn them back to God. “Saith the LORD” is nᵉʼum, God’s declaration.
Haggai 2:18
“Consider now from this day and upward,”
The same phrase as verse 15, śîmû lēḇ, and this time it looks forward from the day.
“from the four and twentieth day of the ninth month,”
The date of verse 10, the day this word was given. yôwm here is one particular day.
“even from the day that the foundation of the LORD’S temple was laid,”
yâçad, to set or found. God fixes the turning point to the laying of his house’s foundation.
“consider it.”
The command closes the verse as it opened it, framing the day between two calls.
Haggai 2:19
“Is the seed yet in the barn?”
zeraʻ is seed or grain and mᵉgûwrâh a granary. Either the seed is still waiting to be sown or the barn has nothing new in it.
“yea, as yet the vine, and the fig tree, and the pomegranate, and the olive tree, hath not brought forth:”
nâsâʼ, to bear. The four trees of the good land are still bare.
“from this day will I bless you.”
bârak, to give good and favour. The promise comes before any sign of harvest, and it rests on God’s word.
Last revised