What number verse is Ezra 2:51 in the Bible?

Ezra 2:51 is the 12,079th verse of the Bible. Counting straight through the King James canon — all 31,102 verses from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 — Ezra 2:51 sits at position 12,079.

Translation

King James Version

The children of Bakbuk, the children of Hakupha, the children of Harhur,

Ask

KJV (with Strong's)

The children ^H1121 of Bakbuk ^H1227, the children ^H1121 of Hakupha ^H2709, the children ^H1121 of Harhur ^H2744,

Ask

Complete Jewish Bible

descendants of Bakbuk, descendants of Hakufa, descendants of Harhur,

Ask

Berean Standard Bible

the descendants of Bakbuk, the descendants of Hakupha, the descendants of Harhur,

Ask

American Standard Version

the children of Bakbuk, the children of Hakupha, the children of Harhur,

Ask

World English Bible Messianic

the children of Bakbuk, the children of Hakupha, the children of Harhur,

Ask

Geneva Bible (1599)

The sonnes of Bakbuk, the sonnes of Hakupa, the sonnes of Harhur,

Ask

Young's Literal Translation

Sons of Bakbuk, sons of Hakupha, sons of Harhur,

Ask

See on the biblical-era map

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 12,079 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezra 2:51 meticulously records the names of three family groups—Bakbuk, Hakupha, and Harhur—identifying them as "the children of Solomon's servants" who returned to Judah from Babylonian exile. This verse is part of a comprehensive register in Ezra chapter 2, which details the first wave of Jewish returnees under Zerubbabel and Jeshua, highlighting God's faithfulness in restoring His people and the nation's commitment to re-establishing its identity and the temple service in Jerusalem.

CONTEXT

Literary Context: Ezra 2:51 is situated within a detailed census of the Jewish exiles who returned from Babylon to Judah, spanning from Ezra 2:1 to Ezra 2:70. This extensive list meticulously categorizes the returnees by family, city of origin, and their respective roles within the community, including priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and the Nethinim (temple servants). Specifically, verses Ezra 2:43-58 enumerate the "Nethinim" and "the children of Solomon's servants," groups who, though not of Levitical descent, were dedicated to assisting with the temple's maintenance and sacred duties. The inclusion of these specific family names underscores the comprehensive nature of the census and the importance of every group in the re-establishment of the post-exilic community and temple worship. A parallel, though not identical, register is found in Nehemiah 7:6-73, affirming the historical accuracy and significance of these records for the returning remnant.
Historical & Cultural Context: The return described in Ezra 2 occurred in 538 BC, following King Cyrus of Persia's decree (539 BC) that allowed the Jews to return to their homeland and rebuild the temple (Ezra 1:1-4). This event marked a pivotal moment after seventy years of Babylonian captivity, prophesied by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 29:10). The meticulous genealogical records, such as the one in Ezra 2, were culturally vital for the Jewish people. Lineage determined not only tribal affiliation and land claims but also eligibility for sacred roles, especially the priesthood (Ezra 2:61-63). The "children of Solomon's servants" were descendants of foreign captives or those dedicated to temple service during Solomon's reign, who had integrated into the Israelite community and continued their ancestral role of supporting the temple. Their inclusion in the list highlights the diverse composition of the returning community and the re-establishment of all necessary functions for a functioning temple and society.
Key Themes: The names in Ezra 2:51 contribute to several overarching themes in the book of Ezra. Firstly, Identity and Lineage are paramount; the detailed genealogies served to authenticate who belonged to the covenant community, ensuring proper tribal and family affiliations for land distribution and, crucially, for priestly and Levitical service. Secondly, the return of these families signifies Restoration and Fulfillment of God's prophetic promises, demonstrating His faithfulness to His covenant people by bringing them back to the land after judgment. Each name listed, no matter how seemingly minor, represents a tangible step in the rebuilding of the nation and the temple. Lastly, the meticulousness of the record-keeping, including even the "children of Solomon's servants," underscores Divine Meticulousness and Inclusivity. It reveals God's comprehensive plan and His attention to every individual and group involved in His redemptive purposes, emphasizing that no one is overlooked in His grand design for the restoration of Israel, echoing the sentiment of Psalm 139:16.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

children (Hebrew, bên, H1121): From the root meaning "to build," this word signifies a son, but in its widest sense, it refers to a descendant, a member of a family or clan, or even a subject or nation. In Ezra 2:51, its repeated use emphasizes the collective, familial identity of the groups returning from exile, highlighting that the restoration was not merely of individuals but of established family units, reinforcing the importance of lineage and communal solidarity in the post-exilic society.
Bakbuk (Hebrew, Baqbûwq, H1227): This proper noun identifies one of the Nethinim families. Its etymological root is the same as the word for "bottle" or "flask." While the literal meaning of the name might offer a minor curiosity, its primary significance lies in its function as a unique identifier for a specific family or clan among the "children of Solomon's servants." Its inclusion in the meticulous list signifies their distinct identity and their contribution to the returning remnant, regardless of their specific origins or the symbolic meaning of their name.
Hakupha (Hebrew, Chăqûwphâʼ, H2709): This proper noun refers to another family among the Nethinim. Derived from an unused root likely meaning "to bend" or "crooked," the name's etymology is less important than its role in precisely identifying a segment of the returning exiles. The meticulous recording of such distinct family names underscores the administrative precision and the communal importance of lineage in the re-establishment of the Jewish state and its religious institutions.

Verse Breakdown

"The children of Bakbuk": This clause introduces the first of three specific family units identified in this verse. As descendants of "Solomon's servants," this group likely inherited responsibilities related to the maintenance and service of the temple. Their inclusion signifies that even those whose lineage was not priestly or Levitical, but who had historically served the temple, were vital to the re-establishment of religious life in Jerusalem.
"the children of Hakupha": Following the same pattern, this clause names a second distinct family group. The repetition of "the children of" reinforces the emphasis on familial identity and the communal nature of the return. These families, though perhaps of non-Israelite origin initially, had become integral to the temple's functioning and were now counted among the returning remnant, demonstrating the inclusive nature of God's redemptive plan for His people.
"the children of Harhur": The final clause in this verse names the third family group. The listing of these specific names, rather than a generic description, underscores the meticulousness of the census and the importance of each family's contribution to the restoration. Their return was not incidental but a deliberate part of God's plan to reconstitute His people and their worship, highlighting that every part of the community, even those in supporting roles, was valued and necessary.

Literary Devices

Ezra 2:51, typical of the broader chapter, primarily employs Catalog and Repetition. The entire chapter is essentially a Catalog or a detailed list of names and numbers, systematically enumerating the returning exiles. This device serves to provide a comprehensive and verifiable record, emphasizing the historical accuracy and the tangible reality of the return. Within this catalog, the phrase "the children of" is an instance of Repetition, which not only clarifies the familial structure but also creates a rhythmic, almost litany-like effect. This repetition underscores the importance of lineage and collective identity in the post-exilic community. Furthermore, the very act of listing these names, seemingly mundane, serves as a form of Emphasis, highlighting that every family, no matter how seemingly minor their role (like the "children of Solomon's servants"), was significant in God's plan for restoration. Their inclusion ensures that no one is forgotten in the divine accounting of the remnant.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezra 2:51, though a simple listing of names, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous care for His people and the comprehensive nature of His redemptive plan. The inclusion of these specific families, identified as "children of Solomon's servants," highlights that God's restoration extends beyond the prominent priestly or royal lines to encompass all who are part of His covenant community, including those in supporting roles. It underscores the theme of divine faithfulness in fulfilling prophetic promises of return and rebuilding, demonstrating that every individual and family, no matter their perceived status, has a place and purpose in God's grand narrative. This detailed record-keeping reflects God's intimate knowledge of each person and His commitment to reconstituting His people as a whole, preparing them for renewed worship and obedience.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezra 2:51 invites us to consider the profound significance of individual and communal identity within God's overarching plan. Just as these families, even those in less prominent roles, were meticulously recorded and integral to the restoration of Israel, so too is every believer a valued and indispensable part of God's ongoing work in the world. This verse reminds us that God sees, knows, and values each one of us, not merely as an anonymous part of a crowd, but as a unique individual with a specific place and purpose in His kingdom. It challenges us to embrace our unique contributions, no matter how small they may seem, recognizing that every act of service, every commitment to community, and every step of obedience contributes to the greater narrative of God's redemptive purposes. Our names, like those in Ezra, are known to God, and our participation matters.

Questions for Reflection

How does the meticulous listing of names in Ezra 2, including those in supporting roles, challenge my perception of what is "important" in God's kingdom?
In what ways do I see myself as a "child of God's servants," contributing to His work even in seemingly small or overlooked capacities?
How does the emphasis on lineage and identity in Ezra encourage me to consider my own spiritual heritage and my place within the family of God?
What does God's faithfulness in restoring these families teach me about His commitment to fulfilling His promises in my own life?

FAQ

Why are these specific names important if they are just part of a long list?

Answer: While seemingly just a list, the inclusion of these specific names—Bakbuk, Hakupha, and Harhur—is profoundly important for several reasons. Firstly, it underscores the meticulousness of the biblical record, affirming the historical accuracy and verifiability of the return from exile. This precision lends credibility to the entire narrative of God's faithfulness. Secondly, these names represent distinct family units among "the children of Solomon's servants," a group dedicated to temple support. Their inclusion highlights that the restoration of Israel was comprehensive, involving not just priests and Levites, but all who had a role in the community and its worship. It emphasizes that every individual and family, regardless of their perceived status or origin, was vital to the rebuilding of the nation and the temple. This demonstrates God's attention to detail and His valuing of every participant in His redemptive plan, ensuring no one was overlooked in the divine accounting of the returning remnant, a theme echoed in Psalm 147:4.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous register of returning exiles in Ezra 2, including the "children of Bakbuk, Hakupha, and Harhur," foreshadows the ultimate gathering and restoration of God's people in Christ. Just as these names were recorded for the physical rebuilding of the temple and the nation, so too are the names of all believers "written in the Lamb's book of life" (Revelation 21:27). The physical return from Babylon, a testament to God's faithfulness to His Old Covenant promises, points to the spiritual return from the bondage of sin accomplished by Jesus Christ. He is the true Temple (John 2:19-21), whose body is the church, composed of all who are called by His name, regardless of their earthly lineage or status (Galatians 3:28). The meticulous inclusion of even "Solomon's servants" in Ezra's list speaks to the radical inclusivity of the New Covenant, where Christ breaks down all dividing walls (Ephesians 2:14) and gathers a people from every tribe and nation to serve Him (Revelation 7:9-10). In Christ, every believer is not merely a servant but a child of God, perfectly known and eternally secured in the heavenly register (Hebrews 12:23), a testament to the comprehensive and personal nature of His redemptive work.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezra 2 verses 36–63

36 ¶ The priests: the children of Jedaiah, of the house of Jeshua, nine hundred seventy and three.

37 The children of Immer, a thousand fifty and two.

38 The children of Pashur, a thousand two hundred forty and seven.

39 The children of Harim, a thousand and seventeen.

40 The Levites: the children of Jeshua and Kadmiel, of the children of Hodaviah, seventy and four.

41 The singers: the children of Asaph, an hundred twenty and eight.

42 The children of the porters: the children of Shallum, the children of Ater, the children of Talmon, the children of Akkub, the children of Hatita, the children of Shobai, in all an hundred thirty and nine.

43 The Nethinims: the children of Ziha, the children of Hasupha, the children of Tabbaoth,

44 The children of Keros, the children of Siaha, the children of Padon,

45 The children of Lebanah, the children of Hagabah, the children of Akkub,

46 The children of Hagab, the children of Shalmai, the children of Hanan,

47 The children of Giddel, the children of Gahar, the children of Reaiah,

48 The children of Rezin, the children of Nekoda, the children of Gazzam,

49 The children of Uzza, the children of Paseah, the children of Besai,

50 The children of Asnah, the children of Mehunim, the children of Nephusim,

51 The children of Bakbuk, the children of Hakupha, the children of Harhur,

52 The children of Bazluth, the children of Mehida, the children of Harsha,

53 The children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Thamah,

54 The children of Neziah, the children of Hatipha.

55 The children of Solomon's servants: the children of Sotai, the children of Sophereth, the children of Peruda,

56 The children of Jaalah, the children of Darkon, the children of Giddel,

57 The children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth of Zebaim, the children of Ami.

58 All the Nethinims, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two.

59 And these were they which went up from Telmelah, Telharsa, Cherub, Addan, and Immer: but they could not shew their father's house, and their seed, whether they were of Israel:

60 The children of Delaiah, the children of Tobiah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred fifty and two.

61 And of the children of the priests: the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name:

62 These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood.

63 And the Tirshatha said unto them, that they should not eat of the most holy things, till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim.

Here is an account, I. Of the priests that returned, and they were a considerable number, about a tenth part of the whole company: for the whole were above 42,000 (Ezr 2:64), and four families of priests made up above 4200 (Ezr 2:36-39); thus was the tenth God's part - a blessed decimation. Three of the fathers of the priests here named were heads of courses, Ch1 24:7, Ch1 24:8, Ch1 24:14. The fourth was Pashur, v. 38. If these were of the posterity of that Pashur that abused Jeremiah (Jer 20:1), it is strange that so bad a man should have so good a seed, and so numerous.

II. Of the Levites. I cannot but wonder at the small number of them, for, taking in both the singers and the porters (Ezr 2:40-42), they did not make 350. Time was when the Levites were more forward to their duty than the priests (Ch2 29:34), but they were not so now. If one place, one family, has the reputation for pious zeal now, another may have it another time. The wind blows where it listeth, and shifts its points.

III. Of the Nethinim, who, it is supposed, were the Gibeonites, given (so their name signifies) by Joshua first (Jos 9:27), and again by David (Ezr 8:20), when Saul had expelled them, to be employed by the Levites in the work of God's house as hewers of wood and drawers of water; and, with them, of the children of Solomon's servants, whom he gave for the like use (whether they were Jews or Gentiles does not appear) and who were here taken notice of among the retainers of the temple and numbered with the Nethinim, Ezr 2:55, Ezr 2:58. Note, It is an honour to belong to God's house, though in the meanest office there.

IV. Of some that were looked upon as Israelites by birth, and others as priests, and yet could not make out a clear title to the honour. 1. There were some that could not prove themselves Israelites (Ezr 2:59, Ezr 2:60), a considerable number, who presumed they were of the seed of Jacob, but could not produce their pedigrees, and yet would go up to Jerusalem, having an affection to the house and people of God. These shamed those who were true-born Israelites, and yet were not called Israelites indeed, who came out of the waters of Judah (Isa 48:1), but had lost the relish of those waters. 2. There were others that could not prove themselves priests, and yet were supposed to be of the seed of Aaron. What is not preserved in black and white will, in all likelihood, be forgotten in a little time. Now we are here told, (1.) How they lost their evidence. One of their ancestors married a daughter of Barzillai, that great man whom we read of in David's time; he gloried in an alliance to that honourable family, and, preferring that before the dignity of his priesthood, would have his children called after Barzillai's family, and their pedigree preserved in the registers of that house, not of the house of Aaron, and so they lost it. In Babylon there was nothing to be got by the priesthood, and therefore they cared not for being akin to it. Those who think their ministry, or their relation to ministers, a diminution or disparagement to them, forget who it was that said, I magnify my office. (2.) What they lost with it. It could not be taken for granted that they were priests when they could not produce their proofs, but they were, as polluted, put from the priesthood. Now that the priests had recovered their rights, and had the altar to live upon again, they would gladly be looked upon as priests. But they had sold their birthright for the honour of being gentlemen, and therefore were justly degraded, and forbidden to eat of the most holy things. Note, Christ will be ashamed of those that are ashamed of him and his service. It was the tirshatha, or governor, that put them under this sequestration, which some understand of Zerubbabel the present governor, others of Nehemiah (who is so called, Neh 8:9, Neh 10:1, and who gave this order when he came some years after); but the prohibition was not absolute, it was only a suspension, till there should be a high priest with Urim and Thummin, by whom they might know God's mind in this matter. This, it seems, was expected and desired, but it does not appear that ever they were blessed with it under the second temple. They had the canon of the Old Testament complete, which was better than Urim; and, by the want of that oracle, they were taught to expect the Messiah the great Oracle, which the Urim and Thummim was but a type of. Nor does it appear that the second temple had the ark in it, either the old one or a new one. Those shadows by degrees vanished, as the substance approached; and God, by the prophet, intimates to his people that they should sustain no damage by the want of the ark, Jer 3:16, Jer 3:17. In those days, when they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord, and all the nations shall be gathered to it, they shall say no more, The ark of the covenant of the Lord, neither shall it come to mind, for they shall do very well without it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 36–63. Public domain.

Copy as

Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 2:51 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.