Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And thou shalt kill the bullock before the LORD, by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And thou shalt kill H7819 the bullock H6499 before H6440 the LORD H3068, by the door H6607 of the tabernacle H168 of the congregation H4150.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and you are to slaughter the bull in the presence of ADONAI at the entrance to the tent of meeting.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And you shall slaughter the bull before the LORD at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting.
Ask
American Standard Version
And thou shalt kill the bullock before Jehovah, at the door of the tent of meeting.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
You shall kill the bull before the LORD, at the door of the Tent of Meeting.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
So thou shalt kill the calfe before the Lord, at the doore of the Tabernacle of the Congregation.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And thou hast slaughtered the bullock before Jehovah, at the opening of the tent of meeting,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 2,348 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Exodus 29:11 details a foundational act within the consecration ceremony for Aaron and his sons, the inaugural priests of Israel: the ritual slaughter of a bullock as a sin offering. This pivotal event, performed directly "before the LORD" at the entrance of the Tabernacle, underscores the absolute necessity of purification and atonement for those who would mediate between a holy God and His covenant people, establishing a divine precedent for sacred service and access to His presence.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Exodus 29 is entirely devoted to the meticulous divine instructions for the ordination of Aaron and his sons into the priesthood, a critical transition following the detailed blueprints for the Tabernacle's construction and furnishings in Exodus 25, Exodus 26, Exodus 27, Exodus 28. This chapter marks the shift from building the sacred space to consecrating the personnel who would minister within it. The bullock mentioned in Exodus 29:11 is explicitly identified in Exodus 29:14 as the sin offering, the very first sacrifice in a multi-stage, seven-day consecration process that also includes a burnt offering and an ordination offering. This sequence emphasizes that even those chosen by God for the highest spiritual office must first be cleansed and made holy, acknowledging their inherent sinfulness and the indispensable role of atonement before they could approach God's presence and perform their sacred duties. The placement of this sin offering at the very beginning of the ritual underscores its foundational importance for all subsequent acts of worship and mediation.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical setting is the wilderness, where the recently liberated Israelites are being formally constituted as God's covenant nation. The Tabernacle, as commanded in Exodus 25:8, was designed to be Yahweh's portable dwelling place among His people, serving as the central hub of their worship and the tangible manifestation of His presence. In the ancient Near East, priests commonly served as intermediaries between deities and people, but Israel's priesthood was unique in its divine appointment, its strict requirements for ritual and moral purity, and its singular focus on the worship of the one true God, Yahweh. While animal sacrifice was a widespread practice across cultures for appeasing deities or atoning for wrongdoing, in Israel, it was a divinely ordained system, meticulously detailed by God Himself. This system uniquely pointed to the absolute holiness of Yahweh and the necessity of a blood sacrifice for atonement, a principle later articulated in Leviticus 17:11. Performing the sacrifice "by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation" was profoundly significant, as this was the designated threshold, the liminal space between the profane camp and the sacred dwelling of God, emphasizing that access to His immediate presence required a divinely prescribed act of purification and atonement.
  • Key Themes: Exodus 29:11 contributes significantly to several major theological themes prevalent throughout the book of Exodus and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully establishes the theme of Divine Holiness and Human Sinfulness. The requirement for a sin offering for the priests themselves highlights that even those specially chosen by God are inherently sinful and cannot approach His unblemished holiness without prior cleansing. Secondly, it underscores the Necessity of Atonement and Substitution. The killing of the bullock as a sin offering introduces the foundational concept that sin demands a life, and that an innocent substitute must die to cover the guilt of another. This principle is central to the entire sacrificial system and foreshadows future theological developments. Thirdly, the verse exemplifies the theme of Divine Ordinance and Authority. Every detail of the consecration, including the specific animal and location, is divinely commanded, emphasizing that access to God and participation in His service are not based on human innovation or merit, but solely on His prescribed methods and sovereign will. Finally, it reinforces the theme of Mediation and Preparation for Service, illustrating that those who would mediate between God and His people must themselves be set apart and purified according to God's exacting standards, thereby ensuring the sanctity of their role and the integrity of their worship.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • shâchaṭ (Hebrew, shâchaṭ, H7819): This primitive root means "to slaughter (in sacrifice or massacre)." In the context of Exodus 29:11, it specifically refers to the ritualistic killing of the bullock for the purpose of sacrifice. This term emphasizes the violent, life-ending nature of the act, which was essential for atonement. It signifies the taking of an innocent life as a substitute, underscoring the gravity of sin and the costly payment required for its expiation. The precise nature of this "slaughter" was crucial for the blood ritual that followed, as the shedding of blood was central to the concept of atonement in the Old Covenant.
  • par (Hebrew, par, H6499): This term denotes "a bullock (apparently as breaking forth in wild strength, or perhaps as dividing the hoof); ([phrase] young) bull(-ock), calf, ox." The selection of a bullock, a young male bovine, for the sin offering of the priests signifies a valuable and unblemished animal, typically representing a substantial and costly sacrifice. In the Mosaic Law, bullocks were often specified for sin offerings for high-ranking individuals or the entire congregation, indicating the seriousness of the sin being atoned for and the high status of those being consecrated. Its strength and vitality implicitly point to the significant nature of the offering required to cover the weight of sin.
  • pânîym (Hebrew, pânîym, H6440): This plural noun, though always singular in usage, means "the face (as the part that turns)." When used with a prepositional prefix, as it is here ("before the LORD"), it functions as a preposition meaning "before," "in the presence of," or "in the sight of." This emphasizes that the act of killing the bullock was not merely a physical ritual but was performed under the direct, conscious observation and scrutiny of God Himself. It signifies divine observation, approval, and the profound sacredness of the ritual. This highlights the accountability of the priests and the divine authority underpinning the entire consecration process, demanding utmost reverence and precision.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And thou shalt kill the bullock": This is a direct divine command to Moses, initiating the first and most critical act of the consecration ceremony for Aaron and his sons. The "killing" (slaughtering) of the bullock signifies the termination of an innocent life, serving as a substitute for the lives of those being consecrated. As a sin offering, it underscores that even those chosen for sacred service are inherently sinful and require a blood sacrifice for purification before they can approach a holy God. This act is foundational to the Old Testament concept of substitutionary atonement, where the penalty for sin is transferred to an unblemished victim.
  • "before the LORD": This phrase specifies the divine audience and ultimate recipient of the sacrifice. It signifies that the act was not a mere human ritual but an offering presented directly to Yahweh, under His watchful eye and by His express command. This emphasizes the absolute holiness of God and the seriousness of the consecration. It implies that the ritual, when performed according to divine instructions, would be accepted and validated by God, establishing the legitimacy of the priesthood and their future ministry. It stresses the accountability of Aaron and his sons to God alone.
  • "[by] the door of the tabernacle of the congregation": This clause precisely designates the physical location for the sacrifice. The "door" or entrance to the Tabernacle (literally, "Tent of Meeting") was the divinely appointed threshold between the profane outer camp and the sacred inner dwelling place of God. Performing the sin offering at this specific point underscored that atonement was the indispensable prerequisite for entering God's presence and for commencing sacred ministry. It was a public and visible act, signifying the public setting apart of the priests and the communal nature of their service, which facilitated the congregation's access to God through their mediation. This location powerfully communicates that access to God is not arbitrary but is granted only through a divinely ordained pathway, marked by purification.

Literary Devices

Exodus 29:11 is rich in Symbolism and functions as a foundational Ritual within the larger narrative of Israel's covenant with God. The "bullock" itself is a potent symbol of substitutionary atonement, representing an innocent life given in place of the guilty, a principle that permeates the entire sacrificial system. Its unblemished nature symbolizes the purity required for an acceptable offering, reflecting the perfect standard of God. The act of "killing" (slaughtering) is a stark symbol of the cost of sin and the necessity of blood-shedding for the remission of sins, a theme echoed throughout the Old Testament and culminating in the New. The location, "the door of the tabernacle of the congregation," is highly symbolic, representing the sole divinely appointed point of access to God's presence. It functions as a threshold, emphasizing that entry into sacred space and service is not automatic but mediated by specific, divinely ordained acts of purification. The entire consecration ceremony, of which this verse is a part, is a meticulously detailed Ritual, emphasizing order, divine authority, and the repetitive nature of Old Covenant atonement. This ritualistic precision underscores God's holiness and His demand for an orderly and pure approach to His presence. Furthermore, the entire sacrificial system, encapsulated in this verse, serves as Foreshadowing, pointing forward to the ultimate, perfect sacrifice that would one day fulfill and supersede these temporary provisions.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Exodus 29:11 is profoundly significant for understanding core theological principles foundational to biblical revelation. It unequivocally establishes the absolute holiness of God and the inherent sinfulness of humanity, even those chosen for the most sacred service. The bullock, offered as a sin offering, underscores the non-negotiable necessity of atonement—that sin demands a life, and that without the shedding of blood, there is no remission. This verse, therefore, lays crucial groundwork for the concept of substitutionary atonement, where an innocent life is given to cover the guilt of another, a principle that runs through the entire biblical narrative. It also highlights the principle of divine ordinance: access to God and participation in His service are not based on human merit, innovation, or self-appointment, but solely on His prescribed methods and sovereign call. The meticulous details of the ritual emphasize God's sovereignty, His demand for reverence, and His insistence on obedience in all matters of worship and approach to His presence.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Exodus 29:11, though describing an ancient ritual, offers profound and enduring insights for believers today, bridging the gap between Old Covenant practices and New Covenant realities. It powerfully reminds us of God's unchangeable holiness and the absolute necessity of atonement for sin. We no longer offer animal sacrifices, for Jesus Christ has perfectly fulfilled the entire sacrificial system through His singular, once-for-all offering on the cross. His blood is the ultimate and eternal sin offering, granting us direct and bold access to God's presence, as beautifully articulated in Hebrews 10:19-20. This verse also calls us to a life of holiness in service. As New Testament believers, we are called a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9), not to offer animal sacrifices, but to present our lives as "living sacrifices" (Romans 12:1), offering spiritual sacrifices of praise, worship, and obedience. The meticulousness and gravity of the Old Testament ritual should instill in us a deep reverence for God and a commitment to approach Him with purity of heart, relying always on the cleansing power of Christ's blood and His finished work. Our access is not earned, but graciously given through His perfect sacrifice.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous nature of this ancient ritual inform your understanding of God's holiness and His requirements for worship today?
  • In what ways do you, as a believer, participate in a "royal priesthood" and offer "spiritual sacrifices" in your daily life?
  • How does the ultimate fulfillment of this sacrifice in Christ deepen your appreciation for His atoning work and your confident access to God?

FAQ

Why was a bullock chosen for this specific sacrifice?

Answer: The bullock was chosen because it represented a valuable, unblemished, and substantial offering, signifying the high cost and seriousness of the sin offering required for the consecration of the priests. In the Mosaic Law, specific animals were prescribed for different types of offerings and for individuals of varying status. A bullock was typically required for the sin offering of a high priest or the entire congregation (Leviticus 4:3, Leviticus 4:14), reflecting the gravity of the sin and the importance of the individuals being purified. Its strength and purity made it a fitting representation of the significant atonement needed for those who would serve in God's holy presence, emphasizing that the offering must be worthy of the God it is presented to.

What is the significance of the "door of the tabernacle of the congregation" as the location for the sacrifice?

Answer: The location "by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation" is highly significant because it was the designated point of access to God's dwelling place among His people. The Tabernacle was the "Tent of Meeting" where God had promised to meet with Israel, and its entrance served as the threshold between the common and the sacred. Performing the sacrifice at this entrance underscored that purification and atonement were absolutely essential prerequisites for approaching God's presence and for commencing sacred ministry. It was a public act, demonstrating to the entire congregation that even their mediators, the priests, required cleansing before they could facilitate the people's access to God. This location emphasized that there is a divinely ordained way to approach a holy God, and that way is through prescribed atonement.

How does this Old Testament ritual relate to New Testament believers?

Answer: This Old Testament ritual, while no longer practiced, is profoundly relevant to New Testament believers as it serves as a powerful foreshadowing and illuminating backdrop for the work of Jesus Christ. The bullock, as a sin offering, points directly to Jesus as the ultimate and perfect sacrifice for sin, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. The need for the priests to be purified before service highlights the absolute holiness of God and the necessity of cleansing from sin, which Christ perfectly accomplished for us. The sacrifice at the Tabernacle door, the point of access, prefigures Christ's body as the "new and living way" through which believers now have direct access to God's presence (Hebrews 10:19-20). While the ritual was temporary and had to be repeated, Christ's sacrifice was once-for-all, providing eternal redemption and making us a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9) who can draw near to God with confidence and boldness.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Exodus 29:11, detailing the sacrifice of the bullock as a sin offering for the consecration of the priests, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The bullock, an unblemished animal whose innocent life was given to atone for sin, powerfully prefigures Christ, the spotless Lamb of God who offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice. Just as the Old Testament priests needed purification before they could minister, Christ, our eternal High Priest, was Himself without sin (Hebrews 4:15), yet He became sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21) to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. The sacrifice performed "by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation," the very point of access to God's presence, is profoundly fulfilled in Christ's bodily sacrifice on the cross, which tore the temple veil from top to bottom (Matthew 27:51) and opened a new and living way for all believers to draw near to God's throne of grace with confidence (Hebrews 10:19-20). Unlike the repeated sacrifices of the Old Covenant, which could never truly take away sins, Christ's single, perfect offering of Himself "once for all" (Hebrews 10:10) forever sanctifies those who believe, providing eternal redemption (Hebrews 9:12) and rendering all animal sacrifices obsolete. He is both the perfect sacrifice and the perfect High Priest who perpetually intercedes for us, making us holy and acceptable in God's sight, enabling us to approach God not through animal blood, but through His own precious blood.

Copy as

Commentary on Exodus 29 verses 1–37

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here is, I. The law concerning the consecration of Aaron and his sons to the priest's office, which was to be done with a great deal of ceremony and solemnity, that they themselves might be duly affected with the greatness of the work to which they were called, and that the people also might learn to magnify the office and none might dare to invade it.

1.The ceremonies wherewith it was to be done were very fully and particularly appointed, because nothing of this kind had been done before, and because it was to be a statute for ever that the high priest should be thus inaugurated. Now,

(1.)The work to be done was the consecrating of the persons whom God had chosen to be priests, by which they devoted and gave up themselves to the service of God and God declared his acceptance of them; and the people were made to know that they glorified not themselves to be made priests, but were called of God, Heb 5:4, Heb 5:5. They were thus distinguished from common men, sequestered from common services, and set apart for God and an immediate attendance on him. Note, All that are to be employed for God are to be sanctified to him. The person must first be accepted, and then the performance. The Hebrew phrase for consecrating is filling the hand (Exo 29:9): Thou shalt fill the hand of Aaron and his sons, and the ram of consecration is the ram of fillings, Exo 29:22, Exo 29:26. The consecrating of them was the perfecting of them; Christ is said to be perfect or consecrated for evermore, Heb 7:28. Probably the phrase here is borrowed from the putting of the sacrifice into their hand, to be waved before the Lord, Exo 29:24. But it intimates, [1.] That ministers have their hands full; they have no time to trifle, so great, so copious, so constant is their work. [2.] That they must have their hands filled. Of necessity they must have something to offer, and they cannot find it in themselves, it must be given them from above. They cannot fill the people's hearts unless God fill their hands; to him therefore they must go, and receive from his fulness.

(2.)The person to do it was Moses, by God's appointment. Though he was ordained for men, yet the people were not to consecrate him; Moses the servant of the Lord, and his agent herein, must do it. By God's special appointment he now did the priest's work, and therefore that which was the priest's part of the sacrifice was here ordered to be his, Exo 29:26.

(3.)The place was at the door of the tabernacle of meeting, Exo 29:4. God was pleased to dwell in the tabernacle, the people attending in the courts, so that the door between the court and the tabernacle was the fittest place for those to be consecrated in who were to mediate between God and man, and to stand between both, and lay their hands (as it were) upon both. They were consecrated at the door, for they were to be door-keepers.

(4.)It was done with many ceremonies.

[1.]They were to be washed (Exo 29:4), signifying that those must be clean who bear the vessels of the Lord, Isa 52:11. Those that would perfect holiness must cleanse themselves from all filthiness of flesh and spirit, Co2 7:1; Isa 1:16-18. They were now washed all over; but afterwards, when they went in to minister, they washed only their hands and feet (Exo 30:19); for he that is washed needs no more, Joh 13:10.

[2.]They were to be clothed with the holy garments (Exo 29:5, Exo 29:6, Exo 29:8, Exo 29:9), to signify that it was not sufficient for them to put away the pollutions of sin, but they must put on the graces of the Spirit, be clothed with righteousness, Psa 132:9. They must be girded, as men prepared and strengthened for their work; and they must be robed and crowned, as men that counted their work and office their true honour.

[3.]The high priest was to be anointed with the holy anointing oil (Exo 29:7), that the church might be filled and delighted with the sweet savour of his administrations (for ointment and perfume rejoice the heart), and in token of the pouring out of the Spirit upon him, to qualify him for his work. Brotherly love is compared to this oil with which Aaron was anointed, Psa 133:2. The inferior priests are said to be anointed (Exo 30:30), not on their heads, as the high priest (Lev 21:10), the oil was only mingled with the blood that was sprinkled upon their garments.

[4.]Sacrifices were to be offered for them. The covenant of priesthood, as all other covenants, must be made by sacrifice.

First, There must be a sin-offering, to make atonement for them, Exo 29:10-14. The law made those priests that had infirmity, and therefore they must first offer for their own sin, before they could make atonement for the people, Heb 7:27, Heb 7:28. They were to put their hand on the head of their sacrifice (Exo 29:10), confessing that they deserved to die for their own sin, and desiring that the killing of the beast might expiate their guilt, and be accepted as a vicarious satisfaction. It was used as other sin-offerings were; only, whereas the flesh of other sin-offerings was eaten by the priests (Lev 10:18), in token of the priest's taking away the sin of the people, this was appointed to be all burnt without the camp (Exo 29:14), to signify the imperfection of the legal dispensation (as the learned bishop Patrick notes); for the sins of the priests themselves could not be taken away by those sacrifices, but they must expect a better high priest and a better sacrifice.

Secondly, There must be a burnt-offering, a ram wholly burnt, to the honour of God, in token of the dedication of themselves wholly to God and to his service, as living sacrifices, kindled with the fire and ascending in the flame of holy love, Exo 29:15-18. The sin-offering must first be offered and then the burnt-offering; for, till guilt be removed, no acceptable service can be performed, Isa 6:7.

Thirdly, There must be a peace-offering; it is called the ram of consecration, because there was more in this peculiar to the occasion than in the other two. In the burnt-offering God had the glory of their priesthood, in this they had the comfort of it; and, in token of a mutual covenant between God and them, 1. The blood of the sacrifice was divided between God and them (Exo 29:20, Exo 29:21); part of the blood was sprinkled upon the altar round about, and part put upon them, upon their bodies (Exo 29:20), and upon their garments, Exo 29:21. Thus the benefit of the expiation made by the sacrifice was applied and assured to them, and their whole selves from head to foot sanctified to the service of God. The blood was put upon the extreme parts of the body, to signify that it was all, as it were, enclosed and taken in for God, the tip of the ear and the great toe not excepted. We reckon that the blood and oil sprinkled upon garments spot and stain them; yet the holy oil, and the blood of the sacrifice, sprinkled upon their garments, must be looked upon as the greatest adorning imaginable to them, for they signified the blood of Christ, and the graces of the Spirit, which constitute and complete the beauty of holiness, and recommend us to God; we read of robes made white with the blood of the Lamb. 2. The flesh of the sacrifice, with the meat-offering annexed to it, was likewise divided between God and them, that (to speak with reverence) God and they might feast together, in token of friendship and fellowship. (1.) Part of it was to be first waved before the Lord, and then burnt upon the altar; part of the flesh (Exo 29:22), part of the bread, for bread and flesh must go together (Exo 29:23); these were first put into the hands of Aaron to be waved to and fro, in token of their being offered to God (who, though unseen, yet compasses us round on every side), and then they were to be burnt upon the altar (Exo 29:24, Exo 29:25), for the altar was to devour God's part of the sacrifice. Thus God admitted Aaron and his sons to be his servants, and wait at his table, taking the mat of his altar from their hands. Here, in a parenthesis, as it were, comes in the law concerning the priests' part of the peace-offerings afterwards, the breast and shoulder, which were now divided; Moses had the breast, and the shoulder was burnt on the altar with God's part, Exo 29:26-28. (2.) The other part, both of the flesh of the ram and of the bread, Aaron and his sons were to eat at the door of the tabernacle (Exo 29:31-33), to signify that he called them not only servants but friends, Joh 15:15. He supped with them, and they with him. Their eating of the things wherewith the atonement was made signified their receiving the atonement, as the expression is (Rom 5:11), their thankful acceptance of the benefit of it, and their joyful communion with God thereupon, which was the true intent and meaning of a feast upon a sacrifice. If any of it was left, it must be burnt, that it might not be in any danger of putrefying, and to show that it was an extraordinary peace-offering.

2.The time that was to be spent in this consecration: Seven days shalt thou consecrate them, Exo 29:35. Though all the ceremonies were performed on the first day, yet, (1.) They were not to look upon their consecration as completed till the seven days' end, which put a solemnity upon their admission, and a distance between this and their former state, and obliged them to enter upon their work with a pause, giving them time to consider the weight and seriousness of it. This was to be observed in after-ages, Exo 29:30. He that was to succeed Aaron in the high-priesthood must put on the holy garments seven days together, in token of a deliberate and gradual advance into his office, and that one sabbath might pass over him in his consecration. (2.) Every day of the seven, in this first consecration, a bullock was to be offered for a sin-offering (Exo 29:36), which was to intimate to them, [1.] That it was of very great concern to them to get their sins pardoned, and that though atonement was made, and they had the comfort of it, yet they must still keep up a penitent sense of sin and often repeat the confession of it. [2.] That those sacrifices which were thus offered day by day to make atonement could not make the comers thereunto perfect, for then they would have ceased to be offered, as the apostle argues, Heb 10:1, Heb 10:2. They must therefore expect the bringing in of a better hope.

3.This consecration of the priests was a shadow of good things to come. (1.) Our Lord Jesus is the great high-priest of our profession, called of God to be so, consecrated for evermore, anointed with the Spirit above his fellows (whence he is called Messiah, the Christ), clothed with the holy garments, even with glory and beauty, sanctified by his own blood, not that of bullocks and rams (Heb 9:12), made perfect, or consecrated, through sufferings, Heb 2:10. Thus in him this was a perpetual statute, Exo 29:9. (2.) All believers are spiritual priests, to offer spiritual sacrifices (Pe1 2:5), washed in the blood of Christ, and so made to our God priests, Rev 1:5, Rev 1:6. They also are clothed with the beauty of holiness, and have received the anointing, Jo1 2:27. Their hands are filled with work, to which they must continually attend; and it is through Christ, the great sacrifice, that they are dedicated to this service. His blood sprinkled upon the conscience purges it from dead works, that they may, as priests, serve the living God. The Spirit of God (as Ainsworth notes) is called the finger of God (Luk 11:20, compared with Mat 12:28), and by him the merit of Christ is effectually applied to our souls, as here Moses with his finger was to put the blood upon Aaron. It is likewise intimated that gospel ministers are to be solemnly set apart to the work of the ministry with great deliberation and seriousness both in the ordainers and in the ordained, as those that are to be employed in a great work and entrusted with a great charge.

II. The consecration of the altar, which seems to have been coincident with that of the priests, and the sin-offerings which were offered every day for seven days together had reference to the altar as well as the priests, Exo 29:36, Exo 29:37. An atonement was made for the altar. Though that was not a subject capable of sin, nor, having never yet been used, could it be said to be polluted with the sins of the people, yet, since the fall, there can be no sanctification to God but there must first be an atonement for sin, which renders us both unworthy and unfit to be employed for God. The altar was also sanctified, not only set apart itself to a sacred use, but made so holy as to sanctify the gifts that were offered upon it, Mat 23:19. Christ is our altar; for our sakes he sanctified himself, that we and our performances might be sanctified and recommended to God, Joh 17:19.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–37. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Exodus 29:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.