TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 16:22–31.
We have here, 1. A plain intimation of the observing of a seventh day sabbath, not only before the giving of the law upon Mount Sinai, but before the bringing of Israel out of Egypt, and therefore, from the beginning, Gen 2:3. If the sabbath had now been first instituted, how could Moses have understood what God said to him (Exo 16:5), concerning a double portion to be gathered on the sixth day, without making any express mention of the sabbath? And how could the people so readily take the hint (Exo 16:22), even to the surprise of the rulers, before Moses had declared that it was done with a regard to the sabbath, if they had not had some knowledge of the sabbath before? The setting apart of one day in seven for holy work, and, in order to that, for holy rest, was a divine appointment ever since God created man upon the earth, and the most ancient of positive laws. The way of sabbath-sanctification is the good old way. 2. The double provision which God made for the Israelites, and which they were to make for themselves, on the sixth day: God gave them on the sixth day the bread of two days, Exo 16:29. Appointing them to rest on the seventh day, he took care that they should be no losers by it; and none ever will be losers by serving God. On that day they were to fetch in enough for two days, and to prepare it, Exo 16:23. The law was very strict, that they must bake and seeth, the day before, and not on the sabbath day. This does not now make it unlawful for us to dress meat on the Lord's day, but directs us to contrive our family affairs so that they may hinder us as little as possible in the work of the sabbath. Works of necessity, no doubt, are to be done on that day; but it is desirable to have as little as may be to do of things necessary to the life that now is, that we may apply ourselves the more closely to the one thing needful. That which they kept of for their food on the sabbath day did not putrefy, Exo 16:24. When they kept it in opposition to a command (Exo 16:20) it stank; when they kept it in obedience to a command it was sweet and good; for every thing is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. 3. The intermission of the manna on the seventh day. God did not send it then, and therefore they must not expect it, nor go out to gather, Exo 16:25, Exo 16:26. This showed that it was not produced by natural causes, and that it was designed for a confirmation of the divine authority of the law which was to be given by Moses. Thus God took an effectual course to make them remember the sabbath day; they could not forget it, nor the day of preparation for it. Some, it seems, went out on the seventh day, expecting to find manna (Exo 16:27); but they found none, for those that will find must seek in the appointed time: seek the Lord while he may be found. God, upon this occasion, said to Moses, How long refuse you to keep my commandments? Exo 16:28. Why did he say this to Moses? He was not disobedient. No, but he was the ruler of a disobedient people, and God charges it upon him that he might the more warmly charge it upon them, and might take care that their disobedience should not be through any neglect or default of his. It was for going out to seek for manna on he seventh day that they were thus reproved. Note, (1.) Disobedience, even in a small matter, is very provoking. (2.) God is jealous for the honour of his sabbaths. If walking out on the sabbath to seek for food was thus reproved, walking out on that day purely to find our own pleasure cannot be justified.
Continue studying Exodus 16:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 16:27 recounts a moment of Israelite disobedience in the wilderness, where, despite God's explicit instructions to rest and refrain from gathering manna on the Sabbath, some individuals ventured out on the seventh day only to discover that God had sovereignly withheld His provision. This verse powerfully illustrates the immediate and undeniable consequences of disregarding divine commands, particularly concerning God's miraculous sustenance and the sanctity of the divinely ordained day of rest. It serves as a stark reminder of the futility of human effort when it stands in opposition to divine will and a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness to His own word.
Context
Literary Context
Exodus 16:27 is nestled within the broader narrative of God's miraculous provision of manna and quail to the Israelites in the wilderness, following their urgent complaints about hunger after leaving Egypt (compare Exodus 16:2-3). The preceding verses, particularly Exodus 16:4-5 and Exodus 16:23-26, meticulously detail God's specific instructions regarding the manna: it was to be gathered daily, with a double portion on the sixth day to cover the seventh, the Sabbath, on which no manna would appear. This careful structuring of the manna provision was not merely about sustenance but was explicitly designed by God to test Israel's obedience to His law (as stated in Exodus 16:4). The verse immediately following, Exodus 16:28, records God's direct rebuke of the people for their continued refusal to obey His commandments, highlighting the gravity of their actions in verse 27.
Historical & Cultural Context
The journey through the wilderness presented the newly liberated Israelites with unprecedented challenges, primarily their utter dependence on God for survival. Having been enslaved in Egypt, where they were accustomed to constant labor and a different economic system, the concept of a mandatory day of rest, the Sabbath, was revolutionary. While the formal Ten Commandments, including the Fourth Commandment to "Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy" (Exodus 20:8), would be given later at Mount Sinai, the principles of Sabbath rest and divine provision were already being introduced and tested through the manna. This period was a formative time for Israel, where God was teaching them to trust Him daily, to live by His word, and to understand the rhythm of His kingdom, which included rest as an act of faith, not merely cessation of labor. Their attempt to gather on the Sabbath was a direct challenge to God's authority and a demonstration of their lingering distrust in His ability to provide, mirroring their earlier complaints and longing for Egyptian provisions (compare Numbers 11:4-6).
Key Themes
Exodus 16:27 contributes significantly to several major theological and narrative themes within the book of Exodus and the broader Pentateuch. Central among these is the theme of Divine Provision and Sovereignty, demonstrating God's absolute control over creation and His faithfulness to sustain His people, even in the harshest conditions. Simultaneously, it highlights the theme of Human Obedience and Disobedience, as Israel's actions reveal their struggle to trust God's word fully, even after witnessing His miraculous power. The incident also underscores the nascent theme of the Sabbath as a Test of Faith and a Sign of Covenant, where God establishes a pattern of rest that requires reliance on His past and future provision. This test of obedience (as indicated in Exodus 16:4) foreshadows the comprehensive giving of the Law at Sinai, emphasizing that true relationship with God is characterized by faithful adherence to His commands.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From a primitive root meaning "to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively." Here, it describes the deliberate action of a portion of the people to "go out" from the camp, directly defying God's command to remain in their tents on the Sabbath. This "going out" was an act of presumption, a seeking of provision outside the divine order, and a demonstration of their lack of trust in God's word.
The combination of these terms explicitly identifies the Sabbath, the divinely appointed "day" of rest, the "seventh" in the weekly cycle. The word yôwm refers to a specific period, often a literal day (from sunrise to sunset or one sunset to the next), emphasizing the precise timing of the transgression. This "seventh day" was meant to be a time of cessation from labor, a test of their faith in God's provision, and a foundational element of His covenant. Their action on this specific day was a direct challenge to God's established rhythm and authority.
This primitive root means "to come forth to, i.e. appear or exist; transitively, to attain, i.e. find or acquire." In this context, the people's attempt to "find" manna on the seventh day yielded nothing. The absolute absence of anything to "find" serves as a stark, immediate, and tangible consequence of their disobedience, demonstrating the futility of human effort when it contradicts divine will and the absolute reliability of God's word that no manna would be present.
Verse Breakdown
"And it came to pass, that there went out some of the people"
This opening clause sets the scene, indicating a deliberate action taken by a portion of the Israelite community. The phrase "some of the people" suggests that not everyone was disobedient, but enough were to warrant divine attention and a subsequent rebuke. It highlights a conscious decision by certain individuals to disregard the explicit instructions given by Moses, revealing a spirit of skepticism and a lack of immediate trust.
"on the seventh day for to gather"
This specifies both the timing and the purpose of their outing. The "seventh day" was the Sabbath, the day on which God had declared no manna would fall and no gathering was to occur. Their act of "gathering" on this specific day was a direct defiance of God's command to rest and trust in His double provision from the previous day. It was an act of presumption, born out of a lack of faith in God's faithfulness and a desire to control their own provision.
"and they found none"
This concluding clause reveals the immediate, decisive, and absolute outcome of their disobedience. The absolute absence of manna confirms God's word and demonstrates the futility of human effort when it stands in opposition to divine decree. It served as a clear, tangible consequence, reinforcing the truth that God's provision operates according to His terms, not human will or skepticism, and that His warnings are as reliable as His promises.
Literary Devices
The passage employs several potent literary devices to underscore its message. Contrast is central, juxtaposing God's clear, consistent provision and explicit instructions with the people's persistent disobedience and lack of faith. The divine promise of "none" on the Sabbath is sharply contrasted with the human desire to "gather," leading to the inevitable outcome. There is also a strong element of Narrative Irony: the people go out to gather food, yet the very act of seeking provision outside God's prescribed method leads to finding none. This ironic twist emphasizes the futility of self-reliance when God has already established a perfect system of provision and rest. Finally, the narrative functions as a Didactic Example or Parable of Consequence, where a specific action (disobedience) directly and immediately leads to a predictable and illustrative outcome (no manna), serving as a teaching moment for both the immediate audience and future generations about the importance of trusting and obeying God's word.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Exodus 16:27 profoundly illustrates the critical theological themes of divine sovereignty, human obedience, and the nature of God's testing. God's provision of manna was not merely a logistical solution to hunger but a pedagogical tool designed to cultivate faith and dependence. The Israelites' failure to observe the Sabbath rest, despite clear instructions and tangible evidence of God's faithfulness (the double portion and its preservation), revealed a deep-seated distrust and a propensity to test God rather than obey Him. This incident underscores that true rest and provision are found in alignment with God's will, not through anxious striving or defiance. It also highlights the reliability of God's word: His warnings are as certain as His promises, demonstrating that God's character is consistent and His commands are for the good of His people.
Reflection and Application
Exodus 16:27 serves as a timeless mirror reflecting our own struggles with trust and obedience in the face of God's clear guidance. In a world that often glorifies relentless striving, self-sufficiency, and constant productivity, this passage calls us to embrace the divine rhythm of rest and reliance. It challenges us to consider whether our anxieties about provision, success, or reputation lead us to "gather" outside of God's prescribed ways, whether that means neglecting spiritual rest, compromising ethical principles, or failing to trust Him with our future. The futility of finding "none" reminds us that true abundance and peace are found not in our frantic efforts, but in faithful submission to God's wise and loving commands. Our obedience is not a burden, but an act of worship and a demonstration of our faith in His unfailing faithfulness, recognizing that His ways are always for our ultimate good and His glory. This narrative encourages us to cultivate a posture of patient trust, knowing that God's provision is always sufficient when we walk in His ways.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did God specifically tell them not to gather on the seventh day?
God's command not to gather manna on the seventh day, the Sabbath, was multifaceted and deeply significant. Primarily, it was to establish the principle of the Sabbath as a day of rest and holiness, prefiguring the formal commandment given in Exodus 20:8-11. This was a foundational lesson in trusting God's provision for six days and resting on the seventh, knowing He had already provided abundantly. It was also a test of their obedience and faith, as stated in Exodus 16:4, to see if they would walk in His law. The absence of manna on the Sabbath was a tangible demonstration of God's sovereignty over creation and His commitment to His own ordained patterns, teaching His people to live by faith, not by sight or anxious labor. It was a divine invitation to cease striving and simply depend on Him.
What is the significance of "they found none"?
The phrase "they found none" is highly significant because it underscores the absolute reliability of God's word and the futility of human disobedience. God had explicitly stated that no manna would appear on the seventh day (Exodus 16:26), and His word proved precisely true. This immediate, undeniable consequence served as a powerful, practical lesson to the Israelites that God's commands are not arbitrary suggestions but divine decrees with real outcomes. It demonstrated that attempts to circumvent God's plan or distrust His provision would be met with emptiness, reinforcing the necessity of faith and obedience. It was a direct, divine rebuke in action, confirming that God's economy operates on His terms, and His provision is not subject to human manipulation or presumption.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Exodus 16:27, with its depiction of Israel's failure to trust God's provision and embrace His commanded rest, finds its ultimate fulfillment and resolution in Jesus Christ. While Israel sought physical manna to sustain their earthly lives, Jesus declares Himself to be the "bread of life" (John 6:35), the true manna from heaven who provides eternal sustenance (John 6:48-51). The Sabbath, introduced here as a day of rest and reliance on God's past provision, points forward to the spiritual rest found in Christ. He is not only the Lord of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:8) but also the one who offers true rest for our souls, inviting all who are weary and burdened to find rest in Him (Matthew 11:28-30). The Israelites' anxious striving and finding "none" on the Sabbath contrasts sharply with the abundance of grace and peace available to those who trust in Christ, who has perfectly fulfilled the law and provides all we truly need. Through His finished work on the cross, He frees us from the futile efforts of self-salvation and anxious striving, becoming our ultimate provision, our perfect rest, and the One in whom all God's promises find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20).