Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Who, when they had examined me, would have let me go, because there was no cause of death in me.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Who G3748, when they had examined G350 me G3165, would G1014 have let me go G630, because G1223 there was G5225 no G3367 cause G156 of death G2288 in G1722 me G1698.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They examined me and were ready to release me, because I had done nothing to justify a death sentence.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They examined me and wanted to release me, because there was no basis for a death sentence against me.
Ask
American Standard Version
who, when they had examined me, desired to set me at liberty, because there was no cause of death in me.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
who, when they had examined me, desired to set me free, because there was no cause of death in me.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Who when they had examined me, would haue let me goe, because there was no cause of death in me.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
who, having examined me, were wishing to release me , because of their being no cause of death in me,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Paul's Journey to Rome (Part 2)
Paul's Journey to Rome (Part 2) View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF
Overview of Paul's Journeys
Overview of Paul's Journeys View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,918 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 28:18 captures a pivotal moment in Paul's defense before the Jewish leaders in Rome, where he recounts the consistent findings of Roman authorities in Judea. Despite relentless accusations from his Jewish adversaries, every Roman official who examined Paul—from Felix to Festus and King Agrippa II—found him innocent of any capital crime, confirming that there was no legal basis for a death sentence against him. This verse underscores Paul's vindication within the Roman legal system, highlighting God's providential hand in preserving his life and facilitating his journey to the imperial capital to proclaim the Gospel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Acts 28:18 is part of Paul's final recorded defense in the book of Acts, delivered to the leading Jews in Rome. It immediately follows his explanation of why he appealed to Caesar, clarifying that his presence in Rome was not due to any wrongdoing against his own people or their customs, but rather as a prisoner for the hope of Israel. This verse specifically summarizes the outcome of his multiple trials in Caesarea, serving as a legal precedent that validates his innocence and sets the stage for his continued ministry in Rome under house arrest, as described in the verses that follow Acts 28:30-31. It reinforces the narrative thread throughout the latter half of Acts, where Paul's legal battles consistently demonstrate his adherence to the law and the baselessness of the charges against him.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Paul's trials occurred within the Roman provincial judicial system, which, while often corrupt, generally upheld principles of due process, especially for Roman citizens like Paul. The Jewish leaders in Jerusalem and Caesarea repeatedly brought charges against Paul, primarily related to perceived desecration of the Temple and sedition against Rome, though the latter was a false accusation. Roman governors (Felix and Festus) and King Agrippa II, a client king with Roman authority, conducted thorough examinations. The phrase "cause of death" (Latin: causa mortis) reflects Roman legal terminology for a capital offense. Paul's appeal to Caesar, mentioned earlier in Acts 25:11, was a right afforded to Roman citizens, allowing them to bypass provincial courts and have their case heard by the emperor himself, a strategic move that ultimately brought Paul to Rome, fulfilling a divine prophecy Acts 23:11.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Acts. Firstly, it powerfully reiterates Paul's Proven Innocence, a recurring motif throughout his trials. Despite intense opposition and false accusations, Roman officials consistently found no legitimate grounds for a death sentence, as seen in Festus's declaration in Acts 25:25 and Agrippa's agreement in Acts 26:31. Secondly, it highlights Divine Protection and Providence. Despite years of imprisonment and numerous plots against his life, God sovereignly used the Roman legal system to protect Paul and orchestrate his journey to Rome, fulfilling His purpose for Paul to bear witness to Christ in the imperial capital. Thirdly, the verse subtly points to the Nature of the Accusations. Paul's true "crime" was not civil disobedience or rebellion, but his fervent proclamation of Jesus as the Messiah and the resurrection of the dead, which was deemed heresy by some Jewish factions, demonstrating the profound theological conflict at the heart of the early church's mission.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • examined (Greek, anakrínō', G350): This term (G350) means "to scrutinize, investigate, interrogate, determine." It implies a thorough, judicial inquiry, not a superficial glance. The Roman officials conducted detailed hearings, listening to both Paul's accusers and his defense, cross-examining witnesses, and weighing the evidence. This thoroughness underscores the validity of their findings regarding Paul's innocence.
  • would have let me go (Greek, apolýō', G630): This verb (G630) signifies "to free fully, release, dismiss, set at liberty." It clearly indicates that the Roman authorities, having completed their examination, had reached a verdict of acquittal and intended to release Paul. The only reason for his continued imprisonment and subsequent appeal was the political maneuvering of Festus and the persistent, baseless accusations of the Jewish leaders.
  • cause (Greek, aitía', G156): This noun (G156) refers to a "cause, reason, charge, accusation, crime, fault." In a legal context, it denotes the specific grounds or charges brought against someone. The declaration that there was "no cause" means there was no legitimate, legally justifiable charge that warranted punishment, especially not the death penalty.
  • death (Greek, thánatos', G2288): This word (G2288) refers to "death," specifically in this context, a capital punishment or death sentence. The phrase "no cause of death" (οὐκ αἰτία θανάτου) is a precise legal finding, indicating that Paul had committed no offense for which capital punishment was prescribed under Roman law.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Who, when they had examined me": This clause refers to the various Roman officials—Governor Felix, Governor Festus, and King Agrippa II—who had presided over Paul's trials in Caesarea. The Greek word for "examined" (ἀνακρίνω, anakrínō) implies a thorough judicial investigation, including interrogation and evaluation of evidence. This highlights that Paul's vindication was not a casual dismissal but the result of rigorous legal scrutiny.
  • "would have let [me] go": This indicates the clear intention and conclusion of the Roman authorities. After their examinations, they found no valid legal grounds to hold Paul, let alone condemn him. Their desire was to release him, signifying a verdict of innocence. This emphasizes the baselessness of the accusations brought against him by the Jewish leaders.
  • "because there was no cause of death in me": This is the crucial legal finding. The phrase "cause of death" (αἰτία θανάτου, aitía thanátou) is a technical legal term for a capital offense. The consistent determination by Roman officials that there was "no cause of death" in Paul means he had committed no crime punishable by death. His only "offense" was his preaching of the Gospel, which was not a capital crime under Roman law, though it was vehemently opposed by some Jewish factions.

Literary Devices

The verse primarily employs Legal Language and Understatement. The precise phrase "no cause of death" is a legal declaration, emphasizing the formal, judicial nature of Paul's vindication. This legal precision serves to underscore the baselessness of the accusations against him. The repeated finding of innocence by multiple Roman officials, condensed into this single statement, functions as an Understatement of the intense legal and personal ordeal Paul endured. It also carries an element of Irony: Paul, a prisoner, is repeatedly declared innocent by pagan authorities, while his own countrymen, the Jewish leaders, relentlessly pursue his condemnation based on religious grounds, highlighting the profound spiritual blindness of his accusers. This consistent legal acquittal also serves as a form of Vindication, not just for Paul personally, but for the message he proclaimed, suggesting that the Gospel itself was not a threat to civil order.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 28:18 profoundly illustrates the theme of divine sovereignty working through human legal systems, even those that are imperfect. Paul's repeated acquittal by Roman authorities, despite the persistent and often politically motivated efforts of his accusers, demonstrates God's providential hand in protecting His servant and advancing His kingdom purposes. It shows that even in the face of injustice and false accusations, God can use secular structures to ensure His will is done. This divine oversight not only preserved Paul's life but also facilitated his journey to Rome, the heart of the empire, enabling him to fulfill his mission to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles, even while imprisoned. The consistent finding of "no cause of death" underscores that Paul's "crime" was never against the state, but rather a theological dispute about the identity of the Messiah and the resurrection, which ultimately vindicated the truth of the Christian message as non-threatening to Roman order.

  • Acts 23:11: The Lord stood by Paul and said, "Be of good cheer, Paul: for as thou hast testified of me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome."
  • Acts 25:25: Festus declared, "But when I found that he had committed nothing worthy of death, and that he himself hath appealed to Augustus, I determined to send him."
  • Acts 26:31: They spoke among themselves, saying, "This man doeth nothing worthy of death or of bonds."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Paul's experience in Acts 28:18 offers a powerful testament to perseverance and trust in God's sovereign plan, even amidst prolonged adversity and false accusations. For years, Paul endured imprisonment and legal battles, yet he never wavered in his commitment to the Gospel or his confidence in God's ultimate purpose for his life. His consistent vindication by secular authorities, despite the relentless efforts of his religious adversaries, reminds us that truth can prevail, and God can use unexpected means—even the very systems designed to oppress—to advance His kingdom. This narrative encourages believers today to stand firm in their faith, to speak truth with courage, and to trust that God is at work even when circumstances seem bleak or unjust. It challenges us to examine our own responses to adversity: Do we despair, or do we, like Paul, see opportunities for God's purposes to unfold? Our steadfastness in trials can become a powerful witness to the world, demonstrating the reality of God's faithfulness and the non-threatening nature of the Gospel.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Paul's repeated vindication by Roman authorities encourage you when facing false accusations or misunderstandings in your own life?
  • In what ways might God be using difficult or unjust circumstances in your life to advance His broader purposes, much like He did with Paul's imprisonment?
  • What does Paul's unwavering commitment to sharing the Gospel, even while a prisoner, teach you about priorities in ministry and personal witness?

FAQ

Why did Paul remain imprisoned if he was found innocent by Roman officials?

Answer: Paul's continued imprisonment, despite being found innocent, was largely due to political expediency and his own strategic appeal to Caesar. Governor Festus, wanting to curry favor with the Jewish leaders and perhaps avoid further unrest, was reluctant to simply release Paul. He suggested Paul return to Jerusalem for trial, which Paul knew would be a death trap due to plots against him Acts 25:9-10. As a Roman citizen, Paul had the right to appeal his case directly to the Emperor in Rome Acts 25:11. This appeal, though it kept him in custody, was a deliberate choice by Paul to ensure his safety from his Jewish accusers and, providentially, to fulfill God's plan for him to preach the Gospel in Rome Acts 23:11. Thus, his imprisonment was not a result of guilt, but a complex interplay of political maneuvering, personal safety, and divine purpose.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 28:18, in recounting Paul's vindication by Roman authorities, powerfully foreshadows and reflects the ultimate vindication of Christ Himself. Just as Paul was found to have "no cause of death" in him, yet suffered unjustly, so too was Jesus, the righteous one, declared innocent by Pontius Pilate ("I find no fault in him," John 19:4), yet was condemned to death. Paul's suffering and legal battles, culminating in his journey to Rome, mirror Christ's own path of suffering that led to the cross and ultimately to the triumph of the Gospel. Paul's mission to bear witness to Christ, even in chains, becomes a living embodiment of the Lord's command to be His witnesses "unto the uttermost part of the earth" Acts 1:8. Through Paul's seemingly unjust imprisonment, God's sovereign plan to spread the message of salvation to the Gentile world was fulfilled, demonstrating that the Gospel cannot be chained 2 Timothy 2:9. Paul's life, marked by suffering and vindication, serves as a profound Christ-centered example of how God uses the trials of His servants to advance His redemptive purposes, ultimately pointing to the Lamb of God who was slain, yet rose again, conquering death and offering true freedom to all who believe Revelation 5:9-10.

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 28 verses 17–22

Paul, with a great deal of expense and hazard, is brought a prisoner to Rome, and when he has come nobody appears to prosecute him or lay any thing to his charge; but he must call his own cause; and here he represents it to the chief of the Jews at Rome. It was not long since, by an edict of Claudius, all the Jews were banished from Rome, and kept out till his death; but, in the five years since then, many Jews had come thither, for the advantage of trade, though it does not appear that they were allowed any synagogue there or place of public worship; but these chief of the Jews were those of best figure among them, the most distinguished men of that religion, who had the best estates and interests. Paul called them together, being desirous to stand right in their opinion, and that there might be a good understanding between him and them. And here we are told,

I. What he said to them, and what account he gave them of his cause. He speaks respectfully to them, calls them men and brethren, and thereby intimates that he expects to be treated by them both as a man and as a brother, and engages to treat them as such and to tell them nothing but the truth; for we are members one of another - all we are brethren. Now, 1. He professes his own innocency, and that he had not given any just occasion to the Jews to bear him such an ill will as generally they did: "I have committed nothing against the people of the Jews, have done nothing to the prejudice of their religion or civil liberties, have added no affliction to their present miseries, they know I have not; nor have I committed any thing against the customs of our fathers, either by abrogating or by innovating in religion." It is true Paul did not impose the customs of the fathers upon the Gentiles: they were never intended for them. But it is as true that he never opposed them in the Jews, but did himself, when he was among them, conform to them. He never quarrelled with them for practising according to the usages of their own religion, but only for their enmity to the Gentiles, Gal 2:12. Paul had the testimony of his conscience for him that he had done his duty to the Jews. 2. He modestly complains of the hard usage he had met with - that, though he had given them no offence, yet he was delivered prisoner from Jerusalem into the hands of the Romans. If he had spoken the whole truth in this matter, it would have looked worse than it did upon the Jews, for they would have murdered him without any colour of law or justice if the Romans had not protected him; but, however, they accused him as a criminal, before Felix the governor, and, demanding judgment against him, were, in effect delivering him prisoner into the hands of the Romans, when he desired no more than a fair and impartial trial by their own law. 3. He declares the judgment of the Roman governors concerning him, Act 28:18. They examined him, enquired into his case, heard what was to be said against him, and what he had to say for himself. The chief captain examined him, so did Felix, and Festus, and Agrippa, and they could find no cause of death in him; nothing appeared to the contrary but that he was an honest, quiet, conscientious, good man, and therefore they would never gratify the Jews with a sentence of death upon him; but, on the contrary, would have let him go, and have let him go on in his work too, and have given him no interruption, for they all heard him and liked his doctrine well enough. It was for the honour of Paul that those who most carefully examined his case acquitted him, and none condemned him but unheard, and such as were prejudiced against him. 4. He pleads the necessity he was under to remove himself and his cause to Rome; and that it was only in his own defence, and not with any design to recriminate, or exhibit a cross bill against the complainants, (Act 28:19): When the Jews spoke against it, and entered a caveat against his discharge, designing, if they could not have him condemned to die, yet to have him made a prisoner for life, he was constrained to appeal unto Caesar, finding that the governors, one after another, stood so much in awe of the Jews that they could not discharge him, for fear of making him their enemies, which made it necessary for him to pray the assistance of the higher powers. This was all he aimed at in this appeal; not to accuse his nation, but only to vindicate himself. Every man has a right to plead in his own defence, who yet ought not to find fault with his neighbours. It is an invidious thing to accuse, especially to accuse a nation, such a nation. Paul made intercession for them, but never against them. The Roman government had at this time an ill opinion of the Jewish nation, as factious, turbulent, disaffected, and dangerous; and it had been an easy thing for a man with such a fluent tongue as Paul had, a citizen of Rome, and so injured as he was, to have exasperated the emperor against the Jewish nation. But Paul would not for ever so much do such a thing; he was for making the best of every body, and not making bad worse. 5. He puts his sufferings upon the true footing, and gives them such an account of the reason of them as should engage them not only not to join with his persecutors against him, but to concern themselves for him, and to do what they could on his behalf (Act 28:20): "For this cause I have called for you, not to quarrel with you, for I have no design to incense the government against you, but to see you and speak with you as my countrymen, and men that I would keep up a correspondence with, because for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain." He carried the mark of his imprisonment about with him, and probably was chained to the soldier that kept him; and it was, (1.) Because he preached that the Messiah was come, who was the hope of Israel, he whom Israel hoped for. "Do not all the Jews agree in this, that the Messiah will be the glory of his people Israel? And therefore he is to be hoped for, and this Messiah I preach, and prove he is come. They would keep up such a hope of a Messiah yet to come as must end in a despair of him; I preach such a hope in a Messiah already come as must produce a joy in him." (2.) Because he preached that the resurrection of the dead would come. This also was the hope of Israel; so he had called it, Act 23:6; Act 24:15; Act 26:6, Act 26:7. "They would have you still expect a Messiah that would free you from the Roman yoke, and make you great and prosperous upon earth, and it is this that occupies their thoughts; and they are angry at me for directing their expectations to the great things of another world, and persuading them to embrace a Messiah who will secure those to them, and not external power and grandeur. I am for bringing you to the spiritual and eternal blessedness upon which our fathers by faith had their eye, and this is what they hate me for, - because I would take you off from that which is the cheat of Israel, and will be its shame and ruin, the notion of a temporal Messiah, and lead you to that which is the true and real hope of Israel, and the genuine sense of all the promises made to the fathers, a spiritual kingdom of holiness and love set up in the hearts of men, to be the pledge of, and preparative for, the joyful resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come."

II. What was their reply. They own, 1. That they had nothing to say in particular against him; nor had any instructions to appear as his prosecutors before the emperor, either by letter or word of mouth (Act 28:21): "We have neither received letters out of Judea concerning thee (have no orders to prosecute thee) nor have any of the brethren of the Jewish nation that have lately come up to Rome (as many occasions drew the Jews thither now that their nation was a province of that empire) shown or spoken any harm of thee." This was very strange, that that restless and inveterate rage of the Jews which had followed Paul wherever he went should not follow him to Rome, to get him condemned there. Some think they told a lie here, and had orders to prosecute him, but durst not own it, being themselves obnoxious to the emperor's displeasure, who though he had not, like his predecessors, banished them all from Rome, yet gave them no countenance there. But I am apt to think that what they said was true, and Paul now found he had gained the point he aimed at in appealing to Caesar, which was to remove his cause into a court to which they durst not follow it. This was David's policy, and it was his security (Sa1 27:1): There is nothing better for me than to escape into the land of the Philistines, and Saul shall despair of me, to seek me any more in any coasts of Israel; so shall I escape out of his hands: and it proved so, Act 28:4. When Saul heard that David had fled to Gath, he sought no more again for him. Thus did Paul by his appeal: he fled to Rome, where he was out of their reach; and they said, "Even let him go." 2. That they desired to know particularly concerning the doctrine he preached, and the religion he took so much pains to propagate in the face of so much opposition (Act 28:22): "We desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest - ha phroneis what thy opinions or sentiments are, what are those things which thou art so wise about, and hast such a relish of and such a zeal for; for, though we know little else of Christianity, we know it is a sect every where spoken against." Those who said this scornful spiteful word of the Christian religion were Jews, the chief of the Jews at Rome, who boasted of their knowledge (Rom 2:17), and yet this was all they knew concerning the Christian religion, that it was a sect every where spoken against. They put it into an ill name, and then ran it down. (1.) They looked upon it to be a sect, and this was false. True Christianity establishes that which is of common concern to all mankind, and is not built upon such narrow opinions and private interests as sects commonly owe their original to. It aims at no worldly benefit or advantage as sects do; but all its gains are spiritual and eternal. And, besides, it has a direct tendency to the uniting of the children of men, and not the dividing of them, and setting them at variance, as sects have. (2.) They said it was every where spoken against, and this was too true. All that they conversed with spoke against it, and therefore they concluded every body did: most indeed did. It is, and always has been, the lot of Christ's holy religion to be every where spoken against.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 17–22. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 55
"Who having examined me," says he, "found nothing in me." When those ought to have rescued, they "delivered him into the hands of the Romans." And such the superabundance, because those had not power to condemn but delivered him prisoner. "Not as having aught to accuse my nation of," am I come. See what friendliness of expression "my nation:" he does not hold them as aliens. He does not say, I do not accuse, but, "I have not whereof to accuse:" although he had suffered so many evils at their hands. But nothing of all this does he say, nor make his speech offensive: neither does he seem to be sparing them as matter of favor. For this was the main point, to show that they delivered him prisoner to the Romans, when those ought to have condemned him. "For this cause," he says, "I wished to see you:" that it might not be in any man's power to accuse me, and to say what naturally might suggest itself, that having escaped their hands I have come for this: not to bring evils upon others, but myself fleeing from evils. "I was compelled to appeal unto Caesar."
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 55
"How then is it reasonable," it might be said, "that they should deliver thee up without a cause?" The Roman governors, he says, bear me witness, who wished to let me go. "How was it then that they did not let thee go?" "When the Jews spake against it," he says. Observe how he extenuates in speaking of their charges against him. Since if he had wished to aggravate matters, he might have used them so as to bear harder upon them.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 55
He wished to exculpate both himself and others; himself, that they might not accuse him, and by so doing hurt themselves; and those others, that it might not seem that the whole thing was of their doing. For it was likely that a report was prevalent, that he had been delivered up by the Jews; and this was enough to alarm them. He therefore addresses himself to this, and defends himself as to his own conduct.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 28:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.