Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Hushai said unto Absalom, Nay; but whom the LORD, and this people, and all the men of Israel, choose, his will I be, and with him will I abide.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Hushai H2365 said H559 unto Absalom H53, Nay; but whom the LORD H3068, and this people H5971, and all the men H376 of Israel H3478, choose H977, his will I be, and with him will I abide H3427.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Hushai replied, "No, but whomever ADONAI and this people and all the men of Isra'el choose, his I will be; and with him I will stay.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“Not at all,” Hushai answered. “For the one chosen by the LORD, by the people, and by all the men of Israel—his I will be, and with him I will remain.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Hushai said unto Absalom, Nay; but whom Jehovah, and this people, and all the men of Israel have chosen, his will I be, and with him will I abide.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Hushai said to Absalom, “No; but whomever the LORD, and this people, and all the men of Israel have chosen, his will I be, and with him I will stay.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Hushai then answered vnto Absalom, Nay, but whome the Lord, and this people, and all the men of Israel chuse, his will I be, and with him will I dwell.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Hushai saith unto Absalom, `Nay, for he whom Jehovah hath chosen, and this people, even all the men of Israel, his I am, and with him I abide;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
Absalom Seizes Jerusalem
Absalom Seizes Jerusalem View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,445 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

2 Samuel 16:18 captures a pivotal moment of strategic deception by Hushai the Archite, who, acting as King David's secret agent, feigns unwavering loyalty to Absalom during his rebellion. In this masterstroke of political cunning, Hushai declares his allegiance to "whom the LORD, and this people, and all the men of Israel, choose," subtly aligning his words with Absalom's perceived popular legitimacy while secretly intending to undermine the usurper's plans and secure the restoration of David, God's true anointed king. This carefully crafted statement was instrumental in setting the stage for the frustration of Ahithophel's astute counsel and the eventual collapse of Absalom's revolt.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed at a critical juncture in the unfolding drama of Absalom's rebellion, immediately following King David's hurried flight from Jerusalem as recounted in 2 Samuel 15:14. David, despite his distress, demonstrates remarkable foresight and strategic acumen. He had specifically instructed his loyal and shrewd counselor, Hushai, to return to Jerusalem with a crucial mission: to infiltrate Absalom's inner circle and, most importantly, to counteract the dangerous and highly influential advice of Ahithophel, who had shockingly defected from David's side to join Absalom (2 Samuel 15:31 and 2 Samuel 15:34). Upon Hushai's arrival, Absalom questions his presence, given Hushai's long-standing and well-known loyalty to David. Hushai's reply in 2 Samuel 16:18 is a meticulously crafted response, designed to immediately gain Absalom's trust and position himself to execute David's counter-strategy, thereby saving the kingdom.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The concept of kingship in ancient Israel was inherently complex, often involving a delicate balance between divine election and popular acclamation. While kings like Saul and David were anointed by God's prophet, signifying divine choice, their rule also required the acceptance and support of the people to be fully established and maintained. Absalom's rebellion, meticulously detailed in 2 Samuel 15, masterfully capitalized on existing popular discontent and Absalom's charismatic appeal, effectively "stealing the hearts of the men of Israel" (2 Samuel 15:6). In such a volatile political climate, a counselor's loyalty was paramount, and defection was universally seen as a grave act of treachery. Hushai's statement, "whom the LORD, and this people, and all the men of Israel, choose," cleverly taps into this dual understanding of legitimate rule. He frames his loyalty in terms that Absalom, who had successfully garnered popular support, would find appealing and validating, while subtly referencing the divine element that Absalom himself claimed (e.g., through his pretense of fulfilling a vow to the LORD in Hebron, 2 Samuel 15:7-9). This nuanced approach allowed Hushai to appear fully committed to Absalom's cause without betraying his true allegiance to David.
  • Key Themes: 2 Samuel 16:18 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of 2 Samuel. Firstly, it highlights strategic deception as a complex tool in political and military maneuvering. Hushai's calculated act of feigned loyalty is not for personal gain but for the preservation of David's legitimate kingship and, by extension, God's anointed order. Secondly, the narrative underscores the profound interplay between divine sovereignty and human agency. While Hushai employs human cunning and political astuteness, the broader unfolding of events reveals that God is actively orchestrating circumstances to fulfill His purposes, ultimately frustrating the counsel of Ahithophel and securing David's return (2 Samuel 17:14). This demonstrates that even in the midst of human treachery and intricate schemes, God remains sovereign, guiding events towards His intended outcome. Finally, the verse speaks to the legitimacy of kingship, subtly reaffirming that true rule in Israel involved both divine election and popular consent, a standard Absalom sought to usurp but ultimately failed to secure in God's eyes.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Choose (Hebrew, bâchar, H977): This verb (H977) signifies selection, election, or preference. In the context of Israelite monarchy, it carries profound theological weight, as kings were understood to be "chosen" by God (e.g., 1 Samuel 16:12 regarding David). Hushai's use of "whom the LORD... choose" is a brilliant rhetorical move. It allows him to appear principled and aligned with divine will, while simultaneously acknowledging Absalom's perceived popular legitimacy. For Absalom, it validates his ascent; for Hushai, it is a veiled reference to God's true choice, David, whose kingship was divinely established.
  • Abide (Hebrew, yâshab, H3427): Derived from the primitive root (H3427) meaning "to sit down, dwell, remain, inhabit." In this context, "abide" conveys a sense of enduring loyalty, steadfast presence, and commitment to serve. The form used in the verse, "will I abide" (אֶשְׁכֹּן, 'eshkon'), emphasizes a future, continuous presence. Hushai's declaration "with him will I abide" promises a lasting allegiance, which is precisely what Absalom needs from a seasoned and respected counselor like Hushai. The profound irony lies in the fact that Hushai intends to "abide" only long enough to strategically dismantle Absalom's plans and ensure David's return.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Hushai said unto Absalom, Nay;": This initial word, "Nay," is crucial for Hushai's deception. It serves as a direct, unequivocal refutation of Absalom's implicit accusation or question about Hushai's continued loyalty to David. This sharp rejection of his previous allegiance is designed to immediately disarm Absalom's suspicion and open the door for Hushai's feigned commitment to the usurper. It establishes a false premise of a clean break from David.
  • "but whom the LORD, and this people, and all the men of Israel, choose,": This clause is the heart of Hushai's deceptive brilliance and rhetorical mastery. By invoking "the LORD," he appeals to divine authority, which Absalom himself would claim to possess or desire as a legitimation for his rebellion. By adding "this people, and all the men of Israel," he shrewdly acknowledges the popular acclamation that Absalom had successfully garnered (2 Samuel 15:6). This tripartite declaration of choice—divine, popular, and national—is a powerful statement of legitimacy that Absalom, in his ambition, would find irresistible and validating for his own usurpation.
  • "his will I be, and with him will I abide.": This is Hushai's declaration of allegiance and commitment. The phrase "his will I be" signifies complete submission and dedication to the chosen leader, while "with him will I abide" promises continued presence, support, and steadfast counsel. To Absalom, these words signify loyalty to himself and his cause; to the discerning reader, knowing Hushai's true mission from David, they are a profound example of strategic ambiguity and double meaning, highlighting Hushai's dangerous but loyal mission.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 2 Samuel 16:18 is Irony, specifically Dramatic Irony. The audience is fully aware of Hushai's true intentions and his secret mission from David (2 Samuel 15:32-37), while Absalom remains completely oblivious, taking Hushai's words at face value. This creates a palpable tension between what is spoken and what is truly meant, underscoring Hushai's profound cunning and the precariousness of Absalom's position. Closely related is Double Entendre or Ambiguity, as Hushai's words are meticulously chosen to carry one meaning for Absalom (unwavering loyalty to him) and another, deeper, and ironic meaning for the informed reader (unwavering loyalty to the divinely chosen king, David). The phrase "whom the LORD... choose" is particularly rich in this ambiguity, as God's true choice was David, not Absalom. Furthermore, the passage employs Characterization, vividly portraying Hushai as a shrewd, loyal, and resourceful individual, willing to undertake a dangerous and ethically complex mission for his king and for the preservation of God's established order. This strategic deception also serves as Foreshadowing, hinting at the eventual frustration of Absalom's plans and the ultimate triumph of David, orchestrated by divine providence.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Hushai's deceptive loyalty in 2 Samuel 16:18 serves as a powerful illustration of God's sovereign hand at work, even in the midst of human chaos, rebellion, and intricate political maneuvering. While Hushai's actions involve a calculated deception, the broader biblical narrative consistently demonstrates that God can use unexpected means and even morally ambiguous human choices to achieve His righteous purposes. This episode underscores the profound theme that "the counsel of the LORD stands forever, the plans of his heart to all generations" (Psalm 33:11). It reveals that God's ultimate plan for His anointed king, David, would prevail despite the formidable threat posed by Absalom and his astute counselor, Ahithophel. The narrative implicitly teaches that true legitimacy in leadership ultimately derives from God's appointment and blessing, not merely from popular acclaim or human cunning. God's wisdom is ultimately superior to all human schemes, and He orchestrates events to fulfill His divine will.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Hushai's story in 2 Samuel 16:18 offers a complex tapestry for profound reflection and practical application. While his deception presents an ethical challenge, the narrative invites us to consider the broader context of divine sovereignty and God's active involvement in human affairs. In times of great turmoil, when legitimate authority is challenged, chaos seems to reign, and the future appears uncertain, this verse powerfully reminds us that God is actively working behind the scenes. He often uses unexpected and even humanly flawed means to bring about His perfect purposes, demonstrating His ability to turn the tables on seemingly insurmountable odds. This narrative challenges us to cultivate a deep trust in God's overarching plan, even when circumstances seem overwhelmingly against us or when human schemes appear to prevail. It also prompts us to discern true leadership—leadership that is ultimately aligned with God's will and the welfare of His people, rather than merely popular appeal, charismatic personality, or self-interest. While we are unequivocally called to truthfulness and integrity in our daily lives, this unique historical moment, divinely orchestrated, highlights God's profound ability to use all things, including the "wisdom of the world" that is foolishness to Him, to accomplish His divine and righteous will.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Hushai's strategic deception, within its specific biblical context, challenge or affirm your understanding of ethical behavior and God's sovereignty?
  • In what ways can we, as believers, discern and trust God's sovereign hand at work in difficult or chaotic situations in our own lives, our communities, or the world today?
  • What does this narrative teach us about the nature of true, legitimate leadership, especially in contrast to leadership driven solely by ambition, popular opinion, or personal gain?
  • How might we, like Hushai, be called to act wisely, strategically, and courageously for God's kingdom, even when the path is not straightforward or requires difficult choices?

FAQ

Was Hushai's deception morally justifiable from a biblical perspective?

Answer: The Bible often presents narratives without explicitly endorsing every action within them, allowing the reader to observe God's overarching plan and character. While deception is generally condemned in Scripture (e.g., Proverbs 12:22), Hushai's case is a complex and unique one. His deception was not for personal gain, malicious intent, or to harm the innocent, but was a strategic act of loyalty to God's anointed king, David, and implicitly, to God's established order and the welfare of Israel. The narrative strongly implies divine approval and orchestration, as the Lord Himself "frustrated the good counsel of Ahithophel, to the intent that the LORD might bring evil upon Absalom" (2 Samuel 17:14). This suggests that God, in His sovereignty, can use even human actions that might otherwise be questionable to achieve His righteous and redemptive purposes, particularly in the context of preserving His chosen lineage and preventing civil war's full devastation. It is a specific instance where a "lesser evil" (deception) serves a greater good (preserving the divinely appointed king and the stability of the nation), demonstrating God's ability to work through imperfect human agents and complex circumstances.

How did Hushai's counsel ultimately help David and lead to Absalom's downfall?

Answer: Hushai's deceptive counsel was absolutely instrumental in David's survival and Absalom's ultimate defeat. After successfully gaining Absalom's trust through his feigned loyalty, Hushai skillfully countered Ahithophel's initial, strategically sound advice to immediately pursue David with a swift, decisive strike (2 Samuel 17:1-3). Ahithophel's plan would likely have crushed David before he could regroup. Hushai, instead, proposed a more elaborate, time-consuming plan involving gathering a massive army from all Israel, with Absalom leading it personally (2 Samuel 17:7-13). Crucially, Absalom and the elders of Israel preferred Hushai's counsel, because "the LORD had ordained to defeat the good counsel of Ahithophel, to the intent that the LORD might bring evil upon Absalom" (2 Samuel 17:14). This critical delay allowed David precious time to cross the Jordan River, regroup his loyal forces, and prepare for battle, ultimately leading to Absalom's decisive defeat and death in the forest of Ephraim (2 Samuel 18:6-15). Ahithophel, recognizing the fatal error and the divine hand against his counsel, went home and hanged himself in despair (2 Samuel 17:23), confirming the success of Hushai's mission.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hushai's cunning loyalty to David, the anointed king, serves as a remarkable foreshadowing of the ultimate divine wisdom at work in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Just as Hushai strategically positioned himself within the enemy's camp, appearing to serve Absalom while secretly working for David's restoration, so too did God's grand plan for salvation involve a seemingly paradoxical path. The wisdom of God, supremely manifested in Christ's humble incarnation, suffering, and sacrificial death on the cross, appeared as utter foolishness to the world and its rulers (1 Corinthians 1:18-25). Yet, through this very "foolishness," God utterly defeated the true cosmic enemy, Satan, and secured the eternal reign of His Son. Jesus is the ultimate "chosen" one, not merely by popular acclamation or human election, but by divine decree and eternal purpose (John 1:34, John 6:69). Our loyalty, like Hushai's, is ultimately due to this true and eternal King, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, whose kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), yet will ultimately prevail over all earthly rebellions, schemes, and opposition (Revelation 11:15). In Christ, God's perfect wisdom and unwavering sovereignty are fully revealed, ensuring the triumph of His eternal kingdom over all that stands against Him.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 16 verses 15–23

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Absalom had notice sent him speedily by some of his friends at Jerusalem that David had withdrawn, and with what a small retinue he had gone; so that the coasts were clear, Absalom might take possession of Jerusalem when he pleased. The gates were open, and there was none to oppose him. Accordingly he came without delay (Sa2 16:15), extremely elevated, no doubt, with this success at first, and that that in which, when he formed his design, he probably apprehended the greatest difficulty, was so easily and effectually done. Now that he is master of Jerusalem he concludes all his own, the country will follow of course. God suffers wicked men to prosper awhile in their wicked plots, even beyond their expectation, that their disappointment may be the more grievous and disgraceful. The most celebrated politicians of that age were Ahithophel and Hushai. The former Absalom brings with him to Jerusalem (Sa2 16:15), the other meets him there (Sa2 16:16), so that he cannot but think himself sure of success, when he has both these to be his counsellors; on them he relies, and consults not the ark, though he has that with him. But miserable counsellors were they both; for,

I. Hushai would never counsel him to do wisely. He was really his enemy, and designed to betray him, while he pretended to be in his interest; so that Absalom could not have a more dangerous man about him. 1. Hushai complimented him upon his accession to the throne, as if he had been abundantly satisfied in this title, and well pleased that he had come to the possession, Sa2 16:16. What arts of dissimulation are those tempted to use who govern themselves by fleshly wisdom! and how happy are those who have not known these depths of Satan, but have their conversation in the world with simplicity and godly sincerity! 2. Absalom was surprised to find him for him who was known to be David's intimate friend and confidant. He asks him, Is this thy kindness to thy friend? (Sa2 16:17), pleasing himself with this thought, that all would be his, since Hushai was. He doubts not of his sincerity, but easily believes what he wishes to be true, that David's best friends are so in love with himself as to take the first opportunity to declare for him, though the pride of his heart deceived him, Oba 1:3. Hushai confirmed him in the belief that he was hearty for him. For, though David is his friend, yet he is for the king in possession, Sa2 16:18. Whom the people choose, and Providence smiles upon, he will be faithful to; and he is for the king in succession (Sa2 16:19), the rising sun. It was true, he loved his father; but he had had his day, and it was over; and why should he not love his successor as well? Thus he pretended to give reasons for a resolution he abhorred the thought of.

II. Ahithophel counselled him to do wickedly, and so did as effectually betray him as he did who was designedly false to him; for those that advise men to sin certainly advise them to their hurt; and that government which is founded in sin is founded in the sand.

1.It seems, Ahithophel was noted as a deep politician; his counsel was as if a man had enquired at the oracle of God, Sa2 16:23. Such reputation was he in for subtlety and sagacity in public affairs, such reaches had he beyond other privy-counselors, such reasons would he give for his advice, and such success generally his projects had, that all people, good and bad, both David and Absalom, had a profound regard for his sentiments, too much by far, when they regarded him as an oracle of God; shall the prudence of any mortal compare with him who only is wise? Let us observe from this account of Ahithophel's fame for policy, (1.) That many excel in worldly wisdom who are utterly destitute of heavenly grace, because those who set up for oracles themselves are apt to despise the oracles of God. God has chosen the foolish things of the world; and the greatest statesmen are seldom the greatest saints. (2.) That frequently the greatest politicians act most foolishly for themselves. Ahithophel was cried up for an oracle, and yet very unwisely took part with Absalom, who was not only a usurper, but a rash youth, never likely to come to good, whose fall, and the fall of all that adhered to him, any one, with the tenth part of the policy that Ahithophel pretended to, might foresee. Well, after all, honesty is the best policy, and will be found so in the long run. But,

2.His policy in this case defeated its own aim. Observe,

(1.)The wicked counsel Ahithophel gave to Absalom. Finding that David had left his concubines to keep the house, he advised him to lie with them (Sa2 16:21), a very wicked thing. The divine law had made it a capital crime, Lev 20:11. The apostle speaks of it as a piece of villany not so much as named among the Gentiles, Co1 5:1. Reuben lost his birthright for it. But Ahithophel advised Absalom to it as a public thing, because it would give assurance to all Israel, [1.] That he was in good earnest in his pretensions. No doubt he resolved to make himself master of all that belonged to his predecessor when he began with his concubines. [2.] That he was resolved never to make peace with his father upon any terms; for by this he would render himself so odious to his father that he would never be reconciled to him, which perhaps the people were jealous of and that they must be sacrificed to the reconciliation. Having drawn the sword, he did, by this provocation, throw away the scabbard, which would strengthen the hands of his party and keep them firmly to him. This was Ahithophel's cursed policy, which bespoke him rather an oracle of devil than of God.

(2.)Absalom's compliance with this counsel. It entirely suited his lewd and wicked mind, and he delayed not to put it in execution, Sa2 16:22. When an unnatural rebellion was the opera, what fitter prologue could there be to it than such unnatural lust? Thus was his wickedness all of a piece, and such as a conscience not quite seared could not entertain the thoughts of without the utmost horror. Nay, the client outdoes what his counsel advises. Ahithophel advised him to do it, that all Israel shall see it. A tent is accordingly spread on the top of the house for the purpose; so impudently does he declare his sin as Sodom. Yet, in this, the word of God was fulfilled in the letter of it: God had threatened, by Nathan, that, for defiling Bath-sheba, David should have his own wives publicly debauched (Sa2 12:11, Sa2 12:12), and some think that Ahithophel, in advising it, designed to be revenged on David for the injury done to Bath-sheba, who was his grand-daughter: for she was the daughter of Eliam (Sa2 11:3), who was the son of Ahithophel, Sa2 23:34. Job speaks of this as the just punishment of adultery (Let my wife grind to another, Job 31:9, Job 31:10), and the prophet, Hos 4:13, Hos 4:14. What to think of these concubines, who submitted to this wickedness, I know not; but how unrighteous soever Absalom and they were, we must say, The Lord is righteous: nor shall any word of his fall to the ground.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 16:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.