Skip to content

2 Peter 1:21

“The Surety of Apostolic Testimony”2 Peter 1:16–21
King James Version
For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 the prophecy G4394 came G5342 not G3756 in old time G4218 by the will G2307 of man G444: but G235 holy G40 men G444 of God G2316 spake G2980 as they were moved G5342 by G5259 the Holy G40 Ghost G4151.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
For no such prophecy was ever brought forth by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
For no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Spirit.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
For no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke, being moved by the Holy Spirit.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
For the prophecie came not in olde time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
for not by will of man did ever prophecy come, but by the Holy Spirit borne on holy men of God spake.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
17 Greek words
  1. οὐouNotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  2. γὰρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
  3. θελήματιthelēmatiby [the] willG2307N-DSNNoun Dative Singular Neuter
  4. ἀνθρώπουanthrōpouof manG444N-GSMNoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  5. ἠνέχθηēnechthēwas broughtG5342V-API-3SVerb Aorist Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
  6. προφητείαprophēteiaprophecyG4394N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  7. ποτέpoteat any timeG4218PRTParticle or Disjunctive
  8. ἀλλ᾽all᾽butG235CONJConjunction
  9. ὑπὸhupobyG5259PREPPreposition
  10. πνεύματοςpneumatos[the] SpiritG4151N-GSNNoun Genitive Singular Neuter
  11. ἁγίουhagiouHolyG40A-GSNAdjective Genitive Singular Neuter
  12. φερόμενοιpheromenoibeing carriedG5342V-PPP-NPMVerb Present Passive Participle Nominative Plural Masculine
  13. ἐλάλησανelalēsanspokeG2980V-AAI-3PVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  14. οἱhoi[the]G3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  15. ἀπὸapofromG575PREPPreposition
  16. θεοῦtheouof GodG2316N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
  17. ἄνθρωποιanthrōpoimenG444N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation differences
Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 30,501 of 31,102 · 98.1%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Prophecy came from God and not by the will of man, for holy men of God spoke as the Holy Ghost carried them along, so what they spoke is God’s own word.

“For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man:”

“In old time” looks back over the whole era of the Old Testament prophets. Their message began with God’s decision.

“but holy men of God spake”

Consecrated men, belonging to God, who really spoke with their own voices.

“as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.”

Carried along by the Spirit, so that the message they gave was God’s own and exactly what he intended.

Eyewitnesses of His Majesty and the Sure Word

2 Peter 1:16–21

Summary

Peter, writing near the end of his life, tells the church that the message of Christ’s power and coming rests on things he saw and heard. On the holy mount he, James and John saw the majesty of Jesus and heard the Father’s voice say, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” Then Peter points to something firmer still, the word of the prophets, which shines like a lamp in a dark place until the day dawns and the day star rises in our hearts. That word is sure because of where it came from: holy men of God spoke as the Holy Ghost carried them along. In six verses God gives us two witnesses to his Son, the apostles who saw him and the Scriptures his Spirit gave, and both hold firm.

What the apostles made known, and how they knew it

These verses come near the end of Peter’s life, which he knows is close (2 Peter 1:14). Earlier in 2 Peter 1 he has reminded the church that God’s divine power has given us all things that pertain to life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3), and he has urged them to grow, so that they will be fruitful “in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 1:8). Now he turns to the source of that knowledge and shows why it can be trusted. He sets two witnesses side by side, what the apostles saw and heard of Christ and the word of the prophets, and the church needed both, because false teachers were at work who denied the Lord, lived immorally and scoffed at the promise of his return (2 Peter 2:1–3).

Peter begins with what the apostles’ preaching stands apart from: “cunningly devised fables”. The word for fables, mŷthos, means a made-up story or legend, fiction told to entertain or to deceive. “Cunningly devised” translates sophízō, a verb for something cleverly put together, even with a wish to manipulate, and the phrase describes stories built by human skill. The Gentile world around the churches had many such stories: myths about the gods, the tales of the mystery religions and the speculations of the philosophers. Peter puts the gospel in another class altogether. The apostles preached what they had seen.

What they made known was “the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ”. His power, dýnamis, is his divine authority and the might he showed in his miracles, beginning with the first sign at Cana (John 2:11). His coming is his parousía, a word that means a being near, a presence or an arrival. In the New Testament it often names the Lord’s return (1 Thessalonians 4:16), the day when every eye shall see him (Revelation 1:7). So the apostles preached a Christ who has power now and who will surely come again.

Against invented stories Peter sets this: “but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.” An eyewitness, epóptēs, is a looker-on, someone who has seen a thing with his own eyes. What they saw was his megaleiótēs, his majesty, greatness and splendour. In Peter’s day, as in ours, the word of a person who had seen a thing for himself carried weight in law and in daily life, and the apostles’ preaching rests on that footing. John opens his first letter on the same ground, with what the apostles had seen and heard of the Word of life (1 John 1:1–3), and his Gospel speaks of the Word made flesh, whose glory they beheld (John 1:14).

The majesty Peter means is what he saw at the Transfiguration, which the Gospels tell in Matthew 17:1–8, Mark 9:2–8 and Luke 9:28–36. There Peter, James and John saw Jesus transfigured before them and shining with divine glory. It was a glimpse of the glory he had with the Father before the world began (John 17:5), and a foretaste of the glory he will show when he comes again “with power and great glory” (Matthew 24:30). That is why Peter speaks of the mountain when he speaks of the Lord’s coming. The three men had already seen, for a little while, the majesty in which he will return.

What were the “cunningly devised fables”?

The fables are invented stories about the divine, and Peter leaves them unnamed so that his word covers all of them. In his world that meant the myths of the gods told among the Gentiles, the stories of the mystery religions and the philosophical schools, and readings that turned real events into allegory and drained them of their truth. Against all of these the apostles set Jesus himself, a real man who walked among us, worked miracles, died for our sins and rose again. The fables were made by human cleverness, and the gospel is the record of what God did in his Son.

The Father’s voice from the excellent glory

“For he received from God the Father honour and glory.” On the mountain the Son received honour and glory from his Father. His appearance was changed and his majesty shone out, and this was his own glory as the Son, shown openly and confirmed by the Father himself. The word for glory, dóxa, means visible splendour, honour and renown, and it is often used of God’s presence made visible. To Jewish hearers it would recall the Shekinah glory of God’s presence, and to Greek ones the splendour of the divine.

The voice came “from the excellent glory”. Megaloprepḗs means magnificent, majestic, befitting greatness, and “the excellent glory” is Peter’s reverent way of naming the presence of God the Father in his overwhelming splendour. The voice came out of that presence, and it spoke aloud.

The Father said, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” These are the words heard at Jesus’ baptism (Matthew 3:17), and all three Gospels record the voice on the mountain (Matthew 17:5, Mark 9:7, Luke 9:35). “My beloved Son” declares the bond of the Son with the Father, which belongs to him alone, and confirms that Jesus is the Messiah. “Well pleased” is eudokéō, to approve, to take delight in, to be satisfied with. The Father approves his Son’s person, his mission and his obedience, the obedience that would take him to the cross.

The mountain looked ahead to greater glory. The Son who was honoured there was “declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead” (Romans 1:4), and he now lives at the Father’s right hand, where he ever makes intercession for his people (Hebrews 7:25). The Father’s delight in his Son reaches those who belong to him. Through Christ we are made partakers of the divine nature (2 Peter 1:4) and heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17), and in him all the promises of God are yea and amen (2 Corinthians 1:20).

What Peter heard on the holy mount

“And this voice which came from heaven we heard.” Peter’s word for voice, phōnē, means a clear sound or a spoken address, and “heard” is akoúō, the common verb for hearing. He stresses that the voice reached their ears from outside them, as a real sound. Peter, James and John all heard it, so the witness belongs to all three men Jesus took up with him. “From heaven” names its source, God himself, and gives it his authority.

“When we were with him in the holy mount.” “With him” places them beside Jesus, close enough to see and hear everything. The Gospels speak of a high mountain, and tradition names Mount Tabor or Mount Hermon. Peter calls it holy, joining hágios, sacred or set apart, to óros, a mountain. The mountain was holy because God showed his presence there and revealed the glory of his Son, as he had shown himself to Moses on Mount Sinai.

Jewish teachers spoke of a voice from heaven, which they called a bat kol, as one way God spoke after prophecy had ceased. The voice Peter heard was God the Father speaking of his Son, who is the brightness of God’s glory (Hebrews 1:3) and who will return as King of kings and Lord of lords (Revelation 19:16). The glory that was veiled during his earthly ministry was shown for a short time to three of his closest disciples.

Why the word of prophecy is “more sure”

“We have also a more sure word of prophecy.” The word bébaios means stable, firm, steadfast, sure, and Peter uses it in the comparative form, bebaioteron, “more sure” or “firmer”. The word of prophecy is chiefly the Old Testament Scriptures, which foretold the coming of Christ and the unfolding of God’s plan to save.

This is a striking thing for Peter to say. He has just told of the greatest moment of his life, when he saw Christ’s glory and heard the Father’s voice, and he calls the prophetic word firmer still. He stands by every word he has said about the mountain, which was real and was heard aloud. Yet three men saw it, on one day. The prophetic word was spoken over centuries, written down for all God’s people and fulfilled in Christ, so every believer can open it and test any teaching by it. Peter is about to warn against teachers with claims of their own, and he grounds the church on a word that stands outside any one person’s experience.

He tells the church that they “do well” to take heed to it, to pay it close and steady attention. This is the wise course, and in a time of false teaching it is how believers keep their footing and tell truth from error.

A light that shineth in a dark place

Peter compares the prophetic word to a lamp shining in a dark place. The place he pictures is dim and murky, even dirty, and it stands for this world in its ignorance of God, its moral corruption and the confusion that false teaching brings. In such a place the lamp is the one sure guide, and a psalm calls God’s word a lamp in the same way (Psalm 119:105). The lamp is needed for a time, “until the day dawn”.

Who is the day star?

The day star is Christ. Peter’s word, phōsphóros, means light-bearing or light-bringer, and it names the morning star, the planet Venus, which appears in the eastern sky just before sunrise and announces the coming day. Jesus calls himself “the bright and morning star” (Revelation 22:16). John speaks of him as the Word in whom was life and light, shining in the darkness (John 1:1–5), and as the true Light that comes into the world (John 1:9).

The dawning of the day most likely means the return of Christ and the full coming of his kingdom, when every shadow will flee. Yet Peter says the day star arises “in your hearts”. The heart, kardía, is the inner person, the seat of thought, feeling and will. So the verse holds two things together. Believers wait for the morning of Christ’s return, and meanwhile the Holy Spirit makes Christ’s light rise ever more fully within them, as they come to know his truth and his presence more deeply. Paul calls this “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27).

Where prophecy came from

“Knowing this first.” Prōton means first in order or importance, and Peter puts this truth at the head of all he says about the prophetic word, because the trust he has just asked for rests on it.

The truth is that “no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.” Prophēteía, prophecy, covers prediction and also the whole message God gave through his spokesmen, both foretelling what was to come and telling forth his truth. Graphḗ means a writing, and in the Bible it names holy Writ. In the plural it means the sacred writings as a whole, and in the singular it usually means a particular passage of Scripture, so “prophecy of the scripture” is any prophecy found written there. The Greek ou, “not”, joined with pâs, “every”, makes the statement cover each one of them.

The verb behind “is” is gínomai, to become or come into being, so Peter is speaking of how prophecy came about. Ídios means one’s own, and epílysis, found only here in the New Testament, means an unloosing, a solution or an explanation. Together they say that every prophecy in Scripture had its beginning in God, and the prophet’s own explanation of events was never its source.

“For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man.” Thélēma means will, choice, purpose or inclination, and “in old time” is the age of the prophets of Israel. The prophecy of that age began with God’s purpose, and he chose when and through whom it would come. Through Jeremiah God had condemned the false prophets of his day, who spoke a vision out of their own heart (Jeremiah 23:16), and the next chapter of Peter’s letter warns at length that false teachers like them would rise among believers (2 Peter 2). The pagan world had its oracles and seers as well, working in frenzy or by human craft, while the true prophets spoke under the Spirit’s sure guidance.

“But holy men of God spake.” These men were holy, set apart for God, and they were “of God”, belonging to him as his chosen instruments. They spoke, laléō, uttering real words in their own voices. “As they were moved by the Holy Ghost” tells us how. The verb is phérō, to bear or carry, and here it means to be carried along or borne along. The picture often drawn from it is a ship carried by the wind: the ship has its own build and its own sails, and the wind sets its course and drives it on. The Holy Ghost is the true author of what they spoke, so their words were God’s word.

Paul says the same of all Scripture, that it is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16), breathed out by him, which is the sense of his word theopneustos. He speaks too of words taught by the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:13). That is why the word of God is quick and powerful (Hebrews 4:12), and why Scripture speaks with one consistent voice across all its writers. Christ himself is the living Word, who was with God and was God (John 1:1), and the written word that the Spirit gave is God’s own word to us, true and trustworthy, given without error in its original writing, and the standard for all we believe and do.

Does “private interpretation” mean the Bible is only for experts?

This verse is about where prophecy came from, and verse 21 explains it in the next breath: “For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” The word epílysis speaks of the origin of the prophecy, and the reader’s understanding of it is a separate matter. Scripture commends the Bereans for their diligence with the Scriptures (Acts 17:11), and the Spirit who lives in believers opens the things of God to them (1 Corinthians 2:10–16). The verse does call us to humility as we read. The same Spirit who gave the word gives light to his people as they read it together, and our part is to seek the meaning God put there and to submit our minds to it.

How did God use the prophets themselves?

God used the whole person of each writer. Peter says that holy men “spake”, and they spoke as themselves, with their own vocabularies, experiences and styles, while the Spirit guided them so that what they gave was exactly what God intended. Luke tells of the careful research behind his Gospel (Luke 1:1–4), and Hebrews says that God spoke in time past by the prophets and in these last days by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–2). The divine and the human work together here, a truth often called concursive inspiration. The writers were active, thinking servants, and God was the source of the message and the guarantee of its truth.

The prophets and the apostles point to one Christ

Peter’s two witnesses meet in one person. The prophets, moved by the Spirit, spoke of the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow (1 Peter 1:10–11). Jesus said that the Scriptures testify of him (John 5:39) and that he came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17). After his resurrection he expounded to his disciples in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself (Luke 24:27), and said that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the law of Moses, the prophets and the psalms concerning him (Luke 24:44). Peter himself preached that God had fulfilled what he had shown by the mouth of his prophets, that Christ should suffer (Acts 3:18).

So the prophetic word is sure because God gave it, and it proved its truth in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), who is the end of the law (Romans 10:4) and in whom alone salvation is found. The opening of John’s Gospel (John 1:1–14) tells of the Word who made all things and became flesh, the one the prophets foretold and the apostles saw. And the Spirit who moved the prophets is the Spirit whom Christ sent to guide his apostles into all truth (John 16:13), so the witness of the apostles stands on the same ground as the witness of the prophets.

Two witnesses for the time before the dawn

This passage gives the church a firm place to stand. God has given us the witness of men who saw the majesty of his Son and heard the Father’s voice, and he has given us the word of the prophets, which his Spirit carried into their speech and writing. Both tell of the same Christ, and both are as sure as the God who stands behind them. The coming of Christ that the apostles preached is as real as the glory they saw on the mountain, because that glory was the majesty in which he will return.

The passage also shows us a God who speaks. He spoke from the excellent glory over his Son, he spoke through holy men by his Spirit, and he speaks still through what they wrote. Until the day dawns the world remains a dark place, and his word is the lamp he has put into our hands. Peter says that we do well to take heed to it, and the promise that comes with the lamp is the morning itself, when Christ the day star rises in the hearts of his people and the long night ends.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 2 Peter 1:19–21. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 3 verses
Passage under comment2 Peter 1:19–21
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In these words the apostle lays down another argument to prove the truth and reality of the gospel, and intimates that this second proof is more strong and convincing than the former, and more unanswerably makes out that the doctrine of the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ is not a mere fable or cunning contrivance of men, but the wise and wonderful counsel of the holy and gracious God. For this is foretold by the prophets and penmen of the Old Testament, who spoke and wrote under the influence and according to the direction of the Spirit of God. Here note,

I.The description that is given of the scriptures of the Old Testament: they are called a more sure word of prophecy.

1.It is a prophetical declaration of the power and coming, the Godhead and incarnation, of our Saviour, which we have in the Old Testament. It is there foretold that the seed of the woman shall bruise the serpent's head. His power to destroy the devil and his works, and his being made of a woman, are there foretold; and the great and awful Old Testament name of God, Jehovah (as read by some), signifies only He will be; and that name of God (Exodus 3:14) is rendered by many, I will be that I will be; and, thus understood, they point at God's being incarnate in order to the redemption and salvation of his people as what was to come. But the New Testament is a history of that whereof the Old Testament is a prophecy. All the prophets and the law prophesied until John, Matthew 11:13. And the evangelists and the apostles have written the history of what was before delivered as prophecy. Now the accomplishment of the Old Testament by the New, and the agreeableness of the New Testament to the Old, are a full demonstration of the truth of both. Read the Old Testament as a prophecy of Christ, and with diligence and thankfulness use the New as the best exposition of the Old.

2.The Old Testament is a more sure word of prophecy. It is so to the Jews who received it as the oracles of God. Following prophets confirmed what had been delivered by those who went before, and these prophecies had been written by the express command, and preserved by the special care, and many of them fulfilled by the wonderful providence of God, and therefore were more certain to those who had all along received and read the scriptures than the apostle's account of this voice from heaven. Moses and the prophets more powerfully persuade than even miracles themselves, Luke 16:31. How firm and sure should our faith be, who have such a firm and sure word to rest upon! All the prophecies of the Old Testament are more sure and certain to us who have the history of the most exact and minute accomplishment of them.

II.The encouragement the apostle gives us to search the scriptures.

He tells us, We do well if we take heed to them; that is, apply our minds to understand the sense, and our hearts to believe the truth, of this sure word, yea, bend ourselves to it, that we may be moulded and fashioned by it. The word is that form of doctrine into which we must be cast (Romans 6:17), that formulary of knowledge (Romans 2:20) by which we are to regulate our thoughts and sentiments, our words and confessions, our whole life and conversation. If we thus apply ourselves to the word of God, we certainly do well in all respects, what is pleasing to God and profitable to ourselves; and this indeed is but paying that regard which is due to the oracles of God. But, in order to this giving heed to the word, the apostle suggests some things that are of singular use to those who would attend to the scriptures to any good purpose.

1.They must account and use the scripture as a light which God hath sent into and set up in the world, to dispel that darkness which is upon the face of the whole earth. The word is a lamp to the feet of those who use it aright; this discovers the way wherein men ought to walk; this is the means whereby we come to know the way of life.

2.They must acknowledge their own darkness. This world is a place of error and ignorance, and every man in the world is naturally without that knowledge which is necessary in order to attain eternal life.

3.If ever men are made wise to salvation, it is by the shining of the word of God into their hearts. Natural notions of God are not sufficient for fallen man, who does at best actually know a great deal less, and yet does absolutely need to know a great deal more, of God than Adam did while he continued innocent.

4.When the light of the scripture is darted into the blind mind and dark understanding by the Holy Spirit of God, then the spiritual day dawns and the day-star arises in that soul. This enlightening of a dark benighted mind is like the day-break that improves and advances, spreads and diffuses itself through the whole soul, till it makes perfect day, Proverbs 4:18. It is a growing knowledge; those who are this way enlightened never think they know enough, till they come to know as they are known. To give heed to this light must needs be the interest and duty of all; and all who do truth come to this light, while evil-doers keep at a distance from it.

III.The apostle lays down one thing as previously necessary in order to our giving heed to, and getting good by, the scriptures, and that is the knowing that all prophecy is of divine origin. Now this important truth he not only asserts, but proves.

1.Observe, No scripture prophecy is of private interpretation (or a man's own proper opinion, an explication of his own mind), but the revelation of the mind of God. This was the difference between the prophets of the Lord and the false prophets who have been in the world. The prophets of the Lord did not speak nor do any thing of their own mind, as Moses, the chief of them, says expressly (Numbers 16:28), I have not done any of the works (nor delivered any of the statutes and ordinances) of my own mind. But false prophets speak a vision of their own heart, not out of the mouth of the Lord, Jeremiah 23:16. The prophets and penmen of the scripture spoke and wrote what was the mind of God; and though, when under the influence and guidance of the Spirit, it may well be supposed that they were willing to reveal and record such thing, yet it is because God would have them spoken and written. But though the scripture be not the effusion of man's own private opinion or inclination, but the revelation of the mind and will of God, yet every private man ought to search it, and come to understand the sense and meaning thereof.

2.This important truth of the divine origin of the scriptures (that what is contained in them is the mind of God and not of man) is to be known and owned by all who will give heed to the sure word of prophecy. That the scriptures are the word of God is not only an article of the true Christian's faith, but also a matter of science or knowledge. As a man not barely believes, but knows assuredly that that very person is his particular friend in whom he sees all the proper, peculiar, distinguishing marks and characters of his friend, so the Christian knows that book to be the word of God in and upon which he sees all the proper marks and characters of a divinely inspired book. He tastes a sweetness, and feels a power, and sees a glory, in it truly divine.

3.The divinity of the scriptures must be known and acknowledged in the first place, before men can profitably use them, before they can give good heed to them. To call off our minds from all other writings, and apply them in a peculiar manner to these as the only certain and infallible rule, necessarily requires our being fully persuaded that these are divinely inspired, and contain what is truly the mind and will of God.

IV.Seeing it is so absolutely necessary that persons be fully persuaded of the scripture's divine origin, the apostle (2 Peter 1:21) tells us how the Old Testament came to be compiled, and that,

1.Negatively: It came not by the will of man. Neither the things themselves that are recorded, and make up the several parts of the Old Testament, are the opinions of men, nor was the will of any of the prophets or penmen of the scriptures the rule or reason why any of those things were written which make up the canon of the scripture.

2.Affirmatively: Holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Observe,

(1.)They were holy men of God who were employed about that book which we receive as the word of God. If Balaam and Caiaphas, and others who were destitute of holiness, had any thing of the spirit of prophecy, upon occasion, yet such persons were not employed to write any part of the scriptures for the use of the church of God. All the penmen of the scriptures were holy men of God.

(2.)These holy men were moved by the Holy Ghost in what they delivered as the mind and will of God. The Holy Ghost is the supreme agent, the holy men are but instruments.

[1.]The Holy Ghost inspired and dictated to them what they were to deliver of the mind of God.

[2.]He powerfully excited and effectually engaged them to speak (and write) what he had put into their mouths.

[3.]He so wisely and carefully assisted and directed them in the delivery of what they had received from him that they were effectually secured from any the least mistake in expressing what they revealed; so that the very words of scripture are to be accounted the words of the Holy Ghost, and all the plainness and simplicity, all the power and virtue, all the elegance and propriety, of the very words and expressions are to be regarded by us as proceeding from God. Mix faith therefore with what you find in the scriptures; esteem and reverence your Bible as a book written by holy men, inspired, influenced, and assisted by the Holy Ghost.

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

5 quotes · AD 235–1022
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

For as the blessed prophets were made, so to speak, eyes for us, they foresaw through faith the mysteries of the word, and became ministers of these things also to succeeding generations, not only reporting the past, but also announcing I the present and the future, so that the prophet might not appear to be one only for the time being, but might also predict the future for all generations, and so be reckoned a (true) prophet. For these fathers were furnished with the Spirit, and largely honoured by the Word Himself; and just as it is with instruments of music. so had they the Word always, like the plectrum, in union with them, and when moved by Him the prophets announced what God willed. For they spake not of their own power (let there be no mistake as to that ), neither did they declare what pleased themselves. But First of all they were endowed with wisdom by the Word, and then again were rightly instructed in the future by means of visions. And then, when thus themselves fully convinced, they spake those things which were revealed by God to them alone, and concealed from all others. For with what reason should the prophet be called a prophet, unless he in spirit foresaw the future? For if the prophet spake of any chance event, he would not be a prophet then in speaking of things which were under the eye of aIl. But one who sets forth in detail things yet to be, was rightly judged a prophet. Wherefore prophets were with good reason called from the very first "seers." And hence we, too, who are rightly instructed in what was declared aforetime by them, speak not of our own capacity. For we do not attempt to made any change one way or another among ourselves in the words that were spoken of old by them, but we make the Scriptures in which these are written public, and read them to those who can believe rightly; for that is a common benefit for both parties: for him who speaks, in holding in memory and setting forth correctly things uttered of old; and for him who hears, in giving attention to the things spoken. Since, then, in this there is a work assigned to both parties together, viz., to him who speaks, that he speak forth faithfully without regard to risk, and to him who hears, that he hear and receive in faith that which is spoken, I beseech you to strive together with me in prayer to God.
d. AD 614Andreas of CaesareaEarly MedievalSourceCATENA
Peter does not say that the prophets interpreted their own sayings. They were not speaking to themselves but serving the Holy Spirit. What is the interpretation of their words if not the works which Christ revealed when he came? So if anyone wants to understand the words of the prophets properly, let him obtain faith in Jesus Christ, through which he will recognize the divine message. John bore witness before we did. Christ came from heaven, enlightening everyone. Likewise he showed that the power to prophesy is of the Holy Spirit, as did the apostle Paul when he said: “To another [the gift of] prophecy, etc.” So the one who prophesies is undoubtedly speaking with a tongue inspired by the Holy Spirit.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on the Catholic Epistles
For prophecy never came by the will of man, etc. They could always foretell the future; but the Spirit itself filled their hearts whenever it wished; thus, it was not in their power to teach whatever they wanted, but they spoke only what they had learned, enlightened by the Spirit. We say this so that no one may dare to interpret the Scriptures according to their own will. Someone has ridiculously interpreted these words of the blessed Peter, saying that just as a flute receives the breath of a human to sound, yet does not understand the sound it produces because it is of an insensible nature; so the prophets, inspired by the Spirit of God, uttered what the Spirit willed, yet did not retain in their minds what they said, according to that line of Virgil: "It gives a sound without a mind." This is clearly a most shameless error. For how could they give such sound advice for living to their listeners, if, being like the insane, they did not know what they were saying? Why, then, are they called seers? How is it written: "The word that Isaiah saw" (Isaiah 2), or any other prophet, if not because in the hidden, most lucid vision of heavenly matters they understood the mysteries that they then clearly expressed to their listeners in words?
AD 990Pseudo-OecumeniusEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on 2 Peter
Knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
Then, in explaining, Peter adds why his words were not interpreted as private or personal: at the same time, he also distinguishes true prophecy from demonic and false prophecies, which are found to operate in heretics, and says: "that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation." That is, indeed, the prophets receive prophecy from God, but not as they wish, but as the divine Spirit works in them moving them: and they certainly knew and understood the prophetic message sent to them, yet they did not make the interpretation themselves. That the prophets, moved by the divine Spirit, knew how the Spirit was sent to them from God is evident from the fact that they spoke voluntarily and said what they wished, while they remained silent on what they did not want to say; just as the prophet Jonah, refusing to preach in Nineveh (Jonah 1:3), and Balaam (Num. 22:13), commanded to speak what was suggested to him. However, the false prophets or the oracles of the Greeks did not have this: for they did not know while they were being agitated, but, having become mad with frenzy, they were unaware of what was happening to them, as if they were drunk.
Therefore, the holy prophets, I say the ancients, although they understood, did not, however, have to interpret what they predicted, but they served these things to others, namely to us. Likewise, so that the Lord's coming might remain hidden, and that traps might not be prepared for Him by the wicked. Indeed, even if the power of God could escape from assaults, it is likely that through extraordinary means of escape, the incarnation would appear as if it were a miraculous event. And that this is true is evident from the prophets who were in the New Testament, who also interpreted themselves while prophesying, although not in all cases, as the blessed Paul says in his earlier letter to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 14:21); for there was no such suspicion in the New Testament. Furthermore, it is also clear that the prophets did not prophecy outside of themselves.
When they prophesied with one spirit, both those in the Old Testament and those in the New, Paul says: "If, however, something is revealed to another sitting there, let the first be silent." (1 Cor. 14:30) From this, it is evident that the prophets, remaining in their natural consistency, prophesied spontaneously and intelligently. Therefore, when another rises to whom inspiration has been given, the one who was speaking first is commanded to be silent; which could not be found among mad prophets. For how will he be silent who does not even know what he is doing? Paul himself says that the energy of the Holy Spirit is in the prophets, speaking thus: "To one is given the word of wisdom, to another the word of prophecy." (1 Cor. 12:8)
"Knowing this first of all," etc. The prophets knew those things which were inspired in them by the prophetic spirit, and about which, however, they did not know exactly how each would be fulfilled. Therefore, understanding, they desired to see the outcome of these things: as the Lord also says.
d. AD 1022Symeon the New TheologianEarly MedievalSourceDISCOURSES 34.5
You see that it is not I who speak great and extraordinary things to your charity, but the Spirit of God who speaks in us. To this Peter, the chief apostle, bears witness when he says that no prophecy ever came by man, but holy men of God spoke, moved by the Holy Spirit. For though we are insignificant and unworthy, far from all holiness and from the holy men of God, yet we cannot deny the power that has been given to us by God.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying 2 Peter 1:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8