ข้ามไปยังเนื้อหา

2 Peter 1:21

“The Surety of Apostolic Testimony”· 2 Peter 1:16–21Read in context
King James Version
For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 the prophecy G4394 came G5342 not G3756 in old time G4218 by the will G2307 of man G444: but G235 holy G40 men G444 of God G2316 spake G2980 as they were moved G5342 by G5259 the Holy G40 Ghost G4151.
Complete Jewish Bible
for never has a prophecy come as a result of human willing — on the contrary, people moved by the Ruach HaKodesh spoke a message from God.
Berean Standard Bible
For no such prophecy was ever brought forth by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
American Standard Version
For no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Spirit.
World English Bible Messianic
For no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke, being moved by the Holy Spirit.
Geneva Bible (1599)
For the prophecie came not in olde time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost.
Young's Literal Translation
for not by will of man did ever prophecy come, but by the Holy Spirit borne on holy men of God spake.
ภาษาไทย · ThaiKJV
ด้วยว่าคำพยากรณ์ในอดีตนั้นไม่ได้มาจากความประสงค์ของมนุษย์ แต่พวกผู้บริสุทธิ์ของพระเจ้าได้กล่าวคำตามที่พระวิญญาณบริสุทธิ์ได้ทรงดลใจเขา
Translation

Study this verse

Summary

Second Peter 1:21 profoundly articulates the divine origin and authoritative nature of biblical prophecy, asserting that it did not arise from human initiative or desire. Instead, it was God's chosen instruments—"holy men"—who spoke forth divine revelation, not according to their own will, but as they were supernaturally guided and carried along by the Holy Spirit. This verse serves as a foundational declaration for the doctrine of biblical inspiration, emphasizing that Scripture is fundamentally God's word, not merely human wisdom.

Context

Literary Context

Second Peter is a powerful epistle written by the Apostle Peter to believers facing significant internal and external pressures, primarily from false teachers who denied the second coming of Christ and promoted libertinism. Peter's primary aim in this letter is to exhort believers to grow in their faith and knowledge of Christ, to contend for the truth, and to remember the certainty of God's promises and the divine origin of the Christian faith. In chapter 1, Peter emphasizes the divine power bestowed upon believers for life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3), and the reliability of the apostolic witness to Christ's majesty, particularly referencing the Transfiguration (2 Peter 1:16-18). Building on this, Peter declares that the prophetic word is even "more sure" than eyewitness testimony (2 Peter 1:19), and that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation (2 Peter 1:20). Verse 21 then provides the theological bedrock for these preceding assertions, explaining why prophecy is so utterly reliable and not subject to human interpretation: its ultimate source is divine, not human.

Historical & Cultural Context

The early church, like the Jewish community before it, deeply valued prophetic revelation as the direct communication of God's will. However, this period also saw the proliferation of false prophets and teachers, both within Judaism and among various pagan cults, who claimed divine inspiration but spoke from their own imaginations or demonic influence. Peter's audience would have been acutely aware of the dangers of deceptive teachings, as evidenced by his extensive warnings against false teachers throughout the letter (2 Peter 2). In this context, Peter's affirmation of the divine origin of true prophecy was crucial for establishing the authoritative foundation of Christian truth against humanly devised doctrines. The cultural landscape often saw oracles and seers operating under various forms of ecstatic states, but Peter differentiates biblical prophecy by emphasizing the Holy Spirit's sovereign, guiding influence, ensuring the message's purity and divine authorship, distinct from human manipulation or ecstatic frenzy.

Key Themes

This verse contributes significantly to several major theological themes within 2 Peter and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it unequivocally establishes the Divine Inspiration of Scripture, asserting that the prophetic word, and by extension all Scripture, is not a product of human thought or desire but originates directly from God. This highlights the supernatural nature and unique authority of the Bible. Secondly, it underscores the Sovereign Role of the Holy Spirit as the active agent in biblical inspiration, portraying Him as the divine force that "moved" or "carried along" the human authors. This emphasizes that while human personalities were involved, the message conveyed was precisely what God intended. Thirdly, the verse reinforces the Authority and Reliability of God's Word, presenting it as entirely trustworthy and free from human error or manipulation because it is God's direct communication. This contrasts sharply with humanly devised teachings and provides a firm foundation for faith, as seen in Peter's earlier emphasis on the "more sure word of prophecy" in 2 Peter 1:19. Finally, it draws a clear Distinction between Divine Revelation and Human Wisdom, separating God's truth from mere human speculation, opinion, or uninspired thoughts, a crucial discernment for believers facing false teaching.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

prophecy prophēteía' G4394

Meaning "prediction (scriptural or other)." In this context, it refers specifically to the divinely revealed messages delivered by God's spokespersons, encompassing both foretelling future events and forth-telling God's truth. Peter uses it to refer to the Old Testament Scriptures, which he considers to be divinely inspired and authoritative.

will thélēma' G2307

Meaning "a determination (properly, the thing), i.e. (actively) choice (specially, purpose, decree; abstractly, volition) or (passively) inclination." The phrase "by the will of man" signifies that prophecy did not originate from human decision, desire, or ingenuity. It was not a product of human intellect, imagination, or personal agenda, but rather transcended human volition entirely.

moved phérō' G5342

A primary verb meaning "to 'bear' or carry (in a very wide application, literally and figuratively)." This is a crucial term, often translated as "carried along" or "borne along." It implies a gentle yet irresistible divine impulse, akin to a ship being carried by the wind or currents. The prophets were not passive dictation machines, nor were they merely expressing their own thoughts. Rather, they were guided and directed by the Holy Spirit in such a way that their personalities and styles were used, yet the message conveyed was precisely what God intended, ensuring its accuracy and divine origin without overriding the human authors' faculties.

Verse Breakdown

"For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man:"

This opening clause immediately establishes a negative assertion, refuting the idea that biblical prophecy—the divinely inspired word found in the Old Testament—originated from human desire, intellect, or initiative. The phrase "in old time" refers to the past era of prophetic revelation, particularly the Old Testament prophets. This statement directly counters any notion that Scripture is merely a product of human genius, religious speculation, or personal agenda, setting it apart from all other forms of human literature or philosophy.

"but holy men of God spake"

This clause introduces the human agents involved in the process of revelation, but with significant qualifiers. They are identified as "holy men," indicating their consecration or dedication to God, and "of God," signifying that they belonged to God and were His chosen instruments. Crucially, they "spake" (Greek: laléō), meaning they uttered words, but the manner in which they spoke is immediately clarified by the subsequent phrase, emphasizing that their speaking was not self-initiated but divinely directed.

"[as they were] moved by the Holy Ghost."

This is the pivotal phrase, explaining the true source and mechanism of biblical inspiration. The Greek word for "moved" (phérō) signifies being "carried along" or "borne along," much like a ship carried by the wind. This imagery conveys that the Holy Spirit was the active, guiding force, gently but powerfully influencing the human authors. While the prophets retained their individuality and unique literary styles, their words were precisely what God intended, ensuring the divine authority and inerrancy of the message. The Holy Ghost (or Holy Spirit) is identified as the ultimate divine author, making the prophecy God's own word.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 2 Peter 1:21 is Contrast. The verse sharply contrasts the origin of prophecy: it did not come "by the will of man," but rather "holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." This antithetical structure highlights the fundamental difference between human-generated speech and divinely inspired revelation, emphasizing that the latter is entirely distinct and superior. Furthermore, the phrase "moved by the Holy Ghost" functions as a powerful Metaphor or Imagery. The Greek word phérō (moved) evokes the image of a ship being carried along by the wind or currents, suggesting a gentle yet irresistible divine impulse. This metaphor illustrates that the human authors were not passive, robotic dictation machines, but rather active participants whose personalities and styles were used, yet who were supernaturally guided and propelled by the Holy Spirit to convey God's precise message. This imagery underscores the dynamic interplay between divine sovereignty and human agency in the process of biblical inspiration.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Second Peter 1:21 is a cornerstone text for the doctrine of the divine inspiration of Scripture, articulating that the Bible is not merely human literature but the very word of God. It asserts that God, through the Holy Spirit, superintended the human authors of Scripture so that, using their own personalities and literary styles, they composed and recorded without error God's revelation to humanity in the original manuscripts. This process, often referred to as "concursive inspiration," ensures that the Bible is simultaneously fully human and fully divine, a unique characteristic that sets it apart from all other books. This truth undergirds the Bible's authority, infallibility, and inerrancy, making it the supreme standard for faith and life. It reveals God's character as one who communicates clearly and reliably with His creation, providing a trustworthy guide for understanding His will and His plan of salvation.

Reflection and Application

Understanding that "holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" should profoundly impact our approach to the Bible. It instills immense confidence in Scripture's trustworthiness, assuring us that when we read the Bible, we are encountering not merely ancient human thoughts, but the very words of the living God. This truth calls us to approach the Bible with reverence, humility, and a deep desire to hear God's voice, recognizing its ultimate authority over all areas of life. It compels us to diligently study its pages, knowing that it is infallible in its truth and sufficient for equipping us for every good work. Furthermore, this verse serves as a crucial criterion for discerning truth from error: any teaching or doctrine that contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture, regardless of its source or popularity, does not come "by the will of man" but is rather a human invention, lacking divine authority. Just as the Spirit moved the prophets to speak, we rely on the same Holy Spirit to illuminate our understanding of God's inspired Word, guiding us into all truth and transforming our hearts and minds.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the understanding that Scripture is "moved by the Holy Ghost" deepen your trust and confidence in the Bible's authority and truthfulness?
  2. In what ways might approaching the Bible as merely human literature diminish its power and impact on your life?
  3. How can the Holy Spirit's role in inspiring Scripture inform your own prayer life and your desire for the Spirit's guidance in understanding God's Word?
  4. What practical steps can you take to ensure that your beliefs and practices are truly aligned with God's divinely inspired Word, rather than human opinions or cultural trends?

FAQ

Does "moved by the Holy Ghost" imply that the biblical authors were merely passive instruments, like robots or dictation machines?

No, the Greek word phérō (G5342), translated as "moved" or "carried along," does not imply passive dictation. Instead, it suggests a dynamic, superintending influence. The imagery is often likened to a ship being carried by the wind: the ship has its own structure and sails, but its direction and progress are determined by the wind. Similarly, the Holy Spirit guided and directed the human authors, using their unique personalities, vocabularies, experiences, and literary styles, yet ensuring that the final written product was precisely what God intended, without error. This process is known as "concursive inspiration," where divine and human agency work together seamlessly to produce God's infallible Word. The authors were active participants, researching, thinking, and writing, but always under the Spirit's sovereign guidance, as seen in passages like Luke 1:1-4.

If prophecy came "not by the will of man," does this mean humans played no role in the Bible's creation?

While the will of man was not the originating source of prophecy, humans were indeed the chosen instruments through whom God spoke. The verse states "holy men of God spake," indicating their active participation. The emphasis is on the source of the message, not the absence of human involvement. God chose specific individuals, prepared them, and then supernaturally enabled them to communicate His truth. Their personalities, experiences, and historical contexts were all used by God, but the ultimate content and truthfulness of the message were divinely guaranteed, ensuring that the message was God's word, not merely their own. This is consistent with how God often works through human agents throughout biblical history, from Moses to the apostles, as described in Hebrews 1:1-2.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Second Peter 1:21, in declaring the divine origin of prophecy through the Holy Spirit, finds its ultimate fulfillment and validation in Jesus Christ. He is the very Living Word of God (John 1:1), the supreme revelation of God to humanity, embodying the truth that prophecy merely foretold. Every prophecy "moved by the Holy Ghost" ultimately points to Him, finding its meaning and culmination in His person and work. Jesus Himself consistently affirmed the divine authority and inerrancy of the Old Testament Scriptures, which were the "prophecy" Peter referenced, declaring that "all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me" (Luke 24:44). His life, death, and resurrection are the precise fulfillment of what the Spirit-inspired prophets had spoken for centuries (Acts 3:18). Furthermore, Christ, after His ascension, sent the Holy Spirit—the very Spirit who "moved" the prophets—to guide His apostles "into all truth" (John 16:13), thereby continuing the process of divine revelation that culminated in the New Testament. Thus, 2 Peter 1:21 not only establishes the divine trustworthiness of God's written Word but also profoundly underscores that this Word is fundamentally a witness to Jesus Christ, the ultimate and perfect revelation of God.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Peter 1:19–21. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 3 verses
Passage under comment2 Peter 1:19–21
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In these words the apostle lays down another argument to prove the truth and reality of the gospel, and intimates that this second proof is more strong and convincing than the former, and more unanswerably makes out that the doctrine of the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ is not a mere fable or cunning contrivance of men, but the wise and wonderful counsel of the holy and gracious God. For this is foretold by the prophets and penmen of the Old Testament, who spoke and wrote under the influence and according to the direction of the Spirit of God. Here note,

I.The description that is given of the scriptures of the Old Testament: they are called a more sure word of prophecy.

1.It is a prophetical declaration of the power and coming, the Godhead and incarnation, of our Saviour, which we have in the Old Testament. It is there foretold that the seed of the woman shall bruise the serpent's head. His power to destroy the devil and his works, and his being made of a woman, are there foretold; and the great and awful Old Testament name of God, Jehovah (as read by some), signifies only He will be; and that name of God (Exo 3:14) is rendered by many, I will be that I will be; and, thus understood, they point at God's being incarnate in order to the redemption and salvation of his people as what was to come. But the New Testament is a history of that whereof the Old Testament is a prophecy. All the prophets and the law prophesied until John, Mat 11:13. And the evangelists and the apostles have written the history of what was before delivered as prophecy. Now the accomplishment of the Old Testament by the New, and the agreeableness of the New Testament to the Old, are a full demonstration of the truth of both. Read the Old Testament as a prophecy of Christ, and with diligence and thankfulness use the New as the best exposition of the Old.

2.The Old Testament is a more sure word of prophecy. It is so to the Jews who received it as the oracles of God. Following prophets confirmed what had been delivered by those who went before, and these prophecies had been written by the express command, and preserved by the special care, and many of them fulfilled by the wonderful providence of God, and therefore were more certain to those who had all along received and read the scriptures than the apostle's account of this voice from heaven. Moses and the prophets more powerfully persuade than even miracles themselves, Luk 16:31. How firm and sure should our faith be, who have such a firm and sure word to rest upon! All the prophecies of the Old Testament are more sure and certain to us who have the history of the most exact and minute accomplishment of them.

II.The encouragement the apostle gives us to search the scriptures.

He tells us, We do well if we take heed to them; that is, apply our minds to understand the sense, and our hearts to believe the truth, of this sure word, yea, bend ourselves to it, that we may be moulded and fashioned by it. The word is that form of doctrine into which we must be cast (Rom 6:17), that formulary of knowledge (Rom 2:20) by which we are to regulate our thoughts and sentiments, our words and confessions, our whole life and conversation. If we thus apply ourselves to the word of God, we certainly do well in all respects, what is pleasing to God and profitable to ourselves; and this indeed is but paying that regard which is due to the oracles of God. But, in order to this giving heed to the word, the apostle suggests some things that are of singular use to those who would attend to the scriptures to any good purpose.

1.They must account and use the scripture as a light which God hath sent into and set up in the world, to dispel that darkness which is upon the face of the whole earth. The word is a lamp to the feet of those who use it aright; this discovers the way wherein men ought to walk; this is the means whereby we come to know the way of life.

2.They must acknowledge their own darkness. This world is a place of error and ignorance, and every man in the world is naturally without that knowledge which is necessary in order to attain eternal life.

3.If ever men are made wise to salvation, it is by the shining of the word of God into their hearts. Natural notions of God are not sufficient for fallen man, who does at best actually know a great deal less, and yet does absolutely need to know a great deal more, of God than Adam did while he continued innocent.

4.When the light of the scripture is darted into the blind mind and dark understanding by the Holy Spirit of God, then the spiritual day dawns and the day-star arises in that soul. This enlightening of a dark benighted mind is like the day-break that improves and advances, spreads and diffuses itself through the whole soul, till it makes perfect day, Pro 4:18. It is a growing knowledge; those who are this way enlightened never think they know enough, till they come to know as they are known. To give heed to this light must needs be the interest and duty of all; and all who do truth come to this light, while evil-doers keep at a distance from it.

III.The apostle lays down one thing as previously necessary in order to our giving heed to, and getting good by, the scriptures, and that is the knowing that all prophecy is of divine origin. Now this important truth he not only asserts, but proves.

1.Observe, No scripture prophecy is of private interpretation (or a man's own proper opinion, an explication of his own mind), but the revelation of the mind of God. This was the difference between the prophets of the Lord and the false prophets who have been in the world. The prophets of the Lord did not speak nor do any thing of their own mind, as Moses, the chief of them, says expressly (Num 16:28), I have not done any of the works (nor delivered any of the statutes and ordinances) of my own mind. But false prophets speak a vision of their own heart, not out of the mouth of the Lord, Jer 23:16. The prophets and penmen of the scripture spoke and wrote what was the mind of God; and though, when under the influence and guidance of the Spirit, it may well be supposed that they were willing to reveal and record such thing, yet it is because God would have them spoken and written. But though the scripture be not the effusion of man's own private opinion or inclination, but the revelation of the mind and will of God, yet every private man ought to search it, and come to understand the sense and meaning thereof.

2.This important truth of the divine origin of the scriptures (that what is contained in them is the mind of God and not of man) is to be known and owned by all who will give heed to the sure word of prophecy. That the scriptures are the word of God is not only an article of the true Christian's faith, but also a matter of science or knowledge. As a man not barely believes, but knows assuredly that that very person is his particular friend in whom he sees all the proper, peculiar, distinguishing marks and characters of his friend, so the Christian knows that book to be the word of God in and upon which he sees all the proper marks and characters of a divinely inspired book. He tastes a sweetness, and feels a power, and sees a glory, in it truly divine.

3.The divinity of the scriptures must be known and acknowledged in the first place, before men can profitably use them, before they can give good heed to them. To call off our minds from all other writings, and apply them in a peculiar manner to these as the only certain and infallible rule, necessarily requires our being fully persuaded that these are divinely inspired, and contain what is truly the mind and will of God.

IV.Seeing it is so absolutely necessary that persons be fully persuaded of the scripture's divine origin, the apostle (Pe2 1:21) tells us how the Old Testament came to be compiled, and that,

1.Negatively: It came not by the will of man. Neither the things themselves that are recorded, and make up the several parts of the Old Testament, are the opinions of men, nor was the will of any of the prophets or penmen of the scriptures the rule or reason why any of those things were written which make up the canon of the scripture.

2.Affirmatively: Holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Observe,

(1.)They were holy men of God who were employed about that book which we receive as the word of God. If Balaam and Caiaphas, and others who were destitute of holiness, had any thing of the spirit of prophecy, upon occasion, yet such persons were not employed to write any part of the scriptures for the use of the church of God. All the penmen of the scriptures were holy men of God.

(2.)These holy men were moved by the Holy Ghost in what they delivered as the mind and will of God. The Holy Ghost is the supreme agent, the holy men are but instruments.

[1.]The Holy Ghost inspired and dictated to them what they were to deliver of the mind of God.

[2.]He powerfully excited and effectually engaged them to speak (and write) what he had put into their mouths.

[3.]He so wisely and carefully assisted and directed them in the delivery of what they had received from him that they were effectually secured from any the least mistake in expressing what they revealed; so that the very words of scripture are to be accounted the words of the Holy Ghost, and all the plainness and simplicity, all the power and virtue, all the elegance and propriety, of the very words and expressions are to be regarded by us as proceeding from God. Mix faith therefore with what you find in the scriptures; esteem and reverence your Bible as a book written by holy men, inspired, influenced, and assisted by the Holy Ghost.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

5 quotes · AD 235–1022
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

For as the blessed prophets were made, so to speak, eyes for us, they foresaw through faith the mysteries of the word, and became ministers of these things also to succeeding generations, not only reporting the past, but also announcing I the present and the future, so that the prophet might not appear to be one only for the time being, but might also predict the future for all generations, and so be reckoned a (true) prophet. For these fathers were furnished with the Spirit, and largely honoured by the Word Himself; and just as it is with instruments of music. so had they the Word always, like the plectrum, in union with them, and when moved by Him the prophets announced what God willed. For they spake not of their own power (let there be no mistake as to that ), neither did they declare what pleased themselves. But First of all they were endowed with wisdom by the Word, and then again were rightly instructed in the future by means of visions. And then, when thus themselves fully convinced, they spake those things which were revealed by God to them alone, and concealed from all others. For with what reason should the prophet be called a prophet, unless he in spirit foresaw the future? For if the prophet spake of any chance event, he would not be a prophet then in speaking of things which were under the eye of aIl. But one who sets forth in detail things yet to be, was rightly judged a prophet. Wherefore prophets were with good reason called from the very first "seers." And hence we, too, who are rightly instructed in what was declared aforetime by them, speak not of our own capacity. For we do not attempt to made any change one way or another among ourselves in the words that were spoken of old by them, but we make the Scriptures in which these are written public, and read them to those who can believe rightly; for that is a common benefit for both parties: for him who speaks, in holding in memory and setting forth correctly things uttered of old; and for him who hears, in giving attention to the things spoken. Since, then, in this there is a work assigned to both parties together, viz., to him who speaks, that he speak forth faithfully without regard to risk, and to him who hears, that he hear and receive in faith that which is spoken, I beseech you to strive together with me in prayer to God.
AD 614Andreas of CaesareaEarly MedievalSourceCATENA
Peter does not say that the prophets interpreted their own sayings. They were not speaking to themselves but serving the Holy Spirit. What is the interpretation of their words if not the works which Christ revealed when he came? So if anyone wants to understand the words of the prophets properly, let him obtain faith in Jesus Christ, through which he will recognize the divine message. John bore witness before we did. Christ came from heaven, enlightening everyone. Likewise he showed that the power to prophesy is of the Holy Spirit, as did the apostle Paul when he said: “To another [the gift of] prophecy, etc.” So the one who prophesies is undoubtedly speaking with a tongue inspired by the Holy Spirit.
For prophecy never came by the will of man, etc. They could always foretell the future; but the Spirit itself filled their hearts whenever it wished; thus, it was not in their power to teach whatever they wanted, but they spoke only what they had learned, enlightened by the Spirit. We say this so that no one may dare to interpret the Scriptures according to their own will. Someone has ridiculously interpreted these words of the blessed Peter, saying that just as a flute receives the breath of a human to sound, yet does not understand the sound it produces because it is of an insensible nature; so the prophets, inspired by the Spirit of God, uttered what the Spirit willed, yet did not retain in their minds what they said, according to that line of Virgil: "It gives a sound without a mind." This is clearly a most shameless error. For how could they give such sound advice for living to their listeners, if, being like the insane, they did not know what they were saying? Why, then, are they called seers? How is it written: "The word that Isaiah saw" (Isaiah 2), or any other prophet, if not because in the hidden, most lucid vision of heavenly matters they understood the mysteries that they then clearly expressed to their listeners in words?
AD 990OecumeniusEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on 2 Peter
Knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
Then, in explaining, Peter adds why his words were not interpreted as private or personal: at the same time, he also distinguishes true prophecy from demonic and false prophecies, which are found to operate in heretics, and says: "that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation." That is, indeed, the prophets receive prophecy from God, but not as they wish, but as the divine Spirit works in them moving them: and they certainly knew and understood the prophetic message sent to them, yet they did not make the interpretation themselves. That the prophets, moved by the divine Spirit, knew how the Spirit was sent to them from God is evident from the fact that they spoke voluntarily and said what they wished, while they remained silent on what they did not want to say; just as the prophet Jonah, refusing to preach in Nineveh (Jonah 1:3), and Balaam (Num. 22:13), commanded to speak what was suggested to him. However, the false prophets or the oracles of the Greeks did not have this: for they did not know while they were being agitated, but, having become mad with frenzy, they were unaware of what was happening to them, as if they were drunk.
Therefore, the holy prophets, I say the ancients, although they understood, did not, however, have to interpret what they predicted, but they served these things to others, namely to us. Likewise, so that the Lord's coming might remain hidden, and that traps might not be prepared for Him by the wicked. Indeed, even if the power of God could escape from assaults, it is likely that through extraordinary means of escape, the incarnation would appear as if it were a miraculous event. And that this is true is evident from the prophets who were in the New Testament, who also interpreted themselves while prophesying, although not in all cases, as the blessed Paul says in his earlier letter to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 14:21); for there was no such suspicion in the New Testament. Furthermore, it is also clear that the prophets did not prophecy outside of themselves.
When they prophesied with one spirit, both those in the Old Testament and those in the New, Paul says: "If, however, something is revealed to another sitting there, let the first be silent." (1 Cor. 14:30) From this, it is evident that the prophets, remaining in their natural consistency, prophesied spontaneously and intelligently. Therefore, when another rises to whom inspiration has been given, the one who was speaking first is commanded to be silent; which could not be found among mad prophets. For how will he be silent who does not even know what he is doing? Paul himself says that the energy of the Holy Spirit is in the prophets, speaking thus: "To one is given the word of wisdom, to another the word of prophecy." (1 Cor. 12:8)
"Knowing this first of all," etc. The prophets knew those things which were inspired in them by the prophetic spirit, and about which, however, they did not know exactly how each would be fulfilled. Therefore, understanding, they desired to see the outcome of these things: as the Lord also says.
AD 1022Symeon the New TheologianEarly MedievalSourceDISCOURSES 34.5
You see that it is not I who speak great and extraordinary things to your charity, but the Spirit of God who speaks in us. To this Peter, the chief apostle, bears witness when he says that no prophecy ever came by man, but holy men of God spoke, moved by the Holy Spirit. For though we are insignificant and unworthy, far from all holiness and from the holy men of God, yet we cannot deny the power that has been given to us by God.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Peter 1:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8