Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
At that time did Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the temple of the LORD, and from the pillars which Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid, and gave it to the king of Assyria.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
At that time H6256 did Hezekiah H2396 cut off H7112 the gold from the doors H1817 of the temple H1964 of the LORD H3068, and from the pillars H547 which Hezekiah H2396 king H4428 of Judah H3063 had overlaid H6823, and gave H5414 it to the king H4428 of Assyria H804.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
It was at that time that Hizkiyahu stripped the gold from the doors of the sanctuary of ADONAI and from the doorposts which Hizkiyahu king of Y'hudah himself had overlaid, and gave it to the king of Ashur.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
At that time Hezekiah stripped the gold with which he had plated the doors and doorposts of the temple of the LORD, and he gave it to the king of Assyria.
Ask
American Standard Version
At that time did Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the temple of Jehovah, and from the pillars which Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid, and gave it to the king of Assyria.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
At that time, Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the LORD’s temple, and from the pillars which Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid, and gave it to the king of Assyria.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
At the same season did Hezekiah pul off the plates of the doores of the Temple of the Lord, and the pillars (which the sayd Hezekiah King of Iudah had couered ouer) and gaue them to the King of Asshur.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
at that time hath Hezekiah cut off the doors of the temple of Jehovah, and the pillars that Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid, and giveth them to the king of Asshur.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Hoshea and the Fall of Samaria
Hoshea and the Fall of Samaria View full PDF
Hezekiah and Sennacherib
Hezekiah and Sennacherib View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 10,041 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Kings 18:16 records the desperate and profoundly symbolic act of King Hezekiah, who, under the immense pressure of the invading Assyrian army led by Sennacherib, stripped the gold from the very doors and pillars of the temple of the LORD—elements he himself had previously adorned. This drastic measure was part of an exorbitant tribute paid to avert the destruction of Jerusalem, highlighting the extreme national crisis Judah faced, the futility of human appeasement in the face of divine judgment, and the ultimate need for God's sovereign deliverance.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the narrative of King Hezekiah's reign, immediately following a period of significant national crisis. The preceding verses establish Hezekiah as a righteous king who initiated widespread religious reforms, including the destruction of idolatrous altars and the bronze serpent Nehushtan (2 Kings 18:3-4). However, his bold rebellion against Assyrian overlordship, explicitly stated in 2 Kings 18:7, provoked the wrath of Sennacherib, leading to a devastating invasion of Judah, detailed from 2 Kings 18:13 onward. Faced with the capture of fortified cities and immense pressure, Hezekiah sent a desperate message to Sennacherib at Lachish, agreeing to pay whatever tribute was demanded (2 Kings 18:14). Having already exhausted the treasures from the temple and the royal palace in 2 Kings 18:15, verse 16 describes the extreme and sacrilegious measure of stripping the temple's sacred gold, setting the stage for Sennacherib's continued insolence and God's eventual, miraculous intervention.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The late 8th century BCE was dominated by the Neo-Assyrian Empire, a formidable and ruthless military power. Sennacherib's invasion of Judah in 701 BCE was a direct response to Hezekiah's alignment with Egypt and Philistia, challenging Assyrian supremacy. Assyrian foreign policy frequently involved demanding heavy tribute from vassal states; failure to comply resulted in swift and brutal military campaigns, often culminating in the siege and destruction of cities, followed by the mass deportation of populations. The temple in Jerusalem was not merely a religious edifice but also served as a national treasury and the preeminent symbol of Judah's identity, its covenant relationship with God, and His protective presence. Stripping its gold was an act of profound desperation, a last resort to preserve the city and its inhabitants from the horrors of an Assyrian siege and the fate of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, which had already been exiled by Assyria (2 Kings 17:6). This act, while a deep humiliation and sacrilege, was culturally understood as an extreme, albeit desperate, means of appeasing a superior power to avoid total annihilation.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes within 2 Kings and the broader Deuteronomistic History. It starkly illustrates the theme of desperation and compromise under extreme duress, revealing how even a king renowned for his righteousness could resort to defacing the sacred house of God in a desperate bid to save his kingdom. It powerfully highlights the futility of human solutions when divine intervention is truly required; despite this immense material sacrifice, Sennacherib remained unappeased, demonstrating that true deliverance would not come through material appeasement but solely through God's power (2 Kings 19:35). The act also underscores the sanctity and profound significance of the Temple as the dwelling place of the LORD, making Hezekiah's action particularly poignant and a stark contrast to his earlier zeal for temple reform and purification (2 Kings 18:4). Ultimately, the narrative arc moves towards emphasizing God's sovereignty and unwavering faithfulness, even when His people falter, as Hezekiah's subsequent prayer and God's miraculous deliverance would powerfully attest (2 Kings 19:19 and 2 Kings 19:35).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • cut off (Hebrew, qâtsats', H7112): This primitive root means "to chop off (literally or figuratively); cut (asunder, in pieces, in sunder, off), [idiom] utmost." In this context, it vividly describes the violent and destructive nature of Hezekiah's act. It implies not a gentle removal but a forceful detachment, emphasizing the desecration of the temple's adorned elements. The gold was not merely taken, but "cut off," suggesting a desperate, almost brutal, expediency driven by the extreme pressure of the Assyrian threat.
  • temple (Hebrew, hêykâl', H1964): This word refers to "a large public building, such as a palace or temple." In the context of the LORD, it specifically denotes the sacred dwelling place of God in Jerusalem. The stripping of gold from the "temple of the LORD" signifies a profound act of desperation and compromise, as it directly impacted the physical manifestation of God's glory and presence among His people. This act underscores the severity of the crisis and the extent to which Hezekiah was willing to go.
  • overlaid (Hebrew, tsâphâh', H6823): This primitive root means "to sheet over (especially with metal); cover, overlay." This term refers to the practice of covering wooden or stone structures with precious metals for beauty, honor, and symbolic value. The text's specific mention that Hezekiah himself had "overlaid" these pillars and doors adds a layer of tragic irony. His act of "cutting off" the gold represents a reversal of his own previous pious work, underscoring the depth of his desperation and the profound irony of a righteous king undoing his own acts of devotion.

Verse Breakdown

  • "At that time did Hezekiah cut off [the gold from] the doors of the temple of the LORD": This opening clause immediately situates the event within the dire context of the Assyrian invasion. Hezekiah, renowned for his righteousness and temple reforms, is now depicted engaging in an act of desecration. The KJV's bracketed "the gold from" clarifies that it was the precious metal overlay, not the structural doors themselves, that was forcibly removed. This gold would have been a significant part of the temple's beauty, wealth, and symbolic value, representing the glory and honor dedicated to God. The act signifies a profound compromise and a desperate attempt to meet Sennacherib's exorbitant demands.
  • "and [from] the pillars which Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid": This clause further specifies the extent of the stripping, including the temple's pillars. The explicit detail that Hezekiah himself had "overlaid" these elements adds a poignant layer of personal sacrifice and tragic irony. It was not just any gold, but gold he had personally dedicated and invested in, now being sacrificed. This highlights the immense pressure Hezekiah was under, forcing him to undo his own acts of devotion and piety for the sake of his kingdom's survival.
  • "and gave it to the king of Assyria": This final clause states the direct purpose and recipient of this desperate act: to pay the tribute demanded by Sennacherib. It underscores the ultimate futility of this material sacrifice, as the subsequent narrative reveals that Sennacherib was not appeased and continued his aggression against Jerusalem. The gold, consecrated for God's glory and the beauty of His sanctuary, was now handed over to a pagan king, symbolizing a temporary, desperate submission to an earthly power rather than a full reliance on divine protection and provision.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several Literary Devices to convey its powerful and tragic message. Irony is profoundly prominent, as the righteous King Hezekiah, who had previously purified and honored the temple, is now compelled to deface it. This reversal of his own pious acts underscores the depth of his desperation and the dire circumstances he faced. Symbolism is also richly at play: the stripping of the gold from the temple doors and pillars symbolizes the stripping away of Judah's pride, its perceived security, and perhaps even a temporary compromise of its spiritual integrity under overwhelming external pressure. The temple, a potent symbol of God's presence and protection, is shown to be vulnerable to human actions and external threats, highlighting the fragility of human security and the limitations of material offerings. The narrative also uses Contrast between Hezekiah's earlier zealous reforms and this desperate act, emphasizing the extreme circumstances that led to such a profound and painful compromise.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse powerfully illustrates the tension between human reliance and divine sovereignty. Hezekiah's desperate act of defacing the temple, a place consecrated to God and adorned for His glory, reveals the limits of human ingenuity and material sacrifice in the face of overwhelming threats. Theologically, it highlights the danger of compromising sacred principles or values, even when under extreme duress. While understandable from a human perspective as a last resort to save his people, this action ultimately proved ineffective in appeasing Sennacherib, underscoring that true deliverance comes not from human appeasement or material offerings, but from God's sovereign intervention. It serves as a stark reminder that our ultimate security and salvation rest in God's faithfulness and power, not in our ability to manipulate circumstances or sacrifice what is sacred.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

King Hezekiah's desperate act in 2 Kings 18:16 serves as a poignant reminder that even the most devout leaders and individuals can be pushed to the brink of compromise when faced with overwhelming fear and pressure. In our own lives, we often encounter "Assyrian" threats—be they financial crises, relational conflicts, health scares, or professional pressures—where the temptation to take matters into our own hands, or to sacrifice our spiritual convictions for perceived immediate relief, becomes incredibly strong. This narrative challenges us to critically examine where our ultimate trust lies. Do we, like Hezekiah initially, resort to human solutions and material sacrifices, even at the expense of what is sacred, when faced with overwhelming challenges? Or do we, like Hezekiah later in the narrative, turn wholeheartedly to God in prayer, trusting in His sovereign power and miraculous deliverance, even when circumstances seem dire and all human options appear exhausted? This verse calls us to guard against the slippery slope of compromise, to remember the sanctity of our commitments to God, and to cultivate a deep-seated faith that believes God's deliverance is greater than any human threat or material offering we might attempt to make.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "gold" in your life—whether resources, values, or spiritual commitments—might you be tempted to "cut off" or compromise when under extreme pressure?
  • How does Hezekiah's initial response here, driven by fear and human calculation, contrast with his later, more faithful response in the face of continued Assyrian threats?
  • In what ways does this story encourage you to seek God's intervention and rely on His power rather than solely on human solutions when facing overwhelming challenges?

FAQ

Why did Hezekiah strip the temple of its gold, especially after being a righteous king?

Answer: Hezekiah stripped the temple of its gold out of extreme desperation to appease Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, who had invaded Judah and captured many of its fortified cities (2 Kings 18:13). Sennacherib had demanded an exorbitant tribute of silver and gold (2 Kings 18:14), and after exhausting the palace and temple treasuries (2 Kings 18:15), Hezekiah resorted to stripping the gold overlay from the temple's doors and pillars. This was a last-ditch effort to prevent Jerusalem's destruction and the deportation of its people, reflecting the immense pressure and fear he faced from the formidable Assyrian Empire. It was a profound, albeit temporary, compromise driven by political necessity and the immediate threat of annihilation.

Did Hezekiah's act of paying tribute and stripping the temple work in appeasing Sennacherib?

Answer: Temporarily, it seemed to buy some time, but ultimately, no. Despite Hezekiah's massive tribute, including the gold from the temple, Sennacherib was not satisfied. He continued his advance and sent his high-ranking officials (the Rabshakeh, Tartan, and Rabsaris) with a large army to Jerusalem to demand the city's surrender and to mock Judah's trust in the LORD (2 Kings 18:17-35). This demonstrates the futility of relying solely on human efforts and material sacrifices to solve spiritual or existential crises. True deliverance for Jerusalem would come later, not through this desperate tribute, but through God's miraculous intervention in response to Hezekiah's humble prayer and Isaiah's prophecy (2 Kings 19:35).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hezekiah's desperate act of stripping the gold from the temple, a place of divine dwelling and glory, serves as a poignant foreshadowing of a far greater "stripping" and sacrifice that would ultimately bring true and lasting deliverance for all humanity. The physical temple, with its precious adornments, symbolized God's presence among His people, yet it was vulnerable to human actions and external threats, ultimately proving insufficient for ultimate salvation. In the New Covenant, Jesus Christ is revealed as the true and ultimate Temple, the very dwelling place of God among humanity (John 1:14 and John 2:19-21). Unlike the physical temple, which could be stripped of its material wealth, Christ willingly "emptied himself" (Greek: kenosis), not of gold, but of His divine glory and privileges, taking on the form of a servant and humbling Himself even to death on a cross (Philippians 2:7-8). He was "stripped" not of material adornments, but of His garments, His dignity, and ultimately His life, becoming the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for the sins of the world (Matthew 27:28 and Hebrews 9:26). Where Hezekiah's sacrifice was insufficient and temporary, securing only a brief reprieve from an earthly enemy, Christ's sacrifice was perfect, eternal, and all-sufficient, securing not merely a temporary political victory but eternal salvation from sin and death (Hebrews 10:10-14). Thus, the desperate act of a human king to save his earthly kingdom points forward to the divine act of the King of Kings, who, through His own profound stripping and ultimate sacrifice, truly delivered His people and established a new, indestructible spiritual temple—His body, the Church (1 Corinthians 3:16).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 18 verses 9–16

The kingdom of Assyria had now grown considerable, though we never read of it till the last reign. Such changes there are in the affairs of nations and families: those that have been despicable become formidable, and those, on the contrary, are brought low that have made a great noise and figure. We have here an account,

I. Of the success of Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, against Israel, his besieging Samaria (Kg2 18:9), taking it (Kg2 18:10), and carrying the people into captivity (Kg2 18:11), with the reason why God brought this judgment upon them (Kg2 18:12): Because they obeyed not the voice of the Lord their God. This was related more largely in the foregoing chapter, but it is here repeated, 1. As that which stirred up Hezekiah and his people to purge out idolatry with so much zeal, because they saw the ruin which it brought upon Israel. When their neighbour's house was on fire, and their own in danger, it was time to cast away the accursed thing. 2. As that which Hezekiah much lamented, but had not strength to prevent. Though the ten tribes had revolted from, and often been vexatious to, the house of David, no longer ago than in his father's reign, yet being of the seed of Israel he could not be glad at their calamities. 3. As that which laid Hezekiah and his kingdom open to the king of Assyria, and made it much more easy for him to invade the land. It is said of the ten tribes here that they would neither hear God's commandments nor do them, Kg2 18:12. Many will be content to give God the hearing that will give him no more (Eze 33:31), but these, being resolved not to do their duty, did not care to hear of it.

II. Of the attempt of Sennacherib, the succeeding king of Assyria, against Judah, in which he was encouraged by his predecessor's success against Israel, whose honours he would vie with and whose victories he would push forward. The descent he made upon Judah was a great calamity to that kingdom, by which God would try the faith of Hezekiah and chastise the people, who are called a hypocritical nation (Isa 10:6), because they did not comply with Hezekiah's reformation, nor willingly part with their idols, but kept them up in their hearts, and perhaps in their houses, though their high places were removed. Even times of reformation may prove troublesome times, made so by those that oppose it, and then the blame is laid upon the reformers. This calamity will appear great upon Hezekiah if we consider, 1. How much he lost of his country, Kg2 18:13. The king of Assyria took all or most of the fenced cities of Judah, the frontier-towns and the garrisons, and then all the rest fell into his hands of course. The confusion which the country was put into by this invasion is described by the prophet, Isa 10:28-31. 2. How dearly he paid for his peace. He saw Jerusalem itself in danger of falling into the enemies' hand, as Samaria had done, and was willing to purchase its safety at the expense, (1.) Of a mean submission: "I have offended in denying the usual tribute, and am ready to make satisfaction as shall be demanded," Kg2 18:14. Where was Hezekiah's courage? Where his confidence in God? Why did he not advise with Isaiah before he sent this crouching message? (2.) Of a vast sum of money - 300 talents of silver and thirty of gold (above 200,000l.), not to be paid annually, but as a present ransom. To raise this sum, he was forced not only to empty the public treasures (Kg2 18:15), but to take the golden plates off from the doors of the temple, and from the pillars, Kg2 18:16. Though the temple sanctified the gold which he had dedicated, yet, the necessity being urgent, he thought he might make as bold with that as his father David (whom he took for his pattern) did with the show-bread, and that it was neither impious nor imprudent to give a part for the preservation of the whole. His father Ahaz had plundered the temple in contempt of it, Ch2 28:24. He had repaid with interest what his father took; and now, with all due reverence, he only begged leave to borrow it again in an exigency and for a greater good, with a resolution to restore it in full as soon as he should be in a capacity to do so.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–16. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Against the Pelagians 2.21
Of Hezekiah it is written, “And he did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord, according to all that David his father had done. He destroyed the high places, and broke the statues in pieces, and burned the groves and broke the brazen serpent that Moses had made.” And again, “He trusted in the Lord the God of Israel, and after him there was none like him among all the kings of Judah who were before him. He stuck to the Lord, and departed not from him and kept his commandments, which the Lord commanded Moses, and the Lord was with him, and in all things to which he went forth, he behaved himself wisely.” And, when Sennacherib, the king of the Assyrians, had taken all the cities of Judah, “Hezekiah sent messengers to him, to Lachish, saying, ‘I have sinned, depart from me, and all that you shall command of me, I will give.’ And the king of the Assyrians put a tax on Hezekiah, king of Judah, of three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. And Hezekiah gave him all the money that was found in the house of the Lord and in the treasure houses of the king. At that time, he broke the doors of the temple of the Lord and the plates of gold and gave them all to the king of the Assyrians.” Although such great demands were placed on him, Hezekiah did not hesitate, in the face of stern necessity, to give the Assyrian king all that he had consecrated to the Lord, and it is said to him, “I will protect this city for my own sake and for David my servant’s sake.” Not for your sake, for you had already performed a noble deed when 185, soldiers of the Assyrian army were laid low and slaughtered by an angel.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 18:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.