TRV
Translation
King James Version
And the time that Jehu reigned over Israel in Samaria was twenty and eight years.
Berean Standard Bible
So the duration of Jehu’s reign over Israel in Samaria was twenty-eight years.
American Standard Version
And the time that Jehu reigned over Israel in Samaria was twenty and eight years.
World English Bible Messianic
The time that Jehu reigned over Israel in Samaria was twenty-eight years.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the time that Iehu reigned ouer Israel in Samaria is eight and twentie yeeres.
Young's Literal Translation
And the days that Jehu hath reigned over Israel are twenty and eight years, in Samaria.
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 9,830 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Kings 10 verses 29–36
29 ¶ Howbeit from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin, Jehu departed not from after them, to wit, the golden calves that were in Bethel, and that were in Dan.
30 And the LORD said unto Jehu, Because thou hast done well in executing that which is right in mine eyes, and hast done unto the house of Ahab according to all that was in mine heart, thy children of the fourth generation shall sit on the throne of Israel.
31 But Jehu took no heed to walk in the law of the LORD God of Israel with all his heart: for he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam, which made Israel to sin.
32 In those days the LORD began to cut Israel short: and Hazael smote them in all the coasts of Israel;
33 From Jordan eastward, all the land of Gilead, the Gadites, and the Reubenites, and the Manassites, from Aroer, which is by the river Arnon, even Gilead and Bashan.
34 Now the rest of the acts of Jehu, and all that he did, and all his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
35 And Jehu slept with his fathers: and they buried him in Samaria. And Jehoahaz his son reigned in his stead.
36 And the time that Jehu reigned over Israel in Samaria was twenty and eight years.
Here is all the account of the reign of Jehu, though it continued twenty-eight years. The progress of it answered not to the glory of its beginning. We have here,
I. God's approbation of what Jehu had done. Many, it is probable, censured him as treacherous and barbarous - called him a rebel, a usurper, a murderer, and prognosticated ill concerning him, that a family thus raised would soon be ruined; but God said, Well done (Kg2 10:30), and then it signified little who said otherwise. 1. God pronounced that to be right which he had done. It is justly questionable whether he did it from a good principle and whether he did not take some false steps in the doing of it; and yet (says God), Thou hast done well in executing that which is right in my eyes. The extirpating of idolaters and idolatry was a thing right in God's eyes, for it is an iniquity he visits as surely and severely as any: it was according to all that was in his heart, all he desired, all he designed. Jehu went through with his work. 2. God promised him a reward, that his children of the fourth generation from him should sit upon the throne of Israel. This was more than what took place in any of the dignities or royal families of that kingdom; of the house of Ahab there were indeed four kings, Omri, Ahab, Ahaziah, and Joram, but the last two were brothers, so that it reached but to the third generation, and that whole family continued but about forty-five years in all, whereas Jehu's continued in four, besides himself, and in all about 120 years. Note, No services done for God shall go unrewarded.
II. Jehu's carelessness in what he was further to do. By this it appeared that his heart was not right with God, that he was partial in his reformation. 1. He did not put away all the evil. He departed from the sins of Ahab, but not from the sins of Jeroboam - discarded Baal, but adhered to the calves. The worship of Baal was indeed the greater evil, and more heinous in the sight of God, but the worship of the calves was a great evil, and true conversion is not only from gross sin, but from all sin - not only from false gods, but from false worships. The worship of Baal weakened and diminished Israel, and made them beholden to the Sidonians, and therefore he could easily part with that; but the worship of the calves was a politic idolatry, was begun and kept up for reasons of state, to prevent the return of the ten tribes to the house of David, and therefore Jehu clave to that. True conversion is not only from wasteful sins, but from gainful sins - not only from those sins that are destructive to the secular interest, but from those that support and befriend it, in forsaking which is the great trial whether we can deny ourselves and trust God. 2. He put away evil, but he did not mind that which was good (Kg2 10:31): He took no heed to walk in the law of the Lord God of Israel. He abolished the worship of Baal, but did not keep up the worship of God, nor walk in his law. He had shown great care and zeal for the rooting out of a false religion; but in the true religion, (1.) He showed no care, took no heed, lived at large, was not at all solicitous to please God and to do his duty, took no heed to the scriptures, to the prophets, to his own conscience, but walked at all adventures. Those that are heedless, it is to be feared, are graceless; for, where there is a good principle in the heart, it will make men cautious and circumspect, desirous to please God and jealous of doing any thing to offend him. (2.) He showed no zeal; what he did in religion he did not do with his heart, with all his heart, but did it as if he did it not, without any liveliness or concern. It seems, he was a man that had little religion himself, and yet God made use of him as an instrument of reformation in Israel. It is a pity but that those that do good to others should always be good themselves.
III. The judgment that came upon Israel in his reign. We have reason to fear that when Jehu took no heed himself to walk in God's law the people were generally as careless as he, both in their devotions and in their conversations. There was a general decay of piety and increase of profaneness; and therefore it is not strange that the next news we hear is, In those days the Lord began to cut Israel short, Kg2 10:32. Their neighbours encroached upon them on every side; they were short in their duty to God, and therefore God cut them short in their extent, wealth, and power. Hazael king of Syria was, above any other, vexatious and mischievous to them, smote them in all the coasts of Israel, particularly the countries on the other side Jordan, which lay next him, and most exposed; on these he made continual inroads, and laid them waste. Now the Reubenites and Gadites smarted for the choice which their ancestors made of an inheritance on that side Jordan, which Moses reproved them for, Num. 32. Now Hazael did what Elisha foresaw and foretold he would do. Yet, for doing it, God had a quarrel with him and with his kingdom, as we may find, Amo 1:3, Amo 1:4. Because those of Damascus have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron, therefore (says God) I will send a fire into the house of Hazael, which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad.
Lastly, The conclusion of Jehu's reign, Kg2 10:34-36. Notice is taken, in general, of his might; but, because he took no heed to serve God, the memorials of his mighty enterprises and achievements are justly buried in oblivion.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 29–36. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Kings 10:36 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
The account of Jehu's reign over the Northern Kingdom of Israel concludes, stating its duration as twenty-eight years from his capital in Samaria. This concise regnal summary marks the end of a pivotal, albeit complex, period in Israel's history, characterized by a divinely mandated purge of Baal worship and the house of Ahab, yet simultaneously stained by Jehu's own failure to fully eradicate the idolatry introduced by Jeroboam. The verse serves as a chronological anchor, reflecting the Deuteronomistic Historian's pattern of evaluating kings based on their fidelity to the covenant, and subtly foreshadowing the continued spiritual decline of the Northern Kingdom despite moments of divine intervention.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several literary techniques characteristic of the Deuteronomistic History. The primary device is the Regnal Formula, a standardized concluding statement for each king's reign, typically including the king's name, the duration of his rule, and the city from which he reigned. This formula provides a consistent framework for the historical narrative, emphasizing the chronological progression of the monarchy. There is also an element of Juxtaposition in the broader narrative context surrounding this verse: Jehu's long reign (a sign of divine favor for his initial obedience) is juxtaposed with the immediate mention of God's judgment against Israel through Hazael due to Jehu's incomplete obedience (2 Kings 10:32-33). This contrast highlights the Deuteronomistic theme that even partial faithfulness has consequences. Furthermore, the longevity of Jehu's reign, while a blessing, also serves as a subtle Foreshadowing of the continued spiritual decline of the Northern Kingdom, as the problem of idolatry (the golden calves) persisted beyond Jehu's purge of Baal, ultimately leading to Israel's downfall.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The conclusion of Jehu's reign in 2 Kings 10:36 encapsulates a profound theological truth about God's dealings with His people: His unwavering commitment to justice and His patient, yet firm, response to human obedience and disobedience. Jehu was God's chosen instrument for a specific purpose—the eradication of the heinous Baal worship and the corrupt house of Ahab. God honored Jehu's zeal by granting him a long reign and a dynastic promise. However, Jehu's failure to fully commit to Yahweh, particularly his retention of Jeroboam's golden calves, demonstrates that partial obedience is still disobedience in God's eyes, and it carries severe consequences for both the individual and the nation. This narrative underscores that God's standards are absolute, and while He uses imperfect people, He still holds them accountable for their choices. It also highlights the persistent struggle in Israel between true worship and syncretism, a struggle that ultimately led to their exile.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Jehu's twenty-eight-year reign, summarized in this verse, offers a potent lesson for believers today: God's call to obedience is comprehensive, not selective. While Jehu was zealous in fulfilling the dramatic, visible aspects of his divine commission—purging Baal and the house of Ahab—he faltered in the more subtle, yet equally crucial, area of removing the long-standing idolatry of the golden calves. This illustrates the danger of "partial obedience," where we might enthusiastically tackle certain sins or ministries while neglecting others that are less convenient, less visible, or more deeply ingrained. Jehu's story reminds us that God desires wholehearted devotion, not just outward conformity or selective zeal. Our faithfulness is not measured by what we eliminate, but by what we fully embrace and live out—a complete turning away from all forms of idolatry and a steadfast commitment to God's revealed will in every area of life. The consequences of Jehu's partiality, leading to national oppression, serve as a sober warning that even seemingly minor compromises can have far-reaching negative effects on our spiritual lives and communities.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Jehu's reign so long compared to other Northern Kingdom kings?
Answer: Jehu's reign of twenty-eight years was indeed remarkably long for a king of the Northern Kingdom, especially given that he came to power through a violent coup. This longevity is explicitly explained as a direct fulfillment of God's promise to Jehu in 2 Kings 10:30: "Because you have done well in executing what is right in My eyes, and have done to the house of Ahab all that was in My heart, your sons of the fourth generation shall sit on the throne of Israel." This was a divine reward for his zeal in eradicating the idolatrous house of Ahab and the worship of Baal, which was a significant act of obedience to God's command. Many other Northern Kingdom kings had much shorter, unstable reigns due to assassinations and coups, making Jehu's long tenure a testament to God's faithfulness to His word, even to an imperfect instrument.
Did Jehu truly serve God, given his violent methods and partial obedience?
Answer: The biblical narrative presents a complex picture of Jehu. On one hand, his actions in destroying the house of Ahab and purging Baal worship were explicitly commanded and endorsed by God (2 Kings 9:7-10; 2 Kings 10:30). He was a divinely appointed instrument of judgment. On the other hand, the text is clear that Jehu did not fully turn to the Lord. He continued the sin of Jeroboam I by maintaining the golden calves at Bethel and Dan (2 Kings 10:29), indicating a pragmatic, rather than a wholehearted, commitment to Yahweh. His methods were ruthless, but in the context of ancient Near Eastern warfare and divine judgment against extreme wickedness, they were considered appropriate for the task. Thus, Jehu served God in a specific, limited capacity, fulfilling a critical part of God's judgment, but his personal faith and obedience were ultimately incomplete.
What was the significance of Samaria as his capital?
Answer: Samaria was the established capital city of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, founded by King Omri (1 Kings 16:24) decades before Jehu's reign. Its significance lies in its strategic location and its role as the political, economic, and often religious center of the northern tribes. By reigning "in Samaria," Jehu solidified his control over the heartland of Israel, demonstrating continuity with the previous Omride dynasty's administrative structure, even as he violently purged their lineage. Samaria represented the distinct identity and often the spiritual failings of the Northern Kingdom, setting it apart from Jerusalem, the capital of Judah and the divinely appointed center of worship.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The twenty-eight-year reign of Jehu, concluded in 2 Kings 10:36, serves as a poignant reminder of the limitations of earthly kings and the profound need for a perfect, eternal King. Jehu, despite being divinely appointed and achieving a significant, albeit partial, purge of idolatry, ultimately failed to bring true and lasting spiritual transformation to Israel. His reign, like all human reigns, was temporary, and his obedience was incomplete (2 Kings 10:29). This partiality and the subsequent decline of the Northern Kingdom underscore the inability of any human ruler to perfectly fulfill God's will or to fully redeem His people from the pervasive power of sin and idolatry. This narrative points forward to Jesus Christ, the true and ultimate King. Unlike Jehu, who only partially cleansed Israel, Jesus perfectly fulfills all righteousness (Matthew 3:15) and completely eradicates sin through His atoning sacrifice, becoming the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. His reign is not limited to a specific number of years or a geographical capital like Samaria, but is an eternal kingdom that will have no end (Revelation 11:15). Where Jehu's zeal was mixed with human ambition and compromise, Christ's obedience was perfect and His mission was fully accomplished on the cross (John 19:30). Thus, Jehu's temporary and flawed rule ultimately highlights the glorious and everlasting reign of Christ, who alone brings complete spiritual liberation and establishes a kingdom of perfect righteousness.