TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Chronicles 16 verses 7–14
Here is, I. A plain and faithful reproof given to Asa by a prophet of the Lord, for making this league with Baasha. The reprover was Hanani the seer, the father of Jehu, another prophet, whom we read of Kg1 16:1; Ch2 19:2. We observed several things amiss in Asa's treaty with Benhadad. But that which the prophet here charges upon him as the greatest fault he was guilty of in that matter is his relying on the king of Syria and not on the Lord his God, Ch2 16:7. He thought that, though God was on his side, this would not stand him in stead unless he had Benhadad on his side, that God either could not or would not help him, but he must take this indirect course to help himself. Note, God is much displeased when he is distrusted and when an arm of flesh is relied on more than his power and goodness. By putting our confidence in God we give honour to him, and therefore he thinks himself affronted if we give that honour to another. He plainly tells the king that herein he had done foolishly, Ch2 16:9. It is a foolish thing to lean on a broken reed, when we have the rock of ages to rely upon. To convince him of his folly he shows him,
1.That he acted against his experience, Ch2 16:8. He, of all men, had no reason to distrust God, who had found him such a present powerful helper, by whom he had been made to triumph over a threatening enemy, as his father before him, because he relied upon the Lord his God, Ch2 13:18; Ch2 14:11. "What!" said the prophet, "Were not the Ethiopians and the Lubim a huge host, enough to swallow up a kingdom? And yet, because thou didst rely on the Lord, he delivered them into thy hand; and was not he sufficient to help thee against Baasha?" Note, The many experiences we have had of the goodness of God to us aggravate our distrust of him. Has he not helped us in six troubles? And have we any reason to suspect him in the seventh? But see how deceitful our hearts are! We trust in God when we have nothing else to trust to, when need drives us to him; but, when we have other things to stay on, we are apt to stay too much on them and to lean on our own understanding as long as that has any thing to offer; but a believing confidence will be in God only, when a smiling world courts it most.
2.That he acted against his knowledge of God and his providence, Ch2 16:9. Asa could not be ignorant that the eyes of the Lord run to and fro through the earth, strongly to hold with those (so it may be read) whose heart is perfect towards him; that is, (1.) That God governs the world in infinite wisdom, and the creatures, and all their actions, are continually under his eye. The eye of Providence is quick-sighted - it runs; it is intent - it runs to and fro; it reaches far - through the whole earth, no corner of which is from under it, not the most dark or distant; and his eye directs his hand, and the arm of his power; for he shows himself strong. Does Satan walk to and fro in the earth? Providence runs to and fro, is never out of the way, never to seek, never at a loss. (2.) That God governs the world for the good of his people, does all in pursuance of the counsels of his love concerning their salvation, all for Jacob his servant's sake, and Israel his elect, Isa 45:4. Christ is head over all things to his church, Eph 1:22. (3.) That those whose hearts are upright with him may be sure of his protection and have all the reason in the world to depend upon it. He is able to protect them in the way of their duty (for wisdom and might are his), and he actually intends their protection. A practical disbelief of this is at the bottom of all our departures from God and double-dealing with him. Asa could not trust God and therefore made court to Benhadad.
3.That he acted against his interest. (1.) He had lost an opportunity of checking the growing greatness of the king of Syria, (Ch2 16:7): His host has escaped out of thy hand, which otherwise would have joined with Baasha's and fallen with it. (2.) He had incurred God's displeasure and henceforth must expect no peace, but the constant alarms of war, Ch2 16:9. Those that cannot find in their hearts to trust God forfeit his protection and throw themselves out of it.
II. Asa's displeasure at this reproof. Though it came from God by one that was known to be his messenger, though the reproof was just and the reasoning fair, and all intended for his good, yet he was wroth with the seer for telling him of his folly; nay, he was in a rage with him, Ch2 16:10. Is this Asa? Is this he whose heart was perfect with the Lord all his days? Well, let him that thinks he stands take heed lest he fall. A wise man, and yet in a rage! An Israelite, and yet in a rage with a prophet! A good man, and yet impatient of reproof, and that cannot bear to be told of his faults! Lord, what is man, when God leaves him to himself? Those that idolize their own conduct cannot bear contradiction; and those that indulge a peevish passionate temper may be transported by it into impieties as well as into indecencies, and will, some time or other, fly in the face of God himself. See what gall and wormwood this root of bitterness bore. 1. In his rage he committed the prophet to the jail, put him in a prison-house, as a malefactor, in the stocks (so some read it,) or into little-ease. God's prophets meet with many that cannot bear reproof, but take it much amiss, yet they must do their duty. 2. Having proceeded thus far, he oppressed some of the people, probably such as owned the prophet in his sufferings, or were known to be his particular friends. He that abused his power for the persecuting of God's prophet was left to himself further to abuse it for the crushing of his own subjects, whereby he weakened himself and lost his interest. Most persecutors have been tyrants.
III. His sickness. Two years before he died he was diseased in his feet (Ch2 16:12), afflicted with the gout in a high degree. He had put the prophet in the stocks, and now God put him in the stocks; so his punishment answered his sin. His disease was exceedingly great; it came to the height (so some); it flew up to his head (so others), and then it was mortal. This was his affliction; but his sin was that in his disease, instead of seeking to the Lord for relief, he sought to the physicians. His making use of physicians was his duty; but trusting to them, and expecting that from them which was to be had from God only, were his sin and folly. The help of creatures must always be used with an eye to the Creator, and in dependence upon him, who makes every creature that to us which it is, and without whom the most skilful and faithful are physicians of no value. Some think that these physicians were strangers to the commonwealth of Israel, and were a sort of conjurers, to whom he applied as if there were not a God in Israel.
IV. His death and burial. His funeral had something of extraordinary solemnity in it, Ch2 16:14. They made a very magnificent burying for him. I am loth to think (as some do) that he himself ordered this funeral pomp, and that it was an instance of his vanity, that he would be buried like the Gentiles, and not after the way of the Jews. It is said indeed, He digged the sepulchre for himself, as one mindful of his grave; but I am willing to believe that this funeral pomp was rather an expression of the great respect his people retained for him, notwithstanding the failings and infirmities of his latter days. It was agreed to do him honour at his death. Note, The eminent piety and usefulness of good men ought to be remembered to their praise, though they have had their blemishes. Let their faults be buried in their graves, while their services are remembered over their graves. He that said, There is not a just man that doeth good and sinneth not, yet said also, The memory of the just is blessed; and let it be so.
Continue studying 2 Chronicles 16:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
2 Chronicles 16:13 succinctly records the death of King Asa of Judah, bringing a definitive close to his forty-one-year reign. This verse serves as a sober capstone to a life that began with fervent devotion and significant reforms but tragically ended in a concerning decline of trust in God, evidenced by his reliance on human alliances and physicians rather than divine aid, and his harsh treatment of those who dared to rebuke him. The Chronicler presents Asa's death not merely as a historical fact but as the final, somber note in a narrative emphasizing the critical importance of sustained faithfulness and unwavering dependence on the Lord throughout one's entire life.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: 2 Chronicles 16:13 concludes the Chronicler's detailed account of King Asa's reign, immediately following a poignant description of his spiritual decline. The preceding verses (2 Chronicles 16:1-12) meticulously highlight a pivotal and regrettable shift in Asa's character. After an initial period of exemplary faithfulness and profound reliance on God, powerfully demonstrated in his miraculous victory over Zerah the Ethiopian (see 2 Chronicles 14:9-15), Asa falters significantly. When confronted with a threat from King Baasha of Israel, he chooses to forge a political alliance with Ben-Hadad of Syria, even resorting to using temple treasures to secure aid, rather than seeking the Lord's intervention (see 2 Chronicles 16:1-6). This decision draws a severe rebuke from the prophet Hanani, whom Asa, in a fit of anger and pride, imprisons (see 2 Chronicles 16:7-10). The narrative further notes Asa's severe disease in his feet and his exclusive reliance on physicians, explicitly stating that he "did not seek the Lord" (see 2 Chronicles 16:12). Thus, verse 13 serves as the narrative's stark conclusion to this downward trajectory, setting the stage for the succession of his son, Jehoshaphat, who would largely reverse this trend.
Historical & Cultural Context: King Asa ruled the Southern Kingdom of Judah for an impressive 41 years, a relatively long reign for a monarch in the ancient Near East, generally indicating a period of considerable stability for the kingdom. The phrase "slept with his fathers" is a deeply ingrained biblical euphemism for death, particularly for kings and patriarchs, signifying their peaceful passing and their joining of ancestors in the grave. This idiom does not inherently convey a specific theological statement about the afterlife but rather a cultural recognition of lineage, continuity, and the natural cycle of life and death. Kings were typically interred in royal tombs, often within the "City of David," a practice that underscored their connection to the esteemed Davidic dynasty and the historical continuity of the monarchy. Geopolitically, Judah faced ongoing tensions with the Northern Kingdom of Israel (the divided kingdom), as well as interactions with powerful regional entities like Syria (Aram) to the north and Ethiopia (Cush) to the south. The Chronicler, writing centuries after these events for a post-exilic community, often reinterprets or emphasizes aspects of the monarchical history to teach profound theological lessons, particularly concerning the paramount importance of covenant fidelity, temple worship, and unwavering trust in Yahweh.
Key Themes: Asa's story, culminating in his death in 2 Chronicles 16:13, powerfully illustrates several key themes central to the Chronicler's overarching theological perspective. Foremost is the theme of Divine Retribution and Blessing, where consistent faithfulness to God leads to prosperity, victory, and divine favor, while disobedience, pride, and a lack of trust result in negative consequences, even for a divinely appointed king. Asa's early reign exemplifies the former, marked by zealous reforms and a miraculous victory (see 2 Chronicles 14:2-5 and 2 Chronicles 14:11). His latter years, however, starkly demonstrate the latter. This narrative also highlights the crucial theme of Sustained Faithfulness, emphasizing that a strong and promising spiritual beginning does not guarantee a strong and faithful finish. Asa's life serves as a cautionary tale, underscoring the continuous need for humility, a willingness to repent, and unwavering reliance on God throughout one's entire life. Finally, the verse implicitly points to Divine Sovereignty over human life and death, reminding readers that even the longest and most powerful reigns ultimately conclude under God's appointed timing and divine decree.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The Chronicler employs several literary devices in 2 Chronicles 16:13 to convey both historical fact and profound theological meaning. The most prominent is Euphemism, specifically the phrase "slept with his fathers," which is a gentle, respectful, and common way of referring to death without using a harsh or direct term. This device is frequently used in biblical narratives concerning the demise of significant figures, especially kings, linking them to their ancestral lineage and emphasizing a peaceful transition. The verse also utilizes a precise Chronological Marker by explicitly stating "in the one and fortieth year of his reign," providing exact historical context and emphasizing the substantial length of Asa's rule. This temporal specificity allows the reader to place Asa's entire narrative—his initial faithfulness, his reforms, his victories, and his later spiritual decline—within a defined and measurable period. Finally, there is an implicit Juxtaposition at play. Coming at the very end of a chapter that meticulously details Asa's spiritual failures (his reliance on a pagan alliance, his anger at the prophet Hanani, and his exclusive reliance on physicians rather than God), this simple declaration of death stands in stark contrast to the earlier descriptions of his zealous and God-fearing reign. The brevity of the verse, following a detailed account of his decline, underscores the tragic culmination of a life that began strong but did not finish well, serving as a subtle yet powerful theological commentary on the consequences of wavering faith.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The death of King Asa in 2 Chronicles 16:13, especially when read in light of the preceding narrative of his spiritual decline, serves as a profound theological statement on the nature of covenant faithfulness and its consequences within the Chronicler's framework. The Chronicler meticulously details Asa's initial devotion, his radical reforms, and God's subsequent blessings, contrasting them sharply with his later pride, lack of trust, and oppressive behavior towards those who challenged him. This verse, therefore, is not merely a record of a king's passing but a poignant reminder that a life of faith requires sustained reliance on God, from beginning to end. It underscores the biblical principle that while God is merciful and long-suffering, He also holds His people, particularly those in leadership, accountable for their choices. Even a long and initially righteous reign can be marred by a departure from divine wisdom and unwavering trust. Asa's story is a testament to the fact that spiritual vigilance is a lifelong endeavor, and that turning away from God, even in subtle ways, can have significant and regrettable consequences for both the individual and the community.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
King Asa's final days and death offer a sobering yet vital lesson for believers today: the imperative of finishing well in our spiritual journey. While his early reign was marked by commendable zeal for God and a clear demonstration of faith in the face of overwhelming odds, his later years reveal a tragic shift towards self-reliance, anger, and a hardening of heart. This narrative challenges us to consider not just the strength of our spiritual beginnings, but the consistency, depth, and perseverance of our faith throughout every season of life. It calls us to cultivate a posture of humility, openness to correction, and unwavering dependence on God, even when facing illness, adversity, or the temptation to rely on human wisdom or resources alone. Asa's story reminds us that true spiritual maturity is characterized by a continuous seeking of the Lord, a willingness to repent when we stray, and a steadfast trust in His sovereignty and provision, regardless of our circumstances. Our walk with God is a marathon, not a sprint, requiring persistent faithfulness and a heart continually fixed on Him until the very end.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does the phrase "slept with his fathers" mean in a biblical context?
Answer: The phrase "slept with his fathers" is a common biblical euphemism for death, particularly used for kings and patriarchs. It signifies a peaceful passing and the deceased being gathered to their ancestors in the afterlife or, more concretely, being buried in the family or royal tomb alongside previous generations. It emphasizes the continuity of lineage and the natural cycle of life and death, rather than providing specific theological details about the state of the dead. For a king like Asa, it also implies his integration into the historical and dynastic line of rulers, connecting him to the legacy of his predecessors.
Is Asa's death presented as a judgment for his later unfaithfulness?
Answer: While the verse itself simply states Asa's death, the Chronicler's preceding narrative strongly implies a connection between Asa's spiritual decline and the circumstances surrounding his end. The text highlights his failure to seek the Lord in battle against Baasha, his anger and imprisonment of the prophet Hanani for rebuke, and his exclusive reliance on physicians rather than God during his illness (see 2 Chronicles 16:12). The Chronicler's theological agenda often links obedience to blessing and disobedience to negative consequences. Therefore, while not explicitly stated as a direct judgment, Asa's death concludes a narrative arc that showcases the regrettable outcomes of a king who began well but faltered in his trust and obedience to God, serving as a cautionary tale.
What is the most significant lesson we can learn from King Asa's reign and death?
Answer: The most significant lesson from King Asa's reign and death is the critical importance of sustained faithfulness and perseverance in one's walk with God. Asa's story powerfully illustrates that a strong beginning in faith does not guarantee a strong finish. His early devotion, religious reforms, and reliance on God brought great blessing and victory. However, his later pride, self-reliance, and refusal to accept prophetic correction led to a decline in his spiritual life and a less-than-ideal end to his long reign. This narrative serves as a timeless reminder for all believers to remain humble, continually seek the Lord, and maintain a steadfast trust in Him throughout all seasons and challenges of life, ensuring that our faith endures to the very end (see Hebrews 10:36 and Philippians 1:6).
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The account of King Asa's death, following a reign marked by both commendable faithfulness and lamentable spiritual decline, powerfully foreshadows the need for a perfect King whose reign and life would be utterly without blemish. Asa, like all earthly kings, "slept with his fathers" and died, demonstrating the universal dominion of death over humanity, a direct consequence of sin (see Romans 5:12). His failure to maintain consistent trust in God, particularly in his later years and during his illness, highlights the inherent limitations and imperfections of even the best human leaders. In stark contrast, Jesus Christ is the King who never falters, whose trust in the Father was absolute, even unto the cross (see Philippians 2:8). Unlike Asa, who succumbed to disease and death, Christ willingly laid down His life and, through His resurrection, conquered death itself, rising victorious to an eternal reign (see Revelation 1:18). His perfect obedience, unwavering faith, and ultimate triumph over sin and death provide the fulfillment that Asa's imperfect reign could only hint at. In Christ, we find the perfect King who truly heals, provides, and reigns eternally, offering not just a temporary reprieve but everlasting life and perfect communion with God, a reality far surpassing any earthly kingdom or monarch (see Hebrews 7:23-25).