TRV
Translation
King James Version
For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing.
Complete Jewish Bible
For if God has in fact willed that you should suffer, it is better that you suffer for doing what is good than for doing what is evil.
Berean Standard Bible
For it is better, if it is God’s will, to suffer for doing good than for doing evil.
American Standard Version
For it is better, if the will of God should so will, that ye suffer for well-doing than for evil-doing.
World English Bible Messianic
For it is better, if it is God’s will, that you suffer for doing well than for doing evil.
Geneva Bible (1599)
For it is better (if the will of God be so) that ye suffer for well doing, then for euil doing.
Young's Literal Translation
for it is better doing good, if the will of God will it, to suffer, than doing evil;
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 30,442 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Peter 3 verses 16–17
16 ¶ Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.
17 For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing.
The confession of a Christian's faith cannot credibly be supported but by the two means here specified - a good conscience and a good conversation. conscience is good when it does its office well, when it is kept pure and uncorrupt, and clear from guilt; then it will justify you, though men accuse you. A good conversation in Christ is a holy life, according to the doctrine and example of Christ. "Look well to your conscience, and to your conversation; and then, though men speak evil of you, and falsely accuse you as evil-doers, you will clear yourselves, and bring them to shame. Perhaps you may think it hard to suffer for well-doing, for keeping a good conscience and a good conversation; but be not discouraged, for it is better for you, though worse for your enemies, that you suffer for well-doing than for evil-doing." Learn, 1. The most conscientious persons cannot escape the censures and slanders of evil men; they will speak evil of them, as of evil-doers, and charge them with crimes which their very souls abhor: Christ and his apostles were so used. 2. A good conscience and a good conversation are the best means to secure a good name; these give a solid reputation and a lasting one. 3. False accusation generally turns to the accuser's shame, by discovering at last the accuser's indiscretion, injustice, falsehood, and uncharitableness. 4. It is sometimes the will of God that good people should suffer for well-doing, for their honesty and for their faith. 5. As well-doing sometimes exposes a good man to suffering, so evil-doing will not exempt an evil man from it. The apostle supposes here that a man may suffer for both. If the sufferings of good people for well-doing be so severe, what will the sufferings of wicked people be for evil-doing? It is a sad condition which that person is in upon whom sin and suffering meet together at the same time; sin makes sufferings to be extreme, unprofitable, comfortless, and destructive.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Augustine of HippoAD 430
ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE 1.40
Everyone who lies acts unjustly, and if lying ever seems to be useful to someone, it may be that injustice sometimes seems useful to him. But in fact injustice is never useful, and lying always does harm.
Andreas of CaesareaAD 614
CATENA
Once again, Peter exhorts us not to grieve over unjust suffering, if that is God’s will for us. He teaches us that we suffer for the specific purpose of being trained for what we are meant to be according to the mercy of God.
BedeAD 735
Commentary on the Catholic Epistles
For it is better, if it is God's will, to suffer for doing good than for doing evil. This statement elegantly refutes the foolishness of those who, when they are accused by their brothers for faults or even restrained by punishments, endure it completely patiently; but when they suffer insults, losses of property, or any adversities from others without fault, they immediately burst into anger, and those who previously seemed innocent, through impatience and murmuring, render themselves guilty. So that the difference in the scourging appears vastly different in unequal merits, let us see that Tobias, Saul, and Elymas were struck by the same affliction of blindness. But Tobias was struck in order that the virtue of his patience might shine more widely as an example to all; Saul so that he might be transformed from Saul the persecutor into Paul the apostle; and Elymas so that, suffering the fitting punishment for his treachery, he would cease to lead astray those who were about to believe. And if I were given a choice, I would rather, with such a Father, be subjected to just scourging, divine or human, than be dragged to the pursuit of justice by the force of unjust blows. Again, I would rather be pulled back from faults by a scourge than be subjected to eternal punishment for the insurmountable weight of sins.
OecumeniusAD 990
Commentary on 1 Peter
For it is better to suffer for doing good, if that should be God's will, than for doing evil: for Christ also died once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death indeed in the flesh but made alive in the spirit.
This is the explanation of the cause not relating to what has been said immediately, but to what was mentioned a little earlier, for example: “if you should suffer for righteousness' sake, you are blessed” (1 Peter 3:14); [now Peter says] for it is better to suffer for doing good than for doing evil. Or if someone wants to refer to the immediately preceding explanation of the cause: what is said about doing good should not be understood as pertaining to someone else doing good, but absolutely, that is, as doing good works. Similarly, it applies to those doing evil.
Peter also adds: "if that should be God's will," indicating that nothing happens to us without God's will, but either for the easing of sins, or for our praise and glory, or even for the salvation of others. This happens in two ways. Either a righteous person is afflicted for the correction of others' sins, as it has been said: If the righteous is scarcely saved, where will the ungodly appear? (1 Peter 4:18; See Proverbs 11:31 LXX) And this also presents twofold usefulness: for the just one who is afflicted, an increase in righteousness due to patience; for the sinner who observes, conversion, as we have said.
Therefore, the just man suffers for these reasons: either for the salvation of others, as Christ did. And for this reason, Peter now adds the example of Christ: for Christ died not for His own sins, but for ours.
Therefore, Peter also adds: righteous for the unrighteous. For He, as previously shown through the prophet, had not committed sin. However, showing the effectiveness and power of Him who suffered, he adds: once. So great, he says, was the strength of Him who suffered for men, that although He offended many of their sins, the single passion of the Lord was sufficient to overcome all the power of our sins. Therefore, since Christ suffered to bring us to God and His Father, it is shown that not all who suffer do so because of sins. And because Christ is considered in a twofold manner, namely God and man, He also bestowed upon us a double grace. For He died as a man, freeing us from death and corruption, renewing for us the resurrection, and giving by His example, that those dying from this time should not face death without the hope of resurrection.
But made alive, that is, rising from the dead by the power of divinity (for He rose from the dead not as a man, but as God), He simultaneously restored to life all who were in Hades, raising them up together with Himself. Indeed, many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised, according to the holy evangelist, and were seen by many. (Matt. 27:52) But when Peter has proceeded thus far in his discourse and has shown these things, he then proposes how the dead benefited those who had previously slept. At the same time, with much questioning, if the incarnation of the Lord occurred for the salvation of all men, what kind of salvation did those who had died before receive? He resolves both in one way and says that the death of the Lord accomplished both, namely the hope of action through the fact that he himself has risen, and again the salvation of those who had previously slept. For those who had adorned their lives with good works during the time they lived, just as if Christ had come at that time they would not have been deprived of the preaching that gives life to them, so also at that time through the Lord's descent to Hades they obtained salvation, as it also seems to the divine Gregory4. For he himself says: “Does Christ who appeared, namely in Hades, save all simply? Or does he also save those who believed there? For by saying: Those who believed, he signifies that they had prepared themselves in such a way that if he had come even then, they would have believed.” Nor do I think this should be rejected. Salvation is not held by inheritance, since although it comes to all the living, it does not save all, but only those who believe. Indeed, it was also the work of the free will of individuals, that since they were rational, they would not behave insensibly towards the magnificence of him who had granted such a gift, but would present themselves as worthy of the goodness of the giver. However, he stated, They had been disobedient, thereby resolving a certain objection. For it was likely that someone would say: And what else before Christ was preached, afterwards were they judged or deemed worthy of condemnation who preceded Christ? And since he could demonstrate this, just as Paul did, from the rational powers dispersed among us, which, when given to them, allowed them to discern between good and evil, and yet they did not act according to good afterwards, such were worthy of death; this does not, however, make it so, for that is of a higher consideration and a deeper philosophy than the mind of the Jews could bear: but it confirms disobedience from Scripture; nor is this from the times of the prophets, but almost from the very beginning of the world: from which he demonstrates that salvation was preached to men from the beginning, but was despised due to their inclination towards vain and sensual pleasures.
For even in their time, although there were countless wicked men, only eight, who believed what was proclaimed through the preparation of the ark, were saved (1 Peter 3:20). And because salvation was through water, he immediately applies this to the sacred baptism, and says that that water prefigured our baptism, since it also drowns and submerges unbelieving demons and saves the faithful who come to the ark of the Church. At the same time, he says: Just as water washes away filth, so does baptism. But it does not effect the removal of bodily dirt, rather, through a symbol, it demonstrates the washing away of the stains of the soul. It is, moreover, as it were, a pledge and guarantee of a good conscience toward God. For those who are well aware of themselves, that is, who embrace a blameless life and earnestly seek and, as it were, inquire after it (for those who seek something are accustomed to inquire), these also hasten to the sacred baptism. And who, he says, provides that divine baptism should be sought and requested? The resurrection of Christ. For before His resurrection and passion it is shown: “Unless one is born of water and the Spirit;” (Jn. 3:5) but after the resurrection: “Baptizing all nations who come, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” (Matt. 28:19-20) After he concluded the discourse on the dispensation, I speak now of the descent of the Lord into Hades, and for what reason he also went there—namely, that it was for the salvation of those who were in Hades as well. He again takes another occasion from the death of the Lord to exhort to virtue, and says:
If Christ died in the flesh for us (for he could not die in his immortal and divine nature), then surely you also, repaying him in turn, by dying to sin for his sake, will no longer be captivated by human desires, but will live for the rest of your time in the flesh only for the will of God.
“put to death indeed in the flesh” —that is, by the nature of the flesh, that is, the human nature, but rising by the power of divinity. For God is spirit (Jn. 4:24), just as He Himself, the source and wisdom of theology, has taught us.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Peter 3:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
First Peter 3:17 offers profound encouragement and theological insight for believers facing adversity, asserting that it is far more honorable, purposeful, and spiritually beneficial to endure suffering as a consequence of living righteously, in alignment with God's sovereign will, than to suffer due to one's own wrongdoing. This verse serves as a crucial distinction for Christians navigating a world often hostile to their faith, providing a framework for understanding the nature and redemptive potential of hardship when embraced with a good conscience.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within Peter's extended exhortation to Christian conduct in the face of suffering, which begins in 1 Peter 2:11. Having urged submission to governing authorities, masters, and husbands in the preceding verses (1 Peter 2:13-25 and 1 Peter 3:1-7), Peter transitions to a general call for unity, compassion, and humility among believers (1 Peter 3:8-9). He then directly addresses the reality of suffering for righteousness, assuring believers that even if they suffer for doing good, they are blessed (1 Peter 3:13-14). The immediate preceding verse, 1 Peter 3:16, emphasizes the importance of maintaining a good conscience so that those who malign Christian conduct will be put to shame. Therefore, 1 Peter 3:17 acts as a summary principle, reinforcing that suffering, when it occurs, should be a result of righteous living, not sinful actions, thereby aligning with the pattern of Christ's own blameless suffering (1 Peter 2:21-24).
Historical & Cultural Context: Peter's audience comprised scattered Christians in various Roman provinces of Asia Minor (1 Peter 1:1). These early believers lived as a minority in a predominantly pagan society, often facing social ostracism, slander, and potential persecution for their refusal to participate in imperial cults or local pagan customs. Their distinct ethical lifestyle, characterized by moral purity and devotion to Christ, frequently invited misunderstanding and hostility. The Roman authorities, while generally tolerant of diverse religions, viewed Christians with suspicion due to their perceived "atheism" (for not worshipping Roman gods) and their exclusive allegiance to Christ. Peter's letter, therefore, provided crucial pastoral guidance on how to live honorably and maintain a clear conscience in such an environment, emphasizing that their suffering, if it came, should be a testament to their faith and not a consequence of criminal behavior (1 Peter 4:15-16).
Key Themes: The overarching theme of 1 Peter is Christian endurance and hope in the face of suffering. 1 Peter 3:17 contributes significantly to several key themes. Firstly, it highlights the distinction between suffering for righteousness and suffering for wrongdoing, emphasizing that only the former brings honor and divine approval. Secondly, the phrase "if the will of God be so" underscores the theme of divine sovereignty in suffering, suggesting that even hardship can be part of God's purposeful plan for a believer's sanctification, witness, or ultimate glory. This perspective transforms seemingly meaningless pain into a potentially redemptive experience. Thirdly, the verse reinforces the importance of Christian conduct as a powerful witness, arguing that suffering for "well doing" validates one's faith and can shame accusers (1 Peter 3:16). Finally, it implicitly connects to the theme of imitating Christ, who Himself suffered innocently and righteously, providing the ultimate model for believers (1 Peter 2:21).
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse primarily employs Contrast, setting "well doing" against "evil doing" as the cause of suffering. This antithesis highlights the moral and spiritual distinction between two types of hardship, guiding believers on how to interpret and endure their trials. The phrase "if the will of God be so" functions as a Conditional Clause, introducing a nuance of divine sovereignty and purpose into the discussion of suffering. It suggests that while suffering itself may not always be God's direct desire, suffering for righteousness can indeed align with His broader redemptive plan. Furthermore, the use of "better" (G2909, kreíttōn) can be seen as a form of Understatement or Litotes, implying a profound superiority rather than a mere preference. It's not just "better" but fundamentally more noble, more blessed, and more aligned with the divine order. Peter's overall tone is Didactic and Exhortative, providing clear instruction and encouragement to his audience facing real-world challenges.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
First Peter 3:17 stands as a cornerstone for understanding the Christian perspective on suffering. It elevates suffering from a mere unfortunate circumstance to a potential arena for divine purpose and spiritual growth. Theologically, it underscores God's sovereignty, even over the hardships faced by His children, suggesting that righteous suffering is not outside His will but can be woven into His redemptive plan. It distinguishes between punitive suffering for sin, which is justly deserved, and redemptive suffering for righteousness, which aligns the believer with Christ's own experience and serves as a powerful witness. This verse calls believers to a radical self-examination, urging them to ensure that any tribulation they face is a consequence of their faithfulness, not their folly, thereby preserving their conscience and glorifying God.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This verse offers profound guidance for navigating life's inevitable difficulties. It compels us to a critical self-assessment: when we experience hardship, we are first called to examine its source. Is our suffering a consequence of our own sin, poor choices, or disobedience to God's commands? If so, the path forward is repentance and seeking God's forgiveness and restoration. However, if our suffering arises from our commitment to Christ, our pursuit of righteousness, or our stand for biblical truth in a hostile world, then this verse transforms our perspective. It assures us that such suffering, while painful, is not meaningless but can be part of God's sovereign will, serving to refine our character, deepen our faith, and provide a powerful testimony to unbelievers. Embracing this perspective allows us to find purpose in our pain, knowing that our "well doing" is seen and honored by God, even when it is reviled by the world. It encourages us to persevere in doing good, regardless of the cost, finding strength and comfort in the knowledge that our trials, when endured for Christ's sake, are ultimately "better."
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Does God actively want us to suffer for "well doing"?
Answer: The phrase "if the will of God be so" (G1487, ei + G2307, thélēma) indicates that suffering for righteousness is not necessarily God's primary desire for every believer at all times, but rather that such suffering can indeed fall within His sovereign and permissible will. It suggests that God may allow or even ordain such suffering for higher purposes, such as purifying faith, strengthening character, or providing a powerful witness to the world. It is not suffering for suffering's sake, but suffering with a redemptive purpose, aligning with the pattern of Christ's own innocent suffering as seen in 1 Peter 2:21.
What exactly constitutes "well doing" in the context of this verse?
Answer: "Well doing" (G15, agathopoiéō) refers to actively living out Christian virtues and obeying God's commands. This includes, but is not limited to, maintaining a good conscience (1 Peter 3:16), showing respect to authorities (1 Peter 2:13-17), living honorably among unbelievers (1 Peter 2:12), and being ready to give a defense for one's hope with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15). It encompasses a life characterized by moral excellence, love, and faithfulness to Christ, even when such a life invites opposition from a world hostile to God's ways.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
First Peter 3:17 finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. He is the preeminent example of one who suffered for "well doing," indeed, for perfect doing. Unlike humanity, who suffer for their own "evil doing" (Romans 6:23), Christ "committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth" (1 Peter 2:22). His suffering, culminating in the cross, was entirely for righteousness, a voluntary act of obedience to the Father's "will of God" (Luke 22:42). His suffering was not punitive for His own sake, but redemptive for ours, as He "suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God" (1 Peter 3:18). Thus, when believers suffer for "well doing" according to God's will, they are not merely enduring hardship; they are participating in the pattern of Christ's own blameless suffering (Philippians 3:10), bearing witness to His truth, and ultimately sharing in His glory (Romans 8:17). His perfect suffering for righteousness makes our suffering for righteousness meaningful, transforming it from a burden into a privilege that points back to the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).