Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when the prophet that brought him back from the way heard thereof, he said, It is the man of God, who was disobedient unto the word of the LORD: therefore the LORD hath delivered him unto the lion, which hath torn him, and slain him, according to the word of the LORD, which he spake unto him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when the prophet H5030 that brought him back H7725 from the way H1870 heard H8085 thereof, he said H559, It is the man H376 of God H430, who was disobedient H4784 unto the word H6310 of the LORD H3068: therefore the LORD H3068 hath delivered H5414 him unto the lion H738, which hath torn H7665 him, and slain H4191 him, according to the word H1697 of the LORD H3068, which he spake H1696 unto him.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
When the prophet who had brought him back from the road heard about it, he said, "It is the man of God who rebelled against the word of ADONAI; this is why ADONAI handed him over to the lion to tear him to pieces and kill him, in keeping with the word ADONAI spoke to him."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When the prophet who had brought him back from his journey heard this, he said, “It is the man of God who disobeyed the command of the LORD. Therefore the LORD has delivered him to the lion, and it has mauled him and killed him, according to the word that the LORD had spoken to him.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And when the prophet that brought him back from the way heard thereof, he said, It is the man of God, who was disobedient unto the mouth of Jehovah: therefore Jehovah hath delivered him unto the lion, which hath torn him, and slain him, according to the word of Jehovah, which he spake unto him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When the prophet who brought him back from the way heard of it, he said, “It is the man of God who was disobedient to the mouth of the LORD. Therefore the LORD has delivered him to the lion, which has mauled him and slain him, according to the word of the LORD, which he spoke to him.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when the Prophet that brought him backe againe from the waye, hearde thereof, hee sayde, It is the man of God, who hath bene disobedient vnto the commandement of the Lord: therefore the Lord hath deliuered him vnto the lion, which hath rent him and slayne him, according to the worde of the Lord, which hee spake vnto him.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the prophet who brought him back out of the way heareth and saith, `It is the man of God who provoked the mouth of Jehovah, and Jehovah giveth him to the lion, and it destroyeth him, and putteth him to death, according to the word of Jehovah that he spake to him.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
The Sins of Jeroboam
The Sins of Jeroboam View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,211 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 13:26 captures the chilling moment of recognition by the Old Prophet of Bethel, who, upon learning of the Man of God's death by a lion, immediately declares it to be the direct, divinely ordained consequence of the Man of God's explicit disobedience to the LORD's command. This verse serves as a profound theological statement, underscoring the absolute certainty of God's word—whether in prophecy or judgment—and highlighting the severe, unavoidable repercussions for even a prophet who deviates from divine instruction, confirming the tragic event as a precise fulfillment of prophecy rather than a random occurrence.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse provides the pivotal moment of theological interpretation within the dramatic and tragic narrative of 1 Kings 13. The chapter opens with the unnamed Man of God from Judah courageously delivering a prophecy against King Jeroboam's idolatrous altar at Bethel (1 Kings 13:1-3). Crucially, he receives a strict divine command: he must not eat bread or drink water in Bethel, nor return by the same way he came (1 Kings 13:8-9). After fulfilling his initial mission, he is deceptively lured back by an older prophet from Bethel, who fabricates a message from an angel, claiming it overrides the LORD's original instruction to the Man of God (1 Kings 13:18). The Man of God, believing the lie, disobeys the LORD's direct command. Ironically, the Old Prophet himself then receives a true word from the LORD, prophesying the Man of God's death and unburial in his homeland due to his disobedience (1 Kings 13:20-22). Immediately thereafter, while traveling, the Man of God is killed by a lion, yet the lion and a donkey stand remarkably unharmed beside the body, clearly signifying a supernatural, divinely orchestrated event rather than a typical predatory attack (1 Kings 13:24-25). Verse 26 captures the Old Prophet's immediate and accurate interpretation of this astonishing and tragic event, acknowledging its divine origin.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of 1 Kings 13 unfold in the tumultuous early period of the Divided Kingdom, shortly after the schism between Judah and Israel following King Solomon's reign. King Jeroboam I of Israel, driven by political expediency and a fear that his subjects would return to Jerusalem for worship, established alternative, illicit cultic centers at Bethel and Dan, complete with golden calves (1 Kings 12:26-33). This act constituted a profound theological and political rebellion against the LORD and His established worship. Prophets in ancient Israel served as God's direct spokespersons, their authority resting entirely on the fidelity of their message to God's revealed word. The cultural understanding of divine judgment often involved God employing natural elements or creatures as instruments of His will, demonstrating His absolute sovereignty over creation (e.g., the bears mauling youths who mocked Elisha in 2 Kings 2:24). The strict command for the Man of God not to eat or drink in Bethel was likely a symbolic act of complete separation from Jeroboam's defiled kingdom and a crucial test of the prophet's absolute obedience to God's specific instructions for his sacred mission.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes prominent within 1 Kings and the broader Old Testament narrative. Firstly, it starkly illustrates the uncompromising consequences of disobedience to God's explicit commands, even for those called to serve Him. The Man of God, despite his initial faithfulness in confronting Jeroboam, faced divine judgment for yielding to deception and violating a direct divine instruction. This highlights that God holds His servants to a high standard of accountability. Secondly, the narrative emphasizes the sovereignty and undeniable fulfillment of God's word. The Old Prophet's statement, "according to the word of the LORD," underscores that the event was not random but a precise execution of divine prophecy, demonstrating God's ultimate authority and faithfulness to His own declarations. This theme resonates throughout prophetic literature, where God's word is always depicted as accomplishing its intended purpose, never returning void (e.g., Isaiah 55:11). Thirdly, the passage implicitly addresses the theme of discernment and the dangers of false prophecy, even when it comes from a fellow prophet. The Man of God's failure to prioritize the clear, initial word of the LORD over a subsequent, contradictory claim serves as a cautionary tale against spiritual deception, echoing warnings found in passages like Deuteronomy 13:1-5.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Disobedient (Hebrew, mârâh', H4784): This verb (H4784) signifies to be bitter, to rebel, or to resist. It implies a deliberate act of defiance or going against a command, rather than a mere accidental oversight. In this context, it powerfully highlights the Man of God's failure to adhere to the explicit instructions of the LORD, even if influenced by the Old Prophet's deception. The use of this strong term underscores the gravity of his sin, indicating a serious breach of covenant fidelity and a direct affront to divine authority.
  • Word of the LORD (Hebrew, dâbâr_ _Yᵉhôvâh', H1697): This crucial phrase, appearing twice in the verse, combines "dâbâr" (H1697), meaning a word, matter, or thing, with "Yᵉhôvâh" (H3068), the covenant name of God, signifying "the self-Existent or Eternal." When coupled, it denotes God's direct, authoritative, and binding communication, which is active, powerful, and effective. Its repetition emphatically stresses that both the command given to the Man of God and the subsequent judgment were direct emanations of God's sovereign will, highlighting the inviolability and certainty of divine pronouncements.
  • Delivered (Hebrew, nâthan', H5414): While often translated as "gave" or "placed," in this context, "nâthan" (H5414) carries the profound nuance of "handed over" or "surrendered." It implies that the LORD actively and intentionally allowed or caused the Man of God to fall victim to the lion as a direct and purposeful consequence of his disobedience. This underscores God's direct involvement in the execution of judgment, rather than the event being a mere natural accident, emphasizing divine agency in the tragic outcome.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when the prophet that brought him back from the way heard [thereof],": This clause sets the scene for the Old Prophet's realization. He is the one directly responsible for leading the Man of God astray from his divinely appointed "way" or course of action. Hearing the astonishing news of the Man of God's death by a lion, his prophetic insight, perhaps coupled with a guilty conscience, immediately connects the event to the earlier divine pronouncements and his own deceptive actions.
  • "he said, It [is] the man of God, who was disobedient unto the word of the LORD:": The Old Prophet, with striking clarity, identifies the deceased as the Man of God from Judah and, more critically, pinpoints the precise cause of his demise: his disobedience to God's explicit command. This is a profound moment of self-incrimination and theological clarity from the deceiver himself, acknowledging the divine judgment and the inviolability of God's word.
  • "therefore the LORD hath delivered him unto the lion, which hath torn him, and slain him,": This section unequivocally attributes the Man of God's death directly to the LORD's action. The lion is not merely a wild animal acting randomly but an instrument of divine judgment. The LORD "delivered" or "handed over" the disobedient prophet to this fate, signifying a direct, purposeful act of retribution. The graphic details "torn him, and slain him" confirm the violent and definitive nature of the judgment.
  • "according to the word of the LORD, which he spake unto him.": This concluding phrase is paramount to the verse's theological weight. It affirms that the entire tragic event, from the Man of God's disobedience to the lion's attack, unfolded precisely as God had declared it would. It emphasizes the perfect fulfillment of divine prophecy, reinforcing the absolute reliability, power, and ultimate authority of God's spoken word.

Literary Devices

The narrative of 1 Kings 13:26 employs several powerful literary devices. There is profound irony in the Old Prophet, who himself was the direct instrument of deception, being the one to articulate the divine judgment and its precise cause. His stark confession, "It is the man of God, who was disobedient unto the word of the LORD," serves as a chilling admission of truth, even from a flawed and culpable character. The entire chapter, culminating in this verse, functions as a parable of obedience, illustrating the severe and non-negotiable consequences of violating God's direct commands, regardless of one's prophetic calling or initial faithfulness. The repeated phrase "the word of the LORD" acts as a potent thematic repetition or leitmotif, underscoring the absolute centrality, authority, and inviolability of divine revelation throughout the narrative. Furthermore, the lion's unusual behavior (not devouring the body or the donkey) is a powerful form of symbolism, clearly indicating that this was not a natural predatory act but a divinely orchestrated execution of judgment, transforming a wild beast into a precise agent of God's justice.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Kings 13:26 serves as a stark and enduring reminder of the gravity of God's commands and the unwavering certainty of His word. It underscores that divine judgment, though often perceived as harsh, is rooted in God's perfect justice and His unwavering commitment to upholding His own holiness and the integrity of His covenant. Even those who serve God, especially His chosen messengers, are not exempt from accountability for disobedience, particularly when it involves a direct violation of His revealed will. The narrative highlights the critical importance of spiritual discernment and absolute fidelity to God's word above all other voices, even those claiming prophetic authority or divine sanction. It teaches that God's word, once spoken, will inevitably come to pass, whether for blessing or for judgment, demonstrating His absolute sovereignty, faithfulness to His own declarations, and the serious nature of rebellion against His explicit will.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The tragic account of the Man of God from Judah and the Old Prophet of Bethel, culminating in the Old Prophet's stark declaration in 1 Kings 13:26, compels us to a deep and sobering reflection on the nature of obedience and the ultimate authority of God's word. In an age saturated with information and conflicting spiritual voices, this passage powerfully reminds us that God's explicit commands, clearly revealed in Scripture, are paramount and non-negotiable. It challenges us to examine our own lives: are we quick to obey God's clear instructions, or do we allow external pressures, deceptive counsel, or even our own desires to lead us astray from the path of faithfulness? The severity of the Man of God's punishment, despite his initial courageous faithfulness, serves as a sobering reminder that God takes disobedience seriously, especially from those who bear His name and proclaim His word. This narrative is a profound call to cultivate a deep reverence for God's word, to diligently test all claims and counsel against its unchanging truth, and to walk in humble, unwavering submission, knowing that true faithfulness and spiritual vitality are found in radical obedience to the LORD alone.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Old Prophet's confession in this verse highlight the ultimate authority of God's word, even over human deception and manipulation?
  • What does this narrative teach us about the critical importance of discerning between true and false prophetic messages, particularly when they appear to contradict a clear, prior word from God?
  • In what specific areas of your life might you be tempted to compromise on God's clear commands, and what practical steps can you take to prioritize radical and unwavering obedience?
  • How does the concept of God "delivering" the Man of God to the lion inform and deepen your understanding of divine justice, sovereignty, and the consequences of sin?

FAQ

Was the Man of God's punishment too severe for simply eating and drinking?

Answer: The apparent severity of the punishment must be understood within the specific context of the Man of God's divine commission and the nature of his disobedience. His instruction not to eat or drink in Bethel (1 Kings 13:8-9) was not a trivial dietary restriction but a direct, explicit command from the LORD, serving as a symbolic act of complete separation from Jeroboam's idolatrous kingdom and a crucial test of absolute obedience. His sin was not merely the physical act of eating but the profound act of disobeying a clear, unambiguous divine mandate given to him as a prophet. Furthermore, he was deceived by another prophet who claimed to have received a new word from God that contradicted the original, clear command. This highlights a critical failure of discernment and a lack of fidelity to the initial, unambiguous word of the LORD. For a prophet, whose entire authority and effectiveness rested on conveying God's precise and unadulterated word, such disobedience was a grave affront to God's holiness and the integrity of His message, making the judgment a powerful demonstration of God's unwavering commitment to His own word and the accountability of His messengers.

Why was the Old Prophet not punished, given that he was the deceiver?

Answer: The biblical text does not explicitly detail a direct, immediate physical punishment for the Old Prophet, which has led to various scholarly interpretations. Some suggest that his public confession in 1 Kings 13:26 and his subsequent act of burying the Man of God in his own tomb (1 Kings 13:30-31), along with his desire to be buried beside him, indicate a form of repentance, deep remorse, or a profound recognition of his sin and God's justice. His earlier prophetic pronouncement of the Man of God's death in 1 Kings 13:20-22 also shows that God still used him as a vessel for truth, even after his deception. It is possible that his judgment was spiritual, internal, or simply not recorded within the narrative's primary focus. The narrative's central theological emphasis remains on the absolute authority of God's direct word and the severe consequences of disobedience for the one who received it, rather than providing a comprehensive account of the ultimate fates of all involved parties.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic narrative of the Man of God's disobedience and divine judgment in 1 Kings 13:26 powerfully foreshadows the ultimate fulfillment of God's word, justice, and perfect obedience in the person of Jesus Christ. The Man of God's failure highlights humanity's pervasive struggle with obedience, even when divinely commissioned and initially faithful. In stark contrast, Jesus is the perfectly obedient Son, who came not to do His own will but the will of the Father who sent Him (John 6:38). Where the Man of God yielded to deception and faced death for his disobedience, Jesus, the true Prophet and Lamb of God, perfectly fulfilled every word of God, embracing obedience even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). The "word of the LORD" that brought judgment upon the disobedient prophet is the same divine word that, through Christ, offers boundless grace and redemption. Jesus bore the full weight of God's righteous judgment for humanity's pervasive disobedience, becoming the "Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29). Through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, Christ fulfilled the demands of God's justice and righteousness, offering a path to reconciliation and new life for all who believe, ensuring that God's ultimate word—His word of salvation—will also be perfectly fulfilled in those who are "obedient from the heart" to the gospel (Romans 6:17).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 13 verses 23–34

Here is, I. The death of the deceived disobedient prophet. The old prophet that had deluded him, as if he would make him some amends for the wrong he had done him or help to prevent the mischief threatened him, furnished him with an ass to ride home on; but by the way a lion set upon him, and killed him, Kg1 13:23, Kg1 13:24. He did but return back to refresh himself when he was hungry, and behold he must die for it; see Sa1 14:43. But we must consider, 1. That his offence was great, and it would by no means justify him that he was drawn into it by a lie; he could not be so certain of the countermand sent by another as he was of the command given to himself, nor had he any ground to think that the command would be recalled, when the reason of it remained in force, which was that he might testify his detestation of the wickedness of that place. He had great reason to suspect the honesty of this old prophet, who did not himself bear his testimony, nor did God think fit to make use of him as a witness against the idolatry of the city he lived in. However, he should have taken time to beg direction from God, and not have complied so soon. Did he think this old prophet's house safer to eat in than other houses at Beth-el, when God had forbidden him to eat in any? That was to refine upon the command, and make himself wiser than God. Did he think to excuse himself that he was hungry? Had he never read that man lives not by bread alone? 2. That his death was for the glory of God; for by this it appeared, (1.) That nothing is more provoking to him than disobedience to an express command, though in a small matter, which makes his proceedings against our first parents, for eating the forbidden fruit, the easier to be accounted for. (2.) That God is displeased at the sins of his own people, and no man shall be protected in disobedience by the sanctity of his profession, the dignity of his office, his nearness to God, or any good services he has done for him. Perhaps God by this intended, in a way of righteous judgment, to harden Jeroboam's heart, since he was not reformed by the withering of his hand; for he would be apt to make a bad use of it, and to say that the prophet was well enough served for meddling with his altar, he had better have staid at home; any, he would say that Providence had punished him for his insolence, and the lion had done that which his withered hand might not do. However, by this God intended to warn all those whom he employs strictly to observe their orders, at their peril.

II. The wonderful preservation of his dead body, which was a token of God's mercy remembered in the midst of wrath. The lion that gently strangled him, or tore him, did not devour his dead body, nor so much as tear the ass, Kg1 13:24, Kg1 13:25, Kg1 13:26. Nay, what was more, he did not set upon the travellers that passed by and saw it, nor upon the old prophet (who had reason enough to fear it) when he came to take up the corpse. His commission was to kill the prophet; hitherto he should go, but no further. Thus God showed that, though he was angry with him, his anger was turned away, and the punishment went no further than death.

III. The care which the old prophet took of his burial. When he heard of this unusual accident, he concluded it was the man of God, who was disobedient to his Master (and whose fault was that?), therefore the Lord has delivered him to the lion, Kg1 13:26. It would well have become him to ask why the lion was not sent against him and his house, rather than against the good man whom he had cheated. He took up the corpse, Kg1 13:29. If there by any truth in the vulgar opinion, surely the corpse bled afresh when he touched it, for he was in effect the murderer, and it was but a poor reparation for the injury to inter the dead body. Perhaps when he cheated him into his ruin he intended to laugh at him; yet now his conscience so far relents that he weeps over him, and, like Joab at Abner's funeral, is compelled to be a mourner for him whom he had been the death of. They said, Alas! my brother, Kg1 13:30. The case was indeed very lamentable that so good a man, a prophet so faithful, and so bold in God's cause, should, for one offence, die as a criminal, while an old lying prophet lives at ease and an idolatrous prince in pomp and power. Thy way, O God! is in the sea, and thy path in the great waters. We cannot judge of men by their sufferings, nor of sins by their present punishments; with some the flesh is destroyed that the spirit may be saved, while with others the flesh is pampered that the soul may ripen for hell.

IV. The charge which the old prophet gave his sons concerning his own burial, that they should be sure to bury him in the same grave where the man of God was buried (Kg1 13:3): "Lay my bones beside his bones, close by them, as near as may be, so that my dust may mingle with his." Though he was a lying prophet, yet he desired to die the death of a true prophet. "Gather not my soul with the sinners of Beth-el, but with the man of God." The reason he gives is because what he cried against the altar of Beth-el, that men's bones should be burnt upon it, shall surely come to pass, Kg1 13:32. Thus, 1. He ratifies the prediction, that out of the mouth of two witnesses (and one of them such a one as St. Paul quotes, Tit 1:12, one of themselves, even a prophet of their own) the word might be established, if possible to convince and reclaim Jeroboam. 2. He does honour to the deceased prophet, as one whose word would not fall to the ground, though he did. Ministers die, die prematurely it may be; but the word of the Lord endures for ever, and does not die with them. 3. He consults his own interest. It was foretold that men's bones should be burnt upon Jeroboam's altar: "Lay mine (says he) close to his, and then they will not be disturbed;" and it was, accordingly, their security, as we find, Kg2 23:18. Sleeping and waking, living and dying, it is safe being in good company. No mention is made here of the inscription on the prophet's tomb; but it is spoken of Kg2 23:17, where Josiah asks, What title is that? and is told, It is the sepulchre of the man of God that came from Judah, who proclaimed these things which thou hast done; so that the epitaph upon the prophet's grave preserved the remembrance of his prophecy, and was a standing testimony against the idolatries of Beth-el, which it would not have been so remarkably if he had died and been buried elsewhere. The cities of Israel are here called cities of Samaria, though that name was not yet known; for, however the old prophet spoke, the inspired historian wrote in the language of his own time.

V. The obstinacy of Jeroboam in his idolatry (Kg1 13:33): He returned not from his evil way; some hand was found that durst repair the altar God had rent, and then Jeroboam offered sacrifice on it again, and the more boldly because the prophet who disturbed him before was in his grave (Rev 11:10) and because the prophecy was for a great while to come. Various methods had been used to reclaim him, but neither threats nor signs, neither judgments nor mercies, wrought upon him, so strangely was he wedded to his calves. He did not reform, no, not his priesthood, but whoever would, he filled his hand, and made him priest, though ever so illiterate or immoral, and of what tribe soever; and this became sin, that is, a snare first, and then a ruin, to Jeroboam's house, to cut if off, Kg1 13:34. Note, The diminution, disquiet, and desolation of families, are the fruit of sin; he promised himself that the calves would secure the crown to his family, but it proved they lost it, and sunk his family. Those betray themselves that think by any sin to support themselves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 23–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Augustine of HippoAD 430
On the Care of the Dead 7.9
It is not to be imagined that one has been so annihilated by the teeth of a beast that his soul has then been snatched away to infernal punishment, since the same lion who killed his very body guarded it. Even the beast of burden on which the man had been riding was unhurt and with great courage stood in the presence of the wild beast at the destruction of his master. By this miraculous sign it is made clear that the man of God was corrected temporarily even at the point of death rather than that he was punished after death. On this subject the apostle Paul, when he had made mention of certain unpleasant infirmities and death experienced by many, said, “But if we judged ourselves, we should not thus be judged by the Lord. But when we are judged, we are being chastised by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world.”
John CassianAD 435
CONFERENCE 7.25-26
We know that even saintly men have been given over in the flesh to Satan and to great afflictions for some very slight faults, since the divine mercy will not tolerate the very least spot or stain to be found in them on the day of judgment, and purges away in this world every spot of their filth, as the prophet, or rather God himself says, in order that he may commit them to eternity as gold or silver refined and needing no penal purification. “And,” he says,“I will clean purge away your dross, and I will take away all your sin; and after this you will be called the city of the just, a faithful city.” And again: “Just as silver and gold are tried in the furnace, so the Lord chooses hearts.” 18 And again: “The fire tries gold and silver, but man is tried in the furnace of humiliation.” And this also: “For the Lord chastens those whom he loves, and he disciplines every son whom he receives.” We see a clear instance of this in the case of the prophet and man of God in the third book of Kings who was immediately destroyed by a lion for a single disobedience, in which he was implicated not of set purpose nor by the fault of his own will but by the enticement of another. As the Scripture says of him: “It is the man of God, who disobeyed the word of the Lord, and the Lord delivered him to the lion, and it killed him according to the word of the Lord, which he spoke.” The punishment for his present offense and his careless error—together with the reward for his righteousness—for which the Lord gave over his prophet in this world to the destroyer appeared in the moderation and abstinence of the beast of prey, when that most savage creature did not dare even to taste the carcass that was given over to him.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
DIALOGUE 4.24-25
It is written in the Scriptures, “But the just man, though he die early, shall be at rest.” What, then, does it matter to the just if they undergo harsh treatment at death, since they are on their way to eternal life? Sometimes, perhaps, it is a fault of theirs, slight though it be, that has to be expiated by such a death. For this reason the reprobate are given power over the just while they are still alive. But, once the just have died, the wicked are punished all the more severely because of the cruel power they exercised against holy people. This is demonstrated in the case of the barbarian who was permitted by God to strike down the deacon but was not allowed to rejoice over his death. It is also verified in holy Scripture. The man of God, for instance, who was sent to Samaria stopped on the way for a meal, contrary to God’s command. For this disobedience he was killed by a lion. But Scripture at once adds that the donkey and the lion were standing by the dead prophet, and “the lion had not eaten of the dead body.” From this passage we see that the sin of disobedience was atoned for by his death, because the lion attacked the living prophet and killed him, yet did not dare touch him once he was dead. God allowed the beast to kill, but not to eat of its kill, because the prophet, though blameworthy in life, was sanctified in the death he suffered as a punishment for his disobedience. In the first instance the lion took away the life of a sinner; in the second he stood guard over the body of a just man.
Ishodad of MervAD 850
BOOKS OF SESSIONS 1 KINGS 13:24-28
Through the words “a lion killed him” [the Scripture] shows that [the lion] strangled and killed him according to God’s command. And through the sentence “it did not eat him,” it shows that [the animal] was not urged by hunger but acted in compliance with God’s order. And this was done in order that Jeroboam and his priests might understand that, if this had happened to the prophet just because he had eaten, something extremely more serious would happen to those who made offerings to the idols.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 13:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.