TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 12:1–15. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Solomon had 1000 wives and concubines, yet we read but of one son he had to bear up his name, and he a fool. It is said (Hos 4:10), They shall commit whoredom, and shall not increase. Sin is a bad way of building up a family. Rehoboam was the son of the wisest of men, yet did not inherit his father's wisdom, and then it stood him in little stead to inherit his father's throne. Neither wisdom nor grace runs in the blood. Solomon came to the crown very young, yet he was then a wise man. Rehoboam came to the crown at forty years old, when men will be wise if ever they will, yet he was then foolish. Wisdom does not go by age, nor is it the multitude of years nor the advantage of education that reaches it. Solomon's court was a mart of wisdom and the rendezvous of learned men, and Rehoboam was the darling of the court; and yet all was not sufficient to make him a wise man. The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. No dispute is made of Rehoboam's succession; upon the death of his father, he was immediately proclaimed. But,
I.The people desired a treaty with him at Shechem, and he condescended to meet them there.
1.Their pretence was to make him king, but the design was to unmake him. They would give him a public inauguration in another place than the city of David, that he might not seem to be king of Judah only. They had ten parts in him, and would have him among themselves for once, that they might recognize his title.
2.The place was ominous: at Shechem, where Abimelech set up himself (Jdg. 9); yet it had been famous for the convention of the states there, Jos 24:1. Rehoboam, we may suppose, knew of the threatening, that the kingdom should be rent from him, and hoped by going to Shechem, and treating there with the ten tribes, to prevent it: yet it proved the most impolitic thing he could do, and hastened the rupture.
II.The representatives of the tribes addressed him, praying to be eased of the taxes they were burdened with.
The meeting being appointed, they sent for Jeroboam out of Egypt to come and be their speaker. This they needed not to have done: he knew what God had designed him for, and would have come though he had not been sent for, for now was his time to expect the possession of the promised crown. In their address,
1.They complain of the last reign: Thy father made our yoke grievous, Kg1 12:4. They complain not of his father's idolatry and revolt from God; that which was the greatest grievance of all was none to them, so careless and indifferent were they in the matters of religion, as if God or Moloch were all one, so they might but live at ease and pay no taxes. Yet the complaint was groundless and unjust. Never did people live more at ease than they did, nor in great plenty. Did they pay taxes? It was to advance the strength and magnificence of their kingdom. If Solomon's buildings cost them money, they cost them no blood, as war would do. Were many servile hands employed about them? They were not the hands of the Israelites. Were the taxes a burden? How could that be, when Solomon imported bullion in such plenty that silver was, in a manner, as common as the stones? So that they did but render to Solomon the things that were Solomon's. Nay, suppose there was some hardship put upon them, were they not told before that this would be the manner of the king and yet they would have one? The best government cannot secure itself from reproach and censure, no, not Solomon's. Factious spirits will never want something to complain of. I know nothing in Solomon's administration that could make the people's yoke grievous, unless perhaps the women whom in his latter days he doted on were connived at in oppressing them.
2.They demand relief from him, and on this condition will continue in their allegiance to the house of David. They asked not to be wholly free from paying taxes, but to have the burden made lighter; this was all their care, to save their money, whether their religion was supported and the government protected or no. All seek their own.
III.Rehoboam consulted with those about him concerning the answer he should give to this address.
It was prudent to take advice, especially having so weak a head of his own; yet, upon this occasion, it was impolitic to take time himself to consider, for thereby he gave time to the disaffected people to ripen things for a revolt, and his deliberating in so plain a case would be improved as an indication of the little concern he had for the people's ease. They saw what they must expect, and prepared accordingly. Now,
1.The grave experienced men of his council advised him by all means to give the petitioners a kind answer, to give them good words, to promise them fair, and this day, this critical day, to serve them, that is, to tell them that he was their servant, and that he would redress all their grievances and make it his business to please them and make them easy. "Deny thyself (say they) so far as to do this for this once, and they will be thy servants for ever. When the present heat is allayed with a soft answer, and the assembly dismissed, their cooler thoughts will reconcile and fix them to Solomon's family still." Note, The way to rule is to serve, to do good, and stoop to do it, to become all things to all men and so win their hearts. Those who are in power really sit highest, and easiest, and safest, when they take this method.
2.The young men of his council were hot and haughty, and they advised him to return a severe and threatening answer to the people's demands. It was an instance of Rehoboam's weakness,
(1.)That he did not prefer aged counsellors, but had a better opinion of the young men that had grown up with him and with whom he was familiar, Kg1 12:8. Days should speak. It was a folly for him to think that, because they had been his agreeable companions in the sports and pleasures of his youth, they were therefore fit to have the management of the affairs of his kingdom. Great wits have not always the most wisdom; nor are those to be relied on as our best friends that know how to make us merry, for that will not make us happy. It is of great consequence to young people, that are setting out in the world, whom they associate with, accommodate themselves to, and depend upon for advice. If they reckon those that feed their pride, gratify their vanity, and further them in their pleasures, their best friends, they are already marked for ruin.
(2.)That he did not prefer moderate counsels, but was pleased with those that put him upon harsh and rigorous methods, and advised him to double the taxes, whether there was occasion for so doing or no, and to tell them in plain terms that he would do so, Kg1 12:10, Kg1 12:11. These young counsellors thought the old men expressed themselves but dully, Kg1 12:7. They affect to be witty in their advice, and value themselves on that. The old men did not undertake to put words into Rehoboam's mouth, only counselled him to speak good words; but the young men will furnish him with very quaint and pretty phrases, with pointed and pert similitudes: My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins, etc. That is not always the best sense that is best worded.
IV.He answered the people according to the counsel of the young men, Kg1 12:14, Kg1 12:15.
He affected to be haughty and imperious, and fancied he could carry all before him with a high hand, and therefore would rather run the risk of losing them than deny himself so far as to give them good words. Note, Many ruin themselves by consulting their humour more than their interest. See,
1.How Rehoboam was infatuated in his counsels. He could not have acted more foolishly and impoliticly.
(1.)He owned their reflections upon his father's government to be true: My father made your yoke heavy; and therein he was unjust to his father's memory, which he might easily have vindicated from the imputation.
(2.)He fancied himself better able to manage them, and impose upon them, than his father was, not considering that he was vastly inferior to him in capacity. Could he think to support the blemishes of his father's reign who could never pretend to come near the glories of it?
(3.)He threatened not only to squeeze them by taxes, but to chastise them by cruel laws and severe executions of them, which should be not as whips only, but as scorpions, whips with rowels in them, that will fetch blood at every lash. In short, he would use them as brute beasts, load them and beat them at his pleasure: not caring whether they loved him or no, he would make them fear him.
(4.)He gave this provocation to a people that by long ease and prosperity were made wealthy, and strong, and proud, and would not be trampled upon (as a poor cowed dispirited people may), to a people that were now disposed to revolt, and had one ready to head them. Never, surely, was man so blinded by pride and affectation of arbitrary power, than which nothing is more fatal.
2.How God's counsels were hereby fulfilled. It was from the Lord, Kg1 12:15. He left Rehoboam to his own folly, and hid from his eyes the things which belonged to his peace, that the kingdom might be rent from him. Note, God serves his own wise and righteous purposes by the imprudences and iniquities of men, and snares sinners in the work of their own hands. Those that lose the kingdom of heaven throw it away, as Rehoboam did his, by their own wilfulness and folly.
Continue studying 1 Kings 12:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Kings 12:5 records a pivotal moment at the dawn of Rehoboam's reign, immediately following the death of King Solomon. Faced with a unified and urgent plea from the Israelite tribes, led by Jeroboam, to alleviate the oppressive burdens imposed by his father, Rehoboam responds by requesting a three-day delay before rendering his decision. This seemingly prudent pause, however, sets the stage for a series of consultations and choices that would tragically culminate in the irreversible division of the united kingdom of Israel, marking a critical turning point in the nation's history and the trajectory of God's people.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is strategically placed at the very outset of Rehoboam's kingship, directly after the death of Solomon and the assembly of all Israel at Shechem to confirm Rehoboam as king. The preceding verses, specifically 1 Kings 12:1-4, meticulously detail the people's collective grievance, spearheaded by Jeroboam, against the onerous policies of Solomon's later reign, particularly the heavy taxation and forced labor. Rehoboam's request for a three-day delay serves as his initial, non-committal response to this critical and potentially volatile demand. This pause masterfully builds dramatic tension, setting the narrative arc for the subsequent verses where Rehoboam consults with two distinct groups of advisors—the seasoned elders and his youthful peers—before making his fateful decision, which ultimately leads to the schism vividly recounted in 1 Kings 12:16-19.
Historical & Cultural Context
The assembly's location at Shechem carries profound historical and cultural weight. Shechem was not merely a convenient meeting point; it was a site steeped in Israelite history, frequently associated with covenant renewals, tribal gatherings, and significant national decisions, as seen in Joshua 24:1. The people's grievances were deeply rooted in the economic and social strains caused by Solomon's ambitious building projects, which necessitated extensive taxation and widespread forced labor (1 Kings 11:28). Culturally, a newly crowned king was expected to demonstrate wisdom, justice, and a genuine willingness to address the needs and burdens of his populace, often through an inaugural pronouncement or policy adjustment. Rehoboam's delay, while appearing to be a move towards prudence, inadvertently created a vacuum of leadership and heightened the people's anticipation, potentially exacerbating their underlying discontent and setting the stage for a more volatile reaction to his eventual pronouncement.
Key Themes
This concise verse introduces several crucial themes that resonate throughout the narrative of 1 Kings and beyond. Firstly, it underscores the nature of leadership and the paramount importance of wise counsel and discerning judgment in governance. Rehoboam's initial pause for deliberation, though seemingly a good first step, ultimately leads to a catastrophic choice, highlighting the critical difference between merely seeking counsel and truly heeding wise counsel. Secondly, the verse exposes the deep-seated discontent and burgeoning division simmering within the Israelite tribes, particularly concerning the oppressive policies of the united monarchy, thereby foreshadowing the inevitable schism. Finally, the specified "three days" signifies a moment of decision, a critical juncture where the future trajectory of the nation hangs precariously in the balance. It powerfully illustrates how seemingly minor delays or choices can set in motion events of monumental and irreversible consequence, as vividly demonstrated by the ultimate division of the kingdom into Judah and Israel (1 Kings 12:16).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
A primitive root meaning "to say" with broad applications including to answer, appoint, bid, command, declare, or speak. In this context, it signifies Rehoboam's authoritative pronouncement as the new king. It's not a question but a directive, asserting his initial control over the situation and the timing of his response, even if that response is a delay.
A primitive root meaning "to walk" or "to go," often used causatively to carry or lead. Here, it functions as a direct command for the people to withdraw from his presence. It implies a temporary dismissal, an assertion of royal prerogative to control the flow of the audience, and a deliberate act to buy time before facing the critical demands.
A primitive root meaning "to turn back," "return," or "again." This word emphasizes the expectation of the people's re-assembly. It's not a permanent dismissal but a deferral, indicating that Rehoboam intends to provide an answer, thereby maintaining the tension and the people's anticipation for his eventual decision.
Verse Breakdown
"And he said unto them,"
This opening clause immediately identifies Rehoboam as the speaker, establishing his nascent authority as king addressing the assembled representatives of Israel. It sets the scene for a formal interaction, underscoring the gravity of the moment and his position at the head of the nation.
"Depart yet [for] three days,"
This is Rehoboam's direct and specific command. He instructs the people to leave his immediate presence but to return after a precise interval of three days. The "three days" is a common biblical idiom for a short, significant period of waiting or deliberation, suggesting that Rehoboam intends to carefully consider their weighty petition rather than issuing an immediate, potentially ill-considered, response. It reflects a desire for counsel, though the quality and outcome of that counsel will prove to be his undoing.
"then come again to me."
This part of the command reinforces the expectation of their return, indicating that a definitive decision will be rendered at that appointed time. It highlights Rehoboam's control over the timing and manner of his royal pronouncement, requiring the people to await his verdict and submit to his schedule.
"And the people departed."
This concluding clause confirms the immediate and respectful obedience of the people to Rehoboam's instruction. It demonstrates their initial deference to royal authority and their willingness to await his decision, thereby amplifying the tension and anticipation building around the king's impending and momentous pronouncement.
Literary Devices
The verse powerfully employs Foreshadowing by establishing a critical delay that subtly hints at the momentous and ultimately tragic events destined to unfold. Rehoboam's pause, while ostensibly an act of prudence, ironically serves as the catalyst for his catastrophic decision. There is a palpable sense of Dramatic Irony at play, as the reader, possessing the broader narrative knowledge, is acutely aware of the disastrous outcome of this delay, while the characters within the narrative (Rehoboam and the assembled people) remain steeped in suspense regarding the future of the united kingdom. The "three days" itself functions as a potent Pivotal Moment, a literary device that marks a crucial turning point in the narrative, emphasizing the extremely high stakes and the irreversible nature of the choices that lie ahead. The simple, direct language used throughout the verse also effectively cultivates a profound sense of Urgency and Tension, as the very future and unity of the kingdom hang precariously in the balance during this brief, yet profoundly significant, interlude.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This seemingly straightforward verse carries immense theological weight, profoundly underscoring the critical nature of leadership, the consequences of human choices, and the intricate interplay with God's sovereign plan. Rehoboam's request for a delay, while an attempt to exercise prudence, ultimately becomes a direct catalyst for the division of the kingdom, revealing that even seemingly well-intentioned pauses can lead to disastrous outcomes if not accompanied by genuine wisdom, humility, and a heart attuned to God's will and the true welfare of His people. The narrative implicitly offers a sharp critique of leadership that prioritizes self-interest, pride, or ill-advised counsel over the legitimate concerns and well-being of the governed—a theme central to the Deuteronomic understanding of righteous kingship. It powerfully illustrates that while God often allows human decisions, even deeply flawed ones, to unfold according to their natural consequences, He remains utterly sovereign over the larger historical trajectory, meticulously working His divine purposes through, and sometimes even despite, human folly and rebellion.
Reflection and Application
Rehoboam's initial response in 1 Kings 12:5 offers timeless and profound lessons for all forms of leadership, personal decision-making, and the indispensable importance of seeking and heeding wise counsel. While taking time for careful deliberation on significant matters is indeed a hallmark of prudence and thoughtful leadership, the quality, source, and ultimate acceptance of that counsel are paramount. Rehoboam's subsequent choices, detailed in the following verses, powerfully reveal the grave danger of rejecting seasoned wisdom and compassionate advice in favor of the rash, prideful, or self-aggrandizing counsel of those who merely flatter or reinforce one's own biases. For us today, this verse serves as a potent and challenging reminder that in moments of critical decision—whether in our personal lives, within our families, in our workplaces, or in broader leadership roles—we must not only pause for reflection but also diligently and humbly seek counsel from those who are truly wise, experienced, discerning, and firmly grounded in truth and integrity. Furthermore, it highlights the profound responsibility of leaders to genuinely listen to the legitimate concerns and burdens of those they serve, demonstrating authentic empathy and a sincere willingness to alleviate burdens rather than imposing or exacerbating them. The consequences of our decisions, both individual and communal, often ripple far beyond the immediate moment, underscoring the urgent need for prayerful discernment, humble reliance on divine guidance, and a commitment to the welfare of others.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Rehoboam ask for three days before giving his answer?
Rehoboam likely requested a three-day delay to allow himself sufficient time to deliberate on the people's significant and challenging petition. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, it was a common practice for new rulers or leaders to consult with various advisors before making major decisions, especially those with national implications. This pause was intended to allow for careful consideration, the seeking of counsel from different factions, and the formulation of a well-thought-out response, as indicated by his subsequent consultations with both the experienced elders and the young men who had grown up with him, as described in 1 Kings 12:6-8.
Was Rehoboam's decision to delay a wise one?
While taking time for deliberation is generally a wise and prudent approach to significant decisions, Rehoboam's delay itself was not inherently good or bad; it was his use of that time that proved disastrous. He did seek counsel, which is commendable, but he ultimately rejected the wise, compassionate, and experienced advice of the elders in favor of the harsh, prideful, and ill-conceived counsel of his younger peers (see 1 Kings 12:6-11). Thus, the delay, which could have led to a prudent and unifying resolution, instead became the tragic prelude to the kingdom's division due to his profound lack of discernment in choosing which advice to follow.
What was the significance of Shechem as the place where this event occurred?
Shechem held deep historical, religious, and political significance for Israel. It was the place where Abraham first built an altar to the Lord upon entering Canaan (Genesis 12:6-7). More significantly for this context, it was where Joshua gathered all the tribes of Israel to renew their covenant with God before his death, reaffirming their commitment to the Lord (Joshua 24:1). Its selection for Rehoboam's coronation and the assembly of the tribes underscored its importance as a traditional site for national assembly and covenantal reaffirmation. This historical backdrop makes the subsequent division of the kingdom at Shechem even more poignant and symbolic, representing a profound breaking of national unity and covenant fidelity.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Rehoboam's failure to provide compassionate and discerning leadership, coupled with his ultimate choice to impose a heavier yoke upon the people, stands in stark contrast to the perfect, redemptive kingship of Jesus Christ. While Rehoboam sought to increase the burdens of his subjects, leading to division and suffering, Christ, the true King, extends an open invitation to all who are weary and burdened, promising rest for their souls and declaring that His yoke is easy and His burden is light (Matthew 11:28-30). Unlike Rehoboam, whose pride and foolish counsel led to the fragmentation of the kingdom, Jesus is the Good Shepherd who willingly lays down His life for His sheep (John 10:11) and actively unites His diverse people into one indivisible flock under His loving care (John 10:16). Rehoboam's ill-advised counsel resulted in national calamity, but Christ is the very embodiment of divine wisdom, the eternal Word made flesh (John 1:1-14), whose counsel always leads to abundant life, profound peace, and ultimate liberation from the true burdens of sin, death, and spiritual oppression. His reign is not one of tyranny or increased burdens but of grace, truth, and eternal redemption, establishing an everlasting kingdom that will never be divided or brought to an end (Luke 1:33; Daniel 2:44).