TRV
Translation
King James Version
And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?
Complete Jewish Bible
Even with lifeless musical instruments, such as a flute or a harp, how will anyone recognize the melody if one note can’t be distinguished from another?
Berean Standard Bible
Even in the case of lifeless instruments, such as the flute or harp, how will anyone recognize the tune they are playing unless the notes are distinct?
American Standard Version
Even things without life, giving a voice, whether pipe or harp, if they give not a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?
World English Bible Messianic
Even things without life, giving a voice, whether pipe or harp, if they didn’t give a distinction in the sounds, how would it be known what is piped or harped?
Geneva Bible (1599)
Moreouer things without life which giue a sounde, whether it be a pipe or an harpe, except they make a distinction in the soundes, how shall it be knowen what is piped or harped?
Young's Literal Translation
yet the things without life giving sound--whether pipe or harp--if a difference in the sounds they may not give, how shall be known that which is piped or that which is harped?
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 28,686 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Corinthians 14 verses 6–14
6 ¶ Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine?
7 And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?
8 For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?
9 So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air.
10 There are, it may be, so many kinds of voices in the world, and none of them is without signification.
11 Therefore if I know not the meaning of the voice, I shall be unto him that speaketh a barbarian, and he that speaketh shall be a barbarian unto me.
12 Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church.
13 Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret.
14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
In this paragraph he goes on to show how vain a thing the ostentation of speaking unknown and unintelligible language must be. It was altogether unedifying and unprofitable (Co1 14:6): If I come to you speaking with tongues, what will it profit you, unless I speak to you by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine? It would signify nothing to utter any of these in an unknown tongue. An apostle, with all his furniture, could not edify, unless he spoke to the capacity of his hearers. New revelations, the most clear explications of old ones, the most instructive discourses in themselves, would be unprofitable in a language not understood. Nay, interpretations of scripture made in an unknown tongue would need to be interpreted over again, before they could be of any use.
I. He illustrates this by several allusions. 1. To a pipe and a harp playing always in one tone. Of what use can this be to those who are dancing? If there be no distinction of sounds, how should they order their steps or motions? Unintelligible language is like piping or harping without distinction of sounds: it gives no more direction how a man should order his conversation than a pipe with but one stop or a harp with but one string can direct a dancer how he should order his steps, Co1 14:7. 2. To a trumpet giving an uncertain sound, adēlon phōnēn, a sound not manifest; either not the proper sound for the purpose, or not distinct enough to be discerned from every other sound. If, instead of sounding on onset, it sounded a retreat, or sounded one knew not what, who would prepare for the battle? To talk in an unknown language in a Christian assembly is altogether as vain and to no purpose as for a trumpet to give no certain sound in the field or day of battle. The army in one case, and the congregation in the other, must be all in suspense, and at a perfect nonplus. To speak words that have no significancy to those who hear them is to leave them ignorant of what is spoken; it is speaking to the air, Co1 14:9. Words without a meaning can convey no notion nor instruction to the mind; and words not understood have no meaning with those who do not understand them: to talk to them in such language is to waste our breath. 3. He compares the speaking in an unknown tongue to the gibberish of barbarians. There are, as he says (Co1 14:10), many kinds of voices in the world, none of which is without its proper signification. This is true of the several languages spoken by different nations. All of them have their proper signification. Without this they would be phōnai aphōnoi - a voice, and no voice. For that is no language, nor can it answer the end of speaking, which has no meaning. But whatever proper signification the words of any language may have in themselves, and to those who understand them, they are perfect gibberish to men of another language, who understand them not. In this case, speaker and hearers are barbarians to each other (Co1 14:11), they talk and hear only sounds without sense; for this is to be a barbarian. For thus says the polite Ovid, when banished into Pontus,
Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor ulli,
I am a barbarian here, none understand me.
To speak in the church in an unknown tongue is to talk gibberish; it is to play the barbarian; it is to confound the audience, instead of instructing them; and for this reason is utterly vain and unprofitable.
II. Having thus established his point, in the two next verses he applies, 1. By advising them to be chiefly desirous of those gifts that were most for the church's edification, Co1 14:12. "Forasmuch as you are zealous of spiritual gifts, this way it will become commendable zeal, be zealous to edify the church, to promote Christian knowledge and practice, and covet those gifts most that will do the best service to men's souls." This is the great rule he gives, which, 2. He applies to the matter in hand, that, if they did speak a foreign language, they should beg of God the gift of interpreting it, Co1 14:13. That these were different gifts, see Co1 12:10. Those might speak and understand a foreign language who could not readily translate it into their own: and yet was this necessary to the church's edification; for the church must understand, that it might be edified, which yet it could not do till the foreign language was translated into its own. Let him therefore pray for the gift of interpreting what he speaks in an unknown tongue; or rather covet and ask of God the gift of interpreting than of speaking in a language that needs interpretation, this being most for the church's benefit, and therefore among the gifts that excel; vide Co1 14:12. Some understand it, "Let him pray so as to interpret what he utters in prayer in a language unintelligible without it." The sum is that they should perform all religious exercises in their assemblies so that all might join in them and profit by them. 3. He enforces this advice with a proper reason, that, if he prayed in an unknown tongue, his spirit might pray, that is, a spiritual gift might be exercised in prayer, or his own mind might be devoutly engaged, but his understanding would be unfruitful (Co1 14:14), that is, the sense and meaning of his words would be unfruitful, he would not be understood, nor therefore would others join with him in his devotions. Note, It should be the concern of such as pray in public to pray intelligibly, not in a foreign language, nor in a language that, if it be not foreign, is above the level of his audience. Language that is most obvious and easy to be understood is the most proper for public devotion and other religious exercises.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–14. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on 1 Corinthians 35
"Even things without life, giving a voice, whether pipe or harp, if they give not a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped?"
"And why do I say," saith he, "that in our case this is unprofitable, and that only useful which is dear and easy to be apprehended by the hearers? Since even in musical instruments without life one may see this: for whether it be pipe or harp, yet if it be struck or blown confusedly and unskilfully, without proper cadence or harmony, it will captivate none of the hearers. For even in these inarticulate sounds there is need of some distinctness: and if thou strike not or breathe into the pipe according to art, thou hast done nothing. Now if from things without life we require so much distinctness, and harmony, and appropriateness, and into those inarticulate sounds we strive and contend to infuse so much meaning, much more in men indued with life and reason, and in spiritual gifts, ought one to make significancy an object.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 14:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
First Corinthians 14:7 employs a vivid analogy from the realm of music to underscore the paramount importance of clarity and intelligibility in all forms of spiritual expression within the Christian assembly. Paul argues that just as musical instruments like a pipe or harp must produce distinct, discernible notes to convey a recognizable tune, so too must spiritual utterances, particularly speaking in tongues and prophecy, be clear and understandable to be beneficial and edifying to the gathered believers. Without such distinction, communication becomes meaningless noise, failing to build up the body of Christ.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Paul masterfully employs Analogy in this verse, drawing a parallel between the function of musical instruments and the nature of spiritual utterances. The familiar experience of listening to music, where distinct notes are essential for understanding a tune, serves as a powerful illustration for the necessity of clear, intelligible speech in the church. The Rhetorical Question, "how shall it be known what is piped or harped?", serves to emphasize the self-evident truth that unintelligible sounds are meaningless. This question is not meant to be answered, but to provoke thought and underscore the logical conclusion that clarity is indispensable for comprehension. The verse also implicitly uses Metonymy, where "pipe" and "harp" stand for the music or message they produce, further reinforcing the idea that the output must be clear for the instrument to fulfill its purpose.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse powerfully articulates a fundamental principle of divine communication and corporate worship: God desires order, clarity, and edification within His assembly. The analogy of musical instruments underscores that any form of spiritual expression, whether prophecy, teaching, or speaking in tongues, must be intelligible to be truly beneficial. If the message cannot be understood, it cannot instruct, encourage, or console, thereby failing to achieve its God-given purpose of building up the body of Christ. This principle reflects God's own character as a God of order and peace, not confusion, and highlights His desire for His people to grow in knowledge and understanding through His Word.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
First Corinthians 14:7 serves as a timeless reminder that the primary goal of all communication within the church, especially in public settings, is to build up and bless the listeners. It challenges us to evaluate our own communication—whether in teaching, preaching, sharing, or even personal conversations about faith—for clarity and intelligibility. Are our words distinct, purposeful, and easy to understand, or do they resemble an indistinct noise that leaves others confused? For those who lead or teach, this verse calls for careful preparation, plain language, and a sincere desire to make the message accessible to all, regardless of their spiritual maturity or background. For all believers, it encourages us to seek understanding, to ask questions when confused, and to value spiritual expressions that contribute to the collective growth and comprehension of the body. Ultimately, it fosters an environment where God's truth can be clearly heard, deeply understood, and effectively applied, leading to genuine spiritual edification and unity.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does Paul use musical instruments as an analogy for spiritual gifts?
Answer: Paul uses musical instruments (pipe and harp) as an analogy because they were common, everyday objects familiar to his Corinthian audience. Everyone understood that a musical instrument, to be effective, must produce distinct, recognizable notes that form a melody or rhythm. If the sounds are indistinct, it's just noise, not music. This simple, relatable example powerfully illustrates his point: just as unintelligible musical sounds are useless for conveying a tune, so too are unintelligible spiritual utterances useless for conveying God's message and edifying the church. It's a highly effective way to emphasize the necessity of clarity and intelligibility in communication, especially in public worship, as seen in 1 Corinthians 14:9.
How does this verse apply to modern worship practices, beyond speaking in tongues?
Answer: While 1 Corinthians 14:7 is part of a discussion on spiritual gifts, its principle of intelligibility extends to all aspects of modern worship. It applies to preaching (is the sermon clear and understandable?), teaching (are the Bible studies accessible?), worship leading (are the song lyrics clear and the music harmonious?), and even testimonies or prayers offered publicly. The core message is that anything communicated in a corporate gathering should be done in a way that allows all present to comprehend, learn, and be edified. If communication is unclear, overly academic, or uses jargon without explanation, it becomes like an "indistinct sound" that fails to build up the body, as Paul emphasizes throughout 1 Corinthians 14.
Does this verse imply that speaking in tongues without interpretation is forbidden?
Answer: This verse, in conjunction with the broader context of 1 Corinthians 14, strongly implies that speaking in tongues in a public church gathering without interpretation is unhelpful and should be avoided. Paul states that if no one can understand what is being said, it cannot edify the church (1 Corinthians 14:5). He explicitly instructs that if someone speaks in a tongue, there must be an interpreter; if there is no interpreter, they should remain silent in the church and speak to themselves and to God (1 Corinthians 14:27-28). The emphasis is on order and edification for the entire body, not on forbidding the gift itself, but regulating its use for the common good.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
First Corinthians 14:7, with its emphasis on clarity and intelligibility, profoundly points to Christ as the ultimate and perfectly clear communication from God to humanity. Before Christ, God spoke in various ways through prophets and visions (Hebrews 1:1), but in Christ, God has spoken His final, most distinct, and most understandable Word (Hebrews 1:2-3). Jesus Himself is the Word made flesh (John 1:14), the perfect revelation of the Father, making God's character and will fully "known" to us. Unlike the indistinct sounds of a poorly played instrument, Christ's life, teaching, death, and resurrection are the clear, unmistakable melody of God's redemptive love. The gospel message, centered on Christ, is designed to be proclaimed with clarity so that all may hear and understand, leading to faith and salvation (Romans 10:14-17). Thus, the call for intelligible communication in the church ultimately reflects the nature of God's self-revelation in His Son, who is the very embodiment of divine clarity and truth, ensuring that the message of salvation is not a confusing noise but a distinct, life-giving sound.