1 Corinthians 10:15
“Flee from Idolatry and Demonic Tables”1 Corinthians 10:14–22
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ὡςhōsAsG5613PRTParticle or Disjunctive
- φρονίμοιςphronimoisto sensible [ones]G5429A-DPMAdjective Dative Plural Masculine
- λέγωlegōI speakG3004V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
- κρίνατεkrinatedo judgeG2919V-AAM-2PVerb Aorist Active Imperative 2nd Plural
- ὑμεῖςhumeisfor yourselvesG4771P-2NPPersonal pronoun Nominative 2nd Plural
- ὅhowhatG3739R-ASNRelative pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
- φημιphēmiI sayG5346V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 10:15–22. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In this passage the apostle urges the general caution against idolatry, in the particular case of eating the heathen sacrifices as such, and out of any religious respect to the idol to whom they were sacrificed.
I.He prefaces his argument with an appeal to their own reason and judgment:
"I speak to wise men, judge you what I say, 1 Corinthians 10:15. You are great pretenders to wisdom, to close reasoning and argument; I can leave it with your own reason and conscience whether I do not argue justly." Note, It is no dishonour to an inspired teacher, nor disadvantage to his argument, to appeal for the truth of it to the reason and consciences of his hearers. It comes upon them with the greater force when it comes with this conviction. Paul, an inspired apostle, would yet, in some cases, leave it with the Corinthians to judge whether what he taught was not conformable to their own light and sense.
II.He lays down his argument from the Lord's supper:
The cup which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? Is not this sacred rite an instrument of communion with God? Do we not therein profess to be in friendship, and to have fellowship, with him? Is it not a token whereby we professedly hold communion with Christ, whose body was broken, and blood shed, to procure remission of our sins, and the favour of God? And can we be in alliance with Christ, or friendship with God, without being devoted to him? In short, the Lord's supper is a feast on the sacrificed body and blood of our Lord, epulum ex oblatis. And to eat of the feast is to partake of the sacrifice, and so to be his guests to whom the sacrifice was offered, and this in token of friendship with him. Thus to partake of the Lord's table is to profess ourselves his guests and covenant people. This is the very purpose and intention of this symbolical eating and drinking; it is holding communion with God, and partaking of those privileges, and professing ourselves under those obligations, which result from the death and sacrifice of Christ; and this in conjunction with all true Christians, with whom we have communion also in this ordinance. Because the bread is one, we, being many, are one body, for we are made partakers of one bread, or loaf (1 Corinthians 10:17), which I think is thus more truly rendered: "By partaking of one broken loaf, the emblem of our Saviour's broken body, who is the only true bread that came down from heaven, we coalesce into one body, become members of him and one another." Those who truly partake by faith have this communion with Christ, and one another; and those who eat the outward elements make profession of having this communion, of belonging to God and the blessed fraternity of his people and worshippers. This is the true meaning of this holy rite.
III.He confirms this from the Jewish worship and customs:
Behold Israel after the flesh: are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar, that is, of the sacrifice offered upon it? Those who were admitted to eat of the offerings were reckoned to partake of the sacrifice itself, as made for them, and to be sanctified thereby; and therefore surely to worship God, and be in alliance or covenant with him, even the God of Israel, to whom the sacrifice was made: this was a symbol or token of holding communion with him.
IV.He applies this to the argument against feasting with idolaters on their sacrifices, and to prove those that do so idolaters. This he does,
1.By following the principle on which they would argue it to be lawful, namely, that an idol was nothing. Many of them were nothing at all, none of them had any divinity in them. What was sacrificed to idols was nothing, no way changed from what it was before, but was every whit as fit for food, considered in itself. They indeed seem to argue that, because an idol was nothing, what was offered was no sacrifice, but common and ordinary food, of which they might therefore eat with as little scruple. Now the apostle allows that the food was not changed as to its nature, was as fit to be eaten as common food, where it was set before any who knew not of its having been offered to an idol. But,
2.He proves that the eating of it as a part of a heathen sacrifice was, (1.) A partaking with them in their idolatry. It was having fellowship with devils, because what the Gentiles sacrificed they sacrificed to devils; and to feast with them upon these sacrifices was to partake in the sacrifice, and therefore to worship the god to whom it was made, and have fellowship or communion with him just as he who eats the Lord's supper is supposed to partake in the Christian sacrifice; or as those who ate the Jewish sacrifices partook of what was offered on their altar. But heathens sacrificed to devils: "Therefore do not feast on their sacrifices. Doing it is a token of your having fellowship with the demons to whom they are offered. I would not have you be in communion with devils." (2.) It was a virtual renouncing of Christianity: You cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: you cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and the table of devils, 1 Corinthians 10:21. To partake of this Christian feast was to have communion with Christ: to partake of the feasts made in honour of the heathen idols, and made of things sacrificed to them, was to have communion with devils. Now this was to compound contraries; it was by no means consistent. Communion with Christ, and communion with devils, could never be had at once. One must be renounced, if the other was maintained. He who held communion with Christ must renounce that with devils; he who held communion with devils must by that very deed renounce communion with Christ. And what a manifest self-contradiction must that man's conduct be that would partake of the Lord's table, and yet partake of the table of demons! God and mammon can never be served together, nor fellowship be at once had with Christ and Satan. Those who communicate with devils must virtually renounce Christ. This may also intimate that such as indulge themselves in gluttony or drunkenness, and by so doing make their own table the table of devils, or keep up fellowship with Satan by a course of known and wilful wickedness, cannot partake truly of the cup and table of the Lord. They may use the sign, but do not the thing signified thereby. For a man can never be at once in communication with Christ and his church and yet in fellowship with Satan. Note, How much reason have we to look to it that every sin and idol be renounced by us, when we eat and drink at the Lord's table.
V.He warns them, upon the whole, against such idolatry, by signifying to them that God is a jealous God (1 Corinthians 10:22):
Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than he? It is very probable that many among the Corinthians made light of being at these heathen feasts, and thought there was no harm in it. But the apostle bids them beware. The reason with which the second commandment is enforced is, I am a jealous God. God cannot endure a rival in matter of worship; nor give his glory, nor suffer it to be given, to another. Those who have fellowship with other gods provoke him to jealousy, Deuteronomy 32:16. And, before this be done, persons should consider whether they are stronger than he. It is a dangerous thing to provoke God's anger, unless we could withstand his power. But who can stand before him when he is angry? Nahum 1:6. This should be considered by all who continue in the love and liking of sin, and in league with it, while yet they profess to keep up communion with Christ. Is not this the way to provoke his jealousy and indignation? Note, Attention to the greatness of God's power should restrain us from provoking his jealousy, from doing any thing to displease him. Shall we rouse almighty wrath? And how shall we withstand it? Are we a match for God? Can we resist his power, or control it? And, if not, shall we arm it against us, by provoking him to jealousy? No, let us fear his power, and let this restrain us from all provocation.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
"I speak as to wise men: judge ye what I say."
Because he hath cried out aloud and heightened the accusation, calling it idolatry; that he might not seem to exasperate them and to make his speech disgusting, in what follows he refers the decision to them, and sets his judges down on their tribunal with an encomium. "For I speak as to wise men," saith he: which is the mark of one very confident of his own rights, that he should make the accused himself the judge of his allegations.
Thus also he more elevates the hearer, when he discourses not as commanding nor as laying down the law, but as advising with them and as actually pleading before them. For with the Jews, as more foolishly and childishly disposed, God did not so discourse, nor did He in every instance acquaint them with the reasons of the commands, but merely enjoined them; but here, because we have the privilege of great liberty, we are even admitted to be counsellors. And he discourses as with friends, and says, "I need no other judges, do ye yourselves pass this sentence upon me, I take you for arbiters."
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 10:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Paul speaks to the Corinthians as people of sound understanding and asks them to weigh his argument and judge it for themselves.
“I speak as to wise men;”
A compliment with a challenge in it, since some of them were acting unwisely. Paul treats them as able to see the truth he is about to set out.
“judge ye what I say.”
An imperative. To judge here is to discern: to weigh his words, test them and come to a sound conclusion.
Passage study1 Corinthians 10:14–22
One Cup, One Table, One Lord
Summary
Paul brings the warnings of Israel’s wilderness years to a point: “Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.” He asks the Corinthians to weigh his reasoning for themselves, and then he reasons from the Lord’s Supper. When we bless the cup and break the bread, we share in the blood and body of Christ, and all of us who eat that one bread are one body. Israel’s worshippers who ate from the sacrifices shared in the altar in the same way. An idol is only an image, but the sacrifices of the Gentiles go to devils, so a believer who eats at an idol’s feast becomes a partner with them. The cup of the Lord and the cup of devils exclude each other, and the Lord who gave himself for us is jealous for his people and far stronger than we are.
Why Paul tells us to flee from idolatry
The command in verse 14 rests on everything before it. Dióper, “wherefore”, means “on which very account”, and the account is the history Paul has just told in 1 Corinthians 10:1–13. Israel was baptized in the cloud and the sea and ate spiritual food and drank spiritual drink, yet the people fell in the wilderness through idolatry, sexual immorality, tempting Christ and grumbling, and God judged them. Paul sets their story before the Corinthians as a warning, and because it happened, they are to flee.
He gives the command tenderly. “My dearly beloved” joins moû, “of me, my”, to agapētós, “beloved, dear”, one who is loved. Paul writes as a spiritual father to children he loves, and his love is the reason for the urgency.
Pheúgō means to run away, flee, shun or escape, and with apó, “from”, it speaks of leaving a danger behind. Paul gives it as a present imperative, which carries the sense of a standing habit: keep fleeing. People ask why he uses so strong a word. He uses the word for escaping danger because idolatry had brought death to Israel and was a matter of spiritual life and death in Corinth too, and the only safe distance from it is a wide one.
Eidōlolatreía, idolatry, joins the word for an idol to the word for worship or service, so it means idol-worship. Corinth was a wealthy port city with temples to gods such as Aphrodite, Apollo, Poseidon and Asclepius, and its religious festivals, civic banquets and guild dinners often served meat that had been sacrificed to an idol. For new converts these meals were bound up with friendship, business and standing in the city, and the pressure to keep going to them was strong. Paul had already written about such food in 1 Corinthians 8, where his concern was the conscience of the weaker brother, and in 1 Corinthians 9 he showed how he gives up his own rights for the gospel. In 1 Corinthians 10 he speaks of the danger in the worship itself. The whole of 1 Corinthians 8–10 is one argument about these meals.
Behind the command stands the first commandment (Exodus 20:3–5) and the call to love the LORD our God, who is one (Deuteronomy 6:4–5): God alone is to be worshipped. So idolatry also reaches anything that takes God’s place in our trust and devotion, such as money, career, comfort, status or self. Paul names covetousness as idolatry in Colossians 3:5, and John gives the same charge as Paul when he writes, “keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21).
Why Paul calls the Corinthians wise men
Before he makes his case, Paul asks for their verdict: “I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say.” Légō, speak, means to relate in words, and here it opens a reasoned argument. Phrónimos, wise, means thoughtful, sensible or discreet. Greek has other words for learned wisdom (sophos) and for intelligence (synetos), and Paul uses this one, the wisdom of practical understanding that makes sound choices in real situations. Krínō, judge, means to distinguish and so to decide. Paul asks them to weigh his words and reach a right conclusion, confident that if they do, they will agree with him.
This is striking in a letter that has rebuked the Corinthians for worldly wisdom and for their divisions (1 Corinthians 1:18–31, 1 Corinthians 3:1–4). Paul calls them wise because of what they should be as believers, who have received the Spirit that searches the deep things of God (1 Corinthians 2:10–16). The word is a compliment and a challenge at once, and it tells us that what follows is plain enough for anyone with spiritual sense to see.
Scripture asks this discernment of every believer. The mature are trained to discern good and evil (Hebrews 5:14), Paul prays that love may abound in knowledge and discernment (Philippians 1:9–10), and John tells us to try the spirits (1 John 4:1). Our wisdom comes from Christ, who is “the power of God, and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24) and in whom “are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3), and the Spirit is the Spirit of wisdom and revelation (Ephesians 1:17). The same wisdom governs how we use our liberty, so that it never becomes a stumblingblock to a weaker brother (1 Corinthians 8:9).
What the cup and the bread are
Paul begins from something the Corinthians already know, the Lord’s Supper, and asks two questions that expect the answer yes. “The cup of blessing which we bless” is the cup over which thanks and blessing are spoken. Eulogía, blessing, comes from the same root as the verb to bless and means fine speaking or praise, and so a blessing or consecration. The phrase echoes the Passover meal, at which a cup was blessed, often reckoned as the third cup. On the night he was betrayed, Jesus took bread and called it his body and took the cup and called it his blood of the covenant (Matthew 26:26–28). Luke records his words, “This cup is the new testament in my blood” (Luke 22:19–20).
Koinōnía, communion, means partnership, participation, fellowship and sharing. The cup is a sharing in the blood of Christ, and the bread is a sharing in his body. When we drink and eat, we take part in his sacrifice and receive what it won: forgiveness, reconciliation with God and a place in the new covenant made in his blood. Among the Gentiles of Corinth a common meal also marked a shared bond with a god or a group, so the Corinthians understood the word, and Paul builds the rest of his argument on it.
Kláō is the verb used for breaking bread. “The bread which we break” repeats what Jesus did when he gave the bread to his disciples, and the broken loaf sets his body, given for us, before our eyes. Jesus spoke of eating his flesh and drinking his blood as the way to life (John 6:53–56). The Supper looks back to the cross, it looks up to the risen Christ at the right hand of God, who intercedes for us (Romans 8:34), and it looks forward to the marriage supper of the Lamb (Revelation 19:9). Because it is a real sharing in Christ, Paul later warns against eating and drinking unworthily (1 Corinthians 11:27–32).
How is Christ present in the bread and the cup?
The verse calls the cup and the bread a communion of Christ’s blood and body, and it leaves the manner of his presence unstated, so believers who agree that this sharing is real differ on how it happens. Some believers hold that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ. Some hold that his body and blood are truly present in, with and under the bread and wine. Some hold that Christ is present by his Spirit and feeds with himself those who receive the bread and cup in faith. Some hold that the Supper is a memorial, in which we share by faith in his finished work as we remember him. On every one of these readings Paul’s point in this chapter stands: the Lord’s table joins those who eat at it to Christ.
How many believers become one body
Verse 17 gives the second gift of the Supper: “For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.” Ártos is bread, a loaf, here the one loaf of the Supper. Heîs, one, is the simple numeral, and Paul sets it beside both the bread and the body. Metéchō, partake, is made from “with” and “to have”, and means to share or take part, and by implication to eat or drink. Since we all share the one loaf, we who are many are one body, and the words “one bread” stand twice in the verse to press the point.
A loaf is made from many grains of wheat ground and baked together, and the picture fits the church: many people from many backgrounds made one in Christ. The unity comes from sharing in him, so it is his work, and the Supper both shows it and strengthens it.
This is Paul’s teaching on the church as the body of Christ, which he sets out at length in 1 Corinthians 12 and in Romans 12.
The body has many members and one life (Romans 12:4–5), and by one Spirit we are all baptized into it, whether Jews or Gentiles, bond or free (1 Corinthians 12:12–27). There is one body and one Spirit, one Lord, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:4–6), and in Christ, Jew and Greek, bond and free, male and female are all one (Galatians 3:28). Christ is the bread of life (John 6:35), who gave his flesh for the life of the world (John 6:51) and broke down the wall that divided people from one another (Ephesians 2:14).
The Corinthians needed this badly. They had split into factions behind different leaders (1 Corinthians 1:10–13), and they were divided by social rank even at the Supper (1 Corinthians 11:17–22). The Lord’s table made them one, and the idol’s table offered a fellowship of its own that could only pull them apart.
What Israel’s altar shows about a sacrificial meal
Paul turns next to Israel. “Israel after the flesh” means the nation by natural descent from Jacob, and sárx, flesh, speaks here of that physical lineage. When an Israelite brought a peace offering, part of the animal was burned on the altar for God, part went to the priests, and the worshipper and his family ate the rest (Leviticus 7:11–34). Esthíō is the plain verb “to eat”. Thysiastḗrion is the altar, the place of sacrifice, and koinōnós, partaker, means a sharer, an associate or a companion.
So those who ate the sacrifice shared in the altar, and through it in fellowship with the LORD, who received his portion there. The question expects the answer yes, and it lays down the principle for the verses that follow: a sacrificial meal joins the one who eats it to the one to whom the sacrifice is offered. That holds at the Lord’s table, and it holds at a pagan altar.
Israel’s sacrifices were offered again and again. Christ, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), offered himself once for all (Hebrews 9:26–28), and he is both the sacrifice and our great High Priest (Hebrews 4:14–16). At his table we share in him.
Is an idol anything?
An idol is an image made by hands, and Paul still holds what he wrote in 1 Corinthians 8:4, that “an idol is nothing in the world”. Eídōlon means an image made for worship, and so a heathen god or idol. Eidōlóthyton, “that which is offered in sacrifice to idols”, is a compound meaning something sacrificed to an image, the meat or other food from a pagan offering. “What say I then?” opens a clarification, and the question asks whether either one estí tìs, “is any thing”. Tìs is the indefinite pronoun “some” or “any”, and estí is simply “is”. The expected answer is that the image and the meat have no power or godhead of their own.
People ask whether Paul now contradicts what he wrote in chapter 8. He holds two truths together: the image is a lifeless object, and the worship offered to it is real worship that reaches real spirits. Verse 20 says where it goes: “the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God.”
Éthnos means a nation or people, and in its extended sense the Gentiles, the nations outside Israel who worshipped many gods. Thýō, sacrifice, means to slaughter or offer in sacrifice, often by fire, the central act of their worship. The word the KJV renders “devils” is daimónion, a demon. In form it is a neuter word drawn from daimōn, and the pagans could use it of a lesser god. Scripture uses it of the many evil spirits, a word set apart from diabolos, the devil himself. Behind the carved gods of Corinth stood real spiritual powers hostile to God.
Moses said the same of Israel: “They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not” (Deuteronomy 32:17). The psalmist says that Israel “sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils” (Psalm 106:37), and Revelation joins the worship of devils with “idols of gold, and silver, and of brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk” (Revelation 9:20).
Then Paul says, “and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.” The word for fellowship is koinōnós again, the sharer or partner of verse 18. Since a sacrifice joins those who eat it to the one who receives it, the pagan feast made its guests partners of devils, and Paul wants his beloved kept far from that.
Are all who worship false gods worshipping devils?
Paul is speaking of what the act of sacrifice to false gods is, whatever the worshipper intends. A worshipper at a Corinthian altar may have had no thought of demons, yet the offering itself joined him to the powers behind the idol and set him against the one true God. That is why Scripture treats false worship so gravely, and why the first commandment stands where it does at the head of the law.
Why no one can share both tables
Verse 21 states the conclusion, first of the cup and then of the table. Dýnamai means to be able, and with the negative ou it says “you are not able”. Paul describes a real impossibility. Whoever drinks the cup of the Lord shares in Christ’s blood, whoever drinks at the idol’s feast shares with devils, and those two fellowships exclude each other. In Scripture a cup can stand for a person’s portion, and the cup of devils was the wine poured out and drunk at the pagan sacrificial meal. “The Lord’s table” is the Supper, and “the table of devils” is the meal eaten in a temple or a home in honour of an idol. Metéchō, partake, is the verb of verse 17 again, to share and to have a part.
Jesus said, “No man can serve two masters” (Matthew 6:24). Joshua told Israel, “choose you this day whom ye will serve” (Joshua 24:15), and Paul warns the Corinthians in his second letter against being unequally yoked with unbelievers (2 Corinthians 6:14–16). Israel tried to keep both at the golden calf (1 Corinthians 10:7), and it ended in judgment. The Lord’s Supper marks our covenant with God, and that covenant is exclusive.
May a Christian eat food that was offered to an idol?
Paul’s concern in verse 21 is taking part in the sacrificial feast itself, and a few verses later he lets believers eat meat bought in the market or served at an unbeliever’s table, “asking no question for conscience sake” (1 Corinthians 10:25–27). The question that decides it is whether eating is a share in an idol’s worship, or would cause a weaker brother to stumble. The origin of the meat by itself settles neither. Paul goes on, “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient”, and each of us is to seek another’s good (1 Corinthians 10:23–24).
Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy?
Paul closes with two questions that answer themselves. Parazēlóō means to stir to jealousy or rivalry, and to provoke the Lord to jealousy is to give to another the worship that belongs to him alone. His jealousy is holy zeal for his own glory and for the whole devotion of his people, and idolatry among them is spiritual adultery, a betrayal of the covenant. Moses speaks of this jealousy in Deuteronomy 32:21, a few verses after the sacrifices to devils. The LORD is a jealous God (Deuteronomy 6:15), Israel provoked him to jealousy (Psalm 78:58), and Nahum says that God is jealous and avenging (Nahum 1:2).
Kýrios, Lord, is the title of one supreme in authority, a master, and in this passage it is the Lord whose cup and table Paul has just named, the Lord Jesus Christ. To provoke the Son is to provoke the Father, for Jesus said, “I and my Father are one” (John 10:30).
Ischyrós, stronger, means strong, mighty or powerful. “Are we stronger than he?” exposes the presumption behind every compromise, as if we could keep company with idols and still stand against God’s judgment. Israel’s fall in the wilderness has already shown the answer. Christ was declared to be the Son of God with power by his resurrection (Romans 1:4), and all power in heaven and in earth is given to him (Matthew 28:18).
Christ, who frees us from idols
The Lord of this table is the one who makes the flight from idols possible. He is “the image of the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15), by whom “all things were created” and in whom all things hold together (Colossians 1:16–17). At the cross he triumphed over the principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15), and by his death he overcame the devil and freed those who were held in bondage (Hebrews 2:14–15). God has raised him above every rule and power (Ephesians 1:20–22). He is the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6), and through him we have fellowship with the Father and with his Son (1 John 1:3). We are bought with a price (1 Corinthians 6:20), redeemed with the precious blood of Christ (1 Peter 1:18–19), so that we belong to him. Fleeing from idols is also running to him, as the Thessalonians turned to God from idols “to serve the living and true God” (1 Thessalonians 1:9–10).
What the Lord’s table gives us
The Lord’s Supper gives us a real share in the blood and body of Christ, and with it a place in one body with every believer who eats the one bread. That is why Paul can speak so plainly about the idol’s feast: we already have a table, and the Lord himself is its host. His command to flee comes from an apostle who calls us dearly beloved, and it rests on a God who is jealous for us because we are his. In these verses God shows himself as the one Lord who will share his people with no rival, and as stronger than every power that hides behind an idol. Each time the cup is blessed and the bread is broken, his people are shown again whose they are.
1 Corinthians 10:14
“Wherefore,”
The command follows from Israel’s story in the verses just before. The word means “on which very account”.
“my dearly beloved,”
The warning comes wrapped in affection. Paul gives it out of love for them and a wish to keep them from harm.
“flee from idolatry.”
Run, and keep running. The danger stood in every street of Corinth, in its temples and its feasts.
1 Corinthians 10:15 This verse
“I speak as to wise men;”
A compliment with a challenge in it, since some of them were acting unwisely. Paul treats them as able to see the truth he is about to set out.
“judge ye what I say.”
An imperative. To judge here is to discern: to weigh his words, test them and come to a sound conclusion.
1 Corinthians 10:16
“The cup of blessing which we bless,”
The cup over which the church gives thanks, set apart for the Supper.
“is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?”
The question expects yes. To drink is to share in the blood by which the new covenant was made.
“The bread which we break,”
The church breaks the bread as Jesus did when he gave it.
“is it not the communion of the body of Christ?”
The second question matches the first, and together the cup and the bread set forth the whole of his sacrifice.
1 Corinthians 10:17
“For we being many”
Many in number and different in background, rank and history.
“are one bread, and one body:”
Paul moves from the loaf to the church, and the unity of the one is the unity of the other.
“for we are all partakers of that one bread.”
The reason for the unity is the shared eating, and “all” leaves out no believer at the table.
1 Corinthians 10:18
“Behold Israel after the flesh:”
Look at Israel, the nation descended from Jacob, an example every reader of the Old Testament knew.
“are not they which eat of the sacrifices”
The worshippers who ate their share of the peace offerings, as the law of Moses directed.
“partakers of the altar?”
The altar stands for the God who received the sacrifice on it, so eating there was fellowship with him.
1 Corinthians 10:19
“What say I then?”
A turn in the argument to head off a misunderstanding.
“that the idol is any thing,”
Paul still holds that the image is no god and has no power of its own.
“or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing?”
The meat itself is ordinary food, unchanged by having been offered.
1 Corinthians 10:20
“But I say,”
A firm statement that answers the question of verse 19.
“that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice,”
Public sacrifices in the temples, private rites in the home, and offerings at civic and guild feasts.
“they sacrifice to devils, and not to God:”
The true receivers of pagan worship are demons, whatever names the worshippers give their gods.
“and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.”
Paul’s wish is also a prohibition: a pagan sacrificial meal would make them partners with demons.
1 Corinthians 10:21
“Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils:”
The cup of the Lord is the cup of blessing of verse 16. The cup of devils is the drink poured and shared at an idol’s feast.
“ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils.”
Two tables mean two fellowships, and a believer belongs to one only.
1 Corinthians 10:22
“Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy?”
The question looks back to Israel, who provoked God in the wilderness with idols and fell under his judgment.
“are we stronger than he?”
The question expects the answer that we are weak and he is mighty, and that to defy him is folly.
Last revised