Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Mikloth begat Shimeah. And these also dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem, over against them.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Mikloth H4732 begat H3205 Shimeah H8039. And these also H637 dwelt H3427 with their brethren H251 in Jerusalem H3389, over against them H5048.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Miklot fathered Shim'ah. In contrast with some of their kinsmen, they and their families lived in Yerushalayim.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and Mikloth, who was the father of Shimeah. These also lived alongside their relatives in Jerusalem.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Mikloth begat Shimeah. And they also dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem, over against their brethren.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Mikloth became the father of Shimeah. They also lived with their brothers in Jerusalem, over against their brothers.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Mikloth begate Shimeah: these also dwelt with their brethren in Ierusalem, euen by their brethren.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Mikloth begat Shimeah. And they also over-against their brethren dwelt in Jerusalem with their brethren.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,608 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:32 is a concise yet profoundly significant verse embedded within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Benjamin. It meticulously traces the lineage of Mikloth and Shimeah, but more importantly, it underscores the re-establishment and communal dwelling of these descendants with their brethren in Jerusalem. This verse, situated within the broader historical context of post-exilic restoration, subtly emphasizes the enduring continuity of God's covenant people and highlights the critical importance of Jerusalem as the spiritual and national center for a renewed community.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 8:32 is positioned deep within a lengthy and highly detailed genealogy of the tribe of Benjamin, which commences in 1 Chronicles 8:1 and extends through 1 Chronicles 8:40. This chapter meticulously enumerates various branches of Benjamin's family, frequently emphasizing those who settled in Jerusalem or held positions of prominence. The preceding verses, specifically 1 Chronicles 8:29-31, detail the lineage of Jeiel, identified as the "father of Gibeon," and his descendants, many of whom were also recorded as dwelling in Jerusalem. Verse 32 seamlessly continues this pattern, introducing another specific familial line—that of Mikloth and Shimeah—and reiterating their presence in the capital. This repetition reinforces the overarching theme of the re-population and re-establishment of Jerusalem, demonstrating the chronicler's systematic approach to connecting the post-exilic community with their historical roots and tribal inheritance. The flow is a deliberate, exhaustive enumeration designed to validate the identity and claims of the returned exiles.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely compiled during the post-exilic period, roughly between 450-400 BC, following the return of the Jewish people from their Babylonian captivity. For a community grappling with the profound questions of identity, legitimate land ownership, and the rightful succession of leadership, detailed genealogies were not merely historical curiosities; they were indispensable legal and social documents. These records served to affirm tribal affiliations, validate claims to ancestral lands, and confirm the appropriate lineage for priestly and royal roles within the re-forming nation. The mention of "Jerusalem" in this era carries immense symbolic and practical weight; the city had been utterly devastated by Babylon and was undergoing a painstaking process of reconstruction and re-fortification, as vividly described in books like Nehemiah. The return and resettlement of various tribal groups, including Benjamin, in Jerusalem was absolutely crucial for the spiritual, political, and demographic restoration of the nation. Culturally, lineage was paramount, dictating social status, inheritance rights, and one's integral place within the covenant community. The phrase "dwelt with their brethren" powerfully highlights the communal imperative and the re-formation of a cohesive society in the rebuilt capital, emphasizing unity and shared purpose.

  • Key Themes: This verse, though a single entry in a vast genealogical record, contributes significantly to several overarching theological and narrative themes prevalent throughout 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully underscores the Continuity of God's Covenant People, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving a remnant and maintaining their historical identity despite the devastating experiences of exile and dispersion. This theme is echoed in the New Testament, reminding us that God has not abandoned His people, as seen in Romans 11:5. Secondly, it emphasizes the Importance of Lineage and Heritage, not merely as a dry historical record, but as a living foundation for national and spiritual identity, connecting the present community to the sacred promises made to their ancestors. This genealogical emphasis culminates in the tracing of the Messiah's lineage. Thirdly, the repeated mention of dwelling in Jerusalem highlights the Restoration and Centrality of Jerusalem as the spiritual and political heart of the nation. It was the divinely chosen place where God's people were to gather, live in community, and worship, reflecting the broader prophetic hope for the city's renewal and glory found in passages like Isaiah 62:7.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Begat (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): This verb (H3205) is a fundamental term in biblical genealogies, literally meaning "to bear young" or "to bring forth." In the Hiphil stem, as used here, it specifically signifies "to beget" or "to father." Its consistent application throughout the genealogies of Chronicles underscores the direct lineal descent and the meticulous tracking of family lines, affirming the continuity of generations and the preservation of specific family branches within the larger tribal structure. It is a foundational term for establishing identity, inheritance, and the fulfillment of covenant promises through successive generations.
  • Dwelt (Hebrew, yâshab', H3427): This verb (H3427) fundamentally means "to sit down," "to remain," or "to inhabit." In the context of 1 Chronicles 8:32, it denotes permanent settlement and established residence. The act of "dwelling" in Jerusalem signifies not merely a temporary stay but a deliberate and successful re-establishment of a stable community. For the post-exilic community, this word carries immense weight, indicating the successful return and re-population of the land and, specifically, the capital city, thereby fulfilling the promises of restoration and divine blessing.
  • Over against them (Hebrew, neged', H5048): This term (H5048) serves as the root for the prepositional phrase "over against them" (לְעֻמָּתָם, le'ummatam). It means "a front," "part opposite," or "a counterpart." When used adverbially with a preposition, as here, it conveys the sense of "over against" or "before," suggesting proximity, direct relation, or a structured arrangement. In this verse, it implies that these descendants of Mikloth and Shimeah were settled in a specific area of Jerusalem, perhaps in a designated quarter or in close proximity to other family groups or clans of their brethren. It paints a vivid picture of an organized, re-established community rather than a scattered population, highlighting the intentionality of the resettlement.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Mikloth begat Shimeah.": This opening clause presents a direct lineal connection, establishing a specific father-son relationship within the broader Benjaminite genealogy. It is a typical, formulaic expression found consistently throughout biblical genealogies, serving to trace and validate the family tree. The names themselves, while not carrying explicit theological meaning in this immediate context, are part of the meticulous record-keeping that was absolutely vital for the post-exilic community to re-establish their identity, tribal claims, and communal structure.
  • "And these also dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem,": This part of the verse expands beyond mere lineage to describe the geographical and communal reality of these descendants. The phrase "And these also" refers to the descendants of Mikloth and Shimeah, indicating that they, like other Benjaminite families mentioned previously in the chapter, were an integral part of the re-population effort in Jerusalem. The crucial phrase "with their brethren" emphasizes the communal aspect, highlighting that they were not isolated individuals but were integrated into the larger Israelite community, specifically their fellow tribesmen, in the capital city. This speaks to the re-formation of a cohesive society.
  • "over against them.": This final phrase provides a crucial spatial detail, suggesting a specific arrangement within Jerusalem. As explored in the key word analysis, "over against them" implies proximity, perhaps indicating that they settled in a designated area or in direct relation to other family groups or clans. It reinforces the idea of an organized, cohesive community settling back into the city, with families and clans maintaining a structured and intentional presence. This detail contributes to the overall picture of a nation actively rebuilding and re-establishing its societal fabric and communal life.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:32, and indeed throughout much of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a purposeful literary structure designed to establish historical continuity, affirm identity, and validate claims to land and status for the post-exilic community. The repetitive formula of "begat" is a form of Anaphora or Repetition, which serves to reinforce the lineal progression and the meticulous nature of the record, emphasizing the unbroken chain of generations. The inclusion of specific details like "dwelt with their brethren in Jerusalem, over against them" adds a layer of Descriptive Detail that grounds the abstract genealogical data in a concrete historical and geographical reality, emphasizing the re-establishment of a communal life in the capital. The verse also functions as a form of Historical Record, preserving the memory and identity of specific families within the larger narrative of Israel's restoration.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 8:32, though seemingly a simple genealogical entry, powerfully illustrates God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, particularly in preserving a remnant of His people and ensuring their return to the land and the capital city. The meticulous record-keeping reflects a divine care for the continuity of His chosen nation, even through periods of judgment and exile. It underscores the theological truth that God's plans are not thwarted by human failure or historical upheaval; rather, He sovereignly works through generations to fulfill His redemptive purposes. The re-establishment in Jerusalem signifies the renewal of hope and the re-centering of worship and national life around the city of David, a crucial step in the unfolding of God's redemptive history and the preparation for the coming Messiah. This commitment to lineage also foreshadows the importance of a pure and verifiable line for the ultimate Seed.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While genealogies can often feel distant or dry, 1 Chronicles 8:32 invites us to reflect on the profound significance of our own heritage, both physical and, more importantly, spiritual. Just as the ancient Israelites deeply valued their connection to their ancestors and their tribal identity, we are called to appreciate our place within the larger, unfolding story of God's people—the Church. This verse serves as a powerful reminder that God is faithful across generations, meticulously preserving His people and working out His purposes through the long arc of history. It encourages us to consider how we, like Mikloth and Shimeah's descendants, are called to dwell "with our brethren"—to live in intentional, supportive, and active community, building up one another in the spiritual "Jerusalem" that is the body of Christ. Our individual lives are not isolated but are intricately woven into a grand tapestry of divine faithfulness, calling us to contribute to the health, vitality, and mission of our spiritual homes and to remember that we are part of something infinitely larger and more enduring than ourselves.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the continuity of God's people through genealogies like this one deepen your appreciation for God's unwavering faithfulness across generations?
  • In what practical ways do you see the importance of "dwelling with your brethren" (living in intentional Christian community) manifest in your own life and faith journey today?
  • What aspects of your personal or spiritual heritage do you value most, and how do they connect you to God's larger redemptive story in the world?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in books like 1 Chronicles, and what is their relevance for us today?

Answer: Genealogies were critically important for the ancient Israelites, especially after the Babylonian exile, for several profound reasons. They served to re-establish national and tribal identity, confirm legitimate land rights, validate claims to priestly and royal lineages, and, most significantly, demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His covenant people despite their failures and the devastating experience of exile. For the post-exilic community, these meticulous records provided a tangible, irrefutable link to their past, assuring them they were indeed the rightful descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and thus legitimate heirs to God's promises. For us today, while we no longer rely on physical genealogies for land rights or priestly duties, they serve as powerful theological statements. They underscore God's meticulous care for history, His unwavering commitment to His promises across countless generations, and His sovereign hand in preserving a remnant. Furthermore, they highlight the human lineage through which the Messiah would eventually come, directly connecting the Old Testament narrative to the New Testament fulfillment in Jesus Christ, as seen in the opening of the Gospels (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:32 is a specific genealogical entry within the history of Benjamin, it finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in several profound and interconnected ways. The meticulous preservation of lineages, culminating in the re-establishment of families in Jerusalem, points forward to the perfect and divinely ordained lineage of Jesus Christ, who is the true Son of David and the rightful heir to the eternal throne, as affirmed in passages like Matthew 1:1 and Luke 3:23-38. Just as these Benjaminite families returned to dwell in a rebuilt Jerusalem, Christ is the one who establishes the New Jerusalem, the heavenly city where all God's redeemed people, gathered from every tribe and nation, will dwell with Him eternally in perfect peace and communion (Revelation 21:2). Furthermore, the emphasis on "dwelling with their brethren" foreshadows the ultimate unity and spiritual community found in Christ's body, the Church, where believers from diverse backgrounds are brought together as one family, fellow citizens with the saints, under the headship of Christ (Ephesians 2:19-22). Jesus is the ultimate "brother" who gathers His people, not just in a physical city, but into a spiritual kingdom where true belonging, eternal life, and perfect fellowship are found.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.