Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Ulla; Arah, and Haniel, and Rezia.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Ulla H5925; Arah H733, and Haniel H2592, and Rezia H7525.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of 'Ula were: Arach, Hani'el and Ritzya.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Ulla: Arah, Hanniel, and Rizia.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Ulla: Arah, and Hanniel, and Rizia.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Ulla: Arah, and Hanniel, and Rizia.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Vlla, Harah, and Haniel, and Rizia.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Ulla: Arah, and Hanniel, and Rezia.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,575 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:39 is a succinct genealogical entry within the extensive tribal registers of the book of 1 Chronicles, specifically detailing three sons—Arah, Haniel, and Rezia—descended from Ulla within the tribe of Asher. This seemingly brief verse serves as a profound testament to the Chronicler's meticulous preservation of Israel's tribal heritage, underscoring the enduring importance of lineage for identity, land rights, and the continuity of God's covenant people in the post-exilic community. It subtly highlights the divine valuing of every individual, even those without an accompanying narrative.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Chronicles commences with a sweeping genealogical record spanning the first nine chapters, meticulously tracing the lineage of Israel from Adam through the various tribes. This foundational section establishes the historical continuity and identity of God's people, grounding their existence in a divinely ordained heritage. Chapter 7 specifically delineates the genealogies of several northern tribes: Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. Verse 39 concludes a detailed segment focusing on the descendants of Asher, following a list of other prominent families and individuals within that tribe, as seen in 1 Chronicles 7:30-38. The inclusion of Ulla and his sons—Arah, Haniel, and Rezia—at this point underscores the Chronicler's commitment to completeness, affirming the intricate web of relationships that constituted the nation of Israel and their connection to the promises of God. This meticulous record-keeping serves to provide a solid, legitimate foundation for the subsequent narrative of the united monarchy and the temple, emphasizing the unbroken thread of God's covenant with His chosen people.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The genealogies in 1 Chronicles were compiled in the post-exilic period, after the return of the Jewish people from Babylonian captivity. For this community, establishing clear tribal affiliations, land rights, and priestly lineages was paramount for rebuilding their society, re-establishing their identity as the covenant people of God, and properly organizing temple service. Without these authoritative records, the returned exiles would struggle to claim their ancestral lands, define their social structures, or legitimize their roles within the community. The meticulous detail, even for seemingly minor figures like Ulla's sons, reflects the critical need for an accurate and authoritative record to legitimize claims and reinforce communal identity in a disrupted society. In ancient Israelite society, one's lineage determined social status, inheritance, and often one's role in the community, making these lists far more than mere names; they were foundational documents for national and individual existence. The preservation of these records despite the upheaval of exile speaks to a profound cultural and theological commitment to heritage and divine continuity.
  • Key Themes: This verse, as part of the broader genealogies, contributes to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it highlights the importance of lineage and identity, demonstrating how an individual's place within the tribal structure was fundamental to their self-understanding and communal belonging. These lists connected the present generation to their historical roots and the divine promises made to their ancestors, such as those found in God's covenant with Abraham. Secondly, the meticulous detail, even for less prominent figures, speaks to God's meticulous care and comprehensive knowledge of every individual within His people. It suggests that even the seemingly "ordinary" are significant in God's grand plan, reflecting the divine gaze that sees and values every life, as echoed in Psalm 139:16. Finally, the preservation of these records across generations, despite periods of apostasy and exile, powerfully illustrates the continuity of God's covenant faithfulness. It affirms that God's promises to Israel endured, and His people, though scattered, remained distinct and connected to their heritage, demonstrating His unwavering commitment to His chosen people, a theme also central to Deuteronomy 7:9.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This word (H1121) denotes a son, but carries a broader meaning of one who builds or continues the family name. In the context of genealogies, "sons" signifies not just biological offspring but the foundational units through which lineage is established, tribal identity is maintained, and the covenant promises are passed down. The inclusion of "sons" underscores the patrilineal structure of Israelite society and the vital role of male descendants in preserving family and tribal continuity.
  • Haniel (Hebrew, Channîyʼêl, H2592): This name (H2592) literally translates to "favor of God" or "God is gracious." While 1 Chronicles 7:39 provides no narrative for Haniel, the very meaning of his name serves as a subtle theological statement embedded within the genealogy. It reminds the reader that even in the seemingly mundane listing of names, there is an underlying acknowledgment of divine favor and benevolence. The presence of such a name within the sacred record suggests that God's grace is a pervasive reality, touching even those whose lives are not extensively detailed in the biblical narrative, affirming His character as a gracious and benevolent God.
  • Rezia (Hebrew, Ritsyâʼ, H7525): This name (H7525) is derived from a root meaning "delight" or "pleasure." Similar to Haniel, the meaning of Rezia's name is not explicitly tied to his life story in the text. However, its inclusion, alongside names like "grace of God," paints a picture of a community where names carried intrinsic meaning, often reflecting positive attributes or divine blessings. The presence of such a name, even for an otherwise unmentioned individual, suggests a hope or a characteristic valued by his parents, and by extension, a subtle affirmation of the goodness and delight found within God's covenant people.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Ulla;": This opening phrase immediately establishes the patrilineal descent, a standard and crucial convention in biblical genealogies. "Ulla" serves as the immediate patriarch, linking his sons to the broader lineage of Asher. This structure reinforces the tribal and familial organization that was paramount for Israelite identity and societal structure, ensuring that each individual's place within the collective was clearly defined and recorded. It signifies the continuation of a specific family line within the larger tapestry of the tribe.
  • "Arah, and Haniel, and Rezia.": This is a straightforward enumeration of Ulla's three sons. The simple listing emphasizes the fact of their existence and their inclusion in the divinely preserved record of Israel's families. While no deeds or specific roles are attributed to them, their very presence in this sacred text signifies their importance within the lineage and, by extension, within God's overarching plan for His people. The repeated use of the conjunction "and" links each name, creating a sense of continuity, completeness, and equal standing within this particular familial branch, solidifying their place in the tribal register.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:39, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy itself. This is not merely a list of names but a structured literary form with specific theological and historical purposes: to establish historical continuity, confirm tribal identity, legitimize claims to land and office, and underscore God's faithfulness to His covenant promises across generations. The use of Listing is evident in the simple enumeration of names, which serves to systematically record and preserve the tribal data. While seemingly dry to a modern reader, this repetitive listing creates a sense of comprehensive inclusion, implying that every family and individual, no matter how minor their historical role, is accounted for in God's divine record. Furthermore, the very act of Inclusion of these seemingly obscure names highlights a profound theological point: God's meticulous attention to detail and His valuing of every individual within His covenant community, even those who do not achieve fame or prominence, thereby underscoring His comprehensive knowledge and care for His people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:39, though a simple genealogical entry, profoundly connects to the broader biblical narrative of God's covenant faithfulness and His intimate knowledge of His people. The meticulous recording of names, even those without an accompanying narrative, underscores the divine principle that every individual life holds significance in God's eyes. This verse affirms that God remembers and values each person within His grand redemptive story, a truth that extends far beyond ancient Israel. It speaks to the comprehensive nature of God's care, where no one is overlooked or forgotten, and His promises are sustained through generations, regardless of human failings or historical upheaval. This continuity of lineage serves as a tangible reminder of God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people, ensuring their identity and heritage endure as part of His ongoing plan of salvation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world that often values fame, achievement, and public prominence, 1 Chronicles 7:39 offers a quiet but profound counter-narrative. It reminds us that God's economy of value is not based on human metrics of success, visibility, or historical impact. The inclusion of Arah, Haniel, and Rezia—individuals about whom we know nothing else beyond their names and lineage—in the sacred text assures us that every life, every person, every family, and every contribution, no matter how seemingly small or unseen, is known and valued by God. This verse challenges us to appreciate the "unsung heroes" in our own communities and churches, those who faithfully live out their callings without seeking recognition or public acclaim. It also invites us to find deep comfort and security in the knowledge that our own lives, with all their intricate details, quiet moments, and unseen sacrifices, are deeply known, cherished, and accounted for by the Creator. We are not forgotten, but are part of a larger, divinely orchestrated story, connected to a spiritual lineage that spans generations and culminates in Christ, providing us with an enduring identity and purpose.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous record-keeping in genealogies like 1 Chronicles 7:39 challenge your understanding of what God values in a person's life?
  • In what ways might you be an "unsung hero" in your own sphere of influence, and how does this verse encourage you in that role?
  • How does the idea of being "known" by God, even when your story isn't fully told, bring you comfort or challenge in your personal walk of faith?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so long and seemingly tedious to read for a modern audience?

Answer: For the original post-exilic audience, these genealogies were anything but tedious; they were foundational and vital. They served multiple critical purposes: establishing identity and tribal affiliation after the Babylonian exile, legitimizing claims to ancestral land inheritances, confirming priestly and Levitical lineages for temple service, and demonstrating the historical continuity of God's covenant promises to Israel. For a modern reader, while the names may seem obscure, understanding their original function reveals their profound theological and historical significance. They underscore God's faithfulness in preserving His people and His meticulous attention to every detail of their heritage, ultimately pointing to the broader narrative of salvation history that culminates in Christ, whose own lineage is meticulously traced in the Gospels (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17).

What is the significance of individual names in these lists, especially when no story is attached to them?

Answer: Even without accompanying narratives, the individual names in these genealogies carry profound significance. Firstly, their very inclusion signifies that each person was known and valued within God's covenant community; no one was overlooked or forgotten by the divine record-keeper. Secondly, many Hebrew names, like "Haniel" ("grace of God") in this verse, carried inherent meanings that could serve as miniature theological statements or reflections of parental hopes and blessings. While we don't know the specific life circumstances or deeds of Arah, Haniel, or Rezia, their presence in the sacred text affirms God's comprehensive knowledge of all His people. It also reminds us that God's plan unfolds not just through famous heroes but through countless faithful individuals, each playing their part in the grand tapestry of redemptive history, much like the "great cloud of witnesses" described in Hebrews 12:1.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 7:39 is a specific genealogical entry from the Old Testament, its underlying themes find profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The meticulous record-keeping of Israel's lineage, designed to establish identity and continuity, ultimately points to the ultimate Seed of Abraham and Son of David—Jesus Christ. His own genealogies in the New Testament (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38) are crucial for demonstrating His legitimate claim to be the Messiah, the one through whom all God's covenant promises are fulfilled. The idea that every name matters to God, as subtly conveyed in the detailed lists of Chronicles, culminates in Christ, the Good Shepherd who knows each of His sheep by name (John 10:3). Through His atoning work, believers are no longer defined solely by earthly lineage or tribal affiliation but are grafted into the ultimate family of God, becoming children of Abraham by faith (Galatians 3:7) and co-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17). Thus, the ancient records of Israel's families foreshadow the new spiritual family formed through Christ, where every believer's name is written in the Lamb's Book of Life, ensuring an eternal identity and inheritance far surpassing any earthly tribal claim.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:39 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.