TRV
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 1–30
The priests and Levites were more concerned than any other Israelites to preserve their pedigree clear and to be able to prove it, because all the honours and privileges of their office depended upon their descent. And we read of those who, though perhaps they really were children of the priests, yet, because they could not find the register of their genealogies, nor make out their descent by any authentic record, were, as polluted, put from the priesthood, and forbidden to eat of the holy things, Ezr 2:62, Ezr 2:63. It is but very little that is here recorded of the genealogies of this sacred tribe. I. The first fathers of it are here named twice, Ch1 6:1, Ch1 6:16. Gershom, Kohath, and Merari, are three names which we were very conversant with in the book of Numbers, when the families of the Levites were marshalled and had their work assigned to them. Aaron, and Moses, and Miriam, we have known much more of than their names, and cannot pass them over here without remembering that this was that Moses and Aaron whom God honoured in making them instruments of Israel's deliverance and settlement and figures of him that was to come, Moses as a prophet and Aaron as a priest. And the mention of Nadab and Abihu (though, having no children, there was no occasion to bring them into the genealogy) cannot but remind us of the terrors of that divine justice which they were made monuments of for offering strange fire, that we may always fear before him. 2. The line of Eleazar, the successor of Aaron, is here drawn down to the time of the captivity, Ch1 6:4-15. It begins with Eleazar, who came out of the house of bondage in Egypt, and ends with Jehozadak, who went into the house of bondage in Babylon. Thus, for their sins, they were left as they were found, which might also intimate that the Levitical priesthood did not make anything perfect, but this was to be done by the bringing in of a better hope. All these here named were not high priests; for, in the time of the judges, that dignity was, upon some occasion or other, brought into the family of Ithamar, of which Eli was; but in Zadok it returned again to the right line. Of Azariah it is here said (v. 10), He it is that executed the priest's office in the temple that Solomon built. It is supposed that this was that Azariah who bravely opposed the presumption of king Uzziah when he invaded the priest's office (Ch2 26:17, Ch2 26:18), though he ventured his neck by so doing. This was done like a priest, like one that was truly zealous for his God. He that thus boldly maintained and defended the priest's office, and made good its barriers against such a daring insult, might well be said to execute it; and this honour is put upon him for it; while Urijah, one of his successors, for a base compliance with King Ahaz, in building him an idolatrous altar, has the disgrace put upon him of being left out of this genealogy, as perhaps some others are. But some think that this remark upon this Azariah should have been added to his grandfather of the same name (Ch1 6:9), who was the son of Ahimaaz, and that he was the priest who first officiated in Solomon's temple. 3. Some other of the families of the Levites are here accounted for. One of the families of Gershom (that of Libni) is here drawn down as far as Samuel, who had the honour of a prophet added to that of a Levite. One of the families of Merari (that of Mahli) is likewise drawn down for several descents, Ch1 6:29, Ch1 6:30.
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Chronicles 6:15 serves as a concise yet profoundly significant historical anchor within the extensive priestly genealogy of the Levites, specifically noting that Jehozadak, a high priest in the lineage, was taken into captivity. This verse pinpoints the moment when the divine judgment of the Babylonian Exile befell Judah and Jerusalem, explicitly attributing the cataclysmic event to the sovereign will of the LORD, even as it was executed through the military might of Nebuchadnezzar. It underscores the theological conviction that Israel's suffering was a direct consequence of their covenant unfaithfulness, yet its inclusion within a continuous genealogy affirms God's enduring faithfulness to His promises and the preservation of the priestly line despite severe disruption.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
1 Chronicles 6:15 employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. Metonymy is evident in the mention of "Jehozadak," who stands in for the entire high priestly line and, symbolically, the nation of Judah itself. His personal "captivity" represents the national subjugation and exile. The phrase "the LORD carried away Judah and Jerusalem" utilizes Agentive Language, where God is explicitly named as the direct agent of the action, even though human instruments (Nebuchadnezzar) are involved. This emphasizes God's ultimate sovereignty and control over historical events. The verse also functions as a Historical Marker or Pivot Point within the genealogy, signaling a significant turning point in Israel's history—the end of an era and the beginning of the exile—without dwelling on the tragedy's details. Its Conciseness is striking; a single, brief statement encapsulates a period of immense suffering and national upheaval, allowing the reader to grasp the magnitude of the event by its very brevity within the larger, unbroken genealogical record.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Chronicles 6:15 is a potent theological statement embedded within a historical record. It asserts God's absolute sovereignty over human history, demonstrating that even the rise and fall of nations, and the suffering of His own people, are ultimately under His control and serve His divine purposes. The exile, though a period of immense suffering and loss, was understood as a just consequence of Israel's persistent rebellion and idolatry, a fulfillment of the covenant curses outlined in the Law. Yet, the Chronicler's inclusion of this event within an unbroken priestly lineage speaks volumes about God's enduring faithfulness. Even in judgment, God preserves a remnant and maintains His promises, ensuring that the line of the priesthood, essential for future worship and atonement, would continue, thus holding out the hope of restoration and the eventual re-establishment of His people in the land.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
1 Chronicles 6:15, though a single verse in a genealogy, offers profound insights for contemporary reflection. It reminds us that God is not a distant deity but an active participant in human history, orchestrating events—even through seemingly hostile nations—to accomplish His righteous purposes. The Babylonian captivity was a period of intense suffering for Israel, but it also served as a time of spiritual purification and a catalyst for renewed covenant faithfulness. For us today, this verse highlights the solemn reality that God holds individuals and nations accountable for their actions and that there are indeed consequences for persistent disobedience to His commands. It challenges us to examine our own lives and societies for areas of unfaithfulness and to recognize that God's justice is an immutable aspect of His character. Yet, it also offers immense hope: even in the midst of severe judgment and disruption, God remains faithful to His promises, preserving a remnant and ensuring the continuity of His redemptive plan. This encourages us to trust in God's ultimate faithfulness even when our circumstances seem bleak or His purposes are unclear, knowing that He works all things for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purpose.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is Jehozadak specifically mentioned in this genealogical record?
Answer: Jehozadak is singled out because his "going into captivity" marks the pivotal moment of the Babylonian Exile for the high priestly line. While the genealogies typically list names without comment, this historical note is crucial for the Chronicler's post-exilic audience. It affirms that even through the devastating exile, the high priestly lineage, which was central to Israel's worship and identity, remained intact. Jehozadak's son, Jeshua (Joshua), would later return to Jerusalem and play a vital role in the rebuilding of the Temple, demonstrating the continuity of God's covenant and the re-establishment of the priesthood (Ezra 3:2).
Does "the LORD carried away" mean God directly caused the suffering of the exile?
Answer: Yes, from the biblical theological perspective presented in Chronicles and throughout the Old Testament, "the LORD carried away" explicitly means that God was the ultimate agent behind the exile. While Nebuchadnezzar was the human instrument, the text emphasizes God's sovereign control over history and His use of nations to accomplish His purposes. This highlights God's justice in bringing judgment upon His disobedient people, fulfilling the warnings of the covenant (e.g., Deuteronomy 28). It's not about God being cruel, but about His holiness and His commitment to His covenant, which included both blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience.
What is the broader significance of the "captivity" in the book of Chronicles?
Answer: For the Chronicler, the "captivity" (exile) is presented as a profound low point, a direct consequence of Israel's prolonged sin and covenant unfaithfulness. However, it is not the end of the story. Rather, it is a period of divine discipline and purification, intended to bring the people back to God. The Chronicler's meticulous tracing of genealogies through the exile, including Jehozadak, underscores God's faithfulness in preserving a remnant and His promises. The exile ultimately sets the stage for the return and the rebuilding of the Temple, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His people and His redemptive plan, even in the face of their failures (2 Chronicles 36:20-23).
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
1 Chronicles 6:15, with its stark declaration of the high priest Jehozadak going into captivity, vividly portrays the brokenness and vulnerability of the Old Covenant priesthood. This historical moment, where the very representative of God's presence among His people is taken captive, underscores the temporary and imperfect nature of the Levitical system. It points forward to the profound need for a High Priest who could never be taken captive, whose ministry would be eternal and whose sacrifice would be perfectly efficacious. Jesus Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of this need, serving as our great High Priest, "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens" (Hebrews 7:26). Unlike Jehozadak, who was subject to earthly powers and the consequences of sin, Jesus, through His once-for-all sacrifice, entered "not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption" (Hebrews 9:12). His "captivity" was not one imposed by an earthly king like Nebuchadnezzar, but a voluntary submission to the cross, where He bore the ultimate "captivity" of sin and death for humanity. Through His resurrection and ascension, Jesus established a priesthood that is "permanent, since he continues forever" (Hebrews 7:24), offering true liberation from the spiritual exile of sin and ushering in an eternal covenant of grace.