Skip to content
H7960

שָׁלוּ

shâlûw /shaw-loo'/ Ask about this word
(Aramaic) or שָׁלוּת
(Aramaic), from the same as שָׁלָה; a fault
error, thing amiss.
idiom fail

Word Study

In depth

A plain-language study of shâlûw — the range of meaning it carries, how Scripture actually uses it, and where it points. Written for readers who don’t know the original language.

Core Meaning & Semantic Range

The Aramaic word shâlûw, represented by H7960, denotes a fault or error. It appears 4 times across 4 unique verses in the Bible. Based on its root, it conveys the idea of a fault, and is used idiomatically to mean a "thing amiss" or to "fail".

Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis

In the biblical narrative, H7960 is used to describe different kinds of failures. In the context of personal character, Daniel's adversaries could find no error or fault in him because he was faithful Daniel 6:4. It is also used in royal commands. A decree demands that provisions for burnt offerings be supplied "without fail" Ezra 6:9, while another warns officials not to fail in their duty to halt construction, lest it result in damage to the kings Ezra 4:22. Finally, it is used to define blasphemy, where speaking any thing amiss against the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego carries a severe penalty Daniel 3:29.

Related Words & Concepts

Several related Aramaic words expand upon the concept of fault and faithfulness:

  • H7955 shâlâh (a wrong; thing amiss): From a corresponding root, this word is used with H7960 to describe speaking a thing amiss against God Daniel 3:29.
  • H7844 shᵉchath (corrupt, fault): This term is paired directly with error H7960 to emphasize that Daniel's accusers could find no fault in him at all Daniel 6:4.
  • H540 ʼăman (believe, faithful, sure): Presented as the antithesis to error, Daniel's lack of any H7960 is explained by the fact that he was faithful H540.

Theological Significance

The conceptual weight of H7960 is tied to ideas of integrity, obedience, and consequence.

  • Personal Integrity: The absence of error H7960 is the ultimate measure of Daniel's character. His faithfulness to God rendered him blameless, and no error or fault could be found in him by his enemies Daniel 6:4.
  • Royal and Divine Mandate: The term underscores the non-negotiable nature of a command. Whether providing for temple sacrifices "without fail" Ezra 6:9 or forbidding a thing amiss from being spoken against God Daniel 3:29, the word implies a strict standard where failure has serious repercussions.
  • Political Consequence: A failure to act can lead directly to negative outcomes. In Ezra, the command not to fail is motivated by the desire to prevent damage H2257 and hurt H5142 from growing against the kings Ezra 4:22.

Summary

In summary, H7960 is not just a simple mistake but a significant Aramaic term for a fault with serious implications. It defines the blamelessness of the faithful, like Daniel, and sets the standard for absolute obedience to both royal and divine decrees. The word illustrates how an error, a failure in duty, or a thing amiss spoken can result in severe political or spiritual consequences, making its absence a mark of integrity and its presence a trigger for judgment.

How the KJV Renders It

Translation

Strong’s lists the renderings but not their weight. These are counted from the King James text of the tagged verses — the bar under each is how often the translators actually reached for it. Select one to filter the occurrences below.

Grammatical Forms

Morphology

In the Hebrew Old Testament, this word appears as a noun across 3 occurrences, inflected in 1 grammatical form — each row is one form, and the bar is how often it is that form. Select any form to read what each part of its name means, and to filter the occurrence list to it.

  • שָׁלוּ

Related Words

Related

Other entries the study above points to — each one is drawn from a reference it makes. Follow the trail to see how the words connect.

Theographic Context

Context

The people, places, and span of history the verses containing this word touch on — drawn from the theographic tagging of Scripture. Select any name to isolate its verses in the occurrence list.

Biblical Distribution

Distribution

Appears in 4 verses across 2 of the 39 books. Most frequent in Ezra and Daniel (2 verses each); never once in the other 37.

2
Ezra
2
Daniel

Every Occurrence

Concordance

Every verse where the word is tagged in the King James text. Filter by book, by the English word the translators chose, by grammatical form, or search within the verses.

Sources. Definition and numbering: James Strong, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (1890). Morphology: STEPBible / Tyndale House (CC BY). Verse tagging: the King James text keyed to Strong’s numbers. Every count on this page is computed from the tagged corpus, not estimated.