from the same as צָלָף and אֶחָד; Tselophchad, an Israelite; Zelophehad.
Transliteration:Tsᵉlophchâd
Pronunciation:tsel-of-chawd'
Detailed Word Study
AI-Generated
Loading Study...
### Core Meaning & Semantic Range
The name Tsᵉlophchâd (`{{H6765}}`) is a proper noun, referring to a specific individual in the biblical narrative. Its etymology, as provided in the base definition, suggests a compound origin from צָלָף (tsalaph, related to `{{H6764}}`, "caper" or "caper plant") and אֶחָד (echad, `{{H259}}`, "one" or "united"). While the precise meaning of the name "Zelophehad" is not explicitly stated in the text, scholarly interpretations often propose meanings such as "first rupture," "first-born," or "shadow of fear," reflecting the possible nuances of its constituent elements. Given the context of his daughters' plea, the name's etymology, while intriguing, primarily serves to identify the individual whose family line became pivotal for a significant legal precedent concerning inheritance in ancient Israel. For a proper noun, the semantic range is primarily the person it denotes, and the significance lies in their narrative role rather than a broader conceptual meaning.
### Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis
Zelophehad (Tsᵉlophchâd) is mentioned primarily in the books of Numbers and Joshua. He was a descendant of Manasseh, specifically from the family of Hepher, son of Gilead, son of Machir, son of Manasseh ([[Numbers 27:1]], [[Numbers 36:2]], [[Joshua 17:3]]). His significance in the biblical narrative stems not from his own actions, but from the unique circumstances of his death and the subsequent actions of his five daughters: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.
Zelophehad died in the wilderness without leaving any sons, only daughters ([[Numbers 27:1]]). Crucially, the text explicitly states that he "was not among the company of those who gathered themselves together against the Lord in the company of Korah, but died in his own sin" ([[Numbers 27:3]]). This distinction was vital for his daughters' case, as it implied his death was not due to a major rebellion that would disqualify his family from inheritance.
Upon the impending division of the land of Canaan, his daughters approached Moses, Eleazar the priest, and the leaders of the congregation, arguing that their father's name should not be lost from his clan simply because he had no sons. They requested that they be granted an inheritance among their father's relatives ([[Numbers 27:1-4]]). Moses brought their case before the Lord, who affirmed the justice of their plea, establishing a new legal precedent: if a man dies without a son, his inheritance should pass to his daughters ([[Numbers 27:5-8]]). This ruling was a significant expansion of Israelite inheritance law.
Later, the heads of the families of Gilead, the clan of Manasseh, raised a concern regarding this ruling: if Zelophehad's daughters married outside their own tribe, their inherited land would be alienated from the tribe of Manasseh and transferred to the tribe of their husbands ([[Numbers 36:1-3]]). To address this, a further divine decree was issued, stipulating that Zelophehad's daughters, and any future daughters who inherited land, must marry within their own tribal clan ([[Numbers 36:6-9]]). This ensured that the land allocated to each tribe remained within that tribe, preserving the divinely ordained tribal boundaries.
The daughters of Zelophehad faithfully followed this instruction, marrying their cousins within the families of the sons of Manasseh ([[Numbers 36:10-12]]). Their inheritance was then recorded as part of the allotment to the tribe of Manasseh in [[Joshua 17:3-6]].
### Related Words & Concepts
The narrative surrounding Zelophehad is deeply interwoven with several key biblical concepts and terms:
* **Inheritance (נַחֲלָה - nachalah, `{{H5159}}`):** This is the central theme, referring to the divinely promised land of Canaan, distributed by lot among the tribes and families of Israel. The case of Zelophehad's daughters highlights the importance of preserving this inheritance within family lines and tribal boundaries.
* **Law (תּוֹרָה - torah, `{{H8451}}`):** The case demonstrates the dynamic nature of Mosaic Law, where new divine rulings could be given to address specific circumstances not explicitly covered by existing statutes, showcasing God's ongoing revelation and justice.
* **Tribe (שֵׁבֶט - shebet, `{{H7626}}`):** The tribal structure and the preservation of tribal land allotments were crucial for Israelite identity and the fulfillment of God's covenant promises.
* **Justice (מִשְׁפָּט - mishpat, `{{H4941}}`):** The Lord's ruling in favor of Zelophehad's daughters underscores divine justice and equity, ensuring that no family's name or inheritance would be lost due to a lack of male heirs.
* **Women's Status:** While Israelite society was patriarchal, this narrative provides a remarkable example of women taking initiative, advocating for their rights, and having their plea heard and affirmed by God, demonstrating a degree of agency and legal standing for women within the Law.
* **Manasseh (מְנַשֶּׁה - Menashsheh, `{{H4519}}`):** Zelophehad belonged to this tribe, and the case directly impacted the land allocation for Manasseh.
### Theological Significance
The story of Zelophehad, through his daughters, carries profound theological significance:
1. **Divine Justice and Equity:** God is portrayed as a God of justice who hears the pleas of the vulnerable and ensures fair treatment. The daughters' case was not dismissed based on traditional patriarchal norms but was judged on its merit, leading to a just and compassionate outcome. This demonstrates God's concern for equity and His willingness to adapt the application of His law to ensure fairness.
2. **The Adaptability and Completeness of God's Law:** The Mosaic Law, though divine, was not a static, exhaustive code for every conceivable situation. The case of Zelophehad's daughters illustrates that God could provide new revelations and expand the application of His Law to address unique circumstances, demonstrating its living and dynamic nature. It shows that the Law was sufficient to cover unforeseen situations through divine interpretation.
3. **The Sanctity of the Land Inheritance:** The narrative underscores the immense importance of the land as a divine gift and an integral part of Israel's covenant identity. The elaborate measures taken to ensure the preservation of tribal land boundaries, even through specific marriage regulations, highlight how central the land was to Israel's theological understanding of itself and its relationship with God.
4. **God's Care for the Vulnerable:** The daughters, as women without male protectors or inheritors, were in a precarious social and economic position. God's direct intervention on their behalf highlights His compassion and provision for those who might otherwise be marginalized or disadvantaged within societal structures.
5. **Faith and Initiative:** The daughters of Zelophehad demonstrate remarkable faith and initiative in approaching Moses and the leaders. Their bold and reasoned plea, rooted in their understanding of justice and their desire to preserve their father's name and inheritance, serves as an example of seeking God's will and trusting in His righteousness.
### Summary
Zelophehad (`{{H6765}}`) was an Israelite from the tribe of Manasseh who died in the wilderness without leaving any sons, only five daughters. His significance in the biblical narrative is entirely posthumous, centered on the legal challenge brought by his daughters regarding their right to inherit their father's land. Their bold and righteous plea, rooted in the desire to preserve their father's name and inheritance, led to a landmark divine ruling from the Lord through Moses. This ruling established a new precedent in Israelite law, allowing daughters to inherit in the absence of sons. A subsequent ruling further stipulated that these daughters must marry within their own tribal clan to prevent the alienation of tribal land. The story of Zelophehad's daughters, therefore, profoundly illustrates divine justice and equity, the dynamic and adaptable nature of God's Law, the crucial importance of land inheritance within Israel, and God's compassionate care for the vulnerable in society.