(Aramaic) from an unused root probably meaning to fashion; a potter; potter.
Transliteration:pechâr
Pronunciation:peh-khawr'
Detailed Word Study
AI-Generated
Loading Study...
### Core Meaning & Semantic Range
H6353 (פֶּחָר, *pechâr*) is an Aramaic noun derived from an unused root that likely conveys the sense of "to fashion" or "to shape." Its primary meaning is "potter," referring to one who molds and forms objects, typically from clay. The semantic range is quite focused on this specific craft, emphasizing the skilled act of transforming raw, pliable material into a designed and functional vessel or object. Implicit in the term is the concept of control over the material and the ability to impart form and purpose.
### Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis
As an Aramaic term, H6353 appears exclusively in the Aramaic portions of the Old Testament. It occurs only twice in the Hebrew Bible, both instances found in the book of Daniel, specifically within the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream:
* **[[Daniel 2:41]]**: "And whereas you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter's clay and partly of iron, it shall be a divided kingdom; but there shall be in it the strength of iron, inasmuch as you saw the iron mixed with the `{{H6353}}` clay." Here, *pechâr* functions adjectivally (or as a genitive construction), modifying `{{H2635}}` (chasaph), "clay." The image describes a kingdom that is a mixture of disparate elements: the strength of iron and the brittleness of potter's clay. This mixture symbolizes a kingdom that will be inherently divided and lack true cohesion, possessing both strength and profound weakness.
* **[[Daniel 2:43]]**: "As you saw iron mixed with `{{H6353}}` clay, so they will mix with one another in marriage, but they will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with clay." The same phrase, "potter's clay" (חֲסַף פֶּחָר), is used again. The emphasis here is on the *inability* of these two materials – iron and clay – to truly bond or cohere. This serves as a powerful metaphor for the internal instability and eventual failure of the kingdom represented by these feet, despite attempts at unification (e.g., through intermarriage). The inherent properties of the clay, its fragility and inability to permanently fuse with iron, are central to the prophetic message.
In both contexts, H6353 highlights the nature of the material itself – clay that has been worked by a potter, implying its malleability but also its ultimate fragility and susceptibility to breakage, especially when contrasted with the unyielding nature of iron.
### Related Words & Concepts
The concept of the "potter" and "clay" is a rich biblical motif, even if H6353 itself is limited in its occurrences.
* **Hebrew Counterparts:** The most prominent Hebrew word for "potter" is `{{H3336}}` (yotser), derived from the verb `{{H3335}}` (yatsar), "to form, fashion, frame." This Hebrew root is frequently used to describe God as the divine Potter who forms humanity ([[Genesis 2:7]], [[Isaiah 64:8]]) and nations ([[Jeremiah 18:6]]).
* **Clay (Hebrew):** The Hebrew equivalents for clay include `{{H2563}}` (chomer) and `{{H2916}}` (tiyt), both of which carry connotations of raw, malleable material often associated with human frailty and dependence on the divine Potter.
* **Sovereignty and Frailty:** The broader biblical theme evoked by the potter and clay imagery is that of divine sovereignty over human destiny and the inherent frailty and dependence of humanity. While H6353 in Daniel focuses on the fragility of human kingdoms, it implicitly draws upon this larger theological framework.
* **Mixing/Cohesion:** The concept of materials that cannot cohere (iron and clay) is central to the meaning of H6353 in Daniel. This relates to themes of unity, division, and the ultimate stability of kingdoms, both human and divine.
### Theological Significance
The theological significance of H6353 primarily stems from its metaphorical use in Daniel 2:
* **The Fragility of Human Kingdoms:** The "potter's clay" in Nebuchadnezzar's dream symbolizes the inherent weakness and impermanence of human empires. Unlike the enduring strength of God's kingdom, earthly powers, even when formidable, contain elements of division and brittleness that lead to their eventual collapse. The mixture of iron and clay signifies an attempt at forced unity that is ultimately unsustainable.
* **Divine Sovereignty over History:** By highlighting the instability of human constructs, the prophecy implicitly contrasts them with the eternal and unbreakable kingdom that God himself will establish ([[Daniel 2:44]]). The inability of the iron and clay to mix points to a divine order that governs the rise and fall of nations, demonstrating that human efforts to achieve lasting power apart from God's design are ultimately futile.
* **Anthropological Implications (Indirect):** While H6353 doesn't directly refer to humanity as clay in the hands of God, its usage within Daniel's prophecy aligns with the broader biblical understanding of humanity's dependence and vulnerability. Just as a potter's clay is easily shaped and can be broken, so too are human kingdoms subject to divine judgment and dissolution.
### Summary
H6353 (פֶּחָר, *pechâr*) is an Aramaic noun meaning "potter," derived from a root signifying "to fashion" or "to shape." Its two occurrences in the Bible are both found in the book of Daniel ([[Daniel 2:41]], [[Daniel 2:43]]), where it appears in the phrase "potter's clay" (חֲסַף פֶּחָר). In this prophetic context, the "potter's clay" serves as a powerful metaphor for the inherent fragility, internal division, and ultimate impermanence of human kingdoms. When contrasted with iron, the clay symbolizes weakness and an inability to truly cohere, signifying that despite attempts at unification, the kingdom represented will be unstable and destined to break apart. While H6353 does not directly refer to God as the Potter, its usage in Daniel profoundly contributes to the broader biblical theme of divine sovereignty over human history, emphasizing that only God's kingdom is truly unbreakable and eternal, standing in stark contrast to the transient and vulnerable nature of all human constructs.
TRV