of Egyptian derivation; Poti-Phera, an Egyptian; Poti-pherah.
Transliteration:Pôwṭîy Pheraʻ
Pronunciation:po-tee feh'-rah
Detailed Word Study
AI-Generated
Loading Study...
### Core Meaning & Semantic Range
The Hebrew lemma פּוֹטִי פֶרַע (Pôwṭîy Pheraʻ), transliterated as Potiphar, refers exclusively to a specific individual in the biblical narrative. As a proper noun, its semantic range is limited to this person. The definition notes its "Egyptian derivation," which is crucial for understanding its cultural context. While the Bible does not explicitly define the name, scholarly consensus suggests it is a shortened form of "Potiphera" and means "He whom Ra gave" or "Devoted to Ra," referring to the Egyptian sun god. This etymology immediately identifies Potiphar as a high-ranking Egyptian official deeply embedded in the polytheistic religious and political system of ancient Egypt. His name thus signifies his identity as a pagan, yet one through whom God would work His sovereign purposes.
### Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis
Potiphar appears exclusively within the Genesis account of Joseph. He is first introduced in [[Genesis 37:36]] as "an officer of Pharaoh, captain of the guard." This designation indicates a position of significant authority and trust within the Egyptian court, likely overseeing the royal prison and perhaps even the execution of criminals.
His primary role in the narrative unfolds in [[Genesis 39:1-6]]. After Joseph is sold into slavery by his brothers, God providentially leads him to Potiphar's household. Here, Joseph's diligence, wisdom, and the blessing of the Lord upon him are so evident that Potiphar entrusts Joseph with the management of his entire estate, recognizing that "the LORD was with him and that the LORD granted him success in everything he did" ([[Genesis 39:3]]). This period serves as a crucial training ground for Joseph, allowing him to develop administrative skills and demonstrating his faithfulness in a foreign land.
The turning point occurs in [[Genesis 39:7-20]] when Potiphar's wife falsely accuses Joseph of attempted rape after he rejects her advances. Despite Joseph's proven integrity and the lack of direct evidence, Potiphar, perhaps out of public shame or a hasty judgment, casts Joseph into the king's prison, which would have been under his own jurisdiction as captain of the guard. While Potiphar's action appears unjust, it is significant that he does not execute Joseph, which would have been within his power for such a perceived offense. This restraint, whether intentional or providential, preserves Joseph's life and sets the stage for his eventual elevation through his interpretation of the dreams of Pharaoh's cupbearer and baker, who were also held in the same prison.
### Related Words & Concepts
The study of Potiphar naturally connects to several broader biblical themes and figures:
* **Egyptian Context:** His identity as an "officer of Pharaoh" (often rendered as "chief eunuch" or "chief of the bodyguards") places him firmly within the political and social structure of ancient Egypt. This context is vital for understanding Joseph's journey from slave to prime minister. The word for "Egyptian" is `{{H4713}}`.
* **Divine Providence:** Potiphar serves as a key instrument in God's overarching plan for Joseph and, by extension, for the nation of Israel. His household is both a place of blessing and a crucible of trial.
* **Integrity and Temptation:** Potiphar's household becomes the setting for Joseph's profound test of moral integrity in the face of temptation from Potiphar's wife. Joseph's steadfastness highlights his faithfulness to God even in adversity.
* **Injustice and Suffering:** Potiphar's decision to imprison Joseph, based on a false accusation, is an act of injustice that leads to Joseph's suffering. This suffering, however, is ultimately redeemed by God's sovereign hand.
* **Joseph as a Type:** Joseph's experience under Potiphar—his unjust suffering and subsequent elevation—is often seen as a prefigurement or "type" of Christ, who also suffered unjustly before His exaltation.
### Theological Significance
Potiphar's presence in the biblical narrative, though brief, is profoundly significant from a theological perspective. He is a testament to God's meticulous providence, demonstrating how the Lord orchestrates circumstances, even through human sin and injustice, to fulfill His divine purposes. Potiphar's initial trust in Joseph and his subsequent, albeit flawed, judgment in imprisoning him, are both crucial steps in Joseph's journey toward becoming the savior of his family and a deliverer for Egypt.
The narrative underscores God's sovereignty over all nations and individuals, even those who do not acknowledge Him. Potiphar, a pagan official, unwittingly becomes a vessel for God's plan, highlighting that the Lord's redemptive work is not confined to the covenant people but extends to the broader world, using even the actions of the unrighteous for His glory. Furthermore, Joseph's unwavering faith and moral purity while serving in Potiphar's household provide a powerful example of living righteously in a corrupt environment, demonstrating that God's presence enables His servants to thrive and remain faithful amidst trials.
### Summary
Pôwṭîy Pheraʻ (Potiphar) is a high-ranking Egyptian official, captain of Pharaoh's guard, whose name suggests devotion to the Egyptian sun god Ra. He is a pivotal, though ultimately secondary, character in the Joseph narrative in Genesis. Potiphar initially provides a place of service and advancement for Joseph, recognizing God's blessing upon him. However, his wife's false accusation leads him to imprison Joseph, an act of injustice that ironically serves as a crucial step in God's providential plan. Potiphar's role highlights God's sovereign control over seemingly random or unjust events, demonstrating how He uses all circumstances, even those involving pagan officials and human sin, to accomplish His redemptive purposes for His people and for the world. His story underscores themes of divine providence, integrity in adversity, and God's overarching control over history.