### Core Meaning & Semantic Range
The Aramaic word **mᵉlach**, represented by `{{H4415}}`, corresponds to the concept of eating salt. It is used to mean subsisting or, more specifically, to **have maintenance**. Appearing only **1 time** in **1 unique verse**, its usage provides a concise yet powerful illustration of loyalty derived from provision.
### Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis
The sole biblical occurrence of `{{H4415}}` is in Ezra, within a letter of warning to the king of Persia. The writers express their allegiance by stating their reason for concern: "because we have **maintenance** from the king's palace" [[Ezra 4:14]]. This phrase signifies that their sustenance and livelihood are provided by the king. Because of this provision, they felt it was not **meet** `{{H749}}` for them to witness the king's **dishonour** `{{H6173}}` without acting.
### Related Words & Concepts
Several related words help clarify the context of this declaration of loyalty:
* `{{H4416}}` **mᵉlach** (salt): This is the noun form that appears alongside the verb in the phrase for "maintenance" [[Ezra 4:14]]. It is also used to refer to salt as a provision for offerings [[Ezra 6:9]], highlighting its role as a valuable commodity.
* `{{H4430}}` **melek** (a king): This word identifies the source of the maintenance. The writers' obligation is directly tied to the **king** [[Ezra 4:14]], who holds the power to remove or set up other kings [[Daniel 2:21]].
* `{{H1965}}` **hêykal** (palace, temple): This term specifies the location from which the provision originates, the "king's **palace**" [[Ezra 4:14]]. It denotes a large, important building, whether for royalty [[Daniel 4:4]] or for God [[Ezra 5:14]].
### Theological Significance
The concept conveyed by `{{H4415}}` carries significant weight regarding social and political obligation:
* **Covenant of Salt:** The act of "eating salt" with someone, or receiving **maintenance**, established a binding relationship. This implied a strong covenant of loyalty between the provider (the king) and the recipients.
* **Obligation from Sustenance:** The writers' motivation to **certify** `{{H3046}}` the king about a potential threat stems directly from the fact that they are sustained by him. Their loyalty is not abstract; it is a direct response to the provision they receive [[Ezra 4:14]].
* **Protecting the Patron:** The use of `{{H4415}}` demonstrates the principle of patronage. Because they were supported by the king's palace, the writers were duty-bound to protect his assets and authority from dishonor.
### Summary
In summary, `{{H4415}}` is much more than a term for subsistence. It is a key to understanding an ancient expression of unwavering allegiance rooted in provision. Though appearing only once, it powerfully illustrates how the act of receiving **maintenance** created a sacred duty to honor and protect one's benefactor, transforming a daily necessity into a profound statement of loyalty.
TRV