Skip to content
H1693

דְּבַק

dᵉbaq /deb-ak'/ Ask about this word
(Aramaic) corresponding to דָּבַק
to stick to
cleave.

Word Study

In depth

A plain-language study of dᵉbaq — the range of meaning it carries, how Scripture actually uses it, and where it points. Written for readers who don’t know the original language.

Core Meaning & Semantic Range

The Aramaic word dᵉbaq, represented by H1693, means to stick to; cleave. It appears 1 times across 1 unique verses in the Bible. This term, corresponding to its Hebrew counterpart, describes the act of two or more things bonding or adhering to one another in a strong, unified way.

Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis

The sole use of H1693 is found in Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's prophetic dream. The dream features a great statue whose feet are made of iron mixed with clay. In describing this final, divided kingdom, the prophecy states that its components "shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay" Daniel 2:43. The word is used negatively to emphasize a fundamental lack of cohesion and unity in this future power.

Related Words & Concepts

Several related words provide context for the concept of mixing versus true unity:

  • H6151 ʻărab (to commingle; mingle (self), mix): This word is used in direct contrast to H1693 in the same passage. While the elements of the kingdom can be mixed together, they cannot truly bond or cleave, highlighting a superficial union Daniel 2:43.
  • H1934 hâvâʼ (to exist; be, become): This common Aramaic verb sets the state of being in the prophecy. It is used to frame the action, indicating that the kingdoms "shall mingle" but "shall not cleave," establishing this division as a future certainty Daniel 2:43.

Theological Significance

The theological weight of H1693 is concentrated in its prophetic context.

  • Prophetic Disunity: The inability to cleave is the defining characteristic of the final human kingdom in Daniel's vision. It symbolizes an empire or alliance that is internally fractured and inherently unstable because its parts are incompatible Daniel 2:43.
  • A Lack of True Bonding: The word's use underscores the difference between a forced mixture and a genuine, strong union. The iron and clay can be combined, but they cannot cleave, illustrating that the kingdom's foundation is weak and prone to collapse.
  • Inherent Incompatibility: The failure to cleave is presented as the direct result of the materials' incompatible natures. The text explicitly states this is "even as iron is not mixed with clay," making the word a metaphor for irreconcilable differences that prevent lasting unity Daniel 2:43.

Summary

In summary, H1693 dᵉbaq offers a single but potent image of disunity and weakness. Its solitary appearance in the prophecy of Daniel gives it significant meaning, defining the fatal flaw of a prophesied world power. The word powerfully distinguishes between a superficial mixture and the true, bonded strength that comes from cleaving, a quality that this final kingdom will lack.

How the KJV Renders It

Translation

Strong’s lists the renderings but not their weight. These are counted from the King James text of the tagged verses — the bar under each is how often the translators actually reached for it. Select one to filter the occurrences below.

Grammatical Forms

Morphology

In the Hebrew Old Testament, this word appears as a verb across 1 occurrence, inflected in 1 grammatical form — each row is one form, and the bar is how often it is that form. Select any form to read what each part of its name means, and to filter the occurrence list to it.

  • דָּבְקִין

Related Words

Related

Other entries the study above points to — each one is drawn from a reference it makes. Follow the trail to see how the words connect.

Theographic Context

Context

The people, places, and span of history the verses containing this word touch on — drawn from the theographic tagging of Scripture. Select any name to isolate its verses in the occurrence list.

Biblical Distribution

Distribution

1 verse, all in Daniel — and none of the other 38 Old Testament books.

Every Occurrence

Concordance

Every verse where the word is tagged in the King James text. Filter by book, by the English word the translators chose, by grammatical form, or search within the verses.

Sources. Definition and numbering: James Strong, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (1890). Morphology: STEPBible / Tyndale House (CC BY). Verse tagging: the King James text keyed to Strong’s numbers. Every count on this page is computed from the tagged corpus, not estimated.