[And] they were married into the families of the sons of Manasseh the son of Joseph, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of the family of their father.
And they were married {H802} into the families {H4940} of the sons {H1121} of Manasseh {H4519} the son {H1121} of Joseph {H3130}, and their inheritance {H5159} remained in the tribe {H4294} of the family {H4940} of their father {H1}.
They were married into the families of the descendants of M'nasheh the son of Yosef, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of their father's family.
They married within the clans of the descendants of Manasseh son of Joseph, and their inheritance remained within the tribe of their father’s clan.
They were married into the families of the sons of Manasseh the son of Joseph; and their inheritance remained in the tribe of the family of their father.
No cross-references found for this verse.
Commentary on Numbers 36:12
Numbers 36:12 concludes the specific legal case concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, ensuring their unique inheritance remained within their ancestral tribe. This verse highlights the meticulous care taken in ancient Israel to preserve tribal boundaries and family inheritances as commanded by God.
Context
This verse is the culmination of a significant legal and social issue first raised in Numbers 27. The five daughters of Zelophehad (Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah) approached Moses, Eleazar the priest, and the leaders, pointing out that their father had died without sons, and thus his name and portion of the promised land would be lost. God, through Moses, affirmed their plea, establishing a precedent that daughters could inherit land when there were no sons. However, this new law presented a potential challenge: if these daughters married outside their tribe, their inherited land would eventually pass to another tribe, disrupting the divinely ordained tribal land distribution. Numbers 36 addresses this very concern, as the heads of the tribal families of the sons of Gilead (of Manasseh, their own tribe) brought this issue to Moses, seeking a solution to prevent tribal land from being alienated.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The key Hebrew word here is "inheritance" (נַחֲלָה - nachalah), which refers to an allotted possession, specifically land, passed down through family lines. It emphasizes the concept of a permanent, divinely given legacy, not just temporary ownership. The phrase "remained in the tribe of the family of their father" clearly signifies the successful outcome of the legal challenge, ensuring the land stayed with the descendants of Joseph, through Manasseh.
Practical Application
This passage illustrates several timeless principles:
The story of Zelophehad's daughters and this culminating verse serve as a powerful testament to God's justice, His meticulous care for His covenant people, and the importance of adhering to the principles of order and inheritance He established for them.