Skip to content

Matthew 27:49

“The Crucifixion of Jesus”Matthew 27:32–49

King James Version
The rest said, Let be, let us see whether Elias will come to save him.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
The G1161 rest G3062 said G3004, Let be G863, let us see G1492 whether G1487 Elias G2243 will come G2064 to save G4982 him G846.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
But the others said, “Leave Him alone. Let us see if Elijah comes to save Him.”

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And the rest said, Let be; let us see whether Elijah cometh to save him.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
The rest said, “Let him be. Let’s see whether Elijah comes to save him.”

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Other said, Let be: let vs see, if Elias wil come and saue him.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
but the rest said, `Let alone, let us see if Elijah doth come--about to save him.'

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
11 Greek words
  1. οἱhoi[the]G3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  2. δὲdeAndG1161CONJConjunction
  3. λοιποὶloipoithe restG3062A-NPMAdjective Nominative Plural Masculine
  4. ἔλεγον·elegonwere sayingG3004V-IAI-3PVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  5. ἄφεςaphesWait!G863V-2AAM-2SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Imperative 2nd Singular
  6. ἴδωμενidōmenlet us seeG1492V-2AAS-1PVerb 2nd Aorist Active Subjunctive 1st Plural
  7. εἰeiwhetherG1487CONDConjunction
  8. ἔρχεταιerchetaicomesG2064V-PNI-3SVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 3rd Singular
  9. ἨλίαςĒliasElijahG2243N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  10. σώσωνsōsōnto then saveG4982V-FAP-NSMVerb Future Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  11. αὐτόνautonHimG846P-ASMPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Matthew 27:45-55
Matthew 27:45-55 View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,179 of 31,102 · 77.7%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

The others tell him to wait and see whether Elijah will come to save Jesus, while Jesus is in fact saving them.

“The rest said, Let be,”

The others hold the man back.

“let us see whether Elias will come to save him.”

They wait for Elijah to rescue him, while the Saviour is dying to save them.

Passage studyMatthew 27:32–49

The King of the Jews Crucified at Golgotha

Summary

When the soldiers lead Jesus out of Jerusalem, they press a man from Cyrene named Simon into carrying his cross. At Golgotha, the place of a skull, Jesus tastes a drink of vinegar mingled with gall and refuses it, and the soldiers crucify him, share out his clothes by lot and sit down to guard him. Over his head they fix the charge, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS, and on either side of him they crucify a thief. Passers-by, the chief priests with the scribes and elders, and even the thieves mock him and dare him to save himself and come down. From the sixth hour to the ninth, darkness covers the land, and then Jesus cries out the first words of Psalm 22, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Some who hear think he is calling for Elijah. Through all of it Scripture is being fulfilled, and the One they mock for staying on the cross stays there to save others.

Simon of Cyrene Carries the Cross

Before this, Pilate had washed his hands and handed Jesus over to be scourged (Matthew 27:24–26), and the soldiers had mocked him as King of the Jews with a robe, a crown of thorns and a reed (Matthew 27:27–31). “As they came out” is the procession leaving the city for the place of execution. A condemned man usually carried the crossbeam of his own cross, the patibulum, and John tells us that Jesus went out “bearing his cross” (John 19:17). Matthew, Mark and Luke all record that the soldiers then laid it on another man, and the plain reason is that Jesus, after the scourging, was too weak to carry it further. The Son of God was truly man, and his body failed under the load.

The man was Simon, from Cyrene, a city in North Africa in what is now Libya, with a large Jewish community. He was most likely a Jewish pilgrim who had come to Jerusalem for the Passover, an outsider who happened to be on the road that morning. Mark adds that he was the father of Alexander and Rufus (Mark 15:21).

The word “compelled” is angareúō, a word borrowed from Persian. It first meant to serve as a royal courier and came to mean pressing someone into public service, and Roman authority used it to seize men and goods as it needed them. Simon was conscripted on the spot. Jesus used the same verb in the Sermon on the Mount, when he told his disciples that if anyone compels them to go a mile, they should go with him two (Matthew 5:41). “To bear” is aírō, to lift up, take up or carry away, the verb behind John the Baptist’s words, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). The cross, staurós, is a stake or post set upright, the Roman instrument of execution, and the word later stands for Christ’s death itself.

Simon’s walk is a living picture of what Jesus had asked of every disciple: “If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me” (Matthew 16:24). Simon took up the cross because he was forced to, and yet he walked behind Jesus with it on his shoulders. Sharing another’s load is the life Paul describes when he writes, “Bear ye one another’s burdens” (Galatians 6:2). Simon carried the wood for a short distance. Jesus carried the weight of our sin, for “the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:3–6), and God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Did Simon become a follower of Jesus?

Mark names Simon’s sons as men his readers already knew, which strongly suggests that Simon and his family came to follow Christ. Scripture is silent about his faith before that day, and he began as an unwilling helper. The man who was made to carry the cross may well have been brought by it to the Saviour who died on it.

Golgotha, the Place of a Skull

“When they were come” uses érchomai, the everyday verb for coming or going, and it marks the end of the walk. The place is Golgothâ, a word of Aramaic origin (the “Chaldee” of the old lexicons) meaning “the skull”, the name of a knoll near Jerusalem. Matthew translates it for his Greek-speaking readers as “a place of a skull”, using kraníon, the word behind our “cranium”. The name Calvary comes from the Latin Calvaria, “skull”, which Jerome’s Latin Bible, the Vulgate, used for kraníon, and the KJV itself says Calvary in Luke’s account (Luke 23:33). Golgotha and Calvary are two names for one place.

Scripture leaves the reason for the name unstated. It may have come from the shape of the rocky hill, from its use as a place of execution, or from an old tradition that Adam’s skull lay there. Whichever it was, the name speaks of death, and it was there that Christ died to destroy death. Mark and John name the place as well (Mark 15:22, John 19:17). Our salvation was won at a real place, on a real day, before many witnesses.

Why was Jesus crucified outside the city?

Both the Law and Roman practice took executions outside the city. The Law commanded Israel to bring the blasphemer “without the camp” to be stoned (Leviticus 24:14), and Rome crucified men outside city walls, where the most people would pass and see. The Law also commanded that the bodies of the sin offerings of the Day of Atonement be carried outside the camp and burned (Leviticus 16:27). Hebrews draws the line from that offering to Golgotha: “Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate” (Hebrews 13:11–12). Being led out also showed that the city’s rulers had cast him out, even as he became the sin offering for his people.

The Drink Jesus Tasted and Refused

At Golgotha, before he was nailed to the cross, Jesus was given “vinegar to drink mingled with gall”. The vinegar, óxos, was sour wine, the cheap everyday drink of soldiers and labourers. Gall, cholḗ, is bile, and the word is used for bitter things. Mark describes the same drink as “wine mingled with myrrh” (Mark 15:23). It was a custom to offer a man about to be crucified a drink mixed with something bitter or numbing, and its purpose was most likely to dull the pain. Matthew’s wording matches the psalm of the righteous sufferer: “They gave me also gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink” (Psalm 69:21).

Jesus “tasted thereof”, so he knew what was offered, “and he would not drink”. The verb behind “would” is thélō, to will, wish or choose, and with ou, “not”, and pínō, “to drink”, the phrase says that he was unwilling to drink it. He chose to go to the cross with a clear mind and to bear all of it awake. He had said that he lays down his life of himself (John 10:17–18), and Hebrews says of him that “for the joy that was set before him” he “endured the cross, despising the shame” (Hebrews 12:2–3).

Why did he refuse this drink and accept a later one?

The two drinks had different purposes. The first was meant to dull pain, and he refused it. Near the end, after the hours of darkness, a bystander lifted plain sour wine to him on a sponge (verse 48), and John records that Jesus said, “I thirst,” and received it (John 19:28–30). That later drink met the thirst of a dying man, whose tongue cleaved to his jaws as the psalm says (Psalm 22:15), and it fulfilled Psalm 69:21 a second time. It came when his work was almost finished. He refused what would numb him and accepted what met his thirst.

Crucified, and His Clothes Divided by Lot

Matthew tells the crucifixion itself in four words: “And they crucified him.” The verb stauróō, to crucify, comes from staurós, the cross. Rome kept this death for slaves, rebels and the lowest criminals, and it was designed to give the greatest pain and the deepest public shame.

The soldiers who carried out an execution took the condemned man’s clothes as their pay, and here they “parted his garments, casting lots”. The verb diamerízō means to divide up and distribute, its usual sense, and casting lots was the common way of deciding a share, much like throwing dice. Matthew’s quotation uses two words for clothing, himátion for “garments”, the outer clothing, and himatismós for “vesture”, clothing in general. John fills in the scene. Jesus’ coat was “without seam, woven from the top throughout”, and tearing it would have ruined it, so the soldiers cast lots to decide who would have it whole (John 19:23–24). They left him stripped of everything he had.

“That it might be fulfilled” uses plēróō, to fill up or complete, the word Matthew uses for Scripture coming true from the birth of Jesus onward (Matthew 1:22–23). The prophet is David, and the words are from Psalm 22:18. The soldiers were dividing a dying man’s clothes for their own gain, thinking only of the spoil, and they did exactly what God had spoken through David. God rules even the careless acts of men who oppose his Son, and his word comes true down to a garment and a throw of the lots. The whole of Psalm 22 runs through this passage: the mocking, the wagging heads, the trust in God thrown back at the sufferer, the garments and the opening cry.

The One stripped at Golgotha is the One who clothes his people. Isaiah rejoices that the LORD has clothed him with the garments of salvation (Isaiah 61:10), and that clothing was bought here.

The Soldiers Sit Down to Watch

“And sitting down they watched him there.” The verb káthēmai means to sit or be seated, and also to stay in a place for a time. The verb tēréō means to guard by keeping an eye on someone, and its tense in the Greek describes a watch that went on and on. The adverb ekeî is simply “there”, at that place. The soldiers settled in for a long duty. They guarded the condemned so that nobody could take him down or rescue him, and they stayed until death. John records that they later broke the legs of the two others, found Jesus already dead, and pierced his side (John 19:31–37).

For these men it was routine work. The psalmist had said of his enemies, “they look and stare upon me” (Psalm 22:17), and Luke tells of the people standing and watching while the rulers scoffed (Luke 23:35). The soldiers watched without understanding what they saw. Before them the Son of Man was being lifted up, as he said, to draw all men to himself (John 12:32), and the Father “spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all” (Romans 8:32).

The Charge over His Head: The King of the Jews

The “accusation” is aitía, a cause or reason, and in law a charge brought against someone. Rome’s custom was to display a placard, the titulus, naming the condemned man and his crime, and here it was fixed to the cross above Jesus’ head. “Written” is gráphō, to write. John adds that the title was written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin, so that everyone in the crowd could read it (John 19:20).

The charge was THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS. The word for king, basileús, means one with authority to rule. To Roman ears the title named sedition against Caesar. To Jewish ears it named the Messiah, the son of David whom Israel awaited to restore its kingdom. The soldiers had already hailed him “King of the Jews” in mockery (Matthew 27:29). The chief priests asked Pilate to change the words to “He said, I am King of the Jews”, and Pilate refused (John 19:19–22).

Pilate wrote a charge, and God made it a proclamation. Jesus is the King of the Jews, and his kingship stands at the very hour of his shame. He had told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). His throne that day was a cross and his crown was thorns, and because he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, God has highly exalted him and given him the name above every name (Philippians 2:5–11). The One under that title is “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Revelation 19:16).

Why did Pilate keep the wording?

Pilate’s reasons were probably mixed. He may have wished to assert Rome’s authority over the people, to sneer at the leaders who had pressed him to condemn Jesus, or simply to be done with a dispute he cared little about, seeing Jesus as one more agitator. Whatever he intended, his refusal kept the truth written over the cross for all to read.

Numbered with the Transgressors

“Then were there two thieves crucified with him.” The word for thief is lēistḗs, from a verb meaning to plunder, a robber or brigand. It describes a violent bandit, sometimes a rebel against Rome, and it is the word John uses for Barabbas (John 18:40), a rebel and a murderer. These men were crucified (stauróō) with Jesus, “one on the right hand, and another on the left”. The word dexiós simply means the right hand or right side, and the point of the arrangement is that Jesus hung in the middle. Rome placed him with the worst criminals, as one of them.

In doing so, Rome fulfilled Isaiah’s word about the suffering servant, “he was numbered with the transgressors” (Isaiah 53:12), and Mark records that fulfilment (Mark 15:27–28). Luke tells how the two were led out with him to be put to death (Luke 23:32–33). Jesus had said that he came to call sinners to repentance (Mark 2:17), and he died among the guilty, for the guilty. “God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).

Verse 44 returns to these men. “The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.” “Crucified with” is systauróō, to crucify together with, a word for sharing the same death. “Cast in his teeth” is oneidízō, to reproach, rail at, taunt or upbraid. “The same” means the taunts the rulers had just used, save thyself, come down, if thou be the Son of God. Even the men dying beside him, under the same punishment, turned on him, and every voice around the cross was raised against him.

Did both thieves mock him?

Both thieves joined the mockery at first, and later one of them changed. Luke records that one rebuked the other, asked Jesus to remember him when he came into his kingdom, and heard the promise, “To day shalt thou be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:39–43). Matthew gives the opening hours, when both men railed on him, and Luke gives what happened later, when one of them turned to Jesus. The two accounts tell of the same hours from different points in them.

Mocked by Passers-by and Rulers

The passers-by

“They that passed by” (paraporeúomai, to travel near) were ordinary people on the road beside Golgotha, swelled by the Passover crowds in Jerusalem. They “reviled him”, blasphēméō, to vilify, rail on or speak impiously, the word used for blasphemy against God, and here it was hurled at the Son of God. “Wagging their heads” joins kinéō, to stir or move, and kephalḗ, the head, in a gesture of scorn and of triumph over someone fallen. David had written, “All they that see me laugh me to scorn: they shoot out the lip, they shake the head” (Psalm 22:6–8), and another psalm speaks of enemies shaking their heads (Psalm 109:25). Isaiah said the servant would be “despised and rejected of men” (Isaiah 53:3).

Their words twisted something Jesus had said: “Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself.” False witnesses had used the same claim against him at his trial (Matthew 26:61). What Jesus actually said, early in his ministry, was “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”, and John explains, “But he spake of the temple of his body” (John 2:19–21). The verb katalýō means to loosen down or demolish, and oikodoméō means to build. The mockers took his words of the stone temple in Jerusalem, and in their scorn they named the very thing that was about to happen. His body was being destroyed that day, and in three days he would raise it.

“If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross” uses the words Satan used in the wilderness, “If thou be the Son of God” (Matthew 4:3). The Father had already answered the question at the baptism and on the mountain of the transfiguration: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17, Matthew 17:5). “Save” is sṓzō, to save, deliver or protect, and the same verb comes back in verses 42 and 49. The mockers meant escape from the cross. Jesus was saving the world by staying on it, which is why Paul calls the preaching of the cross the power of God to those who are saved (1 Corinthians 1:18–25).

The rulers

“Likewise” (homoíōs, in the same way) the chief priests, scribes and elders joined in. The chief priests (archiereús) were the heads of the priesthood, mostly Sadducees, and they ran the temple. The scribes were experts in the Law of Moses, many of them Pharisees, and the elders were leading men of the people. Together they made up the council that had condemned Jesus. “Mocking” is empaízō, to jeer at or deride, the verb used for the soldiers’ mockery in the hall of the governor. The men who knew the Scriptures best stood at the foot of the cross and jeered at the One the Scriptures were about.

They spoke about him to the crowd: “He saved others; himself he cannot save.” The verb sṓzō stands behind both “saved” and “save”. “He saved others” admits what they could hardly deny, his healings and deliverances throughout his ministry. “He cannot save” is ou, “not”, with dýnamai, to be able, and they meant that he lacked the power. Jesus had told Peter in the garden that he could pray to his Father and at once be given twelve legions of angels and more (Matthew 26:53). His staying was the obedience of the Son, and the blood he was shedding was “my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28). The rulers spoke the truth in their scorn: to save others, he stayed.

“If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.” The title echoes the charge over his head, with the same word for king, and they demanded a sign of power that fitted their own idea of the Messiah. The resurrection three days later was a far greater sign, and still most of them refused to believe.

“He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God.” “Trusted” is peíthō, to persuade, and in the sense here, to trust or rely on. “Deliver” is rhýomai, to rescue or draw out. “If he will have him” uses thélō again, if God wants him, if God takes pleasure in him. “Son” is huiós. Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God was the ground of his condemnation, when the high priest put him on oath and the council judged him worthy of death (Matthew 26:63–66), and the leaders told Pilate that by their law he ought to die for making himself the Son of God (John 19:7). Their taunt repeats almost word for word what David wrote of the righteous sufferer: “He trusted on the LORD that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him” (Psalm 22:8). They fulfilled the psalm while mocking the One it described. The Father did delight in his Son, and he delivered him through the cross, raising him from the dead.

Why did Jesus stay on the cross when he had power to come down?

Jesus stayed on the cross because that was how he would save others. He came to “save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21) and to “give his life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28), and the way to do that was to die in their place. Peter writes that he “his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24). Coming down would have pleased the crowd and left us in our sins. He stayed until the work was done, and now, having died unto sin once, he lives unto God and death has lost its dominion over him (Romans 6:9–10). Through his blood we have redemption and are brought into the kingdom of God’s dear Son (Colossians 1:13–14).

Darkness over All the Land

“Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.” The sixth hour is about noon and the ninth about three in the afternoon, so for three hours in the middle of the day, when the sun is highest, the land went dark. The word skótos is darkness, literal or figurative. “There was” is gínomai, to become or come about, and it reports that darkness came. “Land” is gē, which can mean the earth, a land or the ground. Here “all the land” most likely means the whole region of Judea, so that everyone in and around Jerusalem saw it. Mark and Luke record the same darkness (Mark 15:33, Luke 23:44–45).

Was the darkness an eclipse?

The darkness was an act of God. Passover was always kept at the full moon, and an eclipse of the sun can only happen at the new moon, when the moon passes between the sun and the earth. At Passover an eclipse was impossible.

In Scripture darkness sent by God often marks his judgment. One of the plagues on Egypt was darkness (Exodus 10:21–23). Amos foretold a day when God would make the sun go down at noon (Amos 8:9–10), and Joel and Isaiah speak of the sun darkened at the day of the LORD (Joel 2:31, Isaiah 13:10). In these hours the Son was bearing the judgment due to our sin, made sin for us, and the darkness covered that holy and terrible work.

Jesus had said, “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12), and the light of the world went into the dark so that we could come out of it. The Father “hath delivered us from the power of darkness” (Colossians 1:13–14), Christ came “to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death” (Luke 1:79), believers are now “light in the Lord” (Ephesians 5:8), and God has called his people “out of darkness into his marvellous light” (1 Peter 2:9).

“My God, My God, Why Hast Thou Forsaken Me?”

“About the ninth hour”, as the darkness ended, “Jesus cried with a loud voice”. The verb anaboáō is to cry aloud, and the cry was loud enough for all around to hear. Jesus had been on the cross since the third hour, and the ninth hour was also the time of the evening sacrifice at the temple and an hour of prayer.

His words are given as he spoke them. The word ēlí is of Hebrew origin and means “my God”, spoken twice. The word lamá means “why”, and sabachtháni, an Aramaic word, means “thou hast left me”. Matthew then translates them: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” “Forsaken” is enkataleípō, to leave behind in a place, and in its bad sense to desert or abandon.

These are the opening words of Psalm 22:1. Every Jew who knew the Scriptures would have recognised them, and the psalm they begin goes on to describe the mocking, the pierced hands and feet (Psalm 22:16) and the parted garments, and ends with God’s deliverance and praise. Even in the depths, Jesus calls him “my God”. Earlier he had prayed for the men who crucified him, “Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34), and this cry is the deepest point of all his suffering.

Was the Son truly forsaken by the Father?

Jesus truly bore the forsakenness that sin deserves. The sinless One was made sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21) and “made a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13). God is “of purer eyes than to behold evil” (Habakkuk 1:13), and as the Son bore the sin of the world, the Father withdrew the comfort of his presence and poured out on him the judgment that sin brings. The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit remained one God, and the unity of the Godhead stayed whole. What the Son endured was a real and unique forsaking in the place of sinners, for the hours he bore our sin.

Because he was forsaken, those who belong to him are kept for ever. The promise “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee” (Hebrews 13:5) rests on this cry. The cry also shows us a Saviour who knows the deepest human anguish from the inside, a high priest “touched with the feeling of our infirmities” (Hebrews 4:15).

“This Man Calleth for Elias”

“Some of them that stood there” (ekeî again), “when they heard (akoúō) that”, said that Jesus was calling for Elijah. The name Hēlías is the Greek form of Elijah, and in the KJV it stands as Elias. “Calleth for” is phōnéō, to call out or summon. “Eli” sounded like the prophet’s name, and Israel was expecting Elijah, because God had said, “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD” (Malachi 4:5). Elijah had been taken up to heaven alive (2 Kings 2:11), and some looked for him to come and help those in distress. During Jesus’ ministry some people had even thought Jesus himself was Elias (Matthew 16:13–14).

Some may have misheard in earnest, and others twisted his words for one more jest. Either way, the cry of the Son to his Father was heard as a call for a prophet. Peter had misunderstood the cross in the same way when he rebuked Jesus for speaking of it (Matthew 16:21–23), and John writes of Jesus, “He came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:10–11).

The sponge of vinegar

“Straightway”, euthéōs, immediately, one of them ran (tréchō), took (lambánō) a sponge (spóngos), filled it (plḗthō) with vinegar, put it on (peritíthēmi, to place around) a reed (kálamos), and gave him to drink (potízō). The vinegar is óxos, the same word as in verse 34, cheap sour wine, often watered down. The reed lifted the sponge to the mouth of a man raised up on a cross. John records that this came after Jesus said “I thirst”, and that the sponge was put on hyssop (John 19:28–30), the plant Israel used in its rites of cleansing. Mark tells the same moment (Mark 15:35–36), and once more Psalm 69:21 was fulfilled.

The man’s motive is left open. He ran at once, which may show pity for a dying man’s thirst, or the sour drink may have been one more piece of mockery among people who were jeering. Whatever he meant, his act fulfilled Scripture. The reed recalls the one the soldiers had put in Jesus’ hand to mock him as king, and the bitter drink recalls the cup Jesus had asked his Father in Gethsemane to take from him, if it were possible (Matthew 26:39). He had come in the likeness of men (Philippians 2:5–11), and he thirsted as men thirst.

“Let us see whether Elias will come”

“The rest”, loipoí, the others, said, “Let be”, leave him alone, wait. “Let us see whether Elias will come to save him.” Here the verb sṓzō closes the passage, and the mockery of verse 40 and verse 42 comes round again. They waited for a prophet to rescue Jesus from death, while Jesus was saving them by his death. Moments later he cried again and yielded up the ghost, and the veil of the temple was torn and the earth shook (Matthew 27:50–54). Three days later he rose, “raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:25).

The Saviour Who Stayed on the Cross

This passage shows us the cross as God’s own plan, carried out to the letter. Psalm 22, Psalm 69 and Isaiah 53 were written long before, and soldiers, rulers and passers-by fulfilled them without knowing it. God’s word held in the darkest hour, and it holds now.

It shows us a Saviour who chose this death. He tasted the numbing drink and refused it. He was dared to come down and stayed. The silent servant of Isaiah, who “opened not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7), bore every taunt, and Peter writes that “when he was reviled, reviled not again” (1 Peter 2:23). The cup he drank was the new testament in his blood (Luke 22:20), and by the blood of his cross God has made peace and reconciled all things to himself (Colossians 1:19–20).

It shows us what our sin cost and how far God’s love went. The Son was counted among the transgressors and bore the darkness and the forsaking so that we would be brought into the light and kept by God for ever. If you belong to Christ, the cry of verse 46 was raised for you, and the promise that he will stay with you rests on it. Simon, pressed into service, walked behind Jesus with the cross on his shoulders, and the disciples of Jesus still take up their cross and follow him, carrying one another’s burdens as he carried ours.

Last revised

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

12 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

12 quotes · AD 367–1150
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
40050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 367Hilary of Poitiersas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Trin. x. 50 &c.) From these words heretical spirits contend either that God the Word was entirely absorbed into the soul at the time it discharged the function of a soul in quickening the body; or that Christ could not have been born man, because the Divine Word dwelt in Him after the manner of a prophetical spirit. As though Jesus Christ was a man of ordinary soul and body, having His beginning then when He began to be man, and thus now deserted upon the withdrawal of the protection of God's word cries out, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Or at least that the nature of the Word being transmuted into soul, Christ, who had depended in all things upon His Father's support, now deserted and left to death, mourns over this desertion, and pleads with Him departing. But amidst these impious and feeble opinions, the faith of the Church imbued with Apostolic teaching does not sever Christ that He should be considered as Son of God and not as Son of Man. The complaint of His being deserted is the weakness of the dying man; the promise of Paradise is the kingdom of the living God. You have Him complaining that He is left to death, and thus He is Man; you have Him as He is dying declaring that He reigns in Paradise; and thus He is God. Wonder not then at the humility of these words, when you know the form of a servant, and see the offence of the cross.

Vinegar is wine, which has turned sour either from neglect, or the fault of the vessel. Wine is the honour of immortality, or virtue. When this then had been turned sour in Adam, He took and drunk it at the hands of the Gentiles. It is offered to Him on a reed and a spunge; that is, He took from the bodies of the Gentiles immortality spoiled and corrupted, and transfused in Himself into a mixture of immortality that in us which was spoiled.

Or, He gave up the ghost with a loud voice, in grief that He was not carrying the sins of all men.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. lxxxviii.) This darkness lasted three hours, whereas an eclipse is transient, and not enduring, as they know who have studied the matter.

Or otherwise; The wonder was in this, that the darkness was over the whole earth, which had never come to pass before, save only in Egypt what time the Passover was celebrated; for the things done then were a type of these. And consider the time when this is done; at mid-day, while over the whole world it was day, that all the dwellers on the earth might perceive it. This is the sign He promised to them that asked Him, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh a sign, and there shall no sign be given it save the sign of Jonas the Prophet, (Matt. 12:39.) alluding to His cross and resurrection. And it was a much greater marvel that this should come to pass when He was fastened to the cross, than when He was walking at large on the earth. Surely here was enough to convert them, not by the greatness of the miracle alone, but because it was done not till after all these instances of their frenzy, when their passion was past, when they had uttered all that they would, and were satiated with taunts and gibes. But how did they not all marvel and conclude Him to be God? Because the human race was at that time plunged in exceeding sluggishness and vice, and this wonder was but one, and quickly past away, and none cared to search out its cause, or perhaps they attributed it to eclipse, or some other physical consequence. And on this account He shortly afterwards lifts up His voice to show that He yet lives, and Himself wrought this miracle; And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, &c.

He uttered this word of prophecy, that He might bear witness to the very last hour to the Old Testament, and that they might see that He honours the Father, and is not against God. And therefore too, He used the Hebrew tongue, that what He said might be intelligible to them.

Also for this reason He cried out with a loud voice to show that this is done by His own power. For by crying out with a loud voice when dying, He showed incontestably that He was the true God; because a man in dying can scarcely utter even a feeble sound.
This is the sign which before He had promised to give them when they asked it, saying, "An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign, and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas;" meaning His cross, and His death, His burial, and His resurrection. And again, declaring in another way the virtue of the cross, He said, "When ye have lifted up the Son of Man, then shall ye know that I am He." And what He saith is to this purport: "When ye have crucified me, and think ye have overcome me, then, above all, shall ye know my might."

For after the crucifixion, the city was destroyed, and the Jewish state came to an end, they fell away from their polity and their freedom, the gospel flourished, the word was spread abroad to the ends of the world; both sea and land, both the inhabited earth and the desert perpetually proclaim its power. These things then He meaneth, and those which took place at the very time of the crucifixion. For indeed it was much more marvellous that these things should be done, when He was nailed to the cross, than when He was walking on earth. And not in this respect only was the wonder, but because from heaven also was that done which they had sought, and it was over all the world, which had never before happened, but in Egypt only, when the passover was to be fulfilled. For indeed those events were a type of these.

And observe when it took place. At midday, that all that dwell on the earth may know it, when it was day all over the world; which was enough to convert them, not by the greatness of the miracle only, but also by its taking place in due season. For after all their insulting, and their lawless derision, this is done, when they had let go their anger, when they had ceased mocking, when they were satiated with their jeerings, and had spoken all that they were minded; then He shows the darkness, in order that at least so (having vented their anger) they may profit by the miracle. For this was more marvellous than to come down from the cross, that being on the cross He should work these things. For whether they thought He Himself had done it, they ought to have believed and to have feared; or whether not He, but the Father, yet thereby ought they to have been moved to compunction, for that darkness was a token of His anger at their crime. For that it was not an eclipse, but both wrath and indignation, is not hence alone manifest, but also by the time, for it continued three hours, but an eclipse takes place in one moment of time, and they know it, who have seen this; and indeed it hath taken place even in our generation.

And how, you may say, did not all marvel, and account Him to be God? Because the race of man was then held in a state of great carelessness and vice. And this miracle was but one, and when it had taken place, immediately passed away; and no one was concerned to inquire into the cause of it, and great was the prejudice and the habit of ungodliness. And they knew not what was the cause of that which took place, and they thought perhaps this happened so, in the way of an eclipse or some natural effect. And why dost thou marvel about them that are without, that knew nothing, neither inquired by reason of great indifference, when even those that were in Judaea itself, after so many miracles, yet continued using Him despitefully, although He plainly showed them that He Himself wrought this thing.
d. AD 420Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
He employed the beginning of the twenty-first Psalm. (Ps. 22:1. Vulg.) That clause in the middle of the verse, Look upon me, is superfluous; for the Hebrew has only 'Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani,' that is, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? It is impiety therefore to think that this Psalm was spoken in the character of David or Esther or Mardocheus, when passages taken out of it by the Evangelist are understood of the Saviour; as, They parted my garments among them, and, They pierced my hands.

It follows, Some of them that stood by, &c.; some, not all; whom I suppose to have been Roman soldiers, ignorant of Hebrew, but from the words Eli, Eli, thought that He called upon Elias. But if we prefer to suppose them Jews, they do it after their usual manner, that they may accuse the Lord of weakness in thus invoking Elias.

It was a mark of Divine power in Him thus to dismiss the Spirit as Himself had said, No man can take my life from me, but I lay it down and take it again. (John 10:18.) For by the ghost in this place we understand the soul; so called either because it is that which makes the body quick or spiritual, or because the substance of the soul itself is spirit, according to that which is written, Thou takest away their breath, and they die. (Ps. 104:29.)
d. AD 484Vigilius of Thapsusas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Vigil. cont. Felicianum. 14.) Far be from the faithful any suspicion that Christ experienced our death in such sort that life (as far as it can) ceased to live. Had this been so, how could aught have been said to live during that three days, if the Fountain of Life itself was dried up? Therefore Christ's Godhead experienced death through its partaking of humanity or of human feeling, which it had voluntarily taken on it; but it lost not the properties of its nature by which it gives life to all things. For when we die, without doubt the loss of life by the body is not the destruction of the soul, but the soul quitting the body loses not its own properties, but only lets go what it had quickened, and as far as in it lays produces the death of somewhat else, but itself defies death. To speak now of the Saviour's soul; it might depart without being itself destroyed from His body for this three days' space, even by the common laws of death, and without taking into account the indwelling Godhead, and His singular righteousness. For I believe that the Son of God died not in punishment of unrighteousness which He had not at all, but according to the law of that nature which He took upon Him for the redemption of the human race.
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Pseudo Chrys. in Hom. de Cruce et Latr. ubi sup.) Creation could not bear the outrage offered to the Creator; whence the sun withdrew his beams, that he might not look upon the crime of these impious men.

(Hom. vi. in Pass. [vol. iii. p. 733.]) Thus the Source of living water is made to drink vinegar, the Giver of honey is fed with gall; Forgiveness is scourged, Acquittance is condemned, Majesty is mocked, Virtue ridiculed, the Bestower of showers is repaid with spitting.
AD 532Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagiteas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(ad Polycarp. Ep. 7.) When we were together at Heliopolis, we both observed such an interference of the moon with the sun quite unexpectedly, for it was not the season of their conjunction; and then from the ninth hour until evening, beyond the power of nature, continuing in a direct line between us and the sun. And this obscuration we saw begin from the east, and so pass to the extreme of the sun's orb, and again return back the same way, being thus the very reverse of an ordinary eclipse.
d. AD 533Remigius of Rheimsas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or otherwise; The Jews as degenerating from the wine of the Patriarchs and Prophets were vinegar; they had deceitful hearts, like to the winding holes and hollows in spunge. By the reed, Sacred Scripture is denoted, which was fulfilled in this action; for as we call that which the tongue utters, the Hebrew tongue, or the Greek tongue, for example; so the writing, or letters which the seed produces, we may call a reed.
d. AD 749John Damasceneas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Fid. Orth. iii. 27.) Although He died as man, and His holy soul was separated from His unstained body, yet His Godhead remained inseparate from either body or soul. Yet was not the one Person divided into two; for as both body and soul had from the beginning an existence in the Person of the Word, so also had they in death. For neither soul nor body had ever a Person of their own, besides the Person of the Word.
d. AD 856Rabanus Maurusas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or, The Saviour said this as bearing about with Him our feelings, who when placed in dangers think ourselves forsaken by God. Human nature was forsaken by God because of its sins, and the Son of God becoming our Advocate laments the misery of those whose guilt He took upon Himf; there in showing how they who sin ought to mourn, when He who never sinned did thus mourn.

The soldiers misunderstanding the sound of the Lord's words, foolishly looked for the coming of Elias. But God, whom the Saviour thus invoked in the Hebrew tongue, He had ever inseparably with Him.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of OhridMedieval
. The darkness which occurred was not according to the natural order of events, as when a solar eclipse occurs in nature. For there is never a solar eclipse on the fourteenth day of the lunar cycle; rather, solar eclipses occur when there is a so-called "new moon." The day of the crucifixion was certainly the fourteenth day of the lunar cycle, as that is when the Jews celebrate the Passover. Therefore the incident was beyond nature. The darkness was universal, not partial as was the darkness in Egypt, to show that the whole of creation mourned the Passion of the Creator, and that the light had been taken from the Jews. Let those Jews who were asking for a sign from heaven now see the sun darkened. On the sixth day, when man had been created, and at the sixth hour, when he had eaten of the tree (for that is the hour of eating), the Lord, refashioning man and healing his sin, on the sixth day and at the sixth hour was stretched out on the tree. Jesus speaks prophetically in the Hebrew tongue to show that He does not contend with the Old Testament. He said, "Why hast Thou forsaken Me?" (Ps. 21:1). to show that He was truly man, and not just in appearance. For man avidly desires life and has a physical appetite for it. Just as Christ agonized and was sorely troubled before the cross, showing the fear that is ours by nature, so now He says, "Why hast Thou forsaken Me?" displaying our natural thirst for life. For He was truly man and like us in all respects, but without sins. Some have understood it in this manner: the Saviour spoke on behalf of the Jews and said, "Why hast Thou forsaken the Jewish race, O Father, that it should commit such a sin and be handed over to destruction?" For as Christ was one of the Jews, He said "forsaken Me," meaning, "Why hast Thou forsaken My kinsmen, My people, that they should bring such a great evil upon themselves?" The multitude did not understand His cry, being uncouth and ignorant of the prophets, and thought that He was calling upon Elijah. For not all the Jews knew the prophets, just as now not all Christians, perhaps, know the Gospel. They gave Him vinegar to drink so that He might die more quickly, before Elijah could come to help Him. This is why the others say, "Let be, let us see whether Elijah will come to save Him;" that is, "Do not make Him die, for we want to know if Elijah will help Him."
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) God is said to have forsaken Him in death because He exposed Him to the power of His persecutors; He withdrew His protection, but did not break the union.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Matthew 27:49 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8