Which was [the son] of Melea, which was [the son] of Menan, which was [the son] of Mattatha, which was [the son] of Nathan, which was [the son] of David,
Which was the son of Melea {G3190}, which was the son of Menan {G3104}, which was the son of Mattatha {G3160}, which was the son of Nathan {G3481}, which was the son of David {G1138},
of Mal'ah, of Manah, of Mattatah, of Natan, of David,
the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David,
the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David,
-
2 Samuel 5:14
And these [be] the names of those that were born unto him in Jerusalem; Shammua, and Shobab, and Nathan, and Solomon, -
1 Chronicles 3:5
And these were born unto him in Jerusalem; Shimea, and Shobab, and Nathan, and Solomon, four, of Bathshua the daughter of Ammiel: -
Zechariah 12:12
And the land shall mourn, every family apart; the family of the house of David apart, and their wives apart; the family of the house of Nathan apart, and their wives apart; -
1 Chronicles 14:4
Now these [are] the names of [his] children which he had in Jerusalem; Shammua, and Shobab, Nathan, and Solomon,
Luke 3:31 is a crucial link in the extensive genealogy of Jesus Christ presented in Luke's Gospel. Unlike Matthew's genealogy which traces Jesus's lineage forward from Abraham to Joseph, Luke’s account works backward from Joseph (or Heli, his father-in-law, understood as the father of Mary's line) all the way to Adam, emphasizing Jesus's universal humanity and divine sonship.
Context of Luke 3:31
This verse is part of a longer list found in Luke 3:23-38. Following the account of Jesus's baptism and the divine affirmation of His identity, Luke meticulously details His ancestry. The purpose of this genealogy is not merely historical record-keeping, but theological declaration. By tracing Jesus's line through Melea, Menan, Mattatha, and Nathan, this verse specifically highlights His direct descent from King David.
Key Themes and Significance
Linguistic Insight
The repetitive structure "which was [the son] of..." (Greek: tou, meaning "of" or "the son of") is characteristic of ancient genealogies. It emphasizes the direct, unbroken succession through generations, ensuring that the lineage from father to son is clearly established, even if "son" could sometimes imply a descendant rather than a direct son in a broader sense. In this specific context, it highlights the unbroken chain leading to David.
Practical Application
For believers today, Luke 3:31 reinforces the foundational truth that Jesus Christ is indeed the promised Messiah, the "root and the offspring of David" (Revelation 22:16). It reminds us that God's plan is meticulously unfolding through history, and His promises are trustworthy. Understanding Jesus's lineage provides a deeper appreciation for the fulfillment of prophecy and the historical grounding of our faith. It grounds the universal message of the Gospel in a specific, verifiable historical person.