Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 he said G2036, He that shewed G4160 mercy G1656 on G3326 him G846. Then G3767 said G2036 Jesus G2424 unto him G846, Go G4198, and G2532 do G4160 thou G4771 likewise G3668.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He answered, “The one who showed mercy toward him.” Yeshua said to him, “You go and do as he did.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“The one who showed him mercy,” replied the expert in the law. Then Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And he said, He that showed mercy on him. And Jesus said unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He said, “He who showed mercy on him.” Then Yeshua said to him, “Go and do likewise.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he saide, He that shewed mercie on him. Then said Iesus vnto him, Goe, and do thou likewise.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and he said, `He who did the kindness with him,' then Jesus said to him, `Be going on, and thou be doing in like manner.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' Final Return to Jerusalem in the Synoptic Gospels
Jesus' Final Return to Jerusalem in the Synoptic Gospels View full PDF
Luke 10:25-36
Luke 10:25-36 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,401 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 10:37 serves as the climactic conclusion to Jesus' Parable of the Good Samaritan, delivering a profound and actionable command that redefines the essence of neighborly love. Following the lawyer's reluctant acknowledgment of the Samaritan's compassionate actions, Jesus issues a direct imperative, urging not merely intellectual understanding of the law, but its active, self-sacrificial embodiment in daily life, thereby revealing the true path to inheriting eternal life through radical love.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is the culmination of a pivotal dialogue between Jesus and a lawyer, initiated by the lawyer's loaded question, "What shall I do to inherit eternal life?" (Luke 10:25). After Jesus directs him back to the Mosaic Law, the lawyer correctly identifies the two great commandments: to love God and to love one's neighbor. However, seeking to "justify himself," the lawyer then poses the follow-up question, "And who is my neighbour?" (Luke 10:29). Jesus responds not with a definition, but with the Parable of the Good Samaritan, a masterclass in narrative pedagogy. The parable vividly portrays a man left for dead, ignored by a priest and a Levite (figures of religious authority), but shown extraordinary compassion by a Samaritan (a member of a group despised by Jews). After recounting the Samaritan's costly and comprehensive care, Jesus turns the lawyer's original question on its head, asking, "Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?" The lawyer's answer, while avoiding the despised name "Samaritan," implicitly acknowledges the true neighbor. Jesus' subsequent command in Luke 10:37 is thus a direct, personal application of the parable's truth, moving from intellectual assent to ethical imperative.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The animosity between Jews and Samaritans was deeply entrenched, stemming from historical, religious, and ethnic differences, including disputes over proper worship sites and interpretations of the Torah. Jews considered Samaritans ritually impure and heretical, often avoiding all contact with them. Against this backdrop, Jesus' choice of a Samaritan as the hero of the parable was revolutionary and provocative, challenging the lawyer's (and the audience's) ethnocentric prejudices. Priests and Levites, on the other hand, were figures of religious piety and authority within Judaism; their failure to help the injured man would have been particularly shocking to Jesus' Jewish audience, perhaps even more so than the Samaritan's compassion. The road from Jerusalem to Jericho, where the incident occurs, was notorious for its dangers, being a desolate, winding path prone to banditry. The Samaritan's actions—binding wounds, pouring oil and wine (antiseptic and soothing agents), placing the man on his own animal, taking him to an inn, and promising further payment—were not merely acts of charity but significant personal sacrifice, involving time, resources, and risk.
  • Key Themes: Luke 10:37 powerfully encapsulates several major themes central to Jesus' teaching and the broader Lukan narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Active Mercy and Compassion, emphasizing that true love for neighbor is not a passive feeling but a tangible, costly act of benevolence toward those in need, regardless of their background. The Samaritan's actions exemplify the kind of practical kindness that echoes the Old Testament call to care for the vulnerable, as seen in passages like Proverbs 19:17. Secondly, the verse, through the parable it concludes, presents a radical Redefinition of "Neighbor." Jesus shatters the narrow, ethnocentric understanding of neighbor prevalent in His day, expanding it to include anyone in need, even those traditionally considered enemies or outsiders. This challenges all forms of prejudice and discrimination, aligning with Jesus' broader mission to bring salvation to all peoples, as highlighted throughout Luke's Gospel. Thirdly, Jesus' command, "Go, and do thou likewise," highlights the theme of Obedience Through Action. It moves beyond mere intellectual understanding or theological debate to demand practical application of God's law. This resonates with the New Testament emphasis that genuine faith is demonstrated through works of love and mercy, as articulated in James 2:17. Finally, the parable and its concluding command illuminate a core aspect of Discipleship, calling believers to embody the second great commandment—to love one's neighbor as oneself—without reservation, discrimination, or self-justification, making it a hallmark of true followers of Christ.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • mercy (Greek, éleos, G1656): This term (G1656) denotes compassion, often active in nature, whether human or divine. In the context of the lawyer's answer, "He that shewed mercy on him," it refers specifically to the Samaritan's demonstrated, tangible pity and assistance. It is not merely a feeling but a benevolent act.
  • do (Greek, poiéō, G4160): This versatile verb (G4160) means "to make or do" in a very wide application. When the lawyer states "He that shewed mercy on him," the underlying Greek implies "he who did mercy" or "he who made mercy happen." In Jesus' subsequent command, "Go, and do thou likewise," poiéō carries the imperative force of actively performing or carrying out the same kind of merciful actions. It emphasizes the necessity of putting compassion into practice.
  • likewise (Greek, homoíōs, G3668): This adverb (G3668) means "similarly" or "in the same way." Jesus' command "Go, and do thou likewise" is a direct and forceful imperative to imitate the Samaritan's specific, active, and self-sacrificial compassion. It demands not just general goodness, but a replication of the Samaritan's radical, barrier-breaking love.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he said, He that shewed mercy on him.": This phrase captures the lawyer's reluctant yet accurate answer to Jesus' question, "Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?" The lawyer avoids uttering the despised name "Samaritan," instead identifying the true neighbor by his actions: "He that shewed mercy." This demonstrates that even the lawyer, despite his initial self-justifying posture, could not deny the evident compassion displayed by the Samaritan. His answer implicitly affirms that true neighborliness is defined by active benevolence, not by ethnic or religious affiliation.
  • "Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.": This is Jesus' direct and powerful command, the culmination of the entire dialogue and parable. The imperative "Go" signifies a call to action, to move beyond intellectual understanding or passive agreement. "Do thou likewise" is a clear directive to imitate the Samaritan's example of active, costly, and indiscriminate mercy. It is a call to embody the very spirit of the law in practical, compassionate deeds, thereby demonstrating genuine love for one's neighbor and, by extension, for God. This command transforms the abstract question of "who is my neighbor?" into the concrete imperative of "be a neighbor."

Literary Devices

The passage employs several potent literary devices. Irony is prominent, as the despised Samaritan, an outsider, becomes the exemplary figure of neighborly love, while the religiously esteemed priest and Levite fail in their moral duty. This subverts the audience's expectations and challenges their prejudices. Jesus' use of a Parable is itself a powerful didactic device, allowing for complex moral and theological truths to be conveyed through a relatable narrative, engaging the listener's imagination and conscience more effectively than a direct lecture. The concluding command, "Go, and do thou likewise," is an Imperative Mood, highlighting the urgency and non-negotiable nature of Jesus' call to action. Furthermore, the entire interaction serves as a prime example of Didacticism, where Jesus uses a real-life scenario and a compelling story to teach a fundamental truth about God's law and the nature of true righteousness, compelling His listener to self-reflection and transformation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 10:37 stands as a theological cornerstone, asserting that authentic love for God is inextricably linked to active, indiscriminate love for humanity. It transcends mere sentiment or intellectual assent, demanding a costly, practical engagement with the suffering of others. The parable and Jesus' command dismantle the human tendency to define "neighbor" narrowly, based on social, ethnic, or religious boundaries, instead broadening the scope to encompass anyone in need. This radical inclusivity reflects God's own expansive love, which extends to all people, regardless of their background or perceived worth. The passage underscores that true righteousness is not found in ritualistic observance or theological debate alone, but in compassionate action that mirrors the very heart of God. It challenges believers to move from asking "Who is my neighbor?" to becoming a neighbor to those in need, embodying the self-giving love that is the essence of God's character and the hallmark of His kingdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 10:37 is not merely a historical account but a timeless call to action for every believer. It challenges us to examine our own hearts and ask whether our understanding of "neighbor" is truly aligned with Christ's expansive definition. In a world often fractured by division, prejudice, and indifference, Jesus' command compels us to look beyond our comfort zones, our social circles, and our preconceived notions of who is "deserving" of our compassion. It calls us to actively seek out opportunities to serve, to alleviate suffering, and to extend kindness to those who are marginalized, overlooked, or even considered adversaries. This means moving beyond passive pity to proactive engagement, using our time, resources, and gifts to meet tangible needs, just as the Samaritan did. Our faith is not truly lived until it is expressed in concrete acts of love that break down barriers and demonstrate the transformative power of God's grace in a hurting world.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific ways do I tend to define "neighbor" too narrowly, perhaps limiting my compassion to those who are like me or who I deem worthy?
  • What practical steps can I take this week to "go and do likewise" by actively showing mercy to someone outside my usual circle or comfort zone?
  • How does the Samaritan's costly compassion challenge my own willingness to sacrifice time, resources, or personal convenience for the sake of others?
  • In what areas of my life might I be prioritizing intellectual understanding or religious ritual over tangible acts of love and service?

FAQ

What is the primary message of "Go, and do thou likewise" in Luke 10:37?

Answer: The primary message of "Go, and do thou likewise" is a direct, imperative call to action, urging believers to embody the radical, self-sacrificial, and indiscriminate compassion demonstrated by the Samaritan in the parable. It shifts the focus from merely knowing the law or defining "neighbor" intellectually to actively becoming a neighbor to anyone in need, regardless of their background or one's personal feelings towards them. Jesus' command emphasizes that true righteousness and the path to eternal life are found not in theological debate or ritualistic observance, but in tangible acts of love and mercy that transcend social, ethnic, and religious boundaries, mirroring God's own expansive love for humanity. It is a command to live out the second great commandment—to love one's neighbor as oneself—in practical, costly ways, making compassion the defining characteristic of one's life, as Jesus Himself exemplified throughout His ministry (Matthew 9:36).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 10:37, with its profound command to "Go, and do thou likewise," finds its ultimate and most glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ Himself. While the Samaritan serves as an exemplary figure, Jesus is the quintessential "Good Samaritan," who, out of boundless compassion, came to a humanity left spiritually "half dead" by sin, stripped and wounded by the fall. He did not pass by, but "had compassion" on us (Matthew 9:36), pouring out the healing balm of His grace and the cleansing wine of His atoning blood. He bore our burdens, carried us to the inn of His Church, and promised to return, having paid the full price for our restoration (Isaiah 53:4-5). Jesus' entire life was an embodiment of the radical love He commanded, culminating in His ultimate sacrifice on the cross, where He laid down His life for His "enemies" (Romans 5:8). Therefore, when Jesus tells the lawyer to "do likewise," He is not merely asking for an imitation of the Samaritan, but an imitation of Himself. He is calling His followers to participate in His own mission of redemptive love, to be agents of His compassion in a broken world, empowered by the very Spirit of God (John 13:34-35). To "do likewise" is to live a Christ-like life, extending grace and mercy to all, especially the marginalized and despised, reflecting the very heart of the One who came not to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45).

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 10 verses 25–37

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

We have here Christ's discourse with a lawyer about some points of conscience, which we are all concerned to be rightly informed in and are so here from Christ though the questions were proposed with no good intention.

I. We are concerned to know what that good is which we should do in this life, in order to our attaining eternal life. A question to this purport was proposed to our Saviour by a certain lawyer, or scribe, only with a design to try him, not with a desire to be instructed by him, Luk 10:25. The lawyer stood up, and asked him, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? If Christ had any thing peculiar to prescribe, by this question he would get it out of him, and perhaps expose him for it; if not, he would expose his doctrine as needless, since it would give no other direction for obtaining happiness than what they had already received; or, perhaps, he had no malicious design against Christ, as some of the scribes had, only he was willing to have a little talk with him, just as people go to church to hear what the minister will say. This was a good question: What shall I do to inherit eternal life? But it lost all its goodness when it was proposed with an ill design, or a very mean one. Note, It is not enough to speak of the things of God, and to enquire about them, but we must do it with a suitable concern. If we speak of eternal life, and the way to it, in a careless manner, merely as matter of discourse, especially as matter of dispute, we do but take the name of God in vain, as the lawyer here did. Now this question being started, observe,

1.How Christ turned him over to the divine law, and bade him follow the direction of that. Though he knew the thoughts and intents of his heart, he did not answer him according to the folly of that, but according to the wisdom and goodness of the question he asked. He answered him with a question: What is written in the law? How readest thou? Luk 10:26. He came to catechize Christ, and to know him; but Christ will catechize him, and make him know himself. He talks to him as a lawyer, as one conversant in the law: the studies of his profession would inform him; let him practise according to his knowledge, and he should not come short of eternal life. Note, It will be of great use to us, in our way to heaven, to consider what is written in the law, and what we read there. We must have recourse to our bibles, to the law, as it is now in the hand of Christ and walk in the way that is shown us there. It is a great mercy that we have the law written, that we have it thereby reduced to certainty, and that thereby it is capable of spreading the further, and lasting the longer. Having it written, it is our duty to read it, to read it with understanding, and to treasure up what we read, so that when there is occasion, we may be able to tell what is written in the law, and how we read. To this we must appeal; by this we must try doctrines and end disputes; this must be our oracle, our touchstone, our rule, our guide. What is written in the law? How do we read? if there be light in us, it will have regard to this light.

2.What a good account he gave of the law, of the principal commandments of the law, to the observance of which we must bind ourselves if we would inherit eternal life. He did not, like a Pharisee, refer himself to the tradition of the elders, but, like a good textuary, fastened upon the two first and great commandments of the law, as those which he thought must be most strictly observed in order to the obtaining of eternal life, and which included all the rest, Luk 10:27. (1.) We must love God with all our hearts, must look upon him as the best of beings, in himself most amiable, and infinitely perfect and excellent; as one whom we lie under the greatest obligations to, both in gratitude and interest. We must prize him, and value ourselves by our elation to him; must please ourselves in him, and devote ourselves entirely to him. Our love to him must be sincere, hearty, and fervent; it must be a superlative love, a love that is as strong as death, but an intelligent love, and such as we can give a good account of the grounds and reasons of. It must be an entire love; he must have our whole souls, and must be served with all that is within us. We must love nothing besides him, but what we love for him and in subordination to him. (2.) We must love our neighbours as ourselves, which we shall easily do, if we, as we ought to do, love God better than ourselves. We must wish well to all and ill to none; must do all the good we can in the world and no hurt, and must fix it as a rule to ourselves to do to others as we would they should do to us; and this is to love our neighbour as ourselves.

3.Christ's approbation of what he said, Luk 10:28. Though he came to tempt him, yet what he said that was good Christ commended: Thou hast answered right. Christ himself fastened upon these as the two great commandments of the law (Mat 22:37): both sides agreed in this. Those who do well shall have praise of the same, and so should those have that speak well. So far is right; but he hardest part of this work yet remains: "This do, and thou shalt live; thou shalt inherit eternal life."

4.His care to avoid the conviction which was now ready to fasten upon him. When Christ said, This do, and thou shalt live, he began to be aware that Christ intended to draw from him an acknowledgment that he had not done this, and therefore an enquiry what he should do, which way he should look, to get his sins pardoned; an acknowledgment also that he could not do this perfectly for the future by any strength of his own, and therefore an enquiry which way he might fetch in strength to enable him to do it: but he was willing to justify himself, and therefore cared not for carrying on that discourse, but saith, in effect, as another did (Mat 19:20), All these things have I kept from my youth up. Note, Many ask good questions with a design rather to justify themselves than to inform themselves, rather proudly to show what is good in them than humbly to see what is bad in them.

II. We are concerned to know who is our neighbour, whom by the second great commandment we are obliged to love. This is another of this lawyer's queries, which he started only that he might drop the former, lest Christ should have forced him, in the prosecution of it, to condemn himself, when he was resolved to justify himself. As to loving God, he was willing to say no more of it; but, as to his neighbour, he was sure that there he had come up to the rule, for he had always been very kind and respectful to all about him. Now observe,

1.What was the corrupt notion of the Jewish teachers in this matter. Dr. Lightfoot quotes their own words to this purport: "Where he saith, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, he excepts all Gentiles, for they are not our neighbours, but those only that are of our own nation and religion." They would not put an Israelite to death for killing a Gentile, for he was not his neighbour: they indeed say that they ought not to kill a Gentile whom they were not at war with; but, if they saw a Gentile in danger of death, they thought themselves under no obligation to help to save his life. Such wicked inferences did they draw from that holy covenant of peculiarity by which God had distinguished them, and by abusing it thus they had forfeited it; God justly took the forfeiture, and transferred covenant-favours to the Gentile world, to whom they brutishly denied common favours.

2.How Christ corrected this inhuman notion, and showed, by a parable, that whomsoever we have need to receive kindness fRom. and find ready to show us the kindness we need, we cannot but look upon as our neighbour; and therefore ought to look upon all those as such who need our kindness, and to show them kindness accordingly, though they be not of our own nation and religion. Now observe,

(1.)The parable itself, which represents to us a poor Jew in distressed circumstances, succoured and relieved by a good Samaritan. Let us see here,

[1.]How he was abused by his enemies. The honest man was traveling peaceably upon his lawful business in the road, and it was a great road that led from Jerusalem to Jericho, Luk 10:30. The mentioning of those places intimates that it was matter of fact, and not a parable; probably it happened lately, just as it is here related. The occurrences of Providence would yield us many good instructions, if we would carefully observe and improve them, and would be equivalent to parables framed on purpose for instruction, and be more affecting. This poor man fell among thieves. Whether they were Arabians, plunderers, that lived by spoil, or some profligate wretches of his own nation, or some of the Roman soldiers, who, notwithstanding the strict discipline of their army, did this villany, does not appear; but they were very barbarous; they not only took his money, but stripped him of his clothes, and, that he might not be able to pursue them, or only to gratify a cruel disposition (for otherwise what profit was there in his blood?) they wounded him, and left him half dead, ready to die of his wounds. We may here conceive a just indignation at highwaymen, that have divested themselves of all humanity, and are as natural brute beasts, beasts of prey, made to be taken and destroyed; and at the same time we cannot but think with compassion on those that fall into the hands of such wicked and unreasonable men, and be ready, when it is in our power, to help them. What reason have we to thank God for our preservation from perils by robbers!

[2.]How he was slighted by those who should have been his friends, who were not only men of his own nation and religion, but one a priest and the other a Levite, men of a public character and station; nay, they were men of professed sanctity, whose offices obliged them to tenderness and compassion (Heb 5:2), who ought to have taught others their duty in such a case as this, which was to deliver them that were drawn unto death; yet they would not themselves do it. Dr. Lightfoot tells us that many of the courses of the priests had their residence in Jericho, and thence came up to Jerusalem, when it was their turn to officiate there, and so back again, which occasioned abundance of passing and repassing of priests that way, and Levites their attendants. They came this way, and saw the poor wounded man. It is probable that they heard his groans, and could not but perceive that if he were not helped he must quickly perish. The Levite not only saw him, but came and looked on him Luk 10:32. But they passed by on the other side; when they saw his case, they got as far off him as ever they could, as if they would have had a pretence to say, Behold, we knew it not. It is sad when those who should be examples of charity are prodigies of cruelty, and when those who should by displaying the mercies of God, open the bowels of compassion in others, shut up their own.

[3.]How he was succoured and relieved by a stranger, a certain Samaritan, of that nation which of all others the Jews most despised and detested and would have no dealings with. This man had some humanity in him, Luk 10:33. The priest had his heart hardened against one of his own people, but the Samaritan had his opened towards one of another people. When he saw him he had compassion on him, and never took into consideration what country he was of. Though he was a Jew, he was a man, and a man in misery, and the Samaritan has learned to honour all men; he knows not how soon this poor man's case may be his own, and therefore pities him, as he himself would desire and expect to be pitied in the like case. That such great love should be found in a Samaritan was perhaps thought as wonderful as that great faith which Christ admired in a Roman, and in a woman of Canaan; but really it was not so, for pity is the work of a man, but faith is the work of divine grace. The compassion of this Samaritan was not an idle compassion; he did not think it enough to say, "Be healed, be helped" (Jam 2:16); but, when he drew out his soul, he reached forth his hand also to this poor needy creature, Isa 58:7, Isa 58:10; Pro 31:20. See how friendly this good Samaritan was. First, He went to the poor man, whom the priest and Levite kept at a distance from; he enquired, no doubt, how he came into this deplorable condition, and condoled with him. Secondly, He did the surgeon's part, for want of a better. He bound up his wounds, making use of his own linen, it is likely, for that purpose; and poured in oil and wine, which perhaps he had with him; wine to wash the wound, and oil to mollify it, and close it up. He did all he could to ease the pain, and prevent the peril, of his wounds, as one whose heart bled with him. Thirdly, He set him on his own beast, and went on foot himself, and brought him to an inn. A great mercy it is to have inns upon the road, where we may be furnished for our money with all the conveniences for food and rest. Perhaps the Samaritan, if he had not met with this hindrance, would have got that night to his journey's end; but, in compassion to that poor man, he takes up short at an inn. Some think that the priest and Levite pretended they could not stay to help the poor man, because they were in haste to go and attend the temple-service at Jerusalem. We suppose the Samaritan went upon business; but he understood that both his own business and God's sacrifice too must give place to such an act of mercy as this. Fourthly, He took care of him in the inn, got him to bed, had food for him that was proper, and due attendance, and, it may be, prayed with him. Nay, Fifthly, As if he had been his own child, or one he was obliged to look after, when he left him next morning, he left money with the landlord, to be laid out for his use, and passed his word for what he should spend more. Twopence of their money was about fifteen pence of ours, which, according to the rate of things then, would go a great way; however, here it was an earnest of satisfaction to the full of all demands. All this was kind and generous, and as much as one could have expected from a friend or a brother; and yet here it is done by a stranger and foreigner.

Now this parable is applicable to another purpose than that for which it was intended; and does excellently set forth the kindness and love of God our Saviour towards sinful miserable man. We were like this poor distressed traveller. Satan, our enemy, had robbed us, stripped us, wounded us; such is the mischief that sin had done us. We were by nature more than half dead, twice dead, in trespasses and sins; utterly unable to help ourselves, for we were without strength. The law of Moses, like the priest and Levite, the ministers of the law, looks upon us, but has no compassion on us, gives us no relief, passes by on the other side, as having neither pity nor power to help us; but then comes the blessed Jesus, that good Samaritan (and they said of him, by way of reproach, he is a Samaritan), he has compassion on us, he binds up our bleeding wounds (Psa 147:3; Isa 61:1), pours in, not oil and wine, but that which is infinitely more precious, his own blood. He takes care of us, and bids us put all the expenses of our cure upon his account; and all this though he was none of us, till he was pleased by his voluntary condescension to make himself so, but infinitely above us. This magnifies the riches of his love, and obliges us all to say, "How much are we indebted, and what shall we render?"

(2.)The application of the parable. [1.] The truth contained in it is extorted from the lawyer's own mouth. "Now tell me," saith Christ, "which of these three was neighbour to him that fell among thieves (Luk 10:36), the priest, the Levite, or the Samaritan? Which of these did the neighbour's part?" To this the lawyer would not answer, as he ought to have done, "Doubtless, the Samaritan was;" but, "He that showed mercy on him; doubtless, he was a good neighbour to him, and very neighbourly, and I cannot but say that it was a good work thus to save an honest Jew from perishing." [2.] The duty inferred from it is pressed home upon the lawyer's own conscience: Go, and do thou likewise. The duty of relations is mutual and reciprocal; the titles of friends, brethren, neighbours, are, as Grotius here speaks tōn pros ti - equally binding on both sides: if one side be bound, the other cannot be loose, as is agreed in all contracts. If a Samaritan does well that helps a distressed Jew, certainly a Jew does not well if he refuses in like manner to help a distressed Samaritan. Petimusque damusque vicissim - These kind offices are to be reciprocated. "And therefore go thou and do as the Samaritan did, whenever occasion offers: show mercy to those that need thy help, and do it freely, and with concern and compassion, though they be not of thy own nation and thy own profession, or of thy own opinion and communion in religion. Let thy charity be thus extensive, before thou boastest of having conformed thyself to that great commandment of loving thy neighbour." This lawyer valued himself much upon his learning and his knowledge of the laws, and in that he thought to have puzzled Christ himself; but Christ sends him to school to a Samaritan, to learn his duty: "Go, and do like him." Note, It is the duty of every one of us, in our places, and according to our ability, to succour, help, and relieve all that are in distress and necessity, and of lawyers particularly; and herein we must study to excel many that are proud of their being priests and Levites.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 25–37. Public domain.
Copy as
Pseudo-Augustine (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hypognos. lib. 3.) Or by Jerusalem, which is by interpretation "the sight of peace," we mean Paradise, for before man sinned he was in sight of peace, that is, in paradise; whatever he saw was peace, and going thence he descended (as if brought low and made wretched by sin) into Jericho, that is, the world, in which all things that are born die as the moon.

(ubi sup.) For the half dead has his vital function (that is, free will) wounded, in that he is not able to return to the eternal life which he has lost. And therefore he lay, because he had not strength of his own sufficient to rise and seek a physician, that is, God, to heal him.

(ubi sup.) Seeing him lying down weak and motionless. And therefore was He moved with compassion, because He saw in him nothing to merit a cure, but He Himself for sin condemned sin in the flesh. (Rom. 8:3.) Hence it follows, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine.
Basil of Caesarea (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 379
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
This interpretation corresponds to the places, if any one will examine them. For Jericho lies in the low parts of Palestine, Jerusalem is seated on an eminence, occupying the crest of a mountain. The man then came from the high parts to the low, to fall into the hands of the robbers who infested the desert. As it follows, And he fell among thieves.

Or it may be understood that they stripped us after first inflicting wounds; or wounds precede nakedness, as sin precedes the absence of grace.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Commentary on Luke
Since no one is closer than he who tended to our wounds, let us love him as our Lord, and let us love him as our neighbor. Nothing is so close as the head to the members. Let us also love him who is the follower of Christ, let us love him who in unity of body has compassion on another’s need.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
He answered that he knew not his neighbour, because he believed not on Christ, and he who knows not Christ knows not the law, for being ignorant of the truth, how can he know the law which makes known the truth?

But who are those robbers but the Angels of night and darkness, among whom he had not fallen, unless by deviating from the divine command he had placed himself in their way.

Or they stripped us of the garments which we have received of spiritual grace, and so are wont to inflict wounds. For if we keep the unspotted garments we have put on, we can not feel the wounds of robbers.

Now this Samaritan was also coming down. For who is he that ascended upon into heaven, but he who came down from heaven, even the Son of Man who is in heaven (John 3:13.).

Now when He came He was made very near to us by His taking upon Himself our infirmities, He became a neighbour by bestowing compassion. Hence it follows, And when he saw him he was moved with compassion.

Or, He binds up our wounds by a stricter commandment, as by oil he soothes by the remission of sin, as by wine he pricks to the heart by the denunciation of judgment.

Or, He places us on His beast in that He bears our sins, and is afflicted for us, (Isai. 53:4, LXX) for man hath been made like to the beasts, (Ps. 49:12) therefore He placed us on His beast, that we might not be as horse and mule, (Ps. 32:9.) in order that by taking upon Him our body, He might abolish the weakness of our flesh.

But as the Samaritan had not time to stay longer on the earth, he must needs return to the place whence he descended, as it follows, And on the morrow he took out two pence, &c. (Ps. 118:24.) What is that morrow, but perchance the day of our Lord's resurrection? of which it was said, This is the day the Lord hath made. But the two pence are the two covenants, which bear stamped on them the image of the eternal King, by the price of which our wounds are healed.

Blessed then is that inn-keeper who is able to cure the wounds of another; blessed is he to whom Jesus says, Whatsoever thou hast spent more, when I come again I will repay thee. But when wilt thou return, O Lord, save on the Judgment day? For though Thou art ever every where, and though standing in the midst of us, art not perceived by us, yet the time will be in which all flesh shall behold Thee coming again. Thou wilt then restore what Thou owest to the blessed, whose debtor Thou art. Would that we were confident debtors, that we could pay what we had received!

For relationship does not make a neighbour, but compassion, for compassion is according to nature. For nothing is so natural as to assist one who shares our nature.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. in loc. Ed. Lat.) First, we must needs pity the ill fortune of the man who fell unarmed and helpless among robbers, and who was so rash and unwise as to choose the road in which he could not escape the attack of robbers. For the unarmed can never escape the armed, the heedless the villain, the unwary the malicious. Since malice is ever armed with guile, fenced round with cruelty, fortified with deceit, and ready for fierce attack.

(ubi sup.) At the beginning of the world then the devil accomplished his treacherous attack upon man, against whom he practised the poison of deceit, and directed all the deadliness of his malice.

(ubi sup.) Here then was man (that is, Adam) lying destitute of the aid of salvation, pierced with the wounds of his sins, whom neither Aaron the high priest passing by could advantage by his sacrifice; for it follows, And by chance there came down a certain priest that way, and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. Nor again could his brother Moses the Levite assist him by the Law, as it follows, And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.

(Hom. in loc.) Or, he poured in wine, that is, the blood of His passion, and oil, that is, the anointing of the chrism, that pardon might be granted by His blood, sanctification be conferred by the chrism. The wounded parts are bound up by the heavenly Physician, and containing a salve within themselves, are by the working of the remedy restored to their former soundness. Having poured in wine and oil, he placed him upon His beast, as it follows, and placing him upon his beast, &c.

(ut sup.) For the Inn is the Church, which receives travellers, who are tired with their journey through the world, and oppressed with the load of their sins; where the wearied traveller casting down the burden of his sins is relieved, and after being refreshed is restored with wholesome food. And this is what is here said, and took care of him. For without is every thing that is conflicting, hurtful and evil, while within the Inn is contained all rest and health.

(in Heb. Hom. 10.) As if He said, If thou seest any one oppressed, say not, Surely he is wicked; but be he Gentile or Jew and need help, dispute not, he has a claim to thy assistance, into whatever evil he has fallen.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION 33
God our Lord wished to be called our neighbor. The Lord Jesus Christ meant that he was the one who gave help to the man lying half-dead on the road, beaten and left by the robbers. The prophet said in prayer, "As a neighbor and as one's own brother, so did I please." Since the divine nature is far superior and above our human nature, the command by which we are to love God is distinct from our love of our neighbor. He shows mercy to us because of his own goodness, while we show mercy to one another because of God's goodness. He has compassion on us so that we may enjoy him completely, while we have compassion on another that we may completely enjoy him.
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(de. Doc. Chris. lib. i. c. 30.) Hereby we understand that he is our neighbour, to whomsoever we must show the duty of compassion, if he need it, or would have shown if he had needed it. From which it follows, that even he who must in his turn show us this duty, is our neighbour. For the name of neighbour has relation to something else, nor can any one be a neighbour, save to a neighbour; but that no one is excluded to whom the office of mercy is to be denied, is plain to all; as our Lord says, Do good to them that hate you. (Matt. 5:44.) Hence it is clear, that in this command by which we are bid to love our neighbour, the holy angels are included, by whom such great offices of mercy are bestowed upon us. Therefore our Lord Himself wished also to be called our neighbour, representing Himself to have assisted the half dead man who lay in the way.
Cyril of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 444
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
After what has gone before, our Lord fitly questions the lawyer; Which of these three thinkest thou was neighbour to him who fell among thieves? But he said, He that showed mercy on him. For neither Priest nor Levite became neighbour to the sufferer, but he only who had compassion on him. For vain is the dignity of the Priesthood, and the knowledge of the Law, unless they are confirmed by good works. Hence it follows, And Jesus saith unto him, Go and do thou likewise.
Gregory the Dialogist (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 604
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(20. Moral. c. 8.) Or in the wine he applies the sharpness of constraint, in the oil the softness of mercy. By wine let the corrupt parts be washed, by oil let the healing parts be assuaged; we must then mix gentleness with severity, and we must so combine the two, that those who are put under us be neither exasperated by our excessive harshness, nor be relaxed by too much kindness.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But sins are called wounds, because the perfectness of human nature is violated by them. And they departed, not by ceasing to lie in wait, but by hiding the craft of their devices.

And rightly He brought him placed on His beast, since no one, except he be united to Christ's body by Baptism, shall enter the Church.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
And Jesus said to him: Go and do likewise. That is, so that you may truly show that you love your neighbor as yourself, perform with devotion whatever you can to help his spiritual necessity.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Now our Saviour defines a neighbour not in respect of actions or honour, but of nature; as if He says, Think not that because thou art righteous thou hast no neighbour, for all who partake of the same nature are thy neighbours. Be thou also their neighbour, not in place, but in affection and solicitude for them. And in addition to this, he brings forward the Samaritan as an example. As it follows, And Jesus answering him said, A certain man went down, &c.

Now he says not "descended," but "was descending." For human nature was ever tending downwards, and not for a time only, but throughout busied about a life liable to suffering.

Or man after sin is said to be half dead, because his soul is immortal, but his body mortal, so that the half of man is under death. Or, because his human nature hoped to obtain salvation in Christ, so as not altogether to lie under death. But in that Adam had sinned death entered in the world, (Rom. 5:12.) in the righteousness of Christ death was to be destroyed.

But He says, passed by, (Rom. 3:20; 8:3.) because the Law came and stood till its time foreordained, then, not being able to cure, departed. Mark also that the Law was not given with this previous intention that it should cure man, for man could not from the beginning receive the mystery of Christ. And therefore it is said, And by chance there came a certain priest, which expression we use with respect to those things which happen without forethought.

They pitied him, I say, when they thought about him, but afterwards, overcome by selfishness, they went away again. For this is signified by the word, passed him by.

But He says, journeying, as though He purposely determined this in order to cure us.

Or else, intercourse with man is the oil, and intercourse with God is the wine which signifies divinity, which no one can endure unmixed unless oil be added, that is, human intercourse. Hence he worked some things humanly, some divinely. He poured then in oil and wine, as having saved us both by His human and His divine nature.

Or He placed us on His beast, that is, on His body. For He hath made us His members, and partakers of His body. The Law indeed did not take in all the Moabites, and the Ammonites shall not enter into the Church of God; (Deut. 23:3.) but now in every nation he that feareth the Lord is accepted by Him, who is willing to believe and to become part of the Church. Wherefore He says, that he brought him to an inn.
Ancient Greek Expositor (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Severus) He has well used the general term. For He says not, "a certain one went down," but, a certain man, for his discourse was of the whole human race.

(Severus.) Now Christ here fully calls Himself a Samaritan. For in addressing the lawyer who was glorying in the Law, He wished to express that neither Priest nor Levite, nor all they who were conversant with the Law, fulfilled the requirements of the Law, but He came to accomplish the ordinances of the Law.

Or He came by the way. For He was a true traveller, not a wanderer; and came down to the earth for our sakes.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 10:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.