Skip to content

Leviticus 21:20

“Physical Requirements for Priestly Service”Leviticus 21:16–24

King James Version
Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken;

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Or crookbackt H1384, or a dwarf H1851, or that hath a blemish H8400 in his eye H5869, or be scurvy H1618, or scabbed H3217, or hath his stones H810 broken H4790;

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
or who is a hunchback or dwarf, or who has an eye defect, a festering rash, scabs, or a crushed testicle.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
or crook-backed, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or is scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken;

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
or hunchbacked, or a dwarf, or one who has a defect in his eye, or an itching disease, or scabs, or who has damaged testicles.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Or is crooke backt, or bleare eyed, or hath a blemish in his eye, or be skiruie, or skabbed, or haue his stones broken.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
or hump-backed, or a dwarf, or with a mixture in his eye, or a scurvy person, or scabbed, or broken-testicled.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
14 Hebrew words
  1. אוֹ'ovorH176ConjConjunction
  2. גִבֵּןgi·Bena [man] hunchbackedH1384Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absolute
  3. אוֹ'ovorH176ConjConjunction
  4. דַקDaka [man] thinH1851Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absolute
  5. אוֹ'oorH176ConjConjunction
  6. תְּבַלֻּלte·va·Lula defectH8400N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  7. בְּעֵינוֹbe·'ei·Noin his eyeH5869Prep-b ¦ N-fsc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Feminine Construct with suffixבְּinעֵינeyeוֹhis
  8. אוֹ'oorH176ConjConjunction
  9. גָרָבga·RaveczemaH1618N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  10. אוֹ'oorH176ConjConjunction
  11. יַלֶּפֶתya·Le·fetscabsH3217N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
  12. אוֹ'oorH176ConjConjunction
  13. מְרוֹחַme·Ro·acha [man] crushed ofH4790Adj-mscAdjective Singular Masculine Construct
  14. אָשֶׁךְ'A·shekhtesticleH810N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
In the KJVVerse 3,366 of 31,102 · 10.8%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Six more conditions close the list, which are a hunched back, dwarfism, a film over the eye, two lasting skin diseases and crushed testicles.

“Or crookbackt, or a dwarf,”

Gibbên is a hunched or curved back. The dwarf is a man of unusually small stature.

“or that hath a blemish in his eye,”

The word tᵉballul names a cataract or film, a different word from the general term for blemish in verses 17, 18 and 21.

“or be scurvy, or scabbed,”

Two skin conditions, one chronic and one a festering or spreading sore.

“or hath his stones broken;”

Mᵉrôwach means bruised or crushed, here of the testicles, which closes the list.

Passage studyLeviticus 21:16–24

Priests with a Blemish Kept from the Altar

16And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17Speak unto Aaron, saying, Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. 18For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, 19Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, 20Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken; 21No man that hath a blemish of the seed of Aaron the priest shall come nigh to offer the offerings of the LORD made by fire: he hath a blemish; he shall not come nigh to offer the bread of his God. 22He shall eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy, and of the holy. 23Only he shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries: for I the LORD do sanctify them. 24And Moses told it unto Aaron, and to his sons, and unto all the children of Israel.

Summary

The LORD tells Moses to give Aaron a law for his descendants: a priest with a bodily blemish may eat the holy food of the priests, yet he must stay back from the altar and the veil. Twelve conditions are named, from blindness to a broken hand. The law guards the holiness of the place that God himself has set apart, and it teaches that whatever comes before him must be whole. It also shows his care, since the man keeps his place in the priestly family and his share of God’s bread. All of it points us to Jesus Christ, the high priest who is without blemish in every way.

Who is speaking, and to whom?

The LORD speaks to Moses, and Moses is to carry his words to Aaron. “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying” is the sentence that opens one new instruction after another in Leviticus, and each time it tells us that the law which follows comes from God. The name is Yᵉhôvâh, the personal name of the self-existent, eternal God who bound himself to Israel by covenant. The verb dâbar is the common Hebrew word for speaking and telling. God speaks first, and Moses listens. Moses’ own name, Môsheh, comes from a word for drawing out, given to him because he was drawn out of the water (Exodus 2:10).

Moses stands in this place because Israel asked for it and God appointed it. At Sinai the people were afraid of God’s voice and begged Moses to speak with God for them (Exodus 20:18–19). Other prophets received visions and dreams, while with Moses the LORD spoke “mouth to mouth” (Numbers 12:8), and God later promised to raise up a prophet like him (Deuteronomy 18:18). So the rules that follow are God’s own commands, and Israel was to hear them and keep them as they were given (Deuteronomy 4:1–2). The same is true of all Scripture, which is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16).

The message is addressed to Aaron, the head of the priestly family, and it covers “thy seed in their generations”, every son of his line for as long as that priesthood lasts.

Where this law stands in Leviticus

Israel is camped at Sinai, newly brought out of Egypt. The tabernacle has been set up as God’s dwelling among his people (Exodus 40), and Aaron’s family has been appointed to serve in it. The priests stood between God and Israel. They brought the people’s offerings to God, and they taught his law to the people and blessed them in his name. The deaths of Nadab and Abihu had already shown how serious it was to come near a holy God wrongly (Leviticus 10:1–2).

Leviticus 17–20 gives laws of holiness for the whole nation, summed up in the command “Ye shall be holy: for I the LORD your God am holy” (Leviticus 19:2), a call the book had already given once before (Leviticus 11:44). Leviticus 21–22 then turns to the priests, who are held to a higher standard because they serve nearest to him. The high priest wore the words “HOLINESS TO THE LORD” engraved on a plate of gold (Exodus 28:36).

Chapter 21 begins with rules about mourning and marriage for every priest (Leviticus 21:1–9) and stricter ones for the high priest (Leviticus 21:10–15). Our passage then turns from the priest’s conduct to his body, and Leviticus 22 goes on to the handling of holy things and the animals that may be offered.

What a blemish is, and what it bars

The rule is given in verse 17 and repeated in verses 18 and 21: a priest who has a blemish is to stay back from offering. The word for blemish, mʼûwm, means a defect or spot. It is the word Leviticus uses for the flaws that make an animal unfit for sacrifice (Leviticus 22:20–25), and the list in verses 18 to 20 shows that conditions of the body are meant here.

Two verbs describe what he is kept from. In verses 17 and 18 it is qârab, to approach or to bring near, and in verse 21 it is nâgash, to come or draw near. In this setting both mean coming to the altar to do a priest’s work there. Verse 21 names that work as offering “the offerings of the LORD made by fire”, such as the burnt offerings and peace offerings, and then widens it to “the bread of his God”, which takes in every offering laid on the altar. The verse states the blemish, states it again, and gives the ruling a second time, so that the matter is left beyond doubt.

The word for the man in verses 18 and 19, ʼîysh, is the ordinary word for an individual man, so the rule falls on each priest one by one.

What is “the bread of his God”?

The bread of his God is the offerings brought to the altar. The word lechem means bread, and also food of any kind, since bread was the staple of life in Israel. The phrase lechem elohav, “the bread of his God”, gathers up the grain offerings, peace offerings, sin offerings and the rest. They are called God’s bread because they are his portion, given in his honour and burned on his altar, and the picture is of a meal shared between God and his people. The word for God here is ʼĕlôhîym, which is plural in form, a plural of majesty when it names the true God.

The twelve conditions in verses 18 to 20

Verse 18 begins with the blind and the lame, two conditions that would also make it hard to move about the sanctuary and to handle the sacrifices with care. Next comes “he that hath a flat nose”, where the Hebrew châram describes a nose that is blunted, disfigured or mutilated, perhaps by injury or disease. “Any thing superfluous” is a part of the body beyond the usual, such as an extra finger or toe or an overlong limb.

Verse 19 adds the man who is “brokenfooted, or brokenhanded”. The word sheber means a break or an injury, here to the foot (regel) or the hand (yâd). A priest stood and walked through his whole service, and his hands did nearly all of it: they handled the holy vessels, laid the offerings on the altar and were lifted to bless the people.

Verse 20 has six more. “Crookbackt” (gibbên, from a root meaning to be arched) is a hunched or badly curved spine. “A dwarf” is a man of unusually small stature. “A blemish in his eye” (tᵉballul, from a root meaning to flow) is a cataract or film over the eye. “Scurvy” and “scabbed” are lasting skin diseases, the first something like chronic eczema or ringworm and the second a festering or spreading sore. The KJV’s “scurvy” is an old word for such a condition and has no link with the vitamin deficiency that now bears the name. Last is the man who “hath his stones broken” (mᵉrôwach, bruised or crushed), an injury to the testicles that left him emasculated. In a priesthood handed down from father to son, that injury touched the very means by which the line continued.

The list takes in conditions a man is born with and conditions that come by accident or illness. Some would hinder the work itself, and others would simply be seen.

Why did God require a whole body at his altar?

God required it as a sign of his own perfection. The tabernacle was the dwelling place of a perfectly holy God, an earthly picture of his heavenly dwelling, and everything in its service was to show that holiness. The animals laid on the altar had to be “without blemish” (Leviticus 1:3), and the same rule was carried over to the men who presented them. The offering and the one who offered it both had to be whole, because God deserves the best and what represents him must be complete. When Israel later brought blind and lame animals to the altar, Malachi rebuked them for it (Malachi 1:8).

So the rule was a lesson that all Israel could see. A priest’s sound body pictured the wholeness and blamelessness needed in anyone who stands between a holy God and his people. The nations around Israel also prized bodily soundness in their priests and sacrifices, and often took it as a sign of a god’s favour. Israel’s law rests on the holiness of the LORD, and it attaches no blame to the man himself. These conditions came by birth or by accident, outside a man’s control, and the law treats them as a matter of fitness for one ceremony. Scripture is plain that “the LORD looketh on the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7).

Does this law mean God thinks less of people with disabilities?

The law limits one task for the men of one family, and it leaves their worth, their place among God’s people and their share of the holy food untouched. A priest with a blemish remained a priest. He ate the most holy food, which was reserved for the men of the priestly family alone. The same law protects the disabled: it forbids anyone to curse the deaf or to put a stumblingblock before the blind (Leviticus 19:14), and it lays a curse on whoever leads the blind astray (Deuteronomy 27:18). When Jesus came, the blind received their sight and the lame walked (Matthew 11:5). The restriction concerned what a priest’s body pictured at the altar, and God’s love for the man was never in question.

The blemished priest still eats the bread of his God

Verse 22 is the kindness in this law: “He shall eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy, and of the holy.” The verb ʼâkal is the plain word for eating. The priest who is kept from offering the bread of his God is given that bread to eat.

This mattered for his living. The priests had no share of land among the tribes, and they lived on what Israel brought to the LORD (Numbers 18:20–24). A priest cut off from the holy food would have lost his livelihood, and God saw to it that a blemish cost a man his task at the altar and left his table full.

The word for holy, qôdesh, means a thing set apart for God, or holiness itself, and the verse names two grades of it. The “most holy” things (qodesh qodashim) were the priests’ parts of the sin offering, the trespass offering and the meal offering, eaten only by the males of the priestly family and only within the sanctuary court (Leviticus 6:29). The “holy” things, such as the priests’ portions of the peace offerings and the heave and wave offerings, could be eaten in any clean place by a priest’s household, his daughters included (Leviticus 10:14). The blemished priest receives both, which is the full provision of a priest.

His standing rests on God’s calling of Aaron’s family, and his duties at the altar are a separate matter. The same care for his servants appears throughout Scripture. Jesus tells us to take no thought for food and clothing because our Father knows that we need them (Matthew 6:25–33), Paul writes that God shall supply all our need (Philippians 4:19), and the Lord told Paul in his weakness, “My grace is sufficient for thee” (2 Corinthians 12:9).

Kept from the veil and the altar, because the LORD sanctifies them

Verse 23 states the limit once more and gives its reason. “The vail” (pôreketh) is the curtain that hung between the Holy Place and the Most Holy Place, where the ark of the covenant stood (Exodus 26:31–33). Only the high priest passed beyond it, once a year on the Day of Atonement. “The altar” (mizbêach) is the altar of burnt offering in the court, where the sacrifices for atonement were made. Between them the two mark out the places of priestly service, the inner one and the outer one.

The purpose is “that he profane not my sanctuaries”. To profane, châlal, is to treat a holy thing as common. The concern of the verse is the holiness of God’s house, and the priest’s character is left out of it. The ground of the whole law is its closing sentence: “for I the LORD do sanctify them.” To sanctify, qâdash, is to set apart as holy. The tabernacle and its altar are holy because God made them so, as he had promised to do (Exodus 29:44). Since their holiness is his own work, he decides how they are to be approached, just as he set apart the Sabbath day (Exodus 20:8–11) and marked out the clean from the unclean (Leviticus 11).

Why was this law told to all Israel?

Moses delivered it to Aaron, to Aaron’s sons and to the whole nation, because the holiness of the priests concerned everyone. The word for “told” is dâbar, the verb used of the LORD in verse 16, so what God spoke to Moses, Moses spoke on. “His sons” (bên, son) are the priests then living, and through them the generations to come.

A rule for priests might have been kept among priests. God had it told to all the children of Israel, so that the people would know what he required of those who served on their behalf, would respect the office, and would be able to hold their priests to it. Israel as a whole was called to be “a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation” (Exodus 19:6), and the holiness of the men at the altar was bound up with the nation’s own walk with God.

Christ, the priest without blemish

Every priest who met this standard was still a sinner. He had to offer sacrifice for his own sins before he offered for the people, and he did it day after day (Hebrews 7:27), until he died and another took his place. A sound body could only picture the wholeness that a true mediator needs. That wholeness is found in Jesus Christ, the high priest who is “holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens” (Hebrews 7:26).

He is both the priest and the offering. John the Baptist called him the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and Peter says that we were redeemed with his precious blood, “as of a lamb without blemish and without spot” (1 Peter 1:19). He offered himself without spot to God (Hebrews 9:14), once for all (Hebrews 9:28), and by his own blood he obtained eternal redemption (Hebrews 9:12). He is the bread as well. Where the old priests offered and ate the bread of their God, Jesus says, “I am the bread of life” (John 6:35).

Moses, who carried God’s word to Aaron, pointed ahead to him too. Jesus is the mediator of a better covenant (Hebrews 8:6), the one mediator between God and men (1 Timothy 2:5). The law was given by Moses, and grace and truth came by Jesus Christ (John 1:17), the Word made flesh (John 1:14), who is the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6).

The veil that the blemished priest was kept from has been opened. While the first tabernacle stood, the Holy Ghost was showing that the way into the holiest was still closed (Hebrews 9:8). When Jesus died, the veil of the temple was torn (Matthew 27:51), and he has entered heaven itself to appear before God for us (Hebrews 9:24). We now have boldness to enter the holiest by his blood, by a new and living way (Hebrews 10:19–22). Our great high priest was tempted as we are, “yet without sin”, and so we come boldly to the throne of grace (Hebrews 4:14–16).

A holy God who keeps his servants at his table

This passage shows the holiness of God and his kindness side by side. He guards his altar, and he feeds the man he keeps back from it. In Christ all who believe are “a royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9), “an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ” (1 Peter 2:5). Our offerings are praise, prayer, obedience and service, and our own selves, presented as “a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God” (Romans 12:1).

The blemishes that matter in this priesthood are those of the heart, such as sin kept hidden, mixed motives, hypocrisy and a divided loyalty. God still calls his people to be holy in all their conduct, because he is holy (1 Peter 1:15–16), and to follow holiness (Hebrews 12:14). Our welcome before him rests on Christ’s perfection, which is why a believer who knows his own faults may still draw near.

The priest with a blemish also speaks to anyone who feels limited or of little use. His worth to God lay in belonging to the family God had called, and his place at the table held when the work at the altar was closed to him. God looks past what a person can do to whose that person is, and he provides for his own.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Leviticus 21:16–24. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 9 verses
Passage under commentLeviticus 21:16–24
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The priesthood being confined to one particular family, and entailed upon all the male issue of that family throughout their generations, it was very likely that some or other in after-ages that were born to the priesthood would have natural blemishes and deformities: the honour of the priesthood would not secure them from any of those calamities which are common to men. Divers blemishes are here specified; some that were ordinarily for life, as blindness; others that might be for a time, as a scurf or scab, and, when they were gone, the disability ceased. Now,

I.The law concerning priests that had blemishes was,

1.That they might live upon the altar (Leviticus 21:22): He shall eat of the sacrifices with the other priests, even the most holy things, such as the show-bread and the sin-offerings, as well as the holy things, such as the tithes and first-fruits, and the priests' share of the peace-offerings. The blemishes were such as they could not help, and therefore, though they might not work, they must not starve. Note, None must be abused for their natural infirmities. Even the deformed child in the family must have its child's part.

2.Yet they must not serve at the altar, at either of the altars, nor be admitted to attend or assist the other priests in offering sacrifice or burning incense, Leviticus 21:17, Leviticus 21:21, Leviticus 21:23. Great men choose to have such servants about them as are sightly, and it was fit that the great God should have such in his house then, when he was pleased to manifest his glory in external indications of it. But it was especially requisite that comely men should be chosen to minister about holy things, for the sake of the people, who were apt to judge according to outward appearance, and to think meanly of the service, how honourable soever it was made by the divine institution, of those that performed it looked despicably or went about it awkwardly. This provision God made for the preserving of the reputation of his altar, that it might not at any time fall under contempt. It was for the credit of the sanctuary that none should appear there who were any way disfigured, either by nature or accident.

II.Under the gospel,

1.Those that labour under any such blemishes as these have reason to thank God that they are not thereby excluded from offering spiritual sacrifices to God; nor, if otherwise qualified for it, from the office of the ministry. There is many a healthful beautiful soul lodged in a crazy deformed body. Yet,

2.We ought to infer hence how incapable those are to serve God acceptably whose minds are blemished and deformed by any reigning vice. Those are unworthy to be called Christians, and unfit to be employed as minsters, that are spiritually blind, and lame, and crooked, whose sins render them scandalous and deformed, so as that the offerings of the Lord are abhorred for their sakes. The deformities of Hophni and Phinehas were worse than any of the blemishes here mentioned. Let such therefore as are openly vicious be put out of the priesthood as polluted persons; and let all that are made to our God spiritual priests be before him holy and without blemish, and comfort themselves with this, that, though in this imperfect state they have spots that are the spots of God's children, yet they shall shortly appear before the throne of God without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing.

Historical interpretation

Historical reception

1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 604
Hence also it is said through Moses that whoever is burdened with a hump should by no means be advanced to the priesthood. And all of us who have been redeemed by the blood of Christ are made members of that same high priest. Whence also it is said to us through Peter: "But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood." But he who bears a hump always gazes at the lowest things. Therefore he is driven from the priesthood, because whoever is intent only on earthly things is himself a witness to himself that he is not a member of the high priest.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Leviticus 21:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8