Leviticus 13:11

Translation
King James Version
It is an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh, and the priest shall pronounce him unclean, and shall not shut him up: for he is unclean.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
It is an old H3462 leprosy H6883 in the skin H5785 of his flesh H1320, and the priest H3548 shall pronounce him unclean H2930, and shall not shut H5462 him up: for he is unclean H2931.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
then it is chronic tzara'at on his skin, and the cohen is to declare him unclean; he is not to isolate him, because it is already clear that he is unclean.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
it is a chronic skin disease and the priest must pronounce him unclean. He need not isolate him, for he is unclean.
Ask
American Standard Version
it is an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh, and the priest shall pronounce him unclean: he shall not shut him up; for he is unclean.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
it is a chronic leprosy in the skin of his body, and the priest shall pronounce him unclean. He shall not isolate him, for he is already unclean.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
It is an old leprosie in the skin of his flesh: and the Priest shall pronounce him vncleane, and shall not shut him vp, for he is vncleane.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
an old leprosy it is in the skin of his flesh, and the priest hath pronounced him unclean; he doth not shut him up, for he is unclean.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 3,064 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Leviticus 13:11 details a specific protocol within the Mosaic laws concerning tzara'at, a category of severe skin afflictions. This verse addresses a case where the priest identifies a long-standing, unequivocally established instance of the disease, termed "an old leprosy." Unlike new or ambiguous presentations that might necessitate a period of isolation and re-examination, this chronic condition is immediately and definitively diagnosed as ritually unclean, prompting an immediate declaration of uncleanness without any probationary "shutting up" period. The verse underscores the priest's authoritative role as the divinely appointed arbiter of ritual purity and the decisive nature of certain defiling conditions under the Old Covenant.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Leviticus 13 and 14 constitute a comprehensive legal corpus within the Pentateuch, meticulously outlining the identification, diagnosis, and purification rituals associated with tzara'at when it affects human skin, garments, or houses. This section is an integral part of the broader purity laws (Torah Cohanim) found in Leviticus 11-15, which delineate what renders a person or object ritually clean or unclean, and the prescribed methods for managing or removing such uncleanness. Leviticus 13:1-8 details the initial inspection process by the priest for a suspected case of tzara'at. Specifically, verses 4-5 describe the requirement for the priest to "shut up" (isolate) an individual for seven days if the affliction's nature is uncertain or if it appears to be healing, followed by a re-examination. In stark contrast, verse 11 presents a distinct scenario, dealing with a condition that is clearly "old" and established. This immediate declaration of uncleanness without a waiting period highlights the severity and unmistakable nature of such a persistent affliction, distinguishing it from nascent or ambiguous presentations that require further observation.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, tzara'at (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was a comprehensive term encompassing various skin conditions, not exclusively Hansen's disease (modern leprosy). These ailments were not merely medical issues but carried profound ceremonial, social, and theological implications within the covenant community. An individual afflicted with tzara'at was considered ritually "unclean" (Hebrew: טָמֵא, tameh), which mandated their separation from the camp and prohibited their participation in corporate worship or social life, as explicitly detailed in Numbers 5:2-3. This separation was paramount for maintaining the holiness and purity of the Israelite camp, especially given the palpable presence of God's Tabernacle among them. The priest's role was divinely appointed and paramount; he functioned as the authoritative diagnostician and judge of ritual purity, not as a physician. His pronouncement of "clean" or "unclean" was a binding legal and theological declaration. The concept of "old leprosy" (tzara'at yoshevet) implies a chronic, persistent condition that had been present for a significant duration, rendering its diagnosis unequivocal and precluding the need for the probationary "shutting up" period typically required for new or ambiguous cases (Leviticus 13:4).
  • Key Themes: Leviticus 13:11 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it reinforces the theme of God's Holiness and Purity, emphasizing His absolute separation from anything defiling and His demand for a holy people. The meticulous tzara'at laws illustrate the practical outworking of this divine attribute in the daily lives of the Israelites. Secondly, the verse highlights the Authority of the Priesthood as divinely appointed mediators and arbiters of purity. The priest's pronouncements were not suggestions but binding declarations that determined an individual's status within the covenant community. Thirdly, it underscores the theme of Defilement and Separation, demonstrating that certain conditions, particularly chronic ones like "old leprosy," inherently rendered an individual unclean, necessitating their separation from the holy camp to prevent the spread of impurity and maintain the sanctity of God's dwelling place. This concept of separation for purity is foundational to understanding the covenant relationship (Leviticus 11:44-45). Finally, the distinction between new/ambiguous cases and "old leprosy" illustrates the theme of Discernment and Decisiveness in dealing with impurity, where clear and established defilement requires immediate and definitive action, without delay or re-evaluation, contrasting with the probationary periods for less certain afflictions (Leviticus 13:4-5).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Old (Hebrew, yâshên', H3462): The Hebrew word יָשֵׁן (yâshên, H3462) describes the tzara'at as "old," "stale," or "inveterate." This term signifies a chronic, persistent, and clearly identifiable condition that has been present for a significant duration, in contrast to a new or developing affliction. Its presence indicates that the disease has taken root and is not a transient or ambiguous skin irritation, thus requiring no further observation.
  • Unclean (Hebrew, ṭâmêʼ', H2930): The Hebrew word טָמֵא (ṭâmêʼ, H2930/H2931) refers to a state of ritual impurity. This is a legal and ceremonial designation, not necessarily a moral one. To be ṭâmêʼ meant one was temporarily unfit to participate in sacred acts, enter holy spaces, or interact fully within the community until proper purification rituals were performed. For tzara'at, this state of uncleanness was particularly severe and prolonged, often requiring isolation. The priest's declaration of ṭâmêʼ was binding and necessitated the prescribed actions for the unclean person.
  • Shut him up (Hebrew, çâgar', H5462): The Hebrew root סָגַר (çâgar, H5462) means "to shut up," "to close up," or "to confine." In this context, the phrase "shall not shut him up" (לֹא יַסְגִּרֶנּוּ, lo yisgerennu) is a crucial distinction from cases described earlier in Leviticus 13 (e.g., Leviticus 13:4). For an "old leprosy," the diagnosis is so clear and definitive that there is no need for a probationary period of seven days to observe the condition's progression. The immediate and certain nature of the uncleanness means the individual is declared unclean at once, without further delay or re-examination.

Verse Breakdown

  • "It [is] an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh": This opening clause definitively identifies the nature of the skin affliction. The term "old leprosy" (tzara'at yoshevet, using the participle of yashav in conjunction with yâshên for "old") indicates that the disease is not a new or ambiguous manifestation but a chronic, well-established condition. The phrase "in the skin of his flesh" specifies the visible location and physical manifestation of the disease, making its presence evident and undeniable to the priest upon inspection.
  • "and the priest shall pronounce him unclean": This highlights the priest's authoritative and declarative role within the Mosaic legal system. His pronouncement is not a medical diagnosis but a legal and ritual judgment based on God's revealed law. Once the "old leprosy" is identified, there is no ambiguity, and the priest's immediate duty is to declare the individual ritually ṭâmêʼ (unclean), initiating the prescribed consequences of defilement.
  • "and shall not shut him up:": This is the pivotal distinguishing instruction of the verse. Unlike other cases where the priest might "shut up" (isolate) the individual for a period of observation (typically seven days) to confirm the diagnosis (e.g., Leviticus 13:4), for an "old leprosy," no such probationary period is required. The established and chronic nature of the disease makes further observation unnecessary, as the diagnosis is already conclusive.
  • "for he [is] unclean.": This final clause provides the definitive rationale for the priest's immediate declaration and the absence of a probationary period. The definitive presence of "old leprosy" means the individual is already, unequivocally, in a state of ritual uncleanness. The condition itself serves as the irrefutable evidence, leaving no room for doubt or re-evaluation regarding their status before God and the community.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 13:11 employs several literary devices to convey its precise legal and theological message. Legal Language is paramount, characterized by its prescriptive and declarative nature, evident in phrases like "the priest shall pronounce him unclean" and "shall not shut him up." The text functions as a clear, unambiguous instruction within the Mosaic Law, leaving no room for subjective interpretation in this specific case. Contrast is also a significant device, as this verse stands in direct opposition to earlier verses (e.g., Leviticus 13:4-5) that mandate a "shutting up" period for less definitive or newly appearing cases of tzara'at. This contrast powerfully underscores the unmistakable and chronic nature of "old leprosy." Furthermore, Symbolism is inherent in the entire tzara'at legislation. The physical defilement of the skin condition serves as a potent symbol for spiritual impurity and the pervasive, defiling nature of sin, which separates an individual from the holy community and, ultimately, from a holy God. The immediate and definitive declaration of uncleanness for an "old leprosy" symbolically represents the clear, undeniable, and entrenched nature of chronic sin.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Leviticus 13:11 profoundly underscores God's absolute holiness and His unwavering demand for purity within His covenant community. The meticulous laws concerning tzara'at highlight that defilement, whether physical or spiritual, cannot coexist with God's manifest presence. The immediate and definitive declaration of uncleanness for "old leprosy" emphasizes that persistent, undeniable impurity requires decisive action and separation. This reflects a profound theological truth: sin, especially when it becomes chronic, deeply ingrained, and clearly evident, is recognized by God as a state of defilement that necessitates a radical separation from His holy presence until true cleansing and reconciliation occur. The priest's role as the diagnostician and declarer of purity, acting on God's behalf, prefigures humanity's inherent need for a perfect mediator to address our pervasive uncleanness before a perfectly holy God.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Leviticus 13:11, while rooted in ancient ceremonial laws, offers profound and timeless spiritual lessons for believers today. The concept of "old leprosy" as a clearly identifiable and persistent defilement serves as a powerful metaphor for entrenched, chronic patterns of sin in our lives. Just as the priest could immediately discern and declare the uncleanness of an established physical condition, so too must we, empowered by the Holy Spirit, learn to discern and honestly acknowledge the deep-seated spiritual "leprosy" that defiles us and separates us from God's perfect will. There are times when our spiritual condition is not a new, ambiguous spot, but a chronic, undeniable defilement that demands immediate and forthright recognition, rather than a period of denial, rationalization, or "observation." This verse calls us to confront our spiritual realities without delay, understanding that true cleansing and restoration begin with a humble and forthright admission of our defilement. It reminds us that God's standard of holiness is unwavering, and He desires a people who are truly set apart for Him, free from the pervasive and entrenched influence of sin.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "old leprosy" or persistent sin patterns in my life might I be tempted to "shut up" or ignore, rather than confronting them immediately and decisively?
  • How does the priest's definitive declaration of uncleanness for "old leprosy" challenge my own tendency to minimize, rationalize, or delay dealing with my sin?
  • In what ways does this passage highlight the importance of spiritual discernment in recognizing and addressing deep-seated issues of defilement in my personal life and within the community of faith?

FAQ

What was tzara'at (often translated as "leprosy") in ancient Israel?

Answer: Tzara'at (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was a broad category of severe skin afflictions described in the detailed purity laws of Leviticus 13-14. It was not exclusively modern Hansen's disease but encompassed various skin conditions, including rashes, boils, and fungal infections. Crucially, tzara'at was not primarily a medical diagnosis but a ritual and theological one. Its presence rendered an individual ritually "unclean" (ṭâmêʼ), requiring separation from the community and the Tabernacle, and necessitating priestly declaration for diagnosis and eventual cleansing. It was a visible sign of defilement that profoundly impacted one's standing in the holy community.

Why did the priest "not shut him up" in the case of "old leprosy"?

Answer: The phrase "shall not shut him up" refers to a probationary period of isolation, typically seven days, during which the priest would observe a suspected skin condition to see if it spread, healed, or remained ambiguous (as described in Leviticus 13:4-5). In the case of "old leprosy" (tzara'at yoshevet), the condition was clearly established, chronic, and unmistakable. There was no ambiguity or doubt about its nature or progression. Therefore, no period of observation was needed; the priest could immediately and definitively pronounce the individual unclean, as the evidence of defilement was already conclusive and required no further assessment.

Is the concept of "unclean" from tzara'at relevant for Christians today?

Answer: While the literal ceremonial laws concerning tzara'at are not binding for Christians under the New Covenant, the underlying theological principles remain profoundly relevant. The physical uncleanness of tzara'at served as a powerful symbol for spiritual defilement, particularly sin. Just as tzara'at separated an individual from the holy community and God's presence, so too does sin separate us from God. The need for a definitive declaration of uncleanness and subsequent cleansing points to humanity's universal need for spiritual purification from sin. For believers, this cleansing comes not through ritual sacrifices or priestly pronouncements, but through the perfect and atoning work of Jesus Christ, who purifies us from all unrighteousness (1 John 1:7).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Leviticus 13:11, with its stark declaration of uncleanness for "old leprosy," finds its profound and glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who stands as the ultimate High Priest and the Great Physician. The "old leprosy" powerfully symbolizes the chronic, pervasive, and deeply ingrained nature of human sin, which undeniably separates us from a holy God. The Mosaic Law, through the earthly priest, could only diagnose and declare this uncleanness, leading to isolation and separation from the community and God's presence (Leviticus 13:45-46). However, Jesus does not merely diagnose; He heals, purifies, and restores. He demonstrates His divine authority over all forms of defilement by reaching out and touching lepers—an act forbidden under the Law—and instantly making them clean (e.g., Matthew 8:2-3). As our compassionate and perfect High Priest, Jesus does not "shut us up" in our sin; instead, through His perfect, once-for-all sacrifice on the cross, He takes away the sin of the world, offering definitive cleansing and reconciliation (John 1:29 and Hebrews 9:26). He is the one who authoritatively declares us righteous and clean, not based on our own efforts or the persistence of our "leprosy," but solely on the efficacy of His atoning blood, thereby bringing us into full and eternal communion with God and His people (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Copy as

Commentary on Leviticus 13 verses 1–17

I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employed not the physicians but the priests about it. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure them. We do not read of any that died of the leprosy, but it rather buried them alive, by rendering them unfit for conversation with any but such as were infected like themselves. Yet there is a tradition that Pharaoh, who sought to kill Moses, was the first that ever was struck with this disease, and that he died of it. It is said to have begun first in Egypt, whence it spread into Syria. It was very well known to Moses, when he put his own hand into his bosom and took it out leprous. 2. That it was a plague inflicted immediately by the hand of God, and came not from natural causes, as other diseases; and therefore must be managed according to a divine law. Miriam's leprosy, and Gehazi's, and king Uzziah's, were all the punishments of particular sins: and, if generally it was so, no marvel there was so much care taken to distinguish it from a common distemper, that none might be looked upon as lying under this extraordinary token of divine displeasure but those that really were so. 3. That it is a plague not now known in the world; what is commonly called the leprosy is of a quite different nature. This seems to have been reserved as a particular scourge for the sinners of those times and places. The Jews retained the idolatrous customs they had learnt in Egypt, and therefore God justly caused this with some others of the diseases of Egypt to follow them. Yet we read of Naaman the Syrian, who was a leper, Kg2 5:1. 4. That there were other breakings-out in the body which did very much resemble the leprosy, but were not it, which might make a man sore and loathsome and yet not ceremonially unclean. Justly are our bodies called vile bodies, which have in them the seeds of so many diseases, by which the lives of so many are made bitter to them. 5. That the judgment of it was referred to the priests. Lepers were looked upon as stigmatized by the justice of God, and therefore it was left to his servants the priests, who might be presumed to know his mark best, to pronounce who were lepers and who were not. All the Jews say, "Any priest, though disabled by a blemish to attend the sanctuary, might be a judge of the leprosy, provided the blemish were not in his eye. And he might" (they say) "take a common person to assist him in the search, but the priest only must pronounce the judgment." 6. That it was a figure of the moral pollution of men's minds by sin, which is the leprosy of the soul, defiling to the conscience, and from which Christ alone can cleanse us; for herein the power of his grace infinitely transcends that of the legal priesthood, that the priest could only convict the leper (for by the law is the knowledge of sin), but Christ can cure the leper, he can take away sin. Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean, which was more than the priests could do, Mat 8:2. Some think that the leprosy signified, not so much sin in general as a state of sin, by which men are separated from God (their spot not being the spot of God's children), and scandalous sin, for which men are to be shut out from the communion of the faithful. It is a work of great importance, but of great difficulty, to judge of our spiritual state: we have all cause to suspect ourselves, being conscious to ourselves of sores and spots, but whether clean or unclean is the question. A man might have a scab (Lev 13:6) and yet be clean: the best have their infirmities; but, as there were certain marks by which to know that it was a leprosy, so there are characters of such as are in the gall of bitterness, and the work of ministers is to declare the judgment of leprosy and to assist those that suspect themselves in the trial of their spiritual state, remitting or retaining sin. And hence the keys of the kingdom of heaven are said to be given to them, because they are to separate between the precious and the vile, and to judge who are fit as clean to partake of the holy things and who as unclean must be debarred from them.

II. Several rules are here laid down by which the judgment of the priest must be governed. 1. If the sore was but skin-deep, it was to be hoped it was not the leprosy, Lev 13:4. But, if it was deeper than the skin, the man must be pronounced unclean, Lev 13:3. The infirmities that consist with grace do not sink deep into the soul, but the mind still serves the law of God, and the inward man delights in it, Rom 7:22, Rom 7:25. But if the matter be really worse than it shows, and the inwards be infected, the case is dangerous. 2. If the sore be at a stay, and do not spread, it is no leprosy, Lev 13:4, Lev 13:5. But if it spread much abroad, and continue to do so after several inspections, the case is bad, Lev 13:7, Lev 13:8. If men do not grow worse, but a stop be put to the course of their sins and their corruptions be checked, it is to be hoped they will grow better; but if sin get ground, and they become worse every day, they are going downhill. 3. If there was proud raw flesh in the rising, the priest needed not to wait any longer, it was certainly a leprosy, Lev 13:10, Lev 13:11. Nor is there any surer indication of the badness of a man's spiritual state than the heart's rising in self-conceit, confidence in the flesh, and resistance of the reproofs of the word and strivings of the Spirit. 4. If the eruption, whatever it was, covered all the skin from head to foot, it was no leprosy (Lev 13:12, Lev 13:13); for it was an evidence that the vitals were sound and strong, and nature hereby helped itself, throwing out what was burdensome and pernicious. There is hope in the small-pox when they come out well: so if men freely confess their sins, and hide them not, there is no danger comparable to theirs that cover their sins. Some gather this from it, that there is more hope of the profane than of hypocrites. The publicans and harlots went into the kingdom of heaven before scribes and Pharisees. In one respect, the sudden breakings-out of passion, though bad enough, are not so dangerous as malice concealed. Others gather this, that, if we judge ourselves, we shall not be judged; if we see and own that there is no health in us, no soundness in our flesh, by reason of sin, we shall find grace in the eyes of the Lord. 5. The priest must take time in making his judgment, and not give it rashly. If the matter looked suspicious, he must shut up the patient seven days, and then seven days more, that his judgment might be according to truth. This teaches all, both ministers and people, not to be hasty in their censures, nor to judge any thing before the time. If some men's sins go before unto judgment, the sins of others follow after, and so men's good works; therefore let nothing be done suddenly, Ti1 5:22, Ti1 5:24, Ti1 5:25. 6. If the person suspected was found to be clean, yet he must wash his clothes (Lev 13:6), because he had been under the suspicion, and there had been in him that which gave ground for the suspicion. Even the prisoner that is acquitted must go down on his knees. We have need to be washed in the blood of Christ from our spots, though they be not leprosy-spots; for who can say, I am pure from sin? though there are those who through grace are innocent from the great transgression.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 13:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.