Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he took the people, and divided them into three companies, and laid wait in the field, and looked, and, behold, the people were come forth out of the city; and he rose up against them, and smote them.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he took H3947 the people H5971, and divided H2673 them into three H7969 companies H7218, and laid wait H693 in the field H7704, and looked H7200, and, behold, the people H5971 were come forth H3318 out of the city H5892; and he rose up H6965 against them, and smote H5221 them.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He took his men, divided them into three groups, and lay in wait in the field. When he saw the people going out of the city, he came out of hiding and slaughtered them.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So he took his men, divided them into three companies, and lay in wait in the fields. When he saw the people coming out of the city, he rose up against them and attacked them.
Ask
American Standard Version
And he took the people, and divided them into three companies, and laid wait in the field; and he looked, and, behold, the people came forth out of the city; and he rose up against them, and smote them.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He took the people, and divided them into three companies, and laid wait in the field; and he looked, and behold, the people came out of the city; He rose up against them, and struck them.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he tooke the people, and deuided them into three bandes, and layde wayte in the fieldes, and looked, and beholde, the people were come out of the citie, and he rose vp against them, and smote them.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and he taketh the people, and divideth them into three detachments, and layeth wait in a field, and looketh, and lo, the people are coming out from the city, and he riseth against them, and smiteth them.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,798 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 9:43 details a critical phase in Abimelech's military campaign against Thebez, showcasing his calculated strategy to ambush the city's inhabitants. He meticulously divided his forces into three tactical companies and positioned them covertly in the open field, patiently awaiting the moment the people of Thebez would emerge from their city gates. Upon their appearance, Abimelech launched a swift and decisive attack, "smoting" them, securing a significant victory in his relentless and brutal pursuit of power. This verse vividly illustrates Abimelech's ruthless ambition and tactical acumen, set against the backdrop of a chaotic period in Israel marked by moral decay and the absence of righteous leadership.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 9:43 is situated within the tumultuous narrative of Abimelech, the illegitimate son of Gideon, who violently seized power in Shechem. The preceding verses (Judges 9:42) describe Abimelech's initial, brutal assault on Shechem, where he destroyed the city and symbolically sowed it with salt to signify its utter desolation. Following this act of vengeance, the narrative shifts to Abimelech's continued campaign against other rebellious factions, specifically those in Thebez. Verse 43 describes a precise tactical maneuver in this ongoing conflict, immediately preceding the climax of Abimelech's reign in Judges 9:50-54, where he meets his ignominious end. The broader literary context of Judges 9 serves as a stark cautionary tale about the dangers of illegitimate kingship and the chaos that ensues when a people reject divine guidance, contrasting sharply with Gideon's earlier refusal of kingship in Judges 8:23.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of the Judges (roughly 12th-11th centuries BCE) was characterized by a decentralized tribal confederacy in Israel, lacking a central monarchical authority. This era was marked by recurrent cycles of apostasy, oppression, repentance, and deliverance, often summarized by the phrase "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). Abimelech's attempt to establish himself as king in Shechem was a premature and illegitimate move, reflecting a growing desire for stable leadership but executed through brutal and self-serving means. The military tactics described, such as dividing forces into companies and laying ambushes, were common in ancient warfare, designed to maximize surprise and overwhelm an enemy. Cities like Thebez were typically fortified, and engagements often occurred outside the city walls, either during a siege or when inhabitants ventured out for resources or a counter-attack. The use of an ambush highlights the strategic thinking prevalent in the military engagements of the time, emphasizing cunning over direct confrontation.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within Judges 9 and the broader book of Judges. Firstly, it underscores the Cycle of Violence and Retribution that permeates the book. Abimelech's initial violence against his seventy brothers (Judges 9:5) sets off a chain reaction of bloodshed and betrayal, culminating in his own violent demise. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Illegitimate Leadership and its Consequences. Abimelech's self-appointed kingship, based on murder and ambition rather than divine anointing or communal consent, leads only to destruction and chaos, serving as a stark contrast to the divinely appointed leaders (judges) and foreshadowing the complexities of later Israelite monarchy. Finally, the verse subtly points to Divine Justice, as Abimelech's actions, though seemingly successful in the short term, ultimately lead to his downfall, fulfilling Jotham's prophetic curse against him and the men of Shechem (Judges 9:20).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Divided (Hebrew, châtsâh', H2673): From the primitive root H2673 (חָצָה), meaning "to cut or split in two; to halve." In this military context, it signifies Abimelech's deliberate act of organizing his forces into separate, manageable units. This strategic division allowed for greater tactical flexibility, enabling a multi-pronged attack or a coordinated surprise from different directions, a common and effective maneuver in ancient warfare.
  • Laid wait (Hebrew, ʼârab', H693): From the primitive root H693 (אָרַב), meaning "to lurk; (lie in) ambush(-ment), lay (lie in) wait." This word emphasizes the premeditated, deceptive, and strategic nature of Abimelech's attack. It was not an open battle but a calculated surprise assault, designed to catch the people of Thebez off guard as they emerged from the relative safety of their city, highlighting Abimelech's cunning and ruthlessness.
  • Smote (Hebrew, nâkâh', H5221): From the primitive root H5221 (נָכָה), meaning "to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively); beat, kill, make (slaughter), slay, smite." In a military context, this verb implies a violent, decisive, and destructive blow, leading to injury, death, or rout. Here, it signifies the effectiveness and brutality of Abimelech's ambush, resulting in a significant defeat and likely casualties among the people of Thebez who ventured outside their city walls.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he took the people, and divided them into three companies": This clause reveals Abimelech's strategic planning and command. He gathered his fighting force, likely composed of mercenaries and loyalists, and organized them into three distinct tactical units. This division was a standard military strategy, allowing for enhanced maneuverability, the ability to cover different approaches, or to launch a coordinated attack from multiple directions, maximizing the element of surprise.
  • "and laid wait in the field": This describes the positioning of Abimelech's forces. They concealed themselves in the open terrain surrounding Thebez, patiently awaiting their opportune moment. The "field" (H7704, sâdeh) suggests an area outside the immediate city walls, where city dwellers might emerge for various reasons, such as foraging, defense, or even daily activities, making them vulnerable targets.
  • "and looked, and, behold, the people [were] come forth out of the city": This indicates the precise moment of opportunity for Abimelech. He, or his scouts, observed the inhabitants of Thebez leaving their fortifications. This "coming forth" (H3318, yâtsâʼ) likely refers to a significant portion of the city's population, perhaps a defensive sortie or a group unaware of the imminent danger. The interjection "behold" adds a sense of immediacy and the dramatic reveal of the ambush's unsuspecting targets.
  • "and he rose up against them, and smote them": This describes the swift execution and devastating result of the ambush. Upon seeing their target, Abimelech's hidden forces launched their attack. To "rose up" (H6965, qûwm) denotes a sudden, aggressive charge from their concealed positions. "Smote them" (H5221, nâkâh) signifies a decisive and violent engagement, resulting in the defeat and likely significant casualties among the people of Thebez.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices to convey its meaning and impact. Military Rhetoric is evident in the precise description of tactical maneuvers—dividing forces, laying an ambush, and striking the enemy—which paints a vivid picture of ancient warfare. There is a subtle Irony in Abimelech's use of the "three companies" tactic, which was famously and successfully employed by his father, Gideon, for a divinely sanctioned victory over the Midianites (Judges 7:16). Abimelech, however, employs this same tactic for his own selfish, violent, and illegitimate ends, highlighting the perversion of a previously righteous strategy. The swiftness of the action, from "laid wait" to "rose up" and "smote," creates a sense of Pace and Urgency, emphasizing the sudden and overwhelming nature of the attack. The narrative also uses Foreshadowing in a broader sense; while Abimelech achieves a temporary victory here, the meticulous detail of his military actions at Thebez ironically sets the stage for his own inglorious defeat and death at the very same city later in the chapter (Judges 9:53).

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 9:43, though describing a military engagement, serves as a grim illustration of the spiritual and moral decay during the period of the Judges. Abimelech's ruthless ambition and reliance on cunning and violence rather than justice or divine guidance underscore the dangers of human leadership divorced from God's will. This verse, in conjunction with the entire Abimelech narrative, highlights the principle that those who live by the sword often perish by the sword, reflecting a divine principle of justice and retribution. It also speaks to the consequences of a society that rejects God's covenant and seeks to establish its own order, leading to internal strife and bloodshed. The repeated cycles of sin and suffering in Judges demonstrate humanity's persistent need for a righteous and true King, one who rules with justice and mercy.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The account of Abimelech's military strategy at Thebez, while a historical record of ancient conflict, offers profound lessons for contemporary reflection. It reminds us that cunning and power, when unconstrained by moral principles or divine wisdom, lead to destructive outcomes. Abimelech's story is a cautionary tale about unchecked ambition and the insidious nature of violence, demonstrating how the pursuit of self-interest can sow discord and reap devastation. For believers, this narrative calls for a sober assessment of our own motives and methods. Are we seeking to advance our own agendas through manipulative or aggressive means, or are we committed to righteous and peaceful paths? The world often operates on principles of power and surprise, much like Abimelech's ambush, but followers of Christ are called to a different standard—one of integrity, love, and justice. We are to be discerning, understanding the tactics of spiritual opposition, yet always acting with the purity of heart that reflects our allegiance to the Prince of Peace.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Abimelech's military strategy reflect his character and the broader moral climate of the Judges period?
  • In what ways might we, in our own lives, be tempted to employ "ambush" tactics (e.g., manipulation, deceit) to achieve our goals, rather than walking in integrity?
  • What does this narrative teach us about the long-term consequences of seeking power through unrighteous means?
  • How can we apply the principle of vigilance and preparedness in our spiritual lives without resorting to worldly tactics?

FAQ

What was the significance of dividing forces into "three companies" in ancient warfare?

Answer: Dividing forces into "three companies" was a common and highly effective military tactic in the ancient Near East, designed to maximize strategic advantage. It allowed for multi-directional assaults, the encirclement of an enemy, or the creation of a coordinated surprise attack from different flanks. This method could confuse and overwhelm an opponent, making it difficult for them to defend effectively. Gideon, Abimelech's father, famously used this tactic to great success against the Midianites in Judges 7:16-22. In Abimelech's case, it demonstrates his tactical acumen, even if his motives were corrupt and self-serving.

How does this verse contribute to the overall message of the book of Judges?

Answer: Judges 9:43, within the broader narrative of Abimelech, serves as a powerful illustration of the central theme of the book of Judges: the chaos and suffering that result when "there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). Abimelech's illegitimate and violent reign, culminating in his tactical victories and eventual demise, underscores the futility and destructiveness of human leadership that is not divinely appointed or guided. It highlights the desperate need for a righteous king to bring order, justice, and peace to Israel, ultimately pointing to the future Davidic monarchy and, by extension, the true King, Jesus Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The grim account of Abimelech's ruthless ambition and tactical violence in Judges 9:43, though seemingly far removed from the New Testament, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in several ways. Abimelech represents the epitome of a fallen, self-appointed king who seeks to establish his dominion through bloodshed and cunning, ultimately leading to destruction. He is a stark contrast to the true King, Jesus Christ. While Abimelech "laid wait" to "smote them," Jesus, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, did not come to ambush and destroy, but to be ambushed and sacrificed for the salvation of humanity. He is the King who conquers not by force of arms, but by self-giving love, laying down His life on the cross (Philippians 2:8). Unlike Abimelech, whose reign was marked by chaos and ultimately ended in ignominy, Christ's kingdom is one of righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit (Romans 14:17). He is the true and legitimate King, not chosen by human ambition but appointed by God (John 18:36-37), whose victory over sin and death was achieved through suffering, not by striking down His enemies, but by bearing their sin. The narrative of Abimelech's failed, violent kingship ultimately magnifies the glory and redemptive power of Christ's perfect, eternal reign.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 9 verses 22–49

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Three years Abimelech reigned, after a sort, without any disturbance; it is not said, He judged Israel, or did any service at all to his country, but so long he enjoyed the title and dignity of a king; and not only the Shechemites, but many other places, paid him respect. They must have been fond of a king that could please themselves with such a one as this. But the triumphing of the wicked is short. Within three years, as the years of a hireling, all this glory shall be contemned, and laid in the dust, Isa 16:14. The ruin of these confederates in wickedness was from the righteous hand of the God to whom vengeance belongs. He sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the Shechemites (Jdg 9:23), that is, they grew jealous one of another and ill-affected one to another. He slighted those that set him up, and perhaps countenanced other cities which now began to come into his interests more than he did theirs; and then they grew uneasy at his government, blamed his conduct, and quarrelled at his impositions. This was from God. He permitted the devil, that great mischief-maker, to sow discord between them, and he is an evil spirit, whom God not only keeps under his check, but sometimes serves his own purposes by. Their own lusts were evil spirits; they are devils in men's own hearts; from them come wars and fightings. These God gave them up to, and so might be said to send the evil spirits between them. When men's sin is made their punishment, though God is not the author of the sin, yet the punishment is from him. The quarrel God had with Abimelech and the Shechemites was for the murder of the sons of Gideon (Jdg 9:24): That the cruelty done to them might come and their blood be laid as a burden upon Abimelech that slew them, and the men of Shechem that helped him. Note, 1. Sooner or later God will make inquisition for blood, innocent blood, and will return it on the heads of those that shed it, who shall have blood given them to drink, for they are worthy. 2. Accessaries shall be reckoned with, as well as principals, in that and other sins. The Shechemites that countenanced Abimelech's pretensions, aided and abetted him in his bloody project, and avowed the fact by making him king after he had done it, must fall with him, fall by him, and fall first. 3. Those that combine together to do wickedly are justly dashed in pieces one against another. Blood cannot be a lasting cement to any interest.

I. The Shechemites began to affront Abimelech, perhaps they scarcely knew why or wherefore, but they were given to change. 1. They dealt treacherously with him, Jdg 9:23. It is not said, They repented of their sin in owning him. Had they done so, it would have been laudable to disown him; but they did it only upon some particular pique conceived against him by their pride or envy. Those that set him up were the first that deserted him and endeavoured to dethrone him. It is not strange that those who were ungrateful to Gideon were unfaithful to Abimelech; for what will hold those that will not be held by the obligation of such merits as Gideon's? Note, It is just with God that those who tempt others to be cone perfidious should afterwards be themselves betrayed by those whom they have taught to be perfidious. 2. They aimed to seize him when he was at Arumah (Jdg 9:41), his country-seat. Expecting him to come to town, they set liers in wait for him (Jdg 9:25), who should make him their prisoner whom they had lately made their prince. Those who were thus posted, he not coming, took the opportunity of robbing travellers, which would help to make the people more and more uneasy under Abimelech, when they saw he could not or would not protect them from highway-men. 3. They entertained one Gaal, and set him up as their head in opposition to Abimelech, Jdg 9:26. This Gaal is said to be the son of Ebed, which signifies a servant, perhaps denoting the meanness of his extraction. As Abimelech was by the mother's side, so he by the father's, the son of a servant. Here was one bramble contesting with another. We have reason to suspect that this Gaal was a native Canaanite, because he courts the Shechemites into subjection to the men of Hamor, who was the ancient lord of this city in Jacob's time. He was a bold ambitious man, served their purpose admirably well when they were disposed to quarrel with Abimelech, and they also served his purpose; so he went over to them to blow the coals, and they put their confidence in him. 4. They did all the despite they could to Abimelech's name, Jdg 9:27. They made themselves very merry in his absence, as those who were glad he was out of the way, and who, now that they had another to head them, were in hopes to get clear of him; nay, they went into the house of their god, to solemnize their feast of in-gathering, and there they did eat, and drink, and cursed Abimelech, not only said all the ill they could of him in their table-talk and the song of their drunkards, but wished all the ill they could to him over their sacrifices, praying to their idol to destroy him. They drank healths to his confusion, and with as loud huzzas as ever they had drunk them to his prosperity. That very temple whence they had fetched money to set him up with did they now meet in to curse him and contrive his ruin. Had they deserted their idol-god with their image-king, they might have hoped to prosper; but, while they still cleave to the former, the latter shall cleave to them to their ruin. How should Satan cast out Satan? 5. They pleased themselves with Gaal's vaunted defiance of Abimelech, Jdg 9:28, Jdg 9:29. They loved to hear that impudent upstart speak scornfully, (1.) Of Abimelech, though calling him in disdain Shechem, or a Shechemite, he reflected upon their own city. (2.) Of his good father likewise, Gideon: Is not he the son of Jerubbaal? So he calls him, perhaps in an impious indignation at his name and memory for throwing down the altar of Baal, turning that to his reproach which was his praise. (3.) Of his prime minister of state, Zebul his officer, and ruler of the city. "We may well be ashamed to serve them, and need not be afraid to oppose them." Men of turbulent ambitious spirits thus despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. Gaal aimed not to recover Shechem's liberty, only to change their tyrant: "O that this people were under my hand! What I would do! I would challenge Abimelech to try titles for the crown;" and it should seem he desired his friends to send him word that he was ready to dispute it with him whenever he pleased: "Increase thy army, and come out. Do thy worst; let the point be determined by the sword." This pleased the Shechemites, who were now as sick of Abimelech as ever they had been fond of him. Men of no conscience will be men of no constancy.

II. Abimelech turned all his force upon them, and, in a little time, quite ruined them. Observe the steps of their overthrow.

1.The Shechemites' counsels were betrayed to Abimelech by Zebul his confidant, the ruler of the city, who continued hearty for him. His anger was kindled (Jdg 9:30), and the more because Gaal had spoken slightly of him (Jdg 9:28), for perhaps, if he had complimented and caressed him now that things were in this ferment, he might have gained him to his interest; but he, being disobliged, sends notice to Abimelech of all that was said and done in Shechem against him, Jdg 9:31. Betrayers are often betrayed by some among themselves, and the cursing of the king is sometimes strangely carried by a bird of the air. He prudently advises him to come against the city immediately, and lose no time, Jdg 9:32, Jdg 9:33. He thinks it best that he should march his forces by night into the neighbourhood, surprise the city in the morning, and then make the best of his advantages. How could the Shechemites hope to speed in their attempt when the ruler of their city was in the interests of their enemy? They knew it, and yet took no care to secure him.

2.Gaal, that headed their faction, having been betrayed by Zebul, Abimelech's confidant, was most wretchedly bantered by him. Abimelech, according to Zebul's advice, drew all his forces down upon Shechem by night, Jdg 9:34. Gaal, in the morning, went out to the gate (Jdg 9:35) to see what posture things were in, and to enquire, What news? Zebul, as a ruler of the city, met him there as a friend. Abimelech and his forces beginning to move towards the city, Gaal discovers them (Jdg 9:36), takes notice of their approach to Zebul that was standing with him, little thinking that he had sent for them and was now expecting them. "Look," says he, "do not I see a body of men coming down from the mountain towards us? Yonder they are," pointing to the place. "No, no," says Zebul; "thy eye-sight deceives thee; it is but the shadow of the mountains which thou takest to be an army." By this he intended, (1.) To ridicule him, as a man of no sense or spirit, and therefore very unfit for what he pretended to, as a man that might easily be imposed upon and made to believe any thing, and that was so silly and so cowardly that he apprehended danger where there was none, and was ready to fight with a shadow. (2.) To detain him, and hold him in talk, while the forces of Abimelech were coming up, that thereby they might gain advantage. But when Gaal, being content to believe those he now saw to be but the shadow of the mountains (perhaps the mountains of Ebal and Gerizim, which lay close by the city), was undeceived by the discovery of two other companies that marched apace towards the city, then Zebul took another way to banter him, upbraiding him with what he had said but a day or two before, in contempt of Abimelech (Jdg 9:38): Where is now thy mouth, that foul mouth of thine, wherewith thou saidst, Who is Abimelech? Note, Proud and haughty people are often made in a little time to change their note, and to dread those whom they had most despised. Gaal had, in a bravado, challenged Abimelech to increase his army and come out; but now Zebul, in Abimelech's name, challenges him: Go out, and fight with them, if thou darest. Justly are the insolent thus insulted over.

3.Abimelech routed Gaal's forces that sallied out of the town, Jdg 9:39, Jdg 9:40. Gaal, disheartened no doubt by Zebul's hectoring him, and perceiving his interest weaker than he thought it was, though he marched out against Abimelech with what little force he had, was soon put to the worst, and obliged to retire into the city with great precipitation. In this action the Shechemites' loss was considerable: Many were overthrown and wounded, the common effect of popular tumults, in which the inconsiderate multitude are often drawn into fatal snare by those that promise them glorious success.

4.Zebul that night expelled Gaal, and the party he had brought with him into Shechem, out of the city (Jdg 9:41), sending him to the place whence he came. For though the generality of the city continued still averse to Abimelech, as appears by the sequel of the story, yet they were willing to part with Gaal, and did not oppose his expulsion, because, though he had talked big, both his skill and courage had failed him when there was occasion for them. Most people judge of men's fitness for business by their success, and he that does not speed well is concluded not to do well. Well, Gaal's interest in Shechem is soon at an end, and he that had talked of removing Abimelech is himself removed, nor do we ever hear of him any more. Exit Gaal - Gaal retires.

5.Abimelech, the next day, set upon the city, and quite destroyed it, for their treacherous dealings with him. Perhaps Abimelech had notice of their expelling Gaal, who had headed the faction, with which they thought he would have been satisfied, but the crime was too keep to be thus atoned for, and his resentments were too keen to be pacified by so small an instance of submission, besides that it was more Zebul's act than theirs; by it their hands were weakened, and therefore he resolved to follow his blow, and effectually to chastise their treachery. (1.) He had intelligence brought him that the people of Shechem had come out into the field, Jdg 9:42. Some think into the field of business to plough and sow (having lately gathered in their harvest), or to perfect their harvest, for it was only their vintage that they had made an end of (Jdg 9:27), and then it intimates that they were secure. And because Abimelech had retired (Jdg 9:41) they thought themselves in no danger from him, and then the issue of it is an instance of sudden destruction coming upon those that cry, Peace and safety. Others think they went out into the field of battle; though Gaal was driven out, they would not lay down their arms, but put themselves into a posture for another engagement with Abimelech, in which they hoped to retrieve what they had lost the day before, (2.) He himself, with a strong detachment, cut off the communication between them and the city, stood in the entering of the gate (Jdg 9:44), that they might neither make their retreat into the city nor receive any succours from the city, and then sent two companies of his men, who were too strong for them, and they put them all to the sword, ran upon those that were in the fields and slew them. When we go out about our business we are not sure that we shall come home again; there are deaths both in the city and in the field. (3.) He then fell upon the city itself, and, with a rage reaching up to heaven, though it was the place of his nativity, laid it in ruins, slew all the people, beat down all the buildings, and, in token of his desire that it might be a perpetual desolation, sowed it with salt, that it might remain a lasting monument of the punishment of perfidiousness. Yet Abimelech prevailed not to make its desolations perpetual; for it was afterwards rebuilt, and became so considerable a place that all Israel came thither to make Rehoboam king, Kg1 12:1. And the place proved an ill omen. Abimelech intended hereby to punish the Shechemites for their serving him formerly in the murder of Gideon's sons. Thus, when God makes use of men as instruments in his hand to do his work, he means one thing and they another, Isa 10:6, Isa 10:7. They design to maintain their honour, but God to maintain his.

6.Those that retired into a strong-hold of their idol-temple were all destroyed there. These are called the men of the tower of Shechem (Jdg 9:46, Jdg 9:47), some castle that belonged to the city, but lay at some distance from it. They, hearing of the destruction of the city, withdrew into a hold of the temple, trusting, it is likely, not so much to its strength as to its sanctity; they put themselves under the protection of their idol: for thus all people will walk in the name of their god, and shall not we then choose to dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of our life? For in the time of trouble he shall hide us in his pavilion, Psa 27:5. The name of the Lord is a strong tower, Pro 18:10. But that which they hoped would be for their welfare proved to them a snare and a trap, as those will certainly find that run to idols for shelter; it will prove a refuge of lies. When Abimelech had them altogether penned up in that hold he desired no more. That barbarous project immediately came into his head of setting fire to the strong-hold, and, so to speak, burning all the birds together in the nest. He kept the design to himself, but set all his men on work to expedite the execution of it, Jdg 9:48, Jdg 9:49. He ordered them all to follow him, and do as he did: as his father had said to his men (Jdg 7:17), Look on me, and do likewise; so saith he to his, as becomes a general that will not be wanting to give both the plainest direction and the highest encouragement that can be to his soldiers: What you have seen me do make haste to do, as I have done. Not Ite illuc - Go thither; but Venite huc - Come hither. The officers in Christ's army should thus teach by their example, Phi 4:9. He and they fetched each of them a bough from a wood not far off, laid all their boughs together under the wall of this tower, which it is probable was of wood, set fire to their boughs, and so burnt down their hold and all that were in it, who were either burnt or stifled with the smoke. What inventions men have to destroy one another! Whence come these cruel wars and fightings but from their lusts? Some think that the men of the tower of Shechem were the same with the house of Millo, and then Jotham's just imprecation was answered in the letter: Let fire come out from Abimelech, and devour not only in general the men of Shechem, but in particular the house of Millo, Jdg 9:20. About 1000 men and women perished in these flames, many of whom, it is probable, were no way concerned in the quarrel between Abimelech and the Shechemites, nor meddled with either side, yet, in this civil war, they came to this miserable end; for men of factious turbulent spirits perish not alone in their iniquity, but involve many more, that follow them in their simplicity, in the same calamity with them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 22–49. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 9:43 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.