Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they said, There must be an inheritance for them that be escaped of Benjamin, that a tribe be not destroyed out of Israel.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they said H559, There must be an inheritance H3425 for them that be escaped H6413 of Benjamin H1144, that a tribe H7626 be not destroyed H4229 out of Israel H3478.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They said, "There has to be a way to help the survivors preserve Binyamin's inheritance, so that a tribe will not be eliminated from Isra'el.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They added, “There must be heirs for the survivors of Benjamin, so that a tribe of Israel will not be wiped out.
Ask
American Standard Version
And they said, There must be an inheritance for them that are escaped of Benjamin, that a tribe be not blotted out from Israel.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They said, “There must be an inheritance for those who are escaped of Benjamin, that a tribe not be blotted out from Israel.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And they saide, there must be an inheritance for them that be escaped of Beniamin, that a tribe be not destroyed out of Israel.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they say, `A possession of an escaped party is to Benjamin, and a tribe is not blotted out from Israel;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Sins of the Benjaminites
Sins of the Benjaminites View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,120 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 21:17 encapsulates the profound anguish and urgent resolve of the Israelite tribes as they confront the near annihilation of Benjamin, one of the twelve tribes of Israel, following a devastating civil war. This verse articulates their collective realization that, despite the initial justice of their retribution against Benjamin, the potential extinction of an entire tribal lineage represented an unacceptable breach in the divinely ordained structure of Israel. It underscores their desperate search for a solution to ensure the preservation of Benjamin's inheritance and their place within the covenant community, thereby preventing the permanent loss of one of God's chosen tribes.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 21:17 is situated at the dramatic climax of one of the most disturbing narratives in the book of Judges, spanning chapters 19-21. This segment details the horrific rape and murder of a Levite's concubine in Gibeah of Benjamin, igniting a brutal civil war where the other tribes of Israel sought punitive justice against Benjamin. The preceding chapters meticulously recount the near-total destruction of Benjamin, leaving only 600 men alive. The immediate context of Judges 21 involves the remaining tribes lamenting their actions and realizing the catastrophic implications of their solemn oath at Mizpah, where they swore not to give their daughters in marriage to Benjamin. This verse marks a pivotal moment where the narrative focus shifts dramatically from punitive justice and lamentation to a desperate, if morally compromised, search for the preservation and restoration of a diminished tribe, highlighting the deep dilemma faced by the Israelite assembly.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Judges depicts a chaotic and morally ambiguous period in Israel's history, characterized by a distinct lack of central leadership, widespread moral decay, and a recurring cycle of apostasy, oppression, and deliverance. The oft-repeated refrain, "in those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes," found in Judges 21:25, perfectly encapsulates the societal breakdown that led to such extreme violence and desperate measures. The concept of "inheritance" (Hebrew: nachalah) was foundational to Israelite identity and the covenant with God, signifying not merely land ownership but a divinely allotted portion that connected each tribe to the Promised Land and their future within the nation. The potential loss of a tribe, therefore, was not just a demographic issue but a profound theological crisis, threatening the very structure of the twelve tribes descended from Jacob, which represented the fullness and integrity of God's people.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Judges and the broader Old Testament. Firstly, it highlights the preservation of God's covenant people, emphasizing that even in their darkest moments of human failure and moral compromise, there was a deep-seated recognition of the importance of maintaining the integrity of the twelve tribes, a foundational element of God's plan for Israel. Secondly, it underscores the devastating consequences of rash vows and unbridled sin. The initial heinous crime in Judges 19 spiraled into a civil war, leading to the unintended consequence of Benjamin's near extinction, forcing the Israelites to confront the ripple effects of their actions and oaths. Thirdly, it reveals the human, albeit flawed, attempt at rectification and restoration. Despite the moral chaos, the tribes recognized the dire situation and sought a way to correct their errors and ensure Benjamin's survival, even if their methods (such as the abduction of women from Jabesh-Gilead and Shiloh) were themselves ethically questionable, reflecting the pervasive moral ambiguity of the era.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Inheritance (Hebrew, yᵉrushshâh', H3425): This term (H3425) is central to the verse's meaning. It refers to an allotted possession, typically land, which was foundational to the identity, economic stability, and future of each Israelite tribe and family. It was not merely property but a divinely given heritage, connecting the people to the covenant promises of God concerning the land of Canaan. The concern for Benjamin's "inheritance" implies a desire to re-establish their tribal identity, secure their place within the land, and enable them to flourish as a distinct lineage within Israel, fulfilling the promise of tribal land distribution (Numbers 26:52-56).
  • Destroyed (Hebrew, mâchâh', H4229): The verb (H4229) signifies utter annihilation, to be completely cut off or wiped out. Its use here emphasizes the existential threat to the tribe of Benjamin. The thought of one of the twelve tribes being "destroyed out of Israel" was abhorrent, as it would diminish the complete identity of God's chosen people and undermine the divinely established tribal structure that originated with Jacob's sons. It highlights the gravity of the situation and the perceived necessity of preventing such a catastrophic outcome.
  • Tribe (Hebrew, shêbeṭ', H7626): This word (H7626) denotes a clan or a branch, often represented by a staff or rod, symbolizing authority and lineage. In the context of Israel, "tribe" refers to one of the twelve divisions of the nation, each descended from one of Jacob's sons. The potential for a "tribe" to be "destroyed out of Israel" was a national and theological catastrophe, threatening the very fabric of the covenant community and the fulfillment of God's promises regarding the multitude of His people.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they said": This phrase refers to the collective voice of the Israelite assembly, representing the remaining tribes who had gathered after the civil war. It signifies a moment of shared realization, lament, and deliberation, as they collectively acknowledged the unintended and devastating consequences of their actions against Benjamin. It underscores a shift from punitive action to a desperate search for resolution and restoration.
  • "[There must be] an inheritance for them that be escaped of Benjamin": This clause reveals the core problem and the proposed solution. The survivors of Benjamin (only 600 men) needed not just wives but also a land inheritance to rebuild their tribe. Without an inheritance, they would have no place to settle, no means of livelihood, and no foundation upon which to re-establish their families and tribal identity within Israel. The phrase "escaped of Benjamin" highlights the miraculous and precarious nature of their survival, emphasizing their status as a remnant clinging to existence.
  • "that a tribe be not destroyed out of Israel": This final clause articulates the ultimate motivation behind their actions. The primary concern was to prevent the complete eradication of one of the twelve tribes. The idea of a tribe being "destroyed" was antithetical to God's covenant plan and the integrity of the nation. This statement reflects a theological and national imperative to preserve the tribal structure, even if it required morally ambiguous means to achieve it, demonstrating a deep, albeit flawed, commitment to the integrity of God's people.

Literary Devices

The narrative culminating in Judges 21:17 is rich with literary devices that amplify its tragic and complex themes. Irony is pervasive, as the tribes, in their zealous pursuit of justice against Benjamin, inadvertently bring the tribe to the brink of extinction, forcing them to then devise ethically questionable means to preserve the very tribe they almost destroyed. This creates a deeply Tragic atmosphere, where righteous indignation leads to devastating consequences, highlighting the moral chaos of the era where "every man did that which was right in his own eyes." The repeated emphasis on the "destruction" of a tribe and the desperate need for "inheritance" also functions as Thematic Repetition, reinforcing the gravity of the situation and the foundational importance of tribal identity and land in Israelite society. The entire account serves as a powerful Cautionary Tale, illustrating the dangers of unbridled human passion, rash vows, and the absence of clear, God-centered leadership.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 21:17, while depicting a dark chapter in Israel's history, profoundly illuminates God's enduring commitment to His covenant people, even when they falter. The desperate desire to preserve Benjamin reflects a latent understanding of God's design for Israel as a twelve-tribe nation, a structure ordained by divine promise. Despite human sin, violence, and moral compromise, the narrative reveals a providential undercurrent that seeks to maintain the integrity of Israel, demonstrating that God's purposes for His people are resilient even amidst their darkest failures. This verse implicitly points to the sanctity of life and the importance of community, reminding us that the loss of any part diminishes the whole, echoing a divine desire for preservation and continuity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Judges 21:17 serves as a stark reminder of the profound and often unintended consequences of human actions, particularly when guided by passion rather than divine wisdom. It challenges us to consider the long-term ripple effects of our decisions, even those made with seemingly good intentions. The Israelites' urgent desire to preserve Benjamin underscores the inherent value of every member within a community—whether family, church, or society—and the importance of actively seeking restorative solutions when harm has been done. It also highlights the critical need for wise, godly leadership and adherence to moral principles, as the absence of such guidance can lead to societal breakdown and desperate, ethically compromised measures. Ultimately, this verse, set against the backdrop of human failure, subtly points to a divine principle of preservation and the hope for restoration, even when circumstances seem irredeemable, urging us to pursue reconciliation and the flourishing of all within God's design.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do our actions, even those intended for justice, sometimes lead to unintended and devastating consequences?
  • In what ways do we, as individuals or communities, sometimes prioritize immediate retribution over long-term restoration and preservation?
  • What does the Israelites' desperate attempt to preserve Benjamin teach us about the value of every individual and group within a community or the body of Christ?
  • How can we cultivate wisdom and seek God's guidance to avoid rash decisions and ensure our actions align with His restorative purposes?

FAQ

Why was the preservation of the tribe of Benjamin so important to the other Israelites, given the horrific crime they had committed?

Answer: The preservation of Benjamin was crucial because the Israelites understood themselves as a twelve-tribe nation, divinely ordained from the time of Jacob's sons. The loss of any one tribe would diminish the complete identity of God's chosen people and break the sacred structure established by covenant. While the crime committed by the Benjamites was heinous and demanded justice, the unintended consequence of near-annihilation was seen as a theological catastrophe, threatening the very integrity and fulfillment of God's promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob concerning their numerous descendants and their inheritance in the land. Their concern was not merely demographic but deeply rooted in their understanding of their national and covenantal identity.

How did the Israelites ultimately provide an inheritance and wives for the surviving Benjamites?

Answer: The Israelites faced a severe dilemma due to their oath not to give their daughters to Benjamin. Their solution, detailed in Judges 21:8-23, involved two morally questionable actions. First, they discovered that the inhabitants of Jabesh-Gilead had not participated in the war, so they attacked them, killing all but 400 virgins, whom they then gave to the Benjamites as wives. Second, because this was still insufficient, they instructed the remaining Benjamites to lie in wait at the annual feast in Shiloh and abduct young women who came out to dance, taking them as wives. These actions highlight the moral chaos of the period "when there was no king in Israel" and "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Judges 21:17, with its desperate plea for the preservation of a remnant and the restoration of an inheritance, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The Israelites' concern for Benjamin's inheritance points to a deeper spiritual reality: humanity's lost inheritance due to sin. Through the fall, humanity lost its rightful place and inheritance in God's presence, leading to spiritual "destruction." Yet, God, in His sovereign love, did not desire that humanity be utterly "destroyed out of" His creation. Instead, He provided a perfect solution through His Son. Jesus Christ, the true King of Israel, came not to destroy but to seek and to save that which was lost (Luke 19:10). He is the ultimate "inheritance" for believers, granting us an imperishable, undefiled, and unfading inheritance kept in heaven (1 Peter 1:3-4). Unlike the flawed, human-devised solutions in Judges, Christ's work on the cross provides a perfect, righteous, and complete redemption, restoring us to a covenant relationship and securing our eternal inheritance, ensuring that none who are truly His will be "destroyed out of" His eternal kingdom (John 6:39). He is the true leader who brings order out of chaos and provides a way for His people to live righteously, fulfilling the longing for a king who does what is right in God's eyes, not merely their own.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 21 verses 16–25

We have here the method that was taken to provide the 200 Benjamites that remained with wives. And, though the tribe was reduced to a small number, they were only in care to provide each man with one wife, not with more under pretence of multiplying them the faster. They may not bestow their daughters upon them, but to save their oath, and yet marry some of their daughters to them, they put them into a way of taking them by surprise, and marrying them, which should be ratified by their parents' consent, ex post facto - afterwards. The less consideration is used before the making of a vow, the more, commonly, there is need of afterwards for the keeping of it.

I. That which gave an opportunity for the doing of this was a public ball at Shiloh, in the fields, at which all the young ladies of that city and the parts adjacent that were so disposed met to dance, in honour of a feast of the Lord then observed, probably the feast of tabernacles (Jdg 21:19), for that feast (bishop Patrick says) was the only season wherein the Jewish virgins were allowed to dance, and that not so much for their own recreation as to express their holy joy, as David when he danced before the ark, otherwise the present melancholy posture of public affairs would have made dancing unseasonable, as Isa 22:12, Isa 22:13. The dancing was very modest and chaste. It was not mixed dancing; no men danced with these daughters of Shiloh, nor did any married women so far forget their gravity as to join with them. However their dancing thus in public made them an easy prey to those that had a design upon them, whence bishop Hall observes that the ambushes of evil spirits carry away many souls from dancing to a fearful desolation.

II. The elders of Israel gave authority to the Benjamites to do this, to lie in wait in the vineyards which surrounded the green they used to dance on, and, when they were in the midst of their sport, to come upon them, and catch every man a wife for himself, and carry them straight away to their own country, Jdg 21:20, Jdg 21:21. They knew that none of their own daughters would be there, so that the parents of these virgins could not be said to give them, for they knew nothing of the matter. A sorry salvo is better than none, to save the breaking of an oath: it were much better to be cautious in making vows, that there be not occasion afterwards, as there was here, to say before the angel that it was an error. Here was a very preposterous way of match-making, when both the mutual affection of the young people and the consent of the parents must be presumed to come after; the case was extraordinary, and may by no means be drawn into a precedent. Over hasty marriages often occasion a leisurely repentance; and what comfort can be expected from a match made either by force or fraud? The virgins of Jabesh-Gilead were taken out of the midst of blood and slaughter, but these of Shiloh out of the midst of mirth and joy; the former had reason to be thankful that they had their lives for a prey, and the latter, it is to be hoped, had no cause to complain, after a while, when they found themselves matched, not to men of broken and desperate fortunes, as they seemed to be, who were lately fetched out of a cave, but to men of the best and largest estates in the nation, as they must needs be when the lot of the whole tribe of Benjamin, which consisted of 45,600 men (Num 26:41), came to be divided again among 600, who had all by survivorship.

III. They undertook to pacify the fathers of these young women. As to the infringement of their paternal authority, they would easily forgive it when they considered to what fair estates their daughters were matched and what mothers in Israel they were likely to be; but the oath they were bound by, not to give their daughters to Benjamites, might perhaps stick with some of them, whose consciences were tender, yet, as to that, this might satisfy them: - 1. That the necessity was urgent (Jdg 21:22): We reserved not to each man his wife, owning now that they did ill to destroy all the women, and desiring to atone for their too rigorous construction of their vow to destroy them by the most favourable construction of their vow not to match with them. "And therefore for our sakes, who were too severe, let them keep what they have got." For, 2. In strictness it was not a breach of their vow; they had sworn not to give them their daughters, but they had not sworn to fetch them back if they were forcibly taken, so that if there was any fault the elders must be responsible, not the parents. And Quod fieri non debuit, factum valet - That which ought not to have been done is yet valid when it is done. The thing was done, and is ratified only by connivance, according to the law, Num 30:4.

Lastly, In the close of all we have, 1. The settling of the tribe of Benjamin again. The few that remained returned to the inheritance of that tribe, Jdg 21:23. And soon after from among them sprang Ehud, who was famous in his generation, the second judge of Israel, Jdg 3:15. 2. The disbanding and dispersing of the army of Israel, Jdg 21:24. They did not set up for a standing army, nor pretend to make any alterations or establishments in the government; but when the affair was over for which they were called together, they quietly departed in God's peace, every man to his family. Public services must not make us think ourselves above our own private affairs and the duty of providing for our own house. 3. A repetition of the cause of these confusions, Jdg 21:25. Though God was their King, every man would be his own master, as if there was no king. Blessed be God for magistracy.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–25. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On the Duties of the Clergy 3.19.115
The sentence, further, was that none of the people of the ancestors should give his daughter in marriage to [members of Benjamin’s tribe]. This was confirmed by a solemn oath. But relenting at having laid so hard a sentence on their brothers, they moderated their severity so as to give them in marriage those maidens that had lost their parents, whose fathers had been slain for their sins, or to give them the means of finding a wife by a raid. Because of the villainy of so foul a deed, they who had violated another’s marriage rights were shown to be unworthy to ask for marriage. But for fear that one tribe might perish from the people, they connived at the deceit.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 21:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.