Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For he found H4672 her in the field H7704, and the betrothed H781 damsel H5291 cried H6817, and there was none to save H3467 her.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
For he found her in the countryside, and the engaged girl cried out, but there was no one to save her.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When he found her in the field, the betrothed woman cried out, but there was no one to save her.
Ask
American Standard Version
for he found her in the field, the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
for he found her in the field, the pledged to be married lady cried, and there was no one to save her.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For he found her in the fieldes: the betrothed mayde cryed, and there was no man to succour her.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
for in a field he found her, she hath cried--the damsel who is betrothed--and she hath no saviour.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 5,498 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 22:27 addresses a specific legal scenario concerning sexual assault against a betrothed woman in an isolated setting. This verse establishes the woman's complete innocence and the assailant's full culpability by emphasizing her desperate cry for help and the complete absence of anyone to intervene, thereby differentiating it from cases where consent might be presumed due to opportunity for intervention. It underscores God's profound concern for justice, the protection of the vulnerable, and the clear distinction between consensual and forced acts within the Mosaic Law.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Deuteronomy 22:27 is part of a broader section of Mosaic law found in Deuteronomy 22:13-30 that deals with sexual offenses and marital integrity, following regulations concerning property and civil disputes. Specifically, this verse forms a crucial counterpoint to the preceding verses, Deuteronomy 22:23-24. Those verses describe a similar offense occurring within a city, where the woman's failure to cry out would imply complicity, leading to the death of both parties. Verse 27, by contrast, explicitly addresses the scenario in an isolated "field," highlighting the critical role of location and the woman's inability to seek help as factors that entirely absolve her of guilt and place full blame on the assailant. This legal distinction demonstrates the nuanced and just application of the law, recognizing differing circumstances and ensuring equitable judgment.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, betrothal was a legally binding agreement, far more serious than a modern engagement. It was the first stage of marriage, often involving a bride-price paid by the groom's family to the bride's family, and could only be dissolved by divorce or death. A betrothed woman was legally considered "married" in many respects, though she had not yet moved into her husband's home. Therefore, sexual intercourse with a betrothed woman was considered adultery, a capital offense (Deuteronomy 22:22). The "field" (שָׂדֶה, sadeh') refers to an open, unpopulated area, distinct from the "city" (עִיר, 'iyr') or "gate" where public life and justice were administered. This geographical distinction was paramount, as it determined the presumption of consent or coercion based on the availability of witnesses or help, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of legal evidence in a pre-modern society.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several key themes within Deuteronomy and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it exemplifies Divine Justice and Equity, demonstrating God's meticulous concern for fair judgment that considers all circumstances, ensuring that the innocent are not condemned. The law's careful differentiation between the city and the field underscores a sophisticated understanding of legal principles, preventing false accusations and ensuring due process. Secondly, it highlights the Protection of the Vulnerable. The Mosaic Law consistently champions the cause of the helpless, and here, it explicitly safeguards a woman who is physically overpowered and isolated, ensuring she is not blamed for a crime committed against her. This aligns with broader biblical calls to defend the weak, as seen in Psalm 82:3. Thirdly, the verse implicitly but powerfully addresses the theme of Consent. The woman's cry ("cried") is presented as irrefutable evidence of her lack of consent and active resistance, making the act unequivocally an assault. This emphasis on her distress and inability to be saved underscores the violent and non-consensual nature of the act.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Found (Hebrew, mâtsâʼ', H4672): This primitive root (H4672) properly means "to come forth to, i.e. appear or exist; transitively, to attain, i.e. find or acquire; figuratively, to occur, meet or be present." In this context, "he found her" implies a discovery or encounter in a specific location, setting the scene for the subsequent events and emphasizing the assailant's initiation of the encounter in an isolated place.
  • Damsel (Hebrew, naʻărâh', H5291): This feminine noun (H5291) refers to "a girl (from infancy to adolescence); damsel, maid(-en), young (woman)." The use of "damsel" here emphasizes her youth and vulnerability, while the preceding modifier "betrothed" (H781, ʼâras', "to engage for matrimony") highlights her legal status as already belonging to another man, making the act a grave violation of both her person and marital integrity.
  • Cried (Hebrew, tsâʻaq', H6817): This primitive root (H6817) means "to shriek; (by implication) to proclaim (an assembly); [idiom] at all, call together, cry (out), gather (selves) (together)." In this legal context, the woman's "cried" signifies a loud, desperate, and audible expression of protest and distress. It serves as irrefutable evidence of her non-consent and her active struggle against the assailant, legally absolving her of any complicity and confirming the violent nature of the act.
  • Save (Hebrew, yâshaʻ', H3467): This primitive root (H3467) properly means "to be open, wide or free, i.e. (by implication) to be safe; causatively, to free or succor." The phrase "none to save her" emphasizes the complete helplessness of the betrothed damsel. Despite her desperate cries, there was no one present or able to intervene and rescue her from the assault. This reinforces the involuntary nature of the act and solidifies her status as a victim of overwhelming force, absolving her of any blame under the law.

Verse Breakdown

  • "For he found her in the field": This opening clause establishes the critical setting of the incident. The "field" (שָׂדֶה, sadeh') signifies an isolated, unpopulated location, away from the watchful eyes and potential intervention of others. This geographical detail is paramount, as it directly impacts the legal presumption of the woman's culpability, contrasting sharply with a similar event occurring in a populated area like a city. It highlights the assailant's deliberate choice of an isolated place to commit the crime.
  • "[and] the betrothed damsel cried": This phrase is the core legal evidence of the woman's innocence and the assailant's guilt. Her "cry" (צָעַק, tsa'aq') is a loud, desperate appeal for help, an unequivocal expression of her non-consent and active resistance to the assault. This active protest differentiates her from a willing participant and serves as a definitive legal defense against any accusation of complicity, demonstrating her victimhood.
  • "and [there was] none to save her": This final clause powerfully reinforces the extreme vulnerability and helplessness of the victim. Despite her desperate cries, no one was present or able to intervene and rescue her. This complete absence of aid confirms that she was a victim of overwhelming force, unable to escape or defend herself, thereby solidifying her blamelessness in the eyes of the law. It underscores the severity of the crime and the assailant's sole culpability.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 22:27 primarily employs Legal Distinction as its central literary device, sharply contrasting the "field" scenario with the "city" scenario presented in Deuteronomy 22:23-24. This Contrast highlights the nuanced application of justice based on environmental factors and the opportunity for intervention. The verse also utilizes Implied Narrative, where a concise legal statement evokes a vivid and distressing scene: a vulnerable woman, isolated, crying out in terror, with no one to hear or help. The phrase "none to save her" functions as a powerful Understatement of her dire predicament, emphasizing her complete helplessness and the overwhelming nature of the assault. The woman's "cried" acts as both a Metonymy for her resistance and a Symbol of her innocence, serving as the irrefutable proof of her victimhood and the non-consensual nature of the act.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Deuteronomy 22:27 profoundly reflects God's character as a righteous judge who is deeply concerned with justice, particularly for the vulnerable and oppressed. It reveals a divine legal system that is not only strict but also remarkably nuanced and compassionate, differentiating between circumstances to ensure equitable judgment. This law establishes a foundational principle: true justice requires considering the context of a crime, especially when it involves power imbalances and the victim's ability to resist or seek help. It underscores that God values individual dignity and autonomy, condemning any act of coercion or violence. The emphasis on the woman's cry and the absence of a rescuer highlights God's abhorrence of sexual violence and His unwavering commitment to protecting those who are helpless and exploited. This divine concern for justice resonates throughout the Scriptures, calling believers to emulate God's character in seeking justice for the marginalized in their own societies.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Deuteronomy 22:27, though rooted in ancient legal codes, offers timeless principles for contemporary life. It challenges us to cultivate a profound empathy for victims of injustice and to actively dismantle systems or attitudes that might blame the victim. The law's careful distinction between the "field" and the "city" reminds us that context matters immensely in evaluating situations and assigning culpability. We are called to be discerning, to listen to the cries of the vulnerable, and to recognize that silence or an inability to escape does not equate to consent. This passage compels us to consider how we, as individuals and communities, can create environments where the vulnerable are protected, where cries for help are heard and acted upon, and where justice is pursued with both rigor and compassion. It reminds us that our God is a God of justice who sees and hears the oppressed, and we are called to be His hands and feet in advocating for them, ensuring that "none to save" becomes a call to action for the church.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the legal distinction between the "field" and the "city" in this passage challenge our modern understanding of consent and victim-blaming?
  • In what ways can we, as individuals and communities, better "hear the cry" of those who are vulnerable or oppressed, especially when they may be isolated or unable to overtly express their distress?
  • What practical steps can we take to ensure that our legal and social systems embody the same nuanced justice and protection for the vulnerable as seen in this ancient law?

FAQ

Does this law imply that a woman is guilty if she doesn't cry out in the city?

Answer: The Mosaic Law in Deuteronomy 22:23-24 states that if a betrothed woman is assaulted in the city and does not cry out, both she and the assailant are to be put to death. The legal reasoning behind this is the presumption that in a populated area like a city, her cries would have been heard, and help would have been available. Her silence, therefore, was interpreted as a form of complicity or consent within that specific ancient legal framework. However, it's crucial to understand this within its historical and cultural context, which prioritized public justice and clear distinctions based on the availability of witnesses. Deuteronomy 22:27 directly addresses this by providing the counter-example of the "field," where the absence of potential rescuers unequivocally proves her innocence regardless of her cry. The overarching principle is that the law sought to protect the truly helpless and distinguish between forced acts and those with perceived consent in a public setting, demonstrating a sophisticated, albeit ancient, legal nuance.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 22:27, with its profound emphasis on justice for the vulnerable and the rescue of the helpless, finds its ultimate fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The law highlights the desperate cry of one with "none to save her," a poignant reflection of humanity's own spiritual predicament. We, too, are found in a "field" of sin and brokenness, utterly helpless and unable to save ourselves from its devastating consequences. It is here that Christ steps in as the ultimate Rescuer. Just as the law protects the innocent woman, Jesus, the righteous judge, perfectly embodies divine justice, not only upholding the law but fulfilling it (Matthew 5:17). He is the one who heard the cries of a lost and perishing world, a world with "none to save" it from the power of sin and death (Romans 5:6). Through His sacrificial death on the cross, Jesus became our deliverer, providing salvation where none could be found elsewhere (John 3:16). He is the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, rescuing us from our spiritual isolation and helplessness, and bringing us into His glorious light and freedom. In Christ, the justice of God is perfectly met, and the helpless find their ultimate salvation and advocate, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to rescue those who are truly without help.

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 22 verses 13–30

These laws relate to the seventh commandment, laying a restraint by laying a penalty upon those fleshly lusts which war against the soul.

I. If a man, lusting after another woman, to get rid of his wife slander her and falsely accuse her, as not having the virginity she pretended to when he married her, upon the disproof of his slander he must be punished, Deu 22:13-19. What the meaning of that evidence is by which the husband's accusation was to be proved false the learned are not agreed, nor is it at all necessary to enquire - those for whom this law was intended, no doubt, understood it: it is sufficient for us to know that this wicked husband, who had thus endeavoured to ruin the reputation of his own wife, was to be scourged, and fined, and bound out from ever divorcing the wife he had thus abused, Deu 22:18, Deu 22:19. Upon his dislike of her he might have divorced her if he had pleased, by the permission of the law (Deu 24:1), but then he must have given her her dowry: if therefore to save that, and to do her the greater mischief, he would thus destroy her good name, it was fit that he should be severely punished for it, and for ever after forfeit the permission to divorce her. Observe, 1. The nearer any are in relation to us the greater sin it is to belie them and blemish their reputation. It is spoken of as a crime of the highest nature to slander thy own mother's son (Psa 50:20), who is next to thyself, much more to slander thy own wife, or thy own husband, that is thyself: it is an ill bird indeed that defiles its own nest. 2. Chastity is honour as well as virtue, and that which gives occasion for the suspicion of it is as great a reproach and disgrace as any whatsoever: in this matter therefore, above any thing, we should be highly tender both of our own good name and that of others. 3. Parents must look upon themselves as concerned to vindicate the reputation of their children, for it is a branch of their own.

II. If the woman that was married as a virgin was not found to be one she was to be stoned to death at her father's door, Deu 22:20, Deu 22:21. If the uncleanness had been committed before she was betrothed it would not have been punished as a capital crime; but she must die for the abuse she put upon him whom she married, being conscious to herself of being defiled, while she made him believe her to be a chaste and modest woman. But some think that her uncleanness was punished with death only in case it was committed after she was betrothed, supposing there were few come to maturity but what were betrothed, though not yet married. Now, 1. This gave a powerful caution to young women to flee fornication, since, however concealed before, so as not to mar their marriage, it would very likely be discovered afterwards, to their perpetual infamy and utter ruin. 2. It is intimated to parents that they must by all means possible preserve their children's chastity, by giving them good advice and admonition, setting them good examples, keeping them from bad company, praying for them, and laying them under needful restraints, because, if the children committed lewdness, the parents must have the grief and shame of the execution at their own door. That phrase of folly wrought in Israel was used concerning this very crime in the case of Dinah, Gen 34:7. All sin is folly, uncleanness especially; but, above all, uncleanness in Israel, by profession a holy people.

III. If any man, single or married, lay with a married woman, they were both to be put to death, Deu 22:22. This law we had before, Lev 20:10. For a married man to lie with a single woman was not a crime of so high a nature, nor was it punished with death, because not introducing a spurious brood into families under the character of legitimate children.

IV. If a damsel were betrothed and not married, she was from under the eye of her intended husband, and therefore she and her chastity were taken under the special protection of the law. 1. If her chastity were violated by her own consent, she was to be put to death, and her adulterer with her, Deu 22:23, Deu 22:24. And it shall be presumed that she consented if it were done in the city, or in any place where, had she cried out, help might speedily have come in to prevent the injury offered her. Qui tacet, consentire videtur - Silence implies consent. Note, It may be presumed that those willingly yield to a temptation (whatever they pretend) who will not use the means and helps they might be furnished with to avoid and overcome it. Nay, her being found in the city, a place of company and diversion, when she should have kept under the protection of her father's house, was an evidence against her that she had not that dread of the sin and the danger of it which became a modest woman. Note, Those that needlessly expose themselves to temptation justly suffer for the same, if, ere they are aware, they be surprised and caught by it. Dinah lost her honour to gratify her curiosity with a sight of the daughters of the land. By this law the Virgin Mary was in danger of being made a public example, that is, of being stoned to death, but that God, by an angel, cleared the matter to Joseph. 2. If she were forced, and never consented, he that committed the rape was to be put to death, but the damsel was to be acquitted, Deu 22:24-27. Now if it were done in the field, out of the hearing of neighbours, it shall be presumed that she cried out, but there was none to save her; and, besides, her going into the field, a place of solitude, did not so much expose her. Now by this law it is intimated to us, (1.) That we shall suffer only for the wickedness we do, not for that which is done to us. That is no sin which has not more or less of the will in it. (2.) That we must presume the best concerning all persons, unless the contrary do appear; not only charity, but equity teaches us to do so. Though none heard her cry, yet, because none could hear it if she did, it shall be taken for granted that she did. This rule we should go by in judging of persons and actions: believe all things, and hope all things. (3.) That our chastity should be as dear to us as our life when that is assaulted, it is not at all improper to cry murder, murder, for, as when a man riseth against his neighbour and slayeth him, even so is this matter. (4.) By way of allusion to this, see what we are to do when Satan sets upon us with his temptations: wherever we are, let us cry aloud to heaven for help (Succurre, Domine, vim patior - Help me, O Lord, for I suffer violence), and there we may be sure to be heard, and answered, as Paul was, My grace is sufficient for thee.

V. If a damsel not betrothed were thus abused by violence, he that abused her should be fined, the father should have the fine, and, if he and the damsel did consent, he should be bound to marry her, and never to divorce her, how much soever she was below him, and how unpleasing soever she might afterwards be to him, as Tamar was to Amnon after he had forced her, Deu 22:28, Deu 22:29. This was to deter men from such vicious practices, which it is a shame that we are necessitated to read and write of.

VI. The law against a man's marrying his father's widow, or having any undue familiarity with his father's wife, is here repeated (Deu 22:30) from Lev 18:8. And, probably, it is intended (as bishop Patrick notes) for a short memorandum to them carefully to observe all the laws there made against incestuous marriages, that being specified which is the most detestable of all; it is that of which the apostle says, It is not so much as named among the Gentiles, Co1 5:1.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–30. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 22:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.