Daniel 5:3
Then they brought the golden vessels that were taken out of the temple of the house of God which [was] at Jerusalem; and the king, and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, drank in them.
Then {H116} they brought {H858} the golden {H1722} vessels {H3984} that were taken {H5312} out of {H4481} the temple {H1965} of the house {H1005} of God {H426} which was at Jerusalem {H3390}; and the king {H4430}, and his princes {H7261}, his wives {H7695}, and his concubines {H3904}, drank {H8355} in them.
So they brought the gold vessels which had been removed from the sanctuary of the house of God in Yerushalayim; and the king, his lords, his wives and his concubines drank from them.
Thus they brought in the gold vessels that had been taken from the temple, the house of God in Jerusalem, and the king drank from them, along with his nobles, his wives, and his concubines.
Then they brought the golden vessels that were taken out of the temple of the house of God which was at Jerusalem; and the king and his lords, his wives and his concubines, drank from them.
Cross-References
No cross-references found.
Commentary
Daniel 5:3 describes a pivotal moment during King Belshazzarβs impious feast in Babylon, immediately preceding the dramatic appearance of the "writing on the wall."
Context
This verse directly follows Belshazzar's command to bring forth the sacred vessels from the Temple in Jerusalem. These were not ordinary drinking vessels; they were holy artifacts, consecrated to the worship of God, which had been plundered by King Nebuchadnezzar during the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple. Daniel 1:2 notes their initial removal. By using these holy items for a drunken, idolatrous banquet, Belshazzar was not merely celebrating; he was committing a profound act of sacrilege and defiance against the God of Israel, whose power and authority his predecessor, Nebuchadnezzar, had eventually acknowledged.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The KJV's phrase "golden vessels that were taken out of the temple of the house of God which [was] at Jerusalem" precisely details the origin and sacred nature of the items. The emphasis on "golden" suggests their value and perhaps their royal or divine dedication. The term "temple of the house of God" underscores their consecrated purpose, contrasting sharply with their profane use in Belshazzar's feast. While no single Hebrew word here demands a complex linguistic dive for a general audience, the entire description powerfully conveys the immense spiritual offense committed.
Practical Application
Daniel 5:3 offers timeless lessons for believers today:
Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated β the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.